Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health & Wellness

The Politics and PR of Cervical Cancer

By Judith Siers-Poisson, PR Watch. Posted July 16, 2007.


Many women, including the author, have been affected by cervical cancer or Human Papillomavirus (HPV) at some point in their lives. Part one of a series of articles examining HPV and Gardasil -- the facts, the hype, and what Merck stands to gain.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

HPV is rampant throughout the world, and the U.S. is no exception. It is estimated that up to 20 million people in the U.S. are currently infected with HPV -- men as well as women. It is not surprising, therefore, that Gardasil has burst onto the national stage as the latest 'wonder' vaccine. Manufactured by Merck, Gardasil is the first vaccine available that can prevent 4 strains of HPV, which is a leading cause of cervical cancer and pre-cancerous cervical conditions.

In nearly every state in the U.S. there is a legislative push to make the HPV vaccine mandatory for middle school aged girls, with catch-up clauses to cover girls that have passed that age but are not yet sexually active. Given the anxiety of most people about cancer and the number of people infected with HPV, it is not surprising that what is touted as the first vaccine against cancer has been largely greeted with acclaim. But despite having been affected personally, I became concerned by the headlong rush to not only approve the vaccine, but to mandate it for middle-school aged girls. It is also worrisome that a vaccine may give a false sense of security, which could lead to a decline in the very reliable and proven diagnostic tools available, including Pap tests. Decisions affecting millions of young women should not be made lightly, and certainly not without examining the marketing, PR, and profit motives of a corporation like Merck.

HPV and Cervical Cancer: Just the facts, Ma'am

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as many as 50 percent of sexually active men and women become infected with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) at some point in their lives. Because the virus is so pervasive, by age 50, at least 80 percent of women will have acquired genital HPV infection. It is estimated that each year an additional 6.2 million Americans becomes infected by one of the strains of HPV. It is important to note, however, that only a few strains of HPV actually cause cervical cancer.

Despite how ubiquitous the virus is, basic knowledge about HPV and its link to cervical cancer is sadly lacking in the U.S. population. According to the 2005 National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends survey, only 38.3% of U.S. women surveyed said that they had heard of Human Papillomavirus or HPV. In addition, less than 50% thought that HPV caused cervical cancer.

HPV is significant not only because of the high infection rates among the population. HPV infection can affect fertility, can cause the sexually transmitted disease (STD) genital warts, and some strains can lead, in rare cases according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to cervical cancer. The CDC goes on to say that "Most people who become infected with HPV will not have any symptoms and will clear the infection on their own." That is to say, without any treatment, many infections are addressed by the body's own immune system. (The National Cancer Institute's survey noted that nearly 80% of women mistakenly believed that the body could not resolve the infection without treatment.)

For those whose bodies are unable to counter the infection without assistance, a Pap test provides a reliable method of detection, which, coupled with appropriate treatment, has drastically reduced the mortality rate of cervical cancer patients. The National Institutes of Health points out that HPV does not lead directly to cervical cancer but causes cell abnormalities, or dysplasia, which can over time develop into cancer. It is a slow progression, and "this pre-cancerous condition can be detected by a Pap smear and is 100% treatable." In addition, 92% of women are alive 5 years after a cervical cancer diagnosis if the cancer was kept from spreading outside of the cervical area.

So why is cervical cancer still an issue for women? In the developing world, lack of access to healthcare and routine tests like the Pap smear means that infections and early pre-cancerous conditions are not detected, and if and when women are diagnosed, it is with advanced, invasive cervical cancer that may have metastasized to other parts of the body. In addition, other cervical cancer risk factors, such as becoming sexually active at an early age and giving birth to several children, are more common for women in developing countries.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: women, hpv

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ever heard of Professor Frazer? Of course not, you're American
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Jul 16, 2007 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder why this writer didn't see fit to publish in her story, the research, researchers and country this astounding discovery has come from.
Oh, that's right, he wasn't an American. Can't mention it if it isn't an American discovery now can we.

"Australia has a brilliant international record in health and medical research, with seven out of ten Nobel Prizes awarded to laureates in Australia being in the field of physiology or medicine. Our medical researchers are our true heroes, demonstrating the powers of curiosity, initiative and perseverance, while rarely seeking public accolades or the public spotlight.

Australian Professor Frazer’s team developed a vaccine against cervical cancer that could save many thousands of lives across Australia and around the world. The vaccine works by protecting women against infection by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Professor Frazer was named Australian of the Year in 2006"

Read the extraordinary lengths Frazer went to before publishing his findings, and then criticise if you wish. You will have to remove the gap...it won't let me post the full Web addie here unless I add a gap.

http://nhmrc.gov.au/news/newsmakers/ newsmakers_07/research_history.htm

Vaccination has been going on here in Aussie now for almost a year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And what is your point? Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: What are you talking about? Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» RE: What are you talking about? Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» RE: What are you talking about? Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Well... Posted by: Habaro
Cervical Cancer? Source an infected male HPV carrier
Posted by: odcherenow on Jul 16, 2007 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cervical Cancer, only found in women, is sourced to HPV, most often carried by HPV infected males. So basic, this information is seldom transmitted. Look to uncircumcised men particularly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not vaccinate males first?
Posted by: odcherenow on Jul 16, 2007 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, I forgot the most important part.
Since males carry HPV vaccinate them.
It is a poor decision to mandate vaccination of your breeding stock. And especially with an untried drug. Remember Hormone Replacement Therapy and Thalodimide babies?
Think of "The Handmaidens Tale". Wake up, women.
Let's not allow these drug companies to do this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why not vaccinate males first? Posted by: Nedtheredhead
“I Eat More Pussy than Cervical Cancer”...
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jul 16, 2007 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...was the caption on a T shirt I saw on a hot 20 something blond in Seattle.

Just thought I’d share.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vaccines--biggest scam going
Posted by: Ruby on Jul 16, 2007 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check it out:

http://www.nvic.org/Diseases/HPV/HPVHOME.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep pumping
Posted by: snowhound on Jul 16, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
those vaccines into your blood. For some reason, people never seem to think that vaccines just like drugs have side effects. Vaccines are the only substance that have killed hundreds of children, but are still regarded as totally safe. If vaccines were drugs they all would have been pulled of the market long ago. I personally choose to work with naure and not against it. A strong immune system can conquer any virus. Theirs no proof that the vaccine will prevent cancer. It may cause an increase by people not getting tested because they think their immune to cervical cancer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Keep pumping Posted by: kelt65
» RE: Keep pumping Posted by: snowhound
Gardasil and men
Posted by: Boomerang on Jul 16, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have several comments.

First, I can't believe that there are comments on this page already (8:15 AM here) stating that vaccines are a scam. That's total, utter nonsense. Tell that garbage to all the people who have never developed measles, mumps, chicken pocks (one I wish I'd gotten to skip in my lifetime, scarred me up fairly badly), all the kids who will never suffer from polio. Tell people that vaccines don't work when humanity used them to utterly eradicate an entire disease so thoroughly that nowadays, we don't even bother to vaccinate against it (smallpox). When was the last time you heard of a child dieing of rubella? Scarlet Fever? Vaccines work, and anyone saying differently is frankly, a moron.

Enter Gardasil. It's a fantastic vaccine, and I think Merck is absolutely right to push hard for people to use it. Of course, they also stand to make mountains of cash off of it, but since they spent the money to develop it, I'm fine with that. They should be rewarded for their efforts. The link between HPV and cervical cancer is documented, and now we have a vaccine for HPV. But I think it's a horrendous disservice to label Gardasil the "cervical cancer vaccine."

HPV is also the #1 cause of penile cancer in men, and only advertising this as a magical bullet against cervical cancer ignored the completely obvious fact that men can catch HPV as well, and it gives us cancer too. I wish Merck was putting this information more in the public. Not only does it do their marketing a disservice, it also doesn't make sense to only vaccinate half of a population against an STD. Vaccinating only women is ridiculous. It may be a little too new to make it mandatory for everyone, but getting the shot is certainly a damn good idea.

And frankly, if I had children, I'd be glad to shell out $120 (the reality is that it costs much more if you don't have insurance) to protect them from this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poor baby got a scar Posted by: snowhound
» RE: Poor baby got a scar Posted by: Ruby
» RE: Gardasil and men Posted by: morticia
» Vaccines Posted by: fanny666
Left Unsaid
Posted by: vikrez on Jul 16, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, though several things were left unsaid. Firstly, it is not known that there are non-HPV causes of cervical cancer. The author implies that there are. Most scientists believe all cervical cancer is caused by HPV. Secondly, to eliminate HPV men would need to get vaccinated as well--especially since HPV can be transmitted even if a man wears a condom. Also, vaccine mandates do not include the group of men most at risk for HPV, gay men. Not including men is an economic consideration, not a medical one. Lastly, the Cervarix vaccine guards against serotypes of HPV not covered by the Gardisil vaccine. If we had a healthcare system where corporate profits weren't the primary consideration--a combination of the two vaccines would be the best medicine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A lot of misinformation out there
Posted by: lahlah on Jul 16, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is no wonder that many people are so misinformed about HPV. First of all, until recently, it was rarely talked about. Second, the information about HPV has gotten better over the last 15-20 years but a lot of the information on the internet is out of date. When I first contracted HPV in 1989, the doctor told me that I would eventually clear the virus but could risk developing cervical cancer later on. Either he did not know or just did not tell me that there were different strains that produced different deleterios effects. Ten years later when I did indeed have a negative PAP smear, the practicioner in charge did not even mention to me that the cause was probably a different strain of HPV than the one I'd had in 1989. If you look online, you will find sites that say that HPV cannot be cleared. Fortunately, an up-to-date clinic (Westover Heights Clinic in Portland, OR) was able to provide me with some information that made sense of all this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey the good news is
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 16, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of all that nonsense about protection and vaccination - you could just not have sex in the first place. You know like the Republicans do.

Anyway on a sort-of related note, those of you who blog your own stuff may like to know submissions for the latest Carnival of the Feminists close tomorrow right here. Please nominate good writing if you know where there is some, we would love to mention it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush to vaccinate
Posted by: bookwoman on Jul 16, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have an eight year old granddaughter. When all the rush began to vacinate young girls with Gardisil, my blood ran cold. Need I mention Hormone Replacement Therapy and the way doctors made you feel guilty if you didn't take it. I kept on refusing and changed doctors once because of a particularly strident advocate. Oh, and don't forget Stibesterol. That was a pill which stopped miscarriages. Unfortunately, it left the female children and some of the males with a tendency toward genital Cancers. We will live with that for another fifty years. Also, this drug seems to cause a 30% higher chance of breast cancer in the mothers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HPV is the most underrated STI
Posted by: kelt65 on Jul 16, 2007 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a big issue for men as well, but it is not cancer causing in men to my knowledge, just causes those icky warts (certain strains). Does gardasil inoculate against all strains of HPV, or just the ones that cause cancer in women?

Don't forget it's generally male carriers that give it to women in the first place. Most don't even know, unless they've broken out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

J Schmidt, PA-C
Posted by: schmidtzl on Jul 18, 2007 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read with interest the series of articles on Merck, Guardasil, and government. I note that there is no mention of the number of physicians on the vaccine advisory committee and also on the merck payroll--speakers bureau.
You can start with Amy Middleton at Baylor. www.bcm.tmc.edu.
Secondly, There is no mention of the NNT (nuimber needed to treat). According to my estimates ( and I am no math whiz), Merck would make multiple millions before the first case of Cervical cancer is prevented.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]