Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Arab "Registry" Upheld; Policy About Immigration, Not Counter-Terrorism

By Edward Alden, New America Media. Posted October 7, 2008.


A New York court says the program is legitimate.
Advertisement

More than 140,000 Arabs and Muslims in the United States were forced to register with the government after the September 11 attacks in a heavy-handed effort to keep terrorists out of the country. The registration scheme did not uncover any terrorists, but it did find some 13,000 immigration violators, who were then deported.

Last week a New York appeals court upheld the program. The court ruled unequivocally that the U.S. Justice Department had the authority to enforce the so-called National Entry-Exit Registration Scheme (NSEERS) that was set up in 2002, and to deport anyone who ran afoul of its rules. Constitutionally, the court was right; in every other respect -- economically, diplomatically, and morally, it was wrong.

Of all the programs set up after 9/11 with the goal of catching terrorists on U.S. soil, none was more ill-conceived than NSEERS. It set out special rules for most male visitors from two dozen Arab and Muslim countries, requiring lengthy security screenings before they came to the United States and forcing them to register with the government again if they spent more than a month here. Citizens of those countries living here already without green cards were also required to register, and if they were found to be out of immigration status, they were deported. While the special registration requirements were abolished at the end of 2003, much of the program remains in place today.

Imad Daou, a young Christian from Lebanon, is just one of thousands -- none of whom has ever been shown to have any connection to terrorism -- who got caught out by the scheme. I met Daou this spring in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, a violent border city that has been crippled by the drug wars. It was the last place Daou ever expected to end up when he left his home in Beirut in July of 2003 to come to Texas A & M International University (TAMIU) to do a master's degree in computer science.

TAMIU is in Laredo, only a few miles from the border with Mexico. During his first weekend at the school, he was standing at a bus stop when he met Maria Guadelupe Garcia, a Mexican-American who was studying for her master's in international business at TAMIU and teaching at a Laredo high school. He seemed, as she later put it, "lost and in great need of help"; the bus he was waiting for did not run on the weekends. She later invited him to attend Catholic mass with her and other students from the university dorms. They fell in love, and got engaged, with plans to marry when the academic term ended in the spring of 2004.

In November, 2003, she decided to make it official with her family. First, she introduced him to her parents in Del Rio, Texas and then, with the easy informality that had long connected both sides of the border, they crossed the Rio Grande into Acuna, Mexico to meet her sister and to invite her to a Thanksgiving dinner in Texas the next day. The two had already been to Mexico several times together and had faced no problems coming back. But when they returned to the border after a two-hour visit, the U.S. inspector looked at Daou's Lebanese passport, checked in his computer system and determined that Daou had failed to register with the U.S. government after 30 days as was required under NSEERS.

Rather than simply issuing him a stern warning and forcing him to register, the U.S. border inspectors slapped him in handcuffs and hauled him off to a prison in Laredo. He would spend the next two months in jail, and in January, 2004 he and Maria were married in the prison just before Daou was deported back to Lebanon. As a deportee, he was automatically banned from returning to the United States for at least five years under harsh laws passed in 1996, following the first, unsuccessful terrorist attack on the World Trade Center towers. Desperate to get him back, Maria moved across the border to Nuevo Laredo, and after a year of e-mails and long distance telephone calls to Lebanon, she was able to get permission from the Mexican government to bring him to live with her in Mexico.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: deportation, arabs, nseers

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another Alternet article full of foolishness
Posted by: ICEManCometh on Oct 7, 2008 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see, Arabic individuals terrorized the U.S., and now they're being profiled? MAKES PERFECT FREAKIN' SENSE! Many of them did not follow the law and their immigration status is no longer valid? ARREST, DETAIN, DEPORT! Kris Kobach saw the hole in immigration enforcement at the state and local level for what it was, a huge national security nightmare? HE'S A COMPLETE HERO, and you'd do well to learn from him.

Once again, Alternet posts an article using "true love" as a defense against immigration enforcement and homeland security. Why doesn't our enterprising little Lebanese guy put his efforts toward fixing his wife's ancestral homeland, Mexico? Let's see an article about his efforts there instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President & CEO
Posted by: llsmith11 on Oct 7, 2008 8:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my view, we are allowing the government to frame the immigration problem for us. We must consider that in some cases, such as here, the government is not acting in our own individual best interest.

Thus, the term "illegal" associated with "alien" or "immigrant" is one of the government's invention.

What we as individuals must do is look at the problem from our own perspective. It is my understanding that this has not been done very often and has not be heralded very effectively.

The reality is that foreign nationals are in every recognized nation worldwide, creating a nearly fully integrated polyglot. To somehow require all these people to get their "papers in order" with respect to the local laws of each country is crazy.

There has to be a better, more accommodating, and global solution. Like a national identity card that is accepted worldwide. This different than a passport and should be a smart card with various data on it relevant to the bearer and the country he or she hails from.

Take a look at the end-to-end treatment of the immigration problem that has been prepared by Trigon-International, Inc. This is actionable, affordable, and feasible and more aptly it addresses the problem in situ meaning that the fix goes in without having to reset the pieces on the game board.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The key point:
Posted by: rickiey on Oct 8, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Constitutionally, the court was right; in every other respect -- economically, diplomatically, and morally, it was wrong.

But that is all that matters to the court, and that is all that SHOULD matter.

It is NOT the within the authority of a court to decide if something is right economically, diplomatically or morally. That is the authority of the legislative (and in certain conditions, the executive) branches.

The court is ONLY to rule constitutionally. Anything else is usurping the power of the other branches, and a form of treason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

find anything
Posted by: recordonlineguide on Nov 4, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you looking for an obituary, marriage certificate, or deed of trust? How about declassified CIA documents, or a political candidate's money trail? Whatever public record you might be looking for, I've made your job easier with my Top Ten List of Public Record Search Solutions. It's a great way to streamline your public record search efforts. find Top Ten list of where to find the best public record search databases online : recordonlineguide.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]