Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

World Health Day: The Hazards of Global Warming to Your Health

By Susan Blumenthal and Yi-An Ko and Stephanie Safdi and Beth Hoffman and Julie Chen, Huffington Post. Posted April 7, 2008.


The health of our planet and its people are inextricably entwined.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As thousands of people pour into emergency rooms and millions line up to be vaccinated, Brazil's public health officials and recently even its military are fighting to control vector-borne diseases. Mosquitoes are carrying illnesses like dengue and yellow fever into Brazil's largest cities, including Rio and Brasília, and the tropical disease, chikungunya, previously unheard of in Italy, was reported there last year. The two recent outbreaks in Brazil have caused a total of more than 80 deaths, 57,000 new infections, and widespread panic. As a result of global warming, mosquitoes, ticks, rodents and other vectors are expanding their geographic range and altering long-established patterns of disease. Climate changes worldwide are also causing serious problems with food and water supplies, increasing mental health concerns, and exacerbating air pollution, which elevates chronic disease risk.

Global temperature increases of 0.9°F (0.5°C) over the past century have led to an estimated 150,000 deaths and the loss of 5.5 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) annually, with the rates expected to double over the next several decades. The World Health Organization (WHO) has documented 39 new or re-emerging diseases since the 1960's, many linked to global warming -- an explosion of illnesses that has not been seen since the Industrial Revolution when masses of people moved to cities, increasing the spread of disease. Nevertheless, only minimal attention has been paid to one of the most significant yet least publicized hazards of climate change -- its impact on the health of people worldwide. Human health, influenced by a complex system of biological, social, economic, political and geographic factors, is particularly vulnerable to the effects of global warming and has significant humanitarian, economic and national security implications. On World Health Day, it is time to focus international attention on this critical issue.

Many infectious diseases exhibit sensitivity to climate change. Mosquitoes -- the most common disease vectors that spread illnesses such as malaria, dengue, West Nile encephalitis, and yellow fever -- thrive in wet and humid tropical environments. Currently, at least one million people die every year, including 3000 children every day, from malaria. A 3.6-5.4°F increase in global temperatures would cause malaria-carrying mosquitoes to enter new geographic areas, placing millions more people at risk of the disease. Moreover, this is not just a problem for the developing world. Malaria and dengue fever cases have been reported in the United States. West Nile encephalitis outbreaks, linked to warmer temperatures, have been on the rise in America as well. Studies also suggest that the extreme storms of El Niño increased mosquito populations, contributing to a five-fold rise in malaria rates worldwide. As global climate change produces more extreme weather events, such as hurricanes and flooding, spikes in the prevalence of other weather sensitive diseases can be expected. Furthermore, deforestation, a major contributor to global warming, has brought animals and ticks in contact with humans, resulting in the emergence of a new infectious illness, Lyme's Disease, first reported in 1975. Global warming is projected to expand the range of ticks that carry this disease.

The earth's water supply has also been profoundly affected by global warming, endangering the health of people and the planet. Water is essential to all aspects of life, yet 99% of water on Earth is unsafe or unavailable to drink. As a result of global warming, water will become even more scarce and contaminated as climate patterns change, extreme weather events occur, and glaciers melt. The 20th century has witnessed the greatest increase in temperature of any century in the past thousand years, bringing with it a change in precipitation patterns and a rise in sea levels. Global sea levels rose at an average rate of 0.07 inches per year from 1961-2003 (rising at an even greater rate of 0.12 inches per year on average from 1993-2003) reducing fresh water availability and elevating water temperatures that threaten already scarce water supplies. The 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report projected that the global mean sea level is expected to rise between 7.1 to 23.2 inches by 2100. In many places, a rise in 19.7 inches would cause some beaches to be washed away, and for some islands such as the Maldives, it could mean significant portions of the land being submersed underwater. Furthermore, the combination of extreme weather events and changes in the availability of water affect agricultural food production, destroy botanical sources of natural medicines, incapacitate sewage systems, and result in widespread population displacement, leading to disruptions in acute and chronic disease management with national security implications as well. Some of the world's major conflicts have arisen over disputes concerning arable land and water and these types of tensions may become even more prevalent as resources diminish.

Changes to the earth's water supply have threatened populations around the globe with new diseases and sanitation concerns. 1.1 billion people worldwide lack safe drinking water and 2.6 billion people do not have access to adequate sanitation infrastructure. In the United States alone, more than 750,000 cases of diseases associated with unsafe drinking water occurred between 1980 and 1996. Moreover, changes in the quality and distribution of water in the aftermath of extreme weather events are linked to increased malnutrition and food poisoning, increased rates of child and infant mortality, and elevated morbidity and deaths from diarrheal diseases. Flooding, in particular, causes upsurges in rodent-borne illnesses, such as leptospirosis, tularemia, plague, viral hemorrhagic diseases and cholera. The impact on human health continues long after the waters recede - with toxic contamination of food and water and mental health problems, such as post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Not surprisingly, developing nations bear the overwhelming burden of the health damaging effects of climate change. Of the 600,000 casualties caused by weather-related natural disasters in the 1990s, 95% occurred in the developing world. As a result of flooding in 2007 alone, 30,000 people lost their lives in Venezuela, and in China, 105 million people required immediate basic survival needs such as food, water, shelter, sanitation and medical assistance.

Scientific evidence also suggests that the noticeably hot summers of recent years may not be a coincidence. Climate change generates extremely hot weather, which threatens large population groups across the world with heat stroke and cardiac and respiratory complications. The 2003 European summer heat waves, during which temperatures reached 95° to 104°F, were associated with 35,000 deaths in a two month period. As the average global temperature rises, such heat waves can be expected to increase in severity and frequency.

Along with changes to water supplies and temperature patterns, global warming has dramatically affected the quality and safety of the very air we breathe. Air pollution is linked to 2 million deaths worldwide. Global warming enhances smog formation, which contributes to an increased risk for chronic diseases including lung cancer, heart disease, asthma and allergies (the rates of which have increased fourfold in the U.S. alone since 1980). Recent studies have found that carbon dioxide stimulates the production of pollen and of the spores of some fungi found in the soil. These allergens are carried into the lungs of humans by diesel particles found in urban areas, contributing to an increased risk for acute and chronic disease. These illnesses are further exacerbated by ground level ozone formation emanating from traffic emissions, increases in particulate matter, pollen and mold, and exposure to greenhouse gases like nitrous oxide. A study extrapolating the effects of air pollution suggests that a 1.8°F rise in temperature could increase global deaths by another 21,600 per year. Recent conditions in Beijing offer a worrisome example of the effects of air pollution on human health. In this city of over 17 million people, 2007 smog levels exceeded safety guidelines set by the World Health Organization by 400%, leaving citizens with only 65 days of acceptable breathing air and prompting public health officials to close highways and restrict air travel. These environmental problems have raised concerns by some people about the health of athletes competing in the 2008 Summer Olympics.

The profound effects of climate change demonstrate that the health of our planet and its people are inextricably entwined and underscore why action is needed now on multiple fronts to safeguard the health of people worldwide. The fight to stop global warming and reduce its health damaging effects begins with building a cleaner energy future and a more climate-conscious population. Greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced and natural resources protected through increased use of clean, efficient energy sources, developing new clean energy technologies, and encouraging individuals to make more environmentally conscious lifestyle decisions. Public health infrastructure and planning must be strengthened by advancing climate modeling and satellite monitoring, improving environmental public health tracking and disease surveillance, and increasing research into the relationship between climate change and health. Additionally, increasing health professional training and public education, developing government and private sector response plans, and building communication networks will enhance society's capacity to respond. To prevent and reduce the serious public health threats from global warming, nations in both the developed and developing world must share knowledge and best practices. A global coalition of governments, NGO's, businesses, schools, philanthropists, and individuals must collaborate across communities and countries to develop and implement lifesaving programs and innovative policies to ensure a greener and healthier world.

*Rear Admiral Susan Blumenthal, M.D. (ret.) is the Distinguished Advisor for Health and Medicine at the Center for the Study of the Presidency in Washington, D.C. and a Clinical Professor at Georgetown and Tufts University Schools of Medicine. For more than twenty years, she served in health leadership positions in the Federal government, including as Assistant Surgeon General of the United States and as the first Deputy Assistant Secretary of Women's Health in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and as Chief of the Behavioral Medicine and Basic Prevention Research Branch at the National Institutes of Health. She was also a White House Advisor on health issues. Dr. Blumenthal has received numerous awards including honorary doctorates for her important contributions to improving health in the United States and globally.

Yi-An Ko, a recent graduate of Harvard University, is a health policy fellow at the Center for the Study of the Presidency in Washington D.C.

Stephanie Safdi, M.Phil, is a research assistant at the Center for the Study of the Presidency in Washington D.C. She graduated summa cum laude from Harvard University and earned her Masters Degree from Cambridge University on a Harvard-Cambridge Scholarship. Ms. Safdi served as a research fellow at the Harvard Initiative for Global Health and is the recent recipient of a Fulbright Fellowship.

Beth Hoffman, an honors graduate of Brown University, is a health policy fellow at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and will be a first year medical student at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in the Fall.

Julie Chen, a senior at the University of California-Berkeley, is an intern at the Center for the Study of the Presidency in Washington D.C.

For a comprehensive scientific overview of the effects of global warming, see the Intergovernmental Reports on Climate Change (IPCC), available here.

This article is adapted from a commentary piece published in the Washington Times on April 6, 2008.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, environment, environmentalism, water, global warming, public health, global temperature, gobal warming health, greenhouse gases, infectious diseases, mosquitoes, world health day

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you, but the article grossly understates the case.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Apr 7, 2008 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See Scientific American, November 26, 2007
http://www.sciam.com/
article.cfm?id=state-of-
the-science-beyond-the-
worst-climate-change-case
State of the Science: Beyond the Worst Case Climate Change
Scenario
Human caused global warming started in the year 1750. The total
so far is 1.3 degrees Farenheit.

I will not buy land within 400 feet of sea level because I think sea
level could rise that far. When is unclear.

As I have posted before, global warming effects include the
collapse of agriculture and therefore civilization and possibly the
extinction of Homo Sapiens when the oceans make H2S, a poison
gas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Source articles on H2S from the hot ocean
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Apr 7, 2008 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hydrogen Sulfide gas will Kill all people. Homo Sap will go
EXTINCT unless drastic action is taken.

October 2006 Scientific American

"EARTH SCIENCE
Impact from the Deep
Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not
asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions.
Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions build once again?
By Peter D. Ward
downloaded from:
http://www.sciam.com/
article.cfm?articleID=
00037A5D-A938-150E-
A93883414B7F0000&
sc=I100322
....................Most of the article omitted......................
But with atmospheric carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm
and expected to accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900
ppm by the end of the next century, and conditions that bring
about the beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place. How soon
after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction? That is
something our society should never find out."

Press Release
Pennsylvania State University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, Nov. 3, 2003
downloaded from:
http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/prPennStateKump.htm
"In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and
the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper
levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide
catastrophically. This would kill most of the oceanic plants and
animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would
kill most terrestrial life."

www.astrobio.net is a NASA web zine. See:

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&
file=article&sid=672

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/modules.php?op=
modload&name=News&
file=article&sid=1535

http://www.astrobio.net/
news/article2509.html

http://astrobio.net/news/
modules.php?op=modload
&name=News&file=article
&sid=2429&mode=thread
&order=0&thold=0

These articles agree with the first 2. They all say 6 degrees C or
1000 parts per million CO2 is the extinction point.

The global warming is already 1.3 degree Farenheit. 11 degrees
Farenheit is about 6 degrees Celsius. The book "Six Degrees" by
Mark Lynas agrees. If the global warming is 6 degrees
centigrade, we humans go extinct. See:
http://www.marklynas.org/
2007/4/23/six-steps-to-hell-
summary-of-six-degrees-as-
published-in-the-guardian

"Under a Green Sky" by Peter D. Ward, Ph.D., 2007.
Paleontologist discusses mass extinctions of the past and the one
we are doing to ourselves.

ALL COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS MUST BE
CONVERTED TO NUCLEAR IMMEDIATELY TO AVOID
THE EXTINCTION OF US HUMANS. 32 countries have
nuclear power plants. Only 9 have the bomb. The top 3
producers of CO2 all have nuclear power plants, coal fired power
plants and nuclear bombs. They are the USA, China and India.
Reducing CO2 production by 90% by 2050 requires drastic action
in the USA, China and India. King Coal has to be demoted to a
commoner. Coal must be left in the earth. If you own any coal
stock, NOW is the time to dump it, regardless of loss, because it
will soon be worthless.
I have no financial connection to the nuclear power industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are not doomed. Don't give up. Immediate action required.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Apr 7, 2008 3:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nuclear power can save us from the collapse of civilization and extinction.
Nuclear is the one source of energy that is actually proven to work for base load
power that produces 14.7 million tons of CO2 LESS than coal per 1000
megawatts per year. Burning coal to make electricity is the #1 source of CO2.
Nuclear power is also far safer than coal. Remember that coal also contains
URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel,
Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron, Sulfur, Boron,
Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Thorium, Calcium, Manganese, Vanadium,
Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium, Molybdenum and Zinc. There is so much of
these elements in coal that cinders and coal smoke are actually valuable ores.

Great damage has been done, but we still have 8 years before natural positive
feedbacks lead to our extinction. Sea level will continue to rise even if we
disappear right now, but that is "minor" compared to poison gas bubbling out of
the ocean and killing almost everything including all of the people.
See the chart on page 274 of "Six Degrees" by Mark Lynas. We have until 2015
to BEGIN REDUCING our total CO2 output and we have until 2050 to actually
reduce our CO2 output by 90%. The curve has to start down by 2015, not we
have to think about it by then. The peak of our CO2 production has to happen in
the next 8 years.
How are YOU going to do it? Go ahead and invest YOUR money.

If we don't follow the schedule in Six Degrees, we will encounter positive
feedbacks which will take the control of the climate out of our hands.
Preventing the fall of civilization is a daunting task, but not yet impossible. We
have to hold the CO2 level to 400 parts per million to have a 75% chance of
avoiding the positive feedbacks. The natural positive feedbacks are explained in
Six Degrees. We have to deal with enormous changes in where agriculture works
because of climate changes that are already unavoidable. Don't give up.

We don't recycle nuclear fuel because spent fuel is valuable and people steal it.
The place it went that it wasn't supposed to go to is Israel. This happened in a
small town near Pittsburgh, PA circa 1970. A company called Numec was in the
business of reprocessing nuclear fuel. I almost took a job there, designing a
nuclear battery for a heart pacemaker. [A nuclear battery would have the
advantage of lasting many times as long as any other battery, eliminating many
surgeries to replace batteries.] Numec did NOT have a reactor. Numec "lost"
half a ton of enriched uranium. It wound up in Israel. The Israelis have fueled
both their nuclear power plants and their nuclear weapons by stealing nuclear
"waste." It could work for any other country, such as Iran or the United States.
It is only when you don't have access to nuclear "waste" that you have to do the
difficult process of enriching uranium, unless you have a Canadian "Candu"
reactor that runs on unenriched uranium.
Numec is no longer in business. The reprocessing of nuclear fuel in the US
stopped. That was the only politically possible solution at that time, given that
private corporations did the reprocessing. My solution would be to reprocess the
fuel at a Government Owned Government Operated [GOGO] facility. At a
GOGO plant, bureaucracy and the multiplicity of ethnicity and religion would
disable the transportation of uranium to Israel or to any unauthorized place.
Nothing heavier than a secret would get out.

Nobody is paying me to post this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is happening already: US agriculture is in danger
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Apr 7, 2008 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Downloaded FROM: Environmental Defense
http://environmentaldefenseblogs.org/
climate411/2008/01/14/global_winds/

This post is by James Wang, Ph.D., a climate scientist at Environmental Defense.

You may have heard about the persistent droughts in the western U.S., Australia,
and other regions. The Upper Colorado River Basin is experiencing a protracted,
multi-year drought that started in 1999. Australia's record drought is threatening
the livelihood of traditional farmers and ranchers.

At what point does a passing drought become a permanent shift to desert
conditions, and why would such a thing happen?

It can happen because of global warming. Climate change can alter global winds,
the strength and location of high and low pressure systems, and other climate
factors.

.........shortened.........Graphics and URLs omitted.

Global winds shape the Earth's climate, determining - in broad strokes - which
areas are tropical, desert, or temperate. Here's a simplified overview of how it
works.

The Sun heats the Earth most intensely in the tropical zone around the equator. The
heated air rises, cools, and then dumps its moisture as rain. That's why there are
rain forests in the tropics.

The now drier air is forced by the continuously rising equatorial air to move
towards the temperate latitudes on either side of the equator. At roughly 30° N and
S - called the "horse latitudes" - it can move no further due to the Earth’s rotation,
and settles to the surface. As the air sinks, it compresses and warms, creating hot,
rain-free conditions. This circulation pattern, called a Hadley cell, is why the
deserts of the world are located just poleward of the tropics, to the north and south.

Poleward of the desert belt, strong, high-altitude winds known as the jet streams
flow from west to east, carrying large storms with them. These mid-latitude,
temperate-region storms are an important source of rain and snow, especially
during the winter season. Much of the world's population lives in the temperate
region. It includes most of the U.S. and southern Canada, most of Europe, East
Asia, southern South America, southern Africa, and southern Australia and New
Zealand.

But climate regions aren't fixed. Several independent studies have found that
global winds are shifting due to global warming, and the shifts are faster than
predicted by climate models. Most recently is this new study in Nature
Geoscience. The tropical belt has widened by several degrees latitude since 1979.
This is consistent with other observations suggesting that the jet streams and storm
tracks have moved poleward.

The drought-stricken Upper Colorado River Basin, which includes Lake Powell, is
located just poleward of the horse latitudes at around 37° N. This has historically
been in the temperate zone, but the desert zone may be gradually encroaching upon
it. (Since nothing is simple, there are other factors contributing to this particular
drought, as well.) Similarly, water-starved Sydney, Australia at 34° S is just
poleward of the southern horse latitude.

What we may be seeing here is not so much drought as desertification - a shift in
global climate patterns due to global warming. Areas that used to be in temperate
zones may be shifting into desert, while areas that had been arid receive more
precipitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spheres and Globes
Posted by: talkville on Apr 7, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global Warming, Global Cooling, Global Smelting, Global Agri-Business, Global Deserts, Global Jungles.... it's ALL hazardous, and not only to health, but to dignity, to justice, to equity, to proportion, to scale, to existence! What did one expect of Global Capitalism? Health? Leisure? Wellbeing? Fullness? "Happiness"? Truth?

Perhaps a committee could be formed somewhere in the majority-world, set up to welcome all the new-comers to the Globe of the Dis-possessed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement