Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Health & Wellness

The Untold Story of America's Health Care Crisis

By Jonathan Cohn, Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.. Posted May 29, 2007.


The U.S. has not had a serious political discussion about health care reform since the early 1990s, and the system is unraveling. In his latest book, Sick, Jonathan Cohn lays bare the consequences any one of us could suffer if we don't replace it.
sickcover
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from Jonathan Cohn's latest book Sick: The Untold Story of America's Health Care Crisis -- and the People Who Pay the Price.

April 10, 2007 -- It was 4:43 on a clear November afternoon when the paramedics found Cynthia Kline, pale and short of breath, slumped against a bedpost in her double-decker Cambridge home. Although Kline was in obvious pain, she seemed keenly aware of what was happening inside her 55-year-old body. One of her blood vessels had closed off, blocking the flow of blood to her heart. Minutes before, she had phoned 911, taken the nitroglycerin tablets prescribed for such an emergency, then waited for help to arrive -- an ordeal that stretched out an agonizing extra few seconds while the rescue workers, having found the front door locked, scampered in through an open second-story window. Now, while the paramedics worked busily over her, noting vital signs consistent with cardiac distress, Kline turned to one of them with an anxious plea: "Take me to Mount Auburn Hospital."

Kline, a teacher who worked with special-needs children, had no formal medical training. Yet her instinct about where to go was as sound as a seasoned cardiologist's. Nearby Mount Auburn Hospital, a private teaching facility affiliated with Harvard Medical School, had some of the city's finest doctors and nurses. More important, it had an intensive cardiac care unit that specialized in cases like hers. A few days earlier, staff at Mount Auburn had treated Kline's advanced coronary disease by inserting a balloon into her circulatory system and then expanding it, in order to open up a partially blocked blood vessel. A variant on the very same procedure, "cardiac catheterization," could be used in an emergency like this one, when the flow of blood through a vessel was almost completely cut off. Cardiac catheterization had saved literally thousands of lives across the country.

The procedure had the potential to save Kline's life, too, just as soon as she could get to the hospital and receive it. But getting there was precisely the problem. On the way to Kline's home, the ambulance driver had checked with a dispatcher about hospital availability. Mount Auburn was no-go: the emergency room there was overflowing, with no space to handle new patients. So as the paramedics wheeled Kline into the ambulance, one of them told her they would have to deny her request: "Ma'am, we're going to Cambridge Hospital instead." Kline accepted the news, and maybe for a moment she thought it would be for the best. Although Mount Auburn was less than two miles away, Cambridge Hospital was even closer -- just a short trip through the crooked, disjointed streets that surround Harvard Square. It was also a highly regarded medical facility in its own right, with a top-notch medical staff and a recently renovated emergency area fully capable of handling the majority of trauma cases that came its way. Had Kline's condition remained as it was, it probably could have handled her case, too. But just four blocks into the journey, Kline's condition suddenly deteriorated. The instruments tethered to her arm could no longer detect a blood pressure; her heart rate, seventy beats per minute just moments before, was down to thirty-eight. Kline, strapped into a stretcher, was conscious through all of this-and increasingly agitated. At her side one of the paramedics, a kind-looking thirty-year-old, tried to calm her, explaining that the hospital was just seconds away. But as the ambulance made a right turn around one final corner, bringing the tall redbrick facade of Cambridge Hospital into view, Kline began to cry out: "I'm going to die. I'm going to die."

It was 5:04 p.m., just twenty-nine minutes after Kline had first called 911 and about an hour into the heart attack, when the green-and-white ambulance pulled up to the emergency bay. Informed of the patient's newly worsened state, attendants hustled the gurney into the hospital as the medical team began administering intravenous medication to increase Kline's heart rate. For a while it looked like she might pull through. Her pulse went back up to forty-five beats per minute -- a far cry from normal but at least not "very low," as it had been in the back of the rig. Her breathing was more regular, too. Soon, however, a cardiology exam confirmed that Kline needed catheterization, something the staff at Cambridge Hospital could not do. A nurse began inquiring about available hospitals, but now it was two hours since the chest pains had first begun-and time, finally, was running out. At 6 p.m. Kline's heart stopped altogether. The doctors began performing the familiar ritual of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), pumping her chest and using electrified paddles to shock the heart back into a regular rhythm. It made no difference. At 7:03 p.m., the trauma team relented. Cynthia Kline was dead.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: health care, sick

Jonathan Cohn is a senior editor at The New Republic, where he has written about national politics and its influence on American communities for the past decade. He is also a senior fellow at the think-tank Demos and a contributing editor at The American Prospect, where he served previously as the executive editor. Cohn, who has been a media fellow with the Kaiser Family Foundation, has written for the New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, Mother Jones, Rolling Stone, and Slate. A graduate of Harvard University, he now lives in Ann Arbor, Michigan, with his wife and two children.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The reality of medicine
Posted by: vitualis on May 29, 2007 1:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is without a doubt that the best level of care is primary PTCA for this patient but it is also somewhat unrealistic to expect that this can be necessarily performed within a 2 hour window for all patients, or even most patients.

Although the premise of this article is on crowding and under-resourced / resource mis-allocation of the health system and of emergency departments, this vignette is perhaps a poor example. Furthermore, it is likely to skew the health perspective of the United States even further towards emergency/tertiary level healthcare rather than primary and preventative health.

From an international perspective, technology and sophistication of tertiary level care is good to excellent in the United States, but access to primary health care is poor. Arguably, the necessary cost and resource allocation necessary to provide as near to universal access to primary PTCA would be much better spent on primary prevention programs that prevent cardiovascular disease in the first place.

Regards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The reality of medicine Posted by: ronatchig
» RE: The reality of medicine Posted by: Raymonde
Good luck
Posted by: LMNOP on May 29, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As with almost all American problems, the problem is not that we don't know what to do or that we need answers. The problem is that all solutions cuts into corporate profits, and that is sacrilege in America. It's just not going to happen with Democrats and Republicans in power.

As long as people continue to view our American problems as an unexpected problems occurring in a democracy, instead of like the plan and intent of the corporatocracy, they will be wasting their time.

The reason the system doesn't work isn't because nobody knows how to fix it. It's because we are prevented from fixing it by the health care industry and its puppet government.

This problem cannot be solved as long as the present Democratic-Republican corporatocracy remains in power, and that's the rest of my life. If you want better health care, try a better country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good luck Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Good luck Posted by: Raymonde
Rich can afford care, poor (and undocumented) get free health care
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 29, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rich can afford care, poor (and undocumented) get free health care and the middle class???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» universal health care oz/usa Posted by: aussieg1rl
"The Hospital"---1971
Posted by: zooeyhall on May 29, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We have established the most enormous medical entitity ever conceived, and people are sicker than ever!

We cure NOTHING!!! We heal NOTHING!!!""

---George C. Scott in "The Hospital" (1971)

Check out this great Paddy Chayefsky movie---a classic.
Sadly, in the 35 years since this film came out, the state of American medical care hasn't changed much. But then such is the power of money to stymie the political process, and thwart the will of the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "The Hospital"---1971 Posted by: Persephone8
» Great movie, could never be made today. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
FROM DISEASE CARE TO HEALTH CARE
Posted by: DrSuess on May 29, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About 100 years ago, America decided to close down its natural health practitioners and herbalists in favor of what is often called “Allopathic medicine”. It then proceeded down a road that can best be described as “pick the most expensive care”. When an herbal treatment and a “medicine” derived from that herb were both available- America choose the “medicine” - the more expensive product. There are many alternative treatments for cancer- but they have all been driven from the country- because they could not be patented.
As a nation we have locked out the alternatives. The most important of these alternatives is preventative medicine. Doctors regard preventative medicine as their “back yard”- and they have tried to lock the door and throw away the key because “it’s theirs” – but they have failed to focus on it. In many cases- they don’t understand it at all. I have heard doctors say- “it’s silly to use herbs to cure cancer”, and they are correct. Once the cancer is in the forms of a physical tumor- it is hard to remove it – BY ANY MEANS. Modern medicine has a poor record here as well. But doctors fail to appreciate that diet, lifestyle and herbs will PREVENT cancer. It is easier to prevent cancer than to cure it.
Ancient Indian traditional medicine has a passage in one of its major texts written thousands of years ago- “The wise man cares for his health all of his life- while the foolish man waits until the disease in incurable- and then spends all of his fortune trying to cure that which is no longer curable”.
American medicine is not health care- it is disease care. As a nation we wait till the disease is fully manifest. By the time a cancer can be seen on an x-ray- the chemical imbalance that created the cancer has existed in the body for a very long time. It is easier to treat this chemical imbalance in the blood- than to cure the cancer. Ancient Indian tradition medicine focuses on catching the cancer when it is still an imbalance in the blood- years before it has become a physical cancer that you can see with your eyes.
Not merely do we need to rethink our method of financing medicine- we need to rethink the whole process from beginning to end. We need to move from DISEASE CARE TO HEALTH CARE. We need to move from crisis medicine to preventative care. In the last years of a person’s life- they will always use tremendous amounts of medical care. The real question is not how we die- it is how we live. Do we use the preventative techniques that can improve the quality of life up until we reach old age- or do we have all kinds of diseases, like arthritis, psoriasis, and migraines, and all the “small” problems that herbal medicine has great treatments for- or do we suffer with then and focus all the “killer” diseases. Modern medicine has not focuses on all the little problems- because it is so locked in all the “killer” disease. Herbal medicine has effective treatments for all of these “little” things. American needs to rethink the whole process from the beginning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» glad to see this the "Editor's Pick" Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Lol. "Barber surgeons." Posted by: ABetterFuture
» enjoy oversimplifying things, do you? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
The Insurance Industry Will Win....
Posted by: CatDad on May 29, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even more than the military-industrial complex, America's massively inefficient, bloated insurance industry provides jobs in every state...millions of jobs directly/indirectly depend on the sustainment of the status quo...and these industries have a lot of politicians in their pockets. Humana, Blue Cross, CNA, Kaiser and the rest won't go down easily.

As I've said repeatedly, they will successful frame any "debate" about reforming health care in the USA around the handful of people who have died while on waiting lists to get operations in Canada...that will be the focus and they'll win on this....this nation is too dumbed-down/entertained to demand more and the media too hopelessly bought out by their corporate owners to provide more realistic debate.

Any "reform," if it ever comes, will be modeled on the bloated insurance/pharma give-away known as the Medicare Drug Benefit....Or, if even that doesn't come...then the "reform" will come in the form of Mitt Romney's scam/gimmicky plan which makes it illegal to not have health insurance...very much like car insurance...so the whole problem is dumped on the end consumer and the whole system is left intact.

I like Michael Moore...but his movies don't seem to effect any changes...Despite Fahrenheit 9-11...Bush still won....In spite of Bowling for Columbine...the NRA has bounced back and has become unimaginably successful...so much so that the common response to the VA-Tech shootings was that the solution should be MORE guns (arm everyone)...even Democratic Majority leader Reid was on the bandwagon.

So now Sicko is coming out....I wouldn't bet on seeing the progressive dream of a single-payer health care system happening in this lifetime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you are right Posted by: zooeyhall
Everything for War, Nothing for the People
Posted by: sofla100 on May 29, 2007 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beyond the issue of a single provider for universal health care is another very important issue. That is, the societal allocation of resources. In America today, that allocation is becoming increasingly skewed towards the military and national security infrastructure. If you count in the intelligence agencies and the US Energy Department's nuclear weapon development and R&D spending, plus the Iraq war, and don't count in social security, over 50% of the US federal budget is for the military and national security. In excess of US $600-800 billion per year, conservatively. And, the amount going into this national security infrastructure continues to increase every year. Therefore, we should conclude America is making its choices clear. National secuity, defense, "American Power Projection," the war in Iraq, (and down the road perhaps one with Iran) are more important than sick and dying children, the poor and indigent. Not only that, much of what the national security spending goes for appears to go directly to corporations such as Halliburton and Bechtel. Worse yet, even with all this spendng, the war in Iraq simply gets worse and worse. However, back to the main point. America is choosing to spend it's money for it's wars and it's military, for it's empire, not for the needs of it's people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment reveals a typical middle class sentiment:
Posted by: zyxwvut on May 29, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
namely that the middle class is measurably above the poor in terms of social status. They are marginally higher at the most, a fact which makes them fearful of falling into the ranks of the lower classes. This comment, implying that the lower classes are responsible for the rotten state of health care in this country, displays such middle class fear of falling into the dregs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The reason for no serious discussion about universal health care.
Posted by: HughScott on May 29, 2007 4:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every newscaster, talking head and political pundit seen on television -- from small TV stations to giant cable networks like CNN – enjoys generous medical benefits.

The same can be said for personnel in radio and the print media. Should all those fortunate people suddenly lose their medical plans and end up in the same desperate situation as millions of middleclass Americans and the working poor, there would be universal health care legislation going through Congress overnight.

Assuming my assertion is true, the big question becomes, “How can we break through upper-class elitism and get the needed nationwide discussion started?”

Beats me, which is another problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ediekoch
Posted by: Edie on May 29, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What needs to be stressed here and underscored is the complacency of those who already have coverage. They all pay high premiums which they have learned to cover, even though it is through their Social Security benefits. Everyone I know that has coverage is oblivious to those who do not. I see the eyes glazing over when I bring this subject up at the many meetings I attend. Many people can't imagine that it is possible to have a Medicare one payer system which would enable them to receive quality health care anywhere they are in this country. They resent the 30% plus that insurance companies gouge out of the system but won't send an email, make a phone call or write a letter to their legislators to change this inefficient system we now have. Wake up all of you and do something for someone else for pete's sake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ediekoch Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: ediekoch Posted by: Raymond Emerson
You can't even choose the golden path anymore with good luck
Posted by: ChathamChick on May 29, 2007 11:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that if you followed the path that everyone told you to follow, graduate...go to college...get a job, then you got employer based health care that for the most part, covered what you needed. That's not even the case anymore. I'm a full time waitress that just graduated college and I make more than most of the friends that I know that have entry level jobs but my employer keeps everyone's schedule to 39 hours or less so that no one qualifies as a full time employee. It says in our employee hand book that full time workers are eligible for health coverage. Any issue that I have is sure to escalate into some larger concern because a preventitive trip to the doctor is something that doesn't factor into my budget with the costs being what they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just another geezer
Posted by: mont on May 30, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AARP journal last month contained an article that stated that having medicare meant a 40% increase in mortality over age 65 as compared to having VA benifits. 40% folks, and the VA is spotty in certain sections of the country and availability is limited. Also, I have several friends who died because of mis-diagnosis and therefore the wrong medications. Another whose drug insurance changed his prescription and he went into seizure. All the medical profession can do for you is prolong your misery in old age after you stupidly chose corporate food all your life. With 1 out of 2 hispanics liable for diabetics and others not far behind, its fast food to the grave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Health insurance" not insurance
Posted by: billwald on May 30, 2007 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Health insurance" is not insurance. It meets no insurance underwriting principles. It doesn't replace an unexpected large loss with a small regular payment. It doesn't set polkcy price according to the individual risk exposure. It pays for pre-existing conditions.

It is a prepaid medical service. Would one expect food costs to improve and be reduced if we took a govt prescription to the Safeway to get our food and the Safeway billed the government?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Problem is So Much More Widespread than This, Too ...
Posted by: stitchwitched on May 30, 2007 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't get BASIC first-line treatment to determine if a lump in my breast is something to worry about or not. I mean, I can't even get a doctor to biopsy it. Part of my story is here, and the worst part is, I'm far from alone. I'm getting get two to three hits per day from searches saying something similar to this: "breast lump not showing on mammogram or ultrasound." Based on the comment one woman left on my blog the first day my post went up, I guarantee that some of the women coming to my blog for answers and or I DO have breast cancer. Women are NOT getting the basic care they need anywhere in the US, and there is simply no excuse for it.

Also please don't miss this story about a veteran . After much of the news you've heard lately, it probably won't surprise you, but maybe you'll be able to help do something about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this will get worse....
Posted by: eosrk on May 30, 2007 8:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the longer we don't have universal healthcare. I can't imagine where it's going to go to whenever we get a plague of something. I mean, it's gonna collaspe....except for those in power, they have their own doctors and hospitals! It's gonna be worser than hell, or worser than Africa, perhaps!

Be assured, it's going to happen, and they know it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cohn Has Made A Major Contribution- BUT.....
Posted by: drricklippin on May 31, 2007 7:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way out of this mess, which no nation on the planet has figured out, is incremental individual AND institutional prevention

But it must be implemented with fairness and compassion
And those who need treatment must NOT be cast aside.

Still so much disease can be prevented so easily if we had the personal and political will to dismantle our disease care system to which we have become needlessly dependent on.

Big PhRMA,Big Insurance and the Hospital Industry salivate as they await 77 million US boomers hitting Medicare which has just begun.

Dr. Rick Lippin
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about people who abuse their health?
Posted by: Landbaron on Jun 3, 2007 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Live fast, eat for total pleasure (plenty of artery clogging trans fat) obesity, how will this behavior be discouraged?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cheap hamburgers vs health care
Posted by: richholland on Jun 4, 2007 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh Oh thinks of the horror of free health care;
i.e.FINLAND,,,, rich and poor and everyone receives free health care of high quality but..
in helsinki there are so many old cars for the taxes are high on car and gasoline......
and then the poor children cannot go every day into MacDonalds
because their mothers cook food and to go for drinks is expensive( high taxes for health care. because the people are so stupid they think that good food and vacation and health care and 36 hour workweek are better then the American System...
Has nobody mercy for CEO and stockholders????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everyboby with a.i.d.s. gets the same treatment as Majic?
Posted by: Landbaron on Jun 4, 2007 3:00 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is pretty expensive!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]