Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Obama Must Take On the Giant Lobbyists Blocking Health Care Reform

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog. Posted June 15, 2009.


This is one of those battles that define the state of American democracy.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On Wednesday, the American Medical Association came out against a public option for health care. The President reaffirmed his support for it. The next weeks will show what Obama is made of -- whether he's willing and able to take on the most formidable lobbying coalition he has faced so far on an issue that will define his presidency.

And make no mistake: A public option large enough to have bargaining leverage to drive down drug prices and private-insurance premiums is the defining issue of universal health care. It's the only way to make health care affordable. It's the only way to prevent Medicare and Medicaid from eating up future federal budgets. An ersatz public option -- whether Kent Conrad's non-profit cooperatives, Olympia Snowe's "trigger," or regulated state-run plans -- won't do squat.

The last president to successfully take on the giant health care lobbies was LBJ. He got Medicare and Medicaid enacted because he weighed into the details, twisted congressional arms, threatened and cajoled, drew lines in the sand, and went to war against the AMA and the other giant lobbyists standing in the way. The question now is how much LBJ is in Barack Obama.

The big guns are out and they're firing. All major lobbying firms in Washington -- many of them brimming with ex-members of Congress -- are now crawling all over the Hill. Lots of money is on the table. AMA's political action committee has contributed $9.8 million to congressional candidates since 2000, and its lobbying arm is one of the most formidable on the Hill. Meanwhile, Big Insurance and Big Pharma are increasing their firepower. The five largest private insurers and their trade group America's Health Insurance Plans spent a total of $6.4 million on lobbying in the first quarter of this year, up more than $1 million from the first quarter last year, and are spending even more now. United Health Group spent $1.5 million in the first quarter, up 34 percent from the $1.1 million it spent in the first quarter last year. Aetna spent $809,793 between January and the end of March, up 41 percent from last year. Pfizer, the world's biggest drugmaker, spent more than $6.1 million on lobbying between January and March, more than double what it spent last year. It also spent nearly $3.3 million lobbying in the fourth quarter of 2008. Every one of them is upping their spending.

Some congressional Democrats are willing and able to stand up to this barrage. Many are not. They need cover from the White House.

The President can't do this alone. You must weigh in and get everyone you know to weigh in, too. Bombard your senators and representatives. Organize and mobilize others. And let the White House know how strongly you feel. This is one of those battles that define a presidency. But more importantly, it's one of those battles that define the state of American democracy.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, health, democrats, republicans, obama, lobbyists, ama, insurance companies

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Call, Email and Write Congress Now! ... Single Payer Option!
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 15, 2009 12:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fed Officials by ZIP Code

Send an email to all your state Congressmen and women and the President all at once !

Better yet call ... Better yet ... Do Both !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don Quixote
Posted by: Don Quixot on Jun 15, 2009 1:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lobbying is incompatible with democracy. It is nothing short of institutionalised corruption. The US is is a fake democracy, a corporate dictatorship in democratic disguise. Sorry but that is the naked truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA'S HEALTH REFORM WOULD KILL MILLIONS OF OLDER AMERICANS OF ALL RACES
Posted by: joeocho88 on Jun 15, 2009 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is NOT out for the poor and certainly not out for the elderly.

I heard his remarks the other day when he said we needed to abolish medicare and medicaid for senior citizens because he did not want the FUTURE to be unduly BURDENED by caring for the OLD. HE ACTUALLY SAID THAT. SO HOW LONG BEFORE HE GETS RID OF SOCIAL SECURITY WHICH WAS A PROGRAM SET UP TO HELP OLD PEOPLE IN THE FIRST PLACE BY A DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATION.

There was no teleprompter in front of his face either, so i AM SURE HE WAS SPEAKING FROM THE HEART.

MY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHAT KIND OF ELITIST MONSTER HAVE WE ELECTED?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AS MUCH AS I HATE LOBBYISTS, I AM GOING TO HAVE TO GO WITH THEM ON THIS ONE!
Posted by: joeocho88 on Jun 15, 2009 3:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama had better back off.
Big Insurance has a LOT of power.

And I don't like his damned HEALTH CARE WORTH A DAMN.

POOR PEOPLE WOULD BE LEFT TO DIE.

PEOPLE OVER 60 WOULD BE REFUSED MEDICINE AND TREATMENT THAT WOULD PROLONG THEIR LIVES.

AND MERCY-KILLING OF LIVING PEOPLE WOULD BE ALLOWED.

I DO NOT WANT THIS HAPPENING HERE.

THIS ELITIST HID UNDER BLACK SKIN COLORING --WELL BRONZE ANYWAY. HE IS NOT AFRICAN AMERICAN. HIS MOTHER WAS AMERICAN,.HIS FATHER WAS AFRICAN. THEY BOTH CAME FROM WEALTHY ELITE FAMILIES. AND THEY BOTH THOUGHT THEY WERE ARISTOCRATS.

He thought he would be immune to criticism because he would be able to play the RACE CARD if he was ever crossed.

It works well on university campuses.

When he was inaugurated, I hate Bushes and Cheney and Clinton so much, I cried tears of joy when he was sworn in.

I now know his eloquence comes from a teleprompter with someone else writing the lines for him to say.

I now know that he is not wanting what is good for all of the people in OUR COUNTRY!

I now know that he is just going to implement all of Bushes, Clinton and Cheney's policy and let the elites completely bankrupt this country after which time, they all flee and we are left with the CHINESE WHO ARE COMING TO TAKE THE PROPERTY THESE ELITES PUT UP FOR COLLATERAL IN OUR NAME.

It is like putting things into a pawn shop.

THE FOOLS HAD NO IDEA THAT THE CHINESE WERE JUST SHOVELING MONEY TO US WITHOUT ASKING SOMETHING IN RETURN?

THAT SOMETHING IS THE FARMLANDS OF AMERICA AND WE ARE THE PEONS WHO COME WITH IT. SINCE THEY HAVE PLENTY OF PEOPLE OF THEIR OWN AND DO NOT NEED US --HERE COMES THE INVASION!

BUT THE PEOPLE WHO SOLD US OUT WILL ALREADY HAVE FLED THE COUNTRY. THEY WILL BE IN SWITZERLAND,URUGUAY..EUROPE --WHEREVER THE MONEY THAT THEY HAVE BEEN STEALING FROM OUR BANKS AND BROKERAGE HOMES AND BY SELLING DRUGS WILL TAKE THEM...

AND YOU THOUGHT THAT CHINA WAS GIVING US ALL OF THAT MONEY JUST FROM THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS AND NOT EXPECTING ANYTHING IN RETURN?

YOU PEOPLE BETTER WAKE UP!

The Selling of America to the Red Chinese was started by Richard Nixon, may he rot in hell!
And Carter kept on, giving them the Panama Canal when the USA built it in the first place --with no compensation from the chinese!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Don Quixote!!!
Posted by: jstepp590 on Jun 15, 2009 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you say that lobbying is incompatible with democracy you have hit the nail on the head, saying it better than ayone else I've seen here. A lobbyists job description is to get the government to pay attentions to the needs of the few over the needs of the many. They are at the root of almost every problem we have in this country and I want them gone, whether through a Clean Election system or through baseball bats upside the head.

Allowing these lowlifes a "seat at the table" is one of the few mistakes I've seen President Obama make. He is going to have to take them head on and in their face, something that I feel he shouldn't have to do except he has no choice with our current corrupt campaign finance system. If he does he will have my full support and I will back him 150%. If he doesn't he could face his own marginalization.

If one group of these slime beat him on one issue it will encourage the rest of them to fight him all the way, making it almost impossible to get anything done. This is why we have gridlock in Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

meds anyone?
Posted by: jstepp590 on Jun 15, 2009 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, slow down. Fear of the "reds"? This isn't the 60's!

I can tell by your rant above that you truly haven't studied this issue, or most of them actually. Look at both side of it and you'll get somewhere in the middle. I never cared about this issue until I studied it. Now that I realize how screwed up our system is and I want it changed too.

We spend 2x more for our health care than any other country. We only cover 2/3's of our people for that money, if they don't get refused for anything. We rank 39th in health care quality compared to every other first world country, even behind Namibia. Our people are denied care all the time, which is what Nixon was told they made their money from when he allowed the insurance and HMO companies to control our health care. We are the only country that runs our health care system this way and it is failing which other countries are not.

Stop ranting and making emotional statements and start learning about this before you get on your high horse. The statements you just made display a deep level of ignorance of this issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lastams
Posted by: lastams on Jun 15, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Along with acknowledging the overpowering influence of special interests in Washington,
comes this constant refrain of cynical acceptance, as if the system is inevitable.
Perhaps we need remember that things weren’t always this way.
Not so long ago if a Congressman took money that influenced legislation, it was known as a bribe.
Not so long ago, if a Senator took employment from a corporation “donating” to his campaigns, that was known as corruption.
Until and unless we once again make Congress a non-profit organization, then healthcare, the economy,
and a myriad of other problems will never be solved.
Reform is NOT impossible, and we the people have more power than we think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real reform...........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 15, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reform is a must, with 48 million uninsured, and millions "with insurance" that go bankrupt because of an illness there has to be a change! For all of the right wing blather about "competition" and "free choice" why are they sooooo terrified of a public option!? It would seem a "public" plan, would increase "competition" and as 48 million Americans are uninsured, a public option would help us as a nation, because: (1)those that cannot afford the current prices of insurance (and still eat)will now be able to, (2)those that have "previous conditions" that rendered them ineligible will now be able to buy insurance at affordable rates, (3)those that currently "have" insurance just might be able to see their premiums go down because of real "competition"!

For all of the twisted and perverted talk about helping "businesses and families", it really is all empty rhetoric! And as long as Americans continue to parrot the talking points without actually using their own brains to analyze exactly "who is profiteering" and who "has been bought off by the industry" this nation and her citizens will continue to pay the very steep price!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Businesses and Families.... Posted by: Zaratamara
The chances of Obama doing that are the same as a meteorite hitting this planet this year.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jun 15, 2009 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, since when did Barry boy stand up for the people's health care anyway? He was for single payer health care until he got to Washington in 2005 and then he later flipped all the way. What does this same author who was Klinton's "labor" secretary expect anyway? Try supporting 3rd parties for a change. I voted for Nader thrice and since the Democrats have been too busy trying to out-rightwing the Republicans, I feel even more vindicated. Most of the Democrats and Republicans are kissyfaces to those lobbyists blocking health care reform anyway. And as far as Obama preaching "personal responsibility" and repeating the rightwing talking points about bureaucracy involved in single payer and yet caving in to the current bigger bureaucracy involved in spoonfeeding Big Insurance and Pharma, he can KISS OUR ASSES !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Half-baked measures...
Posted by: Zaratamara on Jun 15, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...like the kind endorsed by all these "Meetups" around the country, are just ploys to get US to accept LESS than the necessary measures to insure real Universal coverage, which can only come equitably with Single-payer. We are told it's the best they can do. We are told it's our only chance, and some Public Option is better than none. So the door is left open for Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and lobbyists, including the AMA (which does NOT represent the MANY doctors who also want Single-payer!) to further water down the "Public Option. Our Corporate Whore, Olympia Snowe, has a dandy proposition to give the Insurance Industry another TEN YERAS to screw us before her "Trigger" for a Public Plan kicks in (we know who puts HER panties in a bunch!).
I refused to go to the meetup here in our town after being politely told that Single Payer would NOT be discussed at the meetup...not even discussed! What's the point? I asked. Can't you at least present the facts and let people decide? Can't we at least issue a statement that it's really Single-payer we want, and that the Insurance Industry butt out, but we support Obama's Public Option as a last resort?
Then to find out they were employed for years by the Insurance industry....I just opted to stay in my Garden, for my own good health, because it was clear to me that nothing good would come from that meeting, not even some good information for the many who don't even have a clear concept of what Single-payer means, or who have been propagandized into thinking we're talking about (gasp!) Socialized Medicine when it's only socialized Health Insurance we're talking about...something our Congresscritters ALREADY HAVE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama IS one of the people BLOCKING health care reform - HR 676 now!!!
Posted by: DCostello2 on Jun 15, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Virtually everyone in Washington who ISN'T behind HR 676 is blocking reform - this INCLUDES Obama and Congress. HR 676 is true reform. People talk as if putting the giant health insurance companies out of business is a bad thing. Why? People don't understand what Obama and crew are going to do with this 'public' option. These co-ops are the biggest screw job. The entire purpose of the single-payer, HR 676, is to create a GIANT class that commands LEVERAGE and can force Big Pharma and the rest of the industry to change. By breaking things into small co-ops, you loose the entire advantage trying to be created.

Call Obama and tell him to stop screwing us. Call your Congress person and tell them to support HR 676. Tell them to screw the AMA, screw the Insurance industry, screw Big Pharma - you don't work for them. You work for US!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having for-profit healtcare run by giant corporations & bureaucrats is
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jun 15, 2009 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a sure recipe for the disaster we find ourselves in now! It's yet another sign of the "creeping fascism" that Ron Paul talks of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama wouldn't even take on Max Baucus.
Posted by: John More on Jun 15, 2009 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what makes you think he'll take on the lobbyists who he goes to bed with ? Obama has in fact opposed single payer and made it obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Divide and conquer
Posted by: SufiLizard on Jun 15, 2009 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama needs to get the AMA to switch sides on this issue. Doctors are frequently at odds with both insurance and pharmaceutical companies.

The problem is that many physicians have a legitimate problem with reimbursement.

If we can find a way to make sure family practice physicians and other generalists get fair reimbursement (maybe a wee bit higher than what Medicare currently pays, and a LOT more than what Medicaid pays) we might be able to get doctors and hospitals to break ranks with big Insurance and Pharma.

And that will make this thing much more likely to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HR 676 does not go far enough.
Posted by: Jill 2 on Jun 15, 2009 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reich is of course correct, but his faith in Obama is, to say the least, Pollyannaish. Obama's catastrophic handling of the banking fiasco is a sure enough indice of what is to come with Health care 'reform.' The banks used bailout monies to further line their pockets, even going so far to use tax dollars to hire lobbyists who bribed Congress to stop homeowners from getting renegotiated loans. Fearing to call Obama the phony cipher he is, will get Reich labeled as 'shrill' and deemed an unstable radical, a sure ticket to journalistic ostracism among timid, Democratic party Progressives.

True health care reform only begins with Single payer. The punitive dimension against the AMA, the drug companies and the insurance health profiteers must not be overlooked: They must be nationalized and appropriated –in essence–deprived of all political agency within the disgrace that passes for 'Democracy' in modern America. In short, they must be eliminated as business entities.

Hand in hand with this must come a complete and utter leveling of health care access without downgrading in the least the highest, most technologically advanced and most exigent standards of deliverable medical quality. The rich will no longer be allowed to use their financial privileges to purchase a highly valorized, qualitatively superior health care on a private basis. Bill Gates will go to the same doctors and get the same health care as the denizen of the homeless tent camps.He will be forced to find other ways to spend his trillions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What we need
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 15, 2009 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in ALL quarters is to tell congress, corporations, lobbies, multinationals, This is OUR country, OUR concern is the citizens, the PEOPLE of this country, NOT your profit structure!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bulworth said it all
Posted by: amacd on Jun 15, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A recent NYT report on the health care debate
noted:

“Mr. Obama neglected to mention that some centrist Democrats have qualms about a new government health plan. Senator Max Baucus of Montana, the chairman of the Finance Committee, who is leading an effort to draft a health care bill, said Thursday that the public plan could take the form of an insurance cooperative that would be owned and operated for the benefit of its members, but not run by the government.”

But Baucus’s comment about a “cooperative that would be owned and operated for the benefit of its members” sort of reminded me that the entire United States was founded as “a cooperative that would be owned and operated for the benefit of its members (citizens)” for the benefit of our ‘commonwealth’.

Of course, that was back when the new citizens of this democratic Republic, “of, by and for the people” had just thrown off the British Empire with its indivisible tyrannies of crown political and royal corporatist economic oppressions --- and when the courageous American patriots would never have dreamed that the a similar corporatist political-economic Empire would ever rule their own ‘new-world’ country.

But as the saying goes, “new boss, just like the old boss”.

And so it goes that perhaps the best description of how the insurance and pharmaceutical corporations have captured and usurped iron-handed control of our previous “cooperative” democracy for the benefit of the people is contained in this scene and lines in Warren Beatty’s “Bulworth”:


Bullworth: Yo, everybody gonna get sick someday / But nobody knows how they gonna pay / Health care, managed care, HMOs / Ain't gonna work, no sir, not those / 'Cause the thing that's the same in every one of these / Is these motherfuckers there, the insurance companies!
Cheryl and Tanya: Insurance! Insurance!
Bullworth: Yeah, yeah / You can call it single-payer or Canadian way / Only socialized medicine will ever save the day! Come on now, lemme hear that dirty word - SOCIALISM!

[snip to scene with campaign manager]

Bullworth: What is it exactly you're concerned about, Murphy?
Dennis Murphy: I'm concerned that you stood up in front of three hundred people in a black church and told them that they were not a factor and never would be as long as we remain in the pocket of the insurance lobby!


Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama's no Bulworth Posted by: amacd
WE ALL LOVE TO HEAR OURSELVES TALK
Posted by: cori on Jun 15, 2009 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congressmen and senators need to start a superfund to run so they don't sacrifice our health, safety and welfare for their reelections. The relationship between congress and and lobbyists is very destructive. Myself and many others have been calling our reps and telling them that we will not vote for them again if they don't support a single payer system. We have been posting letters in local papers like the Billings Gazette and the Burlington Free Press telling people not to reelect reps who only work for special interests.This is literally a matter of life and death and now is the time to put the screws to our reps and let them know that they better work for us. We will live longer, have more money in our pockets and be a healthier people. Businesses will stay here and not go over seas. So what have you done beside flap your lips on this blog- call 202 224 3121 and tell you rep you won't vote for them again if they don't support you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

makaainana
Posted by: Makaainana on Jun 15, 2009 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't want free government health care...

I want to form a US taxpayer corporation. We could get about 200 million "employees". We could then give huge campaign contributions to Senators and House Reps.

We could hire a couple of thousand lobbyists. We could blitz the media with slick adds. We could make bad loans and give unearned bonuses to our employees.

Then as we were too big to be allowed to go broke we could get a Trillion dollar bailout with no strings attached.

I know it sounds bizarre, but there is an actual precedent for this.

Then after getting trillions in bail out money we could create free competition for who could bribe the decision makers the best!!! We would reign supreme in the lets buy influence game.

We would play it exactly like they do now. The biggest legal briber gets what he wants. We could win this competition!!!

Just think we could come out on top in the sway Congressional opinion game without even changing the rules. We would just play the present game better because we would have more money.

We could be the biggest power broker, money sloshing, influence buying body in the United States.

We Could bribe our legislators to get the health care we voted for when we voted for Obama.

And, after that battle was won, we could go on to more and more political battles.

We could even create an environment where we would lobby and bribe for a system where "no man is above the law".

We could bribe Congress into doing oversight of the Executive Branch. With enough slush money we could even persuade Congress to not give the President the unrestricted authority to wage illegal wars.

Think about it. If we had huge bailout money and 200 million "employees" we could pay Congress enough money to follow the Constitution and stop degrading the Bill of Rights!!!

I'll bet with enough money we could bribe politicians to live up to their campaign promises, you know like free health care...

My goodness with enough slush money we could even create a DEMOCRACY. We could if we wanted reward politicians for telling the truth, the CIA for not torturing people.

The possibilities for huge money bribery are endless.

We could call it a bribeocracy. Wonderful...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama did not come from an elite family - this is not true - this is propaganda
Posted by: cori on Jun 15, 2009 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
65 other nations have some sort of national health care and their people live longer and arre healthier. A person in the AU has to pay $200 extra per month for the best healthcare. We have ten's of millions with no health care - is that better? If we don't get what we want we need to fight for it. The elephant in the room is our huge military budget and prison system. So we need to fight for it and that is why we need to let our reps know right now that they cannot take away our only safety nets that we paid for all our lives for military funding! And we want what 65 other nations have a single payer system and healthcre that works!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i did, my husband did my daughter and son did and so did my friends
Posted by: cori on Jun 15, 2009 9:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I posted letters to the editor in my local papers too telling them not to vote for a rep who doesn't work for them. We are working hard because this is a matter of life and death for us and our children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National Health Care Standards
Posted by: cdmsr on Jun 15, 2009 9:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First we establish the NHCS Board and require that all Doctors and health care workers belong. The board sets standards of care, acceptable procedures (most of this is already done and need only be incorporated from the states) and a payment scale. It would also mandate digital record keeping.

And (here's the kicker) it would establish a public data base showing every doctor in the country, his record of complaints, success rate of treatment, malpractice suits and outcomes, criminal record, etc.

Let's play hardball with these tin gods and bring them down to Earth.

SINGLE PAYER NOW!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SPREAD THE WORD - TELL YOUR REP YOU WON'T VOTE FOR THEM IF THEY DON'T SUPPORT NAT. HEALTHCARE
Posted by: cori on Jun 15, 2009 9:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WE CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN- WE HAVE TO TELL THOSE SOB'S THAT WE WON'T VOTE FOR THEM AGAIN IF THEY DON'T SUPPORT SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE FOR US - I SPEAK TO PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD EVERYDAY AND NOT ONE PERSON I SPEAK TO WOULD GIVE UP THEIR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOR OURS. ALL OUR LIVES ARE AT STAKE FOR THIS ONE AND THEY SHOULD KNOW THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO ROLL OVER AND PLAY DEAD!!!!! 202 224 3121 /202 456 1111

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is a corporate whore...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jun 18, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and you should not expect much from him.

Either that,or spineless...or both.

Those that say he is a liberal have read his platitudes and not his record or actions as president.

As Bam-Bam becomes a one term president, he not only has ruined the chances for another black to be elected, but has ruined the chances for any true progressive. Who is going to believe that "change" bullsh!t again...oh, I forgot, the Amerikkkan people only listen to rhetoric.

You got what you voted for nothing more, nothing less.

He is a do nothing, water treading Democrap politician, period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE ALL-TIME LIAR MARCHES ON
Posted by: reelman on Jun 20, 2009 7:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a senator, Barack Obama denounced the Bush administration for holding "secret energy meetings" with oil executives at the White House.
But last week public-interest groups were dismayed when his own administration rejected a Freedom of Information Act request for Secret Service logs showing the identities of coal executives who had visited the White House to discuss Obama's "clean coal" policies. One reason: the disclosure of such records might impinge on privileged "presidential communications."


The refusal, approved by White House counsel Greg Craig's office, is the latest in a series of cases in which Obama officials have opted against public disclosure.
Since Obama pledged on his first day in office to usher in a "new era" of openness, "nothing has changed," says David -Sobel, a lawyer who litigates FOIA cases.
"For a president who said he was going to bring unprecedented transparency to government, you would certainly expect more than the recycling of old Bush secrecy policies."
The hard line appears to be no accident.
--

How is this new to a democrat? "Ignore what is said, watch what is done" applies 24-7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement