PERSONAL HEALTH  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 75

We Expect Immortality From Medicine -- and It's Destroying Our Health

Our quest for eternal youth enables the country's dependence on a broken medical industrial complex.
September 24, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

President Barack Obama during his first months in office seldom has missed a chance to liken the country's health care system to an unburied corpse, which, if left lying around in the sun by the 111th Congress, threatens to foul the sweet summer air of the American dream. The prognosis doesn't admit of a second or third opinion. Whether on call to the Democratic left or the Republican right, the attending politicians and consulting economists concur in their assessment of the risk posed by the morbid emissions. The country now pays an annual fee of $2.4 trillion for its medical treatments (16% of the GDP); the costs continue to lead nowhere but up. Fail to embalm or entomb the putrefying debt, and it's only a matter of time -- ten years, maybe twenty -- before the pulse disappears from the monitors tracking the heartbeat on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

So say the clinicians in Washington, and I don't quarrel with the consensus. If I can't make sense of some of the diagnoses or most of the prescriptions, at least I can understand that what is being discussed is the health of the American economy, not the well being of its people. The symptoms present as vividly as do the manifestations of bubonic plague, showing up as an infection of the body politic caused by the referral of the country's medical care to the empathy of accountants and the wisdom of drug dealers. Thus the suppurating cruelty and the malignant disparities, among which a few of the most apparent attest to the severity of the disorder:

The United States leads the world in the advancements of medical science, its hospitals splendidly equipped with Magnetic Resonance Imaging machines and artificial hearts, its doctors gloriously decorated with Nobel prizes, but between 44,000 and 98,000 patients die every year in American hospitals of iatrogenic infections or as the consequence of a mistaken diagnosis or a bungled operation. American hospitals and doctors are paid for the amount of care they produce, not for its effectiveness or its quality. Medical error ranks as the country's eighth leading cause of death, more deadly than breast cancer or highway accidents.

Americans in 2007 paid $7,421 per capita for health care as opposed to $2,840 paid by the Finns and $3,328 by the Swedes, but life expectancy in the United States is not as long as it is in 30 other countries, among them Finland and Sweden; the first year infant mortality rate in the United States is higher than it is in some forty other countries, among them Slovenia and Singapore. A newborn child stands a better chance of survival in Minsk and Havana than it does in New York or Washington.

The money allocated to health care in most other developed countries (in Canada and France as well as in Germany and Japan) provides medical insurance for the entire citizenry. Not in America; 46 million citizens (15% of the population) are uninsured. Patients with sufficient funds can buy a brain implant or a bionic eye, but an estimated 22,000 people died in 2006 for lack of insurance; 59 million other people reported their inability to receive needed medical attention. Together with the cornucopia of drugs for all seasons the American healthcare shopping mall now offers expensive diagnostic tests that allow upwards of 6 million Americans to enjoy the benefit of high-priced bodily home improvements -- Titanium knees, Peruvian kidneys, two hour erections and a sunny disposition. Of the 1.5 million Americans expected to declare personal bankruptcy this year, 60% will be forced to do so to pay their medical bills. The ratio between the country's shelters for battered women and its shelters for stray animals stands at 3 to 1 in favor of the animals.

The anecdotal testimony is in agreement with the statistical evidence. The news media bring recurrent reports of patients denied treatment because they are too old or too sick to deserve an insurance company's blessing. Friends, family and chance acquaintances tell of near-death experiences in a hospital emergency room or admitting office. The data suggest that any recuperating of the country's health care system requires the solution of a philosophical problem before treating the political and economic trauma.

The heavy cost of the enterprise follows from our asking of medicine more than medicine can deliver -- not only the cure for death, but also the gift of riches. The foolishness of the request was more readily apparent in societies unexposed to the chemistry of birth control pills and the mechanics of a triple coronary bypass. During the first half of the twentieth century even an extended stay in an American hospital didn't hold out a higher chance of recovery, and for most illnesses the treatments were therapeutic, not diagnostic. Doctors relied on common sense, on the natural resilience of the human body and the hope that by tomorrow morning the patient would show signs of improvement. A medical practice was likely to consist of five or six doctors who answered weekend and late-night telephone calls, knew the names and ailments of their patients, tended to think of their profession as a public service, understood that the strength to confront suffering was to be found in the acts of kindness tempered with wisdom and courage.


submit to reddit
Lewis Lapham is the Editor of Lapham's Quarterly , a new magazine of history and ideas (www.laphamsquarterly.org). He also serves as editor emeritus and national correspondent for Harper's magazine.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: health, obama, medicine, health reform, immortality
 
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Lewis' Article 'Bout Sums It Up For Me ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 24, 2009 1:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His philosophical decadence, punctuated with mathematical precision, is a complete autopsy of the body politique, medicine economique and the psychology Americain ...

~~~~

Best current summary of the Health Care Debacle I've seen: From ... The Black Agenda Report ...

Why the Public Option is Doomed To Fail, and What Can Be Done About It.

"To begin with, there are no less than three versions of the public option. The first is an imaginary public option first conceived by Political Science grad student Jacob Hatcher in 2001. It was to postpone the death of private insurance companies by forcing them to compete with a publicly funded insurer open to all comers which would drive their prices downward. This imaginary public option has never been written into law, and is not under consideration in Congress this year. It lives pretty much in the minds of the public and the lips of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, MoveOn.Org and many others. It's in the mouth of Howard Dean, who says it will be just like Medicare, only available to everybody. To distinguish it from the President Obama's version, it is usually called "the robust public option."

There's much more ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

huge costs
Posted by: Oemissions on Sep 24, 2009 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The social costs of driving are staggering. The average American spends about $9000 just on maintenance for one automobile each year. The overuse of so many automobiles increases health problems enormously.If half of the population quit driving for one year and that money was pooled, it would be 4.5 Trillion$$$. Go figure.
I also wonder how much hospital and doctor time is spent on vanity procedures?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: huge costs Posted by: Birdland

Comments are closed-

Vanity is a killer
Posted by: weathered on Sep 24, 2009 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for many its all about the outside, but its the inside that matters most.

Its not about the number of years one lives, but the quality of those years. Ultimately the chasing of longevity is a very selfish act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vanity is a killer Posted by: JenniferBedingfield

Comments are closed-

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT ISSUE-KEY TO OUR CULTURAL MATURITY
Posted by: drricklippin on Sep 24, 2009 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lapham has identified THE key issue around which we as individuals and as a nation can mature.

I phrase it this way- "Every American citizen DESERVES as dignified and as pain free a death that bio-medicine can possible provide to them"

To believe that bio-medical technology can "beat death" calls for a large dose of medical humility- not millions in unnecessary reasearch expenditures($) and the immoral clinical practice of prolonging sufferring and death.

GROW UP AMERICA

(For more on this topic write to me at ralippin@aol.com)

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CynicI Has His Act Together! Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: CynicI Has His Act Together! Posted by: photon's feather
» Excellent insight... Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

Corpoarte Welfare
Posted by: snowhound on Sep 24, 2009 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the government is going to continue to subsidize health care and funnel tax dollars into the medical cartel, I believe we would be better off if the government took over health care all together and removed all corporate profit and control all together. Enough of this corporate welfare! Either live with true free market capitalism (no government subsidies) or live with a non profit government runned health care system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Must read
Posted by: Quasar on Sep 24, 2009 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, how do you respond to Lapham? He says what needs to be said better than anyone can say it. I am going to reread it now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Welfare for the Corporation needs to STOP..........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 24, 2009 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Lapham is dead on in this article! Either we as a nation recognize that all of us are human beings with a right to real health-care and cut off the Corporate Oligarchy from the public Welfare dole, or we continue to subsidize the sharks to our own detriment!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Scary
Posted by: WoodoMomo on Sep 24, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thats downright scary when you think about it!

RT
Online Anonymity when it Counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Excellent article which nails the for-profit addiction on all levels.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Sep 24, 2009 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only objection I had to this article was not talking about alternative practitioners and homeopathy which are not for-profit. Currently, Big Insurance which most employers are tied to will offer little to no coverage for alternative practitioners and homeopathy. Part of the reason is the FDA and the DEA. However, another part of the blame lies in the way Big Insurance/Pharma and the AMA steadfastly refuse to give up their for-profit addiction. In addition to single payer health care, access to and coverage for alternative practitioners and homeopathy is critical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

A good discussion
Posted by: SteveA on Sep 24, 2009 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always enjoyed Lapham's work, and he has given us a pretty positive chance to discuss things without the fireworks so often seen on the 'Net. I suspect we will always see wasteful things and outrageous payment to some CEOs in the business world - who are making these decisions, humans or something? Let's just not overreact and throw a very valuable baby - the American healthcare system - out with the bathwater.

Didn't I use to hear Lapham's voice on the radio somewhere?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Lapham is wrong
Posted by: photon's feather on Sep 24, 2009 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We do suffer a lack competent and caring doctors.

If we do not, how would he explain the number of times that med techs, orderlies, and laymen have successfully diagnosed illnesses that had stymied doctors (including specialists)?

Most doctors I have known entered the profession because they were already arrogant (clever, doted-on schoolboys/-girls), and sought the prestige and wealth that come with the title - and not because they sought to ease suffering or help their fellow man. (The disdain they hold for their fellow man oozes out of them in obvious contemptuous and patronizing tones in their offices.) In short, they sought to be 'Doctor,' not healer.

I have tracked this trend as it has continued unabated throughout my lifetime. Indeed, I would venture to say it is rapidly accelerating.

Malpractice rates rates are soaring, as caps on awards are being sought in more and more states.

Medical schools and teaching hospitals refuse to hold misbehaving medical student, interns, and residents accountable. Superiors make excuses.

If physicians were interested, they could clean up the profession. Why do they choose not to do so? And why does government not demand it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lapham is wrong Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Lapham is wrong Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Lapham is wrong Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Photon's feather is right. Posted by: maxpayne

Comments are closed-

The difference between a part and a whole.
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 24, 2009 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We take map-making so for granted that we seldom realize its power over our thinking.

In the context of the topic of health care, it means that our enormously complex physiology has been mapped by dividing it into manageable compartments—eye, ear, nose, and throat, to cite a familiar one. Hence, we are tempted to mistakenly treat ourselves as if we were assembled, consisting of substitutable parts, just like a machine.

So we can remove parts that threaten to disable other parts, and we can do organ transplants. The fact that we can talk about ourselves as an assembly of parts only means that we can relate our individual maps to each other. But the whole is more than the sum of its parts.

The map is not the territory. Organisms are not assemblies. Machines can be kept going indefinitely. Organisms cannot. Science reporters who use the maps to write their stories do us a disservice, when they treat us as machines.

We have learned to use tools to survive longer, and anatomy is a great tool. We dehumanize ourselves if we think we are just a collection of interchangeable parts. We are treated as such by merchandisers and politicians, and by doctors when they forget their oath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I love the smell of live, burning human hearts in the morning.
Posted by: zigy on Sep 24, 2009 1:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I loved Lewis Lapham when he was (the brilliant and still is that)editor of Harper's magazine and he had the courage and the perspacacity to take on the U.S. Establishment with the wit of Oscar Wild and the tenacity of a bulldog. And those were in the days when the "power elite", though corrupt, were relativly benign compared to the shear force of malicious, malevolent, and neferious evil they have become today.

More power to you, Mr. Lapham. Keep fighting the good fight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wow... Posted by: zigy

Comments are closed-

Props to Lewis Lapham
Posted by: zola77 on Sep 24, 2009 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Love his work. Great article.

If you havent seen his doco "The American Ruling Class", go see it immediately!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

insurers have the upper hand
Posted by: dealmeinfo2 on Sep 24, 2009 10:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets face it, insurance companies currently have the upper hand of the consumers. If they all raise their prices, what are you going to do, not have any health insurance. At the very least they need to open up state lines so insurance companies can compete with each other, otherwise we are all going to be screwed now that the baby boomers are getting up there in age.


-------------------------------
cello for sale

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Fascinating Americans !
Posted by: helieo on Sep 25, 2009 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From a "socialist" point of view (I live in Quebec after all), it is fascinating to see how pharms have succeeded in convincing the very peoplo who would profit from a single payer public option that their freedom and their very life would be threatened by it !! Rationing health care (unless you are willing to devote 95% of the gov budget on health) on the basis of science instead of profit : what is wrong with that !!! Wanting to maximaize its profit is certainly normal for an insurance company and that is exactly why health care should be private. Public (getting all the heavily sick) and private (picking the less vulnerable) cannot coexist when it comes to basic health care : that's a fundamental of the "assurance" concept, isn't. I have always been baffled by the way special interests have been able to manipulate the concept of freedom to their advantage in the USA. Sadly, it seems they will prevail again...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

TMH
Posted by: TMH on Sep 26, 2009 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't agree more with everything you wrote about the medical industrial complex and how it is killing us. I saw them do it to both my parents - it was obscene. Surgeries never calculated to prolong their lives or even help their suffering. In fact, surgery killed my mother and in my father's case, added immeasurably to his suffering as he was dying - they were both terminal when the surgeons insisted on the procedures. Once my parents were in the firm clutches of the medical industrial complex, there was nothing I could do to stop what they did to them. As a result, I do not trust this medical system at all and all I want when I'm where they were is to be left alone and I'm going to make damn sure I am.

The only part of your article I wish to take issue with is your argument that the government is ignoring the human side of this by making the economical argument. I believe that they have to make that argument to counter the widespread belief that we cannot afford to pay for this reform. I do not think the economic facet of reform is the main idea at all. I believe Obama spelled out the moral imperative here very well in his address to the joint session.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS