Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

7 Common Cosmetics Ingredients You Should Avoid

By Jasmin Malik Chua, TreeHugger. Posted September 1, 2009.


Parabens aren't the only nasty no-no to avoid. Here's a list of toxic ingredients that regularly hitch a ride on cosmetics and skincare products.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Consumer choice is a powerful thing. Say "jump or I'll spend my cash somewhere else" and you'll set executives scrambling to use one another as makeshift human trampolines. It's for this reason and this reason alone -- at least for the major corporations -- that we're seeing such a proliferation of products cheerily proclaiming that they're BPA-free. Well, parabens are the bisphenol-A of the beauty industry, from the scary headlines to the happy proclamations that beam at you when a product has kicked them to the curb.

But as we mentioned before, parabens aren't the only nasty no-no to avoid. Here are seven other toxic ingredients that regularly hitch a ride on cosmetics and skincare products. Pay heed to these red flags the next time you're out cruising with your shopping cart -- who knows, perhaps some well-dressed man will approach you to ask if Bill from Accounting could perform some aerial acrobatics for your pleasure.

1. Fragrance

Examine the fine print of most personal-care product labels and you're bound to find "fragrance" (or, if you want to get fancy, "parfum") jostling for room with its multisyllabic brethren. Because they're considered trade secrets, fragrances fall into a colossal loophole in federal law that doesn't require companies to disclose the potentially hundreds of chemicals in a single product's olfactory-tickling formula.

This simple term can obscure hinky substances tied to myriad health problems, from allergies to endocrine disruption. In 2002, three-quarters of the 72 products tested by the Environmental Working Group contained phthalates, plasticizer chemicals linked to birth defects, feminization of infant boys, liver and kidney damage, and infertility. None of the products, which included brands like Cover Girl, Pantene, Dove, L'Oréal, and Revlon, had the word "phthalates" listed on their bottles, which is even more insidious.

2. Polyethylene glycol

Polyethylene glycol, better known by its acronym, PEG, isn't a single ingredient but a class of ethylene glycol polymers that moisturize, keep products stable, and enhance the penetration of other ingredients, both good and bad. PEGs are typically followed by a number correlating to how many units of ethylene glycol they comprise, in the form of say PEG-4 or PEG-100; the lower the number, the more easily the compound is absorbed into the skin.

While PEGs can be mild irritants, they're less than desirable primarily because they help traffic funky chemicals across your epidermis, including a slug of impurities they're often contaminated with. According to a report in the International Journal of Toxicology by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review, pollutants found in various PEG compounds include ethylene oxide (used to manufacture mustard gas), 1,4-dioxane, polycyclic aromatic compounds, and heavy metals (lead, iron, cobalt, nickel, cadmium, arsenic).

3. Nanoparticles

Largely untested, these extremely minuscule particles are usually undeclared on product labels, even though they can be absorbed directly into the bloodstream. In addition to bronzers, eye shadows, and lotions, you can also find them lurking in a large number of sunscreens that use micronized particles of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, which form physical barriers against UV rays. It's on this battlefield that the "nano wars" are at their most feverish.

Although the EWG, after poring over 400 peer-reviewed studies, concluded that the benefits of small-scale zinc and titanium sunscreen ingredients outweighed the potential risks, a recent report by Friends of the Earth, Consumers Union (publisher of Consumer Reports), and International Center for Technology Assessment had a different take. "Consumers must be aware that nanomaterials are being put into sunscreens with very little evidence about their safety and relative efficacy," notes Ian Illuminato, one of the report's co-authors, citing a 2007 Consumer Reports test that the EWG found at odds with its own investigation -- at least for liquid sunscreens.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: toxins, cosmetics, chemicals, parabens, bisphenol-a, skincare

Jasmin Malik Chua writes about sustainable fashion and beauty for TreeHugger.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good article about 10 yrs overdue
Posted by: stellabloo on Sep 1, 2009 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all old news to consumers in the EU.

Some more that didn't make the list:

8. Sodium lauryl sulfate and similar sudsing agents

Sodiun Lauryl Sulfate in Shampoos: The Real Story

9. Chemical sunscreens

The Chemical Sunscreen Health Disaster

10. Plasticizers - found in many cosmetics and skin creams, not to mention shampoos that make your hair 'soft and manageable'

Encyclopedia > Plasticizers

Not Too Pretty: Phthalates, Beauty Products & the FDA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

our face is made of cells
Posted by: the director on Sep 2, 2009 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not what you do to the dead skin cells its what you do to the cells that are forming at the endothelial layer of the skin.
If your cellular biology is healthy your skin will be healthy. We are what we eat not what
we put on our skin.
We study organic sulfur and those who add sulfur back into their diet have reported skin that is healthier and more vibrant, because their cells are hydrated and alive.
Yes they look better, now I've said it.
We are what we eat.


Director
Cellular Matrix Study
Body Human Project

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Look beyond your face Posted by: kettleblack
Chemical lives......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 2, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whomever said "better living thru chemicals" really wasn't kidding! The even sadder fact is that everything we use/eat/live with has chemicals - and with the exploding rates of disease there are still too many that don't want to see the correlation among them! Thanks for the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PEG
Posted by: teon6 on Sep 20, 2009 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PEG, isn't a single ingredient but a class of ethylene glycol polymers that moisturize, keep products stable, and enhance the penetration of other ingredients, both good and bad. PEGs are typically followed by a number correlating to how many units of ethylene glycol 90210 season 2 90210 relay interface circuit parallel port relay interface mobile manuals mobile phones seropol5 they comprise, in the form of say PEG-4 or PEG-100; the lower the number, the more easily th

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement