Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why Counting Undocumented Immigrants In the Census Is Good for America

By Afton Branche, DMI Blog. Posted October 20, 2009.


Undocumented immigrants and their families are an integral part of the social and economic fabric of our country. As such, they should be fully counted in our national census.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Last week I participated in a debate for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on the inclusion of undocumented immigrants in the 2010 census. I argue that a full count of undocumented immigrants and their families brings economic benefits to local communities that no one can afford to miss. I cite the role of population data in the allocation of billions in state and federal funding to local government for critical public programs and services. Without a full count of these immigrants, communities where they live won't receive adequate funding to staff health clinics, repair crumbling bridges and build parks.

In the opposing article, Phil Kent of Americans for Immigration Control doesn't mention the economic consequences of excluding the undocumented. He instead takes up the political implications of counting undocumented immigrants in population totals used for Congressional apportionment and redistricting, and says: "Counting millions of illegal immigrants will unquestionably and unconstitutionally increase the number of US House of Representatives members in some states and rob other states of their rightful representation."

I'll address Kent's first point: it is no secret that some states will gain House seats after next year's reapportionment process, and others will lose. This is how our political system works, and it's false to claim that this is because undocumented residents of one state have "stolen" representation from residents of another. Second, counting undocumented immigrants is not unconstitutional. The 14th Amendment explicitly states that all people in the United States are to be counted for distributing US representatives--this includes non-citizens and non-voters.

Unfortunately, Kent isn't alone in his misguided attempt to exclude millions of US residents from the census count. His statements come on the heels of this week's amendment to the Senate Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies appropriations bill by Senators David Vitter (R-LA) and Bob Bennett (R-UT). The amendment aims to add citizenship questions to the census, and exclude undocumented immigrants and other non-citizens from the apportionment and redistricting process. To inspire support for his amendment, Vitter states that counting the undocumented in apportionment totals rewards states with "large populations of illegals," while penalizing other states. If passed, the amendment could threaten the accuracy of the entire census. Adding citizenship questions will likely intimidate undocumented immigrants and other non-residents, and dissuade large groups from responding to the survey, undermining the count.

In the New York Post, Linda Chavez echoes an old conservative claim that counting non-citizens in legislative districts dilutes the votes of citizens and distorts our political process. Sure, undocumented immigrants are included in legislative districts, even though they are non-voters. But they are not the only group of non-voters counted, nor are they the largest; children, ex-felons and legal permanent residents are counted in redistricting totals, but none can vote. The census intentionally counts residents, not just voters to draw legislative districts, and this affects the relative power of an individual's vote in ways that have nothing to do with undocumented immigrants.

Chavez further argues that this year's efforts to encourage census response in immigrant communities is only a Democratic power play, supported by the Obama Administration, Hispanic advocacy organizations and unions. Encouraging census response is not some blue-state power grab, but a critical step in ensuring that communities can secure their fair share of federal funding and business investment for the next ten years. Undocumented immigrants and their families are an integral part of the social and economic fabric of our country--as such, they should be fully counted in our national census.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: immigration, census, undocumented immigrants, u.s. census

Afton Branche is a research assistant at the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Faulty logic
Posted by: brunowe on Oct 20, 2009 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"it's false to claim that this is because undocumented residents of one state have "stolen" representation from residents of another."

The existence of other factors in the reapportionment of Representatives doesn't eliminate the illegal alien factor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The illegal immigration pandemic needs to end!
Posted by: countingdaisies on Oct 20, 2009 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many articles about illegal immigration yet we haven't heard any mention of it from the White House in quite a while. I'm beginning to think that the government hopes if the subject is ignored it will be forgotten. In the meantime, the illegals continue to receive handouts paid for by the citizens. They get food stamps and free healthcare while we get shit upon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the last time people,
Posted by: njguy73 on Oct 20, 2009 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if we count undocumented immigrants, they become (trumpets roll)...

Documented!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But they don't become legal Posted by: brunowe
We mustn't fall for the trap
Posted by: Brittanicus on Oct 20, 2009 5:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) has been advising an amendment to the Commerce, Justice, and Science appropriations bill that would require the U.S. Census Bureau to add questions regarding immigration & citizenship status to the 2010 decennial census. If these questions are not endorsed it is certain that illegal aliens will be counted in the census and states will lose/gain Congressional seats and large amounts of federal funding (and electoral college votes) due to this counting of illegal aliens. The only states that will greatly benefit from the original Census are the illegal immigrant SANCTUARY STATES, such as CALIFORNIA.

Extraction by E-Verification will cause--expedited ATTRITION--without huge expenditures, without forced deportation. Agents of ICE only need to mobilize a large force of Auditors to investigate employer I-9 records. Especially if informants within, are on the payroll, having discovered suspicious individuals working there? Being responsive that there are severe monetary risks or even prison, for employing illegal employees? We surely need exemplary court sentences for companies that hire illegal labor. So when unable to support themselves as jobs are no longer available, they will leave by their own accord. NOW IS THE TIME TO COMMAND OUR RETICENT SENATE & CONGRESSMAN TO IMPLEMENT E-VERIFY PERMANENTLY FOR EVERYBODY IN THE WORKPLACE AT 202-224-3121. Also investigate the prestigious public watchdog legal group at JUDICIAL WATCH relating too sleaze and corruption in--ALL--government. CAPSWEB will explain to you about the risk of OVERPOPULATION.

If we think about the monetary consequences of another AMNESTY, it will unbelievably stagger the mind. Not only will it legalize somewhere between 20 and 30 million more people, but it will attract millions of despondent people from across the border and other impoverished nation of the world. We are informed by politicians that it will be an impossible task to deport the huge numbers of illegal entrants already in the United States. But E-Verify can and will exclude illegal immigrants from the job market as it’s available to every business freely on the Internet. There should be no excuse for not using this immigration enforcement tool? Out government is failing to protect our borders or even the interior enforcement of our nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Requires Honesty
Posted by: DAD77 on Oct 21, 2009 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Adding questions regarding immigration & citizenship status to the 2010 decennial census would do no good. It would just generate more false information.

What is the probability an illegal alien is going to open the door?

And even less probable is that the illgal immigrant would answer the census questions honestly.

After compiling the falsified information, the census would under estimated the illegal immigrant population by orders of magnitude. However, pro-illegal immigrant groups would say -- "Look, there isn't as many as we thought; so why not give them amesty?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BULL CRAP!!!
Posted by: jaglover on Oct 22, 2009 12:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's NO logic that flies that says we're better off counting illegal aliens! If they're not citizens THEY DON'T GET COUNTED!!! It's that simple. Counting NON-CITIZENS can only do one thing and that's skew the numbers and breed inaccuracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fsafrr
Posted by: mjx729 on Oct 26, 2009 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On September 12 the news, Nike Dunks reported in the morning according to the Nike Dunk overseas media that the White House Nike SB on 11th announced that Nike Dunk High American President the Barack Obama decided writs Nike Dunk Low request for commendation of a Nike Air Force 1 subordinate especially to the Chinese tire the Air Force 1 Shoes implementation limit customs duty, Nike Air Max lasts three years. the White House indicated in a Air Max Shoes statement that the first year to the tire which will import from China will levy additional taxes 35% customs duties, Air Max 90 the second year will levy additional taxes 30%, the third year will Air Max 95 levy additional taxes 25%. the present Puma Shoes US to from the Bape Shoes Chinese import tire customs duty is 4%. The morning of air jordan September 12 Beijing time, air jordans according to foreign media reports, Wholesale nike shox the United States 11, Wholesale air force 1 the White House announced Wholesale nike jordan that U.S. President Barack Obama Wholesale nike jordans decided the case of China's tire Wholesale air jordan restrictions safeguard Wholesale jordan shoes tariffs for three years. Wholesale air jordans The White House said in aWholesale nike shoes statement that the first year of Wholesale air max tires imported from China will nike air max impose 35 percent tariffs, air max 90 imposed 30 percent the second year, Wholesale nike dunks third year to levy 25%.air max shoes The current U.S. tariffs on Wholesale jordans imports from China tires of 4%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Illegal Trespassing Mexican Immigrants, RSM, CA 2009
Posted by: turies on Nov 6, 2009 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
illegal trespassing mexican immigrants: we r not liable 4 the millions of cash-cow welfare babies that these breeders keep popping out & can't afford, dragging them & their country 2 the poorhouse. let them reap the consequences of their own foolish ways. middle american's have worked too hard & too long to obtain what little quality of life that we have, to just have it destroyed by a bunch of lawless, non-contributing & notoriously rapturous (even murderous) invading american-haters living beside us. no way! no how!

southern CA is the #1 sanctuary state for illegal mexican immigrants. following CA will impact ur everyday citizens at the home level. to understand this watch this hidden video, & don't let this happen to ur communities youtube.com/watch?v=5dha5A9vsdk ...these illegals r not ur educated, law abiding, God fearing upper middle-class folk! they're the scum of the earth of their country, morally bankrupt, desperate low-life's. they r unsophisticated, lawless & brazen beyond belief. they r radical & violent members of Raza, believing they can takeover 5 states (they believe belong to mexico) bordering mexico by populating them to the point of becoming the majority.

unabated residential trespassing infestation of monumental proportions - learn from californians' wise & costly experience: once across the border, they come straight to ur communities, traveling in gangs from the slums to upscale neighborhoods to prowl ur streets, coming into ur yards digging in ur trash-cans for cans, ss & credit card numbers. police will not respond. if u tell them to get off ur property u will either be verbally threatened and/or attacked, become a victim of vandalism, and/or even become a high risk victim of murder by these undocumented & unchecked renege ghost-like dangerous immigrants, that come & go as they please. waste no time in demanding that city officials enforce trespassing laws NOW in ur community! start up a seriously dedicated neighborhood-watch. don't wait, thinking it will just resolve itself or just somehow go away!
good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement