Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Does Early Alcohol Use Lead to Abuse?

By Stacy Teicher Khadaroo, Christian Science Monitor. Posted September 11, 2007.


Research shows that exposure to alcohol in middle school raises the risk of social problems later in life.
Advertisement

For six years, John Donovan's "hobby" was to dig up hard-to-find data on children's use of alcohol. With so much attention paid to binge drinking by high-schoolers and college students, he wanted to shine a light on what was happening with kids even before junior high.

"The younger that people are when they start to drink," says Mr. Donovan, an associate professor of psychiatry and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, "the more likely they are to have problems with alcohol in adolescence and in later life, and the more likely they are to be involved in a whole variety of other problematic behaviors," like absence from school, delinquency, use of illicit drugs, drunken driving, and risky sexual activity.

By eighth grade, about 40 percent of American students say they've had some alcohol, but Donovan looked at an even younger set in a report just published in the September issue of Prevention Science. He found that between fourth and sixth grades, the prevalence of alcohol use increases significantly. In one national survey, for instance, about 10 percent of fourth-graders and 29 percent of sixth-graders said they'd had more than a sip of alcohol. In a survey in New York State, 21 percent of fifth- and sixth-graders reported having had a drink of alcohol at some point, including 7 percent who had drunk liquor, as distinct from beer or wine.

Broad conclusions can't yet be drawn, because the data are scattered in various substance-use and behavior surveys that span more than a decade, but Donovan's hope is to impel people to examine an age group that's been largely overlooked in alcohol studies. The data suggest that prevention might best be timed around fifth-grade, he says. Such efforts would be most effective, he and others say, if they involve not just schools, but families and whole communities as well.

"Parents should know that even when they give children alcohol in family contexts, there is still a risk that their children would be more likely to be involved in problematic use later on," Donovan says.

But much more research is needed to reveal the context in which children have alcohol and the amount they drink, he and other researchers agree.

"If a kid reports that they had wine with communion ... that's a very different thing than that they one day sat down and drank a whole beer with their father," says Vivian Faden, a deputy director at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism in Bethesda, Md. "Drinking with the family isn't the same in every family," she says.

From a public policy perspective, however, Ms. Faden says it would be appropriate to send a general message that it's not a good idea for young children to drink.

In a statement last March to announce a "National Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking," Acting Surgeon General Kenneth Moritsugu said that those who start drinking before age 15 "are five times more likely to have alcohol-related problems later in life. New research also indicates that alcohol may harm the developing adolescent brain." He urged parents, schools, students, and governments to work together on the issue.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drinking, substance abuse, alcohol

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
a social problem, not a law enforcement problem
Posted by: vasumurti on Sep 11, 2007 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Programs aimed at curbing the use of mind-altering substances among young people (e.g., teen drinking and teen smoking) are admirable, but does this mean mild forms of intoxication should be criminalized?

According to a 2003 Zogby poll, two of every five Americans say "the government should treat marijuana the same way it treats alcohol: It should regulate it, control it, tax it, and only make it illegal for children."

Alcohol, not marijuana, is the most abused drug in the United States. There are an estimated eight million known alcoholics in America, and the number increases by 450,000 every year. One survey reported that 75 percent of all crimes and 60 percent of all divorces have drinking in their background. The National Safety Council reports that 50 percent of all traffic deaths are caused by drunk drivers.

According to Dr. John McDougall, over seven percent of the adult population in the United States suffers from alcoholism, resulting in decreased productivity, accidents, crime, mental and physical disease and disruption of family life. Excessive consumption of alcohol leads to liver disease, cancer, birth defects (fetal alcohol syndrome) and multiple vitamin deficiency diseases.

A report by the World Health Organization states: “Alcohol is a poison to the nervous system. The double solubility of alcohol in water and fat enables it to invade the nerve cell. A man may become a chronic alcoholic without ever having shown symptoms of drunkenness.” The conclusion of the report is that nobody is immune to alcoholism and total abstinence is the only solution.

Dr. McDougall writes further that excessive consumption of caffeine leads to an elevated heart rate, irregular heart beat, increased blood pressure, frequent urination, increased gastric secretion, nervousness, irritability and insomnia. Caffeine is known to cause birth defects in animals, and may do the same in humans. Caffeine stimulates the growth of breast cells, causing benign lumps.

Excessive intake of caffeine may cause a rise in blood fats. Cancer of the urinary bladder has been linked to caffeine use and it contributes to loss of calcium from the body. Moreover, the body actually becomes physically addicted to caffeine. Withdrawal symptoms include headaches, drowsiness, tension and anxiety.

Again, programs aimed at curbing the use of mind-altering substances among young people (e.g., teen drinking and teen smoking) are admirable, but does this mean mild forms of intoxication should be criminalized?

Rufus King, a Washington DC lawyer who has served on the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, calls the drug war “a worthless crusade.”

According to King, drug use is a social problem, not a law enforcement problem. He observes:

“Cigarette use is declining through changes in cultural values in the population. Like most smokers and alcoholics, most users of illegal drugs poison themselves because they want to be intoxicated. No human force can do them much good until they want help.”

King is optimistic that the current anti-drug hysteria will subside, and responsible and reasonable drug law policies will be adopted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not healthy
Posted by: terihu on Sep 12, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alcohol isn't good for your body, period.

As adults, we can make that decision for ourselves, how much to drink, what we're willing to do to make up for an indulgence or two.

You can't expect kids to make the same informed choices. You could argue that parents have the right to make them for them, but responsible adults should recognize that alcohol has insidious effects on a growing body.

This is not to say a taste here or there, or a liqueur-filled chocolate is going to stunt a child's growth. Just that there are reasons beyond the moral or legal to limit a child's alcohol intake...and it seems to me that for the sake of good health, no booze for kids has more weight as an empirical biological fact, than any artificially constructed reason that society can impose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]