Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health & Wellness

Is Prayer Good for Your Health?

By Stan Cox, AlterNet. Posted January 11, 2008.


Welcome to the weird world of medical prayer. What, if anything, does it accomplish?
20080110story
prayer
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As 2007 drew to a close, news media across the country reported on the usual holiday collection of medical miracles -- stories that almost always end with patients and family members giving credit to the healing power of prayer.

One survivor, a Christian heavy-metal vocalist who was struck in the neck in December's notorious Colorado church shootings, is now recovering, say his friends and fans, with the aid of prayer vigils throughout the United States and Europe.

And Christmas week, a 46-year-old Beach City, Ohio, surrogate mother, who had originally been thought to be carrying only one fetus, delivered a set of healthy twins after a difficult pregnancy. Her niece, the egg donor, announced that the double birth was the result of prayers she had secretly offered for months.

Arising partly out of religious belief and partly out of frustration with high-tech medicine, millions of prayers cross the lips of patients, family members, and even doctors and nurses each day in America's hospitals and examining rooms.

That has prompted a post-2000 wave of research aimed at determining what, if anything, all that praying accomplishes: Can it directly improve patients' health? Does it simply soothe? What happens if the patients aren't told they are being prayed for? And what if they do know -- can patients be harmed by prayer? The answers found so far don't seem to be making anyone feel much better.

Say two prayers and call me in the morning

A 1998 Harvard Medical School survey estimated that 35 percent of Americans pray for good health and that 69 percent of those who pray find it "very helpful" -- a bigger percentage than felt their visits to doctors had been very helpful. A much larger study conducted by the National Institutes of Health in 2002 found 43 percent of people in the United States pray for their own health, and 24 percent seek the prayers of others. Most strikingly, 73 percent of critical-care nurses in a 2005 national survey said they use prayer in their work.

Such results are no big surprise. Most Americans are religious believers and can recount for you any number of stories in which prayer appeared to heal. The highly respected Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University has even set up an "intensive prayer unit" to capture whatever benefits it might provide.

For medical prayer to have an effect, no actual divine or supernatural intervention is necessary; belief alone may give a psychological boost to a recovering patient. Any doctor or scientist wishing to lay bare the healing hand of God or the power of "energy medicine" finds that the placebo effect of prayer is much harder to account for than that of pharmaceuticals, which can be dispensed in controlled doses or replaced by sugar pills.

But one type of prayer experiment does attempt to account for the sugar-pill effect and thereby meet the rigorous statistical requirements of scientific journals. In randomized, double-blind studies, the praying is done by people who aren't in contact with the patients, the patients don't know whether they are being prayed for or not (and in some cases don't even know an experiment is going on), and the doctors and researchers don't know who is praying for whom as they go about treating patients and analyzing the data.

It's through such studies that a small cadre of researchers has been trying in recent years to go straight to the source, to determine whether prayers offered from a distance can heal patients' bodies without passing through their minds. Such "distant intercessory prayer" or "distant healing" studies have also become somewhat of a growth industry. Following only three papers published on the subject between 1960 and 1990 and just four during the 1990s, at least 18 new studies have hit the scientific literature since 2000.

Generous federal and private funding has helped fertilize work in this area, but results so far have been underwhelming. The majority of studies show no significant effects, positive or negative. Some actually find prayer harmful. Others have asked more specific questions: whether the benefits of prayer increase with "dosage" (they don't), whether it matters who does the praying (born-again Christians seem to have an edge, says one observer), and even whether prayers can travel back in time (you'll have to wait a bit for the answer to that one.)

The double-blind double-bind

A type of statistical merger -- called a "meta-analysis" -- of 15 distant-prayer studies, led by researchers at Syracuse University and published in 2006-07, was unequivocal in concluding that "there is no scientifically discernible effect for distant intercessory prayer on health," regardless of how often or how long patients were prayed for.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, prayer

Stan Cox is a plant breeder and writer in Salina, Kan. His book Sick Planet: Corporate Food and Medicine will be published by Pluto Press in April.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It couldn't hurt
Posted by: vox persona on Jan 11, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is my Christmas letter published in my local paper (my 89th), I'm usually ultra-political....my 90th piece a few days ago was a commentary on our primary/electoral process. I have shortened it here, and include all apologies to my atheist friends.

When considering the state of life on this planet, it is easy to see that humanity has a long way to go before Christ would be proud of our progress. As it stands now, wars and hostilities run rampant, we are polluting the air we breathe and the water we drink, and racism & religious prejudice still have a very strong foothold in many parts of the world.
When one accepts the concept of an afterlife, or continuous consciousness, it becomes clearer how truly important the Teachings of Christ still are. He wanted us to love one another, love God, taught karma (cause and effect), tolerance and forgiveness, and to serve our brothers and sisters here on Earth.
Jesus knew more about us than we know about ourselves. When He told us 20 centuries ago, "Greater things than I do ye shall also do" (John 14:12) He was expressing the Potential within us that we have yet to realize. Every scientific consensus of the day tells us that we only use 15% of our brain. Think of our untapped potential.
Christ taught that if we have the faith of a grain of mustard seed, we can move mountains (Matthew 17:20). Consider prayer and the real effects it can have in this world. It is a mental exercise, a discipline in focus.
We should take Him up on His Promise and find time each day to clear and focus our mind in prayer; for our families, our friends, our health, expressing thanks, and anything else non-selfish.
Let us all join in prayer for a better world. If nothing else, it couldn't hurt.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It couldn't hurt-- a brief comment Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: It couldn't hurt? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: It couldn't hurt? Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: It couldn't hurt? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: It couldn't hurt? Not after we die. Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: It couldn't hurt Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: It couldn't hurt Posted by: jroth420
» RE: It couldn't hurt? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» I Write to God Once a Year Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: It couldn't hurt Posted by: Bibsi
» Very interesting Posted by: vox persona
» Yes. It can. Posted by: Tatarize
» RE: It couldn't hurt Posted by: Bibsi
the weird world of medieval prayer
Posted by: Richard House on Jan 11, 2008 1:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How presumptuous, selfish, and idiotic it is to pray. The Creator has a plan, so why be arrogant as well when you think you can change His Plan to your stupid little plan?

Besides why do so many Westerners beleive the Christian God is the only game in town? Arrogant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the weird world of medieval prayer Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: the weird world of medieval prayer Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: the weird world of medieval prayer Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: the weird world of medieval prayer Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: the weird world of medieval prayer Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
So, faith-based medicine...
Posted by: seenaymah on Jan 11, 2008 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...doesn't work any better than faith-based sex education.

Quelle surprise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christian prayer is a form of denial
Posted by: Blink on Jan 11, 2008 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Alternet regularly points out, Christianity poses the biggest threat to our freedoms and way of life of any of the major religions. In contrast, Islam and Islamic praying (five times daily while protrate on a prayer rug facing Mecca) is non-threatening. Christians would be well advised to convert to Islam and pray in this fashion. Just imagine if all of the existing Christians in America suddenly converted to Islam and began praying in Muslim fashion and living according to the tenets of Islam! What a better country this would be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Buddhism hasn't started a war... Posted by: ptoddchesser
» RE: Christian prayer is a form of denial Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Smarmy double standard Posted by: defrag
» Tenets of Islam?! Posted by: snideelf
» RE: Tenets of Islam?! Posted by: Bibsi
» RE:RE: Tenets of Islam?! Posted by: snideelf
» RE: Tenets of Islam?! Posted by: Bibsi
» I am not a Muslim, but... Posted by: Blink
Praying for Health
Posted by: Pau on Jan 11, 2008 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder the U.S. comes out last in succesful care of preventable deaths. Too worried about praying and nothing about social medicine. Praying is free, social medicine costs money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Praying for Health Posted by: jillipooh
» RE: Praying for Health Posted by: Bibsi
Ludicrous
Posted by: PROFPETE on Jan 11, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The entire concept is ludicrous. Measuring prayer is nonsense, not because I do not believe in God but because the studies overlooked the most important prayer factor-the reason why Jesus, Honi The Circle Maker, Appolonius of Tyre, Padre Pio and others were successful when others were not, in performing miracles, is the quality of the connection to God of the person doing the praying. Having self-appointed prophets pray is like allowing self-appointed baseball player pray and play in MLB games. They would not even see the pitches. Commercializing prayer, as organized religions do is further nonsense.
However the concept of the Tachyonic efficacy of prayer traveling forth and back via the quantum is MY THEORY of some 45 years and is the route of prophecy and anyone who has read my columns with an open mind has written about my off-the-wall against the grain prophecies which have never failed. Google me and my writing and see for yourself, the dates of the writings and of the occurrences following are clearly visible. God appoints/anoints prophets not churches or medical study groups.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ludicrous Posted by: lkagy
» RE: Ludicrous, ludricous! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Ludicrous Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: Ludicrous Posted by: Bibsi
What a joke
Posted by: cordas on Jan 11, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely if god didn't want people to get ill (s)he could stop it before it ever happens... The idea that praying for someone might heal them and might not depending on ??? is just insulting and childish.

I would actually go a bit further in saying that I actualy find the idea offensive, why didn't god answer the prays said for my uncle who died of brain cancer... he was a loving father and devoutely religious person. Why where other peoples prays answered and not his... Why even bother striking him down with cancer in the 1st place...

All in all its just superstious claptrap like the rest of the religion stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What a joke Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: What a joke Posted by: jroth420
» RE: What a joke Posted by: Vik
» RE: What a joke Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: What a joke Posted by: cordas
» RE: What a joke Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: What a joke Posted by: Bibsi
Dumb comments
Posted by: PJT on Jan 11, 2008 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the comments except that of the 89 year old person are typically narrow minded and plain dumb. Look, we surely can make ourselves sick worring. Why not accept that we might be able to reverse some symptoms by praying... or meditating, or thinking pure thoughts, or warm healing light, or whatever? Why is it selfish (to cite a particularly offensive comment by Fat Man) to pray for oneself? And just because we don't understand something, doesn't mean it might not be true. You all are beginning to sound like a bunch of silly creationists. In a thousand years, if we survive (doubtful at best) they will laugh at our ideas about "science".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dumb comments Posted by: g
» RE: Dumb comments Posted by: jroth420
» Less is more Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Dumb comments Posted by: Bibsi
Prayer or Arrogance?
Posted by: Suzen on Jan 11, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my experience, prayer is a subtle thing. It does not adhere to linear measurement or fit into the expectations of present day concepts of "Healing". The studies done with expectation of certain results will not work at all. Such a study is not about prayer, but about arrogance. Only studies done with true curiosity and open mindedness will work.

Healing prayer takes place on many levels. Sometimes it doesn't appear to do much on the physical, but help can come through lots of other ways - ie. someone gets an idea which helps the patient - feelings settle and suffering is relieved - members of families suddenly break through old patterns and gain understanding as they attend an ill family member - there is a smooth passing with no fear --- anything can happen. To just look at prayer with hands on hips and expectations is to miss the point entirely. As far as I know, the Creator doesn't need to prove itself to us. We need to shut up and observe the whole picture with an eye to seeing something subtle.

I, personally, am really tired of people standing around assuming that if something doesn't fit into their picture of how things should be, it doesn't exist. What ever happened to curiosity and a 'state of wonder'? That is where prayer exists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prayer or Arrogance? IGNORANCE Posted by: scottyrocks
» RE: Prayer or Arrogance? Posted by: factbased
» RE: Prayer or Arrogance? Posted by: Iaela
Spooky action at a distance?
Posted by: ritadona69 on Jan 11, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all walk into rooms every day where we can feel the energy of what's going on even if nobody speaks. When we enter into that space, that energy affects us. I don't see it as that great a leap to think that positive energy deliberately directed towards me would have an impact. We are all energy at our core.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent Balanced Summary
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 11, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stan Cox provides an excellent jumping off point on this article for serious students of this issue.THANKS

Here is my take:

-Biomedical research has been dominated by the excesses of biology for at least the past 100 years despite the reality that all living things, including the human body, are ALSO energy systems. That is not mystical.Rather that is measurable. Biomedicine needs to re-embrace physics as a partner with biology. This could be the big story of biomedicine in the 21st century recognizing that old paradigms die hard- usualy "by funeral".

-Read the works of Drs. Larry Dossey and Gary Schwartz(google them)

-Read the research behind HeartMath technology(google)

The essence of science is open-mindedness but people like Drs. Richard Sloan and Bruce Flamm seemed to have forgotten that.

LIKE MOST SCIENCE THIS STORY IS NOT OVER. And with any luck may never well be.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent Balanced Summary Posted by: jroth420
» RE: xcellent Balanced Summary Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: xcellent Balanced Summary Posted by: drricklippin
wrabbit
Posted by: shd1230 on Jan 11, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, there is no way to tell if prayer makes any difference; second; if it does, then by all means pray. As someone used to say-" It can't hurt--it might help." But believers might also consider how many prayed-for patients died just like everybody else; how many prayers go unanswered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wrabbit Posted by: anchoorite
» RE: wrabbit Posted by: factbased
» RE: wrabbit Posted by: jroth420
» RE: wrabbit Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
don't believe, know
Posted by: solrev on Jan 11, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jesus taught us specifically not to pray like the Jews or Muslims. Jesus taught us a simple little prayer that sums up the Christian belief and how we are supposed to act. Christian prayer has become an over used ritual in most Christian denominations. Jesus even warned us not to let our rituals overcome our faith. Like Jesus said, God knows our needs before we ask. Praying can be viewed as a demonstration of a lack of faith. However, if it makes you feel good do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't believe, know Posted by: counterpoint
» RE: don't believe, know Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: don't believe, know IGNORANCE Posted by: scottyrocks
» RE: don't believe, know IGNORANCE Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: don't believe, know IGNORANCE Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: don't believe, know Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: don't believe, know Posted by: Bibsi
porkchop the common
Posted by: ptoddchesser on Jan 11, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that money would have ever been put towards any studies such as the ones mentioned in this article.
I know opinions are like assholes,everyone has one.This is mine.I'm pretty sure that once man was able to formulate any kind of thought other than,
"What am I going to eat?".
His mind turned to,
"Where the hell did I come from?".
In this, God was created and in turn he created all things.For his simple mind this was the only explanation. I find it odd that today people still cling to this belief of a "God" that nurtures his "children" and cloaks the universe in his infinite wisdom.
The Bible is merely a great story book with some pretty wise lessons for those that want to learn them.But it was written by men.It was packaged by men(who also felt the need to exclude any books that related the equality of women).It was guarded by men who for so long kept it secret and doled it out as they saw fit.
I don't want to step on any toes but I believe religion is for the weak minded.Those people that need just another coping method.It's sad though,that these same people feel the need to spread their "gospel" around the world and offer false hope to those just gullible enough to receive it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» God and deeper thought! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: God and deeper thought! Posted by: ptoddchesser
» RE: porkchop the common Posted by: Bibsi
Really more tolerant?
Posted by: warriornation on Jan 11, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals always claim to be more tolerant than conservatives. I saw a lot of liberal opinions that want to discredit the article. Just because an article came out that is for once not against the existence of God, doesn't mean everybody has to start to discredit prayer. BTW, I'm not a conservative, I'm a populist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eally more tolerant? Posted by: anchoorite
» RE: eally more tolerant? Posted by: warriornation
» RE: eally more tolerant? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: eally more tolerant? Posted by: Bibsi
how it "works": counting the hits, ignoring the misses. Better: give real help & support!
Posted by: counterpoint on Jan 11, 2008 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Counting the hits and ignoring the misses is what it comes down to.
As an atheist who is a member of a unitarian church because of the great community I can tell you what works much better than voodoo/prayer: when church members are sick, are grieving, have big problems, or great joys such as the birth of a child we organize to call the person, send cards, we visit and bring meals, we arrange rides, we talk about issues, etc. It deepens connections, it really helps because we actually do something. "Praying" by itself (especially if it's unannounced) has no effect.
So please: do something perceptible and effective instead (or if you must cling to superstitious modes: in addition).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Shared Concept
Posted by: craigandrew on Jan 11, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our religions have God decide if we live or die,.. evolution has Nature making the decision. Either way, it is not for us to decide who is the most fit for survival.

In a thousand years we will know who was best suited for the environment today. Until then, it is every person for themselves... and you better believe in whatever it is you do 100%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Shared Concept Posted by: Bibsi
why the fundies hate science
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 11, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The purpose of science is to look at the universe rationally and to determine cause and effect. One of the fundamental tenets of science is that things cannot just "come out of nowhere" that there has to be cause and effect.

I recently read a book on the horrors of the witchcraft persecution in 17th century Europe. The author concluded that the revolutionary idea of cause and effect propounded by such scientists as Issac Newton and Rene Descartes was instrumental in ending the mania.

Carl Sagan called science "a candle in the darkness". Thank god we have it.

I have talked to several fundies about the scientific studies of prayer mentioned in the article. They immediately get defensive and almost always fall back on saying: "well, the people in the study didn't BELIEVE enough!" To which I answer: "ok, so how do you measure 'belief'? Show me a way to measure it in statistics and a rational reproduceable manner".

Needless to say, I am not too popular with the fundies in my town.

PS--I am a farmer in Nebraska.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: why the fundies hate science Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: why the fundies hate science Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» used weather Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: used weather Posted by: Xynyx
"I believe"
Posted by: skydog on Jan 11, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, this is no surprise.

As we all struggle to survive under the boot heel of unfettered laissez-faire capitalism, with a for-profit health care industry, a military-industrial-media complex, and an oil industry run amok, all converging to bleed us dry, we're all wound tighter than a clock spring.

Physiologically, reducing stress has positive helath benefits. So any salve to soothe jangled nerves is going to be helpful. Some need chemicals to medicate, some do it on pure imagination alone.

Surrendering one's self to faith removes all burden of having to be face reality as it is. It's a publicly-endorsed escape from rationality. It's comforting to tell one's self that all this impending misery will be but a comma in the book of eternity (to paraphrase an enduring hero of some of faith's most irrational practitioners.)

What pisses me off is the self-righteous who proclaim that supplicating one's self before an invisible patriarch like a slope-foreheaded primitive hominid is acceptable, but smoking a little ganga isn't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "I believe" Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: "I believe" Posted by: skydog
» RE: "I believe" Posted by: Bibsi
» RE: "I believe" Posted by: oldumbo
» RE: "I believe" Posted by: Xynyx
rawebb
Posted by: Roger64 on Jan 11, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a psychologist and decent statistician. I have not reviewed many of the studies of the medical effects of prayer, but did see reports on a couple. What I detected was dependent variable shopping. That is, the researchers collected a lot of outcome variables and then talked about the ones that showed improvement. You expect some variables to change by chance, and those were the ones that got reported. Bad study design. I doubt this area will repay more work than I have invested.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rawebb revisited
Posted by: dkm on Jan 11, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The conclusion that prayer aids by looking at a plethora of relationships and then saying that fewer than 5% of them show positive correlations has been observed in at least one major study that supposedly shows that prayer works. In that study there were numerous correlations between prayer and health response calculated, but only those few that showed a positive correlation were discussed. The vast majority that showed no correlation or a negative correlation were ignored. Given that the measure of statistical significance is 95% certainty that the results are not due to chance, that means that in 100 comparisons that show statistical significance at the P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

placebo effect
Posted by: Forrest on Jan 11, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the immune system. that's why humans invented religion(s) in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: placebo effect Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
The God of Truth!
Posted by: garry minor on Jan 11, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someday soon when people accept the God of Truth, the God that spoke the Word "kaneh bosm", and we use the Tree of Life for food, fuel, shelter, medicine, pleasure, spirituality, and unity will our prayers be answered. The curse will be removed.
Kaneh bosm destroy's tumors, promotes the growth of brain cells, prevents Alzheimers, and is being used to treat MS, autism, epilepsy, migraine, arthritis, diabetes, depression, obesity, chronic pain, nausea, alcoholism, drug addiction, cystic fibrosis, asthma, emphysema, herpes, skin conditions, Parkinsons, Huntingtons, Tourettes, Crohns disease and more. We have no idea all the benefits of this resource because our FDA refuses to allow testing here in the Land of the Free.
Not only that but kaneh bosm can produce all of our paper, plastics, paints, varnishes, textiles, lubricants, fuel, plywood, structural components, insulation, livestock feed, health foods, cosmetics and more, eco friendly. In 1938 we knew of over 25,000 uses for it, who knows what we can do with modern technology. It grows without fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides to foul the soil and water, in soil and conditions most crops won't grow, from the Equator to the Arctic circle. It will create millions of Earth friendly jobs, begin a redistribution of wealth, and create social harmony. It exposes the lie!
Kaneh bosm is cannabis, mistranslated from the original Hebrew as calamus by the Greeks in Exodus 30:23, Song of Songs 4:14, Isaiah 43:24, Jeremiah 6:20, and Ezekiel 27:19.
For those with eyes to see, If you know the Truth the Truth will set you free!
Kanaba, kaneh bosm, cannabis, haoma, hemp, taima, etc...........

Garry Minor
Columbus Cannabis Ministry, Hawaii Cannabis Ministry
Columbus Indiana

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The God of Truth! Posted by: Bibsi
podcast critiquing prayer & religion health studies
Posted by: counterpoint on Jan 11, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for a fairly recent discussion of that subject I'd suggest you listen to a podcast available free via FFRF or search for it on iTunes:
Nothing Fails Like Prayer (5/20/06)
Featuring guest Richard Sloan, Ph.D., author of the book, Blind Faith: Critiquing prayer and religion health studies.
Blind Faith

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I had a headache
Posted by: sausage on Jan 11, 2008 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a headache the other day.

I asked god for it to go away.

I took two aspirins and prayed.

All praise to god, my headache's gone!

There ya go. All you need to know about the power of prayer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I had a headache Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: I had a headache Posted by: Bibsi
God is mysteriously selective...
Posted by: BlueSun on Jan 11, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As has been pointed out on an ingenious website Why Does God Hate Amputees, it seems that no matter how pious they are and how much they and their loved ones pray, god has never seen fit to grant a miracle to an amputee and grow back the missing limb(s). Given that any self-respecting chamelion can grow back its missing tail, would this be too much to ask?

The belief that prayer can have anything more than a placebo effect is entirely without proof. Various statistical studies come out all over the map, but are for the most part entirely inconclusive. No single case of prayer leading to divine healing in medical history has ever been scientifically established. There is, in fact, no way to determine whether any given cancer was cured by treatment, spontaneous remission, or godly intercession.

Since there are no other mechanisms for growing back a missing limb, it is the perfect test case for the value of prayer and divine intercession. And, to date, it has failed every time.

So, either prayer to a divine being can result in miraculous (unnatural, by definition) cure, in which case god must hate amputees, or the people who believe in prayer and miracles are merely deluding themselves.

Here's a little test I've devised for the faithful to test the relative merits of prayer and science. The next time you walk into a dark room, drop to your knees and pray for light instead of reaching for the switch on the wall.

You'll spend a lot of time unnecessarily in the dark (pun intended).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shame on you people
Posted by: onegranolagirl on Jan 11, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This morning when alternet came into my email box my first thought was to as I always do just delete it. I find that more often than not it is cynical, negatively focused, and sarcastic. Which is a shame because I am always looking for an adequate representation of the liberal mindset. I'm PRAYING that this isn't it. I didn't delete this mornings list because I am a science buff, quantum obsessed and know and understand the qualitative potential of the quantum sciences. The power of intention is viable and mindblowing research. So how is prayer different than intention? In many cases it isn't (energetically speaking). This article delivered information in its typical slanted, tongue in cheek, biting way and most of you people responding in typical narrow minded, negative kind. Funny, I don't remember the title of the article being "The power of organized religion". Yet that is where almost every one of your arguments went. Political crap about God and organized religion, which quite frankly don't necessarily have to have anything to do with prayer and the power of setting intentions. No wonder we are at war.No wonder people are starving, no wonder the many ills of the world exist in such a huge way. I'm guessing that many of you spend your time bitching about the state of the world, bitching about the war, and yet look how quickly you were willing to take sides, express negativity, and belittle belief systems that didn't match your own. We are not in the state of affairs that we are in as a country because we have a crappy government we are in it because we as a people have little to no tolerance as illustrated by the many comments following this article and we are too willing to criticize, condemn, and pass the buck. Shame, shame, shame. There is no such thing as "they", we are they. And until we start allowing for miracles, having more tolerance, having compassion and light, nothing will change. Thank you for reminding me to end my membership to this negativity spewing list serve. I'll pray that everyone will start to get a little compassion as I hit the unsubscribe button.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nice. Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: Best comment ever on alternet Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Shame on you people Posted by: dmaciewski
the divine plan
Posted by: anchoorite on Jan 11, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When it comes to prayer, George Carlin has the best take on this whole stupidity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o

min 6:10

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Statistics versus physical cause
Posted by: PaulK on Jan 11, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost all of religion covers mysteries which have no physical cause. However, some events have strong statistical correlations.

The best example of statistical correlation is probably ESP. Certain adepts such as Edgar Cayce could consistently read 100% of a deck of cards. Yes, he gave up playing cards because it was no fun.

People ask, if these guys are so psychic, why don't they just pick winning lottery numbers? Anecdotal evidence suggests that some might be doing this. For example, John Edwardes in Britain needed a healing clinic so he could heal people, so he took out a loan against a future lottery winning. This phenomenon is hard to study because some very wise people don't have quite the respect for moolah that most people have. Nor would devout people want to lead millions of the world's fools into lotteries and casinos.

As for healing, maybe it's just modern U.S. Christianity. U.S. Christians are pretty much not into the stuff that Jesus of Nazareth taught. It's only long distance prayer these days, and at that most Christians only believe in the U.S. medical health care system. By and large U.S. Christians have also got big issues with feeding Lazarus at their gate, and harming hairs on the heads of the little kids that harvested cocoa for their chocolate and who made their screwdrivers found at WalMart, not to mention little Iraqi kids who got cancer breathing depleted uranium smoke particles. Maybe Christianity doesn't work as well if you don't practice parts of it.

Somewhere I have a group photo of about 100 smiling terminal patients at a hospital in China, and I trust that they're all way past their expiration date. Not Christian prayer, but it might be statistically impressive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting. . .
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Jan 11, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking from my own rather broad and colorful religious experience; too often, the resort to prayer is an excuse not to be pro-active or genuinely engaged with others. It also seems like a giant cop out; "I'm too lazy to think or act for myself, so let some invisible imaginary friend do my thinking/acting for me." Sorry, it's crap, and I am living a much happier and healthier life since I gave it up.

We do whatever good we can within the little sphere of our ability; we cannot change the whole world, but we can exert some small influence on the part we can physically touch and interact with.

Instead of referring to a distant, and apparently rather dis-interested and impotent divine being when evil confronts us; we ought to do what is in our real physical power to challenge and confront that evil, rather than struggling with the theological conundrum of "the problem of evil." Evil is, always has been and always will be; "shit happens" either because of natural processes or because of human greed and prejudice; no divine being "lets it happen" or "metes out punishment to the wicked."

There is no guarantee of justice in the world, but we can insure that we ourselves behave justly and ethically with whomever we happen to be dealing. Prayer is a waste of time and energy and a distraction from the genuine work of living an ethical, compassionate, peaceful and just life. It might make those who pray feel good about themselves, but that's about it.

I am a free-thinking agnostic and very unashemedly, a humanist; I am not an atheist or an "anti-theist;" I try to maintain respect for others and their beliefs so long as they don't try to impose their beliefs on me; when all's said and done I do not care what you believe so long as you are a person of good will and recognize that we can agree to disagree on many things.

Please do not waste your time praying for me; go out into the world and make it a better place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting. . . Posted by: dmaciewski
A Tired Debate
Posted by: pcushniesr on Jan 11, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a tired, old debate and can only result in all sides throwing around the same old arguments. But what the hell. Why should I be different?

If the True Believer maintains that his god is omni-everything, then one must conclude that things are the way they are because this god wants them to be that way. After all, would it be possible for an all-powerful agent to be thwarted in the achievement of its desires? I think not. That would render it less than all powerful. Does everything serve God's plan, as so many are wont to say? Then, if this god is all good, and if everything serves its plan (which we must assume to be good) then everything that _is_ must be good. Therefore, there really is no Evil. But can we really talk about an omni-everything entity having wants, desires? These suggest limitations. And if this entity is omniscient and knows THE future, then prayer becomes pointless, given that everything is already set. Can this god change its mind? In effect, probably not, for it would know that it changed its mind even before doing so, which would bring the whole shebang right back to square one. Actually, I think omnieverythingness would be a trap.

But, of course, we are talking about make-believe here, trying to bring the inherently illogical to a logical conclusion, a fool's errand if ever there was one. As was stated in the article, if prayer worked, there could be no science, no valid research. The supernatural is never an answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Choice
Posted by: henderson on Jan 11, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn’t read the whole article, but was raised fundamentalist until I started to think for myself which was after I had children and loved them SO much that I realized that I could NEVER condemn them to a place called “hell”, no matter WHAT they ever did. Then I realized I’d been taught that “God” loves us so much MORE than “human” love, how could there could be such a place as “hell” – this was all about fear and control and asking you to give “them” (organized religion) your money.

Now, at age 67, I believe in reincarnation and that we all CHOOSE, before we’re born, our parents, what we will be born into, and the lessons we need to learn in this lifetime. We are ALL “God” in some form. "God" isn't "up there", wearing a long white beard and hurling lightning bolts. Our “God” is our “higher self”, the “still, small voice”, etc. And yes, we all need to communicate with the spirit that is us and in us, and it helps to meditate and allow it to come through unencumbered by the outer, material world. (As in the song by the Police – “we are spirits, in a material world”.)

Along with this is the belief that death, losing a limb, disease, etc. are horrible, terrible things. They aren’t. They’re only lessons to be learned; by us, and the people around us. Death is only shedding this body like a cocoon and going back “home”. Like opening a door and going into the next room. Like closing one book, and going on to the next one.

I also believe that prayer can’t hurt. And yes, that it can help. But I believe that one of the first laws of this universe is that you can’t choose FOR anyone else. They have their own agenda, between them and their creator, no matter how old they are. So perhaps if they “choose” not to get well, or to lose a limb or to be born with cancer, it’s for their “life lessons”, and it won’t turn out the way WE want it to be.

My inspiration for many things is Sedona, Journal of Emergence – “channeled” voices teaching nothing but love and choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Had you actually read. . . Posted by: Sue Deaunym
» RE: mick3 Posted by: dmaciewski
Prayer is for the ignorant
Posted by: scottyrocks on Jan 11, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prayer, religion, God makes no sense. Anyone that justifies it is either ignorant or just trying to control others.

My children go to a baptist school and they completely understand that their peers that pray for an extraterrestrial invisible imaginary friend are delusional.

I think evolution will eventually weed out people that pray.

Scott

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prayer is for the ignorant Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: Prayer is for the ignorant Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Famous quote
Posted by: Rod on Jan 11, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are 3 kinds of lies
1. Lies
2. Dammed Lies
3. Statistics

Keep this in mind when reading any scientific study on outcomes. And follow the money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ol' time religion
Posted by: willymack on Jan 11, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing brings out the worst in me like the pathetic fools who STILL cling to their silly superstitions regardless of the mountains of FACTUAL EVIDENCE that negate their beliefs. It's not so bad that there are so many stupid people in the world; it's their in-your-face "superiority" and belief that their delusions are unassailable and immutable. You'd think by now that we'd have progressed past the Middle Ages in regards to medicine and science, yet astrology and theistic religion are still attracting the thinking-challenged. It all makes me want to say something crude and vulgar like do something (you fill in the blanks here) in one hand, and pray in the other, and see which one fills up first. There; I feel better, now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prayer, medical or otherwise
Posted by: rewassenich on Jan 11, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For over 2000 years we have been brainwashed about religion, catholic, protestant, jewish, muslim.
Why praying? For What?
People mostly pray to ask for something, seldom to thank. Why ask for something or thank for something. If there is a God, does he/she owe us anything?
The best advise still is: God helps those who help themselves.
Suggestion: On god and religion read Immanuel Kant, also on elightenment - we really need to be enlightened! About ourselves, freedom, personal and otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

prayer is not a crime
Posted by: vasumurti on Jan 11, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All religions teach that God’s names are holy and meant to be glorified. The Bible contains numerous references to glorifying God and His holy name. (Exodus 15:3; Deuteronomy 32:2-3; I Chronicles 16:8-36; Psalms 29:2, 47:1, 86:11, 91:14, 96:1-3, 97:12, 98:4-6, 113:3, 116:1-17, 146:1, 148:1-5, 13)

"O give thanks unto the Lord; call upon His name; make known His deeds among the people. Sing unto Him, sing psalms unto Him: talk ye of all His wondrous works. Glory ye in His holy name." (Psalms 105:1-4) "...Praise Him with the timbrel and the dance; praise Him upon the loud cymbals." (Psalms 150:4-5)

Israel Baal Shem Tov (1699-1761), the great Jewish mystic, founded Hasidism, a popular pietist movement within Judaism, in which members dance and chant in glorification of God. The Hasidism were especially influenced by verses in Psalms calling for the joyful worship of the Lord through song. (Psalms 100:1,2, 104:33)

According to The Jewish Almanac: "In the Jewish tradition the name actually partakes of the essence of God. Thus, knowledge of the name is a vehicle to God, a conveyor of divine energy, an interface between the Infinite and the finite...It is curious that a tradition that places such a strong emphasis on the one God possesses such a large number of names for the divine. Each name, however, actually represents a different quality or aspect of God."

When teaching his disciples how to pray, Jesus glorified God’s holy name: "Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be Thy name." (Matthew 6:9) Jesus approved of his disciples’ singing joyfully in praise of God. (Luke 19:36-40) Of his own name, Jesus said: "For where two or three are gathered together in my name, I am there with them." (Matthew 18:20)

Paul told the gentiles to speak to one another in psalms and hymns, to sing heartily and make music to the Lord. (Ephesians 5:19) He taught them to instruct and admonish one another with psalms, hymns and spiritual songs. (Colossians 3:16) "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." (Romans 10:13)

According to Eusebius, there was "one common consent in chanting forth the praises of God," in the early Christian churches. In addition to praising the Lord’s name and glories through music, song, and dance, there has also emerged the practice of meditating upon God by chanting upon beads of prayer. St. John Chrysostom recommended the "prayerful invocation of the name of God," which he said should be "uninterrupted."

The repetition of the Jesus prayer ("Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me") became a regular practice among members of the Eastern Church. In The Way of a Pilgrim, a Russian monk writes: "The continuous interior prayer of Jesus is a constant, uninterrupted calling upon the divine name of Jesus with the lips, in the spirit, in the heart..."

In Islam, the names of God are held sacred and meditated upon. According to tradition, there are 99 names of Allah, found inscribed upon monuments such as the Taj Mahal and on the walls of mosques. These names are chanted on an Islamic rosary, which consists of three sets of 33 beads.

The Sikhs call God "Nama," or "the Name." Guru Nanak, the founder of the Sikh religion, prayed, "In the ambrosial hours of the morn I meditate on the grace of the true Name," and says that he was instructed by God in a vision to "Go and repeat My Name, and cause others to do likewise."

Rosaries are used in Buddhism. Members of Japan’s largest Buddhist order, the Pure Land sect, practice repetition of the name of the compassionate Buddha ("namu amida butsu"). Founder, Shinran Shonin says, "The virtue of the Holy Name, the gift of him that is enlightened, is spread throughout the world." Through the name of Buddha a worshipper is liberated from repeated birth and death and joins the Buddha in the "Pure Land."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: prayer is not a crime Posted by: factbased
" You are very small, and life goes on within and without you.."
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jan 11, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prayer if done correctly and sincerely is a form of meditation..

Also it takes you outside of yourself and thus reduces stress all of this is good for the individual..

We are hard wired to have some sense of the spiritual and or mystical or even cosmological..

For some of us the lucky ones all this rolls into one sense of the splendor and vastness and yet connection of everything and transcends and interweaves with any given religion..

The cells in our brains correspond with the billions of stars in the heavens..we are stardust and energy made material...it's all so cool..vast..mystical..

I pity anyone here who has no sense of the mystical or cosmological or epistemological in their life and being..

"Just remember we are very small and life goes on within and without you.."

George Harrison..

He's here with me right now..

See epistemology..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

supernatural or psychological?
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Jan 11, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always wondered if the "positive healing effects of prayer" might be attributable to the patient knowing that there is someone out there who cares enough to pray for them. Feeling that one is supported by a social network could raise a person's spirits and make them more optimistic about their situation. And optimism has been shown to have an effect on one's health.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Problem With the Alcoholism Study...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Jan 11, 2008 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will largely recuse myself from this mostly extremely boring & predictable thread (a shame, too, cause the article actually raises some fascinating questions). I will try to abstain from bickering with the Atheist Set ("We Will Not Tolerate Intolerance"). I'm too busy bickering with the Electable Set ("We Won't Vote for Someone Who Won't Get Enough Votes") today.

Instead, I wish to address the study on alcoholics & prayer cited in the article. The study was meant to "prove" that prayer had an effect on people who were aware of those prayers. Honestly, I'd be hard pressed to think of a worse group to test such a non-objective theory on.

Did the researchers intend to find a negative effect from prayer in this study? Because, by nature of the disease in question, & the test subjects, they were virtually guaranteed to find just that.

Anyone who has struggled with alcoholism (like me) can tell you that, after a certain point, a major psychological factor in continued addiction is GUILT. Having reached a given level of self-disgust & degradation, the alcoholic sees (at least partially) the negative impact of their behavior & becomes consumed with guilty feelings. This often results in attempts to stop or control their drinking, which usually fail. With each failure, the feelings of guilt intensify, eventually becoming a primary engine for continued drinking.

Either the researchers had no understanding of the well-known dynamics of alcoholism, or they chose that group as the subject of their test because they wanted to skew the study to find evidence of a "negative" prayer effect. Of course many of the subjects who knew they were being prayed for were drinking more heavily 6 months later. Not only had they failed themselves, but they'd failed their loved ones (via an official medical study, no less), & ultimately failed/been "condemned" by God! Gee, I think I'd still be drinking (if not dead) under such circumstances, myself.

By way of analogy, if this test had been done on cancer patients, the results would be similar if the researchers had injected those patients with extra cancer cells & then recorded the resulting increase in deaths as "proof" of the harmful effects of prayer.

Really, not only a markedly suspect study (even in comparison to some of the goofier ones listed), but morally highly questionable, given that alcoholism is a disease unique in it's mysterious component of "free will" (which is then influenced by guilt). I must wonder how many people died at least partly as a result of this cynical meddling?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

prayer
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Jan 11, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm gonna pray to my drumset that it give me a billion dollars. I know it(the drumset)is real,so I would say there is more chance of the billion dollars than praying to something that no one can prove exists. Burying your head deeper in the sand just makes it that much harder to breath folks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: prayer Posted by: bitsfick
» RE: prayer Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: prayer Posted by: carbon-based
praying is begging
Posted by: Flavious on Jan 11, 2008 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can only hope people will get up off their knees and stop begging their particular fictional god to cure the injury or illness god supposedly inflicted upon them in the first place. I can only hope humanity will get up off its knees and stop begging god to make the world a better place. People have to take responsibility for their own actions. Jesus was a fictional character today like Zeus was then. Religion and war are two sides of the same coin. As soon as a child is taught god exists, that child has learned to doubt their self.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: praying is begging Posted by: Richard House
just a comment on cannabis
Posted by: warriornation on Jan 11, 2008 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
while many right wingers claim that cannabis is bad or whatever, I found that cannabis makes me even more spiritual. =)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: just a comment on cannabis Posted by: MobileSucks
Bizby
Posted by: Bizby on Jan 11, 2008 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May I suggest, for everyone's consideration, this video on the effectiveness of prayer:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BH0rFZIqo8A

If there is a counter argument to the argument in the video, I'd like to hear it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ive seen studies that go either way
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jan 11, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it mostly depends on the standpoint of the person being prayed for....(somewhat like a placebo)
some people do worse because they thought they weren't bad off enough to warrent prayer and feel that because they are apparently in need of prayer interpret their situation as worse...others do better with prayer because they feel (at least) that others care about them...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From looking at the picture accompanying this report,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 11, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd infer that prayer circles are popular activities in San Francisco or Provincetown, Mass. Of course, I have been to both places and I don't remember seeing this activity or these guys in either place. What could they be doing? LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pray for Universal Health Care
Posted by: kenn on Jan 11, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it would be more efficient if all these prayer groups prayed for Universal Health Care. Or at least pray for the children and approve SCHIP. Right now they are praying for those folks already privledged enough, to have insurance or wealth for access to medical services.

Millions of others, including children would consider THAT a miracle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Q: Is prayer good for your health? A: No.
Posted by: MobileSucks on Jan 11, 2008 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try "insight meditation" instead. And sex is great too. You'll forget about your imaginary friend "God" before you know it. Also, quit going to church. Use your time better because you'll be dead soon and there is no after life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Power of Positive Thinking
Posted by: davesilvan on Jan 11, 2008 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anything, I attribute any good benefits from prayer to the power of positive thinking. Studies have shown that if you truly believe something, you are positive that it's working. It's positive reinforcement to think that your prayers will be answered. It's the way the human mind works.

(for example, I lost 80% of my hearing from ototoxic drugs given to me when I was in the hospital in '02 over six months. When I moved home we had to get hooked up with comcast internet service because I could no longer use a phone; of course I researched ototoxic drugs, that's how I'd even learned the term 'ototoxic,' and saw somewhere that I may slowly regain my hearing over time [I also refused to take any more medications when I learned that pills you take could very well reduce/remove ones hearing] and I would swear that I thought my hearing was getting better, but when I went to an audiologist and got my hearing tested again, it was the same as it was a year before, and the audiologist said she'd never heard of anyone who regained their hearing.)

After all, how many people have seen jebus' image on toast, in water drainage under overpasses, etc. But there is no god, so get over it. Going back in homo sapien history, possibly the very first homo sapien perhaps hid in his cave while lightning flashed and thunder boomed, perhaps thinking he was being punished for the animal he just killed and ate; perhaps he thought he was being punished for forcing sex on a female counterpart. So he blamed it on a higher being, explaining what couldn't be explained. And thus, religion was born.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

prayer circles
Posted by: MobileSucks on Jan 11, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're feeling the Holy Spirit, and each other.

What some of them might not realize is that those special feelings they get when they are standing there, embracing one another so gently, praying so intently and passionately in that prayer circle together -is that it ain't the "Holy Spirit" they feel inside them.

Heh, one day they'll become confused by these feelings. Maybe they will be led astray by Satan and "worldly temptations", perhaps finding themselves taking "wide stances" at urinals in men's restrooms, like good Christians before them such as Senator Larry Craig. But then, thank God, they will see the error of their ways, perhaps with the help of their church and family and friends. Then they will immediately go to a Christian center that will "cure" them of their wickedness, where they will enjoy taking part in more prayer circles, and once again will feel the Holy Spirit and God's grace in their lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: prayer circles Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: prayer circles Posted by: GPFrank
moxey
Posted by: moxey on Jan 11, 2008 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a certified leftist (and non-Christian) of 40 years, I know for a fact that energy medicine is real -- I am a very successful practitioner as well as a recipient. Energy medicine has often helped when traditional medicine did not. And I too will pray for Universal Health Care and and end to the religious (and non-religious) right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Adverse effect of prayer
Posted by: GPFrank on Jan 11, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having gone through some ordeals connected with medical procedures I feel what helped me get through them and accept them is intense concentration. Because of liver problems I have had to forgo anesthesia. But the time that concentration counted the most was being on the respirator after 8 hours open chest surgery.
I was told that as soon as I breathed on my own, they could get the chest tube out, their goal was in 24 hours. I had to think to take every breath I took. Fortunately, because I stayed awake remembering to breathe the tube came out in 18 hours. It is my feeling that any sort of prayer that verbalized any object would have been a distraction from that one main object, of breathing, surviving this ordeal I may have been recalling Biblical sayings but they ran through my head, not by intention.
Another situation in which I think prayer is a distraction: even for a minute, or even for a minute of silence is the classroom. Those who are in the classroom; the teacher and the students have one job and duty and that is to think about what is on the agenda to try to learn, but most of all to think. But prayer is about not thinking, not about one's responsibility, but about shifting responsibility to another agent. It is a form of passing the buck put in somewhat arcane terms. Because in the idea of "to whom" it is being addressed there is nothing more arcane than that in any cognitive sense. And the arcaneness in itself is part of the distraction because that is how it has been taught in the religion.
It is my feeling that when there are "invocations" and the like in parochial and
"denominational" schools, the best students in performance manage to "pass over" the ritual as
a duty to the institution rather than try to grasp meaning of the ritual, when teaching and lecture are to follow. That at least has been my observation of people under such circumstances.
Again, in regard to visiting a patient, I feel if visiting somebody desperately or violently ill the only thing that may help is concentrating on the patient, which his or her appearance appropriately calls for.
Turning down or turning around with some kind of mumbling if it were me in the bed, I would say, "Get out of here!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Will Never Either Prove or Disprove The Effectiveness of Prayer
Posted by: sofla100 on Jan 11, 2008 6:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with these studies is that they break down trying to find an "objective reality" that does not exist. First of all, it is quite possible prayer does work in that psychosomatic cures are well known in medicine. 25% of the time, you could give a depressive sugar pills and if they thought these pills were medicine, they would improve anyway. As for praying from a distance, it will always seem to work if the person "being prayed for" has faith and belief in this type of thing. However, to say conclusively that prayer either work or does not work is putting the cart before the horse. Different belief systems, different subjective realities, different diseases and conditions, it's a non-objectably findable situation. No matter how much you try to prove prayer does not work, it will still seem to work sometimes. And, no matter how much you try to prove prayer does work, it will still not work at all sometimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cfluz7
Posted by: cfuz7 on Jan 11, 2008 7:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Praying always seemed like begging to me" Steve Earl

Never understood it, wish on a star at times, feel the surge of the cosmos and give a "thanks very much cosmos" in my head. Calling up a friend or family member and chatting them up, or just being there doing "practical majik" like cleaning up a bit, making a meal, putting some good tunes, or a cool flick on the entertainment system, providing a good read or just hanging out (or not, many need solitude in healing)works as well as anything a layman can do. I am amazed at humans in the health care field, I couldn't stick needles in people or deal with any of it. I'm proud of them and I have never prayed except maybe in an almost car accident, in extreme physical pain (like child birth) and that "prayer" was strewn with "blasphemy" (grin).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prayer, Addiction and Sobriety
Posted by: GPFrank on Jan 11, 2008 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Originally posted as Answer to "The problem with Alcoholism "

The dynamics of Alcoholics Anonymous: The alcoholic is in the grip of a disease that has a grip on his/her soul (To put in the vernacular)
I speak of the soul as mentioned in the Talmud:
"The breathing, coursing of the blood and emotions".
But there is no known cure for alcoholism; it is
in the class of nervous system illness as addictions. But AA helps the person keep sober.
The person has to acknowledge that the disease has a grip on her/him as a "higher power". So that higher power has to be replaced by a power higher than that, through the series of twelve steps thereby keeping on going to meetings. With addiction there is a paradox. The addict thinks he or she is concentrating staying sober but actually is thinking about the drink. So that thinking about the higher power takes the mind off the drink (or the drug or nicotine)
(I am not alcoholic but I had alcoholism in the family so spent two years in "Alanon" because
that person's alcoholism also is a "higher power") When the addict stays sober the addict is said to be in a state of recovery or "recovering".

That is the reality of chronic illness: and the
question, "How do we put up with it" Especially when taking care of someone with ailments such as dementia: the caretaker is also sick and cries out for help. Where to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if mohammad won't go to the mountain ...
Posted by: cold2touch on Jan 11, 2008 9:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
prayer has no effect on disease, but there is a definite dose effect of disease on prayer.

I am sure joint Baptist-NIH funds are awaiting the well crafted grant proposals to study the matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I was prayed for...
Posted by: toughyt on Jan 11, 2008 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was asked to participate in one of these experiments during my second open-heart surgery. I was not prayed for by Christians, I was prayed for by Buddhists-- although the study did include both faiths as possibilities. Perhaps that fact will make the study more palatable for those out there who are offended by Christianity.

I can assure you, there was no positive effect and I felt more depressed in the hospital than during my first surgery, when I was not prayed for. In my opinion, as a patient, prayer (in whatever form) can be very effective because it will impart on the patient a sense of being cared about by somebody. And for the person praying, they will gain sympathy for the patient by spending time thinking about them. The mind-body connection of being cared about and healing seems self-evident, although that may be presumptuous on my part.

However, this is contradicted by the idea of long-distance prayer. I feel that the author of this article is suggesting that the researchers consider prayer an actual wish list to god. This should be clarified. Instead, if prayer is defined as a meditation on the nature of being that can instill a profound sense of calm, it would make sense that it could be beneficial for the patient. To follow this reasoning through to the end, if that sense of well-being can be imparted by the 'prayer' onto the patient by interacting with them then the stresses on the body are lessened, despite the physical trauma of the surgery.

The big business of medical care and general indifference to the emotional needs of patients cannot be overcome by equally absent emotional care such as long-distance prayer. The idea of pray as an agent of healing does not seem as far fetched when friends or family are intimately involved in the process with the patient in need.

toughyt-- 35 F

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Had you actually read. . .
Posted by: Sue Deaunym on Jan 12, 2008 2:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the whole article, you would have known better than to state:

"I also believe that prayer can’t hurt."

But, stay blissful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My take on the issue. . .
Posted by: Sue Deaunym on Jan 12, 2008 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hope is a necessary but not sufficient ingredient of healing of certain ailments. (In other words, hope alone accomplishes little, but without hope, healing is unlikely.)

Hope can diminish motivation, compel irresponsibility, increase inertia, and lead to languor. (Which is to say, hope can impair healing in some circumstances with some people.)

Prayer can sensitize or desensitize the prayor. It can increase alertness, or it can numb the senses.

I conclude: Prayer can increase hope, which can sometimes enhance healing, but sometimes can hinder it.

I'll never pray for healing. I may use meditation, intellectualization, support and comfort from loved ones, even some kaneh bosm to deal with suffering, but never prayer. If my caregivers need prayer to better attend to my needs, they are welcome to pray all they want. If their prayer makes them more passive or numb to my suffering, I'll thank them to stop it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jim
Posted by: Caesar77 on Jan 12, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If prayer doesn't work, how do you explain the cures at Lourdes.? Medical science can't explain them, but they happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Jan 12, 2008 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how stupid can you get ?? People never prayed as much as during the Dark Age, and there were much more people who died of diseases.

I respect tolerant live and let live religious persons, but i spit on the rest of you, zealots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lourdes
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Jan 12, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what miracle cures ?? I watched a documentary on Lourdes and the guy in charge said there were no more than a dozen miracles, MILLIONS of people visit that place, so its very very near 0%.

Its ok if you need to believe in God and Santa, but dont try convince to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the good news
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Jan 12, 2008 2:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yeah the good news is that you're among the last generations of humans to believe in such stupidities, the Atheists and other non believers are winning, you hear me ?

WE ARE WINNING AND WE WILL BURY YOUR GOD(S), DEITIES AND OTHER SUPERNATURAL ENTITIES so that humanity can leave in peace without priests nor mollah nor sacrifices nor anything.

And while I'm at it, Jesus who I'm certain was a good man, would be ashamed to see what you've done of his faith and word. And this applies to all the religions; Shame on you. But your world is coming to an end, the darkness of religion, faith and intolerance is making way for the light of Science, comprehension and tolerance.

But no we cant tolerate the intolerants so yeah it doesnt apply to the zealots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The moral of the story
Posted by: setterwoman on Jan 13, 2008 11:48 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that if you pray for someone, don't tell them that you are. If you are praying for the Iraqi's who've lost loved ones, who've lost limbs, or for the veterans who've lost limbs or are suffering from PTSD just don't tell them that you are.

Better to do something to stop the war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truest claim humans can make RE: god
Posted by: yantacaw on Jan 14, 2008 11:50 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something Unknown Is Doing We Don't Know What

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prayer is not something that can be studied.
Posted by: eric555 on Jan 15, 2008 3:44 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As if the God of Israel would perform like a trained dog!

More often then not prayer is the last thing we do. After we have been to all the doctors and specialist we can find, After we have exhusted man's ability to help us, then we turn to God.

And he should listen to us? Ha!

We also tend to look at an unwanted result as unanswered prayer. There was an answer, just not the one we were looking for. Many of us pray as if God is supposed to bend to our will. It is the other way around people.

"Thy will, not mine be done."

When my Father was sick three years ago and needed a heart transplant I imagine a lot of people were praying for him. I know I was. I couldn't bring myself to pray that he get the transplant. Let's face it that means someone else had to die.

Instead I prayed that he would be as comfortable as the doctors could make him and that if it was not in Gods plan for my Father to get the transplant, then I asked that he not be forced to hang on an longer then necessary, just let it be done. In the end I was willing to accept Gods will, which is really all we can do.

The Old Man got the transplant and he is still here with us today. The extra time with him is priceless.

Is it because of prayer, I would say no. I certainly do not think my prayer is better then that of anyone else. I say it is because that is what God had in mind all along. Prayer is not a wish list or a Dear Santa letter. It is a private communication between you and your God. It is meant to deepen your relationship. Is is as much about listening as it is about talking.

Your creator already knows what you need and will provide it. Instead of coming to him with a shopping list we should instead be using it the time to learn what he would have from us.

Matthew 6:25  ¶Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
26  Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
27  Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature?
28  And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
29  And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
30  Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
31  Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
32  (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
33  But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
34  Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

in a single word... Yes...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jan 16, 2008 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's amazing what a little faith can do to and for the human body and psyche...

Just think of it as a placebo effect if the atheists wont let go of the the "God/Gods delusional aspect...

personally I find great comfort in believing in something greater than mankind...

we are after all, what we think we are...
we aspire to live, to dream...
to become more...
all for the future...

Is the stairway to heaven actually a strand of DNA?... or maybe its your children's, children's children, a hundred times over?

its amazing... apposable thumbs and a mind to ponder the reasons why!

amazing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For those of you...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jan 18, 2008 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that believe your invisible friend will answer your "prayers," why don't you just talk to Him but not go to a doctor at all?

While you are at it, why don't you ask Him why He made you so sick in the first place? Or why you have a fatal disease, but the loser next door is all healthy and stuff.

As the article states SCIENCE has put to rest once and for all the silliness of prayer.

By the way, why do we not hear about all the praying the Shrub used to do anymore? Did he stop? Did God stop answering? Did God give bad advice? Or is He playing a mean joke (on all of us)? I believe any thinking person knows the answer to that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]