Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Obama's HIV Fix: Syringe Exchange Is a Major Component

By Allan Clear, AlterNet. Posted January 17, 2009.


Regardless of how one might feel about drug users, syringe exchange is effective, is essential and there is momentum for change.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

What if we had a mechanism that stopped the spread of HIV that experts had speculated would work even before the cause of AIDS had been identified and that subsequent scientific enquiry confirmed was effective? We do, that mechanism is syringe exchange.

What if we had national governments dating back to President Ronald Reagan that knew what worked and yet fought against it, lied to the public, bullied local governments and generally saw the spread of HIV as justified, purely because the population that was affected was drug users, and drug use is addressed in the United States by making it as dangerous as possible?

What if men, women and children had been needlessly infected with HIV purely to teach them the "evil of their ways?" And what if we knew that the majority of these people were African American or Latino? Sadly, this is an exact description of the political response to syringe exchange and to the HIV epidemic among injection-drug users in the United States.

A ban on syringe exchange has existed in the United States since 1988, when Congress prohibited funding to support syringe exchange. In order to overturn the ban, it had been incumbent on the surgeon general to determine that syringe exchange prevents the spread of HIV and does not increase drug use. Evidence to support these conditions has been met repeatedly.

In 1998, under President Bill Clinton, Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala certified scientific evidence in support of syringe exchange as a valid public-health intervention, however Clinton did not act to have the ban lifted. The irony is that because of the ban, syringe-exchange research exists in abundance, and it is irrefutable that it is an effective means to stop the spread of HIV.

Not only is syringe exchange effective in halting the transmission of HIV, evidence from New York demonstrates that hepatitis C (HCV) transmission rates among injection-drug users can also be significantly lowered. The incidence of HCV infection among drug injectors has begun to drop from 80 percent to below 40 percent among newer injectors.

Harm-reduction services, such as syringe exchange, promote the prevention of HCV, as well as make medical treatment and social services more readily available to people who are living with HCV. The maintenance of the ban on syringe exchange callously excludes drug users from receiving essential prevention-and-intervention services and carries a symbolic dimension that delegitimizes syringe exchange and undermines public health advocacy efforts.

Regardless of how one might feel about drug users, syringe exchange is effective, is essential and there is momentum for change.

During the recent presidential campaign, each of the Democratic candidates endorsed removing the federal ban during their term in office. One of the candidates was elected president, and another was appointed secretary of state. President-elect Barack Obama's HIV platform says he will "support legislation that would lift the ban on federal funding for syringe exchange as a strategy to reduce HIV transmission among injection-drug users and their partners and children." On Jan. 6, 2009, Bronx Democratic Congressman Jose Serrano, along with 28 sponsors, introduced into Congress a bill -- HR 179, the Community AIDS and Hepatitis Prevention Act of 2009 -- to lift the ban.

The time to act is now. We need to call and to write our congressional members. We need to insist that the United States joins the rank of syringe-exchange-enlightened countries such as Australia, Holland, Canada, the U.K., Iran (yes, Iran), Moldova, and others. The damage that has been wreaked over the last 20 years cannot be undone, but a new direction can be forged. It is imperative that we participate in cultivating a new course of action and participate in the righting of wrongs.

Help lift the federal ban on the funding of syringe exchange.

 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drug reform, needle exchange, syringe

Allan Clear is the executive director of the Harm Reduction Coalition.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
STD on the rise
Posted by: stdgirl on Jan 17, 2009 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bad news!!!
CDC says STD is on the rise!
I think that's why more and more people living with STD join the STD dating site
stdslove.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moralistic and Self-Righteous
Posted by: DrBrian on Jan 17, 2009 11:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Needle exchange is, as the article says, a proven public health measure that can save lives. The conservatives rejected it, along with condoms, preferring ineffective, self-righteous, moralistic strategies that have cost many lives and cost millions of dollars in treatment and indirect losses.

The Mexico City Policy of the Bush administration cuts off funding to organizations that provide abortion. As a result, the large and well respected medical and research INGO for which I work in Bangladesh cannot get USAID funds.

This morning I lost another baby, an adorable 6 month old girl, in my ICU because I didn't have a ventilator to tide her over a severe case of pneumonia. I watched her mother cradle her tiny body and weep her eyes out; I doubt she'd understand that her daughter died because of a "pro-life" policy.

The conservatives' policies may be moralistic and self-righteous, but they are neither moral nor righteous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't upset by hiv
Posted by: herpesgirl on Jan 22, 2009 12:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't upset by HIV or other STDs. Many users on a H dating site" STDpal.com" can face it correctly and many users found their love on that site

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vice controls: because 'morality controls' more important to Powers than health...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Feb 3, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"July 26, 2001: (SACRAMENTO, Calif.) -- In a blow to critics of syringe-exchange programs, a new UC Davis study shows that the controversial programs do reduce injection drug users' HIV risk. The study appears in the July 27 issue of AIDS.

"Our review of the literature should blunt the claims of opponents of syringe exchange, but I'm not optimistic that it will," said lead author David R. Gibson, associate professor of infectious diseases at UC Davis and a senior scientist at UC San Francisco's Center for AIDS Prevention Studies. "Opponents of syringe-exchange programs can be quite data-resistant."

UC Davis researchers scoured the medical literature from 1989 to 1999 for studies examining the impact of exchange programs on HIV risk. The search turned up 42 published studies, most of them conducted in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Twenty-eight of the studies concluded that syringe-exchanges reduce HIV risk among injection drug users.

Of the remaining 14 studies, two found that the programs increase HIV risk, and 12 concluded the programs either have no effect or a mixture of both positive and negative effects.

Gibson and his co-authors found that the 14 negative and equivocal studies all looked at syringe-exchange programs in settings -- primarily in Canada, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands-- where injection drug users can legally purchase low-cost syringes at pharmacies. In contrast, only five of the 28 positive studies were conducted in such communities.

"If you exclude the studies that took place in communities where clean syringes are also available from pharmacies, 28 out of the 29 studies remaining show that syringe exchange is protective against either HIV risk behavior and/or HIV seroconversion," Gibson said.

Syringe-exchange programs in communities where clean needles can be obtained from other sources can be expected to appear less effective than programs that constitute a community's only source of clean syringes, Gibson argues.

Both the Montreal and Vancouver studies were conducted at sites where drug users had legal access to syringes both from pharmacies as well as syringe exchange, making it difficult to assess the impact of syringe exchange in the two cities. ..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old news in Oz.
Posted by: Livemike on Feb 3, 2009 10:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've had needle exchanges here for years (basically since AIDS started here). Sure there were objections from the NIMBYs but it worked. Look at the different AIDS infection rates here and in the US. Sitcom writers could figure this out (Spin City) why can't the voting public?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement