Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Low Sperm Counts and Deformed Penises: The Chemical Industry Has a Hold on Your Reproductive Future

By Joshua Zaffos, Colorado Springs Independent. Posted June 26, 2008.


From car seats to condoms, nasty compounds have invaded our lives. Hormones are going haywire, and our human future is at risk.
Advertisement

I am half the man my father is.

This disturbing fortune came to me about five years ago, but not from an odd relative or a sadistic girlfriend. Instead, this dinner-table diagnosis came from Theo (short for Theodora) Colborn, an internationally known scientist who has helped develop the field of research exploring how chemical compounds interfere with the hormones that guide human development.

Known as endocrine disruption, chemicals found in computer screens and car seats, shower curtains and shampoo, plastic water bottles and prophylactics are skewing our odds against cancers and causing developmental delays and reproductive roadblocks, including declining sperm counts.

So, when Colborn informed me of my inferior manhood, I took consolation in the fact that she was indicting my entire generation -- and her own -- for loading our natural environment, our workplaces and our homes with tens of thousands of chemical compounds without really having a clue about what we're doing. Our Stolen Future, the book Colborn co-authored in 1996, first delivered this bad news to the general public.

More than a decade later, scientists are still conducting experiments and measuring results, from cramped basement labs at universities to expansive high-country lakes in the wilderness. The hypotheses generally aren't questions of whether chemicals are pervading and persisting in the environment, but rather how severely they are stunting our development and health. The federal government has investigated these questions with timidity, if not contempt, operating a regulatory system practically beholden to the chemical industry.

With half of my manhood at stake and hopes for a better assessment in the future, I'm wondering how we can heed the warning signs and reverse our chemical course.

A day in my half-life

For years, I started off each day drinking coffee out of a metallic cup, likely coated with bisphenol-A, a chemical commonly used to line plastic bottles and other food and beverage cans and containers. Anyone who has lugged around a Nalgene bottle made of polycarbonate plastic, trying to save the Earth one paper cup at a time, has gotten his or her share of bisphenol-A, which leaches from containers into liquids to enter our bodies. A U.S. Centers for Disease Control study detected bisphenol-A in 93 percent of all Americans.

Inside us, bisphenol-A mimics estrogen, plugging into hormone receptors; this is endocrine disruption. In pregnant or breastfeeding mothers and young and prepubescent children, it can have critical impacts, rewiring our developmental profiles and opening up our risks for cancers and physical and behavioral abnormalities. Lab tests suggest that chronic, low-dose exposure to bisphenol-A -- like drinking out of a coated cup or polycarbonate bottle daily -- may cause women to have greater chances of breast cancer and polycystic ovary syndrome, a leading cause of infertility, and men to have increased odds of prostate cancer and reduced sperm counts.

That's a lot to think about during the day's first cup of coffee or sip of water. Now I try to stick to ceramic mugs and glasses.

As my body starts to properly caffeinate in the mornings, I usually sit in front of a laptop and do whatever it is writers do to put off writing -- checking e-mails and boxscores -- until I'm warmed up. As a computer warms up, particles inside start to fly and some catch a ride on dust. For years, I breathed in polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from my laptop.

These compounds are flame-retardants, nearly universally used in couch cushions, televisions, cars and carpets. PBDEs have similar chemical structures to thyroid hormones, and, according to lab tests, they can lower our bodies' production of the real thing.

Over time, thyroid-hormone deficiencies can hurt metabolism. Hypothyroidism causes fatigue, depression, anxiety, hair loss and a waning libido. Women with low thyroid-hormone counts are five times more likely to have children with IQs that qualify them as mildly retarded, according to one study. A 2005 experiment found that a single low dose of a common PDBE given to rats in utero resulted in a class of hyperactive rodents with persistent low sperm counts.

Contemplating my future as a fat, bald, sad, edgy, dull and dim-witted bachelor isn't necessarily cause for perilous concern. Still, a generation's lacking aesthetics and sex drive is a wicked trade-off for the low combustion factors of our workspaces, living rooms and vehicles.

On the mornings when words don't flow from my fingertips, I know it's time to take a shower, an effective and healthy distraction. I used to have a vinyl shower curtain and wash with whatever shampoo was cheapest from the supermarket. Both those products generally contain phthalates (pronounced "tha-lates"), compounds that add flexibility and plasticity to fragrances and cosmetics and almost anything made out of vinyl, including children's toys and IV bags.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: endocrine disruptors, fertility, toxic products, toxins, chemical industry, reproductive health

Joshua Zaffos writes from Fort Collins, Colorado. His work has appeared in High Country News, The Denver Post, Fly Fisherman and Orion.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Are you saying..?
Posted by: kwalla on Jun 26, 2008 1:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That my penis shouldn't have two heads?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you saying..? Posted by: Moira61
» double the Viagra Posted by: fomented
» RE: Are you saying..? Posted by: Luther Blissett
» Hey, kwalla, I can't tell from your name Posted by: Robert_Hoogenboom@leftfoot.com.au
Live far from the civilised West
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 26, 2008 2:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And watch your erections soar like a B2 bomber. I lived for three years with a tribal people far away from the West. And was constantly horny and healthy. It was such a great experience: I was very fit, and because of the crap of the West, my sexual energy was in full force. It was amazing! It's never been the same since living in a city. It is really boring being around so many women who are so lost in their own worlds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ohh... Posted by: Moira61
» RE: cripes Posted by: kiel
» This has gotta be.... Posted by: morticia
Not Just a Pretty Face
Posted by: artie on Jun 26, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The warnings that you mention that the EPA inadequately - if at all - mention resounds also in "Not Just a Pretty Face," the book indicting the cosmetics industry.

We should learn from lead-poisoning's contribution to the decline of the Roman Empire ...
Bushaligula???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Headline is Sensationalistic
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 26, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree that we need to continue to study endocrine impacts of synthetic chemicals publishing fearmomgering headlines about "deformed penises" is not worthy of AlterNet editorial

These are animal studies and they may or may not be relevant to humans.

The hormones that I worry about most are those ingested by naive patients prescribed by their physicians who have been duped by an irresponsible and greedy pharmaceutical industry.

So please spare the excessive fears of drinking beverages out of plastic containers. Just don't accomapany your beverage with a prescribed hormone.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Headline is Sensationalistic Posted by: drricklippin
» Caps does not an argument make Posted by: Biflspud
» RE: Headline is Sensationalistic Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» In the field... Posted by: fanny666
» Sensationalist yes, but. . . Posted by: SpiderWoman
» SENSATIONALISM SOLVES NOTHING! Posted by: drricklippin
Same old story
Posted by: markwardt on Jun 26, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't checked completely but e.g. PBDEs are prohibited in the E.U. That shows it is possible
to replace and to restrict dangerous chemicals. The story that the oh so poor industry will suffer from such a wicked ban is a myth. The problem for the U.S. is the tight interdependence between industry und politics thet prevents you from progress with respect to ecology. We don't have it to that extent in Old Europe. Yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Experiment Continues!
Posted by: williameon on Jun 26, 2008 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recind 400+ Pollution laws!
Pump poison into the environment and the food supply wait to see what happens?
Chemicals, pesticides, fungicides, franken foods,
Terminator genes, Nuclear waste, radioactive isotopes, corn syrup, hydrogenated oil, PCBs, pollution, medications, sleeping pills, mood modifiers, chem-trails and rocket fuel.
Search for a cure instead of the cause of desease and what do you get?
Sickness,
Deformities!
Sick people
Sick children
sick babies!

A
Cancer,
Diabetes and obesity epidemic
To name a few
Oh!
My!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Metallic means of metal. Posted by: nightgaunt
Asthma
Posted by: benzene on Jun 26, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What?

All of those words up above about federal dysregulation of chemicals and the deleterious side effects of those chemicals, and not one word about asthma?

Sure, hit people with the buzzwords: cancer, deformed, and penis, but ignore pervasive conditions that are already readily apparent and have been for years?

Wow, what journalistitude!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Asthma ... and other things Posted by: banshee413
» No, you don't understand Posted by: banshee413
"drinking coffee out of a metallic cup"
Posted by: war_on_tara on Jun 26, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm having trouble even picturing a "metallic" coffee cup. The several here are all ceramic; of course there may be problems from their being "Made in..." no, whaddaya know, Taiwan, Mexico and Thailand... not a "Made in China" in the bunch! Maybe I look at these things after all, before I buy them. Anyway, all these will BREAK if someone drops them.

But what does a "metallic" coffee cup look like? In the military I remember we had some kind of unbreakable plastic-ized coffee cups - substantial, but had a hollow sound if dropped, didn't break - & even those don't seem metallic in any way, but is that what he means?

(meant to make a new comment - not enough coffee!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Researching reasons takes time
Posted by: warble on Jun 26, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, it takes no time to dash on a perfume, breathe in nuclear dust, apply moisterizers, eat and drink chemical additives, frolic with plastics, and it takes no times to embrace the chemical world without even realizing it. The problem is that researching the causes of death and diseases takes a long time and lots of money. Even when you think you might have the cause, you can never be sure.You can still splash manly aftershave, breathe in its intoxicating fumes, and die of lung cancer or homonal disfunction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, it will possibly lead to some regulation...
Posted by: phatkhat on Jun 26, 2008 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if men's penises may be deformed by these chemicals.

When the deleterious effects are seen in females, no one worries too much, but if it affects a penis...! Thank goodness men are starting to have something to worry about, too. Maybe we will get some relief from the toxic overload.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gee... Posted by: Q30
» RE: Gee... Posted by: loxias
» RE: Gee... Posted by: jennyfox
» RE: Gee... Posted by: oceanwaves99999
» RE: Gee... Posted by: jennyfox
High time ... !
Posted by: stellabloo on Jun 26, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... altho this does not fall in the current "news" category, I am gathering that this is news to many of you?

Maybe Americans should sit up and take notice of the compounds that Canada and the EU are suddenly labelling as toxic or banning outright? Why are pthalates OK in the US but not in the EU? Maybe they know something you don't know?

As for accusations of fear-mongering, please note that the medical establishment makes SUBSTANTIAL cash treating all these new cancers. How about that ultimate in consumer hypocrisy, the Monsanto-sponsored Pink Ribbon Campaign - anyone see the teensiest problem with this concept?

The notion of sexually deformed fish isn't anything new either; typically it exists downstream from any large wastewater outfall. Present-day wastewater treatment does not remove persistent volatile organics, such as those found in cleaners and pharmaceuticals, most notoriously the estrogens in oral contraceptives. Yes, water does purify thru evaporation eventually, but most rivers have a LONG way to go before they reach the sea - hint hint.

While we're at it, I have a few other long-standing axes to grind: Why are carcinogenic flame-retardants mandated in everything EXCEPT cigarettes? Why are tobacco companies still allowed to add flame ACCELERANTS with such a long-standing history of accidental death or wildfire directly caused by their product? Did you know that tobacco companies sponsored the "Keep America Litter-free" campaign, with the condition that tobacco butts be EXEMPTED? That's right, it's perfectly legal to throw away your non-biodegradable, toxic, and flammable butts!

Also, while we're on the topic of health and stupid laws, how about some hype on the long-term effects of ALCOHOL? Say, vs. pot? Did you know that if all Americans suddenly drank responsibly, in moderation and only if of legal age, that alcohol sales would suddenly decline by 40%?

No, the US government is NOT interested in your health. Not at all, at all. After all, they don't have to pick up the bill for your health care, do they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: High time ... ! Posted by: AvalonSeeker
Endocrine distruption = Weight Gain
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 26, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article, but it is too bad he didn't mention how these chemicals can cause weight gain, except incorporated in the fat, bald joke. Plug in bisphenol-A and childhood obesity into a search engine. There are several articles out there. I believe there is a certain type of genetically fat person that is healthy. But I also believe there are some people who have gained weight as a result of a harmful environmental factors. The pathway is chemicals = weight gain/metabolic disruption = heart disease,diabetes,cancer. Except all we focus on this society is the SYMPTOM - weight gain, instead of the real cause. That is like trying to cure measles by erasing spots. It is not surprizing when groups like the American Council of Science and Health, funded by the chemical companies point us to lifestyle. They are just deflecting the real issues to save themselves. Until we start looking beyond the whole calories in vs out baloney, the morality surrounding obesity will protect the chemical industry as wall as continue to fatten the wallets of the power-elite via the weight loss industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interview with Frederick Vom Saal, PhD (Feb. 1998)
Posted by: nochicagoboys on Jun 26, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do yourself a favor and read the linked interview with Frederick Vom Saal, PhD. The interview was conducted in February 1998 (yes, the dangers have been known at least since then) by Doug Hamilton, producer of Frontline's "Fooling With Nature." I've included an excerpt to peak your interest. The interview is totally revealing, and implicates the chemical processing industry, specifically Dow Chemical Corporation, a major producer of bisphenol-A (BPA), in attempting to cover-up Vom Saal's findings.

DH: So you're saying that the hormone that has the clearest link to breast cancer, the hormone that is responsible for sexual development in any animal or human, is found in plastics?

FvS: Absolutely. The plastic materials, if they are polycarbonates, are made with this chemical bisphenol-A. And you can think of polycarbonate as a house made of bricks. Essentially you take this brick, this building block, which is bisphenol-A, and you link it together with other bisphenol-A molecules. That's a polymerization reaction. The bisphenol-A is the monomer used to construct these plastic materials. When it's attached to another one, that forms a polymer. And unfortunately in the process of making these plastics not all of the bisphenol-A gets linked together. So you put your food or other material in the plastic and it absorbs the unreacted bisphenol-A into it. And now in your food is a sex hormone.

DH: And what are you finding to be the effect?

FvS: Okay, the chemical bisphenol-A passes out of the plastic or out of the dental sealant that's put on your child's teeth or out of the lining of cans, into the food or liquid that's in contact with the plastic. Now the important point about detection by instrumentation of the bisphenol-A is that, based on our research, the ability of the current instruments used to monitor for bisphenol-A in food is a much lower level of detection than what our animals are able to detect. It's a huge difference as a matter of fact. So that you can put food that you have in contact with plastic into a chemical analysis and say there is no plastic material there. We extract from that same food, put it into animals and we get a big effect. The animals are more sensitive to the chemicals than the machinery. So detection limits, where people say our machine didn't detect this, doesn't mean it's not there and doesn't mean that it won't damage your baby. We have shown that in our experiments.

DH: So the plastics we use in daily life, the baby bottles, the food containers, leach chemicals into the food at levels that cause effects in lab animals?

Click "interview" link, above, and read the total interview.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BRAVE NEW WORLD: FACT OR FICTION???
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 26, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The required school reading list, in the '70s, included books such as A brave new world, 1984, Fahrenheit 451, Animal farm...I asked myself why, what is the purpose??? Were these books, the plans of diaobolical leaders, or were they a warning, of things to come??? Or, To prepare us??? or a failed attempt, to get us off of our ASSES, to stop it??? If science, and technology, destroys our ability to reproduce, than "A BRAVE NEW WORLD" IS EMINENT!!! Big brother is watching us, and controlling us with interactive, plasma flat screen T.V.s??? Are we not controlled by "SOMA"??? Are you ready for Ford baby factory??? And the end of the family??? America, has outlawed NATURE and legalized, evey man made poison imaginable!!! Was Star trek, warning us to prepare, for our own demise??? WILL GOD DESTROY THOSE WHO ARE DESTROYING THE EARTH???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If the author is so worried about chemical exposure
Posted by: Ayla87 on Jun 26, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does he comsume caffine daily? Or is his heart not as important to him as his genitals so clearly are. (SOURCE)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough with the studies already
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 26, 2008 10:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many more years must we continue to "study" these and other issues that are affecting our collective health? Everyday we see the "affects" of these chemicals in our lives and those of the ones that we love. They show up as retardation, cancer, endocrine & thyroid issues etc., must we continue to let the "free market" operate recklessly until disaster happens? Or are we to continue to believe that the "free market" will police itself?

Hello, do we not have proof everyday about "free market" ideology run amok(S&L scandals, Randy Duke Cunnigham, our current $4.00 gas prices, oh yeah)? Yes, 100 years ago people still had cancers and other diseases, however, the rates at which these illnesses are occurring today are probably higher than they should be because of all of these assaults on our bodies. While some may justify and say that the rates are relative to the population, if you really pay attention Europeans don't necessarily have the same rates of disease that we have here in America.

As we are now facing issues of climate change maybe this yet something else to add to the list to concern ourselves with. Over the last 30 years there has been a "war on government" interference that has resulted in the dismantling of regulations designed to protect the public safety from all industries that are uncontrolled. This is a lesson that our grand-parents and parents learned that we have forgotten at our own peril.

Yes, better living thru chemistry at our own risk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not just penises
Posted by: cyr3n on Jun 26, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
birth control patches, pills, and rings lower a woman's libido. The effects may not be immediate but 3-5 years down the line it makes a huge difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: not just penises Posted by: MartianBachelor
Zero Population Growth -- Worldwide
Posted by: jmmartin on Jun 26, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scary story. It's beginning to look like P. D. James was prescient when she wrote Children of Men, recently made into a fine film by Alfonso Cuaron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Delightful rewards of capitalism and American ingenuity
Posted by: DesertStone on Jun 26, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans with their capitalist greed have managed to poison the whole planet yet still look down their noses at people who live simple lives insisting their ways are superior. Fifty years from now they’ll figure out how to build a house without polluting half the planet and giving ten people a fatal illness then they’ll pretend they invented the idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jun 26, 2008 8:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bought a plastic coffeemaker a few years ago. Shortly I began to experience very bad headaches...the pain wrapped around my neck and got worse every day. Around the third month of owning this coffeemaker, I peered inside it, as I was going to pour vinegar into it to clean it, and I saw black mold, about the size of a nickel, in splotches. I threw the coffee maker out and got a perker. Headaches immediately got better. I can't say whether the plastic compounds or the mold - or both - were to blame. And I wonder if that type of plastic was a good environment in which mold could proliferate easily, due to its chemical composition. I will never know, but I am getting as far away from plastic as I can.

This article highlights the problems we are having with chemical living. The hippies were always right....recycle, use canning jars, use glass and ceramic wares for everything...simplify and eat things that are as close to their natural state as possible.

Capitalism with its exuberance has brought invention after invention - and many beautiful things....but sometimes we just need to leave things as they are...or recognize how the most common things (glass, etc.) were always the best anyway.

We have unwittingly filled our society with endocrine disruptors in the search for better living through chemicals. Now we need to re-empower the FDA and NIH to conduct studies that are needed - and to ban these substances as quickly as possible so we can get them out of our bloodstreams. This is a big part of better healthcare - not just healthcare reform, but fixing external problems such as these.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A couple of thoughts
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 27, 2008 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do neuroendocrinology research at the University of Colorado, the building next door to the developmental endocrinology people cited in the article. Just thought I'd share some random, semi-coherent thoughts. I thought this was a pretty good article. Definitely sensationalist, but I guess that's just how everybody reports science.

By the way here are Links to the journal articles written by Dave Norris, the main endocrine-disruption guy at the U of Colorado- Boulder. In case you're interested.

They don't know what's causing the trans-sexual fish. "Chemicals" from the waste water plant is probably a safe bet, but for all we know it could be related to temperature. It's probably a combination of things, and human pollution is quite probably part of the story. Since a common finding just from the field work was that there were way more females than males, birth control pill residue in urine is a suspect. For example, on one day out, of 39 fish they took downstream of the Boulder WasteWater Treatment Plant, 29 were female and 4 were "intersex" (may be ovaries containing testicular tissue or an incompletely transformed testis). Although my personal feeling is that the Colorado press, which is very conservative and hates Boulder for being so liberal, ran with that story - SLUTTY BIRTH-CONTROL TAKING BOULDER FEMINISTS RUINING NATURE - for their own reasons. I do think the research is important, if only to improve how we treat waste water, which is going to continue to be a big deal for the human species. We have separate glassware that we use for solutions which include corticosterone, the main hormone we study. You can't wash it off the glass, even with soap, scrubbing, hot water, etc. They are very sticky molecules.

Many things "mimic estrogen" to one degree or another. yams and soybeans, for example.

The fact that bisphenol-A is found in 93% of Americans to me is a perverse type of GOOD news- there is no pathology shared by 93% of the population, and so it's probably pretty harmless at low doses. There is some evidence that it contributes to adipose tissue build-up (fat) and that it is bad for sperm ... in both cases, it might be because of effects on mitochondia in cells.

Anything that effects an endocrine system is bound to have pretty profound effects. Pretty much by definition, hormones are very sticky, hard-to-get-rid-of molecules, and they are transcription factors meaning that their job is to turn genes on and off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A couple of thoughts Posted by: donnambirdlady
» RE: A couple of thoughts Posted by: fanny666
» RE: A couple of thoughts Posted by: oceanwaves99999
Nature always finds a way
Posted by: tomkara on Jun 28, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether through disease, calamities, or the folly of mankind, our planet's explosive population must be curbed. Among mankind's follies is his unwise use of resources and polluting the planet with chemicals which cause reproductive harm (ironically aiding in population reduction, both his own and that of other species on which mankind depends). I personally favor mandatory human contraception after puberty plus voluntary sterilization programs with financial incentives at age 18. And tax credits for not having children. And extra taxes on those who do. We do not need 'zero population growth'. We need immediate substantial REDUCTION in population through natural attrition and vastly reduced reproduction. And of course, policies which require clean energy, clean food, holistic healthcare, and a political revolution favoring rational governance. Unfortunately, a crisis will almost certainly be required to change our present ways. Philip Wylie said as much. Europe knows as much. It took the horrors of fascism to give Europe a progressive edge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Urban Myth #3
Posted by: Urban Myth #3 on Jun 28, 2008 10:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very good Kwalla - I think your penis is allowed as many heads as it wants (or needs) - until, of course, you mention this to God.
The quaint 'taint' area is more commonly known as the peritonitis.
Logic and ages of health practice teach that any swab should go backward from the genitalia to the anus, thus reducing the risk of infection from two close yet mutually exclusive areas - clean undies might help some too! Whew - Have a nice day

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think that's "Perineum" Posted by: fanny666