Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health & Wellness

No Wonder Our Hospitals Are a Disaster -- People with Marketing Degrees Are Running Them

By Maggie Mahar, Health Beat. Posted August 15, 2008.


Business school graduates have replaced doctors and public health experts as CEOs of hospitals, often at patients' expense.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This article originally appeared on Health Beat.

In 1970, a Fortune magazine cover story warned the nation: "Much of U.S. medical care, particularly the everyday business of preventing and treating routine illnesses, is inferior in quality, wastefully dispensed, and inequitably financed." That year, a Fortune editorial declared: "The time has come for radical change. ... The management of medical care is too important to leave to doctors who are, after all, not managers to begin with."

This was the beginning of the revolution Paul Starr described in his Pulitzer prize-winning 1982 book, The Social Transformation of American Medicine. In his final chapter, "The Coming of the Corporation," Starr expressed his concern that "those who talked about 'health care planning' in the 1970s now talk about 'health care marketing.' Everywhere one sees the growth of a kind of marketing mentality in health care. And, indeed, business school graduates are displacing graduates of public health schools, hospital administrators and even doctors in the top echelons of medical care organizations.

"The organizational culture of medicine used to be dominated by the ideals of professionalism and voluntarism which softened the underlying acquisitive activity," Starr wrote. "The restraints exercised by those ideals now grow weaker. The 'health center' of one era is the 'profit center' of the next."

In this brave new world of the 1980s, corporate executives would become both the wealthiest and the most powerful actors on the new cultural stage. Hospital CEOs would haul home salaries that made neurosurgeons look like pikers. In health care, as in other industries, CEOs, not physicians, make the decisions, and their goal, Starr suggested, would no longer be better health, but rather, "the rate of return on investments."

Earlier in the 20th century, many hospitals were run by physicians. Today, the vast majority are, as Starr predicted, run by MBAs and other businessmen. Some CEOs have studied hospital administration. Some do a fine job. The very best work well with the doctors in their hospitals.

Rogue CEOs

But today, it is too easy for someone who knows little about medicine -- and cares less -- to take charge of a hospital. Over at Health Care Renewal, Dr. Roy Poses offers a striking example:

Add this to our series of failed health care leaders, from the South Florida Sun-Sentinel:

A top Memorial Regional Hospital administrator caught up in a fraud investigation in the Virgin Islands resigned this week after admitting he spent time in a military prison and lied about it.

Rodney E. Miller, 36, who came to the Hollywood hospital less than a year ago as chief operating officer and a rising star, never disclosed he spent time in a Navy brig on theft charges, Frank Sacco, chief executive of the South Broward Hospital District, said Thursday. Sacco said when he confronted the man he hoped would one day succeed him, Miller admitted his lie and quit the $370,000 job on the spot Tuesday.

Details of Miller's past emerged in a series of stories published this week by the Virgin Islands Daily News that outlined widespread alleged financial abuses by Miller and others at Schneider Regional Medical Center in the Virgin Islands. The newspaper, and an audit by the U.S. Inspector General's Office, found that more than $1 million was improperly diverted to Miller's personal accounts between 2002 and 2007. Also, he received $3.8 million in salary over several years while patients went without basic needs for a lack of money, the newspaper reported.

But it was Miller's failure to disclose a "bad conduct" discharge from the Navy that led to his departure from Memorial Regional, Sacco said. Miller stole another serviceman's credit cards in 1995 and went on a spending spree, then concocted an elaborate scheme to cover his tracks, the Daily News reported. He left the service in 1996 and his discharge, after appeals, became official in 2000.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health care, hospitals, patient care

Maggie Mahar is a fellow at the Century Foundation and the author of Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much (Harper/Collins 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I disagree
Posted by: rickiey on Aug 15, 2008 12:46 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A hospital, as currently run, is a business.

Doctors are trained in the skills of diagnosing and curing people.

They are not trained in the skills of managing people, money or accounts.

It is time to recogize that management isn't something that is "just made up as they go along" but is something that has to be learned, and has very little to do with the actual job being performed by those who are being managed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Got Health Care? Posted by: surfreality
» RE: Got Health Care? Posted by: onevoter
» RE: I disagree ... and I'm an idiot Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: I disagree Posted by: blondesprite
» RE: I disagree Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I disagree Posted by: john mont
» RE: I disagree Posted by: luzmejor
The Truth
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 16, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been an RN for the last 3 years and will soon have my ARNP. Since I was an LPN I have worked in large Hospitals and am always amazed by the "directors" and other administrators that are always in charge of making decisions. I often wonder how many of them got into the positions they have as common sense is usually something they lack in most areas. The majority of the time I feel they just get by on dumb luck alone.

RL
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conyers HR 676- Only Real national Health care Plan
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 16, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Profiteering MUST be elimiated from our healthcare system.
We have lost Medical professionals in the most crucial areas because they are not lucrative or they require the most costly Malpractice insurance - another windfall revenue for Insurance Corps.
It is based on Medicare - which will be more solvent once the Insurance Scammers get their hands out of it's cookie jar.
National Health care is a National Right and a duty of the Federal Gov't to manage. Without a national healthcare system- our labor, thus our economy is in grave danger.
Our nation has the Highest medical Cost, but one of the Lowest Life expectancies and Highest Infant Mortality.
It is time to rid ourslves of the Middlemen who have been skimming off the top and jeporadizing our Citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

an mba should be running a hospital
Posted by: cyr3n on Aug 16, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No offense to the doctors.. but they're not trained to run a business. They may be very smart doctors, but that doesnt qualify them to run the hospital. That being said, the mbas and ceos who run hospitals need to ethical and well-read in their field. I think some hospitals are choosing the wrong people (based on their character) to be at the helm and its giving them all a bad name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hospitals are becoming part of the problem
Posted by: Retired OldGuy on Aug 16, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are three major problems with hospitals on the horizon:

1) They are converting non-profit hospitals to for-profits. In the process they are converting taxpayer assets to shareholder assets without paying the full price for those assets. Sometimes the shareholders pay only 50% of value, sometimes 10%, and the taxpayers lose the balance.

Once they become for-profits, providing patient care is a "cost." Where before they'd charge $100 and provide $90 in care, now they want to cut their costs so, say, $50 goes to the shareholders instead of $10 going to future spending. They do this by reducing nurse-to-patient ratios, use older technology while charging for new technology, and etc.

2) Hospitals are now buying up physician practices so the doctors are now employees of the hospital. Where the doctors once provided the oversight on hospital quality, they now get their paychecks from them. As well, doctors are now paid a productivity bonus. Yep, that's a commission that the hospital rewards the doctors on the basis of how well they keep the profits coming in. CEO says to Docs, "Hey, our bed utilization is low" or "our extra MRI machine isn't getting much use" and good doctors will admit more patients or order more MRIs. Who pays? You do.

3) Hospital B decides that they want more cash coming in. That's profits, remember. So they build a new hospital in an outlying town where Hospital A is the only one in town. No, that's not "competition." In 100% of the cases where an additional hospital has moved in, PATIENT CHARGES HAVE INCREASED! Yes, economies of scale work here too. And then they buy up some of the physicians who were sending patients to the old hospital, which is now running underutilized and costs and charges go up.

Gee, this doesn't sound good, how do they get buy with this? Simple. They own the politicians via their campaign contributions. Liberals call that bribery and payola, conservatives call it free speech.

That's our democracy. Corrupt politicians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the profit motive
Posted by: off-the-radar 2 on Aug 16, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The profit motive almost always trumps values.

Medicine should not be a for-profit business.

Requiring hospital administrators do become "professionally certified" will do virtually nothing to constrain the profit motive but will add a gloss of superficial values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all hospitals are the same.
Posted by: weslen1 on Aug 16, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since April, 2005, I have had to spend a total of 43 days in the hospital, in 6 stays. The hospital here couldn't have been better. When I couldn't get my prescriptions, because of no access to the doctor due to his receptionist being unwilling to relay a message, the people at the hospital arranged for me to get them for free. Hospital personnel contacted me after my release to check up on me. All the doctors who treated me, from general practitioners, to cardiologists, to surgeons to physicians assistants all made sure I was okay, during and after my stay.
When I couldn't pay the bill after the first stay in April '04, the hospital forgave the bill.
When I see things, like that poor woman who collapsed in the waiting room of a hospital and died with no one so much as checking on her and even stepping over her, I KNOW that nothing like that will EVER HAPPEN in the hospitals here. And I have NEVER had to wait more than 15 minutes in the emergency room to be treated either. Just for the record, I am talking about Lakeland Regional Health Center in Niles and Saint Joseph, Michigan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

concerned
Posted by: anniepema on Aug 16, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The older the father the more likely the offspring, especially daughters, will be sick with auto immune disorders, autism, schizophrenia, cancers etc. Preventive medicine is not strong in this country or the world. If men completed fathering babies by 33 there would be less chronic sickness.http://how-old-is-too-old.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The first time I saw a billboard advertising our hospital
Posted by: AnneP on Aug 16, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the only one in our town...as the place to go for sunburn, I knew we'd passed a mark from which there was no retreat. Besides the stupidity of telling someone to tie up emergency rooms with sunburn...you shouldn't get sunburned in the first place. The drug store or your medicine cabinet is the place to go.
If hospitals paid their nurses what they pay their marketing directors...they wouldn't have to worry about the nursing shortage. MBA hospital administrators are what drove me away from nursing. I still miss it but wouldn't put up with the aggravation of being told how to do something that the MBA didn't have a clue as to what he/she was saying. Great article. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's Get the New Age Quackery out of Hospitals
Posted by: kestral on Aug 16, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, many hospitals are promoting questionable medical practices, such as 'energy healing', Reiki, accupuncture, yoga and Tai Chi to their patients.

When my mother had rectal cancer, her oncologist gave her a recipe book that talked about the 'energetic values' of the various colors in fruits and vegetables. When I complained about this claptrap to my mother's oncologist, she promptly removed all other copies of that recipe book for cancer patients. Also, during the hospital stay, a social worker wanted my mother to talk about her 'spirituality'. My mother is a lifelong Lutheran who does not talk about her faith or religion to people she does not know well. She finds the New Age spirituality promoted by Oprah Winfrey and her ilk to be offensive. The prostletizing New Age social worker and was taken aback that my mother did not want to talk about spirituality. The social worker did not get it when my mother said, "Leave Me Alone!" She billed my mother's insurance.

I have a friend who has Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. She entered McLean Hospital's partial hospitalization treatment program for this disorder, expecting that she would receive Exposure and Response Prevention therapy. There is a considerable body of research showing that it is an effective treatment. Unfortunately, between the time my friend was evaluated for the program and when she was admitted, the psychiatrist who developed the treatment took ill. Instead of getting ERP, my friend was treated according to quasi-Buddhist/New Age principles and ERP was downplayed. The quazi-Buddhist/New Age treatment had not been shown to be safe or effective. My friend left McLean's Hospital in worse shape than she entered.

I have a friend who had been treated at Spaulding Rehabilitation's outpatient pain clinic in Medford, MA. She told me that they forced her to participate in yoga and Tai Chi classes even though she was physically unable to do. My friend said that she was also given so-called 'energy healing' treatments there.. She could not refuse these treatments without getting into trouble. Her insurance paid for these treatments.

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital was a well-regarded rehabilitation hospital. Yet they have a history of promoting questionable medical practices. In 2005, an employee of Spaulding Rehabilitation Center complained that Spaulding was offering a workshop on so-called 'energy healing'. The employee felt that, to complain to management about this would endanger his or her job, so the employee contacted The James Randi Educational Foundation for help. Here is a link to James Randi's description of the incident: http://www.randi.org/jr/200510/101405same.html#5

New Age Nuthead medicine is popular amongst hospital administrators because patients pay for this claptrap totally out-of-pocket. This means that there's no need for billing; no need for medical records. Cash on the barrel head. The promoters of New Age Nuthead medicine claim that it makes people 'feel better'. Yes, it can make people feel better--that's because of the Placebo Effect.

For more information about questionable medical practices, please visit the website Quackwatch. For Stephen Barrett, MD, a retired psychiatrist, fighting medical quackery has been one of his passions.
Here's a link to his web site: http://www.quackwatch.com/

Let's work to get the questionable medical treatments out of hospitals, whether they are promoted by big pharma, New Age Nutheads or others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, like statin drugs? Posted by: sausage
» I call it Enlightened Posted by: zenbruder
Reply to an MBA Should Be Running A Hospital
Posted by: maggiemahar on Aug 16, 2008 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some MBAs can be good hospital directors, but only if they know a great deal about medicine, work closely with a panel of the hospitals' physicians, and most of all, understand that medicine is Not a Business.

Businesses have one goal: to make a profit, and to grow profits. This is what shareholders expect.

Healthcare has one goal: to keep people healthy. If you are good at keeping people healthy, they will spend fewer days in your hospital. They will undergo fewer procedures and tests while they are there (because your hospital will get the diagnosis right at the beginnig of their stay). They will be less likely to need to be re-admitted. They will be less likely to develop infections.

If you succeed in all of the above, you make less money.

This is the inherent difference betweeen your goal as a hospital CEO and your goal as the CEO of another business.

Not long ago Dr, Don Berwick, the head of the Institute for Health Care Improvement, told me about going to visit an excellent hospital in Sweden. The CEO of the Swedish hospital picked him up at the airport and as they drove to the hospital the CEO was talking very excitedly about how this year, his hospital was using fewer hospital beds than it had last year. In other words, more beds were empty.

He was very pleased because he knew that this meant his hospital was doing a better job of keeping the community healthy through various preventive care clnics that it offered
And he also knew that he had empty beds because patients who did become sick were being treated efficiently--without errors, infections, etc., and so had shorter stays.

In the U.S. an MBA might well be horrified by that story. An MD would udnerstand that this CEO was doing his job--helping to keep a community healthy. That is a hospital's mission.

I agree that most MD's are not very good managers. But most MBA's can't entirely grasp the notion that they are not there to increase profits; they are there to serve the community. It takes a special person to run a hospital and unless they understand the medical mission, it really doesn't matter how good they are at "managing a business."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» On The Right Track Posted by: NoPCZone
health care is not and shouldn't be a business
Posted by: deang on Aug 16, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need centralized, universal health care with no profit motive, like most other countries have. That commenters here are still maintaining that only businessmen should be in charge of things is disheartening. Yes, doctors should focus on the health issues, but if hospitals were strictly public again, public administrators, not businessmen, would take care of the planning and management, with decisions determined in large part by doctors' input about the entire population's health needs.

It strikes me that similar problems plague our privatized prison system, where the profit-driven goal is to keep as many prisoners in for as long as possible, whether it's just or not.

America needs to get over the profit motive for necessary social functions. It does nothing but harm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, no shit, Sherlock!
Posted by: sausage on Aug 16, 2008 1:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Idiots with MBA degrees running hospitals is one of the primary reasons health care suck in the US of A!

Idiots with MBA degrees running anything is one of the primary reason everything in the US of A sucks!

George W. Bush is the first president in history with a Master of Business Administration from the Harvard School of Business and that is one of the primary reasons the US of A sucks, period!

Every asshole with a Master of Business Administration should go take a long walk off a very short pier. The world would be a better place without'em

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, no shit, Sherlock! Posted by: zenbruder
It's a money thing
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 16, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks go into medicine because there's a big paycheck in it. It's very easy to tell if you have a Doc that's in it for the money or in it as a calling. The money doc will prescribe meds that don't belong being used together,the Doctor who's doing it as a calling will work their ass off for you and make sure your meds are correct,safe,and be concerned about you total wellbeing,without having a 'god' complex.
The same is true for nurses,clinics and hospitals, The ones in it for the money have paitentcare so bad you would'nt take the family pet there. They release patients with little regard to their actual condition,offer poor or no after care and send you to the accounting office before they release you.
If you want real healing,buy some herbalremidies books,teach yourself alternative medicine and understand the value of 'preventive medicine'. If you want a walletectomy and a trip to the slab,go see a doctor at an insurance only hospital.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, that's what to expect when BIG GOVERNMENT and the monied interests churn your taxpayer money !
Posted by: jwverez on Aug 16, 2008 8:25 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is a klutz for failing to accept a doctor for president, RON PAUL. Or the least the author could have done is given Nader's views a chance. If the author cared to end the hostile takeover of hospitals, the names Nader and Paul would have been given a show !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would rather die than go to the Emergency room
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 16, 2008 8:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been treated so badly in emergency rooms on several different occasions. Plus, in case the 'administrators' of hospitals don't understand this, sometimes it takes more than 10 or 15 minutes to talk to our docs as that is all we are allowed these days. My fibromyalgia went undiagnosed and over-looked until it became incapacitating. Very sadly the Hypocratic Oath matters little these days and Angels of Mercy are no more, or at least not allowed or given time to do their jobs properly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Merg
Posted by: Merg on Aug 17, 2008 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An Rn with an MBA would make an ideal Hospital Administrator/CEO. It is important to note that RN's are the most trustworthy members of the Health Care Team among the general public (for good reason) It should also be noted that RN's, unlike doctors or other current hospital executives have NEVER been incentiviced (i.e. given bonuses) to give BAD CARE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah, but... Posted by: medstudgeek
More regulation is the answer
Posted by: medstudgeek on Aug 17, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There tends to be a focus (especially in this country) on the characteristics of the people heading the system instead of the characteristics of the system itself. There's no effective way to subject leaders to an ethics test; sociopaths are great at appearing ethical. The best thing we can do is spotlight the worst abuses and make them illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More regulation is the answer Posted by: maggiemahar
Suspicious
Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net on Aug 17, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a resident of Ohio, I am suspicious of the Cleveland Clinic. It is much in the news for its constant acquiring of what seems to be as much land and as many other medical institutions near or not so near it, as it can get. I have been there twice for an exam and each time was treated like a worthless, no good subhuman. (I am female, divorced, with a B.A. in business and chemistry, have held good jobs and been highly respected. I also had insurance.) Thus I wonder what their highest priority is. Is it good health care, or is it making maximum profits? I do know that those who like CC are those who are "somebody," not an unknown as I was to them.

However, I have noticed in my home town (not Cleveland) that nearly all doctors are control freaks. One doctor did volunteer to me that the first and most important thing medical students are taught, now that pharmaceutical companies control the medical system, is to control their patients. I can verify that; behind closed doors they are abusive and pushers of pills. They do not want questions or comments. They want submissiveness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I THOUGHT EVERYBODY KNEW. YES, MBAs RUN THE CORPORATE HOSPITALS. WHEN RONALD
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 17, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reagan left California he changed school law. School administrators need only be MBAs. As soon as he changed the law an out of state MBA placed money in an account for school board members to run on. They did. They hired him. How much he stole is still not known. The California teachers association saw to it he was fired. But, the Reagan law remains on the books. Out of staters weren't supposed to be stealing in California. That is reserved for the natives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unhealthy and Sick = $$$ for your doctor
Posted by: VH on Aug 17, 2008 8:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Ms. Mahar's assessment. I'd also like to pull back even more, and give a broader view of the dismal state of our healthcare system.

The plain truth is, new medical school graduates (your future doctors) cannot afford to be patient oriented. Patients are no more than walking profit centers, and the MBAs running hospitals are perfectly suited to view the patient as such.

New M.D.s have such enormous medical school loans after graduation that they are forced into servitude to the hospital/pharmaceutical profit agenda. This agenda sold to the American public via the self-appointed “experts” on health, the AMA. Yet, the AMA is simply an organized group of profiteers, who will discredit any non-pharma intervention as “quackery.”

Thus, per the AMA, all sound medicine is pharma based, or it is quackery. (I wonder how the physicians in Asia think of this.) And, it is curiously convenient that all pharma “research” is strictly driven to generate drug revenues.

So where is the doctor in this mix? Where is the informed medical professional who is trained in all aspects of healing and prevention? In the West, that doctor is Non-existent. Pharma essentially writes medical school curricula, leaving out non-pharma sanctioned science.

Thus, in essence, our doctors - our AMA appointed health experts - are simply highly trained pharmaceutical reps, groomed to tailor a broad range of drugs to your presenting ailment. Even if your ailment can be treated, or even prevented, by a non-pharma solution.

Is it any wonder pharma is richer and patients are sicker than ever?

The doctors’ massive medical school debt does not allow them to stray from this paradigm. Even if they were trained in preventative therapies (which they aren’t), pharma makes sure a drug is available to mold the doctor and patient into a drug-dependent mentality only.

Solution: as foreign as it may sound to us, the solution starts with medical school training. It should be free, as it is in Europe. Pharma should be extracted from medical schools and professional practice. The physicians will be free to treat the patient without constraint. The profession must once again lure those who are passionate about healthcare rather than those seeking the allure of the “Physician” status or some perceived salary.

As the past 50 years have now shown us, some industries simply should not be for-profit. Medicine (and medical research) is one. *Patients simply must not be considered profit centers.* Otherwise, where is the incentive to prevent disease? Like another poster said, if we continue this way, soon all our children will be on cholesterol medicines (i.e., statins) or insulin or both. Sickening and despicable. Publicly funded studies already project that by 2042 every single American will be overweight. And we pay the most for healthcare in the world? If medicine were treated like any other industry, consumers would have hounded them out of business by now for such horrifically pathetic results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"We heal NOTHING!!! We cure NOTHING!!!"
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 18, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out a great movie from 1971--"The Hospital". It stared George C. Scott and was written by Paddy Chayefsky. It predicted with prophetic clarity where the American medical care system was headed.

Listen to Scott's monologue with the above quote, and watch for the doctor who is more of a investor/businessman then a CEO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SEVENTY PER CENT OF THE RESPECTABLE POLLS IN 1992-93 SAID
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 18, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that we needed federal intervention in the health care market. The 30 percent won. What an interesting measure of democracy's failure.

Remember the title of Pat Buchanan's book; "Its a Republic, not a Democracy". That's candid. Not honest but candid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MBAs
Posted by: Dadster3 on Aug 18, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The MBA is, IMHO, the most soulless academic degree ever conceived. At the risk of overgeneralizing and tainting the few MBA holders who may actually give a shit about something besides the bottom line, the best way to instill an ethic of responsibility & compassion into business and goverment is to stop hiring MBAs.

Yeah, I know. Fat F--king chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

allen
Posted by: pursah on Aug 18, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The profit motive is not inherently evil in and of itself. BUT, without proper checks and balances and audit by a central power, like a government, it becomes the GREED motive and eventually the whole system self-destructs.

We are seeing the fruits of 40 years of "Get the Government Off Our Backs (which translates into KILL THE CHECKS AND BALANCES) initiated by smiling Ronnie Raygun. And system-wide, nothing is working right in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

allen
Posted by: pursah on Aug 18, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The profit motive is not inherently evil in and of itself. BUT, without proper checks and balances and audit by a central power, like a government, it becomes the GREED motive and eventually the whole system self-destructs.

We are seeing the fruits of 40 years of "Get the Government Off Our Backs (which translates into KILL THE CHECKS AND BALANCES) initiated by smiling Ronnie Raygun. And system-wide, nothing is working right in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

snakes in suits
Posted by: jimsenter on Aug 19, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading the story about Mr. Miller's criminal mismanagement I was reminded quite strongly of a book I recently read, Babiak's Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. His coauthor was the psychiatrist who actually developed the instruments to assess psychopathy so they know what they're talking about.

The point is, Miller is not just a bad apple. The present corporate structure, with its massive bureaucracy and anonymous workers, with its profit maximization mantra, demands that people act like they have no conscience, and rewards the true psychopaths with large salaries and promotions. (One of the chapters is entitled "I'm not a psychopath. I just act like one" I laughed so hard it hurt when I read that.] The corporate structure creates an environment in which truly unhinged people are free to wreak their havoc.

as long as we think this is just a matter of bad apples, of rogue administrators, we misunderstand our situation and will be hamstrung in our attempts to deal with it.

SOME THINGS, LIKE HEALTH CARE, LIKE DRINKING WATER, LIKE ELECTRICITY, ARE SIMPLY TOO IMPORTANT TO BE LEFT TO THE CHAOS OF THE MARKETPLACE. As long as we fail to acknowledge this, we help create the space in which the snakes in suits are free to sodomize us.

with this, I in no way mean to suggest that Rodney Miller is a psychopath. That is a diagnosis that must be left to the professionals who have met him. What I will say is, from what I read in the Virgin Island Daily News, he sure was acting like a person with no conscience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]