|
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
South Koreans More Concerned About American Beef Safety Than Americans Are
Share and save this post:
Also in Health and Wellness
Earning Less and Dying Younger: How the Growing Strain on America's Middle Class Is Pummeling Our Health
Maggie Mahar
McCain Campaign's Plan for Universal Coverage: Change the Definition of 'Uninsured'
Jason Rosenbaum
McCain's Health Plan Only Works If You Don't Get Sick
Trudy Lieberman
Universal Health Coverage Is No Silver Bullet
Niko Karvounis
U.K. and Australia Fight Breast Cancer with Free Screening for Women 50+
Alice Alech
The Candidates Need More Than a Patchwork Approach to Health Care
Marie Cocco
"We don't like the FDA," chant 10,000 demonstrators in candlelight vigils, some dressed as cows.
"Mad cow, you eat it!"
"Send mad cow to the presidential office!"
A scene from the National Mall? San Francisco?
No, the nightly rallies are in Seoul and 22 other South Korean cities to protest ratification of the pending U.S.-South Korea free trade agreement, KORUS FTA.
The agreement, drafted a year ago but not yet signed, would boost two-way trade between the nations from $78 billion a year to $98 billion a year under the condition that South Korea lift almost all restrictions on U.S. beef, including the age of butchered cattle.
KORUS FTA is considered the most significant event in South Korea-U.S. relations since the 1953 military accord and was punctuated by a visit last month from newly elected South Korean President Lee Myung-bak to Camp David, where no South Korean president had been invited before. Lee is a pro-American conservative, unlike his predecessor Roh Moo-hyun, who was elected on an anti-American platform.
While the FTA delivers on Lee's pledge to double South Korea's wealth if elected and lets the United States rebuild its Asian beef trade obliterated by a mad cow scare five years ago, many in South Korea are saying, "You want us to import WHAT"?
Because South Korean cuisine "includes cow bones and intestines that are believed to have a higher concentration of prions," writes Cho Jin-seo in the Korea Times, South Koreans feel they are at greater risk for Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) if the beef is infected with mad cow disease.
They interpret the agreement's prohibition of "the use of the entire carcass of cattle not inspected and passed for human consumption, unless the cattle are less than 30 months of age, or the brains and spinal cords have been removed," to mean meat from cattle under 30 months old or stripped of the high-risk materials will be uninspected.
Gruesome TV programs featuring cows being slaughtered and a report by a professor of medicine at Hallym University on MBC that South Koreans are genetically more vulnerable to vCJD -- which other scientists refuted -- have fanned the flames. So have internet-based rumors that cosmetics, diapers, sanitary napkins and noodles contain cow tissue and are contaminated.
Until the discovery of mad cow disease in the United States in 2003, South Korea was the third-largest importer of U.S. beef, spending $850 million per year. It eased the ban in 2006 only to find backbones -- a banned substance -- lurking in the beef; it was banned again (see: Charlie Brown; football), and 5,300 tons were impounded. Now the meat, which has been in storage, is rumored to soon be released. Will it be billed as fresh?
Of course there are other dangerous meats in the South Korean diet. No hygiene regulations govern the millions of dogs slaughtered for food each year, says the Herald Sun, because they are not considered livestock.
But that doesn't mean worries about U.S. beef are unfounded.
See more stories tagged with: health, beef, food, food safety, u.s. beef, mad cow, korea
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »
EMAIL
PRINT
7 COMMENTS
