Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health & Wellness

Michael Pollan: Americans' Unhealthy Relationship with Food

By Tom Philpott, Grist.org. Posted October 19, 2007.


An interview with food writer Michael Pollan about food, food politics and his latest book.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In his 1996 book Tasting Food, Tasting Freedom, the great food anthropologist Sidney Mintz concluded that the United States had no cuisine.

Interestingly, Mintz's definition of cuisine came down to conversation. For Mintz, Americans just didn't engage in passionate talk about food. Unlike the southwest French and their cassoulet, most Americans don't obsess and quarrel about what comprises, say, an authentic veggie burger.

But if cuisine comes down to talk, things are looking up a decade after Mintz cast his judgment. Now, more and more people are buzzing about food: not only about what's good to eat, but also -- appropriately for the land that invented McDonald's and Cheetos -- about what's in our food, where it came from, how it was grown.

No writer has galvanized this new national conversation on food more than Michael Pollan, from his muckraking articles on the meat industry for The New York Times Magazine earlier this decade to the publication last year of The Omnivore's Dilemma.

On a recent day when he was reviewing the galleys of his latest book, due out in January, I rang up Pollan at his Berkeley, Calif., home to talk ... about food.

Tom Philpott: So tell me a little bit about what you've been working on recently.

Michael Pollen: The new book is called In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto. It's a book that really grew out of questions I heard from readers after Omnivore's Dilemma, which was basically so how do you apply all this? Now that you've looked into the heart of the food system and been into the belly of the beast, how should I eat, and what should I buy, and if I'm concerned about health, what should I be eating? I decided I would see what kind of very practical answers I could give people.

I spent a lot of time looking at the science of nutrition, and learned pretty quickly there's less there than meets the eye, and that the scientists really haven't figured out that much about food. Letting them tell us how to eat is probably not a very good idea, and indeed the culture -- which is to say tradition and our ancestors -- has more to teach us about how to eat well than science does. That was kind of surprising to me.

It really comes down to seven words: "Eat food, not too much, mostly plants." What is food? How do you know whether you're getting food or a food-like product? The interesting thing that I learned was that if you're really concerned about your health, the best decisions for your health turn out to be the best decisions for the farmer and the best decisions for the environment -- and that there is no contradiction there.

TP: The other thing that's interesting, along the same lines, is this idea in American culture that what is good for you tastes bad, and what tastes bad is good for you.

MP: Yes, exactly right. There's no sacrifice in eating well, there is no sacrifice in pleasure. To the contrary, the best-grown food is actually the tastiest. Now, it wasn't always true. I mean, you know, in the first generation of organic farmers, they weren't that good at it. But the quality has dramatically improved and is superb right now.

TP: Then there's this idea that food is something you can endlessly fragment: if you find something in a food that's beneficial, you can isolate it, and concentrate it, and put it in a pill.

MP: It's the reductionist's logic of food science, basically. And the interesting thing is that whenever that has been tried, it has failed. Foods are much more than the sum of their nutrient parts, and you cannot expect to get the same effect. Now there are things like vitamins that have been isolated, and in their isolated form they can cure deficiency diseases. But when they've tried to take out the antioxidants, things like beta-carotene and vitamin E, they don't seem to work.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: food, michael pollan

Grist staff writer Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My cousin made millions from food science
Posted by: Frankstank on Oct 19, 2007 2:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is an expert flavouring frozen and chilled meals. She has made a fortune loading them up with salt, fat and chemicals. She is also really fat (she eats her own stuff). It is a sick culture.

I have done alright but chose not to do things that harm other humans. But guess who gets the most respect in the family? The fat multi-millionaire. Until people change their views about life and everything, nothing will stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Scarey.. Posted by: messedup
» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Re. that "telling quote"
Posted by: Shey on Oct 19, 2007 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...........in the San Francisco Chronicle by Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) "These city people don't know what they're talking about, they should stay out of it."

Excuse me? If you eat food, you should most definitely do the opposite. Educate yourself about what you're putting into your body, where it comes from, how it's produced. We're drowning in chemicals and salt and the meat of animals raised in the most unthinkably cruel and inhumane and unsanitary conditions, consuming second-hand antibiotics that are fed to these animals at a rate that is producing an ever growing resistance to medications that were once life saving.

The choices we make when we buy and consume food determines whether we support GMO crops or organic. Environmentally destructive mono-crops that are depleting the soil of nutrients and soaking it in toxic chemicals, produced by gigantic, taxpayer-subsidized agri-business, or the growing move toward more sustainable practices by smaller family farms.

Food production has become a political issue. How dare a member of Congress make such an inflammatory statement? And I'm not one of those "city people", I live in a very rural area where there are as many "Health Food Stores" as supermarkets and where small and organic farms are a powerful force in the politics of food production.

Awareness of the political and ethical ramifications of what we eat is the wave of the future. Dinosaurs like Rep. Peterson need to wake up and smell the organically grown, fair trade coffee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah. Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: e. that "telling quote" Posted by: jbur816
A Growing Hope.
Posted by: grumble-bum on Oct 19, 2007 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I first picked up Pollan's Dilemma with at least a little trepidation; I knew from reading some of his articles that I would likely enjoy parts of it, but when would his city-boy disconnect inevitably cause me to discount parts of his point of view? When would I think, "well, it's all well & good if you live in San Fransisco", or something similarly dismissive? When would I feel overwhelmed & depressed with the hopeless nature of the entrenched mass-produced food industry?

It turns out that I found his writing to be damn near life-changing. He has an infectious open-mindedness, respect for the people he profiles (regardless of their place in the system), & willingness to examine & reevaluate his own preconceptions. Combined with his excellent writing, these qualities are a breath of fresh air in this climate of division & suspicion. At several points, this often cynical reader found himself moved to literal tears.

The end result of reading The Omnivore's Dilemma, & then his earlier Botany of Desire, has been a galvanizing of long-held but scattered beliefs, & a renewed sense of hopeful purpose. Combined with some other influences, I've been inspired to return to school to continue building my knowledge as a long-time professional cook & hopefully apply some of these concepts more fully in my work.

Having now read this interview, I look forward to his forthcoming book. & I see that he hits the nail on the head once again- Indeed, the prizes in Cracker-Jacks are absolute ass anymore!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Growing Hope. Posted by: jbur816
Wonderful article!
Posted by: hagwind on Oct 19, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's so much great stuff in this article I don't even know where to start. Like the connection between "cuisine" and conversation.

And this: "I spent a lot of time looking at the science of nutrition, and learned pretty quickly there's less there than meets the eye, and that the scientists really haven't figured out that much about food. . . . It really comes down to seven words: 'Eat food, not too much, mostly plants.'"

"Foods are much more than the sum of their nutrient parts, and you cannot expect to get the same effect."

And this, which applies to just about everything else too:
"I think that there's some brainwashing going on with this idea that we don't have time to cook anymore. We have made cooking seem much more complicated than it is, and part of that comes from watching cooking shows on television -- we've turned cooking into a spectator sport."

My long-time theory is that (because everything's connected) if you understand one thing very well, you're well on the way to understanding how the world works. Michael Pollan started with food, and what he says about food (and farming, and feeding ourselves) says so much about other things as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wonderful article! Posted by: jbur816
A standout nutrition book
Posted by: BobbieP on Oct 19, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are going to read one nutrition book, read the one that is considered the gold standard: the China Study. One thing it says: eat no more than 5% of your calories from animal protein, preferably wild caught fish, and make that small ones, like salmon, not the ones you already know have chemicals in them.
The book is a classic, and it analyses many of the nutrition and health studies out there, and the food and vitamin industries. I completely changed the way I shop and eat after reading this book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americans do talk about food.
Posted by: colinmeister on Oct 19, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even American food. They don't talk about American junk food, but they will talk passionately about local foods. I remrmber an excited man from Connecticut talking about chowder, and deriding Manhattenites for "Putting ketchup in their chowder".

People in New Orleans will talk passionately about gumbo and crawfish, and people in Arkansas talk of fried okra and catfish. Texans are passionate about barbcues, and Chicagoans about their pizza and hot dogs, even though these are modified European foods.

American food has a horrible reputation outside America, due mainly to overseas expansion by junk food chains. I am, of course, English, and will talk passionately about well prepared British food, but of course for some reason Americans don't want to listen :-).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Americans do talk about food. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Huh?
Posted by: kelt65 on Oct 19, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't agree, that writer's obviously never been to New Orleans if he thinks Americans aren't passionate about food. There are other places as well.

On the whole, though, he's right; most of the US has been overrun with corporate chain restaurants and fast food crap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wheat thins and crack cocaine
Posted by: arshi on Oct 19, 2007 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last year I went hiking and took along some snacks, one of them being Wheat Thins. I sat on some rocks in a small river dropping litle peices of chicken into the water and watched the fish and crawfish feast away. Then I dropped some chips off Wheat Thins and they were ignored. I thought it was weird. Later, I put out some bread and Wheat Thins on a porch and watced as the birds and squirrels came to feast, but none of them ate the Wheat Thins. It was then I began looking into what I was eating, and I've almost completely stopped eating corporate food since then. Yes, it takes effort, and extra money. But if you have any doubt as to why you should not eat corporate food try this next test. Buy some Smart Chicken, or free range, and buy some Perdue chicken. Put them side by side, notice the color, the texture, then cook them the same way side by side and try them. You'll never eat factory chicken again if your smart.
(Sorry vegans, I eat meat in almost half of my diet - nver red though.)
Oh yeah, corporate food, like crack cocaine, are really bad things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Aha! Posted by: grumble-bum
Demon Food
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 19, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eating is to the left what sexuality is to the right. People must have a morality and with progressives, their hang up is increasingly eating. Just as the right has flaws in its theory so does the left. All this demonization of high fructose corn syrup. But unless one buys organic sugar, sugar production horribly exploits workers. Read about their lives.

Brainwashed we have no time to cook? The author needs to get a reality check on the lives of the working class. After working a dull, stressful, meaningless job all day, maybe the last thing one wants is another chore. Maybe they want something that tastes good to give themselves 2 minutes of pleasure in their otherwise miserable day, whether it is the best nutritional choice for them down the road or not.

Not that I disagree with much of what he says, but it will be academic for the vast majority of the public as the economic crisis worsens. Most people will simply have to consider cost as the bottom line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Demon Food Posted by: jbur816
» RE: Demon Food Posted by: yesman
» RE: Demon Food Posted by: Shey
The China study is a sham
Posted by: Focal on Oct 19, 2007 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The China study relied on poor data collection methodology ......ie. pooled blood samples from entire villages and self reported food consumption ....as well as a bias toward the highly flawed cholesterol hypothesis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great! Now the Recipes Please!!
Posted by: bjandresen on Oct 19, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved the interview and am in total agreement. The only thing is I don't know how to cook a nutritious and tasty meal in 30 minutes. So Michael Pollan, if you read this, how about a book of the recipes of the meals that you and your wife prepare? Even a small book would be helpful. Only the writers of cook books have the time to prepare the elaborate delights that they think up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A Few More Pointers... Posted by: grumble-bum
I Cook the Turkey.....It is not a BIG Deal...
Posted by: picket on Oct 19, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not that I didn't make a big mistakes the first few times around!!! My generation X and Y children have limited time and their children just love that fast food....but they also LOVE my "simple" cooking. We still have the junk food but a lot less of it. I have more time now to think.

I know fathers DO HELP but if Mom is shopping, putting them away, planning the meal AND doing the cooking plus holding down a JOB...."Come on People!!!"

Say a prayer over the food...we don't really know where most of it came from. Buy some boneless meat, always have cooking onions, celery, and carrots , some potatoes on hand. Buy the other veggies when they are on sale OR get some bags of frozen. Have some broth and pasta and canned tomatoes ..garlic powder, chili powder etc ...you will need a responsible non accident prone person to chop the veggies. Desserts are a must ...do a lot more with fresh cooked apples, peaches etc...don't need all that pie crust, limit ice cream portions [ for the kids only]...
Love watching the cooking shows BUT there is no way I am using all that butter, cream and olive oil, no wonder it tastes so good....but I get a LOT of great ideas.

Gotta go the "kids" are here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Farm subsidies
Posted by: BlueTigress on Oct 19, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is something that started out as simple that got complicated when the factory farmers (Archer Daniels Midland, Conagra, etc) got into the act.

They discovered that if they broke up their giant farms on paper and assigned them to employees, they could collect the subsidy checks because the farms were "individually owned". I saw a stat several years ago that ADM was making $300 MILLION a year doing this.

That is just plain wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even More Important Than Iraq: America Needs a New Cheese
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 19, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OCTOBER 27, 2006 – The most amazing thing about our nation at this moment is that no one even knows what the real, important issues are. All over the country people are freaking out about Iraq Five more people dead. Ten more. One hundred Iraqis. Seven Americans. Billions more dollars.

This people are worried about. But the far bigger problem, the problem of American Cheese - that, no one has the courage to even speak out about, never mind take on.

In fact, people look at me sideways when I try to broach the topic with them.

"Which party are you going to vote for this election," my friend asked me a few days ago.

"Which one is ready to legislate us a new national cheese?" I asked in return.

And all I got was a stare - that stare; the one I get again and again, every time I point out the cheese problem - a problem of scale and scope beyond Global Warming, Iraq, and Iran getting nukes combined.

Great, now you're looking at me like, too. But I'm not joking, I'm serious.

It all began some decades ago. Remember when Willy Lowman, that character in Arthur Miller's Death of A Salesman, asked, "How can you whip cheese?"

Well, Willy was right. You can't. Not real cheese. Not actual cheese. Not cheese that is actually cheese.

Ah... now the point is beginning to come out, isn't it.

But no, you don't want to listen. You let poor Willy Lowman run off unheard until he was so depressed he offed himself.

But now stop. And look at the basic reality: the cheese that bears our nation's proud name, American Cheese, is, well, not cheese at all. It is pressed, hydrogenated soybean oil.

So, in fact, not only is not actual cheese, but, even worse, it is not something humans can consume healthily. While cheese is an actual food and is good for you, American Cheese is a manufactured fake food that, thanks to the trans fats known as hydrogenated oil, is horrible for you.

Everyday we eat it. We go get a "cheeseburger." There's no cheese on it, it's this fake, deadly crap that, for some inexcusable reason, gets to wear our nation's good name.

This, my friends, is where it all began - yes, this is how we got to obesity, TV addiction, and, yes, even Iraq.

You don't think American Cheese got us into Iraq?

By accepting and consuming the non-cheese, non-edible garbage called American Cheese as if it were cheese, we set a precedent that has been followed again and again.


Click above to read the rest of the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Jargon Question
Posted by: Fruno on Oct 20, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So . . . what is a CSA? Am I once again the last to learn a new jargon term?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Jargon Question Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
www.votenic.com
Posted by: votenic on Oct 21, 2007 9:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WEEKLY POLL

http://www.votenic.com

Results Posted Tuesday Evening.
FREE, NON-BIASED

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American's don't argue the perfect food?!
Posted by: swarmofkillermonkeys on Oct 22, 2007 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK. Great interview, actually. But I also take exception to:
For Mintz, Americans just didn't engage in passionate talk about food. Unlike the southwest French and their cassoulet, most Americans don't obsess and quarrel about what comprises, say, an authentic veggie burger.

Aside from the regional specialties mentioned, apparently this person has had neither PIZZA nor BBQ!

Heck, I've seen fistfights over ordering "real pizza" (Chicago Style) versus "good pizza" (New York Style). Yeesh, don't even get me started on when someone pipes up with a, "hey, how about a whole-wheat crust with that nasty white goo instead of tomato sauce from a chain restaurant?" That's just asking for it. Passion abounds in American pizza.

BBQ is the more traditional argument food, of course, because there is so much more to argue over. Gas, briquettes, or honest wood chunks? What kind of wood smoke? Again from shavings, chips, pellets or chunk? Does is HAVE to be offset only to be called BBQ? Then why do people call grilling (which is really broiling) BBQ? Doesn't there HAVE to be wood (not that imitation black goop)? Larding with garlic? Dry rub? Wet mop? Is Pork really the one true BBQ meat? And then the sauces... or no sauce? Vinegar or no? Which cut is best? Bone in or bone out? How do you serve it?

Man... I need some BBQ... Pork shoulder, hickory or pecan chunks over gas (or as wood chunks), thick dry rub, 14 hours, NO sauce!. Well, maybe juuust a little North Carolina or St. Louis style if it is somehow dry -- Texas and KC is for BEEF!. Mmm, beef. Brisket of course, larded with garlic, no dry rub, mesquite again over gas, with Texas style thin and spicy sauce (not so much vinegar or sugar).

Whew! Man, I'm hungry. How about you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American's don't argue the perfect food?! Posted by: swarmofkillermonkeys
A Vegetarian always has to post when it comes to food topics
Posted by: dennisinmemphis on Oct 23, 2007 10:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So here it is - I'm the veg head in the family- husband to one and parent to two omnivores - so don't imagine I have anything particularly dictocratic to say to anyone who likes to eat some meat. But the point I'd like to make is that on the whole WAY LESS meat in a typical diet would be good both for you and the world you [we] live in. There's all kinds of statistics to demonstrate this - goveg.com if you are interested is a good place to start. I truly don't have any desire to 'stamp-out' meat eating - but I am befuddled, and dismayed overall to see the unnecessarily large meat portioning that is advertised so frequently as the centerpiece of every meal.

At this point I'm the primary cook and I don't cook meat. IF the wife or kids [teens] want their meat they know they have to cook it themselves. Mostly they don't though - and so they are very light omnivores. They think they're too busy I guess. I can tell you in my experience vegetarian cooking is cleaner [no grease] - way easier to clean up after and cheaper. An article ran on MSN a while back which presented a comparative cost study of meat/omnivore vs. vegetarian and vegetarian came out on top as the economical winner. Remarkable really in view of the fact that our agribusiness system is so geared-up to produce meat! Once you learn to focus on plant protein complementing as the center [more or less] of meal planning, it is easy. Once you master a few basic cooking methods you hardly even need cookbooks. And the author is correct - it's not that hard to put on a meal in 30 mins. You do definitely have to keep your pantry stocked though. Nothing to work with can defeat those good intentions. I have to drive across town for the farmers market - but I do go a couple times a month --the Wild Oats supermarket is just a few minutes so I can always get my organic 'fix' in there.

The short of it - eat less or no meat - you won't miss it [most people anyway], it's green and good and ecologically sound, and cheaper too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]