Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

France Offers Europe an 'Inhuman' Model for Immigration

By Julio Godoy, IPS News. Posted July 5, 2008.


French PM Nicolas Sarkozy wants to use France's turn in the EU's rotating presdiency to "harmonize" European immigration policy.
Advertisement

The French government, which assumed the six-month rotating presidency of the EU Jul. 1, is trying to expand its tough policy against immigration and asylum to all of the EU.

Ahead of assuming the European presidency, President Nicolas Sarkozy has been campaigning for a "European Pact on Immigration and Asylum", which would harmonize countries' policies in both areas.

The pact, already discussed in all European capitals, will be officially presented to the EU Jul. 7 and 8 in the southern French city Cannes.

Sarkozy is urging the EU to adopt "selective immigration" and massive expulsion of undocumented migrants.

In a speech to the Greek parliament early June, Sarkozy said his government did not want "a closed Europe...but nor do we want a Europe that stands by powerless before unchecked waves of immigration."

He said harmonization of national policies was urgent, because Europe "can't at the same time have a common area of free movement of women and men, and have 27 national policies on this issue."

Sarkozy aims to expel 25,000 undocumented migrants per year from France. But human rights groups say this target is putting police under strong pressure, and has led to excesses.

"This policy, based on fulfilling statistics, is incompatible with humane treatment of immigrants and refugees, and has created a dreadful climate," Christophe Deltombe, president of the French humanitarian association Emmaus told IPS.

"Thousands of immigrants, who are perfectly integrated in French society, who work here, have a family and lead a rightful life, live with fear in their bellies, because a control order by the French police can destroy their lives. Why must the French state persecute these people who are useful for our economy and do not provoke a single legal problem, and expel them from our country?"

Thomas Ferenczi, European correspondent of the daily Le Monde, said the policy "violates the freedom of people who have committed no other crime than living illegally in France and in Europe." It also leads to creation of so-called centers of detention, "places where the living conditions are deplorable," Ferenczi said.

On June 21, a Tunisian immigrant detained at the Vincennes center died, apparently of a heart attack. Inmates rioted, and the next day set the center on fire.

"We wanted to know more about him," Koné from the Cote d'Ivoire, who was also detained at the center, told IPS. "He was vomiting blood and his nose was bleeding." After inmates protested, "police fired tear-gas, and then the situation deteriorated."

It was the second blaze at the center in two years.

The Vincennes center has capacity for 140, but the government has confined twice as many in there, according to a report by the Ecumenical Support Service (CIMADE, after its French name), a church group helping refugees and immigrants.

CIMADE points out that an official report Jun. 5 had warned the government that the situation at the center was "untenable".

The report said the Vincennes center had become "by its size and its management mode a symbol of the industrialization of (immigrants) capture and detention." It spoke of "the climate of tension and violence that permanently reigns, where nothing is necessary to set it on fire." The report did not mean that literally, but that is exactly what happened less than three weeks later.

Prime minister François Fillon said immediately after the tragedy that "it will not change government policy. Laws are to be respected, and one shouldn't be on French territory if one does not have the authorization."

Minister for the interior Brice Hortefeux praised the "government's achievements" in expelling immigrants. Two days before the Tunisian detainee died, Hortefeux had announced that "expulsions have increased by 80 percent in the first five months of the year."

The expulsions are "a sign that, conforming to the wishes of our citizens, France is controlling its immigration," he said at a press conference Jun. 19. Hortefeux said French detention centers "are better than most."

France has 31 detention centers for undocumented immigrants. Human rights groups report that suicides, self-mutilations and hunger strikes are common in all of them.

"When people who feel they have committed no crime are handcuffed and led to a prison; when they are threatened with rupture WITH their life, their families, and are threatened with expulsion that they see as an end to life, it's not surprising that we see acts of desperation," CIMADE director Damian Nantes told IPS.

The French now want this to be a model for Europe.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: immigration, france, sarkozy, eu

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Americans are much better people than the French
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jul 5, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our government and ruling elites are the worst, and a significant segement of our society are racists troglodytes i.e. the core of Repug party.

However, as a country, our laws on immigration and our efforts to integrate various different ethnic and religious groups is far better than French and most other European countries.

I'm confident that we will change the current climate of anti-immigrant hysteria here.

Comparatively speaking, we Americans are far more tolerant than those arrogant French.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Import-Export Businesses
Posted by: talkville on Jul 5, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since in and around the '60s through today, we've imported and with ravenous hunger and zeal and enthusiasm the 'care of the self' and 'archaeologies of power' and 'nothing but the text' and all kinds of 'discourse' and 'discursive' manners and ways and mean. When one eats fast, one gets indigestion.

Now that things are less clear and slowing down a bit in such socio-cultural things, it is looking more and more like this has been an immensely bold, immensely productive, immensely convincing, and vigorously aggressive injection of Rationalism, in it's more highly understood senses in the realms of philosophy and such, and it's long-standing feud with Empiricism, also in those senses. Culturally speaking, it has also had very interested religious and moral imperatives as well. And Rationalism is quite hostile to the senses and experience. Quite. There are some for whom Reason and Reason alone provides true or valid Knowledge.

Rationally deciding the fate(s) of such 'disturbing' and 'non-rational' elements that hamper and otherwise distort the Order of the State and the Republic is the task the French have set themselves and here in the USA (where some sectors would like much the same perfect Order) is not surprising at all. For to Rationalists immigrants and other undesirable human beings are 'factors'. Definitely not human beings who live and breathe and such.

In-human, not human; analytic and functional units. To be erased out of one column and placed in another until it all tallies perfectly and 'balances out' on the on the spread-sheets and schematics being used to design and form the New State. 'Human' or 'immigrants' but modifiers to distinguish from 'trees', 'streets', 'neighborhoods', 'malls', 'buildings', etc. on the Master Plan.

Analogous efforts are being directed toward the Intangible Aspects such as 'values', 'morals' 'beliefs' and such. Especially those which are also 'immigrant'

Perfectly straight lines, perfect squares, perfect rectangles, perfect symmetries; solid, rigid, rigorous, severe. Rational. In Body and in Soul. In Language and in Deeds.

Inhuman. Get ready for more to come in these environs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Vichy Rule, Mais Oui!
Posted by: Turiye on Jul 5, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How dare they, we are so, so, oh that was about 8 years ago, flashback ever so sorry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An International Problem
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jul 5, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Illegal immigration is an international problem that is only going to get worse. As world citizens face the results of global warming,free trade agreements, competition for oil, growing populations, drought, food shortages, outsourcing and decreasing of jobs, we are going to see deterioration in national laws, more violence, martial law and competition for basic needs and resources. People tend to be more concerned about others when their own basic needs are being met. When they lose their jobs and can't support their families they will not support illegal immigrants getting the available jobs at lower wages. It's a hard world out there and becoming more so everyday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An International Problem Posted by: talkville
Parle vous Arabic?
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 5, 2008 4:55 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
France and Europe are creating their own problems , much as America is now doing.

Every nation has not only a right but a responsibility to control who enters it's country. It affects the work force, living standards etc..etc.. When a situation is left to get out of hand - thanks to the French liberal government of the past - this is what happens.

Before you realize it, the official language of France will be Arabic and European French will be a minority!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Parle vous Arabic? Posted by: SallyD
» RE: Parle vous Arabic? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Parle vous Arabic? Posted by: pfeifer999
I applaud France.
Posted by: JoshuaR on Jul 6, 2008 5:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The indigenous people of France and Europe in general need to stand up for themselves. Multiculturalism in this rapidly declining global climate will bring hordes of refugees north. Indo-Europeans need to defend their homeland and their culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

turn the pig on it's ear...
Posted by: lexicon on Jul 7, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's think of the "immigration problem" this way:

What "appears to be" the two main tenets of globalization, as we see it being implemented today?

First, "Capital must be allowed to move freely across sovereign borders." This core belief in the ideology of globalization purportedly exists to make sure that investment can go where it can do the most good, right?

AND SECOND, "People must be prevented from moving freely across sovereign borders, through strict immigration policies." This core belief panders to the fears of a local populace, always identifying the locals as the "descended upon" and the immigrants as "the horde".

So, what purpose is there to put these two ideologies in tandem? Why, it's simple. If people are "glued down" to the spot, and money can chase and flit around at will, what that provides, is a way for money to CHASE ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES caused by the fact that those labor resources are STUCK and can't move to "clear" the global market for labor.

If people could move, unimpeded by immigration laws or foreign worker laws, then very quickly the relative values of all the world's currencies would stabilize, and Capital would be utterly unable to take advantage of "structural imbalances" (which, after all, is what arbitrage is) because there would be very few structural imbalances left to take advantage of!

Thus, the "benefit" to the wealthy, of being able to fly money out to wherever it was needed, would no longer exist. There'd be no reason to, as the rate of return wouldn't support it.

See...a "worker" can be thought of in terms of being a "unit of wealth" just as a dollar can.

THink of the forex currency markets...every minute, every day, there's money trading around, and now-and-again, there's a temporary imbalance, (for example, 1 USD buys 100 YEN, and 100 YEN buys .4 BP, and .95 USD buys .4 BP. In this situation, you'd buy as many british pounds sterling as you could, use them to buy yen, and use those to buy dollars) and the instant it's recognized, the imbalance is "cleared" through the movement of the market.

HOWEVER, all the "units of wealth" represented by workers, are artificially STUCK inside arbitrary boundaries, and CAN'T "clear" the market. So, in a very real and palpable sense, harsh immigration policies are all about ENSURING STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE. And where there's structural imbalance in a market, there will be money coming in to reap the profit.

So...globalization of money, and privatization of labor...is a grand recipe for the wealthy to coin new money, off the backs of the populace. It is even not a far stretch to call it a form of slavery, or at the least, indentured servitude.

My take on it? If you liberalise money flows, you must liberalise labor flows. Fair's fair. If, as a nation, you don't let workers in, then you can't let foreign money in, either. Fair's fair. if you don't let people out, then don't let money out.

simple. Any other way, and "we" are OWNED.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» une cochon neuveaux? Posted by: pfeifer999