PERSONAL HEALTH  
comments_image -

How to Treat the Rare Diseases That Big Pharma Leaves Behind

There is little incentive for drug companies to research treatments for rare diseases. But collaboration with nonprofits could make it happen.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

More than a half billion people around the world suffer from as many as 8,000 "orphan" diseases, for which treatments haven't yet been developed. Unfortunately, the majority of those people live in poverty in developing countries. For the limited purchasing power of people around the globe who suffer from a rare or orphan disease, the financial investment in drug research is prohibitively expensive and unprofitable. So, there is little or no financial incentive for pharmaceutical companies to invest in seeking those missing treatments.

Solutions may lie in partnerships among pharmaceutical companies and not-for-profit research organizations. We know this can work, because it's worked before.

In the 1960s, researchers at the Population Council, the international nonprofit research group with which I've been associated since 1956, made a breakthrough in developing the modern IUD. FEIWomen's Health was our partner in the development process. Clearly, the physical products were and are enormously important, but we also learned another valuable lesson: Cooperation between the public and private sectors can produce triumphs that neither entity could do alone.

Based on this fruitful partnership, we intensified our collaborative efforts with the biopharmaceutical industry. Soon thereafter, a groundbreaking collaboration among the scientific, social and philanthropic communities resulted in the development of a contraceptive implant. It is extremely unlikely that the initial product -- and all its successors on the market today -- would have been possible without personal, corporate, competitive and financial interests being set aside by Wyeth and others for the sake of helping people in dire need.

Many people, in fact. These long-acting contraceptives and the product families that followed have been used by over 200 million women globally to manage the size of their families. Reducing unwanted pregnancies and allowing safe birth spacing reduced maternal and infant mortality.

There are many examples of what is possible with public/private collaboration. Doxycycline, which now treats drug-resistant malaria and filariasis, was developed by Pfizer as an antibiotic in 1967. The Carter Center, Merck, Lions Clubs and others have collaborated on getting Mectizan® to the poorest citizens of 11 countries to prevent river blindness. And new drugs for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, the result of a partnership between Galapagos NV and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, improve life expectancy and quality.

In the U.S., the Orphan Drug Act allows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide incentives for companies to invest in research and development of treatments for orphan diseases. For more than 20 years, this government support has helped bring a few drugs to market. But it's not enough. Other wealthy nations need to step up as well. Thirty members of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, a Paris-based consortium of the richer countries, have together contributed only $43 million to drug development over the past five years. Compare this to the $15 billion directed to PEPFAR by the U.S. government alone from 2003-2008 to fight HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, and to the $48 billion committed for 2009-2013. As the United Nations prepares for the forthcoming General Assembly, the agenda should include intensified research on long-neglected diseases, along with the current investments in treatment for the world's most needy.

A mere one in 10,000 compounds identified in the laboratory eventually receives approval from the FDA, and the road to approval is long, costly and uncertain. Bringing to the global marketplace drugs that have the capacity to greatly influence and improve the human condition requires creativity.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]