Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Step Aside McDonald's, Why Subway Has the Most Fast Food Stores in the Country

By Scott Thill, AlterNet. Posted October 13, 2009.


What Subway's focus on being a healthy alternative to greasy junk foods says about the future of the lucrative fast-food industry.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Restaurant upstart Subway, riding high on the marketing message of healthy fast food, will overtake its titanic competitor McDonald's in American store locations by the end of 2009, with a shocking total of more than 32,300 outlets.

That's something few consumers could imagine before the sandwich chain piggybacked on huge weight loss of morbidly obese Jared Fogle -- who lost 245 pounds by exercising and eating only its sandwiches, in contrast to Super Size Me's Morgan Spurlock, who got fat and sick eating McDonald's grub.

In the process, Subway has managed to carve out a lucrative niche in a perfect storm of fast food and economic recession. Now, Subway has emerged as a healthy alternative in the market place, partially because its modest business model allows it to crawl into the nooks and crannies of our far-flung country that cannot sustain stand-alone restaurants like McDonald's, which depend heavily on drive-through business for its earnings.

"It's amazing," AlterNet's executive editor Don Hazen said after a recent trip. "I found Subways at obscure corners of national parks in southern Utah and attached to convenience stores on Indian reservations in Navajo country, where there were no other fast-food spots within 50-100 miles."

To be fair, Subway has miles to go before it makes nearly as much money as the late Ray Kroc's powerhouse, which pulls in around $2 million per store,  compared to Subway's $445,00 per shop.

But when it comes to the fast-food game, there's something to be said for ubiquity, especially during a recession. But is the meteoric rise of Subway really a byproduct of a marketplace more in tune with health than before? Is Subway a fast-food success because it offers a healthy alternative to the calorie-packed, fat-riddled burgers of McDonald's and more?

"That's part of it," explained Subway spokesman Wes Winograd, whose company's motto has been "Eat Fresh" since 2001. "That's the 'fresh' side of it. The idea of Subway as a healthy alternative came from the fact that we don't fry anything. There's lots of veggies on the sandwiches. The meats are low fat. Things like that."

But the other part of the equation, Winograd said, is public participation, from the sandwich-making to the franchise-building, and all the way to the marketing. "All of our locations are franchise owned," he said. "The sandwiches are made in front of you. The customer participates in what's put on the sandwich, as opposed to other restaurants, where food comes out of the back room."

Those often unsanitary back rooms, and compromised boardrooms, took a serious hit within the last five years after the films Super Size Me, Franny Armstrong's McLibel and Richard Linklater's nasty Fast Food Nation, based on the damning book of the same name by investigative journalist Eric Schlosser, were released.

That anti-McDonald's zeitgeist took serious hold as Subway's persistent marketing of Fogle, which caught fire starting in 2000, was peaking.

The result was a perfect storm of bad publicity for conventional fast-food shops and an open door for upstarts like Subway, whose plate-glass serving stations were loaded with more vegetables than meats and were symbolized by an average Jared ready to transform himself, and the company, into an advertising dynamo.

"When Jared came on the scene, things just got out of hand," Winograd recalled. "It really put us on the map. He had lost 245 pounds on a diet that he designed, which included eating nothing but Subway for about a year and combined with exercise. He went from morbidly obese to healthy, so we put him in some commercials, and it resonated with consumers. People to this day write and tell us that they were inspired by him. People related because he was a regular guy. We didn't ask him to lose weight."

Of course, Subway didn't ask him to tell customers that it might be impossible to lose weight eating nothing but Subway's subs either. A quick look at the calorie count of some of Subway's many sandwiches can convince anyone good at rudimentary math that simply foregoing McDonald's for Subway is about as healthy as the once-fabled Atkins diet.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: subway

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Subway
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Oct 13, 2009 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subway is making money and saving calories because it's a rip-off. Their so-called "subs" are lame, skimpy, and overpriced. If you want a sub, go to a local place that makes real ones, and get plenty of exercise. And if you want your own business, go start one yourself...like a sub shop that sells real food.

The following is a great commentary: http://mybiggestcomplaint.com/subway-sandwiches/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Subway Posted by: slywy
» RE: Subway Posted by: meldada
Have you eaten a sub, lately?
Posted by: sawdust on Oct 13, 2009 4:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first comment is accurate. Subway "subs" are not true subs, don't taste all that great and cost too much for what you might get for the same money in a real sub shop. It is better than McUnfood but a long way from truly healthy or value driven. It is a step up from saturated yuck, but that's all. It is like buying your "organic" produce at the Wal-Mart. Get serious!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Have you eaten a sub, lately? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: USDA and Walmart and Subway too, some endorsements... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
So Why Is An Advert The Lead Article On Alternet?
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 13, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And How Many Bacon Butties Did it Cost?

No Doubt it Will Be in Alternet's End Of Year Accounts of Sandwich Donors

I'm not complaining - everyone's got to eat.

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Healthy food
Posted by: ssbeeno on Oct 13, 2009 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, healthy food is good! Its about time America started thinking healthy. That McDonads garbage will kill ya!

RT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subway CAN help you lose weight
Posted by: tornadorider2002 on Oct 13, 2009 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been dieting since last February. I used to eat lots of fast food, as did my family. Now mostly I cook at home, but occasionally we are out and about and don't have time for us to run home so I can cook.

In those cases, rather than get a greasy burger, we go to Subway. I can eat a 6 inch sub and still maintain my weight loss. Its a good choice considering the alternatives. I don't recommend it every day, but as a way to get some food that won't bloat you or make you gain a few pounds overnight, it's a good choice.

It would be nice if their veggies were grown locally and had more color to them, etc etc, but again, when you're out with your family or friends and can't stop back at home, it's a winner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New types of fast food
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Oct 13, 2009 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad to see this article. Sure, fast food in general is bad and we should cook more at home. But most of us are rushed and find ourselves stuck with Subway at times. I agree with the above posters about supporting local sub shops, which I do in my own neighborhood, but that's not always an option when you're traveling or even just in an unfamiliar neighborhood.

Subway's success indicates strongly that there really are openings for NEW types of fast food franchises, besides the bigger-bigger-bigger model that AlterNet deplores on an apparently weekly basis.

I can imagine a quick vegetarian and/or locavore option taking off, for instance... if the "concept" wasn't too frou-frou.

And I think there is a LOT of appeal in Subway's do-it-in-the-open approach. Seeing the sandwich made in front of you is deeply reassuring at a psychological level.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not Organic Subway?
Posted by: channing on Oct 13, 2009 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Source food is the only reason I won't eat at a Subway. I like the recipe and store-front business model just fine, but when vegetables, meats and breads don't look like vegetables, meats and breads, and there's no 3rd party certification of what those ingredients are really made of and where they are made, I simply bypass Subway, head to the local grocer and buy those ingredients accordingly.

Here is how I think Subway can survive:

First, start building urban indoor organic farms in vacant industrial buildings around the country for all vegetables. Millions of square feet of abandoned post-industrial space exists in every city so it's cheap. Hydroponic technology is super efficient, clean and organic. The confidence-building "window" to food preparation is then extended to the source-food problem that keeps me and many others away. In combination with local farmers, urban-industrial farming is a localized process.

Second, organic livestock is growing, and Subway easily could bully-pulpit a major expansion of this necessary industry by committing itself to a 100% organic meats transition. Start working with the Organic Consumers Association on a national level, and such as the Organic Valley cooperative will find many new members willing to convert if such a major chain is behind it.

I tell my young kids concerning the likes of McDonalds and Subway, that having a good recipe or flavor is not reason enough to eat something... "Rat poison is 90% good food!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subway Lover!
Posted by: ladyoracle on Oct 13, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only get the veggie delite or veggie max with either apple slices or baked lays, but that is the only fast food option for me, except for EVOS which is only in like 3 cities in the whole u.s. Of course it would be nice if the veggies were local or organic, but show me where I can get a healthier lunch for five bucks, and I will try it out, seriously, because I doubt you can. To do any cheaper I have to make it myself and bring a tofu sandwich with me and find a way to refrigerate it, not even an option for many people including myself sometimes. Bottom line, veggie sub costs under $4 for 6 inch, but if I make it myself, materials are costing the same, and that's with free labor. Subway is a winner, so deal with it and don't order the fatteningest stuff, duh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on Oct 13, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is very troubling when a corporation will not disclose where they get their meats and veggies from. They may have a glass partition that separates their workers from us and our germs but I wonder if such a barrier is in place where their food is grown or slaughtered. I also wonder if they are even located in this country and with regulations that would at least give a glimmer of hope that they are processed in a healthy way.

Make your own sandwich or buy local.

Do not feed the corporate beast, no matter how sweet and fuzzy they seem, with your dollars cause it will bite you eventually.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gimmie shelter Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: gimmie shelter Posted by: gimmie shelter
It's still fast food
Posted by: clvngodess on Oct 13, 2009 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, it ain't organic, may not be sustainable, and not "real subs" --guys the product is sandwiches, let's not get semantic. You know where to go to get a good sub with lots of meat, fat, cheese, sauce and calories. It's fast food, period.

And if you are committed to food dogma, like veganism or vegetarianism and you travel about outside of the major metropolitan areas of the US, for instance, your choices are limited when on the go. It's not my first choice, but when I'm in a pinch, I'll opt for a sandwich. No big deal. Options. Freedom of choice. Why do we complain about options?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Health Food? Subway? What?
Posted by: devo11m on Oct 13, 2009 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subway is terrible. All of the subs have tons of salt. They treat their employees like crap. And the deli meats are mostly water. Lame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Health Food? Subway? What? Posted by: Zeugitai
I wish I weren't gluten-intolerant
Posted by: rational_moderate on Oct 13, 2009 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like what I've seen in the evolution of Subway.
For example, they now offer what actually might be whole-grain bread (I'm not sure unless I could see the ingredients).
Years ago, when I was eating wheat, etc., I would've liked to have such a healthy option. In some corners of the food world, the bar continues to be raised as far as healthiness goes. Really, I suppose the spectrum just gets wider as the least healthy options keep on getting worse at the same time.
Perhaps soon, they'll offer some kind of good gluten-free bread too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's The Cost of The Franchise
Posted by: FoonTheElder on Oct 13, 2009 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are there more Subway's than McDonalds? It isn't the food, it's because McDonalds costs 10+ times more to open.

How much does it cost to open a Subway Franchises?

Total Investment: $78,600-$238,300
Initial Franchise Fee: $15,000
Royalty Fee: 8%
Advertising Fee: N/A
Term of Agreement: 20 years

How much does it cost to open a McDonald's Franchises?

Total Investment: $950,200-$1,800,000
Initial Franchise Fee: $45,000
Royalty Fee: 12.5%+
Advertising Fee: N/A
Term of Agreement: 20 years
Renewal Fee: $45K

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» & Available Locations Posted by: felipe
Not a good value for the money
Posted by: Beadmaster on Oct 13, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We used to enjoy Subway sandwiches when our time was short and we didn't have a chance to cook. Then our local franchise got new ownership. Now it's all run by the same family (the counter people used to be college students), and they skimp big time on veggies. I ask for "extra" of something, and they put maybe two more things on the sandwich, and regardless of putting everything possible on there and asking for "extra," those sandwiches are still mighty skimpy. So I stopped going to the local one, which means I pretty much stopped going to Subway altogether, as the extra gas to go to the far away one adds to the cost, unless I happen to be there. Locally, at $5 for a footlong, where I still have to go home to add the extra ingredients, it's not very cost effective.

I sent emails to Subway to complain...twice. They ignored me. Guess how valuable my business is to them?

I don't eat at McDonald's or other fast food dumps at all...really, there isn't anywhere to go for decent food out in my area. Subway was the last holdout, but they now leave a lot to be desired.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subway Is Better Than It Was But...
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair on Oct 13, 2009 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that local shops are better. Here there is a local franchise that blows Subway away for less money (it's called Cousins'). I first tried Subway some 25 years ago when I was living far away from Cousins' territory, and found them insipid, bland and over-breaded. Recently, though, I re-encountered Subway and found their product much improved, though still not a patch on the "real thing". I'm living back in Cousins' land now, and the occasional times I do stop at Subway, while not as odious as my first visits, still make me glad that, with a little effort, there's a better choice a short bus ride away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In addition to subway, here are a couple more recommendations.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 13, 2009 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chipotle
Baja Fresh

Lots of healthy vegetarian choices and customized meal planning to enjoy in all 3.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks. You're correct. Posted by: GuitarBill
» No Worries Posted by: felipe
The last couple of paragraphs probably account for Subway's most recent expansions.
Posted by: franklyspanking on Oct 13, 2009 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A $5 dollar foot long sub sandwich is enough for a 4" sub each for a family of three.

Beats the heck out of your average big mac meal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Fat Folks Are Boycotting Subway
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 13, 2009 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find Subway's commercial's extremely offensive and NEVER buy their products. That emotionally barbaric commercial where one orders "lovehandles" at a fast food restaurant is over the top. It reinforces the stereotype that body size is about lifestyle. It makes fun of a perfectly legitimate body type, I have love handles and there is nothing wrong with them anymore than freckles, and it gives kids permission to mock fat children. Many other people feel the same way and will not touch Subway. Ironically one of the women behind this campaign is a self hating fatty herself. An eating disorder therapist tried to explain why so many found the commercials offensive and she didn't get it. Pathetic.

Furthermore, Subway is far far from healthy. The institution I work at sometimes offers them free when they give us lunch. I remember one week when I was short on cash and accepted. (They were already bought.) There were so salty and processed, I felt like crap!

This article can't be for real. It must be product placement along with some of the more hokie comments!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fast food
Posted by: terry388 on Oct 13, 2009 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MacDonalds and company are not restaurants, they are glorified take-out places.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fast food Posted by: CaliJim
Real Fast Food will Dominate!
Posted by: bh on Oct 13, 2009 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never underestimate the average American's need for crap food. Mac Donald's Wendy's and Burger King are here to stay. In Mississippi the average person is 52 lbs overweight. Screw Subway, give me another double Whopper with triple cheese. Make that two orders of fries. Let's hit Cold Stone for a quart of Rocky Road for a nice topper. Then let's go to Wal Mart so we can save some money on Sodas. What a great country! We can all work and eat at fast food stores in the south, and then for the high paying jobs Wal-Mart will due just fine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

simply foregoing McDonald's for Subway is about as healthy as the once-fabled Atkins diet?
Posted by: CaliJim on Oct 13, 2009 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone's ideological bias is showing. The Atkins diet (which I've never followed, for the record) has been shown to be very effective in losing weight and improving blood results.

I'll split the link into two parts, since the site thinks it's too long a "word".

(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content) (/article/2007/03/06/AR2007030601166.html)

"..."This is the best study so far to compare popular diets," said Walter Willett, chair of the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, because of its size, duration and the small number who dropped out. The findings confirm, he said, that reducing carbohydrates, "especially those with refined starch and sugar like that found in the U.S. diet, has metabolic benefits." It also shows that replacing these carbohydrates with either fat or protein "can improve blood cholesterol fractions and blood pressure," he said...."

Just because you don't want believe it, doesn't make it wrong - said Galileo to the church.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The dark side of Subway subs
Posted by: jaxong on Oct 13, 2009 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a horrible Subway experience this past summer. I ate a vegetarian foot-long at a store in my current home city, and in a matter of hours came down with a wicked case of food poisoning. After a few days of eating nothing but rice, bananas and Gatorade, I was able to go to the Subway website and log a complaint. I soon got a phone call from someone at the store where I'd eaten, and he was obviously working off a script as he tried to verbally browbeat me into admitting that I couldn't have gotten sick from Subway food. I wrote an even longer complaint, asking for someone from Subway corporate to comment, and I got another call, this time from the franchise owner, who pleaded with me to come in and talk to him, because he did not want to lose me as a customer. Which was much better that the first person I'd talked to, but by that point they'd lost me as a customer for life. I will never eat at Subway again. And I have doubts as to how "healthy" the food is at Subway.

I lost 10 pounds overnight on the Subway diet. Ask me how!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They kept Michael Phelps on after the bong photo scandal...
Posted by: ergoat2004 on Oct 13, 2009 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they can't be all bad.

Seriously, I would love to have an all organic, local, free range option for $5.

I try to support these things as much as I can, but I have limited funds, and don't always have $12 to spend on a quick sandwich while I'm out.

Solution, more local organic farmers: youth who can get their own land without bowing to a feudalistic system of mortgages and subsidies that keep them perpetually in debt and impoverished, when doing the most honest work in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most customers don't order the "healthy" subs
Posted by: Wendiego on Oct 13, 2009 11:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Jared ate was 6" subs, no mayo, no cheese, etc. In my experience, when going to Subway with friends/family, most get the 12" sub and don't skip the mayo and cheese. If you look at their list of "healthy" subs, a lot of them are very plain. I am afraid some people may be getting the idea that eating ANY sub at Subway (no matter how fully loaded) is better than eating a small meal at a fast-food place. Of course, the nutrition info is there for the ogling, but so many don't bother.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Impressed
Posted by: hanakwa on Oct 13, 2009 1:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a vegetarian for almost ten years and stopped eating red meat and pork when I was twelve as part of a bet between a buddy and I. I can tell you from a vegetarians perspective that subway sucks when it comes to veggie subs! I hate the limp shredded iceberg lettuce devoid of any nutrition, unripe tomatoes, and that if you don't get a sauce on this and cover it with hot peppers (at least for me) then I would rather not even eat one unless I was truly starving. I think subway has done a good job at using an obese spokesperson to appeal to the 2/3 of the country that is obese, and by trying to get people to change their diets for the better of us all. But, it is still fast food and even though their food isn't fried it can still be full of calories. What about organic or locally grown produce for sandwiches? Side of pesticides and antibiotics with that factory farmed meatball sub? Will I eat subway again? Not preferred and will strongly avoid it. Also, I think a bigger issue was mentioned in this piece. Why in the hell is there a subway in a National Park!? There is no place for this type of consumerism in some of the most beautiful places our nation has left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CLEVER MARKETING
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 13, 2009 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I noticed that the man walking by the Subway store is nice and slim. The people shown going in and out of McDonalds are all huge. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

franchising and healthy fare
Posted by: ZeeBruce on Oct 13, 2009 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McDonalds started moving away from franchising its stores in the 1980's and managers will never produce the results of owners - Sambos found that out as well. But as a food consumer the lack of healthy food is my primary reason for not going to McDonalds. For whole wheat bread, oil instead of mayo, something besides a piece of lettuce and a pickle, I go to Subway. With McDonalds I can get factory chicken stuffed with hormones or a hamburger made from the parts of 8 or more cows produced by a corporation that has no regard for the environment or my health. McDonalds is great for white bread and high fructose corn syrup and artificial flavors and additives and reconstituted onion. Add in the evil conduct of the McDonalds corporation over the years and I find it very difficult to even consider possibly going to one for food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cannibalization of existing outlets
Posted by: fracuss on Oct 14, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the reasons that there are so many Subway locations is that they have regional developers, resulting in the cannibalization of existing locations. They seemingly have no respect for the success of existing locations, and put new locations on top of existing locations. Many franchises are marginally profitable, or losing money. Don’t confuse the success of mother Subway with it’s individual franchisees. While some locations are very successful, they are outweighed by marginal or non-profitable locations.
From Wikipedia, “The 2001 book Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser criticizes Subway's franchising policies. It claims that in the 1990s, Subway was involved in many legal disputes with franchisees, usually over encroachment (overly aggressive expansion, in which two restaurants are so close in location that they end up competing with one another). [Basically, Subway told franchisees to go f*** themselves, resulting in them being the most sued franchise in existence]
The book blames the "Development Agents" who are given the task of growing the company regionally. They retain a percentage of the franchise fee for their local area, and so it is in their best interest to saturate markets with Subway restaurants in a region, despite the effect it will have on that region's Subway locations. Although this may lead to lower profits per Subway location, it leads to overall higher profits in the region, and therefore higher profits for the entire chain and the Development Agent.
Much of Subway's rapid growth can be attributed to its uncommon business model. Unlike most franchisors, the parent company does not operate any restaurants. Local franchisees operate the stores, and in most markets Subway enters into a contract with a franchisee to be its Development Agent for that market. The Development Agent is then responsible for developing new locations, evaluating stores on at least a monthly basis, and assisting franchisees with whatever needs they may have. DAI takes an 8% royalty on all net sales from each store.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement