Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Do You Know When to Stop Eating?

By Irene Rubaum-Keller, Huffington Post. Posted May 18, 2008.


We all come with internal "full" meters. But many Americans have been conditioned to ignore theirs.
Advertisement

I asked my son, when he was about 6, how he knew when to stop eating. He said, "My tummy tells me, because, I can't actually see in there." I have raised him on as much healthy food as he will eat and let him have some sweets as well. I have allowed him to dictate when he is done with his meals and how much dessert he will have. He is 11 now and normal-weighted, and in touch with his sense of hunger and satiety.

I grew up during a time when adults told you to eat all your food if you wanted dessert. All your food was often what was put on your plate by an adult. Not only were we being taught to disregard our body's "full" meters, but also that the reward for overeating was more high-calorie, yummy food. Not the best message to grow up with.

Our tummies may have been telling us to stop, but our parents were telling us it was good to keep going. If you override your natural "full" meter often enough, it tends to go into a coma. It can take years of normal eating to revive it too. Not only does the "full" meter go to sleep, but you can get used to that overstuffed, almost drugged, feeling you get from overeating. It is amazing what the human body can get used to and then begin to crave.

If you have ever smoked cigarettes, you understand this concept. That first inhalation should have been enough to stop all of us from taking the second. It hurt, it made us cough, we felt light-headed, even nauseous. It was truly disgusting. How that disgusting first drag could turn into a two-pack-a-day habit is amazing to me.

When it comes to food and health, we know that we should eat only when we are hungry. Eat only until we are 80 percent full, not too full. Make sure our diets consist mainly of fresh fruits, vegetables, lean protein and whole grains. Get some exercise. The end.

If we could all do that, obesity would be a nonissue. We would all be at a healthy weight. We wouldn't all be skinny, as we do vary in our body types, but we certainly wouldn't be morbidly obese either. The problem for many of us is that we don't know when we are full until we are stuffed and/or we keep eating even though we know we are full. Couple that with the high-fat, high-calorie foods that many of us have become accustomed to eating, and the obesity problem we have today is no wonder.

So if you acknowledge that your full meter is broken, how do you know when to stop eating?

The answer to this question is that you don't. You need something outside yourself to help you with that, and that is where keeping food records and counting calories comes in. I know, you don't want to hear that, but it is the truth. Maybe one day there will be a pill, or magic, but until then, this is the best we've got. When you weigh 300 pounds and have gotten used to eating 3,000 calories a day, you will be hungry on 2,500 calories a day. Even though 2,500 calories is a binge day for most women, you will be hungry on that because of what you are used to. It is best to lower your calories slowly so as not to experience too big of a backlash.

Keeping food records and counting calories will also keep you awake to what you are putting in your mouth and how much. Many of us are asleep at the wheel when it comes to what and how much we are eating. If you want to change your weight, you have to pay attention.

So, once your "full" meter is broken, can it ever be repaired?

The good news is that, yes, it can, but it might take a very, very long time. I was heavy for years and lost a significant amount of weight 18 years ago and have kept it off since. After 16 years of maintaining my weight loss, I noticed that my "full" meter had been restored. I now know when I am 80 percent full and am happy to stop eating then because that means I get to eat more soon. If I do overeat now and get too full, I hate it. I can't stand the feeling and can't wait until it passes. This motivates me not to do it again. It's almost like if you don't smoke for years and years and then take a drag, it feels like the first drag all over again. (I don't recommend trying that, by the way.)

If you want to lose weight, repair your full meter, or just get more in touch with your hunger and satiety, and try writing down what you are eating for a week. You will be amazed at what you learn about yourself. During the weight loss phase, I recommend keeping food records the entire time you are losing and then for enough time following the weight loss to be able to maintain it without the records. It works!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: health, food, dieting, eating, overeating, feeling full, satiety

Irene Rubaum-Keller is a licensed psychotherapist who has been in private practice in the Los Angeles area for over 20 years.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
let's ignore all the other reasons for overeating
Posted by: e rice on May 18, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thhis is only one aspect of a problem with many causes.

many people eat for emotional reasons, some of them the result of childhood abuse, or because many poor people equate excess food with security and success.

some people have glandular problems that are never properly diagnosed and treated. some vitamin deficiencies also affect the amount of food eaten, what kind, and how it's metabolized.

but let's be simplistic and ascribe it all to being told by our parents to overeat and eat too many snacks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A thoughtful, well written article on the author's perspective
Posted by: JLPearson on May 19, 2008 8:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on the issues of healthy eating and healthy weight. I have emotional issues with foods. Food was offered as a reward when I was young and I still use it as a source of comfort today. Yes, I have learned it is not a healthy coping mechanism but as the author states, it is not easy to reprogram the body. As I feel more secure in myself, it does get easier. And there are physical reasons for over-eating, as well as emotional ones. I have read that the corn syrup used in many foods today does not register with our bodies the way sugar did, so we eat more before feeling full. And MSG acts in a similar way, blocking the normal signals that we are full, so we keep eating salty foods.
Eating less refined foods would help a great deal, as would learning that sometimes an inner emptiness is better served by being listened to, instead of being fed. When we do not feel fulfilled in our lives, we eat to feel full.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to eat less
Posted by: Logic's Edge on May 21, 2008 12:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your body will generate a signal that it doesn't need more food at the moment. The problem is that there is a delay between when you start eating and when the signal becomes sufficiently strong.

Decide how much to each beforehand and eat that. Then wait ten minutes before deciding to eat any more. Typically, people will find that once the ten minutes is up, they feel full enough not to want to continue eating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How to eat less Posted by: Jeffski
That's okay -- President Obama will tell us how much we can eat
Posted by: Blink on May 21, 2008 3:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...along with what kind of vehicles we can drive (not SUVs, of course) and at what temperature we can set our thermostats. It's but one of the various tenets of progressive religiosity that are to be forced on the unwashed masses of bitter clingers who reside in the 51-57 states in the middle of the country, somewhere near Souix City, Iowa...but not, of course, to Obama or his family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Go f#$% yourself . . . Posted by: Scientz
» Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Posted by: vincen13
» RE: Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Posted by: Blink
» RE: Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Posted by: wavydavy
insulin levels are your cut-off switch
Posted by: Anthhh on May 21, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our appetites are controled by sugar levels.

Eating a pound of cheese-pasta will leave your
body thinking that it is hungrier-for-more-
food than eating a half pound of a mixed
nutrient-rich variety.


Get it?

Variety in your meals.

It may not sit well with your digestive
section, but in the end it's the nutritional
value of your fuel that counts.

Would you purchase watered down gasoline for
your car, if your car were a Lamborghini?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it quacks like a weight-loss diet . . .
Posted by: hagwind on May 21, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got fat because I ate compulsively. I ate compulsively -- well, the reasons aren't simple, and I only began to understand them in retrospect, but for me compulsive, excessive eating was a sort of self-prescribed tranquilizer. I ate myself into lethargy. Sometimes the lethargy slipped toward depression. I didn't like feeling sluggish and sick, but I did like the payoff: if I felt sluggish and sick, I couldn't possibly even attempt to do the things I was afraid I couldn't do. Plus, since I was fat, hardly anyone expected me to accomplish anything anyway. Long story how I got out of that morass, but it didn't involve "dieting" or counting calories. It did involve a 12-step program (not Overeaters Anonymous, btw -- in my area at that time the OA meetings acted too much like diet clubs), and hanging out with people who didn't think being fat disqualified you from the human race. (My subconscious was convinced that it did.)

In this article Irene Rubaum-Keller starts off down the road toward acknowledging that our relationships with food have social causes, e.g., parental rules about eating everything on your plate, but then she falls into the familiar rut of offering the same old individual solution: counting calories and watching your weight until maybe in the sweet bye-and-bye you'll learn to recognize when you're full and be able to stop eating at that point. I guess I did it backwards: I learned to recognize when my eating was going out of control and to trace it back to its source (which usually had something to do with fear), and to deal with that. No way I could have done that in isolation. I had to do the work, of course, but I wouldn't have been able to muster the courage if I hadn't had people around who expected me to keep putting one foot in front of the other. I was lucky, too: I wasn't locked into any situations (like a lousy marriage or a soul-deadening job) that I couldn't get out of.

Weight-loss dieting may be a solution for some, but for many others I suspect it's part of the problem. Counting calories and "watching your weight" seem to be a way of life for so many people, women especially. It's a variation on mortification of the flesh, like hair shirts and scourges. It's based on the same assumption that the body will run amok if it's not continuously subjected to rigid controls -- which becomes a self-fulfilling expectation because so often bodies continuously subjected to rigid controls do run amok when those controls are relaxed. (I learned this in the days of sex-segregated college dorms: when "intervisitation" was allowed only once a semester, all sorts of wild carousing took place. When it was allowed 24/7 and when men and women actually lived on the same floor, life became positively dull.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» well put Posted by: e rice
» REAL women don't Diet Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: REAL women don't Diet Posted by: hagwind
» Soooo true.... Posted by: margwa
Still to this day I always eat everything on my plate
Posted by: blogbooks on May 21, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has to do with growing up poor and constantly being told to finish all my food.

Needless to say I have had on again off again weight problems since childhood. Only when I started controlling my own diet and learning about nutrition did I start to lose weight.

In obese America I think the worst thing you can do is force your children into the habit of always eating all of their food. This is especially bad in restaurants where the portions are HUGE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Me too
Posted by: leftymathprof on May 21, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My own experience was very much like what Rubaum-Keller described, except that my "full meter" came back sooner. I regained it after only about a year and a half of dieting. But I still have to be careful to pay attention to it -- a lifetime's bad habit can still come back easily.

I grew up with the dictum "always clean your plate." My brother, who grew up in the same household, somehow escaped that idea -- I don't know how -- when I visited him a couple of years ago and had a meal with him, when he stopped eating he said in a very ritualistic fashion, "you should always leave something on your plate." Of course, that's not quite the ideal answer either, but at least that makes you less likely to destroy your "full meter."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not the calories, it's much more complex
Posted by: war_on_tara on May 21, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you weigh 300 pounds and have gotten used to eating 3,000 calories a day, you will be hungry on 2,500 calories a day. Even though 2,500 calories is a binge day for most women, you will be hungry on that because of what you are used to.

Really? Does chewiness, texture, flavor have no bearing on it? Your "tummy" doesn't magically "know" how many calories are being put into it. Anyone eating 3,000 calories a day who is not a lumberjack is eating processed junk food, and is almost certainly not cooking for him/her-self.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

scare tactic on the way here...
Posted by: ellie on May 21, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go ahead, ignore the full meter in your brain and here's what you can look forward to when you begin to develop type 2 diabetes... think about allowing this to happen to your kids, just go ahead, tap dance on the land mine also known as your pancreas...

feeling like you have the flu all the time while barfing while your poor body tries to play catch up from all the glucose you put in your mouth...

your blood becomes sugary sweet to smell and looks like oil sludge, thick and almost red black...

multiple glucose lowering drugs that may or may not work...

several times a day sticking your fingers to draw blood for glucose checks and all the equipment you need to lug with you to do this... all for the low, low, price of almost a dollar a test strip... so... constant open wounds in your skin open to all kinds of stuff...

improve your math skills by learning to add up carbohydrates before something goes into your mouth, it's no longer YUM, it's 10+25+12=?

looking forward to your heart getting clogged with sticky, nasty, red blood cells that look like M&M's coated with sugar, soooo, they don't work unless the meds crack the sugar cell walls... believe it or not, when this happens, your body is starving for oxygen and fuel and can't get at it...

not to mention your pancreas wears out from working it's butt off for nothing and you get the great honor of injecting insulin 6-10 times a day, looking down the road to a new career as a kidney dialysis patient, hooked up to a mechanized and painful process of 4 hours a day, three times a week scrubbing other crud out of your blood, but guess what... you still get to keep your M&M coated red blood cells for the next 3 months...

death...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sound advice, but...
Posted by: ankhet on May 21, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...children have been bullied by their parents since the dawn of time to finish everything on their plates. So why is there this ballooning in obesity now?

Anyway, that's not the only way an "appestat" gets disrupted - another is long periods of not enough food. Look at anorexics - funny thing, they are extremely powerful, very in control; but at one point, their system breaks and the disease takes control. Lecturing them on how to eat sensibly only reinforces the cycle.

And if you can't tell when you're full, how the blinkety-blank can you tell when you're 80% full?

What about the pain when you're dieting? Who or what helps with that? I lost over 100 pounds - could not sleep, was in awful pain all the time, day and night, had restless legs like crazy - was considering ending it there and then.

Not a formula for success.

Well-intentioned, correct according to all the best current medical wisdom, (doctors don't know either)the article will just add to the grief.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the bigger we are the better
Posted by: JohnJlws on May 21, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I was more fortunate than most. My mom was a horrible cook. She started the “blackened” trend before it was trendy and didn’t bother with the exotic spices “blackened” chefs use. Add to that that my parents didn’t like each other and so meals turned into eating in hell; my relationship with food has always been a take it or leave it proposition.

At the same time, I’d kill for chocolate and maim for ice-cream and my repertoire of junk food would rival people three times my normal (BMI) size. My wife has done battle with weight her entire life. When she was young her doc told her to try controlling her carbohydrates (he said “eliminate anything white”). She did and controlled her weight, but suddenly she wasn’t “cleaning her plate,” or “eating her potatoes,” or “getting enough grain.” Feeling guilty she began eating the food of the food pyramid produced by the people who sell the food at the top of the pyramid (hogwash; thank McGovern as there is limited science, and mostly money, behind the Food Pyramid). Like most women she tried every diet known and then a while ago picked up a little Dell 10 cent book she had as a kid titled “The Carbohydrate Counter.” That led back to Atkins, to The Zone and to independent research on the body’s relationship with food. She knows more about food and our bodies than most nutritionists (seriously) and she wasn’t defined by “the science,” or any one discipline; she was defined by her results.

Isn’t it funny that when we’re losing weight, people will ask very concerned “are you sick,” or, “do you have cancer?” But, if we’re as big as a mountain without enough energy to tie our shoes we hear “you’re such a good eater.”

Name the last time anyone came up and said “gosh you look like a walking stroke!” My wife controls her carbs, eats lots of vegetables (like zucchini, asparagus, etc.), snacks on lots of nuts and limits her intake of anything that can drive up insulin (the thing in our body that tells the body “store fat”). She’s at her optimum weight and has been for years, looks 15 years younger and has more energy than anyone around. And it’s not easy, but it’s doable. Whenever I want to drop a few pounds I simply stop eating most carbs.

I agree in this regard with the author: We definitely do have a full meter. I disagree with some of what the author says because the problem many people face and do not realize is their full meter has been overwhelmed by an environment just bursting with unnecessary carbohydrates (ask any doctor or nutritionist to list the “required,” carbohydrates, those necessary for the body to function [there are necessary fats and proteins, but the list of necessary carbohydrates is empty as there are none]). I also disagree with “counting calories” as though an empty calorie of soda is somehow equivalent to the calories in a cashew or fish or steak—a calorie is not a calorie. And I disagree with the thought process that “we have to go slow in reducing calories” or the body will tell us “I’m hungry.” If the body is saying “this is painful,” or the body is saying “I’m hungry,” the body is telling us something. Not listening to the body when it’s saying “I’m hungry” is no different than not listening when it’s saying “I’m full.” It’s the opposite end of the same spectrum. The key is eating the right foods and gosh I just love them, but carbohydrate laden foods aren’t it. For my wife and I this has been the key. Others have different opinions, which is of course fine, but I would simply recommend reading the science and not listening to people embracing the grain and dairy industry and their food pyramid. Then decide. One way or another we, our nation, better figure out this obesity thing and not oversimplify it with “let’s all turn on our full meters.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent comment. Posted by: wheresarah
» RE: xcellent comment. Posted by: JohnJlws
» RE: xcellent comment. Posted by: wheresarah
Eating Guidelines
Posted by: vincen13 on May 21, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With 22 years experience as an eating disorder therapist I applaud this article. We teach this method of eating to compulsive eaters.

The message is limits. Reacquaint yourself with your body's natural limiits.

To the other comments on this board, there are many reasons we have learned to ignore this natural limit, but none of them are more compelling than our own health and well-being.

Excellent article!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» No Kidding Posted by: JohnJlws
Mentality of Paucity (vs. Abundance) and Finding Other Pleasures
Posted by: drricklippin on May 21, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until people can overcome the underlying core belief of possibly not having enough food(based in the past on reality!)they will eat beyond what is required.

Also poeple must have other pleasures besides food which is indeed one of life's truly great pleasures but certainly not the only one

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Really Like How the Author Ties Over-eating to Smoking Cigarettes
Posted by: femmyv on May 21, 2008 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just in case anyone there still any lingering doubt that overweight people would be the focus of the next wave of social engineering hysteria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big, bigger, biggest
Posted by: pinkfloydd on May 21, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot believe people are again making excuses as to why they just have to over eat. You don't. Take control of your life by cooking your own food, at least two of the the three meals you eat. No matter what circumstance got you to the point of obesity, don't win the race to total bigness! Cook a meal (frying not allowed) that one person can eat and get full, and then remember those portions. You don't have to count calories or anything like that. Just be reasonable about wtf you eat. Very simple. Break the fast-food chain. Spend a little time and cook!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How do you know when to stop eating?
Posted by: ankhet on May 21, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the refrigerator's empty.

(my husband's answer - I thought it was hilarious)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America
Posted by: SOWILO on May 21, 2008 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lacks cultural dining habits and manners, such as how to hold your forks, spoons, etc. We don't eat slow, we eat fried food, we eat to excess.

If you eat with your back straight with good posture and eat SLOWLY, chewing your food, you will notice that you get full faster and you get more enjoyment out of your food.

Most Americans are provincial, culture-less trough eaters.

SOOOOEEEEEYYYYYY!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A major reason people over-eat is...
Posted by: rafaeltoral on May 21, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the food that they choose to eat. I have a very lean body type and for years this allowed me to eat whatever I wanted with only mild weight gain. I mostly ate fast food and the like. I was always hungry and felt like shit most of the time.

I then slowly started to switch to whole foods. The results were amazing. These days all of the food I eat is good whole food. I am no longer constantly hungry. I look, feel and think far better than I ever thought I could. I am so active that I have a very hard time keeping weight on.

The real issue is these foods that we are addicted too are hollow. All calories and very few vitamins and minerals. They lack the good stuff we need to survive so our body compensates by eating far too much.

You truly are what you eat.
This world is filled with deception to keep you ignorant and confused and ultimately a slave to a broken system thats serves the selfish interests of a small majority of the population.

Just one mans opinion's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help with Nutritional Tracking
Posted by: ynotu on May 21, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been using this great website for about two months. It tracks nutrition, exercise, has great information and lots of support from other members. Best of all it's free.
Check it out.

www.sparkpeople.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simplistic!!!
Posted by: Gravitas on May 22, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Par for the course for the Huffington who printed an article that fat people have no right to protest their treatment.

*Obesity never was and never will be just about food. In fact, here is a new study from Canada that found very little relationship between "lifestyle" and weight among teens. Since it wasn't funded by Pharma, it won't be spammed all over the headlines.
www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-04/mu-pah043008.php

*Food journals have been tried for decades and have failed. They can also be triggers for eating disorders. As well as make people obsessed with food and boring to be around! (That is all they talk about!) Besides, who wants to spend all their time tracking what they eat!!! Life is too short for that.

I think the Huffington Post is incapable of being introspective about its fatphobia. They don't want to deal with their prejudices any more than the Right wants to give up theirs, so they need to justify to themselves fat people are doing something wrong. They have also bought into the idea thinlyness is next to Godliness so they will only look at factors that are within their own control and ignore everything else. I call that denial!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inside-Out
Posted by: oobi on May 22, 2008 10:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we suffer from inside-out:

video displays to replace our mind's eye
pharmaceuticals to replace what we normally produce ourselves
materialism to replace inner validation
physical travel to replace inner journeys
religion to replace our inner light
("I am who am" "I am the church")
advice, opinion self-helf gurus to replace internal dialogue

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]