Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health & Wellness

How McCain and Obama's Health Plans Would Affect Real People

By Trudy Lieberman , Columbia Journalism Review. Posted September 15, 2008.


A look at the way each candidate's plan might affect your ability to fill prescriptions, find a competent doctor and pay the bills. [Part I]
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This is the first in a series examining how the candidates' health care proposals will affect ordinary people and how the press could cover that angle.

So far, mainstream media coverage of health care during the campaign has been characterized by stenographic reporting -- simply transcribing what the candidates say, buzz words and all. Blogosphere coverage has trended the opposite direction -- way too much wonk talk, angels dancing on the head of a pin-type stuff. What have been missing are the people stories. Exactly how will all these economic and political calculations and pronouncements affect those who struggle daily to fill their prescriptions, find a competent doctor, or pay their medical bills? These are the people whose stories the media have yet to tell.

Plenty of coverage has depicted the McCain and Obama plans in broad brush strokes: McCain wants to rip up the employer-based health care system, replace it with tax credits for families and individuals, and require workers to pay income taxes on the value of their health insurance benefits from employers. He also wants families to make medical decisions. Obama would let people keep insurance from their bosses but make it easier for those who are uninsured to buy coverage through a public plan like Medicare. Neither would require people to carry health insurance (except Obama requires it for kids). Both candidates promise tax subsidies. How big they will be and who they will help is anyone's guess.

Last month, NPR aired just such a broad-brush plan-comparison story, featuring a health care policy researcher who drew distinctions between the two approaches. The most telling point he made was that "we pretty much have the same solutions that we've always had." Okay, the solutions may be shop worn, but that's no excuse for not showing people how they will be affected by them.

To begin what I hope will be an ongoing narrative about the candidates' plans and where ordinary people fit into them, I went to Helena, Arkansas, a town of 6,300 along the Mississippi River, whose population and importance peaked in the early 1900s during the sharecropper era. It's like many old river ports and tiny towns across America, in that the population vanished when the jobs did. There aren't many opportunities to go out and find employment with good insurance, the standard advice for decades. Helena's median family income in 1999 dollars was $21,500, compared to $50,000 for the U.S. at large.

The people I talked to represent the socio-economic strata of the town -- from the head jailer and the garbage collector to the insurance agent and the soybean farmer who owns 5,000 acres. They all have health issues. Most people do. Twenty-seven percent of the population is disabled, and all will be affected one way or another by the strategies for reform pursued by John McCain and Barack Obama.

What struck me was that even with insurance, which many had, people were still paying large medical bills out of pocket, reflecting the big cost shift from those who traditionally pay the health care tab to patients themselves. They are the underinsured, that group of 25 million Americans just now coming into public focus but hardly mentioned by candidates or the press. Another thing stood out: How little they knew about the coming health care battle being waged in their name.

"We're getting socialized medicine like Britain and Canada," one man told me. How did he know? "The people on TV told me," he said. All the words the media have produced are not sinking in. People need to see themselves in the context of the proposals. They need to know what's at stake for them. As Irwin Landau, my former editor at Consumer Reports, reminded me recently: What touches you personally will be more interesting than what is not personal. It will not only be more interesting, but it will help people evaluate the ad messages, the special interest spiels, the propaganda, and the demagoguery that will surely come. Judging from the people I met in Helena, the media have a big job to do going into the election and beyond.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, health care, mccain

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
HR676 or try it with SB840 in Calif.
Posted by: Landbaron on Sep 15, 2008 7:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the meantime I save plenty of money being in good health, not buying insurance and have a pre-arranged marriage (pre-existing conditions don't count then) in case any thing drastic comes along.
If they don't want to try single payer universal coverage, let the present system implode. Employers should give their employees the money to buy their own health insurance if they choose. I wonder what % of the healthy people would actually buy it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't forget HB-311 in Illinois Posted by: bthespoon
Health Care: McCain vs Obama
Posted by: Forestero on Sep 15, 2008 11:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
7 paragraphs and I know as much as I did before. Great writing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your Candidates-Your Health
Posted by: MarilynWalker on Sep 16, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Health policy is a top issue for this campaign, and thank you for your insight on the candidates' policies.

My organization has a resource that may be helpful to you and your readers in preparing to vote. We have asked, and received responses from, both candidates for their positions on health, research, science and its funding as part of our voter education initiative Your Candidates-Your Health.

We have also asked all Congressional candidates to answer similar questions and we have a public opinion poll that shows where Americans stand on these issues.

I hope it will be of use to you. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good article on problems with McCain plan
Posted by: royalbob on Sep 16, 2008 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This just came out today and Bob Herbert picked up on in his Op Ed (link in two parts to fit)

Health Affairs
Cost And Coverage Implications Of The McCain Plan To Restructure Health Insurance

http://content.healthaffairs.org
/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.27.6.w472

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's Missing
Posted by: JosephHill on Sep 16, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I note that Alternet has joined the rest of the media in acknowledging only two candidates. Not even one 'peep' about Nader's 'Medicare for All' plan, in spite of its widespread popularity among citizens polled.

Shouldn't we at least be provided with information on Nader's healthcare plan, and be allowed/trusted to consider its existence. We are not children...and we certainly are not victims of 'information overload' in this campaign.

If the major party candidates have threatened--or been threatened by--use of the term "socialized medicine", why can't we still be filled in on the concept? I wish those who call themselves 'progressives' would act like progressives. Citizens of a democracy ought to be fully informed before deciding who deserves their votes. Otherwise, they are being led to believe that there are only two points-of-view worth considering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's Missing Posted by: SgtCedar
McCain and Palin and Health Insurance
Posted by: SgtCedar on Sep 16, 2008 9:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If McCain's plan was enacted would John McCain and Sara Palin's son be uninsured? Of course not.

Neither John McCain, with a history of cancer, nor Sara Palin's new son, with Down's Syndrome, would be able to get health insurance on the open market. But they would both still be covered by the tax payers. So much for a better health care system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's The Type of Care, & Who Decides, Not Just Who Pays
Posted by: Liberty G on Sep 17, 2008 8:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other countries, well researched complementary and alternative medicine is utilized and paid for as part of the national health plans. This saves lots of money and gets better health results.

Until we consider this approach and stem the flow of money into the coffers of Big Pharm and High Tech corporations, nothing is going to get much better.

At this point, since under Medicare I can't pay the co-pays and deductible and my preferred care of my own body is not allowed anyway, the best I can hope for is not to get hit with a mandate like Hilary Clinton's. At least we're not yet stuck with a big tax bill for "coverage" that is virtually useless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

whisperingsage
Posted by: whisperingsage on Sep 22, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The insured shouldn't have to pay for their own insurance? Is this Alice in Wonderland? I work very hard to avoid cigarrettes, alcohol, chemicals, MSG harmful food additives, sugar, etc, and I have good health as a result. I take care of my own problems. I only need insurance for a broken leg or something serious. I am a nurse, and 90% of people's health is caused by poor choices, things they KNOW are harmful to them, they do anyway. Why shouldn't they pay for their own stupidity? When I tried to help an employer find a more reasonable health insurance for their group coverage, I found out group coverage was about socialism. Those who are healthy and would have low rates, are saddled with the poor choices of the constantly sick who raised everybody's rates. So we all pay one very unfair rate. It's not like I have been healthy all my life, as I grew up I learned I had power over my health and I used my power, by virtue of my choices. If I can do it, others can too. I also use nutrients as medicine, and as a last resort, herbs, massage, chiropractic and energy medicine. I find these far cheaper and more effective than surgery, toxic drugs, etc. For more on this see www.drday.com and you can see how cancer even can be overcome, mind you, this is a cancer SURGEON who refused chemo and radiation when it came to HER.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]