COMMENTS: 7
We Have a Right to Know Where Our Food Comes From
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.
Suddenly, I wasn't so hungry.
In truth, food labels in the United States are not this transparent -- these details were not provided on the Breyers’ label. But you will see “ice structuring protein†(ISP). Produced with genetically modified yeast, ISP creates the desired creamy effect without the extra calories. While this ingredient is found in some Breyers ice cream, and albeit at less than 1 percent of the final product, the devil is in the details. In this case and many others, the details aren’t even on the label.
It can be an exhaustive marathon to read every label to ensure we are feeding our families healthful, edible substances that won’t cause us future harm. To be sure, the path from farm to fork guarantees food safety and quality we need effective legislation as well as transparency and honesty from food companies.
It’s a given that every family wants to eat the most nutritious and tasty meals for the least cost to achieve that quality. How do we get there?
As victims of uninformed consent, we have much to decipher in how our food is produced through various means: genetically modified organisms, preservatives, pesticides, cloned animals, rBGH or bovine growth hormone, etc. For example, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering changing "irradiated" on food labels to simply “pasteurized.â€
If my leg of lamb is given shock waves of gamma rays, x-rays or electron beams to kill bacteria, I consider that a long way from pasteurization. Recent studies have shown that irradiating food may promote cancer development, cause genetic damage and deplete vitamins. Irradiating food masks the core problem of poor sanitation in slaughterhouses and processing plants, which causes food-borne illness.
Even simple, common-sense solutions, like knowing where my food came from -- China, California, Cuyahoga County or Calico Cow Farm just down the road -- have been hijacked by agribusiness. The origin of one’s food should not be considered a complex question. Yet Congress had to pass a law just to protect the consumer’s right to know what country our food originated from -- and it hasn’t been implemented.
Federal farm policy theoretically requires labeling the origin of meat, peanuts, seafood, and fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables sold in retail stores. Called Country of Origin Labeling (COOL), it was written in the 2002 Farm Bill and was to go into effect in September of 2004.
Deep pockets influenced Washington as industry lobbyists blocked COOL with the exception of seafood. Lobbying expenditures by groups that opposed COOL between 2000 and 2004 include American Farm Bureau Federation spending $11,840,000 and Wal-Mart doling out $2,760,000. The Goliaths of Agribusiness undercut our right to know where our food comes from despite 82 percent consumer support for mandatory COOL.
Along with over 200 organizations, the National Family Farm Coalition sent a letter to Congress urging our elected officials to finally implement COOL as of September 2007 and end the backdoor delays. So while my T-shirt tag informs me it was made in Bangladesh, darn if I can place where the hamburger meat came from that is sizzling on my grill.
Of course, the best way to avoid the entire labeling dilemma is by eating all whole foods straight from a local family farm source. No labeling need be required when you pick up your vegetables from a farmers' market or your pork from Curly Tail Farm the next county over.
But for many busy families, reality sets in. Between two working parents and kids with more activities than they have years, schedules demand convenience. And this convenience plays out in the form of trips to the grocery store, where we should have all the information to make an informed choice.
To keep us sanely and safely fueled in our hectic lives, the very least that we deserve is to know what is in our food and what country the food came from … is that really too much to ask?
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sea4th on Jun 13, 2007 3:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DDT (and others), banned decades ago is still sold and used around the world where US laws and regulations do not apply. Some of what we import comes from these countries.
Mega-corporations are anxious to get global laws and regulations "harmonized" to suit their aims. Of course, harmonization means lowering standards. It's these giants
that wish to keep secret what we are being fed. Get in touch with your reps and pressure them to force truth in labeling while you're still able to resist.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jun 13, 2007 3:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dkm on Jun 14, 2007 7:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for the reasons for getting upset about all the different ingredients that she was upset about, practically every one of them was due to the "Oh, gross!" factor, not with actual harm of any kind. Do you think that you don't eat fish blood proteins each time you eat fish? Do you really think that just because x-rays can cause cancer that eating food that was x-rayed causes cancer? And as for the damage done to the nutrition, do you really think that cooking doesn't do a whole lot more? Your greatgrandparents and you have been eating cloned organisms all your lives. What do you think it did to them and you? You would rather eat mold than a preservative that has proven harmless through years of use? Mold toxins are really nasty. They destroy livers and cause liver cancer. How do you expect any slaughterhouse to produce something that is bacteriologically sterile? You contaminate it yourself by preparing it. Do you really expect to be able to afford food that was produced under operating room conditions?
This article could have been very instructive, but instead, because of the airhead factor, it mixed good information with total dopiness, diluting the benefits that could have been gained.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Food sources
Posted by: mandiwrite
» Do you really expect to be able to afford food that was produced under operating room conditions?
Posted by: Torgo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jarmadi on Jun 14, 2007 8:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Uh.........not necessarily. At least in our part of the country (Texas/Oklahoma), considerable produce at the larger farmer's markets comes from Mexico.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NewEnergyWorks on Jul 11, 2007 7:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next on the menu, cloned meat: All unlabelled and coming at you at a great, new, low price! Meat, like beef, is already artificially cheap with the force feeding of corn and grain, which cows do not naturally eat: they need to be given antibiotics so that they can digest the stuff. They are given slaughterhouse leftovers so that they fatten up more quickly too, which is likely the cause of 'Mad-cow'.
Food can only be made so cheaply. Beyond that, we start getting into questionable practices.
Our solution is to buy our veggies from the local Community Supported Agriculture: (CSA),
and next will be meat.
The meat is more expensive (probably the real cost of meat), but you know what you are getting, and you know it was done naturally, or at least more naturally than from corporate AgriBusiness.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sea4th on Jun 13, 2007 3:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DDT (and others), banned decades ago is still sold and used around the world where US laws and regulations do not apply. Some of what we import comes from these countries.
Mega-corporations are anxious to get global laws and regulations "harmonized" to suit their aims. Of course, harmonization means lowering standards. It's these giants
that wish to keep secret what we are being fed. Get in touch with your reps and pressure them to force truth in labeling while you're still able to resist.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jun 13, 2007 3:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dkm on Jun 14, 2007 7:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for the reasons for getting upset about all the different ingredients that she was upset about, practically every one of them was due to the "Oh, gross!" factor, not with actual harm of any kind. Do you think that you don't eat fish blood proteins each time you eat fish? Do you really think that just because x-rays can cause cancer that eating food that was x-rayed causes cancer? And as for the damage done to the nutrition, do you really think that cooking doesn't do a whole lot more? Your greatgrandparents and you have been eating cloned organisms all your lives. What do you think it did to them and you? You would rather eat mold than a preservative that has proven harmless through years of use? Mold toxins are really nasty. They destroy livers and cause liver cancer. How do you expect any slaughterhouse to produce something that is bacteriologically sterile? You contaminate it yourself by preparing it. Do you really expect to be able to afford food that was produced under operating room conditions?
This article could have been very instructive, but instead, because of the airhead factor, it mixed good information with total dopiness, diluting the benefits that could have been gained.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Food sources
Posted by: mandiwrite
» Do you really expect to be able to afford food that was produced under operating room conditions?
Posted by: Torgo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jarmadi on Jun 14, 2007 8:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Uh.........not necessarily. At least in our part of the country (Texas/Oklahoma), considerable produce at the larger farmer's markets comes from Mexico.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NewEnergyWorks on Jul 11, 2007 7:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next on the menu, cloned meat: All unlabelled and coming at you at a great, new, low price! Meat, like beef, is already artificially cheap with the force feeding of corn and grain, which cows do not naturally eat: they need to be given antibiotics so that they can digest the stuff. They are given slaughterhouse leftovers so that they fatten up more quickly too, which is likely the cause of 'Mad-cow'.
Food can only be made so cheaply. Beyond that, we start getting into questionable practices.
Our solution is to buy our veggies from the local Community Supported Agriculture: (CSA),
and next will be meat.
The meat is more expensive (probably the real cost of meat), but you know what you are getting, and you know it was done naturally, or at least more naturally than from corporate AgriBusiness.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Could Your Cell Phone End Up Killing You?
The Overuse of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed Is Killing Us
One of the Most Common Chemicals Used in Modern Life Is Now Being Seen as a Health Threat




