Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

The Empowered Patient: How to Protect Yourself From Hospital Errors

By Maggie Mahar, Health Beat. Posted March 10, 2008.


Patients have more rights than they think.
Advertisement

Julia Hallisy recently sent me her book, The Empowered Patient (PatientsafetyCA.org, 2008). It is at once one of the most pragmatic and one of the most moving health care books that I have ever read.

Hallisy's daughter, Kate, was diagnosed with an aggressive eye cancer when she was five months old. Over the next decade, she went through radiation, chemo, reconstructive surgery, an operation to remove her right eye, a hospital-acquired infection that led to toxic-shock syndrome and an above-the-knee amputation. Kate died in 2000. She was eleven years old.

Remarkably, The Empowered Patient is not an angry book. It is not maudlin. To her great credit, Hallisy manages to keep her tone matter-of-fact as she tells her reader what every patient and every patient's advocate needs to know about how to stay safe in a hospital.

First she reminds us of the mind-boggling number of errors that occur in our hospitals every year. "As many as 95,000 people die annually" as a result of adverse events ranging from infections to fatal drug reactions. It's hard to grasp just how many people are dying until Hallisy gives us what she calls "a tragic reference point." The number of lives lost to medical error is roughly equivalent to a World Trade Center attack occurring every two weeks during the year.

Hallisy's 300-page book is eminently readable, and filled with enormously useful detail. As she points out "the media and the government do try to warn us against the dangers we are up against with admonitions such as, 'Make sure all your healthcare providers wash their hands before touching you,' or 'Don't sign blanket consent forms,' or 'Check your medication ... '

"Good advice," writes Hallisy, "but what exactly are you supposed to do to ensure that these things actually happen? Many of you reading this right now don't know that you have a right to customize your consent form."

I certainly didn't.

Hallisy and her husband learned how to keep their daughter safe the hard way. Although Kate was treated in some of the finest hospitals in the San Francisco area, "During all those years of interacting with physicians and hospitals, I encountered virtually every problem a patient and their loved ones can face ... My husband and I became more savvy and educated the longer my daughter's illness went on. As we progressed, we slowly came to realize that the quality of healthcare she was receiving, as mediocre as it sometimes was, was actually far superior to the care other families around us in the hospital were receiving. They began to notice this discrepancy as well, and they wanted to know how we knew the things we did and who had given us such valuable 'inside' information. We had to explain to them that we had come across everything we knew ... by watching our daughter suffer through medical errors, misdiagnoses and inexperienced medical providers, and investigating the mistakes and taking steps to make sure they didn't occur again."

Begin with the consent form. It turns out that if you want to be certain that you know who will be caring for you while you are in the hospital, you should look carefully at the "Terms and Conditions of Service" on your consent form. It may well say:

"Attending physicians may be assisted by medical students, interns, residents and postgraduate fellows during the care of each patient. The patient agrees to treatment by these persons while under the direction or supervision of the attending physician."

Hallisy explains that "direction" and "supervision" have distinct meanings. If the attending physician is "directing" that only requires that he be available for questions. When "supervising," by contrast, he should be physically present and personally overseeing the proceedings.

Of course residents need to practice on someone. Hallisy is not recommending that you "refuse all outright care by medical residents." But she is suggesting that you "not give away blanket permission for inexperienced or unsupervised medical personnel to take care of your health care when a lot is at stake." [my emphasis]

Instead, she advises altering the form to read: "Patient agrees to treatment by residents and interns on an individual basis on an informed consent basis. Patient expects such persons to be under the direct and daily supervision of attending physician." Then be sure to initial the change.

The first sentence ensures that you will meet the residents "who will be writing orders and making health care decision -- sometimes behind the scenes. This gives you a chance to find out a little about his or her level of expertise and to judge whether this person seems competent to treat your condition."

Hallisy points out that if you or a loved one are going in for surgery, and you want to make sure that your surgeon is actually performing the procedure -- or at least that he or she will be in the room -- you need to take a close look at the "Authorization for Surgery' portion of the consent form.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: patient rights, safety, hospital

Maggie Mahar is a fellow at The Century Foundation and the author of Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much (Harper/Collins 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is very good information
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Mar 10, 2008 8:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be sure you are in a hospital where everyone speaks your language. I spent 12 hours in the emergency room in southern Ca. I was there on business and found out the hard way, my doctor in Or had released me too soon. I was finally given a room and the first person who had spoken English I could understand came from the billing office to let me know I already had a bill of $17,000! The nurses and everyone at the hospital were from somewhere else, Mexico, El Salvador, Japan, Nigeria, Haiti, Guatemala, Korea, etc. It was the scarriest experience of my life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What racist BS! Posted by: logansafi
» RE: What racist BS! Posted by: AFLLthrman
» Racist? NONSENSE! Posted by: foreverhope
Informed Consent Is a Patient Right
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 12, 2008 1:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a Radiologic Technologist and have been in practice for more than 20 years in hospitals and clinics, large and small. I have always followed the fullest understanding of patient's rights to know what is happening, who ordered it, why it is being done and explaining any possible risks or adverse outcomes that could result. Then I ask for their consent to do the procedure.

If any patient or family member with responsibility for the patient asks a question I cannot answer I contact the ordering/attending practitioner and get the answer. If they question the necessity for the procedure I ask them if they have had it explained to them by their Nurse or Physician. if the answer is no, I inform them that they have the right to refuse the procedure or treatment and can request that the ordering practitioner or a designated representative explain it to them.

I am not in the business or practice of selling what is on the chart to patients and they should not have to take leaps of blind faith to get treated. Sometimes orders are not clear, correctly ordered or patients properly screened for adverse reactions to pharmaceuticals or treatments. Every practitioner M.D., D.O., R.N.P., C.R.N.A., & P.A. has a responsibility to treat the patient and not the chart. They have a solemn obligation to explain what they are ordering, why and what it will do for them BEFORE they submit to treatment.

Sadly, this is not the norm in most American healthcare. I'm not making excuses but people get busy, get callous and just plain old tired of repeating the same information over and over. The problem is that it is the job of every person involved in patient care to look after the welfare of their patients. No excuses- it comes with the job.

When you are having anything new done to you you have a right to know what it is, what it is for, who ordered it and how it will improve your care. You have a right to know the credentials of the person attending to you. Any properly trained and licensed professional should not be offended- I certainly am not.

Finally, most hospitals have an ombudsman or patient advocate set up to handle patient concerns regarding their care or that of a loved one. Please use this resource. Ask if such a person exists at the hospital you use and ask that such an office be created if one does not exist.

What tends to get forgotten in the rush and the stress and the long hours is that sick, injured people put great faith and trust into a large group of people's hands, most of whom they do not know, because they want relief from pain or to get well. They many times are trusting their very lives to our skills, attention and thoroughness. Patients- all of them- deserve our very best. Every time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is very sad...
Posted by: sanddollar on Mar 12, 2008 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that at a time in most people's lives (as a patient) when they have so much else to work on (like healing), they must be so much on their toes as to know which specific technical questions to ask, which contract alterations to make, which signs to post on their door, etc. to get what they expect from practiced medicine... maybe.

The books sounds very helpful. It's the larger situation with medicine in America, of both the system and the practice, that's sad on so many levels.

Also - the figure cited in the article, of 95,000 people per year dying from preventable medical errors (death rate of one 9/11 episode every two weeks), is old information. It's been updated, and is actually twice that much - 195,000 in each year of 2000, 2001, and 2002.
See http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/11856.php

195,000 is a far greater total than the combined number of deaths from homicides, plus suicides, plus auto accidents, plus all other accidents, plus drug overdoses, plus from HIV/AIDS. Mind you, these were only the people who died from the mistakes. Many more don't die, but go through living hells because a medical person didn't do what they were supposed to do.

The total number of people who die each year from all aspects of medicine itself (called iatrogenic deaths, those induced inadvertently by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedure) is far greater still - nearly 800,000 per year.
See http://www.ourcivilization.com/medicine/usamed.htm
or
http://www.healthe-livingnews.com/articles /death_by_medicine_part_1.html
(delete the space following the word "articles" to dial in the URL)

This makes medicine the biggest cause of death in America - more than heart disease or cancer.

Add to this the results of a recent survey of doctors revealing that nearly half of them - 46% - admit failing to report incompetent, unethical, or unprofessional medical behavior by their colleagues.
See - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22083982/

Buyer beware.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

POWER DYNAMICS IN HEALTH CARE ARE CHANGING
Posted by: drricklippin on Mar 12, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Maggie!

Many factors-not the least of which is the democratization of medical information through the internet-is profoundly changing the doctor-patient relationship.

This is actually painful for some patients but mostly paternalistic doctors who do not want to reliquish any power at all to patients.But a more mature(adult-adult) relationship is becoming manifest.

From a practical standpoint in hospitals JCAHO has a campaign called "Just Ask".This and similair campaigns herald a new era of the health professional as educator in addition to the healer.

Welcome to the 21st Century!

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arrogance, Abuse, Fraud, Medical Malpractice: How Some Physicians Beg for Law Suites
Posted by: patrickdodd on Mar 12, 2008 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are still not facing the truth!!! What we are seeing is what Medical care looks like under fascism. Greedy physicians addicted to money are literally abusing and battering patients for the sake of profit.
Patients and lawyers who file suites against Physicians are depicted as greedy, money grubbing opportunist. 1 It turns out this is more projection than reality. 2 In other words it is the physicians who are the greedy, money grubbing opportunists (not shy about initiating law suits themselves), and the patients and their lawyers are just fighting back against an arrogant disregard for patients rights, dignity, and health, against incompetence and even fraud. In a real way a vast body of Physicians have waged war on patients. Arrogantly imposing their will and their interest against the patients will and best interest. Below are a few examples of how Physicians abuse patients for personal profit.

1. An overwhelming number of physicians get kick backs and other economic incentives from pharmaceutical companies, not only for being willing to prescribe a drug, or implant a devise, but also for research. Physicians often get kickbacks from other Physicians and hospitals to which they refer patients. Influence by these interest, many physicians prescribe medications or procedures they know are not the most effective response to a problem or even for a problem you may not have. 3

2. Physicians have a history of performing unnecessary surgeries. 4. They will fail to tell a patient of less radical alternatives, fail to disclose and mislead patients about risks, and even encourage a patient to elect surgeries that are not good for their health. Breast implants are just one example. Implants are never permanent. Most will require another surgery within five years, virtually 100% fail within 10 years. 5 Reconstruction after a mastectomy requires multiple surgeries (including one on the healthy breast), and thus provides a whole string of opportunities for the surgeon to make a lot of money. For women with cancer this is particularly cruel even murderous as evidence indicates that physical trauma the like of multiple surgeries can encourage spread the cancer. 6. This trauma induced cancer growth risk is virtually never revealed. Even women’s magazines have described new “perky” breasts, and perhaps even a tummy tuck, as a couple among ten reasons to “be glad you have breast cancer.” 7 The only unsolicited call I ever remember receiving from my breast cancer surgeon was to inquire as to why I would turn down reconstruction. (Wonder if she was to get a kickback from the plastic surgeon, who acted like he got kickbacks for implants.)

3. Physicians often employ a bait and switch operation. That is you agree to a surgery by a certain physician, and then once under anesthesia a switch is pulled. The person actually performing the surgery is much less experienced, or this may even be their first surgery. Sometimes the surgeon you thought was performing is in attendance supervising. Your life threatening surgery is being used as a training and you are an unwitting breathing cadaver. Although research indicates that 87% of patients would allow training if asked, making this sort of medical fraud unnecessary, it would take time to explain to the patient and the patient might set terms or limitations, such as on the number of trainees to be performing a procedure. 8. Other times the person you thought was performing the surgery has moved on to a high paying client and left you with a resident under no supervision. The surgeon you thought was performing gets paid for miraculously doing two surgeries at once in two different locations. 9 The resident is on salary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do You Have a Web Page?? Posted by: Andie927
This is B.S.
Posted by: patrickdodd on Mar 12, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, but I do not want to hear how to keep myself safe from someone who failed. I have tried her suggestions. New consent forms were brought for me to sign after I was druged. Informed consent may be a right; but it is not practiced. Only 4% of those who should file suits do so. The physicians know by bean counting that they can pay the malpractice premiums and still make big money on kickbacks, and more. There is more than this author realizes still yet, and her suggestions are insufficent to guarantee safty. Fact is without reform, you cannot keep yourself safe. It takes time to get through, but read the above if you want to know more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is B.S. Posted by: logansafi
Green Party Platform;
Posted by: Andie927 on Mar 12, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although not an immediate solution, it will at least move us in the right direction!

The Green Party platform, which means Every candidate, is committed to Non-Profit Single-payer Universal Healthcare! After John Edwards dropped out, I can't bring myself to support these two parties left, or any of the three candidates! Their all talking the same thing,
MORE OF THE SAME INSUANCE NOT HEALTHCARE!!

I found the Green Party, NO Corporate Money, sure makes a difference! Think about giving them some support, if you truely want to change healthcare in this country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sadly I must agree
Posted by: tbpmom56 on Mar 12, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work in a busy mid-sized, urban hospital. I am an RN with over 12 years working on a busy Med-Surg unit and then another 10 years in SICU and CVICU, and I must sadly agree that hospitals can be dangerous places.
Nurses are the greatest expense in a hospital and staffing ratios are not based on acuity or on the time that that is needed for patient education, patient and family emotional support, reviewing charts, labs, or research but rather it is always based on the numbers .
Perhaps more patients and families should ask what is the nurse-patient ratio, and not sit quiet when told "we are working short today".
But the problem is so great and we need a total restructuring of the system. Insurance companies should not dictate how I use my time with my patients. I should not be forced to double and triple documenting of all that I do just so the hospital has less difficulty getting reimbursement form the 3rd party payers--and that goes on daily.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sadly I must agree Posted by: maggiem
Get involved!
Posted by: AvalonSeeker on Mar 12, 2008 5:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a nurse for 28 years, and one of the most important things YOU as a patient/consumer can do is PUSH for legislation that eliminates or limits mandatory overtime as a staffing tool and setting minimum patient/staff ratios. I have had to care for up to 14-15 medical/surgical patients during one shift with just one nurses aide. It makes me ill to think just how healthcare has become such a huge business the patients get lost in the shuffle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cathyc Posted by: foreverhope
» Foreverhope Posted by: Cathyc
» cathyc Posted by: foreverhope
How surgeries are done
Posted by: doctorsquared on Mar 13, 2008 12:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In an academic hospital, the chief resident (5th to 7th year of training after med school) initially preps and drapes the patient, and makes the initial incision. S/He is helped out with retraction and simple knot tying / cutting sutures by an intern or second year resident. The attending or professor of surgery usually scrubs into surgery for as long as is necessary to perform with the chief resident, or closely direct, any critical parts of the procedure. This may be the entire case, in complicated surgeries, or very little (or none), if it is a routine hernia repair or appendectomy. This is how surgeons are made. If you don't like it, fine for you, but then there won't be any surgeons in 30 years when those attendings retire, and you or your child might die from trauma or appendicitis in the middle of the night, or from a cancer that might have been resected. Be careful what you wish for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How surgeries are done Posted by: patrickdodd