Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

What If Autism Were Contagious?

By Kim Stagliano, Huffington Post. Posted February 12, 2008.


It's time to stop downplaying the seriousness of autism.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


Two controversies are swirling in the autism world. The first is over the safety of vaccines as they may relate to the cause/onset of this life altering disorder. The recent airing of ABC's Eli Stone episode about a woman who sued a pharmaceutical company (and won) on behalf of her autistic son brought the vaccine Hatfields and McCoy's roaring into the headlines, even as the American Academy of Pediatricians demanded the program's censorship. (You can read about that HERE in David Kirby's Huffington Post piece.) The second is the whether or not there is any epidemic at all, brought up by Dr. Nancy Minshew, who runs the Center for Excellence in Autism Research at Pitt.



The media reports almost daily that drug companies have misreported clinical trial results, marketed ineffective drugs, and lied to doctors and consumers alike about their products' efficacy and safety. And yet we're expected to believe that the dozens of vaccines administered to infants and toddlers are 100% safe, 100% of the time, for 100% of children, and have absolutely no connection to autism. Man, that's harder to swallow than one of those horse sized prenatal vitamins the OB's dole out along with that mercury laden flu shot.



When I write about vaccines and autism and the desire for better safety testing, I often get the same response from people: "Do you want Polio back?" My instinct is to slap them. Such a stupid question. No one wants Polio back. But that question has led me to the question, "What if autism were contagious?" Would the response to the 1 in 150 rate of diagnosis change from, "Oh my, what a shame. We'd better learn how to diagnose it earlier." to "We'd better figure out the cause and come up with treatments immediately!" Would we go into attack mode as we did for AIDS, which in 30 years has seen great improvement in prevention and treatment?



If you think the photos of the old Polio wards are frightening, take a day off and go visit a classroom for children on the severe end of the autism spectrum. You'll see children who are ambulatory and yet cannot care for their most basic needs. They will require a lifetime of care. Can you tell me that these children are not as disabled as those who contracted Polio?



Then there's the "epidemic" question. It's as if someone at the top decided, "It's time to make autism appear to be less of a threat." following that Eli Stone episode. Dr. Nancy Minshew, who heads up a center devoted to autism, has changed her mind about the epidemic. She is quoted in an article in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, "I used to think there were more cases [than in past years], but I don't think so any more." She is now convinced that the higher numbers are "not an increase in the number of cases, but are an improvement in recognition." (Is she kidding? I'm thinking of inviting her over for dinner so she can see the epidemic in action.)



Poof! Thanks to her words, the worry over autism has disappeared like Bruce Willis' hair. Whoopee! She also had the gall to say that autism used to be diagnosed as schizophrenia and that accounts for some of the diagnostic substitution. Oh? I wish I'd known so I could have named my girls Sybil, Sybil and Sybil.



Dr. Minshew happens to be on the Autism Speaks' Scientific Advisory Board. Autism Speaks was founded by Bob and Suzanne Wright in response to the crisis in rising autism numbers. Suddenly one of their top scientists says there is no crisis. Boy, autism sure looks like a crisis in my house. And at my kids' schools, where there are entire classrooms devoted to teaching kids on the spectrum. And at Barnes and Noble where books pop up like zits on prom night about all things autism.



Please tell me why our doctors and national institutions and even charities have abandoned children with autism, instead of setting out to conquer this neurological crippler. What if autism were contagious? Would our kids matter then?



Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, vaccine, autism, abc, eli stone

Kim Stagliano is Managing Editor of AgeofAutism.com, a writer and the mother of three daughters with autism. She lives in CT with her husband Mark and the girls. She blogs at KimStagliano.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oh dear...
Posted by: spikeyone on Feb 12, 2008 4:55 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That vaccines have no connection to autism should not be hard to swallow unless you're already full of the garbage put out by all the anti-vac quacks. Clearly you've drank your fill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your post makes no sense
Posted by: autismnewsbeat on Feb 12, 2008 6:40 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if frogs had wings? Autism isn't contagious, and asking "what if" is pointless and adds nothing to the knowledge base. Practically everything thing you wrote is wrong. There is no clear evidence for the vaccine autism link. Autism used to be called childhood schizophrenia. A study coming out this summer shows that 20 percent of adults confined in one hospital with schizophrenia meet the criteria for autism. You need to listen better, you need to better understand what researchers write, and you need to drop the attitude and open your mind. The only "controversy" is the one you imagine. Among bona fide researchers, the vaccine-autism link has been long dismissed, and for good reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: YOUR post makes no sense Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Your post makes no sense Posted by: debjbaba
» My son's make sense to me. Posted by: Aposterioriperception
» What if someone you care about had autism? Posted by: Aposterioriperception
vaccines did damage kids
Posted by: snowmitt on Feb 12, 2008 6:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an Occupational Therapist who works with autistic kids, and has an autistic nephew (who was developing normally till he got the MMR vaccine at 18 months). Read the book "Evidence of Harm" (by a wall street journal reporter--I think his name is David Kelly). I heard him speak at a seminar; he showed how the fda kept repeating studies, by making them more inclusive and invalid until they got the percentage of harm from 15% to effectively 0%. There is a big difference between what Thermerisal (mercury containing preservative) can do to an adult in a flu shot vs. what it does to a newly forming nervous system. The supposed 50 years of safe vaccines reports were from single use bottles, the autism rate spiked when the drug cos. switched to multi-use bottles (to save pennies in costs) and added that preservative. The danish study that supposedly shows autism rates increasing after thermerisol was stopped were flawed; they vastly broadened the range of where kids diagnosed with autism were counted (from hospitals alone, which was very rare, to drs. offices and outpatient clinics as well, which made the total number of kids look like it increased). The Patriot Act included an ammendment, made retroactive, against suing any maker of a vaccine. This was done to protect E.I. Lilly. As far as I know, that amendment was never repealed, and kids are still receiving vaccines containing thermerisol!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vaccines did damage kids Posted by: autismnewsbeat
Visit those classrooms
Posted by: Ginga on Feb 12, 2008 8:36 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was an early childhood special education teacher until my retirement 10 years ago. In the last ten years of my teaching career, there was a steady rapid rise in the number of autistic children in our program. No amount of "better diagnostic methods" would account for this rise. Is it not possible that some children have a genetic weakness that is not manifested until exposed to elements like mercury or other pollutants that exist in our vaccines and even in the air around us? And yes, polio was a dread disease but so is autism! The cause and possible cure must be found.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stealth Adapted Viruses: An Infectious Cause of Autism
Posted by: s3support on Feb 12, 2008 9:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear readers,

I have presented evidence that autism results from maternal transmission of brain damaging viruses. The viruses evade elimination by the immune system through the deletion (or mutation) of the few critical components normally targeted by anti-viral lymphocytes. I have used the term "stealth adapted" for such viruses. Additional information on stealth adapted viruses causing autism is available at www.s3support.com

Fortunately, the body is not solely dependent upon the immune system for its anti-viral defenses. It can also utilize an alternative cellular energy (ACE) pathway to help overcome the cell damaging effects of both stealth adapted and conventional viruses.

A simple protocol has been devised that expedites the healing of skin lesions caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and herpes zoster virus (HZV). It also greatly reduces the frequency of future outbreaks of herpes virus infections. The studies are being conducted in a Progressive Medicine research clinic in Fort Smith, Arkansas.

The protocol was recently tested on three autistic children with very encouraging results. Parents of children with autism may wish to contact me via e-mail at s3support@mail.com for further details of this trial.

I am also interested in addressing the misinformation on autism that has been propagated, possibly inadvertently, by both the Government and many of the major autism advocacy groups. When the available data are objectively considered, it is clear that Kim is actually correct: Autism does have a contageous component. More importantly, this insight may help motivate those at risk for having an autistic child to take strong preventative actions. Kind regards, W. John Martin, MD, PhD. Institute of Progressive Medicine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's An Elephant in the Room
Posted by: Liberty G on Feb 13, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I believe there is a connection between vaccines and autism, nobody is talking about the other big factor for many children - toxic chemicals in the everyday home and school environments!

Some autism organizations and many scientists have begun to recognize the role such chemicals can play in causing and/or exacerbating learning disabilities. Cleaning chemicals, pesticides, endocrine disrupters are all suspects.

As the director of an organization, Toxics Information Project (TIP) educating on toxic chemicals in everyday life and healthier alternatives, I explore all kinds of research & reports. More poignantly, I know of at least two mothers here in RI that combatted there own sons autism spectrum diagnoses successfully. They got their children's schools to clear the classroom of chemicals. Within two weeks, one boy went from getting 2 or 3 right on a quiz to acing a test with 100 per cent! The other mother reports that with a chem-free school environment, her son was able to discontinue Ritalin.

Anecdotal - yes. That's another way of saying, "What happens in the real world, not just manipulable and iffy statistics". "Proof" is almost impossible to come by in our world with multiple hazards, combined with possible genetic vulnerability. But why take a chance with a child's mind - and life?

Check out some of the info re: Kids & Toxics at:
www.toxicsinfo.org/TIPS_kids.htm, including some
on autism and learning disabilities:
www.toxicsinfo.org/kids/autism/AutismShortHandout.htm
www.toxicsinfo.org/kids/autism/DiscoverArticle.htm
www.toxicsinfo.org/kids/autism/AutismLinked.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very fair points
Posted by: HappyChucks on Feb 13, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously there's not a 1:1 correlation between vaccinations & autism. If there were than every child would end up being diagnosed. But it is reasonalbe to acknowledge there may be some correlation, even if it's just a trigger, and not the full cause, for a very small percentage of children.

I wrote about this same issue today at greater length on my blog: HappyChucks.com

Yes, there's probably a genetic component.

Yes, there's probably more environmental toxins than ever before.

Yes, there's more genetically engineered food than ever before.

Yes, there's more vaccines given, and more at the same time, than ever before.

And Yes, there's more autism than ever before.

I don't believe vaccinations have NOTHING to do with the problem and should be given a free pass. Doesn't pass the smell test for me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sybil?
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Feb 13, 2008 10:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a couple of points -

the u.s. did not go on an all out attack on aids - under the reagan administration aids was allowed to fester in the gay community - because it was thought to be a "gay disease" and it was o.k. for all those folks to die...it took years and the efforts of groups like 'act up' to get aids research to the fore, and even now, aids research is grossly underfunded.

sybil was not bipolar/schizophrenic - she had multiple personality disorder.


this is not meant to minimize the seriousness of autism, if the 1:150 figure is correct, it IS an epidemic and we need to do more in terms of learning why it happens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lyme Disease and Autism
Posted by: Urgelt on Feb 15, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scientists recently found a link between Lyme Disease and autism. It's unlikely that Lyme is a singular cause, but it may be a factor.

Google for more information.

Lyme is poorly studied. One of the unanswered questions is whether it can be transmitted from human to human through bodily fluid contact. No studies have been done examining mother-to-fetus infection.

Lyme's ability to infect the brain and produce neuropsychological damage is well known. The theory that Lyme may be responsible for up to a third of autism cases is at least plausible. More research is required to nail it down, however.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no comparison.
Posted by: A_Quiet_American on Feb 15, 2008 5:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a difference between polio, or AIDS, and autism. Polio and AIDS can be fatal; autism cannot. Polio and AIDS impair the quality of life of people who have these conditions; autism does not. Polio and AIDS are diseases; autism is a different way of being.

There is no comparison.

I am quite saddened when the view that autism is a disease is promoted in progressive publications. Progressivism is supposed to be about equal acceptance of all people and diversity.

I am an autistic adult, a mother of autistic children, and a regular AlterNet reader, if anyone would like to question my credentials.


(I apparently posted this in the wrong place before... hoping this works now..)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Autism is not a disease, it is a normal human variation
Posted by: Joni50 on Feb 18, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am disappointed with Alternet for posting this article. It is comparable to asking, what if homosexuality were contagious? Or what if left handedness or racial minority status was contagious?

It is true that many autistic people suffer from many concurrent social and health problems, and these problems can and should be addressed. However, the autism itself is not disease; it is a normal human variation, like handedness or skin color. The author of this piece seems to be grieving the loss of the imaginary neurotypical children she wishes she'd had, rather than accepting the autistic children she does have.

I am autistic (Asperger's Syndrome) and have had many socialization difficulties through out my life. I'm also very smart, creative, and compassionate, and I wouldn't trade my self with a neurotypical self. Autism is not a disease; it's part of who and what I am.

Some people might say, Apserger's Syndrome isn't "real" autism, and more severely affected children have more serious problems to the degree that they cannot speak or self-care. To the first point I say, autism is a spectrum, and many of our greatest geniuses of the past and present have or had autistic traits. (eg, Mozart, Einstein, etc.) To the second point I say, this is true; there are many children and adults with serious disabilities who need special training and care. Such training and care should be offered with the compassion and respect due all humans. It is far better to accept the person as they are and aim toward improving their quality of life, rather than trying to "cure" them into some fantasized "normal" person.

If I were not autistic, I wouldn't be me. And I've come to enjoy being me. -- Joni

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

autism is NOT horrific
Posted by: michsarabia on Feb 18, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Disability is a matter of perspective.

A blind person is not disabled when task does not require that they visually see objects.

A deaf person is not disabled when the task does not require they hear a sound.

A language learning disabled person is not disabled when a task does not require that they read or write.

An autistic is not disabled when a task does not require accomodating the social needs of those "normal" people who do not understand the autistic's personal communication patterns.

I am diagnosed NLD/Aspergers. My 13 year old son is diagnosed Aspergers.

I have a Master's Degree, and work as a special education teacher, including with young Autism Spectrum people from NLD to a severe level of "PDD-NOS" or mild "classic."

For myself, I have found that once people know why I sometimes "say the wrong thing," or miss something, they are very good at using positive verbal communication to let me know what's happened, and to accomodate my need to be alone when stressed. I am valued for the results I produce in my students at work, I have a successful 17-year marriage, and I have a few rather close (for an autistic) friends.

My son is a straight-A student, a member of the Drama and Chess clubs, and a competitor for the FFA. He currently still requires constant supervision to avoid social consequences, especially from bullies who enjoy playing with his misconceptions of what's going on. However, he is building masking and coping skills, and we anticipate he should be free of the need for that supervision by the time he graduates high school.

We celebrate our strengths; most of our difficulties come from OTHER'S reactions to us.

Since most high-functioning autistic spectrum people actually enjoy the sensory sensitivity, the depth of experience in absorption for detail and particular topics, etc. ...

If autism were contagious, as long as the infrastructure (distribution, etc.) was adjusted to work for autistic sensibilities rather than "normal" sensibilities, nobody would be upset about it. Priorities and focus would change. Crops would continue to be grown, medical and educational care would still be in place, etc. It wouldn't be a disaster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

innacurate and hurtful
Posted by: Ettina on Feb 26, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Firstly, Sybil was diagnosed with multiple personality disorder, not schizophrenia. Schizophrenia does not mean 'split personality' but 'split off from reality'. Nowadays, it is said to have an incidence of 1 out of 100 adults and 1 out of 10,000 children, and is characterized by hallucinations, delusions, loss of self-care skills and motivation, disorganized behavior, etc. Most people's mental image of a 'crazy person' is probably a schizophrenic person.
I've read case reports of childhood schizophrenia dating back as far as the 1940s. Back then, it was a very common diagnosis, about as common as autism is now, and childhood schizophrenics only rarely had overt hallucinations and delusions. Most were socially withdrawn children with bizarre behavior who had language problems such as not speaking, echoing other people, 'metaphorical' speech and odd tone of voice such as monotone. Sound familiar? Autism was restricted to those children who were extremely withdrawn right from birth, were upset by even minor changes, either didn't speak or didn't use speech to communicate before about 7 or so and had at least some nonverbal cognitive skills that were at an average or above-average level. Most of the autistic kids I've met (I volunteer with autistic kids on a regular basis) do not fit that description. In fact, I'm not sure if I can think of even one who did.
Regarding the overall topic of your article, it feels like a slap in the face. My immediate reaction is 'why don't you like me?' - the same thing I cried to myself when I was being bullied. I'm on the autistic spectrum myself, and it really hurts to hear people say they want to eradicate people like me. No, I don't see it as getting 'treatment' but as trying to erase who I am. In the middle ages, we were called changelings and killcrops, and people beat us or tried to trick us to get their real children back. In the 1930s, we were 'useless eaters' on whom the Nazis perfected their techniques of mass murder. Awhile later, we were victims of 'refrigerator mothers', or else 'organisms emitting inappropriate behavior'. Now we're poisoned children, kidnapped children, etc. When will we ever get to be just people, just as valuable and wonderful as the 'perfectly' normal people?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

enter this link
Posted by: fredy123456777 on Mar 4, 2008 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here see
Posted by: fredy123456777 on Mar 7, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fast delivery
Posted by: fredy123456777 on Mar 7, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement