Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Holy Cow, Is Congress Getting Serious About Real Health Care Reform?

By Peter Dreier, The Nation. Posted October 26, 2009.


There is still no guarantee that a progressive bill will end up on Obama's desk. But the chorus in favor of the public option is getting louder.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

    Social movements are messy, so it is often difficult to know, in the midst of the battle, which side is winning. But in the past month, momentum on healthcare reform has unmistakably shifted as liberals and progressives have taken to the streets, the Internet, the airwaves and the halls of Congress to push for a bold public option, strong regulations on insurance abuses and a progressive tax plan to finance reform.

      The Obama administration and its allies in Congress now understand that permitting the unholy alliance of insurance industry muscle, conservative Democratic obfuscation and right-wing mob tactics to defeat the president's healthcare proposal would write the conservative playbook for blocking other key components of his agenda -- including action on climate change, immigration reform and labor laws. So in just the past few weeks, we've seen a change in strategy, a strong grassroots movement and markedly firmer resolve by the White House and liberal Democrats in Congress.

      The Summer of Right-Wing Rage

      At the end of the summer, pundits were already writing obituaries for major healthcare reform. Particularly during the August Congressional recess, an epidemic of right-wing anger against Obama and his policy agenda -- of which healthcare reform was simply an immediate and convenient target -- captivated the media, which reported disruptions at Congressional town hall meetings as though they were an accurate reflection of public opinion rather than a pep rally for extremists, encouraged by Fox News and talk-show jocks. The right-wingers stoked fear and confusion by warning that Obama's "socialized medicine" plan would create "death panels," subsidize illegal immigrants, pay for abortions and force people to drop their current insurance.

      Republican officials, including Senator Charles Grassley, Senator Jim Demint, Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele and conservative pundits Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Betsy McCaughey repeated these myths. And support for the public option tumbled over the summer in response. In June, 62 percent of Americans told Washington Post/ABC pollsters that they favored a public option. By mid-August, support had slipped to 52 percent. Obama's popularly fell, too, as jobs continued to disappear and the administration's proposals to bail out the banks and the auto industry met with right-wing attacks and public skepticism.

      For months Obama had insisted that any significant reform of the healthcare system include a "public option" -- an expanded version of Medicare that would compete with private insurance companies, pressuring them to reduce costs and providing Americans with greater choice. Republicans made it clear that they wouldn't support any plan that competes with the insurance industry or challenges its runaway costs and irresponsible practices. With huge majorities in both houses of Congress, Obama didn't need to win Republican votes, but he still held out hope for a bipartisan bill. More troubling, Obama discovered that even he couldn't charm the conservative Democrats in Congress into supporting his plan.

      By the end of August the president, unsure of his political footing, was sending signals that he might settle for reform without a public option, assuaging conservative Democrats and the insurance industry but angering many of his progressive supporters.

      The death in August of healthcare reform stalwart Senator Ted Kennedy bolstered the influence of Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, which was drafting its own health reform legislation. Baucus, a darling of the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries, has been particularly opposed to Obama's proposal for a public option.

      In its August 17 cover story, Business Week reported that "The Health Insurers Have Already Won." As if to confirm Business Week's analysis, in mid-September Steve Elmendorf, a lobbyist for UnitedHealth, sent out invitations to a fundraiser at his home for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. That same day, reports from CNN and the Associated Press suggested that Pelosi appeared to back off her nonnegotiable support for the public option.

      Targeting Insurance Industry Giants

      Health Care for America Now (HCAN), a coalition of unions, community organizations, consumer groups, environmentalists and netroots groups such as MoveOn, has been spearheading the reform campaign since the group was launched in July 2008. In Pennsylvania, a combination of HCAN activism and Representative Joe Sestak's primary challenge to the newly Democratic Senator Arlen Specter pushed the incumbent to become a reluctant reformer. (Specter first voiced support for a public option at an HCAN rally in June.) During the summer, as healthcare reform bills moved through Congress, HCAN, MoveOn, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) launched television advertising campaigns, costing several million dollars, that asked Senate and House members in key states to support bold legislation that included a public option.


    Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

    See more stories tagged with: obama, rush limbaugh, pelosi, glenn beck, reid, health reform, insurance industry, public option, town halls

    Peter Dreier, professor of politics at Occidental College, is coauthor of "The Next Los Angeles: The Struggle for a Livable City" and "Place Matters: Metropolitics for the 21st Century."

    Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


    Advertisement
    Advertisement

     

    Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
    Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
    Obama Back Stabs Us Again !
    Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 26, 2009 12:42 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Leaderless: Senate Pushes For Public Option Without Obama's Support

    "President Barack Obama is actively discouraging Senate Democrats in their effort to include a public insurance option with a state opt-out clause as part of health care reform. In its place, say multiple Democratic sources, Obama has indicated a preference for an alternative policy, favored by the insurance industry, which would see a public plan "triggered" into effect in the future by a failure of the industry to meet certain benchmarks."

    Back Stabbing Barry

    Yep, he has done it again. Obama is once again undermining real reform. How many times have we been here? On the cusp ... only to have Obama pull the rug right out from under us?

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » OBAMA SUCKS Posted by: horton
    » NOT TRUE Posted by: dogeatdog
    A wad of used chewing gum
    Posted by: Perry Logan on Oct 26, 2009 3:03 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    If we get any reform at all, it will be despite the President, who has been as dynamic as a wad of used chewing gum.

    How bad is it when the real leadership comes from Congress, while the Prez just lies there?

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    No, an effective date of 2013 is not serious, when Americans can still have 2008!
    Posted by: Newstime on Oct 26, 2009 7:18 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Court claim Democrats are thwarting can deliver Medicare for All effective February 20,2008!

    In a Kaiser Family Foundation poll (Politico article), we find suggestions of inevitable disappointment among the 49 percent of Americans who expected financial aid for arranging health coverage to be available in 2009 or 2010, when in actuality Democrat-sponsored bills envision 2013—after Democrats have opportunity to raise campaign funds for the 2010 and 2012 elections, once again on the promise of health-care enactment.

    But imagine how steamed those Americans will be (just as the 51 percent who expected pre-existing-conditions discrimination to end in 2009 or 2010) when they learn that Democrats have been exploiting the health-reform issue for campaign bucks and election-day victories for upward to 10 years and that, except for the manipulation of a party fund-raiser-turned-judge, the Constitutional (equal health protection) claim of an uninsured working-poor taxpayer in Salamone v. Health Care Financing Administration and Commissioner of Social Security(Oregon District Case # 00-6406) could have delivered Medicare for All years ago.

    Of course, the second article mentioned also reproduces a general statement in the Democrats' own defense: they consider the extended timeline for implementation necessary. And that excuse, in addition to the excuse that Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats have been obstructing efforts to bring in health-coverage expansion, can also be expected to go over big with health-care supporters.

    Why? Because the above-mentioned plaintiff filed a judicial-misconduct complaint against the Clinton-nominated, Democratic judicial appointee involved, and, under Rule 11 (d) of the Judicial-Conduct Proceedings prescribed by the U.S. Judicial Conference, she has been free to take corrective action to concede that equal health protection is certainly a Constitutional right for uninsured taxpayers required to contribute toward the Medicare and other health benefits of complete strangers, while they themselves are forced to go without.

    But, then, in a Memo this Continental News Service editorial columnist sent to the White House 85 days ago through Press Secretary Robert Gibbs' E-mail address, President Obama was reminded that uninsured Americans continue to lose days, weeks and months of potential health-care coverage while the destiny of Medicare for All lies only in the hands of a few Democrats: the judicial appointee, the Chief Judge who could suggest she also make the Constitutional concession, and Mr. Obama, who, as a constitutional lawyer, can also legitimately and privately convey that she made a mistake she needs to correct.

    Originally, the plaintiff sought any of three forms of Constitutionally-prescribed relief: the same health benefits his multiple payroll-tax and income-tax payments helped subsidize for others OR exemption from that taxation, so he and others similarly situated could arrange for health insurance of their own (or contract for health services on an as-needed basis) OR a ruling that Medicare as-is violates the Constitutional principle that taxation must be for a public purpose, not for a health-benefits program protecting a numerical minority of citizens. The plaintiff's actions were in anticipation of actual future need, and when he did require medical care he revised his claim to an effective date of February 20,2008.

    Consequently, if uninsured American taxpayers hear any more from Democrats about fines for not obtaining the coverage it is their Constitutional right to have, anyway, OR about an effective date of 2013, when they could have easily secured coverage in 2008, except for Democrat manipulations, some politicians will be out hunting for new employment.

    By Charles H. Savage/Editorial Columnist
    Continental Features/
    Continental News Service, Inc.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Congress writes laws, the president only signs them
    Posted by: rational_moderate on Oct 26, 2009 7:30 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    I think it might be wise for Obama to sit back and let congress fight it out. If he publicly dictates what he thinks should be in the bill, then he only looks impotent as they do whatever they want anyway.
    I feel confident that Obama would sign a good bill; I can't way the same thing for Bush.
    Even if congress were to develop a single-payer bill, I think Obama would sign it.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    THE STARS HAVE FINALLY ALLIGNED
    Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 26, 2009 8:00 AM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    What are the alligning stars?

    - the recognition that any nation that professes to be civil and moral needs to provide at least BASIC health care to all of its citizens

    - we are really up against the wall economically

    SO US HISTORY IS ABOUT TO BE MADE

    Dr. Rick Lippin
    Southampton,Pa

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    I HAVE HAD IT!
    Posted by: cori on Oct 26, 2009 9:26 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    We are in the middle of a depression.
    health care is broken and ten's of millions
    of lives are at stake! Now they are saying
    any reform won't take affect until 2013
    and won't affect most people who are
    paying more then they can afford for lousy
    health care now! We the people are being
    soooo screwed. And when millions of people
    are losing their homes and jobs,
    they are playing games with our lives.
    I will never vote for any of my reps
    again. I will only vote for those who
    can prove like Bernie Sanders and Rep Kaptur

    That they will work and protect OUR interests
    not special interests!

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Take action for Medicare for All
    Posted by: greenferret on Oct 26, 2009 12:36 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Medicare for all, also known as single payer healthcare, is favored by a majority of Americans.

    How can we convince Congress to enact what the people want?

    Tell your members of Congress that unless they support Medicare for all, you won't support them.

    Take the Medicare For All Pledge now.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Support "Medicare" for ALL?? Gosh! That's crazy!
    Posted by: EmilyCragg on Oct 26, 2009 2:54 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    In case you haven't figured it out yet, the medical profession is a profiteering INDUSTRY that makes money on "visits," "Procedures," and "drugs."

    Never mind, public health practices, private hygiene, nutrition and cleanliness!

    I just as soon as a bunch of HITLERITES run Health Care as have Medicare run it! Because that's what they are: industrial Fascists profiteering off disease!

    They make money on harmful practices like vaccines, mammigrams, invasive tests, dirty hospitals and drug side-effects.

    I'll put my money on simple measures; you folks can take your cancer industry and surgery suites and stuff them!

    Yuck.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    WE ARE LEARNING HOW LITTLE AMERICANS CARE FOR ONE ANOTHER. IF PEOPLE REALLY
    Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Oct 26, 2009 9:54 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    cared they would "storm the bastile". It just doesn't happen. Its embarrassing. They go to church on Sunday and let their neighbors suffer and die. I understand why between 1 1/2 and 2 1/2 million people leave the United States each year.

    Our qualithy of life is now 30th in the world. We are in the awkward position of having to run to catch up. We are still falling behind. We have to stop falling behind before we can start catching up. Do you think the other 29 are going to be sitting still? Do you think that any part of the world is going to sit still and wait for us to catch up?

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    • AlterNetYour turn

    Support AlterNet
    Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


    Feedback
    Tell us how we're doing.

    Advertisement
    Advertisement