Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

What Are the Chances I'll Die on My Next Plane Trip?

By Ben Sherwood, Huffington Post. Posted February 27, 2009.


Five commercial airliners have crashed or crash-landed in just 10 weeks. But, statistically speaking, you shouldn't be worried.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Five commercial airliners have crashed or crash-landed in just 10 weeks. It began on December 20th when Continental 1404 slid off a snowy runway in Denver. Now, Turkish Airlines 1951 has gone down while landing in Amsterdam, with nine lives lost and 50 seriously injured. It's enough to make you wonder if the sky is falling and whether it's safe to fly.

Today, I turned to one of the world's leading authorities on airplane crash statistics. Arnold Barnett is a professor at MIT who invented a handy numerical value known as Q. It measures your risk of death on your next flight. Barnett, it should be noted, is afraid of flying.

Despite the tragic loss of life outside Buffalo and Amsterdam, Barnett says that commercial jet travel is actually getting safer and safer. For the purposes of understanding risks, he divides the world and its airline carriers into different categories.

For instance, he argues, your risk of dying on your next First-World domestic jet tip is around one in 50 million. That means if you fly domestically in the industrialized world (say, Europe), your chances of dying are one in 50 million. Despite the crash in Amsterdam, this fact doesn't change because Barnett says Turkish Airlines isn't a First-World carrier. (And, as Bloomberg reports, the latest crash was the fourth fatal incident for the carrier in 15 years).

It's worth noting that in the United States, your risk of dying of your next flight is a little better: One in 60 million. In other words, you could fly every day for the next 164,000 years on average before you would perish in a crash.

If you travel outside the industrialized world but still fly on a First-World carrier, your risk of dying increases. In that case, Barnett says, your Q is about one in 15 million. And if you fly on Third-World or former Soviet bloc air carriers, your risk of dying is about one in 2 million.

In short, if you fly in the United States or the major industrialized nations on First World air carriers, your chances of perishing are incredibly slim. If you fly outside the US on non-First World carriers, your chances are still small, but hardly negligible.

In my next post, I'll examine the safest seats on a plane. Is the Times of London correct when it asserts: "Where you sit can save you, Amsterdam air crash shows."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: flying, airplanes

Ben Sherwood (www.BenSherwood.com) is an author and journalist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
In Love with Ukrainian Girl
Posted by: disc golf on Feb 27, 2009 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just what I need to read before I fly out to Ukraine to visit my girlfriend there. Aerosvit airlines is of a former Soviet Bloc country (Ukraine).

One chance in 2 million v. one in 60 million. I was just distressed because their "on-time" performance is not that great. Now I have something else to think about? And I am not a worrier.

Seriously, flying is MUCH safer than driving where in America, you have about a one chance in 100 of dying in a car accident (43,000 died last year on our streets). You also have a one chance in two (that's 50 %) of dying from either heart disease or cancer! This is absurd!

This is why flying is STILL safer (ultimately), than most other activities like eating poor quality food (e.g., regular, commercially raised, NON-organic produce, various artificial chemicals, microwaved food, genetically modified (GM) foods, commercially raised animal products, insufficient intakes of fruits and vegetables, or consuming insufficient intakes of vitamins C and E and other dietary indescretions. Yes, they can and do result in death from other causes like heart disease and cancer. In addition, Americans fail to get enough exercise and watch too much television. Maybe you think I'm digressing, but I'm not. While such activities don't kill us immediately--no one dies from eating a slice of white bread or a bagel--the end result is the same. Poor lifestyle choices kill in far greater percentages than the very few who die in airplane crashes. In other words, most Americans die from the direct result of poor lifestyle choices, while very few die from airplane crashes.

Yes, flying has its dangers, but it is still safer than most anything else we do. (So don't worry Ilona...I'll still see you in 8 weeks on a regular airplane!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Given the "third worlding" of our country, its companies, our services and....
Posted by: Prophit on Feb 27, 2009 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... our technology, I would say we can't count on those stats forever if we don't turn this massive destruction of our nation around.

Look at the food issue and the lack of safety now that we import food, look at the diseases in this country that are reemerging almost to epidemic levels that had been erradicated and why??? Globalizing and regionalizing without the same protections we used to have to protect us from such threats.

Then we deregulated the stock market and we know how that is going, soon deregulating airlines, reducing safety requirements and lessoning maintenance minimums using "cost" as the reason???

I hold out no hope that these statistics during this third worlding process currently going on in this country and Europe, will hold up very much longer.

In FASCISM, (make no mistake about it we are fully now a fascist state) its profits and corporations that rule and not the publics well being... serfs & slaves have no right to such considerations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Safety and our financial difficulties
Posted by: munley on Feb 27, 2009 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True, flying in the "First World" has been safe. My concern is that it continues to be safe in the face of the serious financial troubles afflicting the economy, including air transport. Airlines operate under strict safety regulations, and if past experience during difficult economic times is any indication, they will continue to be safe. But we might be in for unprecedentedly tough economic times, so vigilance on the part of the enforcement authorities (the FAA in the US) is paramount.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is the point of this article
Posted by: teel on Feb 27, 2009 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

poor maintenance
Posted by: sirios on Feb 27, 2009 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have said this before on alternet ,but it might be worth repeating. When i was in the air force[1967] a commercial jet landed at travis AFB in calif for a fuel systems check. I inspected the plane and discovered numerous leaks. i informed the captain that the plane would have to be grounded and repaired. He said "show me the leaks". I did and he responded with "oh, that's nothing, I'm leaving" he promptly fired up the engines and took off. Need i say more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too po' to fly in fancy pants airplanes...
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 27, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I guess there is something positive about bein' too po' to afford to fly afterall. That and I git to keep my liquids and in 40 oz containers! bwhahahahah!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Much as I'd like to
Posted by: jzelensk on Feb 27, 2009 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...take commfort from this article, I come to find out that in the year 2000, 1.1 billion people flew on planes worldwide. So, the odds that are cited in the article mean that depending on the carrier and location, on average, between 18 and 73 people die somewhere each year in a plane crash.

It's misleading to translate one's odds into a statement that you'd have to fly for 164,000 years before you'd be killed "on average". It could be you and it could be tomorrow.

I'll walk, thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Much as I'd like to Posted by: Jayzer
Not helpful
Posted by: ladyoracle on Feb 27, 2009 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must assume that this article is tongue-in-cheek. I live in Malaysia, and my husband does a lot of abroad travelling on Malaysian Air, etc. We took a holiday on Air Asia. If these stats are true, I want to know the sources of the information, and if the writer thinks he's being coy, well he;s actually grossly misjudged the international rreach of Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement