Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

What Women Aren't Told About Childbirth

By Manda Aufochs Gillespie and Mariya Strauss, AlterNet. Posted October 20, 2007.


A new survey of mothers reveals some disturbing things about hospital maternity care that may make pregnant women want to take a closer look at their options.
Advertisement

Even in this age of cybervoyeurism and hyperinformation, the act of having a baby remains one of the few bodily activities about which many people choose to remain blissfully ignorant. This might best be described as the "but it won't happen to me" phenomenon. Understandably, women hope, despite all they may learn otherwise, that pregnancy, childbirth and parenting will go easier for them -- their baby will sleep, their feet won't swell to the size of melons and, of course, they will have an uncomplicated -- sweaty, perhaps, but not seriously painful -- labor.

Like most myths, there are the people for whom the fiction is the reality, but they are the exception. Chances are your baby will cry at night; your feet will swell; and unless you are willing to research in depth, shop around for care providers and advocate stubbornly for what you want, you probably won't have the labor you expect. This isn't just a benign statement about how we never get what we expect: A new survey of mothers reveals some disturbing things about hospital maternity care that may make pregnant women want to take a closer look at their options.

The survey Listening to Mothers II (LM 2) was released in 2006 and reports on U.S. women's childbearing experiences. Conducted for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive in partnership with Lamaze International and Boston University School of Public Health, it is the first comprehensive survey of women's childbearing experiences. The survey population is representative of U.S. mothers 18 to 45 who gave birth to a single infant in a hospital, with 1,573 actual participants.

"The predominant picture that emerges from our data," the report states, "is of large segments of this population experiencing clearly inappropriate care."

The majority of women ended up attached to IVs, catheters and fetal monitors. They had their membranes artificially ruptured and were given epidurals. Most of these women had little understanding of the side effects of these interventions, including cesarean and medical inductions. The report also shows that though women understood that they had the right to refuse medical interventions, few did, and many received interventions, such as episiotomies, without their consent.

Just as troubling is what is not being done. A "very tiny minority" of women received all of the care practices that promote natural birth. "With 4 million U.S. births annually, a single percentage point represents about 40,000 mothers and babies per year," the report authors say. Despite the relative health of women in the United States, many women are not getting the uncomplicated births they might expect.

But whose responsibility is it to make sure a baby's birth is a positive experience for the mother and her family? And what kind of birth do women want?

Achieving a more natural natural birth

Popular media outlets and advertisers would have women believe that labor and delivery happen in only one context: hospitals. When television shows, health magazines and films depict birth as a highly medicalized phenomenon that involves lots of screaming, a command to push and a baby before the next commercial break, it is no wonder that so few women in labor think to ask for more information when they are offered medical interventions. Or that so few are educated about natural childbirth.

Juli Walter teaches childbirth education classes on Chicago's northwest side. "Most of my students have an idea when they come to class that they would like to have a natural childbirth," says Walter. "However, they don't really have an understanding of what they need to have a natural birth." Though some make an effort to learn about birth from other mothers or books, most pregnant women don't have a grasp of the details of childbirth -- things like the physical and emotional stages of labor, the anatomical changes their bodies are experiencing, or the amount of pain they are likely to experience in labor and delivery.

Even among the women who say they want a natural birth, the term "natural" doesn't always mean the same thing. Many people believe that labor and birth are a natural human process, engineered by evolution with such sensitivity that any intervention -- like administering anesthesia or drugs to speed labor -- could cause it to malfunction. Under this model, most births are attended by midwives who act as lifeguards -- well-trained birth professionals who will be constantly present and intervene only if serious complications arise. This type of assistance during a birth, says doula and certified professional midwife (CPM) Mary Doyle, is "more about collaborating and being an ally to a pregnant woman, honoring her choices and letting her be in control of her experience rather than dictating what is going to happen."

Following this model of care for labor and birth, a woman might have her baby at home or in a midwife-staffed birthing center, both with the ability to transfer to a nearby hospital. Women have all sorts of reasons for wanting an alternative to hospitals: "For some women, it's the intimacy of birth that makes them want a birth center or to give birth at home," says Gayle Riedmann, a Certified Nurse-Midwife (CNM) who runs a midwifery practice in Oak Park, Ill. She is a board member of the Health and Medicine Policy Research Group (HMPRG), a group of health professionals and researchers that advocates for health-related policy improvements across the state.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: childbirth, labor, pregnancy, mothers, cesareans

Manda Aufochs Gillespie has served as editor of F Newsmagazine and Ink Literary Journal and was a regular contributing writer for the journal EcoCity Cleveland. Her work has been published in Conscious Choice , Cleveland Magazine, Communities Journal. Manda had her first baby at home with midwives in November 2006. Mariya Strauss' recent publications include literary reviews for Bookslut.com, feature articles and art reviews in F Newsmagazine. She recently edited a catalogue of essays published by the Video Data Bank. Mariya had her first baby in a hospital in September 2006.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yeah!
Posted by: TT18 on Oct 20, 2007 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially if you have SIX of them:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are proof Posted by: Rolomax
» RE: Yeah! Posted by: tkwilson
Whatever happened to the birthing chair and Lamaze classes?
Posted by: progressivegrannie on Oct 20, 2007 1:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former labor and delivery nurse (in the dark ages, or as my grandson says, in the Pleistocene era) in our rural Nebraska hospital we educated our expectant mothers, held Lamaze classes, and sat at the bedside of each and every expectant couple. We provided comfort measures, coaching, empathy and tried very hard to make childbirth a postive experience. We found, in our study, that using the birthing chair (which I also used myself) helped with pushing and made everything more comfortable for the mother. When my own daughters had their children I was aghast at what they were told by their OB/GYN's a mere 20 years later. Epidurals and drugs were the solution to everything. There were no nurses at the bedside, and everything was so detached and clinical. It seemed these modern OB/GYN's want to do childbirth on a 9-5 basis. What a sad, sad way to welcome new lives into our world. A far cry from rural Nebraska and our quiet, dark birthing rooms that were calm and welcoming to the new babies and supportive of their parents. Of course, that was back in the Pleistocene era of the 1980's, when hospital staffing was somewhat better and physicians were much more attuned to quality care and not pushed by insurance companies to perform quantity care by limiting the number of minutes they could spend with patients. Imagine, back then, the hospital paid us, the nurses to conduct Lamaze classes and birthing classes and breast feeding classes. How archaic!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Epidurals.
Posted by: heid on Oct 20, 2007 3:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is right on target, and demonstrates the danger of making healthcare a for-profit function. When there are profits to be made, anything seems to be considered acceptable. A normal process? Medicalize it. So what if it increases the dangers involved? There's money to be made in them thar women!

Sadly, the risks to the mother are significantly greater than stated in the article. Epidurals, noted as the standard of care in deliveries, carry a risk that no pregnant woman is told about (and no one receiving them for back pain, either). They carry the risk of arachnoiditis, a permanent crippling and horrifically painful condition that destroys all quality of life. How many women would agree to an epidural knowing that they might find themselves in never-ending pain that may be as severe as what they're trying to escape?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Menopause, too Posted by: anothername
Congratulations on an excellent article
Posted by: akai ringo on Oct 20, 2007 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulations, Alternet, on an excellent article. What comes out of this article for me above all is the need for far deeper and more widepsread evidence-based research, and for the results of this research to be fed into the process of managing childbirth, and for much more education of expectant mothers on the various childbirth-associated options and their respective benefits and risks.
For example, on the use of an epidural injection, while this is one of the most effective ways of reducing the intensity of labor pains, many expectant mothers are not, I suspect, aware that it is likely to prolong the labor process and decrease the likelihood of a vaginal birth without some form of further intervention, which may range from forceps or episiotomy to C-section. Incidentally, with all respect to the post that linked epidural injection to arachnoiditis, my understanding is that what the person is actually thinking of is ESI (epidural steroid injection), which is a non-surgical treatment used in back pain and quite different from the epidural injection administered during labor. My point here is simply to emphasize that there is an urgent need to increase the quality of the education given to pregnant women, and that it is totally wrong, though unfortunately in the U.S. probably inevitable for this to be influenced by the views of HMOs.
The other major point for me is the ongoing increase in the medicalization of childbirth. This is something that has been going on for quite a long time now, and Barbara Ehrenreich is among the people who have been most prominent in highlighting this, but I did not realize until I began to look into this topic that, for example, midwives are illegal in 11 American states. I may be wrong, but it seems to me that America's goal, if it continues on its present path, is to make childbirth the exclusive province of OGs, only permitted in the hospital authorized by your HMO, and compulsory cesarean sections before the onset of labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just had our baby boy
Posted by: digitalfrenzy on Oct 20, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife and I chose to use a midwife instead of going into the 'baby machine' of hospital care. My wife delivered our 9lb son without the use of any drugs. We had our son at home, with the highest level of care. It really sickens me that our society has brainwashed women to thinking that c-sections are ok, and that using drugs in a hospital is the only way to go. By choosing to use a midwife, the information passed on to us, as well as the face-time we received with our midwife was nothing less than perfect. I would recommend to any couple that midwifery is far superior to hospital birthing. Thank you Alternet for a very important article for anyone thinking about becoming parents. I cannot stress my happiness enough with our choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just had our baby boy Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Just had our baby boy Posted by: DaBear
BACK WHEN ALL BABIES WERE BORN AT HOME
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 20, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many more of them died. A respiratory problem in a newborn has to be addressed immediately. It's not for all women. As for the rest, it's true that despite classes of all kinds, women are not prepared. They've seen too may story book deliveries on TV. Many decisions cannot be made beforehand. But I do hear about more problems now than I did 20yrs. ago. Mothers are older are usually living with a stressful schedule. So Read and ask alot of questions. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not the whole story. Posted by: heid
Caution is warranted....
Posted by: Gisele on Oct 20, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking only from personal experience, I think caution is advisable when giving birth at home, or in birthing centers - especially if it's your first birthing experience.

I gave birth to my daughter at the age of 25, there were no complications of any kind during my pregnancy - I was a very healthy and active woman, both before and during the pregnancy.

Every visit to my doctor throughout that amazing experience ended the same "you're doing great, baby is doing great." We both looked forward to a wonderful and natural birth experience. I had considered giving birth at home with my Mom and sisters present, but Mom set her tiny foot down and said "no way, that's what hospitals are meant for." In this case she was right. There were NO signs or hints that anything at all could or would, go wrong.

To make a long story short - the first twinge of a contraction happened at midnight, my daughter was born at 12:55...and I was pronounced clinically dead at 1:10 am. It's only by the knowledge and hard work of two older and experienced doctors, (led by the Great Physician Himself) and a team of experienced nurses that I'm here today. Had I been at home, I'd still be dead, and I only lived 10 minutes away.

Ideally, it would be great if we could bear our children at home in the same bed they were conceived in - but sometimes reality bites! Is it worth the risk to both Mother and child?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Caution is warranted.... Posted by: lmwilker
» Um, yeah. Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Caution is warranted.... Posted by: notinKansas
» RE: Caution is warranted.... Posted by: abrunvand
Natural Childbirth is available if you want it
Posted by: hbill on Oct 20, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife has just given birth to twins in a hospital with ZERO drugs and ZERO machines hooked up (and this was at Cedars Sinai in Los Angeles!!!) We invested the time to find the right OBGYN by calling midwives and doulas and asking them, "if we want to give birth in a hospital, who is the best OBGYN you know of." We then went and interviewed a few doctors until we found one that was a fit. We now have three perfectly healthy children born in a hospital, but OUR way. We also submitted our birthing plan to the hospital and had to sign many release of liability forms along the way!!! And we highly recommend Ina Mae's book as it celebrates the birthing process rather than medicalizes it!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mine was, heid... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Mine was, heid... Posted by: MAD
» RE: Mine was, heid... Posted by: heid
» I don't think..... Posted by: mjabele
» I don't think.....cont. Posted by: mjabele
Home Births
Posted by: EJ on Oct 20, 2007 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm just wondering...in states where women are forbidden to have home births, will they be charged with a crime if they go into labor and don't make it to a hospital in time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Home Births Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: Home Births Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Home Births Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: Home Births Posted by: sunflwrmoonbeam
The Law in Indiana
Posted by: lmwilker on Oct 20, 2007 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Parents will not be prosecuted but midwives will for practicing medicine without a license. That's why we left our midwife's name off when we registered our children's births and put my husband down as having delivered them instead. Even in cases where babies have died duing home births the parents who chose that option have never been charged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The same medicalization is happening in New Zealand
Posted by: jparsons on Oct 20, 2007 3:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With less than impressive results.

Hospitals and birthing centres

On the other hand, home birth midwives are held personally
responsible for any birth difficulty, whether preventable or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fertility Clinics
Posted by: vertical on Oct 20, 2007 4:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another thing not told to perspective parents from a fertility doctor is that a child concieved this way is two and a half timees more likely to be born with severe birth defects. This is a fact printed in black and white in both the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Insurance doesn't cover natural childbirth
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 20, 2007 8:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which is terribly ironic since a midwife costs less than a hospital. Also, most CNM's won't take a case likely to be complicated or risky enough to warrant hospital access.

Still statistics show that most non-intervention (natural) childbirth is safer than the interventions. The article would do well to cite them. (Mothering has 'em in abundance).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Parents should feed their children the correct foods from birth.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 21, 2007 2:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of stuffing and spoiling them with junk foods, give them the healthy stuff. Then there'll be a future for America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be careful when it's your first
Posted by: kuro_neko on Oct 22, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I used a birthing center for my first, and when my contractions stalled (and I was still not dilating all the way after several hours of labor) they gave me blue/black cohosh and caster oil. Then my contractions wouldn't stop - I had two simultaneous waves going, no break - for hours. Still no dilation. The shift-change midwife came, checked on baby's heart-rate and said I had to go to the hospital ASAP. Once I got there I had to wait 2 hours for the epidural b/c they were crowded. They stopped the contractions and monitored the baby until it was evident he was getting tired - They rushed me in for c-section, and he was delivered with agpar score of 2 and had myconium. Thankfully they got him up to 9, and he's fine....But I have a nephew who should have been born by c-section, and they refused....and he 'died' on the table several times and now has cerebral palsy, and my sister won a lawsuit against the hospital, which now only just affords her the ability to care for her son.

I believe it's safer to have the hospital resources close and available, and there are certainly times when a c-section is a necessity - and no doctor or midwife should refuse to perform one if it is needed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Incredibly Irresponsible Article
Posted by: MLO on Oct 22, 2007 8:00 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What an incredibly irresponsible article. Westerners - especially city slickers - are incredibly ignorant of how often things go wrong before, during, and after birthing. No responsible midwife would ever not have a hospital resource nearby. In the First World alone, we are seeing increasing numbers of women with Pre-eclampsia and larger babies, something that automatically guarantees issues with "natural childbirth."

If a baby is too large to exit via the birth canal, tearing, internal damage, and hemorrhaging will occur. I know several women to whom this has happened and they very much regret not taking the advice of their OB/GYN. You see, the dirty little secret of the "natural" childbirth group is that a full 20% of natural births world wide result in damage to the lower digestive tract and urinary tract. This causes an inability to control bodily functions once taken for granted, it can also lead to sepsis and death if not treated quickly. It takes a qualified surgeon to do that.

The airy fairy nonsense espoused in this article is just that, airy fairy nonsense. Most of the increase in ceasareans are not coming from the side of physicians, but the side of women who do not want to have to suffer any longer than they already have through their pregnancies.

There is and never has been "safe" childbirth in any mammal. Please quit yourself of that very damaging myth. It is the tool that the Religious Right use to fight against abortion as well.

As to the ignoramus who said fertility treatment has a higher rate of birth defects, I suggest you learn a little about statistics. There was no difference between the rate of birth defects among fertility patients and the general populace when controlling for other factors - except in the case of certain types of male infertility. (And even then, the rate was only 1.5% higher.) Please don't talk about things of which you obviously know only enough to make yourself look foolish.

Yep, this article angers me because I have seen first hand the damage the "natural" childbirth movement has caused. If they are not also a trained Registered Nurse, run, don't walk the other way. They won't be able to help you if something goes wrong, and in a birthing situation, something can go wrong in a blink of an eye. Ask someone who whelps puppies or kittens, or raises farm animals how often something can go wrong - let alone human midwives and doctors.

Once again, Alternet allows ignorant radicals with agendas to write less than well-researched articles espousing nonsensical positions. I haven't considered this anything more than entertainment for awhile, but at this point, it just pisses me off because you may have condemned some woman and child to either death or disability.

Pax,

MLO

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One Size Does NOT Fit All
Posted by: Jo1028 on Oct 23, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article and the range of comments clearly illustrate that there is no one type of childbirth that is right for all women. And that fact also clearly demonstrates the reason why women must educate themselves about the options available to them and not be conned by stereotypes and what they see on TV. Each birth is unique and mother's body may respond differently each time. And women (couples) must be adult enough to take responsibility for being prepared, and not expect others to do it for them.

I do agree that current trends and dissatisfactions are probably the result of the huge move to for-profit health care. One more salient fact is that the US now ranks 41st among developed countries in maternal deaths - eastern Europe and Bosnia! have lower rates of maternal death than the US. Some of the blame has to go to those folks who would rather advocate for the pre-born than the newborn. This country in its devisive political fights over 'wedge' issues have forgotten that the health of families and children it what should come first - the veto of SCHIP and inability to override is the best recent example of negation of the country's future health and well-being.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I loved my epidural
Posted by: linden on Oct 23, 2007 11:06 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had such painful back labor my body couldn't relax enough for my cervix to dilate. After almost twelve hours of struggle, I asked for an epidural. About two hours later, I was fully dilated and ready to push. My twins were born vaginally -- no C-section needed. It was great.

Women should not have to put up with unnecessary pain for the sake of some fuzzy-minded principle about what's "natural."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bully for you.. Posted by: abrunvand
Homebirth is legal in every state
Posted by: laurashanley on Oct 24, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article!! One error - homebirth is legal in every state. However in some states the birth cannot be attended by a midwife. Women are free to have unassisted births (which an increasing number of them are doing).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homebirth.
Posted by: Pariah on Oct 24, 2007 9:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reasons mentioned in this article make me so thankful that we found out about the option to have a homebirth before I got pregnant with our son. I've had more then my fair share of doctors who either completely blew off my questions, or gave me entirely incorrect answers to my questions. When I found out I was pregnant, I decided I was not going to deal with that anymore. I found amazing midwives who actually answered all of my questions (not just rushed me in and out of an appointment as fast as possible!) and encouraged me to be the decision maker when it comes to my health. I was healthy and confident going into my labor, which lasted four hours and was free of any interventions. Our son was perfectly healthy when he was born, I recovered quickly, and we received excellent breastfeeding support and help adjusting to life with a baby. Our midwives came to our house after the birth for all of our postpartum appointments. We were treated with respect and love, and I KNOW we would have not had such a positive experience if we birthed in a baby factory atmosphere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can only plan so much.
Posted by: Alli on Oct 25, 2007 6:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article makes a lot of good points, but seems to suggest that if a woman educates herself, takes the time to choose a birth option wisely, and searches far and wide for the perfect doctor/midwife/doula, all will go according to plan. After having three babies and three very different labor experiences, the only thing I learned is that what you expect to happen, probably won't happen.

If anything, doctors and nurses in hospitals simply need to be more aware of what women in their care need. I loved my OBGYN, but some of the nurses I encountered when our first child was born acted like I had brain damage. It was my first baby, and many of them had the attitude that I didn't know what was going on and shouldn't bother them. I will never forget the skeptical looks that flew around the room when I said I needed to push. After only an hour of labor, they didn't believe me. Surprise, our daughter was born a mere ten minutes later. Our second baby, a boy, was also born quickly but with the help of pitocin and pain meds that made me hallucinate. A horrible experience, so when we were expecting our third only a year and a half later, I was a wimp. Had a planned induction and an epidural at the first sign of pain and it was the most peaceful, calm birth of the three. We've been blessed with three very healthy children and no complications from birth, but really, so many aspects of life, including childbirth, are simply out of our control. Yes, women need to make informed choices AND health care providers need to respect those choices. But implying that there is a way to have the labor and delivery of your dreams is a bit misleading. There are no guarantees in life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Strong Mothers
Posted by: WitchyNy on Oct 27, 2007 4:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something about home birth often overlooked -is the pride it gives a woman in herself. I think women are being cheated of this pride.

To give birth at home, without drugs, to push the baby out on your own--to feed the baby with your own body-to realize that is what your body can do...that your body is more important than being skinny, or perfect looking to impress men--that giving birth is hard work-and you have to be STRONG--and MEN CAN'T DO IT.

That is too often stolen from us.

Of course, in an emergency-you must do what ever you must do-but far too often in a hospital-it is not an emergency at all-it is simply that hospitals are designed for SICK people.

And sick people are given drugs for pain. Natural Childbirth is painful-but it is not a disease we need to be cured of.

This is not something we want to lose the ability to do. There may come a time--when we are not overpopulated -when the human race is fighting to survive. We will need strong, healthy women-who can give birth naturally-and be proud to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dilemma
Posted by: LEILANI33 on Oct 28, 2007 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I totally agree with everything in this article and have read many books by women such as Ina May, and I am hoping to get pregnant with my first child ASAP. The problem that I face is, what are the alternatives? I hate hospitals, but live in an are where there are NO birthing centers within even an hour's drive. I also live in a small row-home with my husband, and we don't really feel like it's a good setting for a homebirth, and we have insurance but it won't cover homebirth. We aren't sure what to do, but just feel so frustrated that our options are limited!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dilemma Posted by: aloafofbread
Dilemma -- possible alternatives to home birth
Posted by: boygranddakar on Nov 1, 2007 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In L.A., all certified midwives only do home births, and I have a similar situation as Dilemma, where I am flanked by three neighbors with thin walls, and home birth is NOT an option. Further, there seem to be NO birth centers within less than an hour's drive away. (And if there's traffic when I'm in labor? Oh, heck no!)

Luckily, hospitals like Cedars Sinai and the UCLA Medical Center have CNMs on staff, and their services are covered by insurance. Of all my friends who have given birth, only three have had a "natural" childbirth, i.e. delivered vaginally without an epidural. One delivered at home; the other two delivered at UCLA.

(Incidentally, one of my friends had planned a home birth, but had complications that necessitated going to the hospital. She was quickly transported there and had a C-section, and both mother and baby were fine. She said that, despite how everything turned out, she was happy she had worked with her midwife and was glad the midwife was there to advocate for her in the hospital.)

The nice thing about the UCLA Medical Center is that they have absorbed many of the concerns of mothers and natural birth advocates. During labor, women are encouraged to move around, dance, and listen to music; after delivery, the baby is placed on the mother's chest; they provide a lactation consultant; and the baby rooms-in with the mother. Yes, it's still a hospital and not exactly the most "homey" environment, but for a hospital experience -- and for those who want the security of delivering in a hospital -- they do a lot of things right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]