COMMENTS: 106
Catholic Bishops Put Sex Obsession Ahead of Mission to the Sick and the Poor
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.
They lead a church that claims to stand on the side of the sick and the poor, the meek who shall inherit the earth. But in the course of a single week, the bishops of the Roman Catholic Church proclaimed themselves willing to see health-care denied to millions of uninsured Americans, and to yank the social-service rug out from under the feet of tens of thousands of urban poor in the nation's capital -- all to serve the bishops' obsession with the sex lives and reproductive organs of others.
The church's week of shame began with the bishops' role in creating the monster that is the Stupak amendment to the health-care reform bill passed last weekend by the House of Representatives, when the bishops refused to bless a compromise made between pro-choice and anti-abortion Democrats in the language of the bill. (Without the bishops' blessing, anti-choice Democrats vowed to vote against the bill, so Speaker Nancy Pelosi was strong-armed into allowing Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., to bring an anti-choice amendment to the floor.) Finishing off the week with a brutal bang, the church threatened to sever its social service contracts with the District of Columbia if the city council of Washington, D.C., passes a measure legalizing same-sex marriage -- a move that would throw services to 68,000 of the poorest and most vulnerable citizens of the nation's capital into chaos.
This week in the life of the church, says Frances Kissling, the long-time Catholic feminist activist and current visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics, demonstrated the church's "willingness to just be a bully." (Full disclosure: I worked for Kissling in 1998, during her 30-year tenure at the helm of Catholics for Choice.)
The Poor Must Suffer for the Sin of Same-Sex Marriage
Edward Orzechowski is the president and chief executive officer of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Washington. At issue for the church, he said in a press statement, is that the committee drafting the measure in the city council had adjusted the language so that the church would be forbidden from discriminating against same-sex couples in either the adoptions it arranges for the city's foster-care system, or in the employment benefits it offers to its own personnel.
Many of the people who work for Catholic Charities, Orzechowski told the Washington Post, hail from the LGBT community, so the church would be forced to violate its tenets if the anti-discrimination provision remained in the marriage-equality measure. Just so you have that straight: gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people are good enough to work for Catholic Charities, as long as it's okay for the church offer them a lower level of benefits than those conferred on heterosexual couples. And what of the thousands of good people who work hard jobs for low pay in the employ of Catholic Charities in Washington? What will become of their jobs if the church severs its contracts with the city?
"It's a dangerous thing when the Catholic Church starts writing and determining the legislation and the laws of the District of Columbia," said city council member Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6), chairman of the Human Services Committee, told the Post, only to receive this rejoinder:
Susan Gibbs, a spokeswoman for the archdiocese, countered that the city is "the one giving the ultimatum."
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billslm on Nov 16, 2009 1:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the meantime there was the Reformation, Luther reacting in disgust at the out and out corruption and still, basically, the Church felt that it was beyond reproach.
The deals that Pope Pius 11th made with Hitler make one ill to contemplate. And even in this era, we have the pedophile priests molesting boys.
If the bishops had any sense at all they'd keep their mouths shut tight and concentrate on doing good works--- such as care for the poor.
I remember when I was a kid. The movie, The Moon Is Blue, a sophisticated comedy, one of the first after the Hollywood Movie Code went away. How the Monsignor in our church howled his disapproval in the pulpit and forbid his congregation, under pain of Mortal Sin, for which one would burn eternally, in Hell, from seeing the film. The same Monsignor, however, stole more than a million dollars in donations he had been quietly stashing in his own bank account. He withdrew every penny when he retired to Ireland.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Relevant to being inhumane..
Posted by: luzmejor
» READ: EUNUCHS FOR THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
Posted by: PrimaDiva
» RE: AD: EUNUCHS FOR THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
Posted by: illit
» Wasn't Luther a fat lecherous monk?
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: The Irrelevancy of the Roman Church
Posted by: Globular
» Jordan shoes$32,Uug boots$50,handbags$35,Jean$30, free shipping
Posted by: ladyjack552
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Nov 16, 2009 3:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I applaud the Washington DC City Council for sticking to their ideals. It is wrong to continue discrimination against GLBT people, period. If the Catholic Church, or any other religious organization won't follow the law, and chooses to no longer accept our tax dollars to serve the community, then fuck 'em.
The reality is they should never have been getting the money to begin with. The government shouldn't be handing out our tax dollars to any religious organization, but even more so to one that feels it shouldn't be forced to follow the laws of the United States.
No good will ever come out of allowing religion and government to mix. The Founders knew this and their admonition on the matter was a warning to the future-it's too bad we aren't listening any more.
Bryan Galt dot US
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A church that feels it shouldn't be forced to follow the laws of the United States.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: The Good News:
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Nov 16, 2009 3:35 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And they wonder why they are losing followers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Bishops never condemmed the use of torture on Islamic alleged terror suspects
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Waterboarding is a time-honored Catholic tradition
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Uhhh...you mean the Witch Hunts...
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Good Catch, Oregoncharles
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
» RE: Wasn't Joan of Arc executed as a witch - by the Catholic Church?
Posted by: oregoncharles
» No, she was executed by the English
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Second thoughts:
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Just Being Fair
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
» RE: Thanks for the correction
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Selective outrage
Posted by: finleyd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Nov 16, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: moloko velocet on Nov 16, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who the Fuck are the Cat-Lick Bishops....
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: let's tax them
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Atheistno1 on Nov 16, 2009 5:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sex IS The Churches Obsession
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: citizenjoe on Nov 16, 2009 5:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Citizenjoe, calling Catholics out for their gross hubris and hypocrisy IS the right thing to do
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Sister Lauren: Of course, the hierarchy is notorious...
Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: Citizenjoe, calling Catholics out for their gross hubris and hypocrisy IS the right thing to do
Posted by: fma7
» I do not support the Church or its hierarchy.
Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: I do not support the Church or its hierarchy.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Stan, an anti-Catholic biggot ?
Posted by: luzmejor
» Read my reply to Sister Lauren
Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: clean up your own damn dirty house
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Stan, an anti-Catholic biggot ?
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» We have to figure it out
Posted by: citizenjoe
» Absolute nonsense
Posted by: brunowe
» Why don't you go back to your fucking monastery you celibate sub-human piece of filth?
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» Hey Slow Down There Cowboy.
Posted by: That_SOB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 16, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next to killing someone with your own bare hands, bashing their head in with a Rock must come in about second in the oldest form of force.
The ROMAN Catholic Church has been bashing heads since their inception. In fact they began when they were merely called Romans.
We may have misinterpreted the meaning behind Christs nickname for Ol Peter. Instead of referring to stability and resolve. He was referring to Peters tendency to use force and intimadation.Reviewing the Vaticans History that is at least how they have defined it. these are not the Christians slaughtered by the Romans, it's the Romans who slaughter the true Christians.
The Evangelicals have the same Schtick, and aspriations for 'Glory'.Only the slighest of variations is that Theirs is a delusion of the future, not the Romans dreams of resurrecting the past.
Here lies within the real division in Christianity (and probabaly many others faiths), Are Religious hierarchies required for communion with God and thus salvation? Christ Thought Not.
So Peters Church is built not on a rock, but a fault line (Lie). Peter Built his Own 'Temple' under a Roman name.Hades/Pluto Stood at the 'Gates' as well. Installed all the same trappings of both the Jewish Heirarchy and 'Pagan' ritualism that was outright rejected by Jesus.Bread and wine as stand ins for Blood and flesh. Yes We Sacrificed Christ the 'lamb of God' so we could reap the "benefits".Through this sacrific humanity was washed of it's sins? Are you fucking kidding, His sacrific was OUR sin! It not something to be revered, but shamed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Peter "The Rock"
Posted by: fma7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peterjkraus on Nov 16, 2009 6:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either way, they'd start having to toe the line.
Who do they think they are... God?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Make the churches renounce their own acts of terrorism
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Make the churches pay taxes, THEN give them a voice
Posted by: charemor
» RE: selling off of the art treasures in the Vatican
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Make the churches pay taxes, THEN give them a voice
Posted by: Ocean tides
» Confiscate all church property, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Jewish Synagogues, Buddhist Temples
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: Confiscate all church property, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Jewish Synagogues, Buddhist Temples
Posted by: That_SOB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 16, 2009 6:33 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The RC Church took 9/11 $$$$
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Frankiex on Nov 16, 2009 6:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I would like to see a report in the media about all the Catholic priests who died of AIDS
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I would like to see a report in the media about all the Catholic priests who died of AIDS
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Nov 16, 2009 7:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Out of the ashes a new Catholicism will be born.
It will be painful but necessary to witness.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Unless the leadership at the Vatican is toppled ...
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Uhh, yes, let me know how that works for you
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: "Bonapartist" with Some Good Ideas
Posted by: drricklippin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Drafus D. Dragon on Nov 16, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Roman Catholic Church has always cared more about their God, money and power, than about the suffering of mankind. Their teachings have created it through fear and guilt. Their brutal and bloody history, you'd think, would be enough. It is about control of the masses. It has always been about politics, not about love. It is God in man's image and it is deadly as is evident wherever we look.
I am an artist and writer. I've written extensively about this travesty we call religion on my website: www.saintlysinnersloft.com under the "Manifesto" link.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: God Of nothing
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: God Of The World
Posted by: Richardsievert
» RE: God Of The World/turd soup/change yur meds
Posted by: fma7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 16, 2009 7:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the hypocrisy is astounding on many levels; this is the same church that allowed their sadistic priests to molest children and then covered it up for years, this is the same church that is supposed to be "the final" authority for "morality" and they effectively would blackmail the District's sick and poor because they recognize LBGT people?!?!? WTH! Is that really what they think Jesus would do?
No! The Catholic Church in reality they hate women, period! It's ok with them if women are dirt poor having babies that they can't take care of, but they have a problem with LBGT folk, puhlease!! I think the real problem is that these "men" have never known the love of a woman or a man and are sooo confused and full of "backlog" that they have started hating themselves! How about they allow themselves to get married, at least a spouse would relieve their lonely nights!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hypocrisy......
Posted by: fma7
» RE: Hypocrisy......
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: plantland on Nov 16, 2009 7:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this instance, Catholic Charities resents being dictated to in ways it can't accept- or afford.
What they can spend on services for those they help, like recent immigrants or paying more workers goes down if they have to pay for a package for that worker's family, or to create a family for the worker using expensive IVF procedures and surrogates, etc.
I don't think the Catholic Church should dictate to Congess about abortion, but I am not sure that the Church should have to let the DC Council force them to act against their beliefs either.
I am surprised that they don't seem to discriminate in hiring overall- good for them.
But reader comments made me realize that they are also receiving grants from government, as opposed to simply using the bequests of parishioners for theri social aims. I wish I knew the ratio of what comes from their congregants vs what they compete for in grant money.
Single payer would also help products made in the US compete better with imports, which don't have to add the costs of health insurance as directly to their products.
Making even more employers pay to insure their workers and their families, or pay penalities as both the House and Senate bill would do, is out of synch with the need to create new jobs for our distressed unemployed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes! If a person is unemployed, he/she & family need healthcare just as much, if not more, than
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
» RE: Getting health insurance through employers is a screwy system
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Nov 16, 2009 8:17 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Nov 16, 2009 9:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happened of the mission to care for the sick & poor? Why does the Vatican hoard the wealth that could feed the planet???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No, they were always like this:
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Death to the Church!
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: I didn't say that.
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 16, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(Quoted from a comment on a previous string - just in case that person doesn't get to it.)
And what makes the Bishops think we've forgotten?
And yes, it's absolutely relevant: it reveals how ruthless and amoral they really are.
The scum also rises.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» These hypocrite Catholic leaders,
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 16, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» He'd do nothing, because he's dead and nonexistent, if he ever existed in the first place.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: He'd do Allot, because he's not dead and Existent, if he ever tried in the first place.You w.b.d
Posted by: Richardsievert
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 16, 2009 9:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The less power they have over people's lives, the better.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tedri50 on Nov 16, 2009 10:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bonapartist on Nov 16, 2009 10:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is when the idea usually breaks down and the whole train of anti Catholicism etc comes out. Scroll the responses even in this forum if you will, very few will denounce all organized religions and fewer still will demand separation of church and state combined with a freedom of worship.
There is an old saying that anti Catholicism is antisemitism for the liberals and thus acceptable. Catholic church, as any other religious group, should have no say in the government whatsoever. Period.
However the moment you start with the reasoning of religion A is worse than religion B and thus religion A should be banned, you are forcing people to take sides.
In a nutshell all religions and creeds should be separated from the state, no exceptions and no special cases. So long as the aim is set at one group (Catholics, Evangelicals, Muslims) the game is lost before it even started.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: AntiCatholic vs. AntiClerical
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: AntiCatholic vs. AntiClerical
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: American Catholics, being Americans,
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Tyrant wolves in freedom sheep's clothing.
Posted by: SpiritMatter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thornwolf on Nov 16, 2009 11:12 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tangodaddy on Nov 16, 2009 11:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: spbreathnach on Nov 16, 2009 11:17 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ireland, Poland, the Phillipines are all Papal States,and in each of them the entire secular project of production is adumbrated. Not only do these countries try to survive on the most medieval notions, but they surrender their entire intellectual motor force to a pathetics cabal of ignorant celibates, most die-hard Jesuits who exhibit a spurious sense of secular knowledge and learning. These celibates subvert the machinery of government and , as has been evidenced so often in hisory, are prepared to die rather than share Papal power.
Mexico, Spain, Austria, Italy and Germany are linked together in the production of WW1 and WW2. American only comes into its own with these wars and the infiltration of American politics by Catholic 'universities'. Since WW11, India, America and South America have been closely brought into alignment by a concerted universal church, which really does not mind war, if only they can direct the where, the when and the why of it. Its secret missions, hidden invariably behind 'charitable projects', is becoming farcical.
Secular authorities , in my opinion, have no real idea of the dedication of these celibates to acquiring world domination. Government after government gives way, at first to charitable projects, then legislative and educaitonal programmes. Thereafter, piecemeal party-systems are afraid of the homogeneous strength and international terror of the Roman Church.
The current rumble concerning the emphasis on fertility and sexual control by the RCC in preference to helping the poor and the infirm is only one rumble among thousands of other such conflicts that reveal the real nature of the Roman church around the world -- all of which conflicts are led and instigated by the smallest of states, the Vatican, controlled by one man, a Pharaoh and Vicar to the memory of Titus Caesar, a little Italian tyrant.
Can secular America -- even to the memory of Vietnam and such places -- do nothing to stem the tide of this universally unhealthy subversive...???
Seamus Breathnach
www.irish-criminology.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgoalierob on Nov 16, 2009 11:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American Catholic Church is pointless.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: barefeet on Nov 16, 2009 12:09 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ais1956 on Nov 16, 2009 12:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that American Bishops are not satisfied with allowing their priests to bugger boys and get away with it. Now they want to do the same thing to the entire country.
I am an American citizen now. The greatest thing about this country's foundation is the separation of Church and State.
NO AMERICAN should tolerate political interfearance by clergy - of any religion.
The founding fathers setup a wall of separation between church and state because they wanted to protect the church. History shows that whenever clergy have political power, it corrupts the church. This has happened to all religions not just Christianity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EddDoerr on Nov 16, 2009 2:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: illit on Nov 16, 2009 2:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way for religions to freely vent their spleen is to be NON tax supported.
Send a nice fat tax bill to the Catholic/Baptist/christian/Mormon/Jewish/Islamic/ad nauseam places of worship and the rest of us can get on with our lives with decent health care and who cares who marries who(M?)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: desidid on Nov 16, 2009 2:41 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frank69 on Nov 16, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwbeeno on Nov 16, 2009 4:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hess
Online Privacy when it Counts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 16, 2009 5:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People will die if they aren't fed. I can't imagine anyone holding this program for ransom.
I have a sense that "Christianity" isn't primarily about wielding raw, naked political power in a high stakes poker game. Blessed are those with ice in their veins? Which Jesus of Nazareth is that?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JefffromCA on Nov 16, 2009 6:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Nov 16, 2009 8:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jacklang0001 on Nov 17, 2009 5:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have some cheap things ...
nike shoes, fashion clothes ;brand handbags ,wallet ...
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Nov 17, 2009 8:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just take one particular time in history.
J. M. Robertson has estimated that from the first crusade launched by Pope Urban II in 1095 to the fall of Acre in 1291, nine million lives were lost.
This may be an overestimation, but the number is certainly in the millions and represents only the beginning of the carnage which places the Catholic Church in the same league with the Third Reich and the purges of Stalin or Mao.
Before the crusades against the 'heathens' were concluded, the popes began an internal crusade against heretics within Christendom. The resulting Inquisition lasted officially almost 600 years and resulted in the loss of additional millions of lives.
As a recovering Catholic, there is little doubt in my mind that if given the chance, the present Nazi pope would repeat this event.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Catholic church is only the vehicle
Posted by: SpiritMatter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 18, 2009 9:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So its no surprise they are putting sex ahead of the needs of the poor.
They need to stop making judgments on society and teach us and themselves to simply ask, "What would Christ do?"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unionyes on Nov 21, 2009 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Serenalin on Dec 4, 2009 11:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
football jersey
NFL
this is forever!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billslm on Nov 16, 2009 1:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the meantime there was the Reformation, Luther reacting in disgust at the out and out corruption and still, basically, the Church felt that it was beyond reproach.
The deals that Pope Pius 11th made with Hitler make one ill to contemplate. And even in this era, we have the pedophile priests molesting boys.
If the bishops had any sense at all they'd keep their mouths shut tight and concentrate on doing good works--- such as care for the poor.
I remember when I was a kid. The movie, The Moon Is Blue, a sophisticated comedy, one of the first after the Hollywood Movie Code went away. How the Monsignor in our church howled his disapproval in the pulpit and forbid his congregation, under pain of Mortal Sin, for which one would burn eternally, in Hell, from seeing the film. The same Monsignor, however, stole more than a million dollars in donations he had been quietly stashing in his own bank account. He withdrew every penny when he retired to Ireland.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Relevant to being inhumane..
Posted by: luzmejor
» READ: EUNUCHS FOR THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
Posted by: PrimaDiva
» RE: AD: EUNUCHS FOR THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
Posted by: illit
» Wasn't Luther a fat lecherous monk?
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: The Irrelevancy of the Roman Church
Posted by: Globular
» Jordan shoes$32,Uug boots$50,handbags$35,Jean$30, free shipping
Posted by: ladyjack552
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Nov 16, 2009 3:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I applaud the Washington DC City Council for sticking to their ideals. It is wrong to continue discrimination against GLBT people, period. If the Catholic Church, or any other religious organization won't follow the law, and chooses to no longer accept our tax dollars to serve the community, then fuck 'em.
The reality is they should never have been getting the money to begin with. The government shouldn't be handing out our tax dollars to any religious organization, but even more so to one that feels it shouldn't be forced to follow the laws of the United States.
No good will ever come out of allowing religion and government to mix. The Founders knew this and their admonition on the matter was a warning to the future-it's too bad we aren't listening any more.
Bryan Galt dot US
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A church that feels it shouldn't be forced to follow the laws of the United States.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: The Good News:
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Nov 16, 2009 3:35 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And they wonder why they are losing followers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Bishops never condemmed the use of torture on Islamic alleged terror suspects
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Waterboarding is a time-honored Catholic tradition
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Uhhh...you mean the Witch Hunts...
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Good Catch, Oregoncharles
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
» RE: Wasn't Joan of Arc executed as a witch - by the Catholic Church?
Posted by: oregoncharles
» No, she was executed by the English
Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Second thoughts:
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Just Being Fair
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
» RE: Thanks for the correction
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Selective outrage
Posted by: finleyd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Nov 16, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: moloko velocet on Nov 16, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who the Fuck are the Cat-Lick Bishops....
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: let's tax them
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Atheistno1 on Nov 16, 2009 5:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sex IS The Churches Obsession
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: citizenjoe on Nov 16, 2009 5:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Citizenjoe, calling Catholics out for their gross hubris and hypocrisy IS the right thing to do
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Sister Lauren: Of course, the hierarchy is notorious...
Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: Citizenjoe, calling Catholics out for their gross hubris and hypocrisy IS the right thing to do
Posted by: fma7
» I do not support the Church or its hierarchy.
Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: I do not support the Church or its hierarchy.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Stan, an anti-Catholic biggot ?
Posted by: luzmejor
» Read my reply to Sister Lauren
Posted by: citizenjoe
» RE: clean up your own damn dirty house
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Stan, an anti-Catholic biggot ?
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» We have to figure it out
Posted by: citizenjoe
» Absolute nonsense
Posted by: brunowe
» Why don't you go back to your fucking monastery you celibate sub-human piece of filth?
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» Hey Slow Down There Cowboy.
Posted by: That_SOB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Nov 16, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next to killing someone with your own bare hands, bashing their head in with a Rock must come in about second in the oldest form of force.
The ROMAN Catholic Church has been bashing heads since their inception. In fact they began when they were merely called Romans.
We may have misinterpreted the meaning behind Christs nickname for Ol Peter. Instead of referring to stability and resolve. He was referring to Peters tendency to use force and intimadation.Reviewing the Vaticans History that is at least how they have defined it. these are not the Christians slaughtered by the Romans, it's the Romans who slaughter the true Christians.
The Evangelicals have the same Schtick, and aspriations for 'Glory'.Only the slighest of variations is that Theirs is a delusion of the future, not the Romans dreams of resurrecting the past.
Here lies within the real division in Christianity (and probabaly many others faiths), Are Religious hierarchies required for communion with God and thus salvation? Christ Thought Not.
So Peters Church is built not on a rock, but a fault line (Lie). Peter Built his Own 'Temple' under a Roman name.Hades/Pluto Stood at the 'Gates' as well. Installed all the same trappings of both the Jewish Heirarchy and 'Pagan' ritualism that was outright rejected by Jesus.Bread and wine as stand ins for Blood and flesh. Yes We Sacrificed Christ the 'lamb of God' so we could reap the "benefits".Through this sacrific humanity was washed of it's sins? Are you fucking kidding, His sacrific was OUR sin! It not something to be revered, but shamed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Peter "The Rock"
Posted by: fma7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peterjkraus on Nov 16, 2009 6:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either way, they'd start having to toe the line.
Who do they think they are... God?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Make the churches renounce their own acts of terrorism
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Make the churches pay taxes, THEN give them a voice
Posted by: charemor
» RE: selling off of the art treasures in the Vatican
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Make the churches pay taxes, THEN give them a voice
Posted by: Ocean tides
» Confiscate all church property, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Jewish Synagogues, Buddhist Temples
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: Confiscate all church property, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Jewish Synagogues, Buddhist Temples
Posted by: That_SOB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Nov 16, 2009 6:33 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The RC Church took 9/11 $$$$
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Frankiex on Nov 16, 2009 6:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I would like to see a report in the media about all the Catholic priests who died of AIDS
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I would like to see a report in the media about all the Catholic priests who died of AIDS
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Nov 16, 2009 7:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Out of the ashes a new Catholicism will be born.
It will be painful but necessary to witness.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Unless the leadership at the Vatican is toppled ...
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Uhh, yes, let me know how that works for you
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: "Bonapartist" with Some Good Ideas
Posted by: drricklippin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Drafus D. Dragon on Nov 16, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Roman Catholic Church has always cared more about their God, money and power, than about the suffering of mankind. Their teachings have created it through fear and guilt. Their brutal and bloody history, you'd think, would be enough. It is about control of the masses. It has always been about politics, not about love. It is God in man's image and it is deadly as is evident wherever we look.
I am an artist and writer. I've written extensively about this travesty we call religion on my website: www.saintlysinnersloft.com under the "Manifesto" link.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: God Of nothing
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: God Of The World
Posted by: Richardsievert
» RE: God Of The World/turd soup/change yur meds
Posted by: fma7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 16, 2009 7:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the hypocrisy is astounding on many levels; this is the same church that allowed their sadistic priests to molest children and then covered it up for years, this is the same church that is supposed to be "the final" authority for "morality" and they effectively would blackmail the District's sick and poor because they recognize LBGT people?!?!? WTH! Is that really what they think Jesus would do?
No! The Catholic Church in reality they hate women, period! It's ok with them if women are dirt poor having babies that they can't take care of, but they have a problem with LBGT folk, puhlease!! I think the real problem is that these "men" have never known the love of a woman or a man and are sooo confused and full of "backlog" that they have started hating themselves! How about they allow themselves to get married, at least a spouse would relieve their lonely nights!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hypocrisy......
Posted by: fma7
» RE: Hypocrisy......
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: plantland on Nov 16, 2009 7:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this instance, Catholic Charities resents being dictated to in ways it can't accept- or afford.
What they can spend on services for those they help, like recent immigrants or paying more workers goes down if they have to pay for a package for that worker's family, or to create a family for the worker using expensive IVF procedures and surrogates, etc.
I don't think the Catholic Church should dictate to Congess about abortion, but I am not sure that the Church should have to let the DC Council force them to act against their beliefs either.
I am surprised that they don't seem to discriminate in hiring overall- good for them.
But reader comments made me realize that they are also receiving grants from government, as opposed to simply using the bequests of parishioners for theri social aims. I wish I knew the ratio of what comes from their congregants vs what they compete for in grant money.
Single payer would also help products made in the US compete better with imports, which don't have to add the costs of health insurance as directly to their products.
Making even more employers pay to insure their workers and their families, or pay penalities as both the House and Senate bill would do, is out of synch with the need to create new jobs for our distressed unemployed.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes! If a person is unemployed, he/she & family need healthcare just as much, if not more, than
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
» RE: Getting health insurance through employers is a screwy system
Posted by: Basenjis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Nov 16, 2009 8:17 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Nov 16, 2009 9:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happened of the mission to care for the sick & poor? Why does the Vatican hoard the wealth that could feed the planet???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No, they were always like this:
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Death to the Church!
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: I didn't say that.
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 16, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(Quoted from a comment on a previous string - just in case that person doesn't get to it.)
And what makes the Bishops think we've forgotten?
And yes, it's absolutely relevant: it reveals how ruthless and amoral they really are.
The scum also rises.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» These hypocrite Catholic leaders,
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 16, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» He'd do nothing, because he's dead and nonexistent, if he ever existed in the first place.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: He'd do Allot, because he's not dead and Existent, if he ever tried in the first place.You w.b.d
Posted by: Richardsievert
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 16, 2009 9:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The less power they have over people's lives, the better.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tedri50 on Nov 16, 2009 10:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bonapartist on Nov 16, 2009 10:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is when the idea usually breaks down and the whole train of anti Catholicism etc comes out. Scroll the responses even in this forum if you will, very few will denounce all organized religions and fewer still will demand separation of church and state combined with a freedom of worship.
There is an old saying that anti Catholicism is antisemitism for the liberals and thus acceptable. Catholic church, as any other religious group, should have no say in the government whatsoever. Period.
However the moment you start with the reasoning of religion A is worse than religion B and thus religion A should be banned, you are forcing people to take sides.
In a nutshell all religions and creeds should be separated from the state, no exceptions and no special cases. So long as the aim is set at one group (Catholics, Evangelicals, Muslims) the game is lost before it even started.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: AntiCatholic vs. AntiClerical
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: AntiCatholic vs. AntiClerical
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: American Catholics, being Americans,
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Tyrant wolves in freedom sheep's clothing.
Posted by: SpiritMatter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thornwolf on Nov 16, 2009 11:12 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tangodaddy on Nov 16, 2009 11:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: spbreathnach on Nov 16, 2009 11:17 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ireland, Poland, the Phillipines are all Papal States,and in each of them the entire secular project of production is adumbrated. Not only do these countries try to survive on the most medieval notions, but they surrender their entire intellectual motor force to a pathetics cabal of ignorant celibates, most die-hard Jesuits who exhibit a spurious sense of secular knowledge and learning. These celibates subvert the machinery of government and , as has been evidenced so often in hisory, are prepared to die rather than share Papal power.
Mexico, Spain, Austria, Italy and Germany are linked together in the production of WW1 and WW2. American only comes into its own with these wars and the infiltration of American politics by Catholic 'universities'. Since WW11, India, America and South America have been closely brought into alignment by a concerted universal church, which really does not mind war, if only they can direct the where, the when and the why of it. Its secret missions, hidden invariably behind 'charitable projects', is becoming farcical.
Secular authorities , in my opinion, have no real idea of the dedication of these celibates to acquiring world domination. Government after government gives way, at first to charitable projects, then legislative and educaitonal programmes. Thereafter, piecemeal party-systems are afraid of the homogeneous strength and international terror of the Roman Church.
The current rumble concerning the emphasis on fertility and sexual control by the RCC in preference to helping the poor and the infirm is only one rumble among thousands of other such conflicts that reveal the real nature of the Roman church around the world -- all of which conflicts are led and instigated by the smallest of states, the Vatican, controlled by one man, a Pharaoh and Vicar to the memory of Titus Caesar, a little Italian tyrant.
Can secular America -- even to the memory of Vietnam and such places -- do nothing to stem the tide of this universally unhealthy subversive...???
Seamus Breathnach
www.irish-criminology.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rgoalierob on Nov 16, 2009 11:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American Catholic Church is pointless.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: barefeet on Nov 16, 2009 12:09 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ais1956 on Nov 16, 2009 12:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that American Bishops are not satisfied with allowing their priests to bugger boys and get away with it. Now they want to do the same thing to the entire country.
I am an American citizen now. The greatest thing about this country's foundation is the separation of Church and State.
NO AMERICAN should tolerate political interfearance by clergy - of any religion.
The founding fathers setup a wall of separation between church and state because they wanted to protect the church. History shows that whenever clergy have political power, it corrupts the church. This has happened to all religions not just Christianity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EddDoerr on Nov 16, 2009 2:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: illit on Nov 16, 2009 2:24 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way for religions to freely vent their spleen is to be NON tax supported.
Send a nice fat tax bill to the Catholic/Baptist/christian/Mormon/Jewish/Islamic/ad nauseam places of worship and the rest of us can get on with our lives with decent health care and who cares who marries who(M?)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: desidid on Nov 16, 2009 2:41 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frank69 on Nov 16, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwbeeno on Nov 16, 2009 4:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hess
Online Privacy when it Counts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 16, 2009 5:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People will die if they aren't fed. I can't imagine anyone holding this program for ransom.
I have a sense that "Christianity" isn't primarily about wielding raw, naked political power in a high stakes poker game. Blessed are those with ice in their veins? Which Jesus of Nazareth is that?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JefffromCA on Nov 16, 2009 6:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Nov 16, 2009 8:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jacklang0001 on Nov 17, 2009 5:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have some cheap things ...
nike shoes, fashion clothes ;brand handbags ,wallet ...
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Nov 17, 2009 8:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just take one particular time in history.
J. M. Robertson has estimated that from the first crusade launched by Pope Urban II in 1095 to the fall of Acre in 1291, nine million lives were lost.
This may be an overestimation, but the number is certainly in the millions and represents only the beginning of the carnage which places the Catholic Church in the same league with the Third Reich and the purges of Stalin or Mao.
Before the crusades against the 'heathens' were concluded, the popes began an internal crusade against heretics within Christendom. The resulting Inquisition lasted officially almost 600 years and resulted in the loss of additional millions of lives.
As a recovering Catholic, there is little doubt in my mind that if given the chance, the present Nazi pope would repeat this event.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Catholic church is only the vehicle
Posted by: SpiritMatter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 18, 2009 9:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So its no surprise they are putting sex ahead of the needs of the poor.
They need to stop making judgments on society and teach us and themselves to simply ask, "What would Christ do?"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unionyes on Nov 21, 2009 6:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Serenalin on Dec 4, 2009 11:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
football jersey
NFL
this is forever!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Could Your Cell Phone End Up Killing You?
The Overuse of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed Is Killing Us
One of the Most Common Chemicals Used in Modern Life Is Now Being Seen as a Health Threat




