Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

How Smart Is Your Body?

By Alison Rose Levy, Huffington Post. Posted February 12, 2008.


The body has an amazing capacity to self-regulate, expel infection, and possibly even learn.
Advertisement

We all know that ah-ha! moment when a new insight or experience changes everything. But ah-ha's are the province of the mind, aren't they? Like a backward beast, the body merely drags around our higher mental functions and our opposable thumbs. Despite its amazing capacity to self-heal, it's regarded as a mere mechanical marvel, like the Tin Man in the Wizard of Oz -- to be oiled, excised, and/or flooded with exogenous chemicals, an ingenious contraption incapable of learning, progressing, or manifesting.

But what if the body is smarter than we think? Or understands things we don't? Perhaps it's time for a dialogue.

For two centuries, homeopaths have engaged in an intimate conversation with the body -- regarding it as not just alive, but also capable of learning, acting upon subtle information, and taking hints from nature about how to expel infections, self-regulate, and restore balance.

Homeopathic remedies begin with a given natural substance, progressively diluted (and shaken in a process known as "succussion") until no measurable amount of the material remains. The chosen remedy induces the entire range of symptoms the person suffers and paradoxically prompts the body's capacity to heal them. According to Dana Ullman, a homeopathic educator and author of The Homeopathic Revolution, homeopaths see symptoms as expressions of the body's innate healing response. A homeopathic remedy, like aikido, "goes with" the symptoms, subtly amplifying the healing message so that the body "gets it." Once the body goes "ah-ha," the symptoms express, lessen, and then pass.

Obviously, this method and view sharply contrast with approaches that suppress symptoms, or "fight" disease, the typical "us against them" stance of mainstream western medicine.

In his book, Ullman (recently on radio on Oprah and friends) recounts homeopathy's long history of successful use by a host of monarchs, (the British royal family), world leaders, (including Gandhi, and eleven U.S. Presidents ranging from Lincoln to Clinton), artists (Beethoven, Renoir, and Pollock), and celebrities, (Marlene Dietrich, Tina Turner, and David Beckham). Countless powerful and smart people -- with ample health care options -- have found homeopathy valuable.

One was Charles Darwin, whose persistent health problems (untreatable by the medicine of his day) debilitated him, making work impossible, Ullman learned. Skeptically, Darwin went to a homeopath, received treatment, and recovered, going on to do his most important research and writing (while living for three more decades.) He never publicly mentioning his homeopathic treatment for fear of his scientific colleagues' derision.

Conventional biological scientists (then and now) resist healing mechanisms outside their paradigm. Like the man who lost his contact lens down a dark alley, but searched for it under a bright street lamp because that's where he could see, they deny even the possibility that homeopathy could convey healing information via mechanisms they can't measure. Since only material substances (rather than information) have agency, surely homeopathy must be either a fraud or a placebo.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: health, medicine, homeopathy, self-healing

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I've got the dumbest body in the history of protoplasm.
Posted by: Longdream on Feb 12, 2008 4:24 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it's smart enough to steer clear of homeopaths.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Temper, temper. Posted by: Longdream
When you're relly ill...
Posted by: dobbie606 on Feb 12, 2008 5:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..and drugs just make you sicker: you'll try anything!
Boy, was this old mechanic surprised when Homeopathy worked.
But the clincher was when a remedy was given to a pet.No placebo effect here.The change for the better was obvious.
Quantum physics goes against mechanistic logic, as does Homeopathy.Hard to fathom.
The doubters/deriders are the ones paying the price of toxic/impaired livers&kidneys,hearts,spleens,etc, from allopathic protocols.But that's v.good for busines$.
Please lookup 'iatrogenic disease'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Defenders of Western Medicine...
Posted by: magistre on Feb 13, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....can you tell me logically why it is that 95% of all "medicine" actually only treats "symptoms" (alleviate the pain) and not the disease?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Healed by homeopathy of an "incurable" disease
Posted by: heid on Feb 13, 2008 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When homeopathy heals you of an incurable and completely untreatable disease - at least as far as standard medicine is concerned - it turns your head around. That's what happened to me. I saw a homeopathist when approaching death - asked to by a loved one. The first thing I said was, "I think this is utter nonsense." The response was, "I don't care." The homeopathist had the right approach. Belief has nothing to do with its efficacy.

It's years later, and I'm still here, out of pain, with fading vision returned, and failing organs functioning normally. It's resulted in a complete change in how I see reality. Just because we don't know how something works doesn't mean that it doesn't work.

Since then, I've seen my cat cured by homeopathy and other people's conditions cured.

My own illness was caused by the medical profession - and that condition nearly always is. My cat's was caused by a vaccination. With a choice between a medical doctor, with surgeries and pharmaceutical poisons, or a homeopath, I'll take the homeopath nearly every time. If my leg is broken, then I'll see a medical doctor to set the leg - but take homeopathic remedies to see to it that it heals well and quickly.

If the best arguments people can come up with against homeopathy are condescension and ridicule, then there must not be any thinking going on - just reaction. To some degree, I sympathize, as I was once one of those people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article mischaracterizes science - and then misunderstands it
Posted by: Brodog486 on Feb 13, 2008 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is needlessly catty, and just misses the point. Take the following paragraph:

"Conventional biological scientists (then and now) resist healing mechanisms outside their paradigm. Like the man who lost his contact lens down a dark alley, but searched for it under a bright street lamp because that's where he could see, they deny even the possibility that homeopathy could convey healing information via mechanisms they can't measure. Since only material substances (rather than information) have agency, surely homeopathy must be either a fraud or a placebo."

This paragraph makes the article's argument. It suffers from the ad-hominem, Mr. Magoo characterization of science at the beginning, then makes unfounded philosophical assumptions about (puzzlingly!) agency, and scientific method at the end.

As it is clear the author is unaware, a person does not need to appeal to agency in order to dispute the validity of homeopathy. It is a much better strategy to attack the vitalistic foundation of homeopathy on the basis of the scientific method. The argument goes like this: there can be no experiment that would either confirm or disconfirm the fundamental homeopathic hypothesis- "some particular state of a person's vital force is identical to some particular disease" -- which is grounds for rejecting it.

A search for a new theoretical foundation for homeopathic practices could be interesting (and would have made for a better article), but as it stands, I doubt practicing homeopaths understand their own theories.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inform yourselves.....
Posted by: PickleBarrel on Feb 15, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWE1tH93G9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Z1QFZcnAi4

snake oil....is snake oil....is snake oil...

This author is pushing snake oil...homeopathy works just as well as the placebo. homeopathy takes poisons to the body and places it in water, then dilutes it to virtually nothing, saying "this will cure you and if scientists deny it then they are close minded dogmatists". It's all about manipulating you out of your money.

People make a lot of money off the gullible.

A fool and his money are soon parted...

"There's a sucker born every minute"
- P.T. Barnum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's so sad
Posted by: PickleBarrel on Feb 15, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After a certain point...after all reason fails...and even after trying ridicule...and after a while...I just pity you...

The body has an amazing power to heal itself! Doesn't need a lot of medicine, and left to it's own devices, will cure itself of most diseases and injuries. There have been many cases of people who were "destined" to die but miracles! recovered. Most of these people latch onto insert favorite diety here..Praise the insert favorite cure here! Usually it's to the closest connection they can make to the "cause" of the cure.

Maybe...just Maybe...it was just your own body healing itself...Praise be to insert favorite diety here!

If not...I have a bridge in Texas you might be interested in...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's so sad Posted by: particle
Good article
Posted by: enricko123 on Mar 1, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]