Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Legal Toxins in Toys May Disrupt Male Sexual Development

By Mark Schapiro, The Nation. Posted October 26, 2007.


Toxic chemicals in toys can interrupt the production of testosterone, the hormone that helps determine everything from gender-based behavior to sex drive to sperm count.
Advertisement

This article is adapted from Mark Schapiro's new book Exposed: The Toxic Chemistry of Everyday Products and What's at Stake for American Power (Chelsea Green).

Into the playrooms of children has come the unsettling news: those little red trains and other neat miniatures of the adult world may be coated in paint containing illegally high levels of lead, posing myriad risks to a child's neurological development. After that discovery prompted a mass recall this past summer, parents will never look at Thomas the Tank Engine the same way again. But the uproar over banned substances and rogue Chinese toy manufacturers has overshadowed an even more troubling issue: the toxins in toys that are perfectly legal. The United States remains one of the few developed countries to permit the import of plastic toys made with polyvinyl chloride additives called phthalates (pronounced tha-lates), which help make toys soft and pliable enough to be twisted or sucked yet durable enough to survive a 1-year-old's grip. A mounting body of scientific evidence suggests that phthalates impede the production of testosterone and disrupt the sexual development of infant boys.

That disturbing claim certainly caught my attention as I sat in a hearing room in the California Capitol January 10, 2006, and watched two of America's leading experts on the physiological effects of chemical exposure testify before the health committee of the State Assembly. Such hearings are normally dry affairs, but the scientists' allegations that children were gnawing and sucking on toy animals and other doodads that decrease production of the male sexual hormone gave the testimony a certain urgency. The experts had been called in by Democratic Assemblywoman Wilma Chan, author of a bill to ban phthalates from children's toys; the bill had been met by powerful opposition from the toy and plastics industries.

In the average home, phthalates are everywhere -- in shower curtains, shampoo bottles, raincoats and perfumes (to aid adherence to the skin). In hospitals, they're in medical tubing. A component of that distinct "new car smell" comes from phthalates in the plastic dashboard. The dash becomes more brittle as the car ages because phthalates are slowly migrating into the car's interior. As they sweat out of the plastic, residue enters the air or, through direct contact, the skin.

For infants, the most vulnerable population, exposure takes multiple routes: phthalates enter the womb through the umbilical cord or later through mother's breast milk. Exposure can come from dust in the air, from plasticized wall coverings or flooring and from decaying resins in plastic containers. It can also come from sucking on plastic toys. Plastic rubber duckies floating in many American bathtubs are squishy because of phthalates. Infants, according to the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety, an affiliate of the World Health Organization, have far less capacity for detoxifying chemicals than do adults, and with toys they face all three points of a "risk triangle": "increased vulnerability" to a chemical's "toxic effects" and plenty of possibilities for exposure through "intimate contact."

Chan's bill also proposed a toy ban on Bisphenol A, but most of the scientists' attention that day was focused on a phthalate called Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate, or DEHP, which when ingested can impede the production of LH, a hormone responsible for triggering cells in the testes to produce testosterone. In a baby boy, testosterone plays a major role in determining everything from gender-based behavior to sex drive to what his sperm count will be twenty years later.

Dr. Earl Gray, who has been studying the effect of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on rodents for seventeen years at the EPA's research facility in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, told the panel that sexual malformations may follow from below-normal LH and testosterone levels. Dr. Gray has found that rats fed phthalates during pregnancy gave birth to a high rate of male pups with incompletely descended testes and a rare condition known as hypospadias -- an opening in the penis elsewhere than on the tip. Both are symptoms of low testosterone. Scientists, Dr. Gray said, were calling these deformities "phthalate syndrome," and they are increasingly concerned about a parallel syndrome in human infants. Declining sperm counts among U.S. men and the rising incidence of conditions like hypospadias and testes cancer, Dr. Gray explained, are the possible outcome of early phthalate exposure. "The research," he said, "suggests more and more concern about phthalates."

Also testifying that day was Dr. Shanna Swan, director of the Center for Reproductive Epidemiology at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, in New York. Dr. Swan conducted a study, published in the June 2005 Environmental Health Perspectives, that sent shock waves through the medical community. Swan took urine samples from 134 pregnant women in Los Angeles, Minneapolis and Columbia, Missouri, and tested them for phthalates. The results showed an apparent correlation between women who had higher phthalate levels in their urine and the fact that their male children, within thirteen months of birth, showed "reduced ano-genital distance (AGD)." That measurement of the distance between the anus and the scrotum is a means of distinguishing between male and female rodents and is a key indicator of testosterone levels. Dr. Gray has been seeing shorter AGDs in rats fed phthalates -- now Dr. Swan was seeing it in humans.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: european union, consumer rights, chemicals, epa, phthalates, toys, toxin

Mark Schapiro is the editorial director of the Center for Investigative Reporting in San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
shhh
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Oct 30, 2007 2:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a feminist conspiracy....don't out them or they will ATTACK!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We'll attack anyway Posted by: Beck
» RE: We'll attack anyway Posted by: Eat Politicians
» RE: shhh Posted by: schetikos
What is WRONG with US??????
Posted by: odcherenow on Oct 30, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are in the belly of the Capitalist Beast!!!
How did we get to this "captured consumer" place?
The US is a stupid place to live these days. I am ashamed of US.
Stand up and make your voice heard.
And, may I say, the fact that this affects boys will definitely grease the skids for discontinuance. Alas, negative discrimination lives for females here, babies or babes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Funny.. I was just thinking... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: What is WRONG with US?????? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: What is WRONG with US?????? Posted by: schetikos
Conspiracy of Stupidity
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Oct 30, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if there was no lead or phalates in the toys made in China, it is still insanely stupid to buy them. Exactly what message does it send to a child? "Here ya go sweetie, this is for you. It is a symbol of how I'm so selfish and narrowminded that I don't even think about your future. Just take this toy and pretend to have fun until I can ship you away to one of them government controlled learning centers that teaches you how to think like a slave. And here, while we're at it why dont you roll up your sleeve so you can take this vaccine loaded with mercury. Don't worry, I am trusting and naive, and so I'll just 'believe' that you won't be one of the 1 in 75 that becomes autistic. (Or is it up to 1 in 60 this year?) Bah, who cares, what will be will be. Too much thinking make my brain hurt. It's time to watch some football!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shocked, shocked I tell you
Posted by: allevin on Oct 30, 2007 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, is there any way that we can be sure that all Republican and Right-Wing Nut parents get these toys for free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shocked, shocked I tell you Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Shocked, shocked I tell you Posted by: schetikos
rodnox
Posted by: RODNOX on Oct 30, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AGAIN MONEY TRUMPS MORALS AND COMMON SENSE---WELCOME TO AMERICA-------LAND OF STUPIDITY WHERE JOBS MEAN MORE THAN HEALTH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rodnox Posted by: Turkiye
NO WONDER NOTHING GETS DONE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 30, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything gets turned into a male/female or Dem/Repub fight. This junk is no good for anybody. Plastic is a conven-
ience. Beyond that it creats tons of garbage that won't go away and probably contributes to health problems that we aren't even aware of yet. Babies begin life surrounded by plastic and most everything that goes in their mouths is more plastic. I'm aware of markets and profits, etc. but we should find out how high a price we pay for convenience. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Toxic threat to Male Libido????
Posted by: tkwilson on Oct 30, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where the hell did that come from? The person responsible for such a "loaded" heading on this Alternet article needs to do some serious self searching. This is not about men or their libidos (sexual drive). It has nothing to do with sex AT ALL.
It has to do with the corporatocracys wanton diregard for the health of its meal ticket. It considers all of us disposable as long as we can drag our chemically mangled and diseased bodies into semi adulthood long enough to buy and consume their products.
Ignorant attitudes such as the one responsible for the heading continue to make this kind of corporatist conduct not only possible, but inevitable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's the point of taking DEHP out of toys when it is in our food?
Posted by: Rune on Oct 30, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The trend toward protecting children from DEHP by taking it out of their toys while leaving it in their food (and that of pregnant mothers) is very wrong headed. According to the U.S. EPA:

"The most probable route of exposure to DEHP is through food, with an average contribution of DEHP from food of 0.25 milligrams per day (mg/d). DEHP migrates into food from plastics during processing and storage."

DEHP is also in medical devices, such as the bags and hoses used to provide blood transfusions. So, what good does it do to remove this toxin from toys when the main exposure routes, through food, blood, and drugs packed in the stuff, remains unchecked?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hemp!!!
Posted by: garry minor on Oct 30, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Synthetic plastics were developed using cellulose technology.
Cellulose plastics could be chopped up and used as fertilizer. Hemp is the most efficient plant source for paper, plastics, paints, varnishes, insulations, textiles, lubricants, pressed board products, structural components, and more. In 1938 Popular Mechanics wrote that hemp would be the first billion dollar crop and that over 25,000 products could be made with it! One acre of hemp equals four of timber for pulp and you harvest it every year, tree's take a lifetime. Hemp is ten times as efficient as corn for ethanol production. Henry Ford built and fueled a car with hemp, the cellulose plastic panels ten times stronger than steel. Neither he or Diesel intended to run their engines with petroleum. Canvas is Dutch for cannabis. For thousands of years all ships sails and most clothing were of hemp fiber which is the longest and strongest in nature. The hemp seed is the most nutritious thing you can eat, our Government stockpiles it as a strategic food source under executive order #12919, yet it remains denied to us today!
You and I have cannabinoid receptors in our body. All mammals, birds, and reptiles do. That is why cannabis cannot kill you! In fact it is good for you. Reliable research in Canada and Europe have proven cannabis promotes the growth of brain cells, destroy's tumors, and is helpful with many medical conditions. You could write a book on the wonders provided by this one single plant. In fact there have already been many written.
Hemp industrialization is the key to our future. The reason cannabis is illegal is because billionaires want to remain billionaires.
Food, fuel, shelter, medicine, pleasure, spirituality, unity!
The Tree of life, Kanaba, kaneh bosm, cannabis, haoma, hemp, etc. etc!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hemp!!! Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Hemp!!! Posted by: masterjc
» RE: Hemp!!! Posted by: schetikos
Priorities or decision making processes?
Posted by: TheLimit on Oct 30, 2007 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting that the motivating factor in Europe is science and intelligent analysis of the available facts, and in the US it is emotion. Get those 17 year olds out there threatening not to support your campaign next year! Those kids know their stuff, and you need their support!

Evidently there is something wrong with my thinking processes, but I have trouble getting my brain around the fact that 17 year olds conceivably have more influence on government than objective scientists.

I'd have thought that the scientists would have been a better source of information, but apparently my thinking is wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right wingers...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Nov 2, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...hate sex so they must love these toys.
So Matthews and Russert go around smelling man meat and hatting the idea of Hilary as president Right wingers ar creating homos(sorry to the honest gays) it's these phonies that bother me. They hate gays and at the same time they use their gay hate agenda to vilify gays and everyone else who is not in line with their gay hate agenda and at the same time are gays themselves.

Wow, right wingers talk about gays being confused people; as usual it's the right wingers who are so totally confused.

The right winger evangelical fundies insist that homosexuality is a choice and if gays would just make 'the right choice' everything would fall into place and become so easily 'the right way'.

So I am given to wonder what they think about these toys and the chemicals they contain which could easily be the reason why little boys become gays.

In any case hating gays is so wrong and certainly not what Jesus would do. Jesus never promoted hate, only the right wingers who have hijacked Jesus to USE for their own political gains are the real confused ones.

The right wingers never seem to realize that their hate, their trivialization of Jesus and their hijacking of government and Constitution are only serving to turn America into a catastrophe.

Their hate agenda has served them well but for how much longer will their house of cards remain standing before the American people wake up. Could the 2006 elections be the beginning of the end of their hate machine mindset and political machine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But it's not just toys
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Nov 2, 2007 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, SO many plastic objects leech oestrogen, which apparently causes males to have lower iq's, for example, when exposed ot such environments even as foetuses. I saw a report on tv about this a couple of years ago. Bloody frightening...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]