Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Anti-Immigration Hardliners Launch Fake "Progressive" Front Group

By Eric Ward, Imagine 2050. Posted April 1, 2009.


A fringe group is trying to give the illusion that the anti-immigrant movement is broader than it really is.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Real progressives would do well to prepare in the coming months. The civil rights organization Center for New Community announced in the most recent edition of its e-bulletin, FAIR Exposed, that the Tanton Network has launched a front group called Progressives for Immigration Reform (PFIR). PFIR is simply another addition to a growing list of anti-immigrant groups being set up under the Tanton Network to give the illusion that the anti-immigrant movement is broader than it really is.

This network of organizations is named after white nationalist John Tanton the founder and key leader in a network of anti-immigrant organizations, spin-offs and front groups. Key entities include Center for Immigration Studies, Social Contract Press, and the Coalition for the Future American Worker.

John Tanton is a controversial figure. The founder and a current board member of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), Tanton helped secure over a million dollars in funding from a foundation known as the Pioneer Fund, a racist foundation that peddles pseudo-science claiming that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites based on cultural and biological factors. In the 1930s the Pioneer Fund distributed propaganda films developed by the Nazi Germany to public schools.

The Tanton network has made repeated attempts to recruit within progressive circles targeting environmentalists, labor and black civil rights organizations with only token success. However, with immigration reform back on the table and the majority of Americans lining up behind it, progressives are now seen by the Tanton network as a possible block to sink any attempts at creating a viable immigration system in the United States.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: racism, immigration, tanton, anti-immigrant

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
unfreinus
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Apr 1, 2009 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about wolfs in sheep clothing, who is funding your daily undocumented immigrant (illegal alien) stories. Immigrants come after complying with the laws, which is fine with me. The one's that come without approval, are the bigots and racist. That's how I see it when you palace their race before all others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: unfreinus Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: unfreinus Posted by: losingmyliberties
» RE: unfreinus Posted by: dissentisgood
» RE: unfreinus Posted by: losingmyliberties
Issue is who should fill US jobs:Americans or foreigners?
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Apr 1, 2009 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There could be bigots in opposition to immigration. However, Americans concerned about jobs at fair wages for Americans, and the kids of Americans, and the preservation of American culture, are not bigots. America should stop its free trade in goods, services and people policy and protect its native born people of all backgrounds. If we have to pay more for agricultural goods, cars or electronics, so what? In the end, won't the trade deficit with China cause higher interest rates and prices anyway?

Our current immigration laws were shaped primarily by Lyndon Johnson, Ted Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and Sen Alan Simpson. I suppose the LaRaza-the Race- Mexican supremicists Pelosi and Obama chum with think that those US leaders were racists too because they were whites and not in favor of open borders,even though they supported amnesty and open America to millions of nonwhites for the first time.

Enforcement of those laws is not racist no matter what some new lobbying group, which may or may not have ties to some racist nationalists, thinks. Friends of US workers are against the theft of US jobs by foreign nations and their citizens who sneak into America.

Let the socalled civil rights group which is so concerned about this alleged "front" group ask Obama about why a strong card check law has been ditched by the Wall St whores who run the "liberal" Obama Administration. The right to organize is a civil right too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Brevitas Posted by: johnwinthrop
Truth in advertising
Posted by: Crazy H on Apr 1, 2009 3:48 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"there oughtta be a law..."

I'm getting sick & tired of the repugs astro-turf movements and false front organizations. Especially when they give them names that sound like the exact opposite of what they really are.

Like "Friends of the Forest" for instance. It's really a group of logging industry insiders - they're not friends of the forest, they're friends of the CEOs.

"Friends of the Family" ... "Pro-life" ... "Defense of Marriage" ... "Healthy Forests" ... "Clear Skies" ... gimme a break.

We all know why they have to hide their real agendas: if they came out and told the truth nobody would want to be associated with them.

Take the racists who posted the first responses above. "Jus' cuz I hates darkies ain't no reason to call me no racist."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Truth in advertising Posted by: losingmyliberties
agreed
Posted by: shanbrom@aol.com on Apr 27, 2009 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think if you look closely you'll find that Mr. Ward has some association with Center for New Community, a front for Business As Usual, a plot to profit corporations by reducing wages for working Americans, particularly Hispanics and blacks, who suffer most from the open-borders influx of about 1.6 million immigrants per year. Tsk.
Mr. Ward's argument damages the very minorities he claims to be concerned with.
If progressivism means a fair wage and an end to US economic and ecological imperialism then progressives should oppose high levels of immigration to the US. John Tanton or not, everywhere in Europe, except the UK, they control immigration.
Mr. Ward, are you on the payroll of Center for New Community?
Note to Mr. Ward--Propaganda: an epistemically defective argument used to suppress thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement