Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Top 10 Reasons Why Republicans Should Support the House Health Bill

By Igor Volsky, The Wonk Room. Posted October 30, 2009.


The House health-care bill does much of what Republicans said they wanted. So they've launched a disinformation campaign. Rep. Mike Pence was first out of the gate.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Friday, Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., characterized the entire House health care bill as a "government run insurance 2.0." "I mean, what we are seeing here is, you know, government-run insurance, mandates for businesses, an enormous tax increase, most of which or at least half of which will be paid for by small business owners." But Pence and the Republicans should actually read the bill before dismissing it. For while the party may oppose the bill's provisions to tax the top 0.3% of Americans to fund reform or the new fees imposed on the pharmaceutical industry to help close the donut hole in Medicare Part D, on the whole, the 1,990 page bill is a fairly moderate proposal that incorporates numerous conservative policies.

Here are just 10 reasons for why Republicans should support the House health bill:

1. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR -- DEFICIT NEUTRAL BILL: "Do the American people believe that this almost 2,000 page bill won't add to the deficit?" [Rep. Eric Cantor, 10/29/2009]

HOUSE BILL -- DEFICIT NEUTRAL BILL: According to the Congressional Budget Office, the House bill costs $894 billion over 10 years and actually reduces the deficit by $30 billion and continues to reduce the deficit over the second 10 years.

2. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR -- REDUCE COSTS OVER LONG TERM: "Nevertheless, House Republicans recognize the need to lower health care costs." [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), 9/9/09]

HOUSE BILL -- REDUCES COSTS OVER LONG TERM: Encourages payment reforms that can help lower costs. Requires the Department of Health and Human Services to establish specific benchmarks for expansion of the Accountable Care Organization, Payment Bundling, and Medical Home pilot programs. The bill will also slow the rate of growth of the Medicare program from 6.6% annually to 5.3%.

3. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR -- POLICIES ACROSS STATE LINES: "Interstate competition allowing people to buy insurance across state lines." [Sen. John Thune (R-SD), 9/8/2009]

HOUSE BILL -- POLICIES ACROSS STATE LINES: Allows for the creation of State Health Insurance Compacts -- permits states to enter into agreements to allow for the sale of insurance across state lines.

4. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR -- MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM: "Why not bring about reasonable restrictions and limits on medical malpractice claims to end the era of defensive medicine?" [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IA), 9/9/2009]

HOUSE BILL -- ENCOURAGES MALPRACTICE REFORM: The bill establishes a voluntary state incentives grant program to encourage states to implement "certificate of merit" and "early offer" alternatives to traditional medical malpractice litigation.

5. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR -- HIGH RISK POOLS: "Senator McCain has a proposal sometimes called high-risk pools at the state level…These are efforts I think we can have bipartisan agreement on and deal with the question of pre-existing conditions." [Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), 9/10/2009]

HOUSE BILL -- HIGH RISK POOLS: To fill the gap before the Exchange becomes available in 2013, the bill creates an insurance program with financial assistance for those uninsured for several months or denied policy due to preexisting conditions.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: republicans, health care, healthcare reform, mike pence, government-run health car

Igor Volsky is a Health Care Researcher/Blogger for ThinkProgress.org and The Progress Report at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. Igor is co-author of Howard Dean’s Prescription for Real Healthcare. Reform.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
No need to count to ten.....
Posted by: wrinklemomma on Oct 30, 2009 5:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans only need ONE reason to object to any reform, and they have it. THEY and their paymasters didn't write it, so they cannot support it. They are still listening to a Reagan- Nancy Reagan. They just say "NO!".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What they really wanted: a bill that won't work
Posted by: Perry Logan on Nov 2, 2009 2:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Repubs also got what they wanted most of all--a bill that can't possibly work. I hope I'm wrong about this.

Hating ACORN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOW YOU KNOW
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Nov 2, 2009 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why I despise living in Indiana,....Pence is one of them. if I wanted to find a politician that is 180 degrees from what I believe in .....mikes da man....And the people love,love him. makes ya want to puke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

citations
Posted by: astralman on Nov 2, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there are no citations of where the facts come from. at least page numbers would have helped. how else am i going to cite these facts to moderates and republicans?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can I think of 10 reasons I hate this bill?
Posted by: WhatNow? on Nov 2, 2009 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. It is not single payer!

2. It mandates that people purchase 'insurance' from private companies ensuring that their profits will increase.

3. Some estimates are that the 'public option' if even allowed will cover 3% of the population at most. I can't see that having much influence on premiums and deductibles.

4. Will it do anything to give people the freedom to change jobs without worrying about the loss of coverage? I doubt it.

5. There's no public option that will allow anybody to purchase their insurance from uncle sam.

6. It's another corporate written statute. Do we really need more of that?

7. Dennis Kucinich says, "Is this the best we can do?"

8. Will it really do anything to keep 'insurance' companies from denying coverage or dropping people once they get sick?

9. It looks like it will take more from the poor to give to the rich.

10. Does it really do anything to "to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity"?

That was easier than I thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBSTRUCTIONISTS AT IT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 2, 2009 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we all just face it, the Rethugnikans hate the average American! Unless they are the ones in charge (& then anything goes), they stand against anything and everything that actually benefits the "average American"! As for those "small businesses" that they keep talking about, I actually know some "small business" owners that have told me on more than one occasion that have voiced not only how their taxes keep going up but also their inability to hire extra people because they're paying out too many taxes, so in a way - these "small businesses" are paying for "health-care" that even they can't afford!

Like the man said "follow the money", it will lead you to the crooked every time!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does alternet print these blue dog democrat articles?
Posted by: tomkara on Nov 2, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's yet another example of nonreporting - the real news is the insurance industry won - the "oh my gosh" from the extreme right is just a way to cover their tracks - corporate Amerika is written into the "democratic" house bill and the people lose once again. Alternet - give us the real deal, not cheerleading for the corrupt dems. And maybe more of us will send you donations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement