Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

The Pentagon Is America's Biggest Polluter

By Joshua Frank, AlterNet. Posted May 12, 2008.


The U.S. has a grossly corrupted health protection system.
Advertisement

The nation's biggest polluter isn't a corporation. It's the Pentagon. Every year the Department of Defense churns out more than 750,000 tons of hazardous waste -- more than the top three chemical companies combined.

Yet the military remains largely exempt from compliance with most federal and state environmental laws, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Pentagon's partner in crime, is working hard to keep it that way.

For the past five decades the federal government, defense contractors and the chemical industry have joined forces to block public health protections against perchlorate, a component of rocket fuel that has been shown to effect children's growth and mental progress by disrupting the function of the thyroid gland which regulates brain development.

Perchlorate has been leaking from literally hundreds of defense plants and military installations across the country. The EPA has reported that perchlorate is present in drinking and groundwater supplies in 35 states. Center for Disease Control and independent studies have also overwhelmingly shown that perchlorate is existent in our food supplies, cow's milk, and human breast milk. As a result virtually every American has some level of perchlorate in their body.

Currently only two states, California and Massachusetts, have set a maximum allowable contaminant level for perchlorate in drinking water. But the EPA won't follow these states' lead. In the Colorado River, which provides water for over 20 million people, perchlorate levels are high. The chemical is most prevalent in the Southwest and California as a result of the large number of military operations and defense contractors in the region.

In 2001 the EPA estimated that the total liability for the cleanup of toxic military sites would exceed $350 billion, or five times the Superfund Act liability of private industry. But the federal government has been complacent and allowed perchlorate to run rampant throughout our water supplies. This negligence and lack of regulatory oversight has left the Pentagon, NASA and defense contractors free to set their own levels, trimming the high, but necessary costs of restoring groundwater quality.

While the situation has become dire in recent years, it was the Clinton administration that didn't do nearly enough to begin cleaning up these sites and certainly did not keep a close eye on how the Pentagon spent the money it received. During the 1990s the Defense Department spent only $3.5 billion a year cleaning up toxic military sites -- much of that on studies, not actual work. In 1998, the Defense Science Review Board, a federal advisory committee set up to provide independent advice to the secretary of defense, looked at the problem and concluded that the Pentagon had no clear environmental cleanup policy, goals or program, which led lawyer Jonathan Turley, who holds the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at George Washington University, to call the Pentagon the nation's "premier environmental villain."

"If they can spend $1 million on a cruise missile, it seems kind of ridiculous they won't spend $200,000 to see if our food is contaminated with rocket fuel," says Renee Sharp, a scientist with Environmental Working Group. But if the Clinton program was chintzy, the Bush plan has been downright penurious.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: perchlorate, pentagon, public health, drinking water

Joshua Frank is the author of Left Out! How Liberals Helped Reelect George W. Bush and edits http://www.BrickBurner.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There's also something called mental pollution. . .
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 16, 2008 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doctrine For Joint Psychological Operations, July 1996

"The Department of the Defense (DOD), including the
Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
or his designee, the DOD General Counsel, and the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are responsible for establishing
national objectives, developing policies, and approving
strategic plans for PSYOP. Geographic combatant
commanders and subordinate joint force commanders are
responsible for designating specific staff responsibilities,
ensuring that plans and programs are coordinated and
sufficiently represented, and that PSYOP are monitored and
reviewed. The Commander in Chief, US Special Operations
Command ensures that all PSYOP and support requirements
are addressed. The Military Departments and Services
provide civilian and military personnel with appropriate
training and planning skills."


There are the following categories...

Strategic PSYOP - International information activities conducted by US Government agencies to influence foreign attitudes, perceptions, and behavior in favor or US goals and objectives. These programs are conducted predominantly outside the military arena but can utilize Department of Defense assets and be suppor ted by military PSYOP. Military PSYOP with potential strategic impact must be coordinated with national efforts.

However, the fact of the matter is that the corporate public relations world is far bigger than the Pentagon PR world, though the two do overlap. Similarly, the biggest polluter on the planet is actually the fossil fuel industry and it's allies in industrial agribusiness, but notice that this also overlaps with the Pentagon, especially in the area of "goals and objectives".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]