Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Five Eco-Diets Get Put to the Test

By Tyghe Trimble, Conscious Choice. Posted June 30, 2007.


It pays to be wary of fad diets -- even if they’re in the name of the planet. We put five to the test.
Advertisement

I am your run-of-the mill vegetarian. I started up after a college cafeteria gave me dry Salisbury steak with a side of food poisoning, kept it going for a girl, then firmed up a deepening veggie philosophy with some essential reading. I stuck with it from there because I’m healthy as hell, think there is little more appealing than fresh arugula salad, and, really, who would doubt a diet promoted by Einstein?

But these days, regular old vegetarianism -- which 10 percent of Americans claim to be, by the way -- is just one jumping point for molding a healthy dietary conscience. As meals today come complete with a carbon footprint, more of us are eating with the health of the watershed, soil and sustainable farming in mind. Everyone’s favorite (albeit omnivorous) food guru Michael Pollan said it best with his sage advice for healthy eating: “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.”

Still, like any new dietary trend, sustainable diets are subject to extremes, as well as their own fair share of loopholes and problems (think Atkins and a bunless triple-cheeseburger with bacon). I decided to see for myself what’s on the menu for the vegan, for the 100-mile-dieter, for the raw foodist, the slow food advocate, and the strictly organic consumer, noting how these diets hold up beyond theory and in surreptitious practice (i.e. is that really organic?). To aid my assessment of each diet’s feasibility, sustainability, health and strain on the wallet, I attempted to practice each method for one week.

Don’t Panic, It’s Organic

Since J.I. Rodale began promoting organic farming in the 1940s, “organic” has come to mean opposition to the practices of industrial farming. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has now officially defined “organic” as, in short, food grown without pesticides, chemical fertilizers or sewage sludge, free from irradiation, genetic modification or -- for animal-products -- growth hormones or antibiotics. A USDA organic seal has been in existence under five years, but the time-consuming process of certification has limited the amount of farmers whose products carry the seal -- even if many (often smaller) farmers are practicing organic methods. This is bad news for me since I’m limiting my diet to USDA approved organics. Let the search begin…

Price: Quite pricey. Add $0.50 to $1.00 per item if you want to upgrade to organic. My grocery bill for the week went up a whopping $30.00.

Prep Time: Factor in conscientious label-reading, asking questions and spending quality time with a Sharpie, crossing off bogus terms like “all natural” from labels. Here’s a cheat sheet: “USDA Organic” is made with 100 percent organic ingredients, just “Organic” means ingredients are 95 percent organic and “made with organic ingredients” must be over 70 percent organic. “All natural” means absolutely nothing.

Health: Organics guarantee no pesticides or harsh, petrol-based fertilizers, with a growing finding of health benefits.

Sustainability: When farmers are held to organic standards, the surrounding environment benefits. Still, a simple meal could log a hefty carbon footprint. My organic enchilada recipe went on one heck of Spring Break before arriving on my plate -- including Mexico, Chile and Argentina. When local farmers nearby have fresh tomatoes, it’s going to be hard to argue that those hundreds of gallons of jet fuel are worth the guarantee of a pesticide-free salsa.

In the Garden of Vegan

The sustainable vegan diet focuses a critical eye on the conventional raising of livestock, a practice that is unsustainable and, many vegans believe, antiquated and cruel. The ecological problems stem from animal feedlot operations (AFOs). “By definition,” reads a passage on the Environmental Protection Agency’s website, “AFOs produce large amounts of waste in small areas. For example, a single dairy cow produces approximately 120 pounds of wet manure per day. The waste produced per day by one dairy cow is equal to that of 20-40 people.” Meat and other animal products require gads of energy and water to produce. Mass-production of these products includes antibiotics and questionable feed practices, and leaves us with a whole lot of waste to contaminate the rest of our food chain. The vegan’s answer? Cut out the animal products.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: 100-mile diet, organic, vegan, slow food, raw diet, vegetarian

Tyghe Trimble is a researcher and reporter for Popular Mechanics magazine in New York.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
U.C. Berkeley's carbon foot calculator takes organic into account
Posted by: Rune on Jun 30, 2007 12:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This carbon footprint calculator is fairly accurate and does a good job of showing how small the impact of organic food choices are when most of our food is traveling half a continent's distance, often in refrigerated containers, after being processed in many energy intensive ways, on average.

It is not immediately obvious how to use the calculator, but the secret is that you need to double click on the data entry fields to input your own figures. Try it and see who you stack up and what other choices you could make might mean in terms of your own carbon footprint. Food is certainly a biggie if it is store bought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eat fresh, learn how to cook, and get lots of veg and fruit
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 30, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you do this you can eschew the pay cheque killing trips to Whole Foods. People look for gimmicks when what you should do is very simple: buy nice fresh food, put together a menu, cook it well, and sit down with your loved ones and eat it.

Stop all the short-cuts. A healthy salad doesn't take long to make, a piece of grilled fish takes minutes, homemade soup no more than half an hour. Every lie about convenience foods is just that: a lie. You can find a healthy equivalent that will take even less time to make. The key is learning how to cook and prepare meals. Do that, and you will never fear the kitchen again and you will look and feel healthy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What assurance do I have as to what "organic" means other than "more expensive"?
Posted by: ateo on Jun 30, 2007 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been to Whole Foods once and, as expected, everything was more expensive than a traditional grocery store. My question to you is what makes the "organic" natural peanut butter at Whole Foods different from the natural peanut butter I can buy for 35% of the cost at BJ's wholesale? Also what assurance do I have that these supposedly "organic" foods are genuine?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A quick word on 'natural' Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: A quick word on 'natural' Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Good to know Posted by: ateo
Get a goat-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jun 30, 2007 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grow a vegetable garden. This is not only free organic food-but exercise.
Get some chickens-for bug eating and manure and free organic eggs.
Get a goat. Weed eating and goat milk and cheese.

The problem of food will not change-until we change the way we live.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get a goat- Posted by: Rune
» RE: Get a goat- Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: Get a goat- Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Get a goat-owleyes Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: Get a goat-owleyes Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Get a goat-owleyes Posted by: WitchyNy
» Desert...water? Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Get a goat-owleyes Posted by: Robba29
» Sacramento Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Sacramento Posted by: Robba29
» witchy- cats aren't eco... Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: witchy- cats aren't eco... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» FatMan Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: FatMan Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Thanks...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jun 30, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks...

I'm definitely a junk-food vegan. Your statement about coke, french fries, and vegan cake is not much of a stretch. I know lots of junk food vegans but I don't know anyone who drinks coke.
That's a bit corporate for most of us. LOL. Oh, right, wait...Odwalla is owned by Coke, right? So buying an Odwalla is buying a Coke, right?

Point well taken. But the vegans I know are not vegans-for-health as much as we are vegan to avoid animal slaughter. For example, veal cows are a product of the dairy industry. So when we buy milk/cheese, we are buying veal.

I do think vegan is better than lacto/ovo (milk-egg) vegetarian diet because less animals suffer in the process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cruelty-free Posted by: vasumurti
» vasumurti - THANKS! Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Thanks... Posted by: jenergy
Eat well and Enjoy!
Posted by: alternetrose on Jun 30, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are a little shy on talent or just don't know how to fix great meals, I've found a wonderful website that is very helpful. The chef explains how it doesn't have to cost a lot to eat well and it need not take much time or effort. His demonstration clips are of simple and healthy recipes. The site is free and with his guidance you'll be on your way! The site is foodwishes.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Diabetic Spin on Diet
Posted by: StuartH on Jun 30, 2007 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our bodies are being carpet bombed by a sugar industry using our tax dollars to heavily subsidize an approach to food that is not only not sustainable it is literally killing us.

When you receive a diagnosis that you are diabetic, your angle of view on the whole diet and food paradigm changes. It is a big, Ah Hah.

Probably everyone ought to be encouraged to look at diet from the sugar and carb counter's viewpoint.

Since the fifties, the sugar industry has found more way to sell sugar by creating more forms of it and putting into more products. There is even sugar in french fries. Apparently, the sugar and salt combination is the basis for most of us being attracted to potato chips.

This sugar and carb intake is the basis for many health problems that are actually all the same problem. Heart disease comes about after years of ignoring the effects of sugar and carb and fat intake. Cardiovascular disease, which means that other parts of the body may go before the heart does, is related to food intake. Diabetes may be caused by the pancreas giving out under heavy assault by a flood of sugar and carb forms in food.

Given the choices, even in a Whole Foods type store, and the propaganda that is subsidized by a combination of tax dollars and by a concentration on profit over health, healthy eating is like swimming upstream against the tide.

The connection with the health care side of this is that profit is being made to make people sick and then profit is being made to run health care as a profit making corporate enterprise.

Something has to change. One way to foment a quiet sort of rebellion: eat truly organic food - local when possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USDA organic ain't that great
Posted by: agenas_phoenix on Jun 30, 2007 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
actually....

USDA organic standards state that products sold with the USDA organic symbol have to have *at least* 95% organic ingredients--meaning *up to* 5% can be not organic--even certain synthetics are allowed to be used as ingredients labeled as "organic". USDA organic produce and animal products are questionable at best --farmland can be called organic after 3 yrs even if for example 3 yrs ago it was a chemically-intensive conventional operation that utilized sludge and pesticides which are laden with horrid chemicals and toxic heavy metals. Also, we get "organic" food from places where enduring toxic chemicals like DDT were used more recently and up till this day, and they say, "three years should do it"? I don't think so.

Other products labeled just "Organic" depend on the what kind of standards that specific certification carries. It could be CCOF (California Certified Organic Farmers) certified or Oregon Tilth certified, for example, which are much stricter than USDA standards, in that 100% truly organic ingredients are required in packaged goods, and are stricter in regards to what is viewed as "organic" plant and animal treatment. But please do your own research and find out for yourselves!

about allowed synthetic substances in "organic" food: http://www.ams.usda.gov/NOP/NOP/standards/ListReg.html

about USDA organic production and handling standards:
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/FactSheets/ProdHandE.html

agenas_phoenix@hotmail.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CNG: the exception that proves the rule
Posted by: elderwoman.org on Jul 1, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that the term 'natural' is often meaningless, especially when used by the large food corporations as a marketing ploy. But there is at least one very important exception. That's when it appears on a CNG label.
CNG stands for 'Certified Naturally Grown'. It is a low-cost, grassroots alternative for small-scale producers who cannot afford the high cost of 'official' USDA certification. CNG is a not-for-profit organization. Its members produce their food to strict standards and all food sold under the CNG label is totally equal in nutritional value to the USDA certified stuff. What's more, it is also locally distributed rather than being shipped hundreds of miles.
There are CNG farmers all over the USA and they are folks who care deeply about clean, local food, sustainability and the environment.
So in this context, the word 'natural' really does mean something. Check out the CNG website, look out for the label and spread the word.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The (forgotten?) Art of Food Preservation
Posted by: starbird on Jul 1, 2007 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many folks can, dry, or otherwise preserve peak-season produce for year-round enjoyment...all my ancestors, for example :-)

Those ripe, juicy peaches bought last summer during peak peach-season at the local farmer's market for only $7/bushel and canned in own juice in reusable glass jars sure were delicious all Winter; the jars of marinara made with lowest-price-of-the-year peak-season vine-ripened tomatoes and fresh basil...

For me, abundant and thus cheap at the Local Farmer's Market is the sign it's time to preserve some for later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The (forgotten?) Art of Food Preservation Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Food industry
Posted by: Falang on Jul 1, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like I wrote before take a can of soup made in America (the continent) and read the label you will find that they dump a lot of chemical, salt and sugar, in fact it’s hard to find one without sugar. Buy a can of soup made in Europe and read the label you will not find any chemical, no sugar and a balanced quantity of salt.
Now it should less expensive for the company who make soup in America not to put those chemical and big load of sugar and salt but welcome to the make believe food market.
They put those chemical for the colour and consistency and they put a lot of salt and sugar (and sometime fat) because those are supposedly addictive so they think people will become addict to your product.
Butter is a example of that, everyone is thinking that butter have the same colour all year long but in reality the butter change colour with the season and the diet of the cow so in the make believe food industry they put chemical dye (they call that food colorant) in the butter to have a uniform colour all year long. Does your body need chemical dye to live? Can those chemical dye harm you?
In the European Union countries were they eat better with less chemical and almost no GM food and where the law about food are very strict and enforce the stomach cancer is down 45% between 1980 and 1999 and the trend continue to go down. That should ring a bell do you think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slow food
Posted by: YogiBear on Jul 1, 2007 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice article. Informative, and not at all preachy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raw food headaches
Posted by: dover23 on Jul 2, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The headaches and digestive issues are normal and due to the detox effects of the diet. This can be difficult to deal with; patience is important, and then you feel great :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eco-Eating
Posted by: CyberBrook on Jul 29, 2007 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

For healthy and sustainable food choices with their environmental consequences, please visit Eco-Eating at http://www.brook.com/veg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]