Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Rape Is a Pre-Existing Condition? The Heartlessness of the Health Insurance Industry Exposed

By Danielle Ivory, The Huffington Post Investigative Fund. Posted October 21, 2009.


By taking anti-AIDS medicine after a rape, Christina Turner discovered that she had made herself all but uninsurable.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Christina Turner feared that she might have been sexually assaulted after two men slipped her a knockout drug. She thought she was taking proper precautions when her doctor prescribed a month's worth of anti-AIDS medicine.

Only later did she learn that she had made herself all but uninsurable. 

Turner had let the men buy her drinks at a bar in Fort Lauderdale. The next thing she knew, she said, she was lying on a roadside with cuts and bruises that indicated she had been raped. She never developed an HIV infection. But months later, when she lost her health insurance and sought new coverage, she ran into a problem.

Turner, 45, who used to be a health insurance underwriter herself, said the insurance companies examined her health records. Even after she explained the assault, the insurers would not sell her a policy because the HIV medication raised too many health questions. They told her they might reconsider in three or more years if she could prove that she was still AIDS-free.

Stories of how victims of sexual assault can get tangled in the health insurance system have been one result of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund's  citizen journalism project, which is calling on readers to provide information and anecdotes about the inner workings of the insurance industry. The project aims to uncover details and data that can inform the larger debate over how to fix the nation's health care system. As the Investigative Fund  reported in September, health insurance companies are not required to make public their records on how often claims are denied and for what reasons.

Some women have contacted the Investigative Fund to say they were deemed ineligible for health insurance because they had a pre-existing condition as a result of a rape, such as post traumatic stress disorder or a sexually transmitted disease. Other patients and therapists wrote in with allegations that insurers are routinely denying long-term mental health care to women who have been sexually assaulted.

Susan Pisano, spokeswoman for the health insurance industry's largest trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, said insurers do not discriminate against victims of sexual assault and ordinarily would not even know if a patient had been raped.

"These issues you are bringing up, they deserve to be brought up," said Pisano. "People who have experienced rape and sexual assault are victims and we want them to be in a system where everyone is covered."

Turner's story about HIV drugs is not unusual, said Cindy Holtzman, an insurance agent and expert in medical billing at Medical Refund Service, Inc. of Marietta, Ga. Insurers generally categorize HIV-positive people as having a pre-existing condition and deny them coverage. Holtzman said that health insurance companies also consistently decline coverage for anyone who has taken anti-HIV drugs, even if they test negative for the virus. "It's basically an automatic no," she said.

Pisano, of the insurance trade group, said: "If you put down on a form that you are or were taking anti-HIV drugs at any time, they [the insurance companies] are going to understand that you are or were in treatment for HIV, period," she said. "That could be a factor in determining whether you get coverage."

Some doctors and nurses said that the industry's policy is not medically sound. "The chance of a rape victim actually contracting AIDS is very low. It doesn't make any sense to use that as a calculus for determining who get health insurance," said Dr. Alex Schafir, faculty instructor at Providence St. Vincent Hospital in Portland, Ore.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: rape, health insurance, pre-existing condition, aida

Danielle Ivory is a reporter for the Huffington Post Investigative Fund. Her videos and writing have appeared on Democracy Now, The Nation, Alternet, Truthout, and The Huffington Post and the American News Project.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Actually rape is a pre-existing condition....
Posted by: cordas on Oct 22, 2009 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
now before anyone hurls abuse can I explain myself.

Rape has a horrific effect on a woman's mental and can have hugely serious physical implications as well. It is going to make the medical costs for a victim of a horrific crime far greater than if she hadn't been raped. That's just hard nosed reality.

When you have a medical system that is run on a FOR PROFIT basis, then companies that need to provide big profits for shareholders, boss payouts, bonuses e.t.c, that exists in a morally ambiguous (to say the least) business culture then of course the HMOs are going to look at maximising profits by minimising payouts/risk factors.

Its no good complaining about the victimisation of rape victims by HMOs, because the HMO isn't victimising rape victims, what it is doing is what any 'good' business will do.... protecting its bottom line.

To give a metaphorical statement, you don't cure a disease by treating the symptoms..... You cure a disease by treating the disease.....

Coming from the UK the answer to me is obvious.... Socialised health care, that is run/administered by government or a government tasked non profit organisation (such as happens in other European countries).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While we're waiting for the socialized health care we really want...
Posted by: improperly_sedated on Oct 22, 2009 2:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's place the blame where it belongs:

The insurance company shareholders.

Now, I know, we have this pact in a capitalist society: shareholders get the benefits of ownership and none of the responsibility. Holding the passive, dividend check collecting partners accountable for the actions of the people they hired is anathema to the American way of life.

Fuck that.

The shareholders hired people to extort money from us by the threat of sickness and death, and they reap the benefits of this blood money. They hired people to bribe and strong arm our politicians to ensure the continuation of this arrangement.

I blame them first, last, and most. So should we all. They should be identified by the bony finger of a cancer victim wherever they go. They should be pestered relentlessly for medical charity, because it is something they owe the rest of us. We should never forget who they are or the death and misery they have caused us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: spreading the guilt Posted by: improperly_sedated
this is madness
Posted by: cedarriver on Oct 22, 2009 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's already been stated that the blame lies in insurance companies that run as for profit. I am not totally against that idea. am against that idea when it means the insurance company sole goal is profitability.

When did the notion of insurance change. I remember in the 70's I went to work for an insurance company (two weeks...didn't like their tactics of approaching family) and they were busy selling the idea that insurance was there to protect those in need by all of us pooling our resources. I had no problem with insurance sellers making commission, the company making money, but mostly, I liked the idea that the main purpose was the protection of the public.

Clearly, I must have fallen for the rhetoric and not the substance. That's were we need to be, pooling our money, privately or public ally to assure the sick are cared for when needed.

Articles like this might be the strong arm needed to turn America against the companies that intend to rape us as the insured...clearly a violation of all any decent person or company stands for. Good reporting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: this is madness Posted by: cordas
» RE: this is madness Posted by: madmac10
Everyone know that those who get raped asked for it,
Posted by: corey on Oct 22, 2009 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everyone know that those who get raped asked for it, so its their own fault they have AIDS.

(This is the usual statement from the "Right"...I DO NOT believe this!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mob came up with an insurance against fraudulent insurance brokers.
Posted by: Nitestallion on Oct 22, 2009 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is called the double tap system of quality control exercised on the CEO board. It insures that the board will pay attention to requests that no punitive measures be taken against patients with pre-existing conditions.
The method is simple, if the first demonstration of the mistake committed in arrogant actions against the populace for being ill does not take; then action is taken against the next CEO in line until one runs out of CEOs or the hint is taken.

Simply make them an offer they can’t refuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If the cause of any claim occurs even a nano second in the past it is pre existing.
Posted by: grindermonkey on Oct 22, 2009 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Insurance is not for accidents and injuries, insurance exists as a pool of money collected from gullible, paranoid "little people" for the wealthy, elite to bathe in. What is it about AIG that remains unclear?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not especially surprising...
Posted by: agronomo on Oct 22, 2009 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was not aware of this particular manifestation of our "health care" debacle, but I'm not surprised. Insurance companies exist to generate profits from investment and denial of service increases profits. Refusing to insure rape victims is just another element of their overall strategy to reduce costs.
One might think that if these horror stories were to appear more widely that the general public would wake from the dream that our private health system is "the best in the world" and demand the socialized health care that other industrialized nations provide their citizens. However, instead of wider dissemination of stories that would reveal the true nature and motivation of the insurance industry, we are subjected to propaganda that uses the specter of socialism to frighten the public and persuade it to act against its best interests.
Perhaps an organized protest of citizen voters who have been denied coverage, not just rape victims, yelling at Senators from the public balconies would get some fleeting attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Death Bed Insurance Is Available
Posted by: melpol on Oct 22, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Private insurers of health or life cannot be expected to charge low rates for pre-existing conditions. They are in business for profits not losses. But some like Lloyds of London will insure at astronomical premiums even a person on their death bed. Those who have potential health problems must be realistic and accept higher premiums.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Reason Why WE NEED SINGLE-PAYER Healthcare
Posted by: smf1403 on Oct 22, 2009 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is yet another tragic case for why we need single-payer healthcare.

Eliminate the insurance companies. They are bleeding the taxpayers dry literally.

Single-payer healthcare (Dennis Kucinich's plan) is what Congress and Obama enjoy along with all other civilized countries.

Simply stated: Our country is not civilized.
This would be unheard of in other civilized countries.

I am sickened by Congress and Obama's pure greed in continuing to line the pockets of their campaign donors, the insurance industry and leaving people to suffer in this way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most of us have "pre-existing conditions"
Posted by: yankee2 on Oct 22, 2009 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without even getting into the issue of rape, most of us have pre-existing medical conditions, especially the way the insurance industry may define them. Acne is a condition that may disqualify one for insurance. Asthma is another. Headaches could do it, and an STD might, too.

The whole point of insurance is to spread risk over the WHOLE population. Insurance companies violate that principal. They want to eliminate the risk part (to themselves) completely, thereby making themselves that much richer. Wouldn't it be nice (sic) if we could all walk into a casino, and place ONLY winning bets? Well, that is exactly what the insurance creeps want to enforce!

I hate to say it, again, but the problem is that capitalism encourages, and supports, scams like this, which have become business as usual in the U.S. Capitalism encourages maximizing profits, and it doesn't care how that is done. In other words, it is completely immoral. Do we really want to support THAT kind of institution? I say it can pack its bags, and get out. We can do far better, as a society, for ourselves, with a single-payer healthcare plan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ass kickin' time
Posted by: willymack on Oct 22, 2009 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing spectacular or outside the limits of the LAW is needed here.
The banksters and insurance and pharma racketeers need to be dealt with before they completely consume us and any vestige of liberty and democracy we still retain.
They've earned a major comeuppance with their insane GREED and uncaring attitude towards their victims, namely US.
We need to take the biggies to court, convict them, and put their greedy asses in PRISON, along with the other crooks. It's time THEY were the recipient of some abuse for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did anyone Notice
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 22, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone Notice that the Party of NO once again "filibustered" another Bill involving Health Care .This one was to stop Medicare from CUTTING fees paid to Doctors by 21% .
They are asking these people to take a 21% cut in pay to treat Medicare patients .This is OUTRAGEOUS will these SOBs Cut THEIR pay by 21% . They have already screwed Seniors by not having a Cost Of Living Adjustment ( all I know is my property taxes went $80 per month )
I think they are hoping that Doctors will stop treating Medicare cases .
BTW did ANYONE talk about this on the News today ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Playing Doctor
Posted by: WyrdSister on Oct 22, 2009 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...insurance companies examined her health records. Even after she explained the assault, the insurers would not sell her a policy because the HIV medication raised too many health questions."

First, i dont want some pee-on wondering through my medical records. did this person give consent for them to do that? where the hell is HIPPA?

Insurance companies have been acting as doctors for FAR too long! Let's leave medical conditions to the ACTUAL doctor who went to medical school.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes they are heartless - we don't need them
Posted by: greenferret on Oct 22, 2009 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medicare for all, also known as single payer healthcare, is favored by a majority of Americans.

How can we convince Congress to enact what the people want?

Tell your members of Congress that unless they support Medicare for all, you won't support them.

Take the Medicare For All Pledge now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pre-existing conditions are an integral part of every LEGITIMATE insurance system
Posted by: yankee2 on Oct 22, 2009 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YES, insurance companies CAN be expected to charge low rates for people with pre-existing conditions. THAT is the very principal upon which insurance works. Proper insurance works by spreading risk over entire populations, making medical care affordable for everyone, including those with actually need it. Of course we may pay that affordable rate for years without ever using it, but the point is that when we need it, it is there.

However, the insurance companies make a mockery of those principals. They want to eliminate every person who actually needs medical care from their list of customers. Their ideal is to collect huge premiums every month, without paying anything out at all. They have not QUITE achieved that goal, under the law, but we can be sure that they would if they could. As it stands, they leave many who desperately need medical care out in the cold. Their strategy is an obscene corruption of the role it pretends to play.

Commercial business is fundamentally unsuited to providing society with any essential service, especially medical care. Its prime directive, maximum profit, is diametrically opposed to the goal of providing quality health care to every American. Every dollar paid out for care cuts directly into profits, so they will always look for ways to deny or reduce care, or to jack up their rates.

THAT is why we MUST approve a centralized, government (i.e. PEOPLE) run, single-payer system for providing high quality, affordable health care to EVERY American. We, as a nation, can do a far better job of providing medical care for ourselves, than the insurance companies ever would.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This sets a very bad precedent
Posted by: KodiakDon on Oct 22, 2009 11:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sets a very bed precedent. The insurance company is essentially arguing they can deny coverage to anyone whose life experiences increase their likelihood of "disease."

Anybody following the Adverse Childhood Experience studies ( www.acestudy.org/ ) will see that anybody with such a childhood has a significantly increased likelihood of a whole host of medial problems as adults. May as well deny everybody. (I imagine the insurance companies asking seemingly innocuous questions about a person's childhood and denying coverage simply because a person was spanked as a child.)

This practice must end.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She THOUGHT she may have been raped????
Posted by: countingdaisies on Oct 24, 2009 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, did the possible attackers take time to clean her up and douche that thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For all those trained to hate health insurer profits -
Posted by: McGovern72! on Oct 25, 2009 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Myway news Sunday 10/25/09 -

Health insurers posted a 2.2 percent profit margin last year, placing them 35th on the Fortune 500 list of top industries. As is typical, other health sectors did much better - drugs and medical products and services were both in the top 10.

The railroads brought in a 12.6 percent profit margin. Leading the list: network and other communications equipment, at 20.4 percent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hank
Posted by: Truelass on Oct 28, 2009 12:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get this woman and others like her over the border and into Canada, or some other civilized country, and to hell out of this totally fascist undemocratic blot that we call the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Illegal Diseases
Posted by: pbr90 on Oct 28, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's impossible for rape to be a pre-existing illness/condition, isn't it, if rape is illegal?

The insurance company could therefore insure every woman is raped, and make them all uninsurable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Convert MTS with Aiseesoft's ware.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement