Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

The Diarrhea Diet

By Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet. Posted April 15, 2008.


In lieu of exercise or a healthy diet, Americans now have the option of losing weight with a drug that causes bowel incontinence.
Advertisement

Since GlaxoSmithKline's (GSK) high profile launch of alli last summer, the first FDA-approved diet drug sold over the counter, the only figures that have flattened are sales.

Two million starter packages sold in the first few weeks at $49.99 for 60 pills and $69.99 for 120, thanks to a $150 million populist rollout that included displays in Targets, Wal-Marts and warehouse clubs.

But in 2008 that revenue growth "will be down a notch," Jean-Pierre Garnier, GSK's outgoing CEO, cautioned financial analysts, "because you won't have as much growth coming out of alli, although we have some."

Of course all diet products generate dropouts who don't like the results they're getting or the dietary restrictions.

And GSK admits alli results are slow and close to placebo.

But not all diet products feature the "oily bowels" and "anal leakage" that made alli an instant success on the comic circuit.

Because the active ingredient in alli, Orlistat, blocks the body's absorption of fat and ushers it out the bowels, sometimes before a person is ready or warned, GSK originally cautioned users to bring backup underwear with them or wear dark colors.

Users could even exchange "accident support group" tips on alli's online message board.

"You lost a couple of pounds, and you're on a date with that special girl," riffed Jay Leno, and then find yourself saying, "Excuse me while I change my pants."

"With Allies Like This, Who Needs Enemas?" asked Prescription Access Litigation.

"Maybe it should come with a coupon for Depends," quipped Philadelphia-area pharmacist Maria Taylor.

"The Diarrhea Diet" and "Sh-t Yourself Thin" spoofed bloggers.

GSK said the dreaded "treatment effects" which occur when users exceed 15 grams of fat a day -- a fast-food hamburger has 30 -- could teach people to avoid fatty foods through aversion therapy, like Antabuse does with alcohol. (One specialist even suggested users shouldn't get so upset about a little bowel incontinence.)

But critics said if eating right is doing the heavy lifting, why do you need alli to begin with?

And Dr. Sidney M. Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's Heath Research Group, observed that "alli doesn't block carbohydrates," which for many overweight people is the real problem.

Even though Orlistat has been available as the prescription drug Xenical, manufactured by Roche since 1998, not everyone thinks it's safe.

Roche's own study raises questions about precancerous colon polyps, says Public Citizen. And questions about a higher incidence of breast cancer in early clinical trials actually delayed FDA review of the drug.

Nor has Orlistat been successful -- falling in sales from $135 million in 2002 to just $93 million in 2007, which some say led to GSK's last ditch recasting of it as an over-the-counter medication.

Of course it's no secret that GSK is hurting.

Since the New England Journal of Medicine outed its top-selling diabetes drug, Avandia, in 2007 for raising the risk of heart attack by 43 percent, and the FDA subsequently mandated a black box warning, the drug giant has lost $1 billion -- not to mention its reputation and Wall Street luster.

"When you lose the most profitable of your line, it has a disproportionate effect on the cost of goods and the gross margin," conceded Garnier to reporters reviewing last year's bleak performance.

GSK no doubt thought it could churn alli -- maybe the lower case "a" was to disassociate it with Avandia -- like a bad movie or IPO. After all, even Merck's Vioxx made money after the lawsuits were paid.

But you can't blame GSK for the public's willingness to accept anal leakage and an eating disorder as the price of being thin.

"Don't we consider people that are using drugs to induce diarrhea as suffering from bulimia, and in need of medical and psychological help?" asks a blogger writing about alli. "Maybe someone should consider repackaging Ipecac into pill form and marketing it as the newest diet plan."

Especially because the traditional American tool kit of consumerism, impatience, and control doesn't work with obesity -- as failed fat surgeries and liposuctions testify.

And you can't treat overeating with a different kind of overeating.

In 1998, Frito Lay introduced a brand new potato chip made with a fat that was chemically processed to make it indigestible.

WOW potato chips boasted that they had no fat calories because the recently approved sucrose polyester, Olestra, passed right out of the body. Quickly.

But two years after its introduction, Wow's sales tanked. Not only did it not make people thin, they didn't like its "treatment effects." It wasn't the kind of "wow" they were looking for.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: fda, drugs, diet, alli

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
With Allies like this, Who needs Enemas Award
Posted by: prescriptionaccess on Apr 15, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our group, Prescription Access Litigation, is mentioned in the article. Last year, we gave one of our Bitter Pill Awards to GlaxoSmithKline for its launch of alli.

The award was the ‘With Allies Like This, Who Needs Enemas?’Award for Irresponsibly Selling a Formerly Prescription-Only Weight Loss Drug Over-the-Counter.

Even if sales of alli are falling, GlaxoSmithKline managed to turn a profit on a drug that was barely effective, potentially dangerous and definitely disgusting. Thus continues the success of Big Pharma's model of offering drugs that do little to solve real problems but reinforce our cultural tendency to seek a pill for every ill. alli is a perfect example of how the pharmaceutical industry encourages us to try to solve societal and economic problems with pharmaceutical "solutions."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put simply ...
Posted by: realmuzik on Apr 16, 2008 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... this has got to be the WORST "diet aid," ever. And it's no surprise that it got by the FDA, given their track record. Sheesh ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Debateable. Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Put simply ... Posted by: Prairie Waif
Weakness of spirit
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 16, 2008 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Marines, they say pain is just weakness leaving the body. Too many people have been wrapped in cotton wool and told life is to be pain-free. But keeping fit involves healthy pain (the pain of sore muscles, sore lungs).

But you should learn to love the pain because with that pain comes something better: the high of health. That's something Marines know as well. Guys who are fit are also flying high on positive energy and can do pretty well anything.

It is not hard to eat well and exercise. But you first need to let the weakness leave your body through some short-term pain. After that, you will be very happy. Try it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Positive energy? Posted by: kepstein7777
» Obesity by Zip Code Posted by: Prairie Waif
» Weakness of intellect Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Weakness of spirit Posted by: Lagstorm
» RE: Weakness of spirit Posted by: Prairie Waif
Eeewwwww!
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 16, 2008 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll stick with a balanced diet of real food and exercise. No weird pills. No fat-free mutant foods with trendy names and ingredients.

Knowing my luck, the real food will probably be what kills me. But at least I'll be dying of natural causes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eewwwww! Posted by: lepidopteryx
» The Gods of Irony Posted by: Maxwell House
» The Gods of Irony Posted by: Maxwell House
What? A great diet!
Posted by: Hovey on Apr 16, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh you have got to be kidding me, this is a great "alli". The weight is just spurting out....I mean falling off. I love it and let me tell you why. I like it because when...oh..gotaa go bye.[The writer hurries off to the bathroom]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What? A great diet! Posted by: pandahead
That marketing meeting must have been interesting..
Posted by: cyr3n on Apr 16, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd have loved to be a fly on the wall during the marketing meeting for "alli". Seriously, crapping your pants as a side effect if you eat one too many burgers is -really- bad! .. its like something out of a poorly fabricated fairy-tale. If people are willing to go through that for weightloss, surely there's a market for a pill that will make you lose weight and shrink your testicles. Oh... right.. steroids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moderation
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 16, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is just no substitute for moderation. Moderation in eating, moderation in spending, moderation in religion, moderation in policies, - the list goes on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Moderation Posted by: fomented
» Or moderation in preaching Posted by: Gravitas
OR wear dark colors???!!!
Posted by: fomented on Apr 16, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's OK to sh-t yourself as long as you have on a dark color?!

Where were those people raised? Scatsville?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OR wear dark colors???!!! Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: OR wear dark colors???!!! Posted by: Cooltruth
for reals:
Posted by: madaha on Apr 16, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
does anyone actually know anyone else who is taking this stuff?

*boggle*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I need to lose at least 15 pounds
Posted by: bettyn on Apr 16, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but not THAT way! This sounds extremely dangerous. Might as well go the anorexia/bulimia route.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why allow HFCS in so many foods?
Posted by: Cooltruth on Apr 16, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You will have a hard time finding condiments, jams, fruit drinks, soft drinks or a variety of processed foods that don't contain this fat producing ingredient. Then they allow alli to be marketed to people whom they have convinced that being fat was 'unhealthy' for them? Spare me any 'mandatory' healthcare insurance that these bozos would have anything to do with!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sick Society
Posted by: wireup on Apr 16, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no more words, I am so disgusted.

What a sick culture we are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can we advance the discussion beyond 7th grade snickering?
Posted by: ianrey on Apr 16, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I took it for a while, and what I found (and my doctor confirmed) was that it's not meant to be a fat-burner, but a behavior modifier. If you take it, a fatty meal or dessert will cause discomfort, and other side effects, but the pill won't prevent you from metabolising all the calories or fat grams from whatever you consume (some, maybe). Instead, it can provide negative reinforcement against the unhealthy food, and encourage you to eat low fat, high-fiber foods, a diet which will keep the negative side effects away. It's a more immediate negative effect than the weight gain would be, and forces you to consciously think about what you eat. Not a bad thing; it worked pretty well for me, and once I really learned to watch out for the foods that would hit the hardest, it wasn't necessary to continue on the medication.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Consumer Bonus
Posted by: Artkansas on Apr 16, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's surprising that they don't wrap this in a package with Depends. It's natural marketing synergy. One product requires that we buy two. ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow, I get all that and more!
Posted by: carcinoid112 on Apr 16, 2008 11:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And all I had to do was get a rare cancer that does the same thing for you!! (Google my screen name.)

Lucky me, I can stop the worst of the side effects with only $10,000-15,000 a month in medicines.

What morons let this go through at the FDA?? Oh, yeah, The Bushisa morons that saw a way for somebody to make a buck...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Free Samples
Posted by: mberg on Apr 16, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if GSK has been giving free samples to the Bush Administration as they are truly the shitty-est in history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Free Samples Posted by: babs
Haw, Haw, this issue is funny.
Posted by: Deborah on Apr 16, 2008 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the coming Depression and its companion that has been already felt through war, Peak Oil, the majority of the American people are going to be on “diets” forced upon them whether they are "fat" or not, just like the poor in this country have been for years (and it hasn't made them thin either, but they will get the chance to work off that starvation fat too or just eat dirt like the poor do now in Haiti and the bark off of trees like they did in North Korea). The shortage of food and drinkable water is now being felt hard throughout the rest of the world NOW.

Americans will find out just how thin everyone who is in debt up to their ears now will become when we all lose our jobs, can’t pay property taxes, lose the roofs over our heads, and can’t buy food are transferred to government camps and forced to work in Corporation farms harvesting and eating their genetically modified crops - that is now killing the bee population off - in order to pay the debts off as well as to survive the coming storages of food and water courtesy of global warming and the ruling elites’ well laid plans.

This issue then either becomes totally irrelevant or ironically forecasts the desperate plight (s**t) all American citizens will find themselves in in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As Long As The Women Are Preened Over By Their ?Man? 89 lbs., Great if..
Posted by: Turiye on Apr 16, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..you are a 10 year old boy. Says much for many American men, and the American women think a flat ass and no breasts are tres chic, raise their beauty level, Indeed!
No, No health involved in this s..I won't, I will not, I refuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Metformin is a cheaper way to lose weight by diarrhea
Posted by: logansafi on Apr 16, 2008 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Number One oral anti-diabetic med, Metformin, causes the shits, too, and defintitely keeps the appetite down. And then there is always guiardia, a disease that is guaranteed to help you lose weight. It's free even. Just drink some contaminated water, and you will have crampy shits more than enough to lose 40-50 lbs quite quick! Hey!... the sky is the limit here!

And why not try Norvo Virus, too? Short acting but definitely good for weight control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sheeple will be Sheeple
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 16, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad part is how weight obsessed we are in the first place. This is not about health. Anyone who can read can find studies finding that health comes in all shapes and sizes. Besides, every single diet drug on the market has caused harm in some part of the population that has used it. No problem. Pharma does the scares studies so just blame side effects on obesity. It sells more pills that way.

I also resent the judgmental line about in leu of diet and exercise. Diet and exercise does not make every thin because we are supposed to come in different shapes and sizes. Besides, as overworked and overwhelmed with keeping a roof over their heads as most Americans are, who can blame them for not wanting to go hungry and have the 3rd or 4th job of fighting their bodies.

One benefit of the economy going down the tubes. Finally, Americans will have something to obsess over besides their waistlines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Diapers for young and old
Posted by: wisegalah on Apr 18, 2008 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is not American technology amazing? Truly amazing.
Small children need to wear diapers because they do not have the neurological control over the bottom end of their gastrointestinal tract.
With the astonishing advances of technology, american adults now need to wear diapers because they are too immature to control the upper ends of their gastrointestinal tracts.

Amazing, amazing, amazing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Weight stigma
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Apr 18, 2008 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the enormous stigma attached to being "fat" in this culture, I don't wonder that people would rather be incontinent than overweight. Never mind that stigmatizing and reviling the overweight doesn't help, it seems to be some kind of sick, pointlessly cruel national sport.

I am truly curious to see a well-crafted study of what kinds of things people would exchange for a "normal" body -- not just things like incontinence (which doesn't surprise me at all) but things like IQ points, or, like the Anderson's Little Mermaid, chronic, extreme pain, or the loss of voice. How many people would rather be blind than fat? Let's quantify the reality of the pain that weight stigma causes in terms that people might understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]