Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

How Our Fossil Fuel Dependence Is Jeopardizing Our Healthcare System

By Dan Bednarz, Orion Magazine. Posted July 24, 2007.


Our country's dependency on oil and natural gas cannot be overstated. Nowhere is this truer than in our medical system. This means that the looming energy crisis is also a healthcare crisis.
Advertisement

The scale and subtlety of our country's dependency on oil and natural gas cannot be overstated. Nowhere is this truer than in our medical system.

Petrochemicals are used to manufacture analgesics, antihistamines, antibiotics, antibacterials, rectal suppositories, cough syrups, lubricants, creams, ointments, salves, and many gels. Processed plastics made with oil are used in heart valves and other esoteric medical equipment.

Petrochemicals are used in radiological dyes and films, intravenous tubing, syringes, and oxygen masks. In all but rare instances, fossil fuels heat and cool buildings and supply electricity. Ambulances and helicopter "life flights" depend on petroleum, as do personnel who travel to and from medical workplaces in motor vehicles. Supplies and equipment are shipped -- often from overseas -- in petroleum-powered carriers. In addition there are the subtle consequences of fossil fuel reliance.

A recently retired doctor informs me, "In orthopedics we used to set fractures mostly by feel and knowing the mechanics of how the fractures were created. I doubt that many of the present orthopedists could do a good job if you took away their [energy-powered] fluoroscope or X-ray."

Reprint Notice:
This article appears in the May/June 2007 issue of Orion magazine, 187 Main Street, Great Barrington, MA 01230, 888/909-6568, ($40/year for 6 issues). Subscriptions are available online: www.orionmagazine.org.

Despite this enormous vulnerability, public discussions of health care routinely ignore the prospect of peak oil. The proposed reforms, which seek to cover more people while holding down escalating costs, amount to little more than fiscal maneuvers. They take no notice of ecological resource constraints that will set limits on our ability to give people access to medical care.

The coming scarcity of fossil fuels, on top of inflationary costs in medicine (the prices of oil and natural gas are approximately four times what they were in 1999 and rising) and the expenses of treating Baby Boomers (a cohort twice the size of its predecessor), could overwhelm a medical system already in crisis.

We can avoid collapse, however, by reducing medicine's present consumption of energy and creating a health-care system that reflects our actual relationship to resources. Ironically, peak oil can be a catalyst for creating a health-care system that is cost-effective, ecologically sustainable, and congruent with a democratic social ethos.

At present we have a tiered health-care system. At the top is a Ferrari model of care that reflects our affluence, fascination with technology, and extravagance. Ferrari care has made possible the treatment of rare life-threatening diseases and expensive procedures like organ transplants, but it has also been used for esoteric and often redundant testing and vanity procedures such as botox injections. At the bottom is a jalopy model serving over 50 million un- and underinsured Americans who very often receive no treatment, defer treatment until their condition cannot be ignored, or face economic ruin when they seek adequate care.

If the two tiers persist after peak oil, they will eventually be preserved by force -- armed guards at gated medical facilities -- for the few able to pay, while the rest of Americans are relegated to the jalopy and faced with overt rationing, triage, and curtailment of medical care. Such an outcome would be an overt contravention of democratic values -- most Americans tell pollsters they believe that health care is a human right, not a privilege awarded those with higher income.

What then should we do? The best democratic option is to replace both the Ferrari and the jalopy with a Honda. The post-peak Honda health-care model will of necessity operate with fewer overall resources and less energy than today's health-care system, and at lower cost. But it need not result in poorer quality of care.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: health care, oil, medicine

Dan Bednarz is a health-care consultant in Pittsburgh. He is working to build a broad-based consortium on energy, climate, and the future of health care.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Oil isn't running out because of medical use
Posted by: edith on Jul 24, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt we are running out of petroleum because of medical uses like drug manufacture, uses of plastics, etc. Transportation and energy. It is absurd to treat specialized use of petroleum for health in the same category as gasoline. The latter eventually needs to be replaced for a variety of reasons, peak oil(if that exists) being only one. Pollution and global warming can't be affected by the manufacture of health care products to any degree comaparable to transportation products and fuels.

This article was an artificial attempt to be clever by linking the energy crisis to our problems in health care. I did like the Honda model of health care the author discusses, but discarding plastic medical products or petroleum based medication are hardly necessary for the health care business to operate like a service and not like a gouging monopoly. Let's focus our efforts to limit petroleum and carbon uses on real problem areas rather than relatively unimportant areas like health care:Conservation efforts should focus primarily on transportation and production of energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good!
Posted by: heid on Jul 24, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sounds like the best thing that could happen to our so-called health care system. This system does far more harm than good. We've exchanged long term degenerative disease for "protection" from routine childhood illnesses that were once simply expected, but are now feared because the medical system has taught us to fear them. Antibiotics, though wonderful under limited circumstances, have bred super bugs and also lead to degenerative illness.

The use of petrochemicals in growing our so-called food, transporting it, and even in the food itself has resulted in further deterioration of our health through a combination of outright poison and loss of nutrition.

The real issue is that humans have used petroleum to separate us from the natural world so much that we don't even realize we're killing not only the rest of the world, but ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» From an MD... Posted by: mjabele
» hat did you expect Posted by: gellero
» RE: From an MD... Posted by: heid
» RE: From an MD... Posted by: Pirate1
And why does Alternet continue to IGNORE the real solutions?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 24, 2007 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before you start blaming us real solution advocates for everything, why not ask yourselves the very question, why all doom and gloom and why no going on the offensive? Of course Big Oil is destroying our healthcare but 70 years ago, Big Oil and Big Pharma joined forces along with the vested business interests to ban hemp. The Left allowed the "Right" to get away with it too ! Hemp was not the only natural cure to be forced off the market as this led the SLIPPERY SLOPE to doing away with natural cures and slowing shackling America to being dependent on petroleum manufactured drugs. Not only has the War on Drugs been lost but so has the War on Poverty and the War on Terror if you can call any of these wars that. People, trace your steps and wake up ! You've been Orwellianized for 70 years !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs made from petroleum
Posted by: DrSuess on Jul 24, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone remember the old term of scorn for “junky” medicines- snake oil? Well it turns out that snake oil is petroleum. In Pennsylvania, the oil was so close to the surface, that it ran down into the rivers- and was used for “medicine” by allopathic doctors. These are the guys who also used to use bleeding and leaches. It surprises people to find out that modern medicine comes from this part of 19th century medicine. Rockefeller (the oil baron) sent people around the country in the early part of the last century, and made all other medicine illegal. Everyone had to use his “snake oil” medicines. The herbs, that were petroleum’s competitors were banned.
I doubt that oil running out will be caused by medical use of electricity or oil in the pills they prescribe. However, why are we using this “artificial” stuff instead of healthy natural plants for our medicines.
This article brings up the whole idea of how artificial everything in the modern medical arena has become.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Drugs made from petroleum Posted by: mgmyers79
» IGNORANCE Posted by: gellero
» RE: IGNORANCE Posted by: maxpayne
» The reason... Posted by: bob t
This is no surprise
Posted by: Trazom on Jul 24, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Petroleum is used in the manufacturing process of hundreds of thousands of household, industrial, and medical "things" all over the planet. It is not just the healthcare industry that stands to lose as the wells begin to dry up (if and when they do). It is literally EVERYTHING we know.

Anything that needs to be transported great distances, which means pretty much our entire food supply, is in jeopardy. Not only will the food be more expensive due to increased transportation costs, but it will also be hurt as the source of petroleum based herbicides, fertilizers, and pesticides begins to dwindle, leading to lower yields of consumables. All the plastic crap at Walmart will begin to cost more, and soon even that place will be too expensive to shop at (this despite some of the lowest wages in retail industry and rock bottom prices, meaning there is nothing more they can to do absorb the price shocks). Cost of electricity will surely go up too. All that heavy machinery that extracts the coal from the earth must run on something, right? How about the impact on the textile industry? Will all those clothing machines cost more to make? And they will still need electricity as well to make your jeans and shirts.

I understand why the author selected the medical industry for this article, but if you think about it the larger issue should be about the impact of price increases and scarcity of oil on our entire way of life, with medical products being just one area out of many, because oil undercuts just about everything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is no surprise Posted by: solrev
Hemp! Hemp! Hemp! Kaneh bosm!
Posted by: garry minor on Jul 24, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 1930's Henry Ford built and fueled a car with hemp. It's plastic panels ten times stronger than steel. In 1937, the first drug czar Harry Anslinger, with the Dupont, Hearst, and other corporations that controlled the media, successfully demonized the most useful plant on the planet. Canvas is Dutch for cannabis. For thousands of years all ships sails, lamp oil, cloth, and many medicines were made with it. Today, all paper, plastics, paints, varnishes, textiles, pressed board, and many other building products can be made with environmentally friendly hemp. In 1938 Popular Mechanics wrote that it was the most desirous crop, and will grow without fertilizer, herbicides, or pesticides to foul the soil and water, and in soil other crops won't. It is ten times more efficient than corn for producing ethanol. There are reported to be over 25,000 products that can be made with Earth friendly hemp. Few people know that petroleum based synthetics originated from cellulose based technology. It is cleaner and will be less expensive than petroleum, cotton, and timber based products. The hempseed is also the most nutritious thing you can eat. Our Government actually stockpiles it as a strategic food source (executive order#12919), yet we are denied it's use today. Used as livestock feed it could replace the need for hormones and remnants that cause American beef to be banned in Europe. These additives are believed responsible for BSE's in our food chain which have been linked to plaque buildups and mental deterioration in humans. In the 1980's it was discovered that you and I have cannabinoid receptors in our body! Cannabis has actually been found to promote new brain cell growth and destroy tumors. In Canada and Europe it is being found helpful with Alzheimers, MS, epilepsy, autism, migraine, chronic pain, arthritis, depression, glaucoma, obesity, Parkinsons, Huntingtons, Tourettes, Crohns disease, and more. For some insipid reason our own FDA doesn't want us to test it yet in the U.S.A. They would prefer that we didn't even know it existed. Wonder why?
In 1936, Sula Benet, a Polish Anthropologist discovered that in the original Hebrew of the Old Testament the word 'kaneh bosm' had been translated as calamus or fragrant cane by the Greeks when they first rendered the Books in the 3rd century BC. Benet claimed through her research and etymological comparison that the correct translation is cannabis. In 1980 the Hebrew Institute of Jerusalem confirmed her claim that 'kaneh bosm' is indeed cannabis.
In Exodus 30:23 God instructs Moses to use 250 shekels of 'kaneh bosm' in the oil to anoint all Kings, Priests, and Prophets, for all generations to come, including Jesus and today! The title Christ/Messiah means literally 'anointed', covered in oil. Kaneh is also listed as an incense tree in Song of Songs 4:14. The mistake was repeated in Isaiah 43:24, Jeremiah 6:20, and Ezekiel 27:19. There are 141 references to anointing and 145 for burning incense in the Bible.
We really have nothing to fear, the answer has been with us all the time, only hidden. The only way that this world will ever, ever, change is when our eyes have been opened and we recognize our association with the Plant of Truth, the Tree of Life, KANEH BOSM, CANNABIS, HEMP!
FOOD, FUEL, SHELTER, MEDICINE, PLEASURE, SPIRITUALITY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old story; same old song
Posted by: willymack on Jul 24, 2007 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The research that could free us fom petroleum use for ANYTHING is being subdued by the stranglehold the energy industries and the rest of the neothugs have on us. It's probably going to take another Theodore Roosevelt to break that stranglehold. One person of this calibre is all it would take, as it's happened before. Who's that person? Who knows?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When I saw the title,
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jul 24, 2007 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought the article would be about the poisons (uranium,
thorium, lead, arsenic, mercury, etc) that coal burning puts
into our air.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ask a worried nurse!
Posted by: lisah on Jul 24, 2007 2:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article really hits home. I've been in the field of hospital nursing for 15 years and the amount of disposable plastic equipment that i've used would fill a landfill. Hospitals will be in so much trouble when oil becomes scarcer. Most of what we use these days is disposable and we have few alternatives. For example, a patient needing an IV pain med every 2 hours will need , during a 8 hour shift, 4 pairs of gloves, 8 plastic syringes (med then saline flush), 8 plastic lined alcohol swab packets and of course 4 plastic vials of medicine. Thats just for pain meds only, not all the rest of the care requiring disposibles to avoid cross contamination. We can't even use natural latex gloves anymore as so much of the population (staff and patients) is allergic or at least sensitive to latex. one can't sterilise plastics properly, and yet as far as I can tell, nothing is being done to prepare for peak oil, such as returning to reusable autoclaveable equipment. I've still got 30 years till retirement, its going to be interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bigger Picture Off The Starboard Bow
Posted by: NumberSix on Jul 25, 2007 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great piece, yes, but it misses the bigger picture: An oil-based society is set to implode, and not just with medicines.

Oil is in everything imaginable. Food! Why doesn't anyone mention how many calories of oil go into each calorie we take into our mouths? That alone should scare some, you'd think!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Jul 26, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some years ago, I put out the question: Who will triage the use of petroleum in coming years? Will the manufacturers of completely unnecessary products be able to out-lobby medical providers? Will we continue to have plenty of Barbie Dolls and the usual mall schlock while hospitals scrounge around for tubing and salves? Something to that effect. The point was to get people to think about the inevitable shortages of products based on petroleum. Really, with the triple crises of global warming, the end of oil, and the coming economic crash in the US, you'd think someone would realize that we cannot allow critical and increasingly dear resources to be wasted on gee-gaws, but so far corporate profits rule, and not a peep from any of our "far-seeing" reps in Congress. Where are the thinkers? Ignored by the media, most likely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cart before the horse
Posted by: Watercolors on Aug 2, 2007 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Environmental effects of accessing, burning and utilizing petroleum, uranium, and coal are chief causes of illness. When we move beyond the coal/petrochemical/nuclear age we will see vast improvements in physical and mental health. Problem is that we won't progress beyond today's environmental nightmare until there's no more profit to be reaped at the expense of our health.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]