Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Will New Patch Boost Women's Sex Drives?

By Frances Cerra Whittelsey, Women's eNews. Posted September 11, 2007.


A controversial testosterone patch, touted as a way to boost women's sex drives, is now on the market in Europe. Should the U.S. be next?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The arrival on the European market of a female-targeted testosterone patch to treat low sex desire caused by menopause is raising new questions in the United States about why there is no equivalent product on pharmacy shelves. Opponents say that there is good reason why, and the patch is not ready for U.S. approval.

The European Medicines Agency -- the European Union's equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration -- approved sales of Procter and Gamble's Intrinsa testosterone patch last year, and it went on sale this spring. The patch is intended for women distressed by low sexual desire after surgical removal of their ovaries and uterus.

Three years ago, the FDA turned down Procter and Gamble's application for U.S. approval of Intrinsa because of inadequate safety data while also concluding that it was effective. Instead U.S. women who want testosterone rely on products for men or creams specially mixed by pharmacists.

Cincinnati-based Procter and Gamble estimates that 15 to 20 percent of prescriptions written for men's testosterone products are used by women.

About 621,000 U.S. women a year undergo hysterectomies, more than any other country, most often to remove uterine fibroids (benign tumors) or because of endometriosis, which causes tissue to grow outside the uterine lining. Of U.S. women alive today, 22 million have undergone a hysterectomy and about 75 percent lost their ovaries along with their wombs.

Removal of the ovaries means plunging immediately into menopause. These women, plus those in natural menopause, represent a potential testosterone market of billions of dollars. By age 60, 1 in 3 U.S. women will have had a hysterectomy.

Testosterone in women, as in men, stimulates sexual desire and affects the level of sexual pleasure besides contributing to muscle and bone mass and general good health. Half a woman's testosterone is lost if her ovaries are removed (the other half is produced by the adrenal glands); natural menopause gradually decreases testosterone levels by one-third. Estrogen supplements suppress the effects of the remaining testosterone, a side effect that has long been downplayed.

'Medicalization of Menopause'

The testosterone patch is now for sale in England, Germany, France and Italy, but

Leonore Tiefer, a critic of what she calls the "medicalization of sexual desire and menopause" opposes the product. She and other critics believe that the six-month clinical trials conducted by Procter and Gamble are "inadequate to assess the risks of extended" treatment.

A sex therapist and clinical associate professor of psychiatry at New York University, Tiefer relies on education and counseling to help women improve their sexual desire and experiences. A member of FDA advisory committees that recommend approval or rejection of new drugs, Tiefer described the European approval process as less stringent than the FDA's.

Because there are no long-term safety studies, the European drug agency has required Procter and Gamble to label Intrinsa with a special warning to that effect, and is monitoring use of the hormone.

Testosterone supplements for women are controversial not only because of safety questions but also because sexual desire in women results from a complex mix of physical, social and emotional factors.

Barbara Bartlik, a psychiatrist and sex therapist at Weill-Cornell Medical Center in New York, said she is eager to see the patch approved for the United States. "When patients who are low in testosterone get supplemented, there's a world of difference. They have a spark of interest back." That, she said, can encourage women to work on other problems, such as relationship difficulties, that might be interfering with their sex lives.

Testosterone also makes arousal and orgasm easier to achieve and more satisfying, Bartlik said. She prescribes a trial of testosterone cream that is compounded to order by pharmacists.

Not the 'Pink Viagra'

Some media reports have called the patch the new "pink Viagra," but the company's studies have shown that to be a misnomer. In contrast to Viagra, which can take effect in minutes, testosterone patch users take weeks before experiencing an uptick in sexual interest.

Two clinical trials conducted by Procter and Gamble involving about 1,000 women over six months also found that Intrinsa's libido effect was fairly subtle, with users reporting one more sexual experience per week than before enrolling in the trial.

Of great interest to critics like Tiefer is the limited quantitative sexual benefit for patch users, who reported just one additional satisfying sexual experience a month than those who received a placebo patch. Both groups were also helped by discussing their sexual problems with physicians and often their partners.

Concerns over the safety of Intrinsa linger, especially in light of the negative findings of the U.S. government's Women's Health Initiative in regard to estrogen supplements. The women in the testosterone trials were also receiving estrogen.

Dr. Johna Lucas, medical director for women's health at Procter and Gamble, said the safety data submitted in the approved application to the European Medicines Agency did not differ "materially" from the information provided to the FDA.

A spokesperson for the company declined to say whether the company has renewed its FDA application for approval.

Women's health advocates are adamant that longer-term studies are needed before another hormone is approved for use.

"We'd be delighted if they (Procter and Gamble) would come back with information about the testosterone patch that defined the risks," said Cindy Pearson, executive director of the National Women's Health Network, a nonprofit in Washington, D.C. "Define the risks, that's all we're asking for."

Hysterectomies Supply Drug Market

Nora Coffey, is founder of the Philadelphia-based Hysterectomy Educational Resources and Services Foundation, which provides public education about the surgery. She would like to limit the testosterone market by eliminating almost all hysterectomies because removal of the uterus and ovaries is the equivalent of male castration. She believes hysterectomies should be performed only on women with life-threatening problems and not for symptoms like excessive menstrual bleeding.

Seventy-five percent of 930 hysterectomized women who completed a questionnaire for the foundation reported "diminished or absent sexual desire" and nearly 60 percent reported "diminished or absent orgasm."

"So what if you could take something (testosterone) that made you desire sex," said Coffey, "but then what? You will not experience the uterus and pelvis filling with blood and the uterine contractions that occur during orgasm."

In July, the Journal of Sexual Medicine published an "add-on study" to Procter and Gamble's original clinical trials of Intrinsa.

According to the study's lead author Sheryl Kingsberg, slightly more than half the women said the increase in sexual activity of one experience per week was meaningful and beneficial. Eighty percent said they would like to continue treatment. Not every patch user responded to the treatment, and those who did not said they would not want to continue. The study was financed by Procter and Gamble.

Kingsberg believes the FDA should approve the patch. "We seem to have a different standard for tolerating risk-benefit for women than men, and risk-benefit for anything related to women's sexuality," she said. "Women's sexuality is considered almost a life-style choice rather than a health issue. Certainly the women thrown into menopause very young and even women who go into menopause in their 50s, they are not so ready to give up on their sexual lives."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sex drive, orgasm, testosterone, fda, intrinsa, procter and gamble, viagra, hysterectomies

Author and journalist Frances Cerra Whittelsey writes about consumer and women's issues and the environment from her home in Huntington Bay, Long Island. She has previously written about testosterone deficiency in the context of women's cancer treatment.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another ploy from big pharma
Posted by: Lector on Sep 11, 2007 12:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Kingsberg believes the FDA should approve the patch.” One might as well ask the CIA to approve the shock treatment trend from the 1950’s as an approved cure for individualism in a regimented society. The FDA's approvals are mostly worthless.

Any woman who puts chemicals into her body purely for sexual desire is going nowhere. That goes for men who take Viagra. Eating healthy and staying in top physical condition is probably the best way to increase sexual desire.

Big pharma thrives financially on making “cures” that usually come with a long list of side effects written in small print so they can sell you other cures which in turn cause other side effects. Big pharma is not to be trusted. All these studies they do are made to look and appear unbiased and pretend to give information and protect the consumer. The pharmaceutical industry spends hundreds of millions of dollars to get people to believe that drugs are safe and effective. Mostly, unless used for life-saving purposes, drugs are dangerous and cause disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another ploy from big pharma Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Another ploy from big pharma Posted by: Ian MacLeod
The Patch
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 11, 2007 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Using testosterone on women. You don't need to be a doctor or a scientist to picture some scary side effects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fundamental misunderstanding: Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Fundamental misunderstanding: Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Fundamental misunderstanding: Posted by: oregoncharles
You know what is really sick about this???? Europe banned natural remedies
Posted by: Prophit on Sep 11, 2007 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which were great for just such an issue with no side affects. How pathetically greedy they have become. They are as bad as we are. I guess the drug companies over there have bought and paid for their politicians as well. One thing about the European Union, it made it easier to own them instead of having to buy all from each country only those from the union, so much cheaper.

I guess that is why the NAU is going to go down here as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

removal of the uterus and ovaries is NOT the equivalent of male castration
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 11, 2007 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Removal of the ovaries and removal of the testes are similar, but the uterus is not the counterpart to the penis.

Women can have orgasms after the uterus and the ovaries have been removed. These orgasms can be just as intense and satisfying as those experienced prior to a full hysterectomy. (Trust me, I'm an authority on this.)

Libido is a different matter and is probably determined more by underlying attitudes toward sex, self and partner than by hormones.

Since women are most like men during the pre-menstrual part of the monthly cycle, i.e., they experience a surge of testosterone, why would anyone want to encourage what is effectively artificial PMT? Bad idea!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex and Haagan Daaz Ice Cream
Posted by: Candleinheart on Sep 11, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember back in the late '70's there was a poll taken of 800 women,they were asked, " If you had a choice would it be sex or Haagan daaz Ice Cream?" Over 80% chose the ice cream. i asked my husband at the time, "Why do you think this is?" He had no idea.
I do, it's because romance with sex has totally disappeared. When a woman has spent several years giving into her husband's/partner's demands like she was an animal to be mounted at will, she dies inside and sex becomes a chore, a torture.
Go to the movies today, man meets woman. Next scene they're in bed. No wonder we have so many rapes today. Men have been programmed that sex comes on demand when they want it. Unfortunately, I was in my late '40's when I heard this expression,"Women give sex to get love, and men give love to get sex." After listening to hundreds of women in my counseling practice, I heard much about unwanted, forced, insensitive, hard, cruel, porno film required sex, etc and not a whole lot about the women getting the love/romance they require.We're not animals.we're not 'holes'. We're delicate, refined, loving, tender, deeply sensitive human beings. The whole approach by most men in this society is wrong. then they get mad because women run from their cave man like tactics.
I have said many times, watch how a man cares for his car, warms it up before driving, is a good driver and you will have a good lover. Also, observe how a man cares for his Mother and you will have a good husband. Unless there is courtship, getting to know one another, doing some old fashioned kissing before jumping in the sack, sending love notes, a warm hug that is NOT a prelude to sex, a mention of her smell, her pretty legs, her smile, her laughter, SOMETHING and wanting to share quality time without pressing her against the refrigerator on first date, then she's going to be dormant in the desire department. Got to get her hormones flowing easily, in time, set up anticipation, etc. then the patch would never be needed. And...men must keep romance going until the end! Neither would need pills or sex films, etc. It's all an Art to be learned.
An 82 year old man hobbled into a gynacologist's office wanting a prescription for Viagra. The nurse told me 15 calls come a week for Viagra. And...almost the same calls from the wives pleading that the doctor not give them the Viagra. WHY? Because they've been treated like an animal, wanting sex only, mounting mechanically and forgetting the Fine Art of courting, tenderness, words, smells all needed for a woman to respond. Rather than market this controversial patch, have some course at schools or Adult Ed teaching men how to make love to their women. And women must learn to express their own special needs. Our bodies are like fine violins, we must teach the men how to play, they haven't a clue. It is awful this medicalization of sex. Once again, it is men controlling their women's bodies. We don't want a steady dose of Penis, we want affection, tenderness, suggestion, loving words, the right atmosphere, some creativity on the man's part! in my lifetime
i have heard three women declare, (they were born in Europe) "What has America done to her men?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Funny but sad rant Posted by: Phenix
» RE: Sex and Haagan Daaz Ice Cream Posted by: Logic's Edge
» I'll take the Haagan Daaz Ice Cream too Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Sex and Haagan Daaz Ice Cream Posted by: Ian MacLeod
A couple of years ago I saw this documentary on testosterone therapy and women ...
Posted by: SayBlade on Sep 11, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... but these were special cases where other forms of hormone replacement (HRT) were not effective. One woman worked in an executive position had to stop using it because all she thought about was having sex. Another, an actor in a popular TV series, found that it lifted her depression and her drive for living life to the fullest returned.

In the documentary it was emphasised that the amount needed for women is much less than for men since it is not supporting bodily features.

It is a question of balance. Each person's hormone requirements are different. What people need when they encounter body changes in life are more options like altering diet, herbal therapies, exercise regimens and as a last resort, pharmaceuticals. A healthy, stable relationship with a partner is also a big help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Testosterone = More Hair, Too
Posted by: bravegirl68 on Sep 11, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women who have PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome) have elevated levels of testosterone, and I can speak for many of us when we say extra TT isn't really a fun thing. You grow hair like a man, and then as you age, you inherit the male-pattern balding too. Kind of kills your sex drive on a whole 'nother level....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Too much Posted by: oregoncharles
Cocaine makes people really horny - let's legalize it!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 11, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cocaine is notorious for stimulating the sex drive. Don't take it from me - go to CNN:

"Or as her colleague, Dr. Helen Fisher put it: When you fall in love, "exactly the same system becomes active as when you take cocaine. You can feel intense elation when you're in love. You can feel intense elation when you're high on cocaine."

The testosterone bit is pretty weird, though:
"We now have physiological data that suggests there are different brain systems for sex and love," says Dr. Fisher.

"At some point, the two do become linked. People in love have elevated levels of dopamine. Lots of dopamine, in turn, triggers the production of testosterone, which is responsible for the sex drive in both men and women."


However, Big Pharma can't legally market cocaine, so they're trying to push testosterone treatments. As scientific american reported,
"Kingsberg and her team analyzed the results of a six-month trial of testosterone patches in 132 women reporting a lack of sexual desire resulting in personal distress or relationship problems. All were in "surgical menopause," meaning their ovaries had been removed, resulting in low production of sex hormones, including testosterone.

Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals made the patches and funded the study."


Guess who controls P&G? http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=PG

The usual suspects - Barclays UK, Warren Buffet's Berkshiure Hathaway, State Street, Fidelity, Vanguard, AXA, Mellon, Janus (of Enron fame)... and so on. You know, the same banks and funds that control CNN, ABC, FOX, CBS, NBC, and the rest of the corporate media.

They're entirely trustworthy and only have your health and happiness as their primary concern. Really.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The new "Spanish fly".
Posted by: Axiom69 on Sep 11, 2007 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can see it now, a husband getting charged with some sort of crime for sticking one of these patches to his wife while she sleeps. It's only a matter of time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ha ha...
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Sep 11, 2007 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every woman should have to wear one of these patches for a while, while every man she approaches tells her no and seems disgusted at being on the same planet as her.

Perhaps then they'd have a bit more appreciation for men and their lives.

Not being serious here, but there's a tiny kernel of truth at the bottom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» obviously a LOSER... Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
OH GREAT!?!!???
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 11, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally something to make our women horny as a two-peckered goat!!! Now all we need is something to make us guys last longer than two minutes!!!! Jesus Christ!!! Is sex all we're really about? is that the reason we're killing folks all over the world? Because our sex drive is low? Come on People,just how much easier would life be with endless sex? Hey maybe we'll be so tired from screwing we'd stop fighting,killing,stealing and lying and blowing up buildings.......
wait a second, maybe they are trying to prove 'Killing to make Peace is like Fucking to end Love'.
Who konws? Either way someone is going to get screwed.
Peace,
Jeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OH GREAT!?!!??? Posted by: drblack
"should BigPharma be **allowed** in the BEDROOM" ?!?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Sep 11, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ah, who says there is ANYBODY who should dictate who is allowed to do or be involved in anybody's LIVES much less our bedrooms?

In 1967, Trudeau said it first & best, "There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation."

perhaps this articles' question should be best phrased as:

who the hell should be allowed to dictate what ANYBODY does with their OWN BODY?

Legislation & controls might be suitable to prevent fraud or harmful products.

but to ask "Should big pharma be allowed in the bedroom?" is a tragically slippery slope argument...

if you can't control import of toxic toys, fraudulent BigPharma 'medicines', contaminated foods, GMO FrankenFoods...

perhaps you're being a touch selective in your arguments...

"three beats to the bar", people

Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!



BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian ~~~

We, two, form a Multitude ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cunnilingus not intercourse
Posted by: gendershaman on Sep 11, 2007 2:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the "problem" is Patriarchial (male-defined) sex as being all intercourse. Men are oppressed by this idiot system too (even as we benefit more). The myth of the "under-sexed" woman meets the "big dick man." Where is the big tongue man? Where are males rhapsodizing about cunnilingus, not intercourse (which is great for making babies; that's why the clergy focus on forbidding (encouraging) intercourse)?
Big, hard erections (or the new patch) will not necessarily address what has euphemistically been called “female sexual dysfunction.” Could it be that most of what male doctors identify as female dysfunction is women who either don’t orgasm from intercourse or for whom intercourse isn’t the “ultimate” sex act patriarchs have always insisted it to be. Instead of admitting that these women are only the latest victims of a millennia-old hoax, the needs of females have been ignored and denied.
Females’ need for clitoral stimulation (and male refusal to play a part in providing it) has been turned into a medical “condition” that women allegedly suffer from. Females who are dissatisfied because they receive insufficient pleasure from intercourse have been deemed to be “ill,” their disappointment, boredom and resentment are pathologized. In all but a tiny number of cases, they are not in need of medical intervention.
Could it be that for most females the much better “prescription” might include:
1. feeling safe, loved and not taken for granted;
2. feeling unrushed and unpressured: not feeling responsible for her partner’s pleasure (male or female) above or instead of her pleasure;
3. confidence that her partner (male or female) won’t try make her feel that she “owes” him/her sex;
4. feeling that she has the right to define her limits (what she wants or doesn’t want) and a belief that she will be listened to and taken seriously;
5. plentiful, playful, non-goal-directed foreplay;
6. being the recipient of ample tongue and/or finger stimulation;
7. possible use of dildos, vibrators or other “toys,”
is just what the doctor ordered?

Being the valued partner in a sexual interaction or relationship with some or all of these rights in place, or their other individual desires respected would effect a “Miracle Cure.” No pills are necessary.
It is a patriarchal lie that intercourse is the true “Sex,” and that all other acts which often provide females and males more pleasure, aren’t real sex. This lie, that oral sex is not sex, is thousands of years old; Bill Clinton didn’t create it, he only famously repeated and acted on it, as have hundreds of millions of other hypocritical males throughout history.
These are just my thoughts. Unlike so many men, I am not an expert on women, but just think the brainwashing that teaches women and men that intercourse is the only and best sex is the problem. And the guy who wondered how to last longer that two minutes? What part of most females don't orgasm from intercourse alone don't so many of us males understand? Don't worry about Mr. Happy, cunnilingus is why the Goddess gave us tongues.
Joe W.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cunnilingus not intercourse Posted by: quitecontrary
» RE: Cunnilingus not intercourse Posted by: Logic's Edge
» Mr. Happy has usually been so Posted by: gendershaman
» Right back at you Joe Posted by: suprmark
» Tell 'em what you would like Posted by: gendershaman
Anything but cannabis folks!
Posted by: garry minor on Sep 11, 2007 2:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that so many unproven, potentially harmful or deadly things are allowed into our system, pushed through the cracks, accepted by the public as safe, yet the safest, most useful plant on the planet kaneh bosm, cannabis, hemp, continues to be ignored and demonized by that very system.
Anything but the Truth folks!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

options
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Sep 11, 2007 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" (Coffey) believes hysterectomies should be performed only on women with life-threatening problems and not for symptoms like excessive menstrual bleeding."

I take exception to Ms. Coffey's dismissal of "excessive bleeding" as a minor or trivial problem. Having given serious consideration to having a hysterectomy after eight straight months of heavy bleeding, I know form personal experience how slim the pickings can be. I believe the solution to the over-use of hysterectomies is to increase the number of medical options a woman has instead of merely to point out the overuse of one of the only options currently available.

While I thoroughly believe that hysterectomies are done much more often than they are needed, the fact is that there are some situations -- "excessive bleeding" being among them, where there are precious few other options. Now, granted that perhaps this is because modern medicine has not given enough time and consideration to women's health issues, but there simply aren't currently very many options from which a woman can realistically choose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: options Posted by: Ames
Male Pattern BALDNESS...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Sep 11, 2007 7:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm waiting for them to discover they need another drug to counter-act the over-abundance of testosterone in women who think they need the patch...

... instead of a decent relationship with somebody who can get them off...

or a good vibrator...

Travelling to Toronto?

Good For Her is a a mindblowing co-operative sexuality shop that provides fantastic courses, resources...
for every expression of sexuality & gender.

& the *very best* toys around...

*grin*

...& on SUNDAYS, its grrrlz only...

got a hot tip on an amazing grrl-friendly educational group in your area?

maybe we should start a FaceBook group to recommend the best *educational* & wholistic sex co-operative locations...?

"I'm not just a member... I'm a long & satisfied customer!!


Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!



BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian ~~~

We, two, form a Multitude ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No more T
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Sep 12, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure who this applies to specifically.
But I find women who are into fitness and sports are generally pretty interested in sex.

But the less active, the sex drive goes down.

If your into fitness, you'll know that activity and sports naturally boosts T levels. I notice a huge difference in my sex drive if I quit working out for a month. I feel lazy, fat and not interested.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hopefully
Posted by: drblack on Sep 12, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am all for increases in womens sex drives and the number of man who are gay. This will put me as a hetero sexer in a good position.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Give it 5 years
Posted by: bodo on Sep 12, 2007 5:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody who thinks this patch is destined to be restricted to women experiencing menopause or who have had hysterectomies hasn't been paying attention to how pharmaceutical companies have operated the last 50 years.

This patch will be on non prescription drug store shelves being bought up by young men and women in no time.

They'll market it as the fair thing to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about basic biology?
Posted by: Whitecliff on Sep 12, 2007 8:13 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Biologically, women aren't supposed to be the testosterone-crazed sex maniacs and fuck fiends...that's the "man's job."

Since women have only a limited number of precious eggs and thus a limited amount of possible pregnancies in their lifetime, they are biologically hardwired as it were to be MUCH choosier and safer when it comes to sex, mating, and pregnancy.

It is the exact opposite for males. Since a normal, healthy male could theoretically father thousands of children in their lifetime if given the opportunity, their stronger sex drive corresponds to this biological possibility.

Corresondingly, men release millions of sperm per ejaculation, while women only release (under normal conditions) only 1 egg per month. Thus, as stated, women are biologically hardwired to be more 'careful' with their sexual and reproductive patterns than men.

The release of this patch is no suprise, however...women are becoming masculinized and men are becoming feminized at an alarming rate in American (and Western) culture. This is one of the reasons why Western society is in rapid decline and the future lies in Asia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about basic biology? Posted by: mike_burns
THere is some utility in older women.
Posted by: Dr_M on Sep 15, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When testosterone drops in older women, there are some advantages to replacing it (not bringing it to super-physiologic levels): improved mood, less bone loss, lower risk of breast cancer. However, I've not seen a correlation between replacing testosterone and sex drive in most of my patients, particularly for increasing it higher then normal. If it's low and a little testosterone brings it back to the normal range (which I don't do without estrogen and progesteorne), then there can be some restoration of previous function, but I've never seen any women have an _increased_ libido with testosterone, even when her levels were way over the normal range. A little whisker here or there, yes, but no sex machines.
That's not to say that some ...err... vigorous marketing can't give people the idea that testosterone patches increase libido and then people _will_ feel that they have more libido with them. After all, the largest and most powerful sex organ is the brain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement