Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

AlterNet. Posted November 9, 2009.


Pollan took on Big Ag and cheap food in a panel discussion, after the protests of a meat industry chairman led to his speech at a University being canceled.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Award-winning food journalist Michael Pollan was invited to speak on October 15 at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo but after pressure from a university donor who is chairman of the Harris Ranch Beef Co., the university changed his speech to a panel discussion.

Pollan, whose works include The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals and In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto is the Knight Professor of Environmental Journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. He's also no stranger to attacks from Big Ag.

Pollan used the forum to continue to challenge people to think about the ways in which we are growing food in our current fossil-fuel dependent system of agriculture. "We're producing ourselves into a hole," he warned the audience.

Joining him on the panel was Gary Smith, the Monford Endowed Chair of meat science at the University of Colorado and Myra Goodman, the co-founder of Earthbound Farm.

What follows is a transcript of the discussion, edited by the AlterNet staff for length and clarity.

Moderator: What is sustainability?

Michael Pollan: I would be remiss if I didn't address a little bit the circumstances surrounding this event, which I don't think we can let pass in silence. But one of the reasons we're doing the panel and not a conventional speech is that there was a real challenge to the university posed by the government, and what is potentially a real threat to academic freedom. And as much as agriculture is what we want to talk about today, academic freedom under girds the ability to have the kind of conversation about agriculture we want to have.

Let me tie this back to sustainability. One of the things we understand from the science of ecology is that the best way to achieve resilience, in any system, is by diversity: biodiversity and intellectual diversity. And that having a diversity of views on this campus -- you know, because universities are the place where these conversations should take place, without any kind of bullying, without any kind of threats. It's critical to trying to figure out how to deal with the challenges that we have.

You could have a monoculture of a university -- one that only tolerated one kind of thinking - and when the world changes, as it inevitably does, you would find yourself in serious trouble. But when you have a lot of different ideas, and they're all nurtured, and they're all brought into contact with one another as we hope to do today, that is where you get the resources to withstand shocks to the system. And god knows those shocks are coming.

Let me just talk about sustainability and the agricultural format, because I really do believe that it's connected. You know, sustainability is a complex concept in one way, but it's also very simple: A sustainable system is one that can go on indefinitely, without destroying the conditions on which it depends -- or without depending on conditions it can't depend on.

So take for example fossil fuels: a system that is highly dependent on cheap oil may not be a sustainable system when oil prices go up. A system that depends on large quantities of free or cheap water has a problem when those situations change.

So sustainability is really -- it's an ideal. There are sustainable systems. A forest. A prairie. I mean, these are sustainable systems; they can go on year after year. They don't need inputs. They don't destroy the conditions on which they depend. But as soon as we get involved and start changing things to feed ourselves, we get into more complicated relationships. So it's a matter of degree, I would say.

Now the question is, 'is the system we have sustainable today?' I just want to offer one little prop to tell you where I think the problem is. I brought along something [laughter] from McDonald's. This is a double quarter-pounder with cheese. Those of you in front can probably smell it. Anyone is welcome to have it [laughter].

Moderator: I believe the students might.

MP: Whoever asks the first question. And I've got some glasses here. Each of these glasses holds six ounces, Okay? It takes a lot of oil to make a modern fast food hamburger. An astonishing amount of oil. And I did a little research to find out just how much went into this.

The oil comes in in several different stages. There is the biggest part, probably: the petroleum needed to create the fertilizer to grow the corn, which is the diet, typically, of these animals. But there's also the moving of that corn, the moving of the burger, the processing, you know, and getting it to a McDonald's near you.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: food, farms, farming, michael pollan, sustainable agriculture

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Academic Ethics or Not
Posted by: billslm on Nov 9, 2009 1:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despicable ethics on the part of the Polytechnic University to allow itself to be pushed around by some money grubbing creep who hates truth and is willing to pull the plug on the university which he obviously considers his own personal toy. If this mysterious benefactor is indeed a graduate, we may conclude that he learned nothing of value in his time there.

Really, it is quite sufficient grounds for dismantling the entire University itself. Such a lapse shows only that the institution has nothing of value to teach. If I were a student there I would formally depart and I would announce my reasons loudly. A degree from such a place is not an honorable recommendation.

Such a weak, spineless, ethical structure is degenerate. In a better world the school would be denied its' accreditation.

And yet, is this an anomalous situation? I think not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Academic Ethics or Not Posted by: jrgjniew
» RE: Academic Ethics or Not Posted by: Jaipurr
» RE: Academic Ethics or Not Posted by: Jeff in CNY
» RE: Academic Ethics or Not Posted by: chrysalis124812
the real price of cheap food
Posted by: vasumurti on Nov 9, 2009 1:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facts excerpted from Diet for a New America (1987) by John Robbins. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, it makes veganism seem as reasonable and mainstream as recycling.

Half the water consumed in the U.S. goes to irrigate land growing feed and fodder for livestock. Huge amounts of water are also used to wash away their excrement. In fact, U.S. livestock produce twenty times as much excrement as does the entire human population, creating sewage which is ten to several hundred times more concentrated than raw domestic sewage. Animal wastes cause ten times more water pollution than does the U. S. human population; the meat industry causes three times more harmful organic water pollution than the rest of the nation's industries combined.

Meat producers are the number one industrial polluters in our nation, contributing to half the water pollution in the United States. The water that goes into a thousand-pound steer could float a destroyer. It takes twenty-five gallons of water to produce a pound of wheat, but twenty-five hundred gallons to produce a pound of meat. If these costs weren't subsidized by the American taxpayers, the cheapest hamburger meat would be $35 per pound!

The burden of subsidizing the California meat industry costs taxpayers $24 billion annually. Livestock producers are California's biggest consumers of water. Every tax dollar the state doles out to livestock producers costs taxpayers over seven dollars in lost wages, higher living costs and reduced business income. Seventeen western states have enough water supplies to support economies and populations twice as large as the present.

Overgrazing of cattle leads to topsoil erosion, turning once-arable land into desert. We lose four million acres of topsoil each year and eighty-five percent of this loss is directly caused by raising livestock. To replace the soil we've lost, we're destroying our forests. Since 1967, the rate of deforestation in the U.S. has been one acre every five seconds. For each acre cleared in urbanization, seven are cleared for grazing or growing livestock feed.

One-third of all raw materials in the U.S. are consumed by the livestock industry and it takes thrice as much fossil fuel energy to produce meat than it does to produce plant foods. A report on the energy crisis in Scientific American warned: "The trends in meat consumption and energy consumption are on a collision course."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the real price of cheap food Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM !!! MORE BURGERS MORE BURGERS !! MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM !!!
Posted by: Laffing Garfield on Nov 9, 2009 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Pollan, get outta the way so I can enjoy all my burgers. If you don't like burgers, shut up but let us enjoy it. Pollan will now have an EGG pie slapped on his face ! AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

morgan1
Posted by: morgan1 on Nov 9, 2009 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sort of censorship and fascist threats has been on-going for decades but really took hold when Reagan came into office. It went nuclear when Bush II claimed the WH with his evil minions. This has occurred at all our higher learning institutes (Yales, Harvard, etc.) as the Far Right and Center Right only wants their message heard. The Agri-Business is part of that group of domestic terrorists along with Big Pharma and the insurance industry. They want us poisoned with the bio-engineered food, prescription drugs, and unaffordable health insurance. Michael Pollan is my hero and we need more and more of his kind to continue the fight against corporate money, greed and power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There deems to be
Posted by: C. Rich on Nov 9, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of censorship these days:

http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/11/the-press-coverage

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grow your own
Posted by: chrysalis124812 on Nov 9, 2009 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm let me think. Although I did not grow all my own food this year and the weather was awful till the end of July, I did grow a considerable amount. I still have loads of greens in a cold frame. How much oil did I use? I drove about 8 miles twice to get horse manure with my Hyundai. 1/2 gallon gas. I used rain water from a recycled barrel, 0. I save my own seeds. I have to replace the plastic on my cold frame every two years. 1 roll lasts for 3 changes, I don't know how much oil that is, but you get my point.
Keeping things widespread in small scale is the key to sustainable success. You can grow food anywhere. Grow your own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That picture made me HUNGRY!
Posted by: maxfrisson on Nov 9, 2009 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW-I am so craving a McD fix right NOW [8am in Texas] - But I don't think they start serving Double Quarter Pounders [hold the ketchup] until 10:30, but I'll be there by 10:40 - oh my gawd I can smell it now!!!!

Polan's number are projections that really aren't based in good science. True meat is not the most efficient food product, NO it is not the reason for all evil either. Could we do better, sure, do we need to all become vegan bicyclists, oh hell no. University was right to balance the program.

I gotta call McDs and see when burgers are up

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That picture made me HUNGRY! Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
U.S. SICKENS PUBLIC WITH UNHEALTHY FOOD THEN DENIES HEALTH CARE
Posted by: smf1403 on Nov 9, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And cheap food has given us all sorts of health care problems. Three quarters of the money we spend on health care in this country goes to treat preventable, chronic diseases. And not all of those are food related, but most of them are." -- MICHAEL POLLAN

Our government in the U.S. should be hanging their heads in shame.

Obama and Congress are sociopaths who justify their actions subsidizing factory farms delivering "food" manufactured with cruelty and pharmaceuticals.

Then, they deny the public health care to "fix" the diseases they have caused.

The whole system is sick and needs a major transformation.

We are all complicit in the cruelty, the disease, and the further entrenchment of unregulated agribusiness.

At the very least, BOYCOTT "products" from factory farms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's not really much "analysis" to it. The government rips off the taxpayer...
Posted by: franklyspanking on Nov 9, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to subsidize corn, potatoes, and soy so that the folks who have bought and paid for your congresscritter can sell corn and soyproducts (burgers and cola) right back to folks who are willing to buy that crap.

But, we appreciate the in depth analysis of the obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food Inc is a movie
Posted by: dadanbetty on Nov 9, 2009 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
which has incredible potential for nonthinking people to evolve from the American diet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One man's poison is another man's war
Posted by: grn1 on Nov 9, 2009 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have taken the step forward. Using solar thermal energy to cook. This energy could be used to take some of the oil out of that burger. It might save a few soldiers who are fighting for the oil cartels. It isn't just about agriculture but about policies that are devolution to rights of existence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few thoughts
Posted by: willymack on Nov 9, 2009 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are those who consider Mc Donald's a gourmet restaurant. As a (former) Greyhound driver, I saw most of my riders flock to that dump, even when there were better places for them to go to.
Economics is definitely an issue, since mcbarf is cheaper than the better places, and is FAST, but it seems the low quality of the "food" from mcpuke should be avoided if possible. I'd rather go hungry for awhile than eat crap.
There's definitely a mental conditioning at play here. Madison Avenue is at its insidious best when the sight of the "Golden Arches" produces a Pablovian response.
We've got to stop burning stuff that produces CO2, while taking drastic steps to reduce the world population, but as one poster observed, we've got our heads up our arses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A few thoughts Posted by: listenoh.61
gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on Nov 9, 2009 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a country where all is contrived to meet the ends of the few. Our media with little exception report only what is spoon fed to them by our government or those in power above them. It seems that information that will truly help a community, an individual or our nation in making informed decisions, are conveniently and decidedly absent or misplaced just long enough to make the course of events and the flow of profits to spill towards the powerful.

We like the cattle that make up the crap burger depicted are being slaughtered just as surly except we get to live for a much longer time and experience a much slower demise. The path that this nation and many others in our global community are on is leading humans off a cliff.

When the populations finally come to see the slide of hand, the smoke and mirrors and any others that come to mind than the true days of reckoning will be upon us. When man finally realizes that no manner of taxes payed or sweat dripped by labor would protect them from the truths that were hidden or confused by others until it was much to late.

This is when there will be hell to pay by all except those of course responsible. Many days I wish that I were born at a different place in time just so I would not see what is coming and know the horrors that our newer generation, each and everyone, will face.

We can only do what we can and no more. Each of us has to try in our own way.

Very informative article. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Makes sense
Posted by: wbeeno on Nov 9, 2009 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dude, that makes pretty good sense to me I like it.

RT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reasons to go veg
Posted by: vasumurti on Nov 9, 2009 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following quotes, facts, figures and statistics are excerpted from Please Don't Eat the Animals (2007) by Jennifer Horsman and Jaime Flowers:

"A reduction in beef and other meat consumption is the most potent single act you can take to halt the destruction of our environment and preserve our natural resources. Our choices do matter: What's healthiest for each of us personally is also healthiest for the life support system of our precious, but wounded planet."

---John Robbins, author, Diet for a New America, and President, EarthSave Foundation

One study puts animal waste in the United States to between 2.4 trillion to 3.9 trillion pounds per year. The United states produces 15,000 pounds of manure per person. This is 130 times the amount of waste produced by the entire human population of the United States.

A 1,000-cow dairy can produce approximately 120,000 pounds of waste per day. This is the functional equivalent of the amount of sanitary waste produced by a city of 20,000 people.

A 20,000-chicken factory produces about 2.4 million pounds of manure a year. Poultry factories are one of the fastest growing industries throughout Asia.

One pig excretes nearly three gallons of waste per day, or 2.5 times the average human's daily total. One hog farm with 50,000 pigs in France produces more waste than the entire city of Los Angeles, and some pig farms are much larger.

Factory farm pollution is the primary source of damage to coastal waters in North and South America, Europe, and Asia. Scientists report that over sixty percent of the coastal waters in the United States are moderately to severely degraded from factory farm nutrient pollution. This pollution creates oxygen-depleted dead zones, which are huge areas of ocean devoid of aquatic life.

Meat production causes deforestation, which then contributes to global warming. Trees convert carbon dioxide into oxygen, and the destruction of forests around the globe to make room for grazing cattle furthers the greenhouse effect. The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations reports that the annual rate of tropical deforestation has increased from 9 million hectares in 1980 to 16.8 million hectares in 1990, and unfortunately, this destruction has accelerated since then. By 1994, a staggering 200 million hectares of rainforest had been destroyed in South America just for cattle.

"The impact of countless hooves and mouths over the years has done more to alter the type of vegetation and land forms of the West than all the water projects, strip mines, power plants, freeways, and sub-division developments combined."

---Philip Fradkin, in Audubon, National Audubon Society, New York

Agricultural meat production generates air pollution. As manure decomposes, it releases over 400 volatile organic compounds, many of which are extremely harmful to human health. Nitrogen, a major by-product of animal wastes, changes to ammonia as it escapes into the air, and this is a major source of acid rain. Worldwide, livestock produce over 30 million tons of ammonia. Hydrogen sulfide, another chemical released from animal waste, can cause irreversible neurological damage, even at low levels.

The World Conservation Union lists over 1,000 different fish species that are threatened or endangered. According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimate, over 60 percent of the world's fish species are either fully exploited or depleted. Commercial fish populations of cod, hake, haddock, and flounder have fallen by as much as 95 percent in the north Atlantic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reasons to go veg (cont'd)
Posted by: vasumurti on Nov 9, 2009 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The United States and Europe lose several billion tons of topsoil each year from cropland and grazing land, and 84 percent of this erosion is caused by livestock agriculture. While this soil is theoretically a renewable resource, we are losing soil at a much faster rate than we are able to replace it. It takes 100 to 500 years to produce one inch of topsoil, but due to livestock grazing and feeding, farming areas can lose up to six inches of topsoil a year.

Livestock production affects a startling 70 to 85 percent of the land area of the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union. That includes the public and private rangeland used for grazing, as well as the land used to produce the crops that feed the animals. By comparison, urbanization only affects 3 percent of the United States land area, slightly larger for the European Union and the United Kingdom. Meat production consumes the world's land resources.

Half of all fresh water worldwide is used for thirsty livestock. Producing eight ounces of beef requires an unimaginable 25,000 liters of water, or the water necessary for one pound of steak equals the water consumption of the average household for a year.

The United States government spends $10 million each year to kill an estimated 100,000 wild animals, including coyotes, foxes, bobcats, badgers, bears, and mountain lions just to placate ranchers who don't want these animals killing their livestock. The cost far outweighs the damage to livestock that these predators cause.

The Worldwatch Institute estimates one pound of steak from a steer raised in a feedlot costs: five pounds of grain, a whopping 2,500 gallons of water, the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline, and about 34 pounds of topsoil.

33 percent of our nation's raw materials and fossil fuels go into livestock destined for slaughter. In a vegan economy, only 2 percent of our resources will go to the production of food.

"It seems disingenuous for the intellectual elite of the first world to dwell on the subject of too many babies being born in the second- and third-world nations while virtually ignoring the overpopulation of cattle and the realities of a food chain that robs the poor of sustenance to feed the rich a steady diet of grain-fed meat."

---Jeremy Rifkin, author, Beyond Beef: The Rise and Fall of the Cattle Culture, and president of the Greenhouse Crisis Foundation

Lester Brown of the Overseas Development Council calculates that if Americans reduced their meat consumption by only 10 percent per year, it would free at least 12 million tons of grain for human consumption--or enough to feed 60 million people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All this production of meat,
Posted by: topview on Nov 9, 2009 2:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and they make it dangerous to consume.
The factory farms and cattle farms create food that is not fit to eat, and by all that production they are causing most of the damage to planet earth.
Corporations are producing poison food and are causing most of the sickness to the humans.
But they are making Millions for Big Pharma and the medical industry.

This is not sustainable. One of these days in the future we will be growing our own food in anyway we can, like, our ancestors did, just to be able to feed ourselves.

I started my own garden this year and I am going to expand it next spring, just to get the food we need to have healthy food to eat.
I have saved some seeds to plant for my next years crop.
I have 2-1/2 acres and I have to fight the wild animals for the space to feed myself, by fencing it to keep the Elk and deer out of it.

Life is just one struggle after another, and I know it is going to get much worse in the future. I'm 76 now and I won't have to worry about it much longer. The young and hearty can take over and join the race, to a not very bright future, with out some very drastic changes being made, and soon.

The person that told MP to shut up, because he wanted his cheap hamburger, is going to be one of the people that will be giving his money to the medical industry,to cure his cancer, just so he can still eat that poisoned food source.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

meat
Posted by: ML561 on Nov 9, 2009 5:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree we could all benefit from eating more vegetables and fruits and fewer fast foods. However, it seems to me that AlterNet is becoming more and more of a militant vegan site, and that is something not only can I not support, but the vegan life, admirable though it may be, is not feasible for the majority of people. Cheap, processed food, sad as it is, is many times the only source of nourishment poor people have.

It would be nice if we all could grow our own vegetables and have access to organic supermarkets. But for a lot of people, especially in poor sections of urban areas, that is not happening. Some have no transportation and must go to local convenience stores where fresh produce is unavailable and food is overpriced. Of course many will stuff themselves with junk food and get fat, then they get blamed for having no self control. If you are poor you can't win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: meat Posted by: grn1
Prepare for More Taxes
Posted by: Gravitas on Nov 9, 2009 6:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I still say this increased focus on junk food in MSM and alternative is to prepare the public for a new tax. Which won't be put to use providing healthier options. Just more in the pocked for Uncle Sam and the power-elite pulling his strings. But it might be easier to push on the public if they believe it is for their own good!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from shit to quality
Posted by: richholland on Nov 9, 2009 8:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the famos English chef James Oliver advices to eat every week some days Vegan.
Then when you eat meat buy quality meat, no factory chemical supermarket shit.

But when you are poor and start selecting THINKING what you buy, what you eat you will find out one day you are free from the brainwashers, free from poverty stricken.
You will loose friends as well like Mr.Complaint, MrBorrowme and mr.Givmeadrink.
You will find new friends.
Remember there are communities where people eat pigs meat ONCE a year at Chines New Year.
Are they unhappy no.

But you should feel quilty you didnt buy MRMCburgers shit burger bacon special this week,,, you are no real Patriot, I will inform the FBI.
OK you are innoncent you bought a Veggieburger and drank Zerocola.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some people love missing the point!
Posted by: kikiriki on Nov 9, 2009 9:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2 Just observations, first I'm glad the panel discussion happened. Hello!! It could've been canceled all together. It wasn't the speech that's ok... I'm not a donor for the University and donors make some peoples dreams come true...The fact is that it happened and the donor I'm sure got the picture.

Moreover, I like meat I need meat, chicken, everything. I’m 38 years old and I'm 110 pounds, I'm the last child of 6 and I'm Hispanic, our culture in the table is meat oriented I wish it was different but it is not.

I don't think this panel discussion was about how much better America would be if we just didn't eat meat.

The reality is that America should star actually developing as a county and become sustainable it self. The country is a freaking mess because it lacks everything we need to be sustainable. America is like the Kodak comp when film became digital Kodak just lagged behind. And I still think now they still lagging behind. Kodak just didn't make it like Canon or Nikon or like other brands did in the market.

For example, look at how we travel. Do we really have to take an airplane everywhere? Where are our electric, solar trains? Where are our electric bullets trains? Yes it was mention that electricity in the US is the biggest polluter of course we use coal like undeveloped countries and or developing countries do...

But America has the entire half of the country that produces enough solar energy to run the entire nation and an awesome electric train system that should connect the economic districts first and of course the rest should follow in a timely manner. I believe having a sustainable way of transporting food and people...will dramatically help with the oil consumption in the food we eat and everything...In addition

A farm can be totally sustainable; the excrement from the cows can be converted into gas that produces heat, fire. The rain water or the water that had to be pumped into the farm should be recycled. Every thing that the farm produces as waste can be re use. The farm should run on electricity from solar not coalar.... (Current energy) plus the gas from the excrement can be use to heat the entire farm if need to even the urine from the cows could be converted to bug repelant and also could be used to clean, desingfect organically nothing goes to waste.

Here is also other ways we can have a sustainable farm. Even the old 1950, 60, 70 steal heavy duty machinery can be re-designed and converted to work in a sustainable way. Actually one of my favorite shows on TV are these 2 English guys that go around England and or other countries, saw one episode made in Spain... what they do is help farmers become sustainable using the old machinery that doesn't work anymore or that they stop using it because it became useless. The machinery is re-designed using simple and innovative techniques example solar panels etc, these GUYS aren’t not only freaking brilliant in my eyes they are my heroes. Sorry I don't know the name of the show I actually watch it here in China's cable. The name is in Chinese characters.

Back to what MP was talking about. Basically is up to us, what kind of morons we are letting run our country? Washington's reform should be our # 1 priority, because things wont change if we keep voting the same crapy groups like if we were retarded.. Republicans and Democrates HAVE TO GO!!!!!along with their prostitudes..the ones that hold the $ for their crapy campains..

How can the nation help the farmers from cow to corn growers become sustainable? The leap is not going to be cheap for them. Most important when is American going to get with the program with sustainable transportation for its people and for our food and goods?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

biodynamics
Posted by: jarbo on Nov 11, 2009 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The notion of making farms self-sustainable is (ideally) found in biodynamic agriculture which was explicated by Rudolf Steiner. A lot of it is good, solid organic practice - a true biodynamic farm by definition meets organic standards - and much is made of closed-loop input/output systems.
Some of it will seem on the mystical side to many (cosmic and star influences on planting timing and crop growth) or will have the soil scientists in a tizzy(bury a steer horn full of manure to turn it into humus, use the humus to make fairly dilute sprays for fertilization) etc.
Like in any other system, there may be practices that should/could evolve through investigation over time rather than regarding the handed-down system as inviolate, but it's definitely worth a google to check out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

8% of the fossil fuels just the beginning of the emissions
Posted by: greenknight on Nov 11, 2009 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Factory farming also depletes the organic matter in the soil - that's soil carbon, to put it another way, and there's more carbon in the soil than the atmosphere. Where does this lost soil carbon go? It becomes CO2 in the atmosphere, of course!

Then there are the nitrogen oxides released into the air due to heavy applications of chemical nitrogen fertilizer. These are extremely potent greenhouse gases, and agriculture is the primary source.

And, of course, there's methane, another potent greenhouse gas. Produced in large quantities by the digestive tracts of cattle that are fed corn, then more is produced in the liquid manure pits they use to handle the vast amounts of waste that confined animal feeding operations accumulate. The latter could be captured for fuel - but generally isn't.

The 8% of fossil fuels that ag uses is just the tip of the iceberg - its contribution to global warming is huge. The good news is, organic farming captures more carbon and puts it into the soil than it releases. Converting all farming to organic would get us most of the way to solving global warming.

That doesn't seem to be the way we're headed, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the key is how to convert something
Posted by: soundwonder on Nov 13, 2009 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed the excrement from the cows can be converted into gas that produces heat, fire. The rain water or the water that had to be pumped into the farm should be recycled.
Every thing that the farm produces as waste can be re use. Rip Blu Ray
The farm should run on electricity from solar not coalar.... (Current energy) plus the gas from the excrement can be use to heat the entire farm if need to even the urine from the cows could be converted to bug repelant and also could be used to clean, desingfect organically nothing goes to waste. M2TS Video Converter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hi
Posted by: somavelina on Nov 13, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a great place------- Cougarmatching.com ------- It's a premiere cougar dating community for older women seeking younger men and young men seeking cougars. Come in, post a message, a picture of yourself and check out the hot photo galleries. You will find someone you like here...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement