Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Health & Wellness

The Human Impact: What TVA Isn't Saying about the Coal Spill Disaster

By Erin Brockovich and Robin Greenwald, Huffington Post. Posted January 13, 2009.


What does the future hold for the public's health and safety? Overnight, a whole community's lifestyle is gone.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As a result of a 1.1 billion gallon spill of contaminated fly ash, there has been discussion, press reportage and blogging about the environmental disaster in eastern Tennessee. Most of us have seen the pictures -- a 300+ acre area strewn with black and brown muck as far as the eye can see. Houses lifted off their foundations and thrown across the road, yards filled so high with ash that people can't leave their homes without stepping in it, roadways littered with the ash from trucks going to and from the site, and an eerie still where active life once existed. While this story continues to unfold -- as more samples are taken that delineate the true toxicity of this mess, as TVA makes plans to contain and abate the disaster -- there is a story that has not been told. It is a story that must be told. And that story is the lives of innocent bystanders that have been turned upside down by this avoidable disaster.

I learned of this disaster on the news just as we all did. Usually I receive an email from someone in the community where there has been an environmental problem. At first, it was all quiet. About 10 days after the tragedy I got the first email, then another one and another one and another one, and they kept coming. I also started receiving anonymous tips. It occurred to me that maybe more was going on than what I could gather from the news. With an invitation from the community, I decided to make the trip.

Let's be honest. Usually when I am called into an environmental disaster, I anticipate that industry isn't going to step up to the plate and do what's right by the people. Lawsuits almost always ensue; it would be foolish for me to walk into a situation like this without an attorney. Besides, I consult with two law firms in the United States: Girardi & Keese in Los Angeles and Weitz & Luxenberg in New York. I traveled to the area with an attorney, Robin Greenwald from Weitz and Luxenberg, along with some experts. In many instances such as this disaster, government agencies are absent due to lack of funds and can only rely on the information that industry gives them; and industry generally operates under concealment.

When I first arrived on the site, I was pretty quiet. It took a while to absorb what I was looking at. I knew there was a lake but an entire area was gone. I kept wondering "Where did the water go?" I couldn't decide if it looked more like a tornado had gone through, a mudslide, landslide, maybe a volcano erupted or a tidal wave. It is now a "moonscape." The landscape has completely changed. It is almost unidentifiable.

Watching TV never gives you an idea of the extent of damage. It's only when you stand there that you can actually feel the magnitude.

It struck me that I had an unusual taste on my lips and in my mouth. I asked others if they noticed that, and they did. Some experienced scratchy throats, respiratory problems, itchy and burning eyes and tasted what one expert believed to be sulfuric acid. If we were experiencing this much discomfort after a few minutes, what on earth are the people who live here feeling?

The other thing that stood out in my mind was how fortunate it was that this event took place when it did.

What would it have been like had this occurred in the summer during the middle of the day? Hundreds of people boat on this lake. Children swim and play in these waters. I was struck by the number of deaths that might have occurred but didn't.

This corner of Roane County Tennessee is off the beaten path. It is remote, distant from any main street and city noise. It is easy to see the beauty of rolling mountains, lakes, rivers, comfortable family homes. It is serene, a piece of heaven on earth. This was a safe place to raise kids, to teach them to fish and swim, to enjoy family and have barbecues or sit quietly to watch the sunset on warm summer nights. I could see why people live there. Over the past couple of weeks we have had the opportunity to speak with people about life both before December 22. Life in the Kingston/Harriman area was idyllic. It was a place people chose as their home. It was a place that, even if jobs took people away in their youth, they awaited the day they could return and did so as soon as possible. It is a beautiful place, with water bodies everywhere. There are green meadows laced among the waters. These shared memories come to life in the "before" photographs that residents showed us. The pictures show children diving from docks into the lake, people canoeing along the rivers, families tubing in the hot summer sun and children and their dogs walking along the shore. A favorite scene of many residents is the sunset over the water, with the soft nighttime colors glistening on the lake. It went from pristine to profaned overnight.

The "after" picture is nothing but a sludge-filled lake, dead fish and miles and miles of contamination flowing out of control. And what cannot be captured by photographs is the human toll of this disaster. The child who wakes up nightly with nightmares; the woman whose cough is so severe she can hardly speak and has been diagnosed with acute asthma from the ash spill; the tri-athlete who can no longer train in his environs; the families scared to death to go outside for fear they breathe in the toxic ash in the air; people realizing that TVA's recommendation to boil their water before drinking it in the wake of the disaster was a false comfort and bottled water, at their own expense, is the only solution for drinking; and the couple who lives downwind of the disaster who, following walking their dog on a hilltop on a windy night, suffered severe nose bleeds. This is a very frightening time for the people of this community. This community is incredibly brave, but it is also rightfully fearful -- they love their community, their homes, their environment and they don't want to leave, but they also don't want to stay at the risk of their health. They want answers and they can't get them. Many people have the same tale: they call the TVA hotline for answers and help but no one answers or returns their calls. Why does this happen? What did they do to deserve such treatment? I can only imagine the sadness of the families. The whole area looks like a wound on the land. To heal it, it's going to take more than a band-aid and a squirt of Bactine.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: global warming, climate change, coal, tennessee, clean coal, mountaintop removing, mining, spill, tva

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Health and Wellness! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And folks insist nuclear waste can be safely handled?
Posted by: pelican beak on Jan 13, 2009 2:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If fly ash from coal mines can't even be safely stored, and the powers that be are this unresponsive to calamity of failure, there is no reason to believe fairy tale stories that nuclear waste will be safely stored. Nor that those disasters will be taken seriously by the powers that be.

Those who today support nuclear power are the enabling handmaidens for far worse disasters than this, in the future. And they won't give a flying rot when regions and people die from those disasters. Nuclear power supporters only pretend to care about others. Their truest allegiance is purely ideological - to more and more technology, and the well-being of people be damned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DON'T MEAN TO DISTURB BUSH
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 13, 2009 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But where is OSHA when they should be in Tennessee "doing a heck of a job"? Anna

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Innocent people
Posted by: AnnaKay on Jan 13, 2009 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s always innocent people who suffer when big environmental disasters like this one happen. The corporations that are responsible just deny, downplay and hide the truth. Have you heard about the disaster in Ecuador where Chevron dumped over 18 billion gallons of oil and toxic water into the streams? Today the drinking water is contaminated and over 1,000 people have died from cancer and thousands more are sick with skin diseases and respiratory illnesses. This is all just unbelievable.
Check out this blog to find out more http://www.thechevronpit.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Clean Coal" eh? Sorry, not acceptable, Barack!
Posted by: soundman on Jan 13, 2009 7:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would hope this puts the lie to the concept of clean coal - ALL of this effluvia will still come from coal plants even if theyo clean up the air exhaust. Still making poison!

Tell Obama, clean coal is a lie!

So sad for the people living near power plants of all kinds.

Lou

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can stop this from happening
Posted by: mgmyers79 on Jan 13, 2009 8:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no safe way to dominate the planet. We just have to balls up end our civilization before it ends us. Want to know how? Check out Derrick Jensen's Endgame (Vol. 2): Resistance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Living under a dam
Posted by: underledge on Jan 14, 2009 5:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What occurred is certainly unpleasant and hopefully can be prevented from happening again. However I’m beginning to have little sympathy for those who put themselves in harms way. Knowingly choosing to live down stream from dam holding back tons of toxic waste and then somehow being surprised and outraged when something happens is strange. I would bet that most folks in the area either directly or indirectly make their living from the coal industry.

Unfortunately this is a no-win situation. A steadily increasing demand for energy with no realistic alternative available for its production, simply means more of the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Living under a dam Posted by: widdydupree
» More of the same means... Posted by: mgmyers79
Erin kicks ash!
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jan 14, 2009 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lifestyle prejudice against "hillbillies"--who, in many cases, have given up income opportunities as a tradeoff for living in a rural paradise--is a huge factor in the environmental contamination of East Tennessee, and now the Ocoee River and Stevenson, AL--by TVA.
Nobody believes hillbillies. Talk about contamination, land shifts, and other such problems in a mountain accent and we will be laughed at, scorned, vilified. Speak our truths without the proper, faddishly labeled, conspicuous consumer goods and we will be called Wal-mart wearing trailer trash.
Nobody believes the job-market refugees who wake at midnight pouring tears from homesickness for the shade of Walden's Ridge or the coolness of Black Creek and other streams.
TVA and the AEC have destroyed, not just a river, but the safety of all downstream, the effectiveness of local government in prevention of contamination, the hopes of ever ridding the area of corrupt government. They provided electricity, true, but at what a final cost! The poison will spread through the region, chemists will lie, and the populace who have lived on pinto beans, pure air, and a natural beauty which strengthens the soul, will die slowly and painfully of the wastes of Hiroshima and of strip mining.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TVA destroyed hundreds of homes and farms
Posted by: harpy on Jan 14, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when it built these dams. They took farms and land that had been in the same families for generations. They claimed it was partly to reduce flooding, but the floods come anyway. They took land from owners so they could provide recreation for a few. Recently they've been selling some of the property they acquired that sits next to these man-made lakes to developers so they could make their fortunes, instead of offering the land back to the former owners.

Yes, TVA has provided power, but at a huge cost to the people of Tennessee. TVA claims there is no danger to water, residents, or wildlife as a result of this spill. Yeah, right!! Like we can believe that.

This is just one more example of

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Toxic Waste?
Posted by: cherylholmes on Jan 14, 2009 10:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure under all those new Bush regulations relaxing or eliminating EPA regs...this is how the government and everyone else responsible for this disaster see this situation. Who cares, they're just more poor people we got rid of. Just like ridding New Orleans of the poor with all that contaminated land after Katrina.

None of the soil, water or air will ever be safe again in either place in our lifetimes. There are many sludge contaminated areas including 1 big one in NJ that was featured on Nightline tonight. The EPA will say there's no dangers and no health risks, hell they said it after 9/11 too yet the emergency responders are all dying from exposure to the contaminated air. Lots have already died..they can't even get healthcare.

Even if these poor people in Tenn. had homepwners insurance, it doesn't cover sludge ...destruction from sludge...like all those people in New Orleans whose insurance companies found ways to get out of paying claims for homes they lost too.

You can't blame people for being poor and living near the facility. Many are forced to live wherever they can afford too. I'll bet many lived in those places way before that plant was ever built too so they had no choice...We used to expect companies would do the right thing and be concerned for public safety..before Bush anyway...but not anymore. They build these dumps that will kill people in poverty ridden areas, wherever poor people live because it's a great way to get rid of less desirables, racially or economically. This plant would have never been built near rich people...dams are not allowed to burst near rich people, leaky chemical plants, refineries, bio labs etc, are not built anywhere rich people live.

These poor people are screwed bigtime. Who is going to pay all their current and future medical bills for the sickness this contamination is causing them and their cancers? How and where will they move anyplace?

Lawsuits? Not likely, Bush took those rights away too in the last few weeks...just try to sue ..we no longer have that right either in cases like this...and the EPA regs say everything is just fine and not dangerous. They did this with black mold a few years ago too, even having the CDC announce black mold isn't dangerous and doesn't cause illness...so that insurance companies wouldn't have to pay all the homeowners claims for having black mold...black mold is dangerous as hell and causes major illnesses. I'll bet people in NO can already tell you that.

This is damned disgusting and an outrage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Failure to keep from harm
Posted by: Kimberly on Jan 15, 2009 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading about TVA, and constantly seeing a pattern of Corporate Fraud 'Allowed' by Law Enforcement Officials and Congresspersons ( who most, happen to be lawyers ) shows me we have a corrupt Judicial System, and this is where investigation and prosecution should BEGIN, in order for Americans to obtain ( U.S. Constitution 14th Ammendment ) Due Process of law to protect the Public.

Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.

The Federal Office I discovered conducting 'administrative' Federal Hospital Insurance Fraud, ( Office of Inspector General ) against Retired Federal Employee Health Beneficiaries, has been Allowed to use a 'grievance procedure' to deny civil and criminal rights Against Entitled Individuals.
'Alternate Dispute Resolution', is a Corporate vehicle used to avoid a federal investigation and prosecution, for aiding and abetting ( Federal Racketeering ) Anti-dumping and Anti-kickback Violations conducted BY Department of Justice Employees ~ to force ( fraud by fright - illegal billing for covered claims ) Individuals to illegally apply for State Medicaid ( kickback conversions ) for the poor. The Region 5 HCFA [ Chicago ] Office, had a record high 940 new MSP cases filed in 1998. Contributing to this were Partnership Arrangements [ color of law ] with [ Federal HMO T42CFR417.1 misprison of a felony ] Contractors and U.S. Attorneys in MICHIGAN and Ohio.
Sincerely,
All Victims By the Government
HHS T42CFR417.1 Alternate Dispute Resolution T18CFR1518CRIME.
Systematic Denial of Post-Hospital Extended Care T5CFR890.105
Anti-dumping & anti-kickback violation 42CFR438.704

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No person is totally innocent
Posted by: Naty on Jan 15, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another tragedy... but really are the "direct" victims completely innocent? No, the guilty party is all of humanity, including the members who's homes got demolished. Technology can NEVER guarantee 100% safety and the risks involved to have cheap, accesable energy are accepted by society.

There are two aspects to this disaster and all other environmental catastrophe posed by man (climate destablization being a complicated issue so please leave that phenomenon out of consideration). One is the event itself and my opinion on that is stated above (risk as being an inherent feature of cheap energy).

The other aspect is what happens after the risk is made manifest. This is where government, not private enterprise steps in. TVA is not the responsible party, but government. Truly if the government had passed environmetal laws that included a private company's legal responsibility in disaster clean up then TVA would be busting its ass. Not only is the passage of laws important but so is enforcement. This is where, again, the government steps in.

And really, who is the government but us, citizens??? And don't say we're powerless... because power lies in numbers. The truly responsible party is us, the citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement