PERSONAL HEALTH  
comments_image -

Why the Right-Wing's Insane Attacks on Women's Health May be Backfiring

This grisly ad, and the war on Planned Parenthood, is just another example of conservative overreach. And it may just backfire.
 
Rally for Healthcare Reform and to Stop Stupak at San Francisco City Hall
Photo Credit: Image by Steve Rhodes via Flickr
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

The grisly advertisement from the virulently anti-choice American Life League is an odd one: a bunny rabbit is placed in a blender, the blender is turned on--fade to black. What is the advertisement--using that poor bunny's imagined demise as a metaphor for abortion--specifically advocating? Gutting Title X funding, as we've reported here at AlterNet, would decimate family planning programs in the U.S., and most likely increase the abortion rate. So there would actually be more bunnies in blenders, if they're really hell-bent on using that metaphor.

Here's the transcript (courtesy of Maya at Feministing):

Imagine the government giving hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars every year to a company that does this. [Rabbit placed in blender. Sound of blender being turned on.]

It does. Only they’re not bunnies.

Receiving over $300 million of your tax dollars every year, Planned Parenthood does this nearly a thousand times a day.

Tell Congress: It’s time to stop Planned Parenthood’s tax funding. 

There's just one problem with the ad (beyond the obvious fact that there's no clear symbolic correlation between safe, legal abortions and a bunny smoothie): there's currently no funding for PPFA for abortions, thanks to the Hyde Amendment. And again, getting rid of PPFA's funding would probably make abortions more common.

The ad is so bizarre that it has to be said: it makes the American Life League resemble the famous bunny-boiling Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction, except these anti-choicers are turning their psychotic gaze at women's health in general rather than one person specifically.

It's not only anti-choice groups that are overreaching though. The GOP has also been letting its true extremist colors show.

As Amie Newman, who brought attention to the ad, writes at RH Reality Check:

I almost thought the "Bunnies in a blender" ad was a joke when I viewed it. It's actually more of a riddle, though...How can a group which calls itself "pro-life" actually be opposed to any and all measures which help women and infants stay healthy, and prevent death? This actually isn't about abortion at all. It's about contraception and planning ones' family. It's about our mothers' and babies' health and lives. 

It seems that most Americans agree with Newman's bafflement at this anti-Planned Parenthood, anti-Title X vendetta from extreme right-wing groups like ALL and its pals in congress. A new series of polls shows Americans oppose cutting that funding. 

And Politico ran a story this morning describing Planned Parenthood's flurry of activity in the senate, essentially warning lawmakers of electoral repercussions if they vote to defund Title X. The piece describes the unprecedented outpouring of support for PPFA and groups like NARAL, and quotes women's leaders as saying this assault into previously neutral territory is awakening a "sleeping giant" of concerned citizens furious at the GOP's overreach.

“Going after the strongest brand in women’s health in America is one of the stupidest things the Republican Party could have done,” Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards told Politico

PPFA is even using polling--conducted in states that have senate swing votes--to show that the public stands behind PPFA, no matter what the stance on abortion. The message that PPFA is about health care, and that attacks on Planned Parenthood are attacks on women's health is being heard and understood, loud and clear. The American public gets what ALL can't comprehend. Writes Politico:

The survey suggests, though, that Americans don’t automatically identify a fight over the group’s funding with abortions. It found that, for instance, 64 percent of voters oppose efforts to bar funding for the organization’s screenings for breast cancer.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]