Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

The Wholesale Sedation of America's Youth

By Andrew M. Weiss, Skeptical Inquirer. Posted May 5, 2009.


Eight million kids today have been diagnosed with mental disorders, and most receive some form of medication. Is this child abuse?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In the winter of 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association published the results of a study indicating that 200,000 two- to four-year-olds had been prescribed Ritalin for an "attention disorder" from 1991 to 1995. Judging by the response, the image of hundreds of thousands of mothers grinding up stimulants to put into the sippy cups of their preschoolers was apparently not a pretty one.

Most national magazines and newspapers covered the story; some even expressed dismay or outrage at this exacerbation of what already seemed like a juggernaut of hyper-medicalizing childhood. The public reaction, however, was tame; the medical community, after a moment's pause, continued unfazed. Today, the total toddler count is well past one million, and influential psychiatrists have insisted that mental health prescriptions are appropriate for children as young as twelve months. For the pharmaceutical companies, this is progress.

In 1995, 2,357,833 children were diagnosed with ADHD (Woodwell 1997) -- twice the number diagnosed in 1990. By 1999, 3.4 percent of all American children had received a stimulant prescription for an attention disorder. Today, that number is closer to ten percent. Stimulants aren't the only drugs being given out like candy to our children. A variety of other psychotropics like antidepressants, antipsychotics, and sedatives are finding their way into babies' medicine cabinets in large numbers. In fact, the worldwide market for these drugs is growing at a rate of ten percent a year, $20.7 billion in sales of antipsychotics alone (for 2007, IMSHealth 2008).

While the sheer volume of psychotropics being prescribed for children might, in and of itself, produce alarm, there has not been a substantial backlash against drug use in large part because of the widespread perception that "medically authorized" drugs must be safe. Yet, there is considerable evidence that psychoactive drugs do not take second place to other controlled pharmaceuticals in carrying grave and substantial risks. All classes of psychoactive drugs are associated with patient deaths, and each produces serious side effects, some of which are life-threatening.

In 2005, researchers analyzed data from 250,000 patients in the Netherlands and concluded that "we can be reasonably sure that antipsychotics are associated in something like a threefold increase in sudden cardiac death, and perhaps that older antipsychotics may be worse" (Straus et al. 2004). In 2007, the FDA chose to beef up its black box warning (reserved for substances that represent the most serious danger to the public) against antidepressants concluding, "the trend across age groups toward an association between antidepressants and suicidality . . . was convincing, particularly when superimposed on earlier analyses of data on adolescents from randomized, controlled trials" (Friedman and Leon 2007). Antidepressants have been banned for use with children in the UK since 2003. According to a confidential FDA report, prolonged administration of amphetamines (the standard treatment for ADD and ADHD) "may lead to drug dependence and must be avoided." They further reported that "misuse of amphetamine may cause sudden death and serious cardiovascular adverse events" (Food and Drug Administration 2005). The risk of fatal toxicity from lithium carbonate, a not uncommon treatment for bipolar disorder, has been well documented since the 1950s. Incidents of fatal seizures from sedative-hypnotics, especially when mixed with alcohol, have been recorded since the 1920s.

Psychotropics carry nonfatal risks as well. Physical dependence and severe withdrawal symptoms are associated with virtually all psychoactive drugs. Psychological addiction is axiomatic. Concomitant side effects range from unpleasant to devastating, including: insulin resistance, narcolepsy, tardive dyskenisia (a movement disorder affecting 15–20 percent of antipsychotic patients where there are uncontrolled facial movements and sometimes jerking or twisting movements of other body parts), agranulocytosis (a reduction in white blood cells, which is life threatening), accelerated appetite, vomiting, allergic reactions, uncontrolled blinking, slurred speech, diabetes, balance irregularities, irregular heartbeat, chest pain, sleep disorders, fever, and severe headaches. The attempt to control these side effects has resulted in many children taking as many as eight additional drugs every day, but in many cases, this has only compounded the problem. Each "helper" drug produces unwanted side effects of its own.

The child drug market has also spawned a vigorous black market in high schools and colleges, particularly for stimulants. Students have learned to fake the symptoms of ADD in order to obtain amphetamine prescriptions that are subsequently sold to fellow students. Such "shopping" for prescription drugs has even spawned a new verb. The practice is commonly called "pharming." A 2005 report from the Partnership for a Drug Free America, based on a survey of more than 7,300 teenagers, found one in ten teenagers, or 2.3 million young people, had tried prescription stimulants without a doctor's order, and 29 percent of those surveyed said they had close friends who have abused prescription stimulants.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, add, stimulants, mental disorder, medicalization, pills, ritalin

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ritalin Acts on the Brain in the Same Way as Cocaine
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on May 5, 2009 12:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Ritalin and Cocaine have different molecular structures both Ritalin and Cocaine act on the brain in the same way by blocking the dopamine reuptake process.

Crush up Ritalin pills and snort them and you will get a Cocaine like high.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: See banner ad at top of page. Posted by: sasquuatch55
w/o the Meds
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on May 5, 2009 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
w/o my meds I would so be sleeping under a overpass right now. No I'm not joking

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you have probably been lied to. Posted by: wisegalah
Big Pharma wins!
Posted by: colinmeister on May 5, 2009 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pharmaceutical companies are in buisness to make drugs and money. The more drugs they sell, the more money they make, therefore "Pushing" drugs onto children is good business.
When have pharmaceutical companies ever worried about negative side effects when these could endanger their profit motives?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hankgeorge
Posted by: hankgeorge on May 5, 2009 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes...this is a Big Pharma scam.

These drugs are, for the most part, no better than placebo and their rampant over-use is appalling.

With a largely servile FDA and Rx company lobbying, this won't change any time soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

all things psychopharmaceutical
Posted by: sunnywater on May 5, 2009 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It can be explained by an unhealthy relationship between some physicians and the powerful medical industry, which forcefully advertise their products in the media.

Parents perceive drugs as a magic panacea for their children's problems and doctors fail to inform them about the other side of the coin.

Many parents do not find time in their tight schedules for their children who, neglected, are prone to various mental problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: all things psychopharmaceutical Posted by: Cory.Goodman
We're not seeing something
Posted by: Urstrly on May 5, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend of mine teaches in Harlem (he's black, has some learning disabilities himself). He says many of the children in his classroom are unteachable when they skip their meds. The parents are obviously ambivalent (or distracted)or they'd see that the kids took them or went off them altogether, but taking drugs sometimes is a dangerous habit. My feeling is that we are not addressing the root causes of kids' distress. There is very little economic or social stability in these kids' lives. Are we just drugging kids to avoid dealing with the deeper problems these kids are having?

And then on the other hand, we have the more upscale parents who are dosing their kids with the same drugs in order to push them to higher and higher achievement. Come to think of it, they're probably economically and socially unstable these days as well.

THe problem is not that drugs can't help some people some of the time but that when it becomes wholesale, then we must look at the societal aspects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't know about statistics...
Posted by: Vaxalon2 on May 5, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're probably right that lots of kids get diagnosed and medicated out of laziness on the part of parents and other caregivers. I certainly thought that was true when my son's second grade teacher tried to tell us he had ADHD.

Then, in a fit of rage, he broke my wife's arm.

At the age of eight.

At that point we decided this went beyond discipline, beyond reward and punishment. After working with several psychiatrists without positive result, we finally found one that was willing to take the time to treat all of us, providing prescriptions where that was necessary and guidance in parenting a bipolar child.

My son is now fourteen, and well on his way to becoming a productive adult. He will never regain the years he lost to his illness, but I thank the Gods that the medicines he needed were there.

So yes, we should evaluate these things with a critical eye, but we should also keep in mind that most parents, physicians, and teachers really do want what's best for their kids. They are the ones making the decisions, not the drug companies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» almost, but not quite Posted by: Cory.Goodman
Enough...........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on May 5, 2009 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally know people that have drugged their children! I often wonder if these well-meaning parents are just taking the expedient route, you know, instead of actually (1)disciplining the child (and yes sometimes spanking is very necessary), (2) spending actual time with the child, (3) talking thru the real issues, (4)allowing waaayyy tooooo much sugar in their diets, (5)allowing children to be children - in case we've forgotten children are supposed to run around screaming at the top of their lungs - it is up to the adults in their lives to teach them when such behavior is appropriate!

I realize that we (the adults) are very busy, however, when we become parents it is incumbent upon us to step up to the plate and be parents! Your children will make friends on the playground, your job is to teach them right from wrong, the moral code you live by, how to tie their shoes, get along with others - sometimes even when they don't want too, and behave in polite society!! When you abdicate that responsibility to a "drug" you've abdicated a major portion of "your job" in helping to form the next generation!

We've allowed ourselves to be over-ruled by these so-called "authority" figures, that really are experimenting on our children! Big Pharma is trying to make money - and make it they do, but at what cost! These drugs are harmful to young developing minds and bodies, that they are being given by (I believe) lazy parents who are choosing the quickest way to calm their kids down is a travesty! That the medical establishment are all too willing (participants) shills in this farce for the drug industry is a catastrophe!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nough........... Posted by: AKD
» RE: nough........... Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Enough........... Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: nough........... Posted by: DaBear
Mental Illness could be a byproduct
Posted by: ismac76 on May 5, 2009 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of dystopia... I tend to view symptoms of so called mental illnesses as being a result of different stressors reaching a critical point where the brain shifts into some kind of emergency mode.

With all of the chemicals we're exposed to many of which could have ambient polypharmacy type effects on each other, MSM such as TV, utilizing increasingly frequent changes in visual perspective, as well as hyping crises at every opportunity, an increasingly appalling disparity of wealth & all the consequences that brings along with the deterioration and job insecurity that stems from neoliberal economics, layer on patriarchy and/or racism for all but white males, oh and climate change among other natural man made disasters.... of course we're all going crazy.

We're stuck on the crazy train, the politicians , lobbyists and their corporate masters are steering it off of a cliff because it will make them and the people they care about rich and since that's apparently all that counts for those people who count, the rest of us are left contemplating this slow motion suicide which seems so completely out of our control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Absolutely it is!
Posted by: Tereska on May 5, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a kid I was depressed and put on medication after medication. Nothing helped. Why? Because my parents were abusive. Any kid in that situation is gonna be "troubled" but the docs either didn't belive me or didn't care. Over 8 years I was on over 20 different meds, most of them not recommended for anyone under 18. I've seen many of these meds become the center of court cases because of their dangerous effects. I went from 100 pounds to over 200 becuase these meds would make me hungry and sleepy all the time. And nothing was fixed until I left home and started living my own life. I've been medication free for 6 years now and don't feel depressed at all. I know there are people who need meds and that's fine but they need to look at why these kids are depressed/anxious/hyper/suicidal before they start writing prescriptions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Absolutely it is! Posted by: troll
No title
Posted by: Gregory Kruse on May 5, 2009 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 62, the son of a character who would be diagnosed with autism if he were a child today, the father of a 12 year-old who is autistic, and certainly autistic myself. My father's father was an alcoholic who farmed reclaimed land on an island off the North Sea coast of Germany. My father drank heavily all his life and lived to be 84. I was encouraged to drink beer by my father from an early age and have found alcohol to be helpful in some ways, but also very destructive at times. Refined drugs for specific purposes and at precise dosages would have been preferable to me had the drugs existed then, and had I been capable of requesting the therapy. I don't intend to encourage my son to take alcohol.
I've been observing children and teachers as a volunteer at the elementary schools for 5 years now. I generally believe that drug therapy shouldn't be used before 6th grade. I do believe in concerted effort to make the best educational opportunities and therapies available to all children. There are those kids, however, who are so disruptive even in kindergarten that it's easy to conclude that they will end up in prison. Some of these benefit from chemical therapy which, though there is some risk of side effects, the risk of incarceration is much greater.
My son hasn't been seen by an MD since he was diagnosed when he was 4. We have scheduled a visit to an MD in Iowa City who specializes in autism treatment and it will be interesting to hear what she recommends for our son. I am glad to have come across this article at this crucial time of decision.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No title Posted by: mtnprivy
Sam
Posted by: StepanD on May 5, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sickens me that the FDA hasn't approved Wild Kratom for its medicinal uses as a pain killer, yet they've approved poisons like Oxycontin and Percoset. Sick! http://www.Kratom.md has info on Wild Kratom's uses in traditional medicine. A friend of mine got over his addiction to Oxycontin thanks to Wild Kratom. It's been used in hospitals in Russia for decades! Why is Russia ahead of us?! Oh yeah! They don't have a big mafia organization called FDA there, paid for and sponsored by the big pharma!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just watching today's commercials and comparing them with the ones 20 years ago,
Posted by: Benn_Miller on May 5, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would say that the retardation of our society has been worked out. Today's drug commercials often have very hasty tones and the coverup attitude is all too obvious. Maybe if we shut off our oil drilling wells out here in LA as well as TX, OK, and AK would there be less of these phoney pills but more of the natural medicines. I would appreciate it if Obama would give up the war on drugs and just legalize all plant herbs including marijuana.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As for kids, don't just blame the drugs. Blame the misleading junk food ads.
Posted by: Benn_Miller on May 5, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the last 20 years, there have been a growing number of kids' commercials from Big Food whereby regular cooking gets mocked at while at the same time, processed junk food is somehow glorified as making kids stronger. Remember those sleazy "Frosted Flakes" commercials making it look as if the kid performed better in sports after eating all that sugary crap? And here's another example, "lunchables" and "happy meals". My niece is such an addict to them and buys into the propaganda that they're "healthy". If our kids are gonna buy into these rotten pills and junk food hook, line, and sinker, our country's future is in serious jeopardy. Rising healthcare costs coming to a location near you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Diet Affects Behavior Posted by: MJ Fields
Metal illness is a natural response to the world we live in.
Posted by: rafaeltoral on May 5, 2009 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The crazy people dont worry me(I am one of they). Its the super-fake-ambivalent-way-to-happy people that scare me. Either they dont care about what they see around them every day, or like many, they are too stupid to notice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» so is not being able to spell. =) Posted by: rafaeltoral
Excessive Meds for Kids is a Symptom of an Even Greater Problem
Posted by: logansafi on May 5, 2009 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no community in America and everything is plastic, for sale, and superficial. Kids need more than that and all they are getting these days are Game Boys, Junk Food, and Pills. The schools are like little prisons and the parks are empty of play. And yet???... America just keeps waving the Flag? Excessive Meds Given to kids is a symptom of one much bigger problem than just what THEY are doing to our children, but what THEY are doing to us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The War on Drugs is what lead to this mess.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on May 5, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of fixing the market to allow all these dangerous artificial drugs, what needs to be done is shutting down the drug war first and foremost. Second, remove all legal barriers against all plants currently being banned despite their harmlessness. Third, time to stop allowing Big Pharma from funding those "just say no" sleazy commercials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

additional reasons for the changes since the 50's
Posted by: oceanmuse on May 5, 2009 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't argue that big Pharma had medicalized childhood in order to grow it's bottom line but there's more to it than that. As the author states our society has changed quite a bit in the last 60 years.

It's not that we have so many more kids w/ mental issues than we did then (although that's very possible due to the changed environment in which we live) it's that we now are more aware of the possible problems. In addition psychological problems were seen as character flaws so there was a strong stigma keeping parents from seeking help.

As a child in the 50's and 60's my ADHD went undignosed. I was smart enough to develop lots of coping mechanisms. Girls often manifest their hyperactivity in chattiness. Like most kids of the era Mom sent us outside to play. Fresh air, sunshine and nature are known to be calming for ADHD sufferers. I was lucky enough to grow up walking distance from a beach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ok, but...
Posted by: jstepp590 on May 5, 2009 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand that having children on medicine at such an early age is dangerous and should be avoided if at all possible. I agree with that.

However, as someone who grew up with severe ADD/ADHD and still have it I think my academic performance and overall quality of life would have been drastically improved with Adderall. I wasn't diagnosed with ADHD until I was almost 40yo, and the one time I took Adderall was the first time in my life that I felt normal, how I imagined normal people must feel. It was an amazing feeling to be in control of my mind without conscious thought, able to have an interesting conversation and not have a hurricane raging in my head.

My point to the above statement isn't to refute the author but to point out that we cannot throw out the baby with the bath water. Some children need these drugs to even be able to sit still and pay attention. Their performance and lives will be directly affected by these factors. I say, if you want to get rid of this problem you have to go after the roots and that is our environmental pollution.

Autism and ADHD are very similar and there is a lot of belief that the rising levels of pollution are directly correlated to the rising numbers of ADD/ADHD and autism, even down to geography. Read this counterpoint article to see what I mean.

http://www.counterpunch.org/higgs05052009.html


This debate cannot be solved on the basis of whether children should be fed pharma chemicals because there are too many factors involved. Until we fix the root problem everything else is simply putting a bandage on a head wound.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am interested in "the availability of less destructive treatments".
Posted by: Sojourner on May 5, 2009 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, except for occasional mention of the alternative, without a single reference of any kind, this writer prefers to rant against the medical/psychiatric/psychological/pharmaceutical enterprise.

One paragraph, nay one sentence describing alternatives would be more effective than pages of such screeds, if only a single parent learned of an option.

If it is easier to push a pill, then is it not also easier to pile on the rhetoric. Drama uber alles is the poison pill of journalism. So, thanks, for nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs verse physical punishment
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on May 5, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone looked into whether controlling behavior through physical intervention (cause pain and suffering) is more effective at modifying behavior? Personally I dont what kind of violence is worse medicating a child (altering neurochemistry without their understanding and informed consent) or slapping their butts (apply blunt force to gluteus maximus muscles). No one really knows the long term neurobehavioral consequences of long term medication of children. A bruise on the butt heals,but how does the brain heal after chemical intervention (if it ever stops)? What is the impact on behavior? I understand that there is a lot of money to be made medicating children and if teachers dont have to or cant modify childrens' behavior then drug companies can. Back in the day teachers and administrators could really whack someone. Now is it up to the parents to whack their childrens brains? I wonder what kind of whacking is worse? Does anyone even know?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Story
Posted by: stellabloo on May 5, 2009 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It started out as a bitter child custody battle with a parent that would settle for nothing less than full custody, right or wrong.

When my 8 yr old son (the best reader in his class) stopped responding to his teacher and let his schoolwork pile up in his desk, I was able to correct the problem with a couple taps (literally) of the wooden spoon. My ex responded by calling social services with a complaint of child abuse.

Four years later, this had escalated into full-scale war. Convinced by his father that he had suffered a lifetime of abuse at my hands and also that I had led his father into financial ruin, my son was transferred (illegally) to another school and then refused almost all contact with me - except for short phone calls to tell me to fuck off and how much he hated me.

After I moved heaven and earth, after hours spent on the phone, camped out in various offices and writing long letters to be sent by registered mail, my son was put into treatment for the threats he had made against me.

The conclusion: my son was ADD and I had not only been physically abusive but abusive in that I had not sought treatment! And if the Ritalin wasn't enough to make my son feel better, he would receive a prescription for Prozac as well!

Fortunately my member of legislature intervened on my behalf during this stunning display of professional quackery - I was at one point threatened by the hospital with a TEAM of lawyers - and today my kid is a normal 16 year old with plans for college and an interest in sports. With a good relationship with his mother. All he really needed to turn his life around was a nice lunch and an afternoon of skiing :.(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That's such a painful story. Posted by: stellabloo
Ya hafta wonder
Posted by: willymack on May 5, 2009 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who's more messed up, kids or nincompoops, calling themselves adults. Chemical treatment of a rambunctious youngster speaks of pathetic incompetence and stupidity to me. Then there's the drug companies, hovering about like vultures. We all know what to expect when we see the buzzards circling nearby. The drug and medical insurance companies keep getting richer, while we all, including our kids just get sicker. Conincidence? Not a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

give me a break
Posted by: inverse_agonist on May 5, 2009 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Toddlers on amphetamines says something disturbing about our culture, yes, but amphetamines are so widely prescribed because they work for most people who take them, ADHD or not. That's why teenagers (and adults) seek them out for fun and for getting things done. Methamphetamine is the devil, but Desoxyn (i.e., methamphetamine) will help your child achieve! Yeah, it probably will. We just spend billions of dollars making it inconvenient to acquire amphetamines, so people go through an elaborate charade with doctors to get them instead, which partly accounts for the increase in amphetamine prescriptions.

Yes, there were fewer accepted mental illnesses in the 1950s. It was 50 years ago. The author would prefer we go back to the "hastily discarded psychodynamic model" instead of using modern psychiatry. Psychodynamic is just a fancied-up term for psychoanalysis, i.e., Sigmund Freud's ideas. Everything is about unconscious conflicts from childhood. We're told a few paragraphs later that diagnostic categories used today are "unfalsifiable and undifferentiable." Because statements about The Unconscious are more rigorous, somehow? There's a reason Freud is taken more seriously in English departments than schools of psychiatry.

We're told that it's "pseudoscientific" to say that neurotransmitters mediate mood and activity. That is absurd. This article exists in the first place because psychiatric drugs, that are known to work by changing various aspects of neurotransmitter systems, alter mood and activity. Alcohol modifies GABA signaling. Alcohol changes mood, as everyone reading this has probably experienced. There, you've demonstrated it experimentally.

It's been understood that a simple "chemical imbalance" is not the cause of mental illness for AT LEAST 20 years, because of therapeutic lag. Prozac increases serotonin levels on day 1, and doesn't help with depression until week 2 or 3. It must be more complicated than "too little serotonin." This is an active area of research, and antidepressants are now thought to work in part by mechanisms related to stress hormones, a growth factor called BDNF, and the birth of new cells in the dentate gyrus. "Chemical imbalance" is a term easily understood by the public, but it's a marketing term, not a scientific one.

It's obvious that genetics and environment interact to cause mental illness. For example, the gene for the serotonin transporter (target of SSRIs like Prozac) comes in a "short" and a "long" form. One of those forms is associated with depression, but only in people who've undergone stressful life experiences. Nobody actually says genetics is everything.

Back to the "spectrum" thing. It's obvious that some people are REALLY depressed, and other people are sort of depressed. Other people are depressed, but not enough that it's interfering with their life. That is a spectrum. Relatives of people with schizophrenia tend to have some of the same cognitive problems as their schizophrenic family members, but they aren't disabled by them. Google the term "endophenotype" for more about this.

The problem with articles like this is that they start by acknowledging actual problems: conflicts of interest in medicine, the horrible parenting readily observable any time you go out in public, or the effects of drugs on brain development. Instead of having a rational, adult discussion of these problems, we're warned about TEH CONSPIRACY!, told blatantly false things about neuroscience, and urged to return to the good old days of Freud and maybe corporal punishment.

The same EVIL psychiatry journals are the ones publishing the papers that demonstrate, you know, that medication and psychotherapy tend to be about equally effective in treating mental illness, or that therapy measurably changes brain function.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» let's talk about that paper Posted by: inverse_agonist
» RE: let's talk about circular reasoning Posted by: inverse_agonist
» lifestyle changes Posted by: inverse_agonist
Wake up fake Lefty anti-psych morons
Posted by: DaBear on May 5, 2009 11:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the winter of 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association published the results of a study indicating that 200,000 two- to four-year-olds had been prescribed Ritalin for an "attention disorder" from 1991 to 1995.

This set up the article as a sham. Anything the author had to say from there on out is discredited. I could dredge up just as much old shit about snake oil idiots too. Andrew, I swear to god, if I ever meet you in public I hope I'm in full blown manic phase (every fourth day I can cycle into superhero mode) so I can kick your fucking ass to the curb, you anti-science fundamentalist asshole!

Here's the thing:

1. stop underfunding and gutting education. If schools had the funding to be flexible like Euro schools our ADD/ADHD and BP kids could go to your fucking meat grinders and be fine off-meds (to a certain degree).

2. start making big pharma invest in ACTUAL R&D and granting scientific research into actual MIs and A-D disorders, instead of rigging a patent system to generate cash cows based on pseudo science horseshit.

3. If you call yourself a Lefty and STILL insist on dissing science and arguing AGAINST genuine treatment and evidence based therapies for those of us who got too much of a genetic good thing, then you're a right wing nutjob in denial and you need to go fuck yourself. Ever hear of that Left wing thing called EMPATHY?! Course not, you're too god damned rich and arrogant to have it.

4. if you're a rich asshole, part of the upper middling and owning class, this is all YOUR fucking fault. You and YOUR peers did all of this and YOU should be held accountable.

I'm so god damned pissed off by this article, it's no wonder my kid's "drugged" just like me. You all drove us to it, you bunch of rich overpriviledged, insensitive arrogant pricks!

Does big pharma fuckup and do the wrong thing? Of course... their owned by rich people!

Do politicans and schools fuck up? Of course, they're all composed and operated by RICH PEOPLE!

Do yuppie parents fuckup? Of course they're RICH PEOPLE!

So quit whining about people who actually need meds (I'm off mine currently, the side effects are worse than the "disorder" sometimes because you rich assholes won't spend the god damned money on R&D to find something that works without making me break out in a rash and all manner of horseshit---can you tell?!). YOU people have no fucking clue what it's like to live with this stuff.

So, shut the fuck up unless you listen to us first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A little from column A and a little from column B
Posted by: fauxnews on May 6, 2009 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I too felt that kids were being way overmedicated and I have worked in special ed and regular ed.

I sought therapy for my son starting at age 4 with speech and OT. He was labeled "sensory integration disorder". Family said "yes, we notice him but figure he will grow out of it".

I fought the teachers for quite a while. I refused to medicate him for this reason of overmedicating kids because teachers don't want to have to work with difficult kids, but he wasn't difficult. He was just spacey and nervous. So I had a psychologist test him and diagnosed anxiety and ADD. I still did not medicate. Then the school did a full diagnostic...brilliant but suffering with anxiety & ADD. Now he is a different kid with those meds! But at least I waited to get full confirmation.

When we were kids, they didn't have the medication. Instead those kids were taunted and thought of as stupid or weird. Having science progress is not a bad thing. So would you turn down treatment for cancer now because it wasn't available "back then"?

Being prudent and careful is the key, not attacking those who really flourish and can be normal, high functioning kids on medication and no longer targeted at school.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The elephant in the room...crappy nurturing of our youth and our screwed up culture.
Posted by: Quist on May 6, 2009 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as we keep treating children like objects, instead of young humans, we are all screwed. Also, if I was a kid growing up in this screwed up culture, I would be pretty messed up myself.

No critical thinking.
No problem solving.
No empathy.
No creative thinking.
No cooperation.
No decent role models.
No bonding.
No mentoring.
No stability.
No tolerance.
No reasonable guidelines.
No understanding.

What the hell are we teaching our kids today?

The U.S. is moving towards the era of idiocracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Norma Druid
Posted by: Norma Druid on May 6, 2009 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Andrew M. Weiss suggests that childhood mental disorders are largely a fabrication of Big Pharma, since the first diagnostic manual published by American psychiatrists in 1952 lists only one childhood disorder. - To hell with the 1952 manual. I was one of those disturbed kids. I was there.
In fact, mental or emotional disorders have a long history in my family. My mother, born in 1920, suffered what we now know as Clinical Depression while in her teens. She also had an impossible to please mother and a drunken father. Several older members of my grandmother´s family had either been carted off to an institution or committed suicide. Mama knew she needed help by the time I was born in 1945, but institutionalization or shock treatments (remember those?) were the only treatment available.
Like any child, I was upset by my mother´s emotional problems and sometimes irrational behavior. What really put the tin lid on things was the birth of my brother in 1952. Childlike, I realized rather early something was ¨wrong¨ with him without understanding what or why. Gradually, my feelings of frustration, anger, and downright hatred made me almost suicidal. Luckily, my pediatrician recognized my condition and arranged affordable care with one of the practicing psychologists in the area. He prescribed a sedative until my condition stabilized.
Meanwhile, there was nothing available for my haggard mother and increasingly out of control brother, who had hallucinations among other things. Finally a UGF funded mental health center with a sliding fee scale was established in my area. My parents attended parent groups, and my brother finally at age 7 got a diagnosis - childhood schizophrenia. We all had various types of individual and group therapy to help us handle the situation, but only common or garden variety tranquilizers were readily available then.
One thing we all quickly discovered was that we were by no means the only desperate family. My folks met college professors and people from the projects to discuss their troubled kids. My teenage therapy group never lacked for members of all social conditions. Oh, yes, the troubles were there alright.
In the late sixties, my brother spent 18 months in the adolescent unit of the local mental hospital. With this treatment and some medication, he became able to live in the community and graduate from high school.
Now, about all those side effects like tardive diskinesia - my brother took Mellaril for 35 years and did have some mild symptoms. Our family doctor, operating from a clinic allergic to possible liability, cut back his dosage. This resulted in my brother driving to another state, throwing his identification in the trash, and deliberately shop lifting to get himself arrested. I took off from work and drove Mama over there to get him out. Yeah, worked out great, didn´t it?
No, I don´t trust Big Pharma, but they didn´t invent emotional illnesses in children. Some, like schizophrenia and autism, are physically based. Autism IS on the rise, quite possibly because of industrial pollutants known to affect the nervous system.
Children suffered mental disorders in the fifties. I was there. I was one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The French Connection
Posted by: theone23ord on May 6, 2009 8:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
iamthewitness.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth About Mental Illness and Disease
Posted by: Lara1967 on May 8, 2009 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truth About Mental Illness and Disease
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIydrSMyNq0

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nfibpat
Posted by: nfibpat on May 18, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it amazing that there is no observation on the potential that the public health policy of "vaccine preventable disease" has not been implicated in this discussion.
When we as a society pound vaccines into our newborns, does it not stand to reason that we might be damaging our babies. Their neurodevelopmental processes are destroyed by toxins, heavy metals, foreign tissues, and a host of damaging additives that serve absolutely no functional purpose in either structure or function.

There are regions in the developing and newborn brains that are called watershed areas. These areas are microvascular circulation that allow only one red blood cell at a time to pass: in with oxygen and nutrients, and out with carbon dioxide and waster products. If these areas are clogged with plateletes or sludging blood, we end up with neurodevelopmentally damaged children and adults. Watch the eyes of our children. If one of them is discongugate, one turned up or in, or both crossed, consider that one of the 12 cranial nerves, or many of them, have been damaged.
This damage can be immediate, delayed, waxing or waning, across multiple organ tissue, and can result in all these diagnoses. We even see SIDs as a consequence of the barbarian practice of vaccination.
Gulf War Syndrome, and HPV vaccine damages causing deaths can also be placed at the alter of modern medicine's profit machine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement