Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

Why Employer-Based Health Insurance Doesn't Cut It

By Molly M. Ginty, Women's eNews. Posted January 14, 2009.


The majority of doctors believe a single-payer system would provide the best care.
womensenewslogo
For more Women's eNews, visit, www.womensenews.org. To subscribe to Women's eNews, the daily news service for all women, go to www.womenenews.org/join.cfm.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In December, President-elect Barack Obama invited Americans to hold more than 4,000 "health care house parties" and discuss medical reform.

Laura Boylan, a New York City neurologist, hosted one such meeting in the living room of her family's apartment on Dec. 15.

"The questions they asked us to distribute to attendees didn't address the single-payer issue, but instead presumed that employer-based and private insurance would continue to take precedence," says Boylan, a local board member of the Chicago-based Physicians for a National Health Program.

Despite a fierce insurance lobby and an incoming administration pointed in another policy direction, Boylan and her 11 guests -- all doctors, nurses or health activists -- agreed they were prepared to back legislation to create a single-payer system, in which a publicly financed entity (a "single payer") reimburses providers for their services instead of having private insurers reimburse for these services, as they do now.

In 2006, California lawmakers approved a single-payer system in their state. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it, claiming "socialized medicine is not the solution to our health care problems."

Despite this kind of philosophical aversion to their favored approach, Boylan and her allies note that the single-payer paradigm is succeeding in Canada and Europe and has majority support among physicians and citizens here.

A 2004 Archives of Internal Medicine survey showed 63 percent of doctors believe a single-payer system would provide the best care for the most people. A 2007 CNN poll showed 64 percent of Americans believe "the government should provide a national health insurance program for all Americans even if this would require higher taxes."

Obama's Stopgap Pledge

During his campaign, Obama pledged to preserve the employer-based private insurance system and create a stopgap federal program to cover the uninsured.

He is also expected to give serious consideration to a proposal by Senate Finance Committee chair Max Baucus, D-Mont., for mandatory insurance with private companies competing alongside a new Medicare-type program.

For advocates such as Boylan, legislative leadership is coming from Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., who in 2003 and 2007 introduced the National Health Insurance Act (HR 676) to create a publicly financed single-payer system.

"With 47 million Americans uninsured and 50 million underinsured, it's past time for change," Conyers recently told Women's eNews through a spokesperson.

Supporters of a single-payer system propose two possible funding methods. One would be a 3.3 percent payroll tax and a reversal of President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. Another would be to rely on payroll taxes of 8.17 percent for employers and 3.78 percent for employees. Advocates say that, despite additional taxes, a single-payer system would save citizens money.

Conyers' bill has been endorsed by only 93 of 535 members of Congress. Fourteen national labor groups and 20 health and civic groups, including the National Organization for Women and the Coalition of Labor Union Women, both in Washington, have lined up behind it. With Obama slated to take office in nine days, Conyers has pledged to hold hearings on his proposal in the House Committee on the Judiciary, which he chairs.

Geri Jenkins, co-president of the Oakland-based California Nurses Association, says the guaranteed health insurance of a single-payer approach is necessary when so many people are losing their jobs. "Unemployment recently surged to 7.2 percent, and for every 1 percent increase in that rate, 1 million more Americans are predicted to lose their health insurance coverage," Jenkins says.

Industry Opposition

The Washington-based America's Health Insurance Plans, an insurance trade group, argues a single-payer system could result in lower payments for health care providers and job loss in the health care industry, which employs 12 percent of U.S. workers. Of those 12 million workers, 80 percent are women, reports the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health care, medicare, single-payer, health insurance, conyers

Molly M. Ginty is a freelance writer based in New York.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Medicare for All ... NOW !
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 14, 2009 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medicare for All for all the right reasons !

Medicare for All would immediately help states and local governments by taking over health care for workers and Medicaid. This would save hundreds of thousands of jobs ...

Medicare for All would help business stay in business. All the other G7 countries subsidize their companies with government paid health care.

Medicare for All would help those that need help the most with health care costs, the under and uninsured, the working poor, women and increasingly, the middle class!

Medicare for All would save millions of jobs! It is far easier to save a job than it is to create a job. We must stop the destruction of jobs that would otherwise be viable but for the cost of health care.

Medicare for All would give us the platform to reform healthcare so that it doesn't bankrupt this country. Currently we spend twice as much as other industrialized countries covering only 85% of our population while health care outcomes deteriorate.

From John Nichols @ The Nation

In fact, one of the most important steps on the road to economic recovery – or, more precisely, toward a new, responsible and sustainable prosperity – involves the fundamental reform this country's broken health care system.

But it must be the right reform: the establishment of a national single-payer style healthcare reform system by expanding the existing Medicare system to cover all Americans. According to a new "Single Payer/Medicare for All: An Economic Stimulus Plan for the Nation" study released today by the National Nurses Organizing Committee/California Nurses Association, such a reform would provide a major stimulus for the U.S. economy by creating 2.6 million new jobs and infusing $317 billion in new business and public revenues into the economy. This reform would, according to the study, add $100 billion in wages to the currently sputtering U.S. economy."

there's much more ...

More on Medicare for All

The National Coalition on Health Care :

Facts on the Cost of Health Insurance and Health Care

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Medicare for All ... NOW ! Posted by: KDelphi5950
LIKE, DUH
Posted by: Mewsician on Jan 14, 2009 2:31 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that there is even one person in this country - let alone millions - that doesn't support the idea of an immediate shift to a single-payer system is ludicrous, and is testimony to the level of ignorance that prevails in the U.S. Every other civilized nation on the globe enjoys this right for its citizenry, and still we are trapped in the vicious grip of the morally bankrupt insurance lobby here in the supposed "greatest nation on Earth" while people of all ages suffer and die needlessly from a lack of access to decent health care. It's just unbelievable. With threats like the ones we pose to ourselves, who needs to worry about Al Qaeda or any other bogeyman??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LIKE, DUH Posted by: KDelphi5950
It's not gonna be easy to overcome a system
Posted by: Landbaron on Jan 19, 2009 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that collects nice premiums for healthy people that rarely need to visit a doctor but keep the coverage out of fear something might come up or happen, and a system that gets to deny coverage when profits could be affected. Insurance companies are the richest companies in the world. Imagine you have a highly profitable businness and there's a movement to take you out, you're gonna go down swinging. We have to keep constant pressure with this movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement