Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Immigration Crack-Downs: A Little Bit of History Repeating

By Edmundo Rocha, AlterNet. Posted July 7, 2008.


The relevance of Mexican repatriation in the past remains vitally important for us to remember today.
Advertisement

Advocates for "enforcement only" would like nothing better than to see a future in which most of the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the US be removed, either through coercive means or voluntarily. In a climate of fear and defensiveness, there is a psychological need to assign blame and fight back against the perceived enemy. It is not the first time that fear has triggered the adoption of tough immigration policies. For example, it was economic insecurity that triggered the racism that contributed to the passage of the infamous laws excluding Chinese immigrants from the US in the late 1800s.

The general invisibility of Latina/o civil rights abuses during the last century has left a large majority of Americans unaware of the forced removal of approximately one to two million persons from the United States during the Great Depression. The 1930s marked the first time in the history of international migration between the US and other countries that the federal government sponsored and supported the mass deportation of immigrants.

Unfortunately, throughout US history, when harsh measures are done in the name of national security, it is often directed at unpopular ethnic/racial minorities. It is easy to draw a parallel between the repatriation of the 1930s and the internment of the Japanese to the measures taken by the US government after September 11 because the policies that were passed after 9/11 proved to be no different. Racial profiling in this sense is a tool that Americans turn to when a perceived outsider threatens to damage the status quo.

History of Exclusion

Despite being recognized as "a nation of immigrants," this country has a long history of selective inclusion and exclusion and mistreatment of the other. During the times of exclusion and deportation, the United States is also a "gatekeeping nation," one that has established rigid immigration policies to control immigration and exclude certain immigrant groups, often based on race or ethnicity.

Within hours of the declaration of war on Japan, all Japanese nationals and Japanese Americans who were in the US were branded "alien enemies." Of the 120,000 men, women, elderly, and children of Japanese ancestry sent to interment camps, more than 60% were native-born citizens. According to the US Department of Justice's "Review of the Restrictions on Persons of Italian Ancestry During World War II: Report to the Congress of the United States," within a few days after President issued Proclamations 2525, 2526 and 2527, 500 aliens of different ancestries were on a train with darkened windows bound for an undisclosed location in Montana.

While most historical comparisons concerning immigration and race before and after 9/11 focus on the incarceration of Japanese Americans, the relevance of Mexican Repatriation remains vitally important for us to remember. Over the last century, migrant workers have been the most exploited class of workers in America. The concept of a guest worker program in this country is not new. More than 72,000 guest workers participated in the program from 1917 to 1921. In 1924, the government to discontinue the program and created the United States Border Patrol to locate and remove all non-citizens illegally. By 1931, it was time for the Mexicans to depart.

During the Mexican Repatriation of the 1930s, approximately 60 percent deported to Mexico were US citizens, including children born on the US. Both local and federal authorities did not consider the rights of the numerous citizens whom they deported. It is estimated that one to two million people were deported from the US. Twelve states - Colorado, Illinois, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Wisconsin, and Wyoming - all lost over half of its Mexican population, while Indiana lost three-fourths.

In "Decade of Betrayal: Mexican Repatriation in the 1930s," Francisco Balderrama and Raymond Rodríquez wrote that the massive deportation and repatriation programs of the 1930s had a profound impact to both the Mexican-American and Mexican immigrant communities. Families were torn apart; deportees lost their personal property, automobiles, homes, businesses, and other investments in America; and lives were destroyed.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: xenophobia, racism, japanese internment, mexican repatriation, immigration

Edmundo Rocha is publisher and editor of XicanoPwr.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
carolyne
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Jul 7, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An interesting review of history that most Americans, myself included, are not aware of.

The current anti-immigrant sentiment is pure racism, egged on by vile right wing haters like Lou Dobbs. I say this as an American of English-Irish extraction. I'm ashamed that our country, founded on such high ideals, has sunk so low as to vilify the most vulnerable among us.

There are many illegal Irish immigrants living in NY and everyone is entranced by their blondish good looks and accents. Similarly, the Ukraine visa over-stayers have a relatively easy time again, since they "look" American, (whatever that is). I know quite a few.No one seems overly eager to deport them.

The current immigration mess is a lost opportunity. We need workers in crucial industries, notably agriculture but also service industries. The Mexican/Central American countries have a large pool of excellent hard workers. That's why they get jobs here. Employers know they are reliable, honest workers who show up on Monday mornings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: carolyne Posted by: dobermanmacleod
» RE: carolyne Posted by: desidid
Question for the author
Posted by: L.A.Lynn on Jul 7, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's say we accept that it is true that ICE, as instructed by governmental policy is indeed targeting illegal immigrants solely on the basis of skin color. And that said, some legal citizens have also been erroneously swept up. If this were admitted, and eradicated by a more humane policy, what would be your idea of "an honest approach to immigration reform," Mr. Rocha?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question for the author Posted by: ERocha
» RE: Question for the author Posted by: dobermanmacleod
» RE: Question for the author Posted by: edweirdness