Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Health & Wellness

Michael Moore Attacks the Grotesque Profit Motive of the US Health Care System

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted June 22, 2007.


Moore explains how the the obscene profits made by the CEOs of "non-profit" hospitals started with Richard Nixon in this powerful interview about his new documentary, SiCKO.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore sat down with Amy Goodman ahead of the release of his new film SiCKO. The film is a seething indictment of the US healthcare system. It focuses not on the more than 40 million people who don't have healthcare but on the 250 million who do - many of whom are abandoned by the very health insurance industry they paid into for decades. "They are getting away with murder," Moore said of the health insurance companies. "They charge whatever they want. There is no government control, and frankly we will not fix our system until we remove these private insurance companies."

Amy Goodman: Michael Moore is on the move. The Academy Award-winning filmmaker testified this week on Capitol Hill. And he's making his way to New Hampshire to challenge presidential candidates -- Democrat and Republican -- over the nation's healthcare system.

Oh, and his latest documentary, SiCKO, is being released in thousands of theaters next week. The film is a seething indictment of the US healthcare system. It focuses not on the more than 40 million people who don't have health insurance, but on the more than 250 million who do, many of whom are abandoned by the very health insurance industry they've paid into for decades.

I sat down with Michael Moore at the Tribeca Cinema here in New York, just after he'd done a sneak preview for 9/11 workers who fell ill after working in the toxic environment at Ground Zero. He was then doing a fundraiser for the Center for Justice and Democracy, a tort reform group. I began by asking Michael Moore what inspired him to make the film.

Michael Moore: Well, I actually -- I had a TV show on back in the '90s called TV Nation, and one day I just -- I thought it would be interesting to have like a race. So we sent a camera crew to an emergency room in Fort Lauderdale, a camera crew to an emergency room in Toronto, and then one to Havana. And they would each wait until someone came in with a broken arm or a broken leg. And then they were going to follow that person through and see Healthcare Olympics. And so, it was a race between the US, Canada and Cuba. And to make a long story short, Cuba won. They had the fastest care, the best care, and it cost nothing.

We turn the show in to NBC that week, and we get a call from the censor. They're not called "the censor," they're called Standards & Practices. And so, this woman calls. She's the head of Standards & Practices -- Dr. Somebody. I don't know they -- she actually had a "Dr." before her name, but I forget her last name now. But she calls, and she says, "Mike, Cuba can't win." I said, "What?" "Cuba can't win." "Well, they won. What do you mean they can't win? They won." "No, we can't say that on NBC. We can't say that Cuba won." "Well, yeah, but they won! They provided the fastest care. They were the cheapest. And the patient was happy, and the bone got fixed." "No, it's against regulations here." I said, "Oh, well, I'm not changing it."

Well, they changed it. They changed it. Two days later, when it aired, they changed it so that Canada won. And Canada didn't win. Canada almost won, but they charged the guy $15 for some crutches on the way out. So it's bugged me to this day that anybody who saw that episode, you know, where it said, you know, "and Canada won the Healthcare Olympics," and in fact it was Cuba, but that couldn't be said on NBC, because God knows what would happen.

So, anyways, I first started thinking about this issue then, and then when I had my next show, The Awful Truth, we followed a guy who had health insurance, but his health insurance company would not approve this operation he needed, which would save his life. So we took the guy to the headquarters of Humana, the HMO down in Louisville, Kentucky, took him in to see the executives there. They gave us the boot. So we went out on the lawn and conducted the man's funeral, with him present. So we had a priest and a casket and pallbearers, bagpipes and, you know, "Amazing Grace" and the whole deal. And the executives are looking down from the top floor at this and horrified this is going to air on national television. Three days later, they call and tell the guy, "We'll approve the operation." And the man is alive today.

And I thought at the time, geez, you know, a ten-minute piece, we saved a guy's life; what could we do if we did a two-hour movie? And so, that was the sort of the genesis of this, though the movie didn't end up being a bunch of stories about, you know, saving individual people's lives, because as I got into this, I figured there's a much, you know, sort of bigger story to tell about the actual system itself.

Goodman: Well, tell us about the 9/11 workers and how you got involved with all of these people who have gotten sick. We just came from one of your first showings before the premiere of the film, with 9/11 emergency responders who are sick.

Moore: Right. Well, as you know, those of us who in New York here, where, you know, since 9/11, a lot of these workers who ran down there to help on 9/11 who were not city employees or state employees, but were just volunteers -- I mean, some people got across from New Jersey and came and helped. They were maybe volunteer firefighters from New Jersey, some were EMT volunteers, and they went down there to help. Some of them stayed there for months in the recovery effort. And they got all these illnesses, respiratory illnesses and things like that, from breathing, you know, the whole, you know -- while the EPA was saying, Giuliani was saying everything's fine down there. You know, go ahead and breathe away. In fact, as we now know, it was very toxic down there. And hundreds, perhaps even thousands, have suffered as a result of the toxicity in the air at the time.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sicko

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Michael Moore finally steps up for 9/11 truth.
Posted by: johndoraemi on Jun 22, 2007 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike many in this political hemisphere (Amy Goodman included), Mr. Moore has finally acknowledged the firefighters, the explosions, the first person eyewitness accounts of demolition charges in NY on 9/11.

That should be the subject of a major article here:

"I've had a number of firefighters tell me over the years and since Fahrenheit 9/11 that they heard these explosions-- that they believe there's MUCH more to the story than we've been told. I don't think the official investigations have told us the complete truth-- they haven't even told us half the truth."
--Michael Moore, Jones Report, June 19, 2007

http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Moore -as always, is less! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Show me the FACTS!!! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Moore -as always, is less! Posted by: sebrennan
» RE: Moore -as always, is less! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Game over! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Game over! Posted by: lively56
» RE: Moore -as always, is less! Posted by: planet doomed
» Health Care! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» It wasn't an opposing view... Posted by: ReallyBearish
Michael Moore's movie has the potential to be a rallying point for people seeking
Posted by: zyxwvut on Jun 22, 2007 1:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
progressive change. The two most important indices on whether a government gives a rap about its people are how it performs in the areas of health care and education. Obviously it hasn't cared much in recent years.

But at least this film is not afraid to say what most people already know or sense: that health care here is terrible. There is a strange, artificial barrier against addressing this topic openly, a kind of anxiety that envelopes the most blatant contradictions of a society and protects them from scrutiny.

It's time that most Americans are honest with themselves about the exploitative nature of our health care system. With its balls-out, if comedic, approach (there's a fig leaf over them), SiCKO could be significant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The barriers Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: The barriers Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: The barriers Posted by: LMNOP
» Excellent points, SSegallMD Posted by: hagwind
» Thanks. Posted by: LMNOP
Michael Moore needs a new facts checker
Posted by: milox on Jun 22, 2007 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I support the idea and creation of universal health care in the United States and I'd like to see it happen in the U.S. in my lifetime. For this reason, I support Michael Moore's efforts to expose the current system in the U.S. and sincerely hope it makes a dent in the situation.

That said, Michael Moore really needs to get his facts straight regarding Kaiser Permanente, specifically "Edgar Kaiser" vs. "Henry J. Kaiser" and the history behind the organization and history. MM does himself and the movement for universal health care a big disservice by not knowing the facts or fudging.

Yes, there are problems with Kaiser Permanente but in the big scheme of things, it's a decent model for collectivism coming about through many unions. I know it's MM's job to rake muck but he needs to be careful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I jest you NOT! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: I jest you NOT! Posted by: Ian MacLeod
What would happen to everyone who works for the insurance companies
Posted by: jwc on Jun 22, 2007 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if they were ever shut down? I've yet to see a good answer to that question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I TOTALLY support Michael Moore, but UK and Canada now taking US route
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 22, 2007 3:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It pains me to watch, but while Americans are waking up to the failure of the greedy health system, the ding dongs in Canada and the UK are hurtling at break neck speed towards it. A day doesn't go by in either country where a new service isn't privatised or has its fees hiked or a greedy healthcare worker isn't helped to milk the system for all it's worth.

It is a failed strategy yet the UK and Canada think it is the way to go. In fact what would do the most to improve public health and the quality of life is, ironically, to do less. As in, provide fewer over-priced, over-drugged services, and instead make sure everyone has a public health clinic and a doctor who sees them every year and engages with them to make sure they exercise, eat well and are happy. Those three things are the most important factors in long-term health. Peddling over-priced procedures, developing a chaotic and wasteful delivery model, over-medicating people, and allowing medical elites and lobby groups to capture the health system has led to the greatest absurdity of all: people in the wealthiest societies in the world getting fatter and fatter, and suffering from a litany of ailments brought about by physical atrophy, bad food and chemical abuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right wing cutbacks? Posted by: suprmark
» RE: ight wing cutbacks? Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» A guy can change can't he? Posted by: Bobsays
Some concerns...
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 22, 2007 3:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm concerned that MM's movies function as "preaching to the choir" love festivals for progressives...and that his movies bring unneeded/additional Left vs. Right polarization.

Highlighting critical issues like the need for universal health care in an entertaining way is fine. Yet, one movie will not tear down the the brick wall of a corrupt political system which blocks efforts like providing universal coverage. Also, powerful organizations like the NRA, which was the target of MM's last movie..can come back even stronger when they're directly attacked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some concerns... Posted by: jwc
» RE: This member of the choir . . . Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Some concerns... Posted by: Shey
» RE: Some concerns... Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Some concerns... Posted by: sea4th
» RE: Some concerns... Posted by: truthseeker2006
SICKO WILL LOCK-IN HEALTH CARE REFORM AS THE DOMESTIC ISSUE THAT WILL ELECT THE NEXT US PRESIDENT
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 22, 2007 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With earlier presidential primaries and caucuses and growing bipartisanship on US Health Care reform, Moore's film SICKO will ensure that health care reform will be the domestic issue that will elect our next president.

I too am for a modified Single Payer HR 676-"Medicare for All" but with MUCH more emphasis on both individual (=behavioral change) and institutional prevention(=public health) . Implemented with fairness and compassion.

A high tech treatment oriented health care system is simply NOT economically sustainable here or in other nations especially those with aging demographics

My statement does not take away from the power that Moore's SICKO packs. It is a movie- like Gore's Inconvenient Truth- that comes along once in a while that will change our nation on an issue of profound importance.

(another Oscar for Moore in 08)

I posted my own blog piece on the film yesterday on my Critical Condition blog

Be Well,

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hillary vs. Mitt? Posted by: hagwind
Moore’s mischaracterization of Kaiser Permanente
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 22, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’m a HUGE Michael Moore fan, but like all human beings, he's not perfect.

While I’m sure “Sicko” is another masterpiece in his string of important social commentaries, Mike went overboard by equating my HMO, Kaiser Permanente, with Halliburton.

First of all, unlike Cheney’s greed-driven old company, Kaiser is a NOT-for-profit organization.

Second, from my experience over the past seven years as a Kaiser patient, the two facilities I’ve used, a KP climic in Thousand Oaks, CA, and the Kaiser hospital in nearby Woodland Hills, are nothing less than outstanding.

Since 2000, I have been treated for hypertension and possible kidney stones plus I received a hip replacement. During my visits at the KP clinic and hospital, never did I encounter an employee -- from surgeons to nurses and orderlies -- who wasn’t a caring, competent, pleasant and professional individual. Waiting time has been minimal on average and the fees more than reasonable.

Because I’m on Medicare, KP charges me NO monthly insurance fee; I only pay for services used. Last week, I had an X-ray and two doctors consolations for possible kidney stones. Total cost: $70. Total time for the X-ray and consultations in different sections of the hospital: 45 minutes. Parking fee: $1. Number of non-smiling, unfriendly KP employees I encountered: zero.

In sum, Kaiser Permanente is a model of efficiency, compassion and competency in the health care industry. To equate KP to Hallibuton is more than unfair -- it’s the worst kind of mischaracterization. But I still love Michael Moore and forgive him for the transgression -- which, I assume, was inadvertent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Chill for the Insurance Industry Posted by: fearlessmanateehunter
» We All Can't Be You Posted by: edith
» Kaiser Criminal Update Posted by: edith
You think the marked is callous? Try GOVERNMENT.
Posted by: BJT on Jun 22, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Government has killed millions without batting an eye. Please don't put our health in its hands.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVZp6xPA7tk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXZaTXDu3Os

Government is FORCE.
The market is voluntary.
Which do you think is more humane?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Healthcare
Posted by: Feed-up on Jun 22, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress won't change healthcare for Americans because they have their healthcare free - another perk !! Get them to have the same healthcare as the average American and you'll see how quickly it will change !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One step further... Posted by: edith
ME ideology
Posted by: shangrilalad on Jun 22, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Americans care about their future, and their children’s future, they must discard the Republican’s ME ideology, and concentrate on a WE ideology. Using the ME ideology of selfishness and greed, Republicans have divided and sicced Americans on each other like pack of starving wolves in a pit. The “Winners,” far above the carnage in their Executive Suites, are entertained watching the gladiators (Losers) fight to the death.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ME ideology Posted by: willymack
The Fearless Manatee Hunter
Posted by: fearlessmanateehunter on Jun 22, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Michael and Amy... Great piece....!

I know that I'm going to sound like a broken record, however, it all begins with campaign finance reform. With out that, and I'm talking about Draconian changes, we will never achieve any meaningfull and permanent health care reform... Did I say reform...? Sorry, I meant revolution....

We need to remember that revolutions do not evolve in a vacume. It's not a question of if, but when.

VIVA LA REVOLUCION....!

Best regards,

The Fearless Manatee Hunter,
Killer of the Gentle Sea Cow

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Physicians must demand their right to practice all of their skill
Posted by: fearless flower on Jun 22, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The present system also hurts doctors who must practice within the constraints of the insurance companies they deal with in order to get their patients' fees covered. For instance if someone comes in with an atypical ailment, a doctor can't put that down on an insurance claim! They must diagnose and prescribe something, even if they are not sure what it is, in order for the visit to be covered. I worry that this system forces doctors to think and act according to what insurance companies demand and suppresses good physicians' own instincts about what is really best for the patient. That may include not doing anything, which is certainly allowed under the Hypocratic Oath ("First Do No Harm").

I had a physician who had a strong interest in using natural alternatives to treat her patients, but could not do it in her practice and get it covered by the insurance companies she had to deal with.

Moreover, the diagnoses that doctors out down on those forms can hurt a patient in the long run. I know of a cancer patient who recovered but had to go for check ups for several years and the insurance company required those visits to be billed as "follow up for cancer treatments". He ended up not being able to get a mortgage because of those billing records, even though he was cancer free during all those check-ups.

Whatever health care system we end up with, it must allow and encourage doctors to practice their skills as they need in order to best help their patients.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Reality of the Situation
Posted by: dkm on Jun 22, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am pleased to notice that there were very few idiots on board who think that Privatized = Good, Government = Bad.

I read an article yesterday about the VA system. Years ago it was a mess, but Clinton put in an administrator, Kenneth Kizer, (a Republican, no less) who got the thing going and now it has a better record than any other system in the US including such places as the Mayo Clinic and the Massachusetts General Hospital. It provides more service for less money and its patients, although they are older than the general population, live longer and have better health. The Bush administration is doing its best to destroy it, but until the present Friend of Bush (James Nicholson) was appointed as director, it was totally public, not private, and very well run. It would be the best model for a national health program, not Medicare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whose fault is it?
Posted by: dkm on Jun 22, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The various entities of the for profit health racket will be having a conniption fit over Michael Moore's latest production, but like the elites in Venezuela, they have no one to blame but themselves. They didn't have to be greedy. They could have put their clients first instead of their bottom line. They could have worked with service in mind instead of getting rich. They chose to ignore their duties to their clients and instead lavished everything on their investors and administrators. They worship at the altar of Mammon so if they get put out of business, it will be what they deserve. They asked for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Whose fault is it? Posted by: edith
keep up the good work, Mike
Posted by: eosrk on Jun 22, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and keep on pounding their asses, and hey, if you need help, call me up or email me at dogeatdogeatcat@yahoo.com. I have a few secrets of my own to tell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Mike
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jun 22, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am hoping this movie will be a wake up call for our country.
Somehow, we need to organize and overthrow this evil system of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

former cancer patient
Posted by: sashi on Jun 22, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kaiser has provided excellent care for me and my family: i was diagnosed with cancer in 1992, at the age of 11. it was an extremely rare form and i had the best nurses, doctors, surgeons and oncologists that one could ask for. i was cured and have been cancer-free for 15 years. both of my grandparents were diagnosed with cancers in the years shortly after and, also received excellent care: i have never heard of so many nurses and doctors volunteer time outside of work to help a family.

so, i just wanted to say that if we can manage to run socialized healthcare in a manner similar to kaiser (outside of the ridiculous fees for private insurance), i think it would be a positive step in the right direction.

(i've heard the horror stories about bad doctors, etc with kaiser--here's a hint--if you don't like what your doctor is doing, you can ask for a new one! )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the 21st Century Single Payer Health Care and Nationalize Oil and Energy..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jun 22, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Single Payer Health Care System and Nationalizing The America Oil Industry, and or all Energy is the Future...

If we did these two things we could then proceed into the 21st Century and now in the Global Economy they make more sense than ever both morally and economically..

Instead we will fight needless wars destroy ourselves as a world power for the sake of the "Free Traitors" who are operating still within a 19th Century formula and selling off America piece by piece, breaking up all of it's, OUR assets..!

We are a Corporate Oligarchy Masquerading as a Nation..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most Important Quote
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jun 22, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"if we all throw in with them too soon on this without forcing them to take good positions on these issues, I don't think we're going to get anywhere".

Michael Moore has the right idea, force is necessary. He doesn't say when, where, or how to apply the force.
Let me suggest this:
When - before the party conventions.
Where - At the National and State Headquarters of both parties.
How - Threaten to cast a protest vote for "Honest Abe" if neither party puts your most important issue on their platform.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A CRYING SHAME...
Posted by: omatravel on Jun 22, 2007 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned this week of an incident which is a crying shame in this country. A young single mother on Medicaid who, upon finally gaining employment at a local assisted living home, needed a statement from her doctor verifying that she has no communicable diseases. She was told by the receptionist that she had a balance of $1.00 (ONE DOLLAR) and would have to pay another $1.00 (ONE DOLLAR) to see the doctor to receive the signed statement.

Standing at the glass window separating the waiting room from the receptionist desk, she painstakingly counted out $1.45, the total money which she had. She said that she would have to go home for the difference and went to her car. She called back on her cell phone to say that she would have to reschedule because she didn't have $2.00. At no time did the clerks offer to let her see the doctor and pay the huge sum of $2.00 later.

Lest your readers draw the same callous conclusions that the doctor's staff did - that "she has a car" and "she has a cell phone" thereby somehow justifying their cruel treatment, let me clarify that both are provided by my Good Samaritan daughter who has helped this young woman to get her GED certificate and this new job in order to provide a better life for herself and her child.

Regardless of how she got herself into this situation, her past is no more despicable than this professional leech of a doctor who, according to the receptionist whom I questioned about this incident, is "adamant" that Medicaid patients pay the $1.00 per visit. Had I been the receptionist, I would have paid the $1.00 from my own pocket rather than embarrass anyone over such a trivial sum of money.

As a result of this experience, I am taking $20.00 to the receptionist and asking that it be used to pay the $1.00 for ANYONE who visits them who is refused treatment because they lack their copay. I will take additional money when the $20.00 is exhausted; in the meantime, I am requesting my personal medical records and will find another doctor because I don't want anyone who is so callous and greedy to receive the benefits of my excellent insurance which I am so fortunate to have in this country. Unfortunately, I probably will find only another one who holds the same "charitable" Hippocratic (hypocritic) beliefs so prevalent in America's health care system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A CRYING SHAME... Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: A CRYING SHAME... Posted by: omatravel
» NOT GREEDY or CALLOUS Posted by: gellero
On Michael Moore
Posted by: kabac55 on Jun 22, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore has got to be one of the most polarizing folks in America. Since I live near his home town, he's also a bit of local "hero" for his early documentary, "Roger and Me" on the closing of the auto manufacturing plants in Flint MI. He's been commenting on what he sees as the inequitites of economic life in America for 30+ years. Some of what he reports is true; some is not; some is exaggerated. Nevertheless, the guy knows how to start a discussion rolling and gets some people thinking and doing something. In these times, this takes guts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Polarizing? Posted by: WitchyNy
Other countries do a better job
Posted by: brunowe on Jun 22, 2007 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American Prospect recently did a run-down of them in an article called The Health of Nations. The article mentions France has having the system given the highes rating by a recent WHO survey. Some excerpts re the French system.

"the French utilize more care than Americans do, averaging six physician visits a year to our 2.8, and they spend more time in the hospital as well. Yet they still manage to spend half per capita than we do, largely due to lower prices and a focus on preventive care. "

and

"In order to prevent cost sharing from penalizing people with serious medical problems -- the way Health Savings Accounts threaten to do -- the [French] government limits every individual's out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, the government has identified thirty chronic conditions, such as diabetes and hypertension, for which there is usually no cost sharing, in order to make sure people don't skimp on preventive care that might head off future complications."

The interesting thing is that the US spends a higher percentage of GDP on health care than France does (15.4% vs. 10.5%, according to WHO).

I think the question as to what happens to the workers at insurance companies is a good one. First, it depends on if a new system would totally eliminate ins. cos. or simply reduce them to a role of providing supplemental insurance to those who want to spend extra money. However some dislocation seems inevitable and such a program should have a transition measure to assist affected workers.

In terms of economic impact, I would point out that such a reform would boost many other business that would be relieved from the cost of running health plans for their employees. Given that a large chunk of personal bankruptcies occur as a result of medical expenses, there would be an economic boost there as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having chided MM earlier on this thread about tossing Kaiser into the same pot with…
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 22, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hallliburton, I want to thank him for taking on the greedy HMO industry.

To show where my heart lies, I need only mention having a 43-year-old, single mom daughter who is self-employed and can’t afford health insurance.

Pardon my French, folks, but overall, America’s "esteemed' medical system is a fucking disgrace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Although
Posted by: paschn on Jun 22, 2007 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I admire Mr. Moore and his character and have since before most of you along with other drones at the Academy Awards booed him from the stage for his condemnation of Bush's war, ( you must remember it, the same crowd that gave a standing ovation to a convicted rapist, one Roman Polanski),
Knowing this "fine" nation as I do, it won't be "sicko" that finally gets healthcare passed. No more than it was when Ms. Clinton tried convincing you idiots it was necessary. What will get it done is the fact that BIG BUSINESS is behind it now. Because this nation, this culture hasn't the ability to think beyond their own comfort. As long as they're working, they could care less that millions of OTHER U.S. sheeples' jobs have been subsidized with our tax dollars for moves to 3rd world countries. Wanna thank someone? Thank the rapacious greed of corporate U.S. who finally saw that by stepping clear of their friends, the INSURANCE companies, they can achieve an even LARGER bottom line. Of course the Insurance companies they are stepping clear from can't hold it against 'em cuz,... well,... it's only good business,... right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trillion Dollar Health Scam
Posted by: snowhound on Jun 22, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch this ABC 60 minutes clip to see why our health care system is so bad. Our politicians are too cozy with the Pharma industry and their allowing the Drug companies to over charge the government (the taxpayers) for drugs. These pimps are making billions on our backs.

http://v.mercola.com /blogs/ public_blog/ Trillion-Dollar-Health-Scam-19438.aspx

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Scandelous Medicare Prescription Coverage
Posted by: macdon1 on Jun 22, 2007 4:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My sister, who is a 71 year old retired teacher with asthma told me that me that Medicare uses the high retail cost of drugs, not their cost to count down the covered prescription allowance to make it go faster and then uses their much lower cost as a basis for counting down the "donut hole" amount which the patient pays before the coverage kicks in again. In addition to that, Big Pharma raised their prices at least 30% when this so-called "benefit" kicked in. As a result, she pays between $650 and $1000 out of pocket every month but Medicare only credits her with their much lower cost figure not what she actually pays. Just another example of our corrupt and dishonest government and how they mislead the public with doubletalk.
Their programs are the fruit of a rotten tree.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the single payer we have
Posted by: Mamarianne on Jun 22, 2007 6:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medicare, for all its faults, comes as a great relief to retirees who leave their employment health plans. As someone who could retire, but can't because of health care insurance needs, I have wondered how many of our uninsured could be insured if the age for medicare were dropped to 62 or 60. This would phase in single payer plan for many, many uninsured.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Polarizing criticism
Posted by: Shey on Jun 22, 2007 6:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need polarization, the problem with the Democrats is too much "bi-partisan" compromise (read capitulation). You don't change anything by slithering to the middle. The issue is extreme and calls for extreme measures, extreme statements and actions. The pole where all the power is concentrated is firmly in the hands of the five percent of richest Americans, the rest of us need to run like hell to the opposite end of the poll and shake it until we dislodge the twenty first century version of the Robber barons from their strangle hold on our society. We need rabble rousers like Moore. Go, Michael!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Can't Happen Here
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Jun 22, 2007 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Moore's keen eye has undoubtedly scored again. However, I think he's overlooking something. He cites the fact that Canada's health care program takes only 1.7% of their budget, and I'm sure his figures are correct. And if the U.S. would consider cutting its defense budget by 1.7%, we could comfortably afford universal, cradle-to-grave health care for every last citizen. This is hardly likely, however. Because if there is one thing more grotesque, obscene, ludicrous, and bloated beyond belief than than the profits raked in by health insurance companies, it's the United States' annual defense budget. It is also, by the way, an utter waste of the taxpayers' money. In fiscal '06, for instance, your government outspent by $29 billion the defense expenditures of the rest of the world combined. A bit of overkill perhaps? When supposedly, our current bogeyman is the Islamofascist sneaking a dirty bomb onto the subway.

So I'm not terribly impressed with the reception Michael Moore was given by Congresspeople. The vast majority of them signed off on the most recent defense budget, which is bankrupting the country, which is a large part of the reason that uninsured people keep dying. They sign that budget, by the way, at least partly because the guys from K Street see to it that there's a little baksheesh finding its way into their pockets--especially, I venture to guess, the foot-draggers.

Mr. Moore is also right on the money with his comment that the U.S. is a "me" rather than a "we" society, like most of the rest of the developed world. If America ever did have any heart, it was lost sometime in the early '80s--right about the time that the late, lamented Saint Ronald Reagan closed down public mental hospitals across the country, and forced all those poor lost souls out on the streets. Why? Because he needed the money to finance his wars of containment in Latin America, and he happened to have a lot of good friends whose companies had defense contracts. And, oh, yeah, he thought people should stand on their own two feet, especially the damn crazies. It's The American Way, you know.

So if you're counting on a Democratic president in '09 to finally do something about the appalling healthcare system in this country, I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. The insurance industry has an extremely effective lobby, and lobbies are the real power in Washington--they have been for about the past half century. The people we elect simply go through the motions of maintaining our Potemkin Republic, because for one thing, they all end up with oh-so-plummy retirements--usually, thanks to the same good old boys from K St. So, Mr. Moore, and everyone else, howl all you like, but until and unless we do something about electing people that doesn't involve selling their political souls, nothing will change. If we do not wise up and finally prohibit lobbying for the massive legalized bribery that it is, government-provided health care will remain merely the stuff of Democrats' empty promises.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I heard a bang.
Posted by: wisegalah on Jun 22, 2007 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I looked around to see a woman lying on the ground. She had been knocked down by a heedless driver.
A crowd gathered quickly with the first to arrive attempting to assist the woman who was of small stature and asian appearance.
Within five minutes an ambulance arrived. No questions were asked about her financial status. She was picked up because she was in need. She would have been taken to a large public hospital which was about a mile away where she would have been treated according to her needs.
She may not have even been a citizen but that would have made no difference to her treatment.
Questions about her status, her financial situation would have been asked later. If she was unable to pay and was an Australian citizen or permanent resident all costs would have charged against the government using the Medicare system.
If she had been an inpecunious foreigner she would have been given a bill and allowed to leave. If she did not pay up then the costs would eventually have been met by the government. In other words the community provides a safety net for everybody. The net is found to have some holes from time to time but overall it is quite effective.
She may have had private insurance in which case she may have been covered for part or all of the costs of her treatment.
Why can this type of system not be introduced in the USA. Is an unreasoning terror of 'socialism'?
Unfortunately your government has been suborned by big business and now fails to see that its principle function is to protect the rights and interests of the individual. A total perversion of this principle is the granting of the same rights that the individual has to the large business entities. That must be struck down by someone. That move was a masterly stroke by the corporate lawyers who thus revealed themselves as whores of capitalism.

Wisegalah in Sydney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I heard a bang. Posted by: richholland
» RE: I heard a bang. Posted by: lonpine
It all comes down to personal health habits, anyway
Posted by: dbursch on Jun 24, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Health care would cost next to nothing, even as universal coverage, if all that got treated were truly unavoidable illness or accidents. As a practicing physical therapist in the system for over 20 years I can assure you the big problem is the average lazy and over-consumptive lifestyle of wealthy countries like us.
I am a big fan of Michael Moore's because he is one of the few brave and powerful voices trying to wake us all up about the evils of corporatocracy and the psychosocial assumptions that sustain it. I have not yet seen the movie (can't wait!), but I hope he puts a great deal of emphasis on personal responsbility for health. Until we all "get" that, health "care" will remain a huge monkey on our collective backs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are very right Posted by: Bobsays
IF U LOVE HOW GOVERNMENT WORKS, LET IT MANAGE HEALTH CARE.
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold on Jun 24, 2007 4:50 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having lived in both the UK and Australia and experienced the horrors of "National Health Care", first hand. I'd say the accuracy of Michael Moore's documentary "Sicko" ranks right up there with the so called "accuracy" of his other so called documentaries: "Rodger & Me" and Bowling for Columbine = NOT! Granted. The present health care system, especially "Managed Health Care" has it problems. But asking government to take over IS A RECEIPT FOR DESASTER!......BEEN THERE. DONE THAT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]