IMMIGRATION  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 21

What's the Border Fence Good for? Subsidizing Mexican Scrap Metal Entrepreneurs

It was obvious from the very beginning that Bush’s push for a border fence was nothing more than a political show to boost Republicans' creds with their base.
September 28, 2009  |  
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Immigration headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Last week, the Government Accountability Office released a depressing audit of the US-Mexico border fence we’ve been trying to put up for the past three years. The report caused about 8 hours of pretend outrage and was promptly forgotten. It found that we’d already shoveled $2.4 billion to half-seal 600 miles of the border since 2005 (we still have about 100 to 200 miles to go) and we would need to spend an additional $6.5 billion over the next 20 years just plugging up holes punched in the fencing.

The Christian Science Monitor:

So far, it has been breached 3,363 times, requiring $1,300 for the average repair. . . . Despite the price tag of maintaining the border fence, authorities have not found a way to determine whether it is helping to halt illegal immigration, the GAO report says.

The only semi-relevant stats we got are the number of illegal border border-crossers being caught by the US Border Patrol, which has dropped by 25 percent in recent times. But that doesn’t tell us much. “No one knows whether the decrease in crossers is due to the recession keeping people home, the thousands of new border patrol agents or the more than 600 miles of new border fence that has been built,” says NPR.

There is one thing we can be sure of: the massive steel pylons have been a boon for Mexican scrap metal entrepreneurs, who are able to supplement their incomes by dragging off whole sections of the fence right under the nose of our beefed up Border Patrol.

Bush’s Secure Fence Act of 2006 mandated that the Department of Homeland Security had 1.5 years to create a physical border fence bolstered by surveillance technology. But it was obvious from the very beginning that Bush’s push for a border fence was nothing more than a political show—there was not enough time and not enough money—to boost Bush’s and Republicans' creds with their base. Besides, the real Republican base–Bush’s corporate sponsors, “the haves and the have mores”–were the ones who benefited most from all that cheap illegal-immigrant labor, so naturally it was bound to be a half-assed effort intended to quell the Tea Party suckers who believe the Republicans. The building contractors were the only ones who stood to gain from the massive, wasteful show of Republican fake-patriotism. A show that’s still costing us billions.

I was down on the Arizona-Mexico border about six months ago doing a story on a McGyver-style vigilante group called the American Border Patrol and saw the total clusterfuck that is our border fence up close and personal.

One day I was ATVing along a freshly built stretch of the fence on the Arizona border, when I ran into a bored, young US Border Patrol agent. He seemed skeptical about the wall doing much good. The wall wouldn’t make much of a difference, he told me. “They” always figure out a way to get through—or over, in this case. Burros carrying bales of drugs on their back simply throw a rope up over the two-storey barrier, snagging it with some sort of hook on one of the fence’s steel beams and scuttle up and over.

The amazing thing is that they’ve managed to get cars over it, too. According to the agent, Mexican smugglers rig trucks with collapsible ramps similar to those used at old-school airports for boarding planes. They would have two trucks drive up to the fence—one on each side of the border—line them up and have their hombres drive right over. Apparently, a whole caravan of cars and pickup trucks could cross that way in a matter of minutes. When they were done, the ramps would be folded up and concealed, and the operator would drive peacefully home.


Yasha Levine is a McMansion inhabitin’ editor of The eXiled. He is currently stationed in Victorville, CA. You can reach him at levine [at] exiledonline.com.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Immigration headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: immigration, border


Comments are closed-

Time for the Megamerge Dissolution Solution
Posted by: tlwinslow on Sep 29, 2009 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush Border Fence is sheer stupidity since the 1,969-mi. U.S.-Mexico border is unsealable, and we cannot wall out Mexicans to make them go away. Instead, it's time to accept their existence and work with them as equals to share the New World in peace by making the border go poof and incorporating Mexico into the U.S. as 10+ new states sans the corrupt Mexican federal govt., allowing Mexico to finally be developed as a sector of the U.S. to alleviate poverty.

Take time to learn about the Megamerge Dissolution Solution to the U.S.-Mexico border problem and find out why and how it should be done now for the good of the U.S.

http://go.to/megamerge

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Do you ever hear about the Maginot line?
Posted by: bitsfick on Sep 29, 2009 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That didn't work either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: Stop the non-sense and jail employers of illegals
Posted by: desertrose on Sep 29, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You must have missed this line in the story:

Besides, the real Republican base–Bush’s corporate sponsors, “the haves and the have mores”–were the ones who benefited most from all that cheap illegal-immigrant labor, so naturally it was bound to be a half-assed effort intended to quell the Tea Party suckers who believe the Republicans.
Plus your argument about your alleged Maria is rude and false.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: Stop the non-sense and jail abusive employers
Posted by: MdeG on Sep 29, 2009 2:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 14th amendment is there for a good reason, and it should stay.

"Jail all employers of illegals." Now that's a hard one. What about the guy who got fooled 20 years ago by forged documents? The employers of undocumented labor are not necessarily blameworthy. If someone's giving fair pay for an honest day's work [sic] I actually don't have much of an issue with it.

What I'd love to see done: Get the slave-drivers. Go after everyone who pays below minimum, doesn't pay, pays late, doesn't give overtime, harasses, paws, subjects workers to dangerous conditions, doesn't provide a restroom, doesn't allow breaks. That would cut the incentives that encourage cynical abusers to preferentially hire undocumented labor.

*Those* are the employers who degrade pay and conditions for all of us. They do exist -- every allegation listed above is one that I know about in particular. You can drive the lot of them out of business and I'll be just delighted.

P.S. My name is Maria, too. I was born here, thank you very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

movie material
Posted by: grmartin on Sep 29, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stranger than fiction, and funny is the concept of redneck Americans vs Mexican scrap dealers fighting over this fence, while migrants scoot through the holes. The only thing that could be weirder than the fence's conception - are its consequences. And perhaps a lesson for those dumb suckers who go for simplistic solutions and isolation in gated communities. This frontier was stolen by los Americanos way back, and is yet to be tamed - especially by a ridiculous fence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

You've been hoodwinked......hahahaha......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 29, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"....“the haves and the have mores”–were the ones who benefited most from all that cheap illegal-immigrant labor, so naturally it was bound to be a half-assed effort intended to quell the Tea Party suckers who believe the Republicans."

That says it all, the haves and the have mores are the very people that are benefiting, yet they aren't being jailed, or severely fined! In the meantime their media pals employees are stirring up a whole lot of hullabaloo about "illegal immigration", with angry underemployed white folk that are too ignorant to really see that they (& their anger) are being used against their own self-interests!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Lets use our heads here, We have costly damage to the fence
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar on Sep 29, 2009 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and illegal aliens being rounded up daily.

Why not sentence every illegal alien capable of labor to 60 hours work detail on the fence prior to being bussed back home. We could probably have it shined and polished with all that free labor.

Then we could bring to nearly nothing the cost of repairs, while at the same time deterring further destruction of the fence.

I mean you probably would be less likely to destroy something that you or your family and friends would be forced to repair, right?

This plan is pure poetic justice.

Brilliant!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Repeal NAFTA
Posted by: mozillafs on Sep 29, 2009 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repealing NAFTA will do more to stop undocumented immigration than any wall ever would.

We stop the flight of the jobless and poor by improving the very situations they're attempting to flee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epeal NAFTA Posted by: Dak

Comments are closed-

Jan Lawson
Posted by: sunnyskiesinyuma on Sep 29, 2009 3:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Yuma AZ along the AZ-MEX border. One impact from the SBI net that is not discussed as much as it should be is the environmental degration to the desert environment caused by Border Patrol agents. Agents drive off roads, make new roads, make winder and wider drag roads (for finding "sign" crossing them), and the result is whole-scale destruction of our public's natural and cultural resources. It has to be seen to be belived, but apparently no one is looking. It seems no one has control over what the agents in the field do "in the line of duty."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It's the l'anguish, stupid
Posted by: tokerdesigner on Sep 29, 2009 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if, in order to help integrate our society, families in suburbs across America facing foreclosure could experience a summer payments bonanza by being able to rent the co-use of their house and garden to summer worker families from Mexico or other points south (as far as Tierra del Fuego)?

Some in-house "bedroom" areas would be used for storage of personal property; kids and maybe even some groan-ups would sleep in treehouses which is what they want to do anyway. Forestry and deadwood carpentry would be featured work attractions.

There is no excuse for pretending we can't learn a second language and live bilingual from now on, with many fine audio-visual courses now on the innanet. However, the problem of foreign language phobia, more prevalent in USA than most countries, needs to be studied and drugfree remediation strategies designed, based on building up the self-confidence of the individual to understand even if the other guy talks fast.

Once achieved, integrated coop arrangements for family and work life could greatly improve the economy, accomplish pressing tasks the taxpayer can afford to pay for (such as the clipping of megatons of biofuels from drought zones in California and elsewhere to prevent billion-dollar fires; in the "winter", millions could "hemigrate" south, do similar work and reside co-op in Australia, Brasil, Chile etc.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Money for stupid shit.
Posted by: kelly.nickell on Sep 29, 2009 10:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It amazes me, the amount of money and time a person will waste trying to keep a few million illegals from getting what a hundred million can't.

Everyone seems to want to shut it down with hair-brained ideas, but no one talks about the price tag - direct, and indirect.

Imagine what improved imperviousness does to the coyote business. Imagine how much it costs for an illegal to get home and back, with costs for crossing skyrocketing.

Just ask Stockton and Modesto what it costs them to take care of the out-of-the-system people that need healthcare, insurance, bondsman, and other things we just eat as taxpayers because we like spending so much on our outrage. It's kind of like making one family rich, and killing the rest by outlawing hooch; it seems kind of counter-intuitive.

Open the borders. Track who comes and goes. Make them pay taxes. Make them be a number in our system. Then perhaps we'll see who's really getting screwed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Given the state of the economy, what makes you think
Posted by: bitsfick on Oct 2, 2009 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mexicans are the only ones cutting it up for scrap?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Half-Assed but we can do better
Posted by: independent1 on Oct 6, 2009 12:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the US - Mexican border is about 1600 miles long? And the claim is that such a length makes a wall impractical and undoable?? COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSHIT!!

The chinese built a wall 5500 miles long!! This wall succeeded - FOR CENTURIES - in keeping out invaders. The Romans built walls which were completely impenetrable, although of somewhat shorter length.

Oh, and the Soviets built a wall that succeeded very well too - completely controlling traffic in and out of "their territory."

I mention the Berlin Wall because it was an example of what can be done when people get serious about controlling traffic across their borders. That wall, like the Great Wall of China, was garrisoned by military troops, not by "sleepy, nonchalant" border patrol officers.

Those "Mexican scrap dealers" MUST be machine gunned out of business. A DOUBLE wall (as were the Roman and Chinese walls) would solve the problem of ( and concern about) shooting Mexicans while they were still in their own country. Allow breaching of the first wall but kill everything which enters the zone between walls.

As for those mountainous areas: the US military has had LOTS of practice handling incursions over mountainous terrain. Again - it involves shooting a lot of criminal invaders and it might be expensive at first (using armed drone aircraft). But after a few thousand invaders died on those mountain tracks and failed to be heard from again - those "hopeful" criminal invaders at home would lose heart of trying themselves.

Every adult of military age in the border states should be carrying adequate firepower to help repel the invaders. The only restriction they should face in their use of deadly force would be that they had to first determine that the suspect had no valid passport. And they would STILL be able to report even legal immigrants if they were trespassing.

Sure, the Bush Border Fence is half-assed, (just as everything else he did was half-assed:he was a loser). But we can do better and we MUST do better because, heck, we're Americans. :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We can do better - addendum
Posted by: independent1 on Oct 6, 2009 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I forgot to add: The other thing which MUST be done at once is:
order NO MORE SEARCH AND RESCUE ops by the US Border Patrol or anyone else. The whole idea is to kill off invaders, not to "rescue them."

Possibly, those mountain tracks could be booby trapped to up the body count. No need for land mines, just a lot of bomb craters and other disruptions of foot paths. Probably a few pit traps could be put in place: with camouflage and lots of large, pointy stakes at the bottom.

Remember; quitters never win, winners never quit. That's what makes this article so pathetic: another call for us to quit a just cause.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Time for the Megamerge Dissolution Solution
Posted by: tlwinslow on Sep 29, 2009 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush Border Fence is sheer stupidity since the 1,969-mi. U.S.-Mexico border is unsealable, and we cannot wall out Mexicans to make them go away. Instead, it's time to accept their existence and work with them as equals to share the New World in peace by making the border go poof and incorporating Mexico into the U.S. as 10+ new states sans the corrupt Mexican federal govt., allowing Mexico to finally be developed as a sector of the U.S. to alleviate poverty.

Take time to learn about the Megamerge Dissolution Solution to the U.S.-Mexico border problem and find out why and how it should be done now for the good of the U.S.

http://go.to/megamerge

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Do you ever hear about the Maginot line?
Posted by: bitsfick on Sep 29, 2009 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That didn't work either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: Stop the non-sense and jail employers of illegals
Posted by: desertrose on Sep 29, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You must have missed this line in the story:

Besides, the real Republican base–Bush’s corporate sponsors, “the haves and the have mores”–were the ones who benefited most from all that cheap illegal-immigrant labor, so naturally it was bound to be a half-assed effort intended to quell the Tea Party suckers who believe the Republicans.
Plus your argument about your alleged Maria is rude and false.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: Stop the non-sense and jail abusive employers
Posted by: MdeG on Sep 29, 2009 2:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 14th amendment is there for a good reason, and it should stay.

"Jail all employers of illegals." Now that's a hard one. What about the guy who got fooled 20 years ago by forged documents? The employers of undocumented labor are not necessarily blameworthy. If someone's giving fair pay for an honest day's work [sic] I actually don't have much of an issue with it.

What I'd love to see done: Get the slave-drivers. Go after everyone who pays below minimum, doesn't pay, pays late, doesn't give overtime, harasses, paws, subjects workers to dangerous conditions, doesn't provide a restroom, doesn't allow breaks. That would cut the incentives that encourage cynical abusers to preferentially hire undocumented labor.

*Those* are the employers who degrade pay and conditions for all of us. They do exist -- every allegation listed above is one that I know about in particular. You can drive the lot of them out of business and I'll be just delighted.

P.S. My name is Maria, too. I was born here, thank you very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

movie material
Posted by: grmartin on Sep 29, 2009 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stranger than fiction, and funny is the concept of redneck Americans vs Mexican scrap dealers fighting over this fence, while migrants scoot through the holes. The only thing that could be weirder than the fence's conception - are its consequences. And perhaps a lesson for those dumb suckers who go for simplistic solutions and isolation in gated communities. This frontier was stolen by los Americanos way back, and is yet to be tamed - especially by a ridiculous fence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

You've been hoodwinked......hahahaha......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 29, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"....“the haves and the have mores”–were the ones who benefited most from all that cheap illegal-immigrant labor, so naturally it was bound to be a half-assed effort intended to quell the Tea Party suckers who believe the Republicans."

That says it all, the haves and the have mores are the very people that are benefiting, yet they aren't being jailed, or severely fined! In the meantime their media pals employees are stirring up a whole lot of hullabaloo about "illegal immigration", with angry underemployed white folk that are too ignorant to really see that they (& their anger) are being used against their own self-interests!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Lets use our heads here, We have costly damage to the fence
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar on Sep 29, 2009 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and illegal aliens being rounded up daily.

Why not sentence every illegal alien capable of labor to 60 hours work detail on the fence prior to being bussed back home. We could probably have it shined and polished with all that free labor.

Then we could bring to nearly nothing the cost of repairs, while at the same time deterring further destruction of the fence.

I mean you probably would be less likely to destroy something that you or your family and friends would be forced to repair, right?

This plan is pure poetic justice.

Brilliant!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Repeal NAFTA
Posted by: mozillafs on Sep 29, 2009 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repealing NAFTA will do more to stop undocumented immigration than any wall ever would.

We stop the flight of the jobless and poor by improving the very situations they're attempting to flee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epeal NAFTA Posted by: Dak

Comments are closed-

Jan Lawson
Posted by: sunnyskiesinyuma on Sep 29, 2009 3:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Yuma AZ along the AZ-MEX border. One impact from the SBI net that is not discussed as much as it should be is the environmental degration to the desert environment caused by Border Patrol agents. Agents drive off roads, make new roads, make winder and wider drag roads (for finding "sign" crossing them), and the result is whole-scale destruction of our public's natural and cultural resources. It has to be seen to be belived, but apparently no one is looking. It seems no one has control over what the agents in the field do "in the line of duty."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It's the l'anguish, stupid
Posted by: tokerdesigner on Sep 29, 2009 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if, in order to help integrate our society, families in suburbs across America facing foreclosure could experience a summer payments bonanza by being able to rent the co-use of their house and garden to summer worker families from Mexico or other points south (as far as Tierra del Fuego)?

Some in-house "bedroom" areas would be used for storage of personal property; kids and maybe even some groan-ups would sleep in treehouses which is what they want to do anyway. Forestry and deadwood carpentry would be featured work attractions.

There is no excuse for pretending we can't learn a second language and live bilingual from now on, with many fine audio-visual courses now on the innanet. However, the problem of foreign language phobia, more prevalent in USA than most countries, needs to be studied and drugfree remediation strategies designed, based on building up the self-confidence of the individual to understand even if the other guy talks fast.

Once achieved, integrated coop arrangements for family and work life could greatly improve the economy, accomplish pressing tasks the taxpayer can afford to pay for (such as the clipping of megatons of biofuels from drought zones in California and elsewhere to prevent billion-dollar fires; in the "winter", millions could "hemigrate" south, do similar work and reside co-op in Australia, Brasil, Chile etc.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Money for stupid shit.
Posted by: kelly.nickell on Sep 29, 2009 10:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It amazes me, the amount of money and time a person will waste trying to keep a few million illegals from getting what a hundred million can't.

Everyone seems to want to shut it down with hair-brained ideas, but no one talks about the price tag - direct, and indirect.

Imagine what improved imperviousness does to the coyote business. Imagine how much it costs for an illegal to get home and back, with costs for crossing skyrocketing.

Just ask Stockton and Modesto what it costs them to take care of the out-of-the-system people that need healthcare, insurance, bondsman, and other things we just eat as taxpayers because we like spending so much on our outrage. It's kind of like making one family rich, and killing the rest by outlawing hooch; it seems kind of counter-intuitive.

Open the borders. Track who comes and goes. Make them pay taxes. Make them be a number in our system. Then perhaps we'll see who's really getting screwed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Given the state of the economy, what makes you think
Posted by: bitsfick on Oct 2, 2009 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mexicans are the only ones cutting it up for scrap?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Half-Assed but we can do better
Posted by: independent1 on Oct 6, 2009 12:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the US - Mexican border is about 1600 miles long? And the claim is that such a length makes a wall impractical and undoable?? COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSHIT!!

The chinese built a wall 5500 miles long!! This wall succeeded - FOR CENTURIES - in keeping out invaders. The Romans built walls which were completely impenetrable, although of somewhat shorter length.

Oh, and the Soviets built a wall that succeeded very well too - completely controlling traffic in and out of "their territory."

I mention the Berlin Wall because it was an example of what can be done when people get serious about controlling traffic across their borders. That wall, like the Great Wall of China, was garrisoned by military troops, not by "sleepy, nonchalant" border patrol officers.

Those "Mexican scrap dealers" MUST be machine gunned out of business. A DOUBLE wall (as were the Roman and Chinese walls) would solve the problem of ( and concern about) shooting Mexicans while they were still in their own country. Allow breaching of the first wall but kill everything which enters the zone between walls.

As for those mountainous areas: the US military has had LOTS of practice handling incursions over mountainous terrain. Again - it involves shooting a lot of criminal invaders and it might be expensive at first (using armed drone aircraft). But after a few thousand invaders died on those mountain tracks and failed to be heard from again - those "hopeful" criminal invaders at home would lose heart of trying themselves.

Every adult of military age in the border states should be carrying adequate firepower to help repel the invaders. The only restriction they should face in their use of deadly force would be that they had to first determine that the suspect had no valid passport. And they would STILL be able to report even legal immigrants if they were trespassing.

Sure, the Bush Border Fence is half-assed, (just as everything else he did was half-assed:he was a loser). But we can do better and we MUST do better because, heck, we're Americans. :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

We can do better - addendum
Posted by: independent1 on Oct 6, 2009 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I forgot to add: The other thing which MUST be done at once is:
order NO MORE SEARCH AND RESCUE ops by the US Border Patrol or anyone else. The whole idea is to kill off invaders, not to "rescue them."

Possibly, those mountain tracks could be booby trapped to up the body count. No need for land mines, just a lot of bomb craters and other disruptions of foot paths. Probably a few pit traps could be put in place: with camouflage and lots of large, pointy stakes at the bottom.

Remember; quitters never win, winners never quit. That's what makes this article so pathetic: another call for us to quit a just cause.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS