Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Amid Bad Publicity, Drug Company Uses Progressive Union to Peddle Its Products

By Maggie Mahar, Health Beat. Posted March 26, 2008.


Why is the IAEP, a division of the SEIU, using union letterhead to endorse Lipitor and push drug sales pitches on its members?
Advertisement

A couple of weeks ago Dr. Alicia Fernandez, an associate professor of clinical medicine at UC San Francisco, received a very unusual letter from the International Association of EMTS and Paramedics, an affiliate of the National Association of Government Employees (IAEP/SEIU).

The letter began by noting that Fernandez is part of the union's approved physician network, and then launched into what can only be described as a shameless sales pitch for Lipitor, Pfizer's blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drug.

First, the alarming statistics presented in the letter:

  • 1 in 3 adults has some form of CVD (cardiovascular disease)
  • About every 26 seconds, an American will suffer a coronary event
  • Stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability in the United States
  • Every 45 seconds, someone will suffer a stroke.

Then, the endorsement: "Lipitor is available to our members through their prescription plan. IAEP leadership stands behind LIPITOR as the lipid-lowering agent of choice when it is prescribed by a physician. [my emphasis] This confidence in LIPITOR is based on its proven efficacy and is supported by its vast clinical experience of more than 15 years ..."

The letter went on, at length, to praise Lipitor's benefits and to downplay the drug's risks. In clinical trials, the letter states, "The most common adverse events were constipation, flatulence, dyspepsia and abdominal pain." But while other risks may not be as "common," they are certainly worth mentioning. They include memory loss, which can look like Alzheimer's, and severe muscle pain.

A few days ago, Fernandez received a second, identical letter. Never before in her professional experience had she received a drug ad from a union.

"I've never seen anything like this. I've never seen labor endorse a drug product," she told me. "This is incredible." Unfortunately, Fernandez adds, this is not the first time that she has seen a drug company use a progressive organization to promote its product.

In this case, the Lipitor letter is signed by "Matthew Levy," the director of IAEP. "But this is clearly a joint production between the drug company and the union," Fernandez notes. "Much of the letter is written in medical language -- looks like it is written by Pfizer folks. And at the bottom of the second page of the letter there is a Pfizer copyright: '2007 Pfizer Inc. All rights reserved. Filed in USA/December 2007.' Yet it is written on the IAEP/SEIU letterhead."

Why would Pfizer need the union's help in peddling its drug? Lipitor, after all, is the best-selling drug in the world, with sales of almost $13 billion in 2006.

But recently, Lipitor has been attracting some decidedly negative publicity.

In January Business Week published a cover story that asked, "Do Cholesterol Drugs Do Any Good?" which blew the lid off the theory that "statins" -- drugs like Lipitor, Crestor, Mevacor, Zocor and Pravachol -- can cut the odds that you will die of a heart attack by slowing the production of cholesterol in your body and increasing the liver's ability to remove LDL, or "bad cholesterol," from your blood.

As I wrote at the time, the medical evidence shows that, while these drugs can help some people, they have been widely overprescribed. "Medical research suggests that only about 40 percent to 50 percent of the 18 million Americans taking statins are likely to benefit," says Dr. John Abramson, a clinical instructor at Harvard and author of Overdosed America. "The other 8 or 9 million are exposed to the risks that come with taking statins -- which can include severe muscle pain, memory loss, sexual dysfunction -- and one study shows increased risk of cancer in the elderly -- but there are no studies to show that the drugs will protect these patients against fatal heart attacks."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: disease mongering, progressive organizations, seiu, labor unions, big pharma, pfizer, drug companies, cholesterol drugs, lipitor

Maggie Mahar is a fellow at the Century Foundation and the author of Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much (Harper/Collins 2006) and Bull! A History of the Boom, 1982–1999 (Harper/Collins, 2003).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Progressive Unions ought to be fighting to legalize Cannibas !
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 26, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That they're working for Big Pharma is no different from their refusal to fight for a Green America yet take a battering from Big Auto !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unfree
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Mar 26, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all ok to push their product's even if they can kill you, they have FDA approval!!! They may kill you faster then your health symptoms .
Rest in peace these drugs are government approved!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's about Jobs...
Posted by: drricklippin on Mar 26, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Which is the union's fundamental concern.

I don't know how many health care jobs are in SEIU but most IAEP jobs are health care jobs I believe.

But both SEIU or IAEP as a subset actually benefit from our current high tech-high cost disease care model of health care .Actually IAEP benefits from a "emergency model" of health care

Neither IAEP/SEIU benefits from a prevention model. (although one could argue that statins like Lipitor are preventative medicine)

But in the end out of economic necessity jobs in IAEP/SEIU need to transist from treatment to prevention based.

That is the challenge for these unions and for all of us.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shameful and Disgusting
Posted by: Gravitas on Mar 26, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pharma turns my stomach! But what is even worse is everyone else's willing to go along with them. Does ANYONE still have a backbone left when it comes to turning down money for the sake of priniciples? No, don't anwer that, the truth is too hard to take. Is the public even capable of turning off their damn televisions and research the issues for themselves once in awhile??? I KNOW after researching weight stigma for over two decades that many health problems are coming from the dangerous pills, not our own bodies. And in many other conditions, the pills are causing more problems than the diseases themselves. And it affects all of us because the drugs end up in our drinking water. I curse you demon pharma!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shameful and Disgusting Posted by: drricklippin
When rich people are in charge
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 26, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When rich people are in charge, expect abuse and stoopidity. They are incapable of being human.

If your union is run by rich people, that ain't much of a union is it? Don't stand for it, fire the rich fuckers and take it back.

Every time a worker trusts a rich person, the worker gets raped. Stop trusting rich people. It's past time the "help" rose up and beat down their rulers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Buy your drugs at Costco
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 26, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Visit Costco's website and you'll find a search field that allows price comparisons between brand-name drugs and generic ones sold by the "Big Box" store.

Generally speaking, Costco will beat your local pharmacy by 25 - 40%, more than enough to offset its annual membership fee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is bad
Posted by: willymack on Mar 26, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really bad. The incestual relationship between trade unions and industries are a hallmark of the old Soviet Union and present-day China, and wholly inappropriate in a nation calling itself a democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Me Ranting
Posted by: meranting on Mar 26, 2008 11:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone's in bed with everyone it seems. Except for the American people - guess we can be categorized as 'the nice guy' - hence always finishing last.

I happened to just have written an article over at my blog regarding Montel Williams and his tour with the orange bus - it's along the same lines of this article.

Me Ranting - Sittin' in the South - Can't Shut My Mouth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yet they still ask me why I never went back . . .
Posted by: drjasonmd on Mar 27, 2008 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Statins are barely useful and mostly harmful. Save the money and get a gym membership.

COX-2 inhibitors do not provide any greater pain releif than naproxen but they cost 10 times more and can kill you.

Antidepressants are rarely much more effective than placebo and can kill you.

Plastic surgery is a betrayal of the Hippocratic Oath and can kill you.

Restless leg syndrome is not a disease and can't kill you.

Your doctor prescribed it, after the drug company pimped it, after the FDA approved it, after a publicly funded university discovered it. But don't worry, by the time it goes generic, they'll come up with something new that can kill you.

The mangos are really sweet today!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michelle Ringuette, SEIU
Posted by: mringuette on Mar 27, 2008 9:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SEIU Does Not Endorse Lipitor or Any Other Product
Statement of Andy Stern, president of SEIU

"Recently, a letter appearing to endorse a well-known pharmaceutical was circulated by the International Association of EMTS and Paramedics, an affiliate of the National Association of Government Employees (IAEP/SEIU).

"The letter was generated by a Local Union staff member unfamiliar with SEIU's clear policies against product endorsement. The Local has ended their relationship with the product. SEIU does not endorse products."

###

The 1.9 million member Service Employees International Union is united by the belief in the dignity and worth of workers and the services they provide and dedicated to improving the lives of workers and their families and creating a more just and humane society.

SEIU members are winning better wages, health care, and more secure jobs for our communities, while uniting their strength with their counterparts around the world to help ensure that workers, not just corporations and CEOs, benefit from today's global economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The President of SEIU Responds
Posted by: maggiem on Mar 28, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, the National Association of Government Employees (SEIU).
has responded to the story that its affiliate, the International Association of EMTS and Paramedics (IAEP/SEIU), has been sending out letters to doctors, endorsing
Pfizer’s blockbuster drug, Lipitor. (See comment just above this one.)

Lipitor, like other statins, has been getting some bad publicity of late. See “The Cholesterol Con” http://www.healthbeatblog.org/2008/02/the-cholesterol.html) and apparently someone decided Lipitor needed a boost.

In a reply posted here yesterday, Andy Stern, president of SEIU, offers a fairly simple explanation:

"The letter was generated by a Local Union staff member unfamiliar with SEIU's clear policies against product endorsement. The Local has ended their relationship with the product. SEIU does not endorse products.”

But Matthew Levy, the director of IAEP who signed the letter to the doctors, was not merely a “local union staff member” IAEP’s national communications director told me that Levy is “director” of the organization—and that’s how he signed his name on the Lipitor letter, which was written on IAEP/SEIU letterhead.

But maybe Matthew Levy is new to the organization and just wasn’t aware that he wasn’t supposed to write letters saying that
the “IAEP leadership stands behind LIPITOR as the lipid-lowering agent of choice”?

I decided to find out a little more about Levy. Here is what I discovered: he has been with the union since 2001. He began as a lowly “business rep,” but by 2003, he had been promoted to the executive board, and in the years that followed, “unionfact.com” reveals that his career flourished: http://www.unionfacts.com/unions/unionOfficersDetail.cfm? ID=500001&OID=1433383&fname=MATTHEW&lname=LEVY

Matthew Levy
Year Salary % Raise Title
2006 $ 66,339 20.6% Representative
2004 $ 55,000 19.5% Executive Board
2003 $ 46,023 619.1% Exec. Board

At the end of 2006, Union Facts lists Levy as one of the Top 10 leaders of the National Association of Government Employees SEIU (NAGE). By then his salary had soared to $92, 723. http://www.unionfacts.com/unions/unionProfile.cfm?id=500001
(NOTE: David Holway is the national president of IAEP, so theseare IAEP’s top officers.)

Leadership
Top 10 International NAGE Leaders & Staff (by Salary)
Name Title Total Compensation
David Holway National President $ 233,097

Richard Barry General Counsel $ 137,177

Barbara Osgood Nat'l Exec V.P. $ 133,194

Paul Birks National V.P. $ 132,926

James Farley Nat'l Exec V.P. $ 130,961

Charles Warren Organizing $ 111,028

David Bernard Representative $ 110,787

Joseph Monahan Attorney $ 93,751

James Hartman Finance $ 93,550

Matthew Levy Representative $ 92,723

I assume that Levy was promoted from "Representative" to "Director" sometime in the past year. I don't know what his salary is now, but clearly he isn't a lowly-paid member of the staff.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They tried using an Exxon letterhead.
Posted by: davescott on Mar 31, 2008 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it didnt work as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]