Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

Why Americans Keep Getting Fatter

By Scott Kahan, The Baltimore Sun. Posted June 21, 2007.


The USDA grossly underfunds the healthiest foods while pouring billions into a farm bill that supports many of the foods its dietary recommendations warn against.
Advertisement

A long-running contradiction in U.S. farm policy is fattening the waistlines of Americans and the profits of agribusiness at the same time. For the 30 years that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been issuing dietary guidelines, there has been a stark inconsistency between the federal government's advice and its food funding.

True, the USDA has been doing more, over time, to promote health through dietary guidelines, food pyramids and other nutrition programs. And yet more than $20 billion yearly -- more than one-fifth its budget -- is sunk into a farm bill that supports many of the foods its recommendations warn against. At the same time, the department virtually ignores incentives to produce, promote and consume some of the healthiest foods: fruits and vegetables.

This contradiction may play a role in today's obesity epidemic and is in part driven by a counterintuitive farm policy, highlighted by the farm bill, which is up for renewal this year in Congress. This legislation began during the Depression to protect farmers against environmental disasters and plummeting crop prices but has evolved into a massive program of handouts, largely benefiting agribusinesses. Worse, it promotes vast overproduction of crops that are the building blocks of calorie-dense, nutrient-poor, processed junk foods. It has become a "food bill."

For a half-century, the farm bill served farmers and the public well by regulating supply and stabilizing food prices. In 1973, it was overhauled to significantly increase crop production. According to the USDA Economic Research Service, the U.S. food supply has since ballooned by 500 calories per person per day, and per capita food consumption has increased by more than 200 calories per day -- the equivalent of more than 20 pounds of fat per year.

This mammoth oversupply would be less egregious if it were spread equally among the food groups. Instead, most funding supports just a few crops, and those lay the foundation of the standard American diet: high in sugars and empty-calorie, refined grains; high in fats; low in whole grains and fiber; and low in fruits and vegetables.

Take corn, the most highly subsidized crop, which received $9.4 billion in 2005 -- nearly as much as all other crops combined. Corn production has more than doubled since the 1970s, and all this artificially cheapened corn is unloaded on the public, largely in the form of tasty but empty-calorie junk foods. Refined corn is the chief source of carbohydrates and calories in most processed foods, particularly snack foods. High-fructose corn syrup is the most widely used caloric sweetener in the United States. And corn meal is widely used as cheap animal feed to fatten factory-raised livestock.

Another example is soybeans, the fourth-most-subsidized crop. Although soy protein is a healthful meat substitute, soybeans are more commonly used in junk foods. Soybean oil accounts for 75 percent of the fat in processed foods and is commonly hydrogenated to create trans fats, which improve shelf life but are known to cause cardiovascular disease.

In contrast, healthful foods are grossly underfunded. USDA guidelines advise that fruits and vegetables make up at least one-third of daily intake, but just 5 percent of its food funding supports the fruit and vegetable industries. There is virtually no funding for public education and advertising encouraging fruit and vegetable consumption. At its peak, the "Five-a-day" campaign budget was just $3 million annually -- compared with the $11 billion spent yearly in the United States for fast food and junk food advertising. McDonald's spent $500 million just promoting its "We Love To See You Smile" campaign.

This is one reason Americans don't eat fruits and vegetables. Although some surveys suggest we eat about four servings daily, this number is greatly exaggerated because French fries and potato chips are counted the same as spinach, carrots or broccoli. In fact, 25 percent of vegetables consumed in the United States are fried potatoes, making the daily consumption of healthful fruits and vegetables closer to two servings -- and possibly lower in children and inner-city populations.

Farm policy is an ideal avenue to address the obesity epidemic at its roots.

As Congress considers this year's farm bill, it should rework the legislation so it meets the needs of today's food consumers, not agribusiness. The new farm bill should significantly shift funding to improve the availability, affordability and promotion of fruits, vegetables and other healthful foods.

In particular, it should include targeted investments to fruit and vegetable growers to increase the availability of fresh produce, support for the new "Fruits & Veggies -- More Matters" initiative, expansion of the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Pilot Program to all 50 states to promote the eating of fruits and vegetables in schools, creation of incentives for fresh fruit and vegetable purchases in the Food Stamp program, and support for organic farming.

These steps could signal that our government is ready to lead the fight against obesity and diet-related chronic disease by nurturing the health-conscious lifestyle it advocates by its dietary guidelines.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: farm policy, food policy, dietary guidelines, usda

Scott Kahan is a physician and postdoctoral fellow at the Johns Hopkins University. He has published 13 books on medicine and nutrition. His e-mail is scott.kahan@iebn.org. Roni Neff, research director for the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, contributed to this article.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You had me...
Posted by: Mop Cheese on Jun 21, 2007 1:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as far as "get rid of those subsidies". But I don't think the government should play a role in how thick my waistline is. It's bad enough that they steal from me: they don't need to take the role of an annoying family member as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You had me... Posted by: kelt65
» Why government should play a role. Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» Great post, Rune Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Rune... Posted by: Mop Cheese
» RE: Also... Posted by: Mop Cheese
» brilliant post Rune Posted by: off-the-radar 2
» RE:Norsky, hagwing, CatDad Posted by: Mop Cheese
» We've never had a free market.... Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Ever check the nutritional values of welfare food?
Posted by: ateo on Jun 21, 2007 1:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Government:
cheese (not low fat)
peanut butter (not natural)
pork (pork)

No wonder poor people are fat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PB & J Posted by: slydad
4
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 21, 2007 3:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if the government were to provide better subsidies for fruits and vegetables, that would increase supply, lower the cost to the consumer, and the consumer would eat better...or something like that?

I'm not so sure. Our addiction to junk is more than just a cost issue. A lot of the crap we eat at McD, the frozen dinners, etc. costs more than things that are good for you. I think it's a cultural thing. People eat junk because they want to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4 Posted by: dmdem
Phrase that pays: Diet AND exercise
Posted by: omnivore on Jun 21, 2007 3:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm astonished that so many articles showing how bad American waistlines and BMI's are also fail to show the importance of exercise in maintaining health.
Is it any coincidence that as we've practically automated all forms of labour, that we've become a sedentary society, since the first and second industrial revolution, gettng fatter and less nutritionally intelligent? It wasn't that long ago when Americans actually worked. Now we rely on what I jokingly call sorcery: automation, legislation, induction of foreigners into our labour pool, investment, those who do not labour physically like accountants lawyers programmers salespersons, etc. I often think that society at large has absolutely no use for them, that there is no intrinsic value to their industries. We all give value to them because of our own laziness or lack of ime/energy/commitment/ or technical expertise.
In indegenous tribal societies, consider the physiques and resistance to/absence of disease of, say, Papua New Guinians, 'Negritos' of the Philippines, or even the pygmies of Central Africa. Also NA's on this continent before they were forced to eat Spam and GM corn, giving them all sorts of heart, liver, blood, kidney, immune and nervous system diseases. Friggin' diesel. Those people are fit, because they're always on the move. They eat foods native and seasonal to their environment. They deserve to survive.
We don't. We need shows to show how tough it is out there, even though most American kids don't even know where food comes from. Many American parents don't know either. To automate everything, to be sedentary and complacent in our thinking and critical of the world from our armchair, all the while mindlessly consuming, allowing large-scale agribusiness to keep giving us what we childishly desire: more sugar, fat, salt, GMO's, emptycarbs, nutritionless 'dead' junk food. Stupid, truly. This is what pollutes the mind through the body. Indeed, the body is the conscious mind manifested.
I'm a cycle courier, a personal trainer, and part-time personal assistant. I'm not saying everyone should have three jobs. Or even a physical one. Or even be a vegan. But I do think that regualr and frequent calorie expenditure in lieu of constantly using the body to achieve the goals of survival and financial success are a huge part to maintaining health and fitness, which are not the same thing, although improving one may drastically help the other. It's a start to help heal the body-mind-spirit. We must approach health and fitness in an integrated fashion in harmony with the environment. This, I believe, will help people to literally think better. So much of Amercan life is filled with negative thoughts and action. The only way to combat that is to improve yourself.
"Lead from the front." - Scott Sonnon, founder of Rmaxinternational,
"Physician, heal thyself." - guess who...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are so on the money Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: You are so on the money Posted by: sterlingdave54
It's NOT rocket science
Posted by: wawa on Jun 21, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excess calories=FAT

Couch potatoitis=FAT

Food is fuel for the body and if you want the best body you use your brain and choose to eat nutrient dense food-NATURAL NOT PROCESSED!
NOT FAST FOOD!


Exercise is necessary on a daily basis and should be PLAY; find things you enjoy and do something aerobic every day.

Lift weights 2-3 times a week for muscles require more calories than FAT to maintain.


It takes 6 weeks to make a habit; so even if you 'hate' to exercise give it 6 weeks and the benefits you reap in that short time, you just may find addictive, most esp. if you have an addictive personality.

Healthy habits are more satisfying than overindulging in negative ones.

For those over 50; try Pilates on a reformer if you can afford the classes, it is money well spent.

Pilates is great for toning and stretching and the mental focus required is 'icing on the cake'

Spend your life doing for others and your appetite will shrink; thinking of the least and doing all you can for them, will keep you sleek.



eileen fleming, retired registered nurse, full time justice and peace activist
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fat is flavor
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Jun 21, 2007 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people get fat for a variety of reasons.. over indulgence,lack of exercise, preexisting health conditions etc... Personally I cannot sit still for long enough to get morbidly obese....I cannot understand how one could let themselves get to that point.... Sure I have a few extra pounds to spare, but since my life revolves around being a gourmet and a gourmand as well as a hyper active spaz, I stay in fairly decent balance. The key is to keep active. Not only does it keep you feeling physically good, It completely sharpens your psychological health. People used to work physicallly demanding jobs, now they get all doughy by rotting away infront of a computer screen. The good news is you can change that.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Go, Gravitas! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: ver hear of the term quisling???? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» WRONG! Fat blocks flavor... Posted by: jparsons
» RE: WRONG! Fat blocks flavor... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: WRONG! Fat blocks flavor... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
NO WONDER POOR PEOPLE ARE FAT......WTF?
Posted by: thetruth07 on Jun 21, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are fat Americans across the board.....
I'm living here in Japan and there is a huge difference in how they eat and exercise over here.
The biggest sumo wrestler is more fit than the average overweight or obese American!
(And come to think of it possibly the most fit American).
Come on, let's stop kidding ourselves, Americans love to eat but don't like to exercise....period!!!! We eat far more calories than we should and don't exercise enough to burn off those calories. We don't walk, run, ride bicycles or do anytbing remotely physical outdoors anymore.
Here in Japan it's all about fish and veggies and on top of that they walk, run, and ride bicycles. You see old and young Japanese people walking, running and riding bicycles. They always shop at the market where the food is always very fresh. And desserts don't have a ton of sugar in them!!
And let's not forget portion control, they don't eat large portions like Americans do.
Americans have to learn that nothing beats fresh veggies, meat and fish. Learn to read labels 'cause let's face it packaged food is made with chemicals for a long shelf life, not for the benefit of keeping you healthy!
So, until we go back to cooking at home, eating smaller portions, eating more veggies, laying off the sugar, being more active and stop believeing there's a magic pill, we'd have a healthier America!!
But I guess it's easier said than done, 'cause there goes another Big Mac meal sold!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I concur Posted by: skoog5600
» RE: I concur Posted by: redceres
» RE: I concur Posted by: PopRox80
Obesity + a ghastly health care system
Posted by: skoog5600 on Jun 21, 2007 4:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a good combination in the long run. As overweight Americans age there will be all kinds of health problems. If they are so lucky to have a decent health plan it could stave off the inevitable for a while longer with triple bypass surgery and a stint. But if not, then you will see all kinds of people dropping like flies.

As for the overweight parents of children, I suspect they are passing on their habits to them. So there you have it another generation of overweight Americans.

Perhaps it is not the terrorists that will bring down the US. I am reminded of the scene from Monty Python's movie, I believe it is called "The Life of Brian" where the morbidly obese man is in a restaurant finishing a massive meal - he is bloated to the point of exploding, all the while asking for a bucket so he can throw up in it and can continue to eat. Along comes John Cleese as the waiter offering the man a "wafer thin mint". The fat man replies, I'm full, but the waiter is persistent and finally the Fat man obliges and eats the wafer thin mint. John Cleese dives over the bar to take cover just as the man explodes with his entrails splattering all over the restaurant.

In all seriousness I will finish with this - I no longer live in the US, but when I do visit and get off the plane, I am very taken back by all the overweight and dare I say obese people - young and old.

I concur with some of the comments, it takes some discipline, exercise and dare I say common sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Monty Python ref Posted by: BlueTigress
Fast Foods & Healthy Food
Posted by: kmart35 on Jun 21, 2007 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always applauded the meager efforts of fast food restaurants to add healthy foods to their menu. Last year Wendy added a fruit platter with yogurt which my daughter and I loved! We went to 5 or 6 stores in our town and they never would have them. Why don't you have chili instead? Then they had an article in our paper later saying they discontinued them b/c no one was buying them. How can you buy them when they don't have them to sell?!? I think if they actually had them available more people would have tried them/bought them but many probably get tired of ordering an item that's never available!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

F & V for sound teeth, too
Posted by: nyscof on Jun 21, 2007 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the same reasons Americans are getting more cavities - poor diet. Dentists would have you believe it's lack of fluoride even though fluoride is not a nutrient nor required for healthy teeth. Adding fluoride to drinking water, fluoridation, gets them off the hook for allowing a dental health crisis to occur on their watch, especially among low-income Americans who often fill their children's hungry bellies with all they can afford to do it with - cheap chips and soda. 80% of dentists refuse to treat Medicaid patients. Growing numbers of middle class Americans are losing their dental insurance. And the working poor can't afford dentistry.

If fruits and vegetables were subsidized and made so cheap that all Americans would learn to love them (with the help of delicious Rachel Ray recipes) and lower-income people would have no choice but to eat healthy, tooth decay rates would decline along with many other preventable diseases.

Of course, everyone wouldn't comply, but I bet there would be a measurable improvement in American health. However, simply removing the fluoride chemicals from the entire U.S. water supplies would also have a measurable positive effect on overall health.


Fluoridation 101
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof

http://www.fluorideaction.net/health

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politically Correct Nutrition
Posted by: snowhound on Jun 21, 2007 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the information people receive about what's healthy and whats not is fueld by special interests. Food education that the media and government promote, like everything else, is totally based on a buisness model whos main goal is to increase consumption and profits. Remeber how much healthier margarine was than butter? Most people don't know that saturated fats can help you lose weight while unsaturated fats like vegetable oil can promote weight gain. The reason the government pushes vegetable oil instaead of the healthy tropical oils is because we don't grow coconuts in this country, we grow corn. It has nothing to do with what's healthy and what's not. Soy for example is not a healthy food. 90% of it is genetically modified and soy naturally contains high levels of estrogenic compunds. It actually causes deficiencies of Vitamin D which has been shown to greatly reduce cancer risks. It disrupts the endocrine system which regulates hormones. Plastics are another toxin that disrupts this system. The point is that there can be so many reasons for the obesity epidemic and it all revolves around the corporate machine that puts profits over the health of the people. The science has always been there, it's just that nobody has an interest in the science because the science never has a place in corporate America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our vegetables are not as nutritious
Posted by: Lizmv on Jun 21, 2007 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several years ago, the FDA issued a report that our vegetables are not a nutritious as 50 years ago (the beginning of the "Green Revolution"). Since that report, I have wondered if we eat more because our bodies are telling us we need more of the vital nutrients and aren't getting them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our vegetables are not as nutritious Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Our vegetables are not as nutritious Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
About this "obesity epidemic" . . .
Posted by: hagwind on Jun 21, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does it seem to get so much more attention than the "stress epidemic"? Excess stress over extended periods of time causes all sorts of health problems, from the minor and inconvenient to the major and life-threatening. Not to mention -- food intake is often related to stress: not for nothing are certain edibles referred to as "comfort foods." For sure exercise is a great way to reduce stress. A long-ago boss of mine is alive today mainly because when I worked that job, I biked to and from work most days of the week, 10 miles each way. This used up the excess adrenaline that otherwise probably would have made me go postal and strangle the bastard.

So why does the "obesity epidemic" get so much attention? Some people get off the plane in the U.S. and immediately notice how fat everyone is. When I go to the big city, I immediately notice how stressed and withdrawn and driven many people seem to be. Much yammering about the "obesity epidemic" is done by people who spend a lot of time in cities: Maybe fat is more obvious to them than stress? Maybe identifying stress as a major problem would require them to take a discomfiting look at their own unhealthy assumptions and behaviors, instead of just going tsk-tsk-tsk at other people?

One reason I'm suspicious of this obsession with "obesity" is that it looks so much like the fatphobia that has been around a lot longer. Fatphobia is not only, or even primarily, about health; if it were, why would so many people -- particularly women -- smoke cigarettes to damp down their appetite for food? (Believe me, most of us knew in our hearts -- or in our lungs -- that smoking wasn't good for us long before the surgeon general's warning appeared on cigarette packs and tobacco company ads disappeared from TV.)

A big appeal of religion for some people is that it gives them the right -- nay, the obligation -- to pass judgment on certain behaviors and to exert great effort to convert (or silence) the people who practice those behaviors. This drive to judge and convert (or silence) is not peculiar to religion, though it tends to be exacerbated when it's underwritten by some omnipotent authority. At a certain point, rants about fat and the "obesity epidemic" start to sound a lot like rants about Sodom and Gomorrah.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It is all about $$$$$$$$ Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: It is all about $$$$$$$$ Posted by: chrisp.
» RE: Exercise is a great stress reliever Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
blame
Posted by: momlbrown on Jun 21, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much as I would like to blame the government, I feel my overweight problem is the result of my personal choices and behavior. I agree we can improve on the government programs, but let's be honest about who is ultimately responsible for our weight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: blame Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: WTF??? Posted by: Maxwell House
» RE: WTF??? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: WTF??? Posted by: WyrdSister
What is the problem? Capitalism is the answer---
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jun 21, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fresh fruits and vegetables don't last long.

A hamburger, potato chips and coke- last forever.

The goal here is not health-the goal is making more money!

A profit based system LEADS to unhealthy fat people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So what are you suggesting? Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Exploitive Title
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 21, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I resent both the title and the picture beside it. Yet another attempt by the left to exploit the alleged "obesity" epidemic for its own purposes. I have no qualm with the point about government hypocrisy or food subsidies. But he doesn't need to further stereotype fat people to do it.

First of all, the whole calories in vs. out theory belongs in the flat earth society. Simple "overeating" is not now, never has been, never will be the main cause of obesity. We need to start looking at growth hormones they put in meat and milk. Environmental endocrine disrupters may also play a role. Americans work more than most industrialized countries, and lack of sleep contributes to both obesity and diabetes. Dieting the way it is done by ALL commercial weight loss schemes changes one's body to make it better at storing fat. The stigma and stress contributes to binge eating disorders. And of course, genetics. There have been some fat people throughout history because the more diverse a species, the better its chance of survival. We forget fat was crucial to the survival of the human species. Yet we completely ignore all these factors. The stigma of obesity is actually functional for us as a society, which is the bottom line reason we refuse to look at the real causes that make people fat. I am going to provide some links to what I have mentioned under the comment to this article section.

BTW - I think it is the tackiest thing in the world to use a headless fat body like in that photo. Do you have any idea how dehumanizing that it???? How it contributes to seeing fat people as objects rather than people? How it causes people to disassociate from their own bodies? Don't EVER think you are any different from mainstream, corporate owned media constantly showing headless fat bodies from behind to grab headlines and send their viewers straight to Jenny Craig. I can't put into words the lack of respect I have for you at this moment. Not that it affects my own self-image. I am mentioning it for anyone else who is fat out there and is offended, but would never say anything. Or worse, simply internalize it without thinking. To them I say what matters most is how YOU view your body. I personally love my own 220lb body and I still get flirted with even though I am in my late 40s and dress conservatively. I am not absolving anyone's responsiblity NOT to stigmatize a fellow human being. I am simply stating that what is coming from the inside out is ultimately the most powerful force in shaping perception at the personal level. To help undo some of the emotional damage from the constant mainstream battering that people come to a more "progressive" site to try and avoid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more calories do not have to mean more fat
Posted by: kiel on Jun 21, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...per capita food consumption has increased by more than 200 calories per day -- the equivalent of more than 20 pounds of fat per year."

This is misleading. These calories could be burned in exercise which would build muscle. The impression that calories = fat is simply false, and harmful to anyone who wants to understand the way his/her body works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corn - now being fed to cars!
Posted by: counterpoint on Jun 21, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a little off topic but I'd like to remind people of the Ethanol Scam (google for more info, or read Edwin Black's outstanding book "Internal Combustion: How Corporations and Governments Addicted the World to Oil and Derailed the Alternatives". It's very simple: producing ethanol from corn consumes more fossil energy than it provides as a fuel (unlike ethanol produced in Brazil from sugarcane). And yet it is subsidized with huge amounts. Because our fuel demand is insatiable this new demand for corn has affected food corn prices. I remember reading that the recent uproar in Mexico over doubled tortilla prices (or so) had a connection there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FarmAid
Posted by: davcrock on Jun 21, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm tired of tax dollars being paid to agribusiness so that I have the privledge of paying more for my food. If you want to help the poor, make food cheaper by ending price supports.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FarmAid Posted by: Jarmadi
Red beans and rice didn't miss her
Posted by: apeshow on Jun 21, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns hon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In defense...
Posted by: iheartearth on Jun 21, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wanted to respond to the individual(s) who noted that the picture of the overweight individual and title of the article seems offensive. I agree. However, as a Maryland resident, I read this Op Ed when it was originally published in the Baltimore Sun a few weeks ago and there was no such picture (and, as an Op Ed, the article was untitled). As such, it seems that the editor of AlterNet, rather than the author of the article (Dr. Kahan), added in that information after the fact (and possibly without Dr. Kahan's permission).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good point! Thanks! Posted by: Gravitas
Something to look forward to?
Posted by: maddy on Jun 21, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have this mean-spirited optimism welling inside of me when I read articles about the obesity epidemic.

Between mass extinctions (see previous Alternet pieces on birds, honey bees, and the death of the oceans), global warming disasters, and impending warfare over access to oil, fresh water, and a dwindling food supply...

won't the obesity problem resolve itself--by necessity--in the next two generations or so?

"Yeah, well we may have killed off all the birds, bees, and fish, but at least we'll finally get a handle on the obesity epidemic!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Name something harder than losing weight.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 21, 2007 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a former nicotine addict who quite smoking 37 years ago and have been fighting obesity ever since. I don't know which will happen first -- dying from natural causes or reaching my ideal weight.

On second thought, there is no way I can lose all the extra pounds. To hell with people who think I'm fat. What counts is feeling fine and being healthy with a fully-functioning mind.

Aside from hip arthritus and treatable hypertension, I'm doing pretty good for a guy my age (72) despite walking with a cane. The best part is, being retired, I don't have to take shit from anyone. Except my wife, of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

peacefull1
Posted by: joshuawelch on Jun 21, 2007 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not one penny of taxpayer dollars should go to the practice of raising animals for food. This practice is the most resource intensive, environmentally destructive cruel means to produce food. Not to mention that meat and dairy are for the most part extremely unhealthy.
"Nothing will benefit human health and increase chances for survival on Earth as much as the evolution of a vegetarian diet." Albert Einstein

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I grew up in farm country, Indiana... Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Dairy and Meat are not unhealthy Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com