COMMENTS: 181
The Health Insurance Racket Is Manufacturing Entertainment Value from Pulling the Plug on Grandma
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.
Every day I get letters asking me to weigh in on the health care fracas. As if a redneck writer armed with a keyboard, a pack of smokes and all the misinformation and vitriol available on the Internet could contribute anything to the crap storm already in progress.
Besides that, my unreasoned but noisy take on this issue is often about as welcome as a fart in a spacesuit. None of which has ever stopped me from making a fool of myself in the past. So here goes.
There ain't any health care debate going on, Bubba. What is going on are mob negotiations about insurance and which mob gets the biggest chunk of the dough, be it our taxpayer dough or the geet that isn't in ole Jim's impoverished purse.
The hoo-ha is about the insurance racket, not the delivery of health care to human beings. It's simply another form of extorting the people regarding a fundamental need -- health care.
Unfortunately, the people have been mesmerized by our theater state's purposefully distracting and dramatic media productions for so long that they've been mutated toward helplessness. Consequently, they are incapable of asking themselves a simple question: If insurance corporation profits are one-third of the cost of health care, and all insurance corporations do is deliver our money to health care providers for us (or actually, do everything in their power to keep the money for themselves), why do we need insurance companies at all?
Answer: Because Wall Street gets a big piece of the action. And nobody messes with the Wall Street Mob (as the bailout extortion money proved). Better (and worse) presidents have tried. Some made a genuine effort to push it through Congress. Others expressed the desire publicly, but after getting privately muscled by the health care industry, decided to back off from the idea. For instance:
- Franklin Roosevelt wanted universal health care.
- Harry Truman wanted universal health care.
- Dwight Eisenhower wanted universal health care.
- Richard Nixon wanted universal health care.
- Lyndon Johnson wanted universal health care.
- Bill Clinton wanted -- well we can't definitely say because he made sure that if the issue blew up on him, which it did, Hillary would be left holding the turd. Is it any wonder that woman gets so snappy at the slightest provocation? First, getting left to hold the bag on health care, then the spots on that blue dress.
So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon? Because they live in an ideological cupcake land. It's a big neighborhood, a very special place where "Your vote is important" and "by electing the right candidate, you can change our beloved nation."
Most of America lives in that neighborhood, even though they've never personally met. It's a place where the shrubbery and flowerbeds of such things as "values" and "hope" bloom. Hope that our desires coupled with the efforts of a good and decent president can affect "change." Evidently these voters never heard the old adage, "Hope in one hand and piss in the other, and see which one fills up first."
The slaughter of the innocents by the health care lobby has pretty much extinguished the political usefulness of the word hope. Nobody, especially Obama, uses it now.
The first on-stage scuffle of the Obama administration, government-assured health care, quickly settled down into the accustomed scenario of very rich and powerful people in expensive suits "finding middle ground," otherwise known as the status quo.
Single-payer health care soon became "a consumer government alternative to private insurance," and is now "a system of health cooperatives. Next comes "slightly better health insurance (but not medical services) than before, from the same insurance companies but at twice the price; don't worry though, we're increasing your tax load so you can afford it."
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean on Aug 22, 2009 12:24 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get a hell of a lot of enjoyment out of it.Who are you to deny me it?
What else can I use to reconcile my fear of the U.S's nuclear arsenal and "game theory"view of the worlds people?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: Kati
» RE: INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Remember Me by Robert N. Test of Cincinnati, Ohio circ 1952
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: I'm Sorry too
Posted by: pete ess
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 22, 2009 12:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the same old lame excuse BS we tell ourselves every time it gets tough ... I say scream the truth, if only for the therapy. Joe can lay down in the road but they'll have to run over me standing up. Maybe he'll find some hope while he masturbates to the lingerie section of the 50 year old Sears catalog in his outhouse ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Aaah, mmckinl, then again there is that old City logic that is just...
Posted by: CynicI
» Right-wing troll ALERT! "CynicI" is "prophit(0)".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» So what? Maybe she changed her name because she was sick and tired of what was going on maybe?
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Ignorant, aren't you?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» I may not know prophit very well but I'm not totally ignorant.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» As I said newbie, until you get a clue, sit on your hands.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: NO SALE ! ... I'm Not Giving Up ...Good. I'm honestly glad to hear it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Same here. Don't let the rightwing hicks or the Obama cultists stop us from telling the truth.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» What was that--you lying fascist piece of garbage?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Impotent violence fantasies eh?
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» That stealth right-wing twit, Benn, called me fascist.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» My excuse guitarshill is
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» Projecting, wing-nut?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You chose C.
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» Rage? That's right wing-nut. Make sh*t up and hope sticks.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: What was that--you lying fascist piece of garbage?
Posted by: EJLima
» Oh, but it's just fine for Benn to slander me, right?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: What was that--you lying fascist piece of garbage?
Posted by: EJLima
» RE: NO SALE ! ... I'm Not Giving Up ...
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Aug 22, 2009 12:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell me, if Obama were not a crook, couldn't he simply stand up for what is right and then accept honorable defeat? It's not that he is faced with insurmountable obstacles; he is willingly a part of those obstacles. He's just another crooked gear in a crooked machine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hes just another crooked gear in a crooked machine
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» They can't control as many people as they are controlling...
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: They can't control as many people as they are controlling...
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» they don't need to control a majority--they only need to dominate and one of the easiest ways
Posted by: Suzon
» You are a very silly person.
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: You are a very silly person.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Don't confuse analysis with excuses for inaction
Posted by: luzmejor
» You misunderstand
Posted by: leafsong1
» Good advice, inhale if its politically expedient."
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» If you have been following my posts for any length of time
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CynicI on Aug 22, 2009 2:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will comment on the commentary at another time. I am still shaking my head and I do want to read this again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Spare us troll. Stow your "commentary", "prophit(0)".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Spare us your online negativity. You, foreverhope, Beck, etc ... need to grow up.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» You're an idiot, and you need to get a clue--newbie.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Online negativity.
Posted by: EJLima
» Actually, Mr. Bageant is proving CynicI technically correct.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» The troll writes, "...Obama is in full support of killing the elders on all fronts."
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Hint: Obama and Congress slowly "moving forward" on gutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Your opinion isn't proof, idiot. It's speculation, at best.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Accusing the president of plotting to kill "the elders" is a very serious charge, Benn.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Aug 22, 2009 2:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Boots
Posted by: GPFrank
» RE: Boots
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: Boots
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Aug 22, 2009 2:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health care is a national humanitarian crisis
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Brb007 on Aug 22, 2009 3:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very well put truth that many of us fail to see or admit. I find it ironic and absurd that we have remained fairly quiet, all while our government has squandered our futures and our nest eggs on speculative programs of little use to our majority, ridiculous bank bailouts, huge wars for profit and a plethora of other wasteful "causes" that only seem to benefit lobbyists and those in need of campaign fund boosts, but the first real effort that is made to use our tax payer monies for something that actually would benefit most of us directly, causes revolutionary reactions and such a fury, that I question what is really happening within our collective psyche. Are we now programmed to cut off our own nose, to spite our face?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Outstanding Point
Posted by: luzmejor
» I 2nd That!
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Outstanding Point
Posted by: Brb007
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 22, 2009 4:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the time he was known as William the Bastard, not William the Conquerer. He was a very nasty piece of work. In one area he was intent on controlling he salted the earth and made it barren for a hundred years. Salt was the Agent Orange of its time.
You can see him as the founder of the arms trade in which the UK and its outpost the US excel. He brought the stirrup to Britain and probably credited the technology with his victory in the Battle of Hastings, despite the fact that he probably won because the English troops were exhausted having traveled from the North where they had been fighting the Danes.
(He would fix upon the explanation that gave him the greatest glory.)
He also had 500 castles built. Previously, city walls had protected all of a city's population. Castles--narrow and high--allowed the king's men to spy upon the people. The portcullis (the very symbol of the UK Parliament to this day) was a cunning device which could trap any would-be invaders between two lowered gates (one dropped down behind them and one in front). Then the king's men could slaughter them from the parapet with arrows or vats of boiling oil. This turkey shoot brings to mind recent military adventures. And the castle with portcullis is a precursor of Congress with two classes of persons: the protected and the outsiders.
Killing grandma? Nothing new under the sun they say...
Oh, and the present royals are direct descendants of William I and the British people I've polled don't even know that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Way before the year 1067
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Glenn Beck should have a William C. Family Tree as a visual aid on his show
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Joe, it's an old story, going back to the Bible and even further..
Posted by: luzmejor
» So why support pols who will continue 1067? Is that "change" you can believe in?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nonaste on Aug 22, 2009 4:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Joe is right.
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: Joe is right.
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: timenotonmyside on Aug 22, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP sent grandma and grandpa out to town halls to tell the pols ''don't let the government interfere with my medicare''.
Since that's a real load of crap being dished, I say we ask grandma and grandpa for all the social security and medicare benefits that they have received since they were 65 and return those dollars to the SOCIALIST STATE OF AMERICA.
We don't even have to ask for interest on the money, just make them all pay it back.
If they don't want socialism, then they don't want their social security checks or their medicare benefits.
If they don't like that idea, then they should alll go live in a red state.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» the shouting matches were street theatre.....
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: '' In the corporately managed theater state,
Posted by: bigfoot 13ee
» Get together with sasquuatch55. After all, you'd make a perfect couple.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shill on Aug 22, 2009 5:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mattnrva on Aug 22, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that I see that we can't even get some kind of stupid "public option" passed, instead it looks like we'll end up with a bill that requires all to buy insurance from private insurance companies, and if someone can't afford it, the gov will end up paying the private insurance bill for them...yeah - what a big "change"...let's just keep on keeping on filling insurance companies bank accounts up...
And I've come to the conclusion that most Americans are just PLAIN STUPID!! Most of us don't ever think on our own -- instead, we allow ourselves to be easily manipulated into doing whatever the talking heads say on TV -- we are nothing but a bunch of CHUMPS being chumped -- all the way to the bank, and even past the bank...
I don't see any sign that the status quo will change here anytime soon, probably not in my lifetime (I am 34)....
Seriously, I have started looking at the process of emigration to Canada or some of the European countries, and the Middle East...I can't believe that so many people want to come to the U.S so badly...shit, I want to get out of here bad as hell...there is no hope left...because people are afraid (or just don't care about anything except their own money) to stand up for their true beliefs...people are afraid of the government -- when it should be the other way around, like it is in France...
The only possibility I see is if we (liberals & democratic socialists) band all our money together (at least a billion dollars) and start hiring lobbyists and lawyers to start making campaign "contributions" and taking congressmen & senators out to dinner, vacations, etc. -- just like the drug & insurance companies do -- we have to "outbribe" the others -- we have to make the lawmakers dependent on our money for their campaigns -- and make them DEATHLY AFRAID to vote against our interests -- just like they are now to vote against Corporate America!!
Sometimes, to rid the world of "evil", you have to become "evil" yourself for a while...to get the job done -- sometimes being a nice guy doesn't work...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't give up! That's what these bullies want.
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CTC123 on Aug 22, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Economic Pyramid
There are 2 sides to the Economic Pyramid,
NEGATIVE & POSITIVE
NEGATIVE side
At the top of the Pyramid, Health Care Industry X_____(Health Care Profiteers, Lobbyists,& Invested Interests), collect money from the consumer (U & I), and dispense Trick'le.down Health Care, their primary care is the bottom line.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Corporation X______(Natural Resource Profiteers,Lobbyists, & Invested Interests), their concern is the bookkeeping & accounting
of every thing "INTERNAL"(raw materials,
extraction,transporting,production,& sales)
and nothing "EX-TERNAL" (air & water pollution,coastal errosion,acid rain,rain forest destruction, etc.)
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
POSITIVE side
Conservation (The wise-use of the Earths natural resources).
Environmental Communication (Consumer information)
Search 4 the facts then act:
Medicare
Medicaid
Veterans Administration
Health Care for Americans NOW!
www.aft.org/fight4america
www.consumersunion.org
www.WeWantThePublicOption.com
www.ourfuture.org/action
Where is the Economic Pyramid
Search 4 me:
CTC123GREEN
Great article, Joe Bageant
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 22, 2009 6:07 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look for HANAFIN!
Look for IRISH MOM!
Look for my web site Ireland-L & Ireland-D Mail List Web Site. It is lovely but slow to load on my old old puter!
Hopie hopes you enjoy!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» SPAM REPORTED !
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Leave her alone, Benn.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ETSpoon on Aug 22, 2009 6:10 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They want you to think it is O.K. for doctors to hammer gran'ma!!!!!*
*Note to all who can not differenctiate sarcsm from irony from satire from black humor from straight commentary. The above statement is in reference to a comment on an Alternet essay a few weeks back. Guess it isn't all the funny now.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 22, 2009 6:21 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is that frigging simple!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» By your own definition, Obama and Congress are then discriminating.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: MINDLESS OPPOSITION TO HEALTH CARE REFORM IS DISCRIMINATION!
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Triton on Aug 22, 2009 6:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nazi philosophies attract the selfish and greedy..
Posted by: luzmejor
» Historical Amnesia Alert!
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 22, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow! Wow! Wow!
OMG! Find this and see what they are up to now!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.........
Shit! They are blaming him because he is popular in the rest of the world!
They are running so scared this is blowing my mind! so so desperate now! OMG!
HOLY SHIT!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO............
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO! MR. PRESIDENT!
Posted by: foreverhope
» DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» MY SINCERE APOLOGY TO ALEX WITT!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: Kati
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO!
Posted by: luzmejor
» Is the puppet show exciting you, sweetie?
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Aug 22, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oops I did it again, voted for the lesser of two evils. Joe's article made me smile, even though Progressives should be crying and planning for real change. Hahahahahahahaha Tell me it's not so in "cupcake land"!!!
Voting for me is like overeating on Pizza I vow never to do it again but next time around I can't resist. Progressives have been thrown overboard, health care reform is a laugh just like when "HE" laughed at all those crazy Internet jokers that want drug reform.
It's all over BUT the crying, or is it? Let's talk about some viable Third Party candidates. Let us start the media blitz early rather than later. I'm willing to give it ONE more try.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: slinkyDomo on Aug 22, 2009 6:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Online Privacy when it Counts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gimmicks
Posted by: wrinklemomma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Aug 22, 2009 7:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"EVERY US CITIZEN DESERVES AS DIGNIFIED AND AS PAIN FREE A DEATH AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE"
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "EVERY US CITIZEN DESERVES AS DIGNIFIED AND AS PAIN FREE A DEATH AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE"
Posted by: EJLima
» EJLima, I concur with you.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Aug 22, 2009 7:12 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, about that saving you from McCain/Palin thing, you're welcome. I know, I know, it would be exactly the same, said the straw man. However, the Republicans who were here yesterday and are certainly either here now or are about to be seem to virulently disagree. I have to assume that were Obama as identical to McCain as is constantly claimed that this article with this title couldn't have been written. It IS Republicans furious at Obama, terrified that any compromise will happen, and tossing around the idea Obama's death panels will do Grandma and Grandpa in.
In my opinion, "ideological cupcake land" describes many people, many ideologies, Democrats least of all. The worst cupcake land is that which claims that despite reality, we should be getting instant change to the purest forms of society and politics we want. I have never seen or heard of anything like that happening, ever. I've seen and heard of great struggles that took fairly long periods of time and often seemed futile and hopeless, but instant, huge change? Brought about by people (not the writer of this article) seeming to think their course is sitting on the margins dictating the actions of political groups they have active contempt for? When has this ever happened?
Anyone who sees what needs done, please get going on your goals and your hopes. Why the Dems are an ideological whipping post is beyond me. Because that's way too often the criticism: the ideology of the Democrats is wrong. Well, welcome to real life! Other parties do not have to conform to your ideals. If you want to, bring your ideas to life. Fight for them, take action, put your life on hold and work for what you want. It's bizarre that no one much seems to do this; it seems to be enough to constantly holler that the Democrats aren't. Anyone thinking that the Democratic party is a huge failure is not supposed to then use that judgement to sit idle and continue blaming. This is probably the strangest political situation imaginable, much idleness, lots of big talk, a convenient huge group to blame everything on. That seems to be the American way, and the conservatives taught us this very well. No matter what, find a big group (Unions! Teachers! Communists! Liberals!) that you do not belong to and claim not only that only THAT group can and should fix anything and everything, but also that only YOUR group really has the savvy to know what's going on, what should be done, not to mention that nothing is either your fault or your responsibility. It's a recipe for status quo, but apparently if it's a smug, self-satisfied status quo, it's worth the continuation.
One last thing: this may be the strangest situation, but it's also surely the most common throughout history. Textbooks don't record it, but it seems certain that mostly people have sat and talked about what everyone else is doing wrong. Sometimes, rarely, a small group, the suffragettes, the early environmentalists, whoever, actually start something, and usually it doesn't look worth continuing. It was about 70 years before the goals of the suffragettes were realized. They themselves didn't live to see it. They kept going, and new generations took over. Probably there were many who hollered and bitched and moaned that they didn't pull it off in 6 months. And that they COULD have if they just weren't corrupt or really cared or whatever. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're sick of yourself because you keep denying reality and are too busy
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» You tell the "truth", Benn?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Who cares about ratings? The country is falling apart already !
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Aug 22, 2009 7:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Joe Baegeant, lots of truth to this but the mobsters are not only the rightwing hicks but also
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Joe Baegeant, lots of truth to this but the mobsters are not only the rightwing hicks but also
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» He's trying to be as hip as me!!
Posted by: sausage
» RE: He's trying to be as hip as me!!
Posted by: carsoncitygal
» CG, the Obama cultists have driven off reasonable debating.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» The Republicans love you sausage.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: The Republicans love you sausage.
Posted by: wrinklemomma
» RE: The Republicans love you sausage.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 22, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MrEdward! on Aug 22, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And for those who believe in "private insurance"
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kettleblack on Aug 22, 2009 8:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Red States can enact their plans, and the Blue States can enact their plans. No plan will be perfect, but at least we won't have put our collective a$$ets in one pile. We might even come up with a plan that actually works. Or, we could take the best of all the plans and come up with a national plan.
Oh, wait. That's exactly why they want one plan - so they can skim off the top again. Silly me - it's the old pyramid game being set up for us.
We just happen to belong to that "mob" of people who are disorganized, unfunded, and the majority. We happen to belong to the "mob" that they want to take the money from. Again.
The roulette wheel is spinning! Place your bets!
Welcome to the Health insurance Casino!
Brought to you by your very own Kongress-person, paid in full.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That's how it started in Canada.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Why don't we let each state decide their own health care policy?
Posted by: MrEdward!
» Because the Feds want the money
Posted by: james108
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rmuldavin on Aug 22, 2009 9:46 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
realize numerals can be numbers,
Two-way links(N)= N(N-1)/2=2,556,
Time typing, robots or not, 1/2 chance,
Gold and silver coined drives message.
Poetry may rescue, if lines kept fairly short,
next set the tone, slowly build another part,
for emotions can set the theme to cast net,
fish caught may nibble on advertising bait,
Does each blogger become a throwaway?
Calculate your prophet, include yourself,
time to get off the shelf and on to the table,
conversation with others part of the eating,
never stop competing till confusion triggers,
then starts the desert to sweetly stop hunger.
Best, rm
PS at N=90, L(90)~8100/2=4050 bloggers a gone.
Some came back. Best again
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carsoncitygal on Aug 22, 2009 9:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mr. Bageant, Serious progressives won't have to tolerate Obama or whoever the GOP nominee is by
Posted by: rmuldavin
» THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT: THE REAL HEATHCARE OPTION WILL ONLY COME FROM A POLITICAL ONE
Posted by: ScoobyDoobyDoo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kati on Aug 22, 2009 10:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm also sorry that the Alternet comments/discussions on your article are so off topic... (ideological?)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: drone
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: drone
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: Kati
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Aug 22, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So said Strother Martin who portrayed a sadistic and corrupt prison warden upon the capture and return to the chain gang of Cool Hand Luke (Paul Newman).
Like the warden, the insurance and drug racketeers have distorted the disgraceful facts of their inhumanity and pathological greed by constructing a bizarre "reality" of their own making, and successfully selling it to hysterical twits and racial bigots.
It appears the ONLY solution to any real healthcare reform is going ahead with a more humane program, fools and greedy bastards notwithstanding. If this means slam-dunking it into the faces of neocons and their stooges in congress and the senate, so be it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EJLima on Aug 22, 2009 11:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Find it. $$
3. Chase it. $$$
4. Catch it. $$$$
5. Love it. $$$$$
6. Worship it. $$$$$$
7. Become SATAN and lose it and die.
Because they cannot take it with them where they are going and when the next satan wannabees find the evil works they have done worthy their image is stamped and printed on what they worship. Be careful what you worship and wish for.
MATTHEW ch22-v21
ch23-v2....v38
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Aug 22, 2009 12:02 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Aug 22, 2009 2:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cathyc on Aug 22, 2009 3:38 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
------------
LOL! Hey Joe, I read your book "Deerhunting with Jesus". Good read. Americans are fucking crazy... not all, but MOST Americans are!
Bring it on!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anubis12 on Aug 22, 2009 4:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially health care is a topic that gets under my skin because my relatives lost the usual work provided health care, after my stepfather lost his regular job as a journalist and moved into freelancing.
I don't like to preach because American affairs are really none of my business as a German. Still I feel that I need to share the outrage I feel when I see the sort of lies and propaganda that is spread about European health care systems in the media in the US.
Since European models show that public health care works very well and provides a level of freedom to people, that most of the Americans I talked to here in Germany can't even believe, the most reasonable thing to do in this whole debate is to point the finger at our systems and make it known, that they are great.
And compared to other European states Germany doesn't even have an especially good one (public/private mix instead of public only). But still... everyone is insured and is getting treated. No people dumped on the curb here, by hospitals because they don't have insurance.
Recently I watched the Daily Show, where Jon interviewed some politican about health care and said : "I don't get it... there are 50 million uninsured. Let's insure them. How big a bill do you need to do that ?"
That speaks from my heart. Health is a human right, not something to gain from. Anyway... I really hope it's going to happen and I'm glad I could share my thoughts with the Alternet crowd.
Greetings from Germany,
Jan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A comment from the old world
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: A comment from the old world
Posted by: anubis12
» RE: A comment from the old world
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeanne on Aug 22, 2009 6:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The play is a tragedy or a farce, take your pick. The object is to distract the public with the appearance of an epic battle. But, the outcome is predetermined. The fighter (if I'm allowed to mix metaphors) is supposed to throw the fight in the tenth. The pretense of working with the Republicans, who are playing their walk-on role as the evil villain to perfection (mostly because there isn't any acting involved on their part). The Democrats are well-cast in their weak, ineffectual role as victim.
Just before the curtain falls, Congress will produce the "BILL" the Frankenstein's Monster they've been trying so hard to bring forth. It will have no public option, no single-payer, no assurance of affordability. It will have a mandate that all Americans must buy insurance, and it will ask the insurance industry to "play nice, please." Obama will sign the bill -- his way of draping a sign over it that says, "Reform." Out will come the "Applause" sign. And Congress, the President and the Insurance companies will go to the after-play party, congratulating themselves on their masterful performance.
The American people will be left with the ticket stubs, and the distinct feeling that we've just been had.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's so obvious
Posted by: leafsong1
» Thank you Jeanne. Flawless analysis and smart prediction.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 7:17 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I Am Not Talking Shit Here
I Am Talking Scaffolders
They Build The Infrastructure
Whilst You Cunts Think You Had an EMPIRE
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 7:38 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Do You Mean - We Can't Do That?
We Can Also Grill WAR CRIMINALS Who went along with the easy option to take the money and tell lies - we know who you are - You are Criminals AGAINST HUMANITY
Well We LOVE OUR FRIENDS
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 8:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But all I have taken with me is my Beautiful Girlfriend
No Guns, No Bombs
Just Love
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 8:35 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i thought they were neaerly as good as led zeppeolinm
and they keep coming back
now i can't think of a single murican musician in the same league
Neil Young Is a Canadian
And Well...
Ted Nugent is Deaf
The Next President Of America Should Be Lemmy
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You have poor taste in music, Tony. (I'm jokin', Tony)
Posted by: GuitarBill
» ....and that's where he passed out and spilled his drink...
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goodsensecynic on Aug 23, 2009 7:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, he remains somewhat stuck in the icing atop his description of "Cupcake Land," overly emphasizing "ideology" as ultimately autonomous. He also - presumably in the interest of hyperbole - overstates the case: I am pretty sure, for instance, that insurance company profits do not account for over 30% of health care expenses in the USA (although if you add in redundant insurance company administrative costs and the profits of other private health industries - e.g., pharmaceutical companies - he may not be far off the mark). There are other possible exaggerations. I am (almost) sure that the average American's private insurance company premiums are not more than $13,000 per annum (quite). And so on. Such incidentals detract somewhat from his argument and give his opponents the opportunity to focus on small points while distracting others from the larger ones.
The crucial issues of the false debates, the silliness of the "death panels" (insurance companies dropping people with catastrophic illnesses or denying people with "pre-existing conditions" are surely more mendacious than encouraging psychological counselling for terminal patients and the filing of "living wills"), and all the foaming-at-the-mouth about socialism are among those larger matters.
Constructing a comprehensive critique of the political economy of late capitalism and dissecting the fundamental conspiracy, collusion, connivance, collaboration and community of consciousness (call it what you will) among the RNC, the DNC, President Obama, the corporate media and those who own and control the mode, means and relations of the production and distribution of goods and services provides a pretty good fix on how "the fix is in" (and has been from the outset on health care - to say nothing of education, labour relations, civil rights and criminal justice, environmental sustainability and the rest of the domestic and foreign policy inventory).
All of this would be amusing in a ghoulish sort of way, if it were not for the harm it does to the American people, now propagandized into a kind of Zombie-stupor, and for people like me who live outside the United States and who reasonably fear that this kind of political toxicity could easily spread into an ideological pandemic. It is bad enough that we have to worry about the always ticking population bomb, irrational religious fanatics and so on, but to have the "leader of the free world" (not Mr. Obama himself, but the United States of America) self-immobilized and self-destructive is a damned shame.
What's worse, anyone who has the temerity to take a decent history, to perform an accurate diagnosis and to recommend an appropriate therapy for this imperial sick puppy of technological modernity is rendered immediately eligible for predismissal by American liberals and conservatives alike (and they are fundamentally alike) on the grounds of paranoid delusion.
Now, that is the real Catch-22.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Aug 23, 2009 7:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: bigfoot 13ee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 23, 2009 8:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The final hope stated in this excellent article is probably the only one that stands a snowcone's chance in hell of affecting any real change – although when it gets to that point, what change we get will be a roll of the dice. But I'll take what I can get ....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We need another March On Washington –– a REALLY BIG one.
Posted by: Karina
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on Aug 23, 2009 12:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of the movie The Matrix. In that movie,humans invent artificially intelligent robots in the lat 21st century, and these robots are treated as slaves. The robots rebel and world war results in which humans loose. The robots decide to hook up humanity to a massive supercomputer called the Matrix, where humans live in a artificial reality were they are happy,oblivious to they fact that they are in prison,basically. A few humans manage to break out from the matrix, and form a resistance that can jack in and out of the matrix at will,and fights the robots inside and outside the matrix. Besides being a badass sci-fi action movie(it was the Matrix that invented bullet time and helped make Japanese anime popular) it was very deep and actually held up a mirror to how the government/media dominants US society.
I suggest everyone who wants to understand how our healthcare debate is screwed up, and what is wrong with America in general and the media in particular, read a book called Idiot America by Charles P Pierce . In it he points out how facts,logic,and truth are no longer important,but emotions(which he calls the GUT)popularity and profit are important. How skill and expertise are seen as weird and dishonest. He examines such things as intelligent design vs. evolution,talk radio,the Terry Schiavo incident and much much more to show us what is wrong with this country. Its a great book for not just understanding our culture,government, and media,but also our American brothers and sisters who live in Idiot America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nike Dunk on Aug 23, 2009 10:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tmgibs on Aug 23, 2009 10:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mtcloud on Aug 24, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
August 20, 2009
I'm getting very upset by what I've been seeing since this health care issue has come to the fore. I'm becoming really angry by how much my intelligence has been insulted. I'm beginning to feel like the man who has to explain to his friends that Criss Angel is not really defying the laws of physics. He's in the business of creating illusions. He does not really float above buildings, pull ladies in half, climb through closed, solid windows without breaking the glass, walk on water, or do any of the things one might see him do. These are illusions. They are parlor tricks. They are elaborate, complicated, well designed, well executed, likely expensive illusions, but they are nothing but illusions nonetheless.
The power elite are also in the business of creating illusions. They use their politicians and the mass media to try to create a perception of reality they would like us to see. The illusions they create are elaborate, complicated, well designed, well executed and likely expensive, but they are illusions nonetheless. The difference between the illusions the power elite create and those of Criss Angel is that Mr. Angel creates his illusions strictly for entertainment purposes, the power elite are creating theirs so that they can control mass consciousness and hence make it easier to control the population in general. The problem for them is that many people are beginning to realize exactly what's been happening.
One of the ways to create a good illusion is to get the audience to look over there while something is happening over here. Another is to keep things hidden and produce them when you want them seen. Still another way is to make the audience believe something isn't what it appears to be, or that something is what it doesn't appear to be. Or any combination of these things can help produce a good illusion. Of course, if the audience looks where the action is and detects the slight of hand, or if they see the hidden element before it is produced, or if they are not convinced that something is or is not something else, then the illusion is ruined.
There was a man in New Hampshire recently who came to a protest against the proposed health care legislation open carrying a gun. His name was Mr. William Kostric. He was also carrying a sign that read "It is time to water the tree of liberty." This protest was near where Mr. Barack Obama was having a town hall meeting. What's wrong with that? We have a God given right of self defense, don't we? The second amendment of our nation's constitution still applies, right? Holding a sign at a protest is legal, so no big deal, right? Open carrying in New Hampshire is legal, so no big deal, right? Wrong. The media jumped all over it. They made it a big deal.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billybookworm on Aug 24, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Death panels? Every insurance company has these, they are called actuaries and underwriters.
At least the Mafia has a code that discourages the killing of innocents.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Aug 24, 2009 5:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Problems:
1. Doctors have to pay high premiums for malpractice insurance and of course this is ultimately paid for by the patients.
2. Doctors often have to practice "defensive medicine" to protect themselves from possible frivolous law suits. The means doing unnecessary testing on patients so as to establish a baseline health profile, thus increasing costs.
Some Solutions:
Insurance companies should band together to share the cost of covering individuals with pre-existing conditions
More people will be able to afford health insurance if premiums are tax deductible.
Insurance companies charge employers 15 percent to 25 percent in overhead expenses for every prepaid health care dollar. The patient's $20 co-pay for a $100 service requires $115 to $125 in premiums even though the doctor receives only $100. So why not pay the $100 directly using pretax dollars? Flexible spending accounts, health reimbursement arrangements and health savings accounts are growing in popularity since they allow pretax payment of personal medical bills.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: assss on Aug 25, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
juicy couture charms
juicy couture jewelry
juicy couture charms
juicy couture charms
juicy couture jewelry
juicy jewelry
juicy charms
juicy charms
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Aug 26, 2009 12:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ElMikeo on Aug 26, 2009 9:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mike- Life Insurance
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lee123 on Aug 27, 2009 1:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ethrop on Aug 27, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtpatrick108 on Aug 27, 2009 5:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 2snak on Aug 29, 2009 6:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has to be some common sense rationing. But who wants anyone to decide that for them?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Sep 3, 2009 10:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean on Aug 22, 2009 12:24 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get a hell of a lot of enjoyment out of it.Who are you to deny me it?
What else can I use to reconcile my fear of the U.S's nuclear arsenal and "game theory"view of the worlds people?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: Kati
» RE: INVESTIGATE THE MANY VARIOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN W/CHENEY & THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY!!!
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Remember Me by Robert N. Test of Cincinnati, Ohio circ 1952
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: I'm Sorry too
Posted by: pete ess
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 22, 2009 12:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the same old lame excuse BS we tell ourselves every time it gets tough ... I say scream the truth, if only for the therapy. Joe can lay down in the road but they'll have to run over me standing up. Maybe he'll find some hope while he masturbates to the lingerie section of the 50 year old Sears catalog in his outhouse ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Aaah, mmckinl, then again there is that old City logic that is just...
Posted by: CynicI
» Right-wing troll ALERT! "CynicI" is "prophit(0)".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» So what? Maybe she changed her name because she was sick and tired of what was going on maybe?
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Ignorant, aren't you?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» I may not know prophit very well but I'm not totally ignorant.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» As I said newbie, until you get a clue, sit on your hands.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: NO SALE ! ... I'm Not Giving Up ...Good. I'm honestly glad to hear it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Same here. Don't let the rightwing hicks or the Obama cultists stop us from telling the truth.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» What was that--you lying fascist piece of garbage?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Impotent violence fantasies eh?
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» That stealth right-wing twit, Benn, called me fascist.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» My excuse guitarshill is
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» Projecting, wing-nut?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You chose C.
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» Rage? That's right wing-nut. Make sh*t up and hope sticks.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: What was that--you lying fascist piece of garbage?
Posted by: EJLima
» Oh, but it's just fine for Benn to slander me, right?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: What was that--you lying fascist piece of garbage?
Posted by: EJLima
» RE: NO SALE ! ... I'm Not Giving Up ...
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Aug 22, 2009 12:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell me, if Obama were not a crook, couldn't he simply stand up for what is right and then accept honorable defeat? It's not that he is faced with insurmountable obstacles; he is willingly a part of those obstacles. He's just another crooked gear in a crooked machine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hes just another crooked gear in a crooked machine
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» They can't control as many people as they are controlling...
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: They can't control as many people as they are controlling...
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» they don't need to control a majority--they only need to dominate and one of the easiest ways
Posted by: Suzon
» You are a very silly person.
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: You are a very silly person.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Don't confuse analysis with excuses for inaction
Posted by: luzmejor
» You misunderstand
Posted by: leafsong1
» Good advice, inhale if its politically expedient."
Posted by: Mathew Trisencusean
» If you have been following my posts for any length of time
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CynicI on Aug 22, 2009 2:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will comment on the commentary at another time. I am still shaking my head and I do want to read this again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Spare us troll. Stow your "commentary", "prophit(0)".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Spare us your online negativity. You, foreverhope, Beck, etc ... need to grow up.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» You're an idiot, and you need to get a clue--newbie.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Online negativity.
Posted by: EJLima
» Actually, Mr. Bageant is proving CynicI technically correct.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» The troll writes, "...Obama is in full support of killing the elders on all fronts."
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Hint: Obama and Congress slowly "moving forward" on gutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Your opinion isn't proof, idiot. It's speculation, at best.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Accusing the president of plotting to kill "the elders" is a very serious charge, Benn.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Aug 22, 2009 2:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Boots
Posted by: GPFrank
» RE: Boots
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: Boots
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Aug 22, 2009 2:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health care is a national humanitarian crisis
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Brb007 on Aug 22, 2009 3:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very well put truth that many of us fail to see or admit. I find it ironic and absurd that we have remained fairly quiet, all while our government has squandered our futures and our nest eggs on speculative programs of little use to our majority, ridiculous bank bailouts, huge wars for profit and a plethora of other wasteful "causes" that only seem to benefit lobbyists and those in need of campaign fund boosts, but the first real effort that is made to use our tax payer monies for something that actually would benefit most of us directly, causes revolutionary reactions and such a fury, that I question what is really happening within our collective psyche. Are we now programmed to cut off our own nose, to spite our face?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Outstanding Point
Posted by: luzmejor
» I 2nd That!
Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Outstanding Point
Posted by: Brb007
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 22, 2009 4:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the time he was known as William the Bastard, not William the Conquerer. He was a very nasty piece of work. In one area he was intent on controlling he salted the earth and made it barren for a hundred years. Salt was the Agent Orange of its time.
You can see him as the founder of the arms trade in which the UK and its outpost the US excel. He brought the stirrup to Britain and probably credited the technology with his victory in the Battle of Hastings, despite the fact that he probably won because the English troops were exhausted having traveled from the North where they had been fighting the Danes.
(He would fix upon the explanation that gave him the greatest glory.)
He also had 500 castles built. Previously, city walls had protected all of a city's population. Castles--narrow and high--allowed the king's men to spy upon the people. The portcullis (the very symbol of the UK Parliament to this day) was a cunning device which could trap any would-be invaders between two lowered gates (one dropped down behind them and one in front). Then the king's men could slaughter them from the parapet with arrows or vats of boiling oil. This turkey shoot brings to mind recent military adventures. And the castle with portcullis is a precursor of Congress with two classes of persons: the protected and the outsiders.
Killing grandma? Nothing new under the sun they say...
Oh, and the present royals are direct descendants of William I and the British people I've polled don't even know that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Way before the year 1067
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Glenn Beck should have a William C. Family Tree as a visual aid on his show
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Joe, it's an old story, going back to the Bible and even further..
Posted by: luzmejor
» So why support pols who will continue 1067? Is that "change" you can believe in?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nonaste on Aug 22, 2009 4:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Joe is right.
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: Joe is right.
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: timenotonmyside on Aug 22, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP sent grandma and grandpa out to town halls to tell the pols ''don't let the government interfere with my medicare''.
Since that's a real load of crap being dished, I say we ask grandma and grandpa for all the social security and medicare benefits that they have received since they were 65 and return those dollars to the SOCIALIST STATE OF AMERICA.
We don't even have to ask for interest on the money, just make them all pay it back.
If they don't want socialism, then they don't want their social security checks or their medicare benefits.
If they don't like that idea, then they should alll go live in a red state.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» the shouting matches were street theatre.....
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: '' In the corporately managed theater state,
Posted by: bigfoot 13ee
» Get together with sasquuatch55. After all, you'd make a perfect couple.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shill on Aug 22, 2009 5:05 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mattnrva on Aug 22, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that I see that we can't even get some kind of stupid "public option" passed, instead it looks like we'll end up with a bill that requires all to buy insurance from private insurance companies, and if someone can't afford it, the gov will end up paying the private insurance bill for them...yeah - what a big "change"...let's just keep on keeping on filling insurance companies bank accounts up...
And I've come to the conclusion that most Americans are just PLAIN STUPID!! Most of us don't ever think on our own -- instead, we allow ourselves to be easily manipulated into doing whatever the talking heads say on TV -- we are nothing but a bunch of CHUMPS being chumped -- all the way to the bank, and even past the bank...
I don't see any sign that the status quo will change here anytime soon, probably not in my lifetime (I am 34)....
Seriously, I have started looking at the process of emigration to Canada or some of the European countries, and the Middle East...I can't believe that so many people want to come to the U.S so badly...shit, I want to get out of here bad as hell...there is no hope left...because people are afraid (or just don't care about anything except their own money) to stand up for their true beliefs...people are afraid of the government -- when it should be the other way around, like it is in France...
The only possibility I see is if we (liberals & democratic socialists) band all our money together (at least a billion dollars) and start hiring lobbyists and lawyers to start making campaign "contributions" and taking congressmen & senators out to dinner, vacations, etc. -- just like the drug & insurance companies do -- we have to "outbribe" the others -- we have to make the lawmakers dependent on our money for their campaigns -- and make them DEATHLY AFRAID to vote against our interests -- just like they are now to vote against Corporate America!!
Sometimes, to rid the world of "evil", you have to become "evil" yourself for a while...to get the job done -- sometimes being a nice guy doesn't work...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't give up! That's what these bullies want.
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CTC123 on Aug 22, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Economic Pyramid
There are 2 sides to the Economic Pyramid,
NEGATIVE & POSITIVE
NEGATIVE side
At the top of the Pyramid, Health Care Industry X_____(Health Care Profiteers, Lobbyists,& Invested Interests), collect money from the consumer (U & I), and dispense Trick'le.down Health Care, their primary care is the bottom line.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Corporation X______(Natural Resource Profiteers,Lobbyists, & Invested Interests), their concern is the bookkeeping & accounting
of every thing "INTERNAL"(raw materials,
extraction,transporting,production,& sales)
and nothing "EX-TERNAL" (air & water pollution,coastal errosion,acid rain,rain forest destruction, etc.)
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
POSITIVE side
Conservation (The wise-use of the Earths natural resources).
Environmental Communication (Consumer information)
Search 4 the facts then act:
Medicare
Medicaid
Veterans Administration
Health Care for Americans NOW!
www.aft.org/fight4america
www.consumersunion.org
www.WeWantThePublicOption.com
www.ourfuture.org/action
Where is the Economic Pyramid
Search 4 me:
CTC123GREEN
Great article, Joe Bageant
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 22, 2009 6:07 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look for HANAFIN!
Look for IRISH MOM!
Look for my web site Ireland-L & Ireland-D Mail List Web Site. It is lovely but slow to load on my old old puter!
Hopie hopes you enjoy!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» SPAM REPORTED !
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» Leave her alone, Benn.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ETSpoon on Aug 22, 2009 6:10 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They want you to think it is O.K. for doctors to hammer gran'ma!!!!!*
*Note to all who can not differenctiate sarcsm from irony from satire from black humor from straight commentary. The above statement is in reference to a comment on an Alternet essay a few weeks back. Guess it isn't all the funny now.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 22, 2009 6:21 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is that frigging simple!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» By your own definition, Obama and Congress are then discriminating.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: MINDLESS OPPOSITION TO HEALTH CARE REFORM IS DISCRIMINATION!
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Triton on Aug 22, 2009 6:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nazi philosophies attract the selfish and greedy..
Posted by: luzmejor
» Historical Amnesia Alert!
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 22, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow! Wow! Wow!
OMG! Find this and see what they are up to now!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.........
Shit! They are blaming him because he is popular in the rest of the world!
They are running so scared this is blowing my mind! so so desperate now! OMG!
HOLY SHIT!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO............
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO! MR. PRESIDENT!
Posted by: foreverhope
» DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: foreverhope
» MY SINCERE APOLOGY TO ALEX WITT!
Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: DEAR MR. PRESIDENT! BEGIN ARMING THE U.N. TODAY!
Posted by: Kati
» RE: WOW! THEY ARE LOSING IT! GO! GO! GO!
Posted by: luzmejor
» Is the puppet show exciting you, sweetie?
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Aug 22, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oops I did it again, voted for the lesser of two evils. Joe's article made me smile, even though Progressives should be crying and planning for real change. Hahahahahahahaha Tell me it's not so in "cupcake land"!!!
Voting for me is like overeating on Pizza I vow never to do it again but next time around I can't resist. Progressives have been thrown overboard, health care reform is a laugh just like when "HE" laughed at all those crazy Internet jokers that want drug reform.
It's all over BUT the crying, or is it? Let's talk about some viable Third Party candidates. Let us start the media blitz early rather than later. I'm willing to give it ONE more try.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: slinkyDomo on Aug 22, 2009 6:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Online Privacy when it Counts
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gimmicks
Posted by: wrinklemomma
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Aug 22, 2009 7:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"EVERY US CITIZEN DESERVES AS DIGNIFIED AND AS PAIN FREE A DEATH AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE"
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "EVERY US CITIZEN DESERVES AS DIGNIFIED AND AS PAIN FREE A DEATH AS IS HUMANLY POSSIBLE"
Posted by: EJLima
» EJLima, I concur with you.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Aug 22, 2009 7:12 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, about that saving you from McCain/Palin thing, you're welcome. I know, I know, it would be exactly the same, said the straw man. However, the Republicans who were here yesterday and are certainly either here now or are about to be seem to virulently disagree. I have to assume that were Obama as identical to McCain as is constantly claimed that this article with this title couldn't have been written. It IS Republicans furious at Obama, terrified that any compromise will happen, and tossing around the idea Obama's death panels will do Grandma and Grandpa in.
In my opinion, "ideological cupcake land" describes many people, many ideologies, Democrats least of all. The worst cupcake land is that which claims that despite reality, we should be getting instant change to the purest forms of society and politics we want. I have never seen or heard of anything like that happening, ever. I've seen and heard of great struggles that took fairly long periods of time and often seemed futile and hopeless, but instant, huge change? Brought about by people (not the writer of this article) seeming to think their course is sitting on the margins dictating the actions of political groups they have active contempt for? When has this ever happened?
Anyone who sees what needs done, please get going on your goals and your hopes. Why the Dems are an ideological whipping post is beyond me. Because that's way too often the criticism: the ideology of the Democrats is wrong. Well, welcome to real life! Other parties do not have to conform to your ideals. If you want to, bring your ideas to life. Fight for them, take action, put your life on hold and work for what you want. It's bizarre that no one much seems to do this; it seems to be enough to constantly holler that the Democrats aren't. Anyone thinking that the Democratic party is a huge failure is not supposed to then use that judgement to sit idle and continue blaming. This is probably the strangest political situation imaginable, much idleness, lots of big talk, a convenient huge group to blame everything on. That seems to be the American way, and the conservatives taught us this very well. No matter what, find a big group (Unions! Teachers! Communists! Liberals!) that you do not belong to and claim not only that only THAT group can and should fix anything and everything, but also that only YOUR group really has the savvy to know what's going on, what should be done, not to mention that nothing is either your fault or your responsibility. It's a recipe for status quo, but apparently if it's a smug, self-satisfied status quo, it's worth the continuation.
One last thing: this may be the strangest situation, but it's also surely the most common throughout history. Textbooks don't record it, but it seems certain that mostly people have sat and talked about what everyone else is doing wrong. Sometimes, rarely, a small group, the suffragettes, the early environmentalists, whoever, actually start something, and usually it doesn't look worth continuing. It was about 70 years before the goals of the suffragettes were realized. They themselves didn't live to see it. They kept going, and new generations took over. Probably there were many who hollered and bitched and moaned that they didn't pull it off in 6 months. And that they COULD have if they just weren't corrupt or really cared or whatever. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're sick of yourself because you keep denying reality and are too busy
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» You tell the "truth", Benn?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Who cares about ratings? The country is falling apart already !
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: "Because they live in an ideological cupcake land."
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Aug 22, 2009 7:15 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Joe Baegeant, lots of truth to this but the mobsters are not only the rightwing hicks but also
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Joe Baegeant, lots of truth to this but the mobsters are not only the rightwing hicks but also
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» He's trying to be as hip as me!!
Posted by: sausage
» RE: He's trying to be as hip as me!!
Posted by: carsoncitygal
» CG, the Obama cultists have driven off reasonable debating.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» The Republicans love you sausage.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: The Republicans love you sausage.
Posted by: wrinklemomma
» RE: The Republicans love you sausage.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 22, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MrEdward! on Aug 22, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And for those who believe in "private insurance"
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kettleblack on Aug 22, 2009 8:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Red States can enact their plans, and the Blue States can enact their plans. No plan will be perfect, but at least we won't have put our collective a$$ets in one pile. We might even come up with a plan that actually works. Or, we could take the best of all the plans and come up with a national plan.
Oh, wait. That's exactly why they want one plan - so they can skim off the top again. Silly me - it's the old pyramid game being set up for us.
We just happen to belong to that "mob" of people who are disorganized, unfunded, and the majority. We happen to belong to the "mob" that they want to take the money from. Again.
The roulette wheel is spinning! Place your bets!
Welcome to the Health insurance Casino!
Brought to you by your very own Kongress-person, paid in full.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That's how it started in Canada.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Why don't we let each state decide their own health care policy?
Posted by: MrEdward!
» Because the Feds want the money
Posted by: james108
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rmuldavin on Aug 22, 2009 9:46 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
realize numerals can be numbers,
Two-way links(N)= N(N-1)/2=2,556,
Time typing, robots or not, 1/2 chance,
Gold and silver coined drives message.
Poetry may rescue, if lines kept fairly short,
next set the tone, slowly build another part,
for emotions can set the theme to cast net,
fish caught may nibble on advertising bait,
Does each blogger become a throwaway?
Calculate your prophet, include yourself,
time to get off the shelf and on to the table,
conversation with others part of the eating,
never stop competing till confusion triggers,
then starts the desert to sweetly stop hunger.
Best, rm
PS at N=90, L(90)~8100/2=4050 bloggers a gone.
Some came back. Best again
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carsoncitygal on Aug 22, 2009 9:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mr. Bageant, Serious progressives won't have to tolerate Obama or whoever the GOP nominee is by
Posted by: rmuldavin
» THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT: THE REAL HEATHCARE OPTION WILL ONLY COME FROM A POLITICAL ONE
Posted by: ScoobyDoobyDoo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kati on Aug 22, 2009 10:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm also sorry that the Alternet comments/discussions on your article are so off topic... (ideological?)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: drone
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: drone
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: Kati
» RE: Joe Bageant and ideology
Posted by: drone
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Aug 22, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So said Strother Martin who portrayed a sadistic and corrupt prison warden upon the capture and return to the chain gang of Cool Hand Luke (Paul Newman).
Like the warden, the insurance and drug racketeers have distorted the disgraceful facts of their inhumanity and pathological greed by constructing a bizarre "reality" of their own making, and successfully selling it to hysterical twits and racial bigots.
It appears the ONLY solution to any real healthcare reform is going ahead with a more humane program, fools and greedy bastards notwithstanding. If this means slam-dunking it into the faces of neocons and their stooges in congress and the senate, so be it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EJLima on Aug 22, 2009 11:47 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Find it. $$
3. Chase it. $$$
4. Catch it. $$$$
5. Love it. $$$$$
6. Worship it. $$$$$$
7. Become SATAN and lose it and die.
Because they cannot take it with them where they are going and when the next satan wannabees find the evil works they have done worthy their image is stamped and printed on what they worship. Be careful what you worship and wish for.
MATTHEW ch22-v21
ch23-v2....v38
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Aug 22, 2009 12:02 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Aug 22, 2009 2:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cathyc on Aug 22, 2009 3:38 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
------------
LOL! Hey Joe, I read your book "Deerhunting with Jesus". Good read. Americans are fucking crazy... not all, but MOST Americans are!
Bring it on!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anubis12 on Aug 22, 2009 4:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially health care is a topic that gets under my skin because my relatives lost the usual work provided health care, after my stepfather lost his regular job as a journalist and moved into freelancing.
I don't like to preach because American affairs are really none of my business as a German. Still I feel that I need to share the outrage I feel when I see the sort of lies and propaganda that is spread about European health care systems in the media in the US.
Since European models show that public health care works very well and provides a level of freedom to people, that most of the Americans I talked to here in Germany can't even believe, the most reasonable thing to do in this whole debate is to point the finger at our systems and make it known, that they are great.
And compared to other European states Germany doesn't even have an especially good one (public/private mix instead of public only). But still... everyone is insured and is getting treated. No people dumped on the curb here, by hospitals because they don't have insurance.
Recently I watched the Daily Show, where Jon interviewed some politican about health care and said : "I don't get it... there are 50 million uninsured. Let's insure them. How big a bill do you need to do that ?"
That speaks from my heart. Health is a human right, not something to gain from. Anyway... I really hope it's going to happen and I'm glad I could share my thoughts with the Alternet crowd.
Greetings from Germany,
Jan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A comment from the old world
Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: A comment from the old world
Posted by: anubis12
» RE: A comment from the old world
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeanne on Aug 22, 2009 6:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The play is a tragedy or a farce, take your pick. The object is to distract the public with the appearance of an epic battle. But, the outcome is predetermined. The fighter (if I'm allowed to mix metaphors) is supposed to throw the fight in the tenth. The pretense of working with the Republicans, who are playing their walk-on role as the evil villain to perfection (mostly because there isn't any acting involved on their part). The Democrats are well-cast in their weak, ineffectual role as victim.
Just before the curtain falls, Congress will produce the "BILL" the Frankenstein's Monster they've been trying so hard to bring forth. It will have no public option, no single-payer, no assurance of affordability. It will have a mandate that all Americans must buy insurance, and it will ask the insurance industry to "play nice, please." Obama will sign the bill -- his way of draping a sign over it that says, "Reform." Out will come the "Applause" sign. And Congress, the President and the Insurance companies will go to the after-play party, congratulating themselves on their masterful performance.
The American people will be left with the ticket stubs, and the distinct feeling that we've just been had.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's so obvious
Posted by: leafsong1
» Thank you Jeanne. Flawless analysis and smart prediction.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 7:17 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I Am Not Talking Shit Here
I Am Talking Scaffolders
They Build The Infrastructure
Whilst You Cunts Think You Had an EMPIRE
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 7:38 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Do You Mean - We Can't Do That?
We Can Also Grill WAR CRIMINALS Who went along with the easy option to take the money and tell lies - we know who you are - You are Criminals AGAINST HUMANITY
Well We LOVE OUR FRIENDS
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 8:06 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But all I have taken with me is my Beautiful Girlfriend
No Guns, No Bombs
Just Love
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 22, 2009 8:35 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i thought they were neaerly as good as led zeppeolinm
and they keep coming back
now i can't think of a single murican musician in the same league
Neil Young Is a Canadian
And Well...
Ted Nugent is Deaf
The Next President Of America Should Be Lemmy
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You have poor taste in music, Tony. (I'm jokin', Tony)
Posted by: GuitarBill
» ....and that's where he passed out and spilled his drink...
Posted by: leafsong1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goodsensecynic on Aug 23, 2009 7:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, he remains somewhat stuck in the icing atop his description of "Cupcake Land," overly emphasizing "ideology" as ultimately autonomous. He also - presumably in the interest of hyperbole - overstates the case: I am pretty sure, for instance, that insurance company profits do not account for over 30% of health care expenses in the USA (although if you add in redundant insurance company administrative costs and the profits of other private health industries - e.g., pharmaceutical companies - he may not be far off the mark). There are other possible exaggerations. I am (almost) sure that the average American's private insurance company premiums are not more than $13,000 per annum (quite). And so on. Such incidentals detract somewhat from his argument and give his opponents the opportunity to focus on small points while distracting others from the larger ones.
The crucial issues of the false debates, the silliness of the "death panels" (insurance companies dropping people with catastrophic illnesses or denying people with "pre-existing conditions" are surely more mendacious than encouraging psychological counselling for terminal patients and the filing of "living wills"), and all the foaming-at-the-mouth about socialism are among those larger matters.
Constructing a comprehensive critique of the political economy of late capitalism and dissecting the fundamental conspiracy, collusion, connivance, collaboration and community of consciousness (call it what you will) among the RNC, the DNC, President Obama, the corporate media and those who own and control the mode, means and relations of the production and distribution of goods and services provides a pretty good fix on how "the fix is in" (and has been from the outset on health care - to say nothing of education, labour relations, civil rights and criminal justice, environmental sustainability and the rest of the domestic and foreign policy inventory).
All of this would be amusing in a ghoulish sort of way, if it were not for the harm it does to the American people, now propagandized into a kind of Zombie-stupor, and for people like me who live outside the United States and who reasonably fear that this kind of political toxicity could easily spread into an ideological pandemic. It is bad enough that we have to worry about the always ticking population bomb, irrational religious fanatics and so on, but to have the "leader of the free world" (not Mr. Obama himself, but the United States of America) self-immobilized and self-destructive is a damned shame.
What's worse, anyone who has the temerity to take a decent history, to perform an accurate diagnosis and to recommend an appropriate therapy for this imperial sick puppy of technological modernity is rendered immediately eligible for predismissal by American liberals and conservatives alike (and they are fundamentally alike) on the grounds of paranoid delusion.
Now, that is the real Catch-22.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Aug 23, 2009 7:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: Johnny Hempseed
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: So why did American liberals believe Barack Obama would bring home the health care bacon?
Posted by: bigfoot 13ee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 23, 2009 8:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The final hope stated in this excellent article is probably the only one that stands a snowcone's chance in hell of affecting any real change – although when it gets to that point, what change we get will be a roll of the dice. But I'll take what I can get ....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We need another March On Washington –– a REALLY BIG one.
Posted by: Karina
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on Aug 23, 2009 12:54 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of the movie The Matrix. In that movie,humans invent artificially intelligent robots in the lat 21st century, and these robots are treated as slaves. The robots rebel and world war results in which humans loose. The robots decide to hook up humanity to a massive supercomputer called the Matrix, where humans live in a artificial reality were they are happy,oblivious to they fact that they are in prison,basically. A few humans manage to break out from the matrix, and form a resistance that can jack in and out of the matrix at will,and fights the robots inside and outside the matrix. Besides being a badass sci-fi action movie(it was the Matrix that invented bullet time and helped make Japanese anime popular) it was very deep and actually held up a mirror to how the government/media dominants US society.
I suggest everyone who wants to understand how our healthcare debate is screwed up, and what is wrong with America in general and the media in particular, read a book called Idiot America by Charles P Pierce . In it he points out how facts,logic,and truth are no longer important,but emotions(which he calls the GUT)popularity and profit are important. How skill and expertise are seen as weird and dishonest. He examines such things as intelligent design vs. evolution,talk radio,the Terry Schiavo incident and much much more to show us what is wrong with this country. Its a great book for not just understanding our culture,government, and media,but also our American brothers and sisters who live in Idiot America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nike Dunk on Aug 23, 2009 10:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tmgibs on Aug 23, 2009 10:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mtcloud on Aug 24, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
August 20, 2009
I'm getting very upset by what I've been seeing since this health care issue has come to the fore. I'm becoming really angry by how much my intelligence has been insulted. I'm beginning to feel like the man who has to explain to his friends that Criss Angel is not really defying the laws of physics. He's in the business of creating illusions. He does not really float above buildings, pull ladies in half, climb through closed, solid windows without breaking the glass, walk on water, or do any of the things one might see him do. These are illusions. They are parlor tricks. They are elaborate, complicated, well designed, well executed, likely expensive illusions, but they are nothing but illusions nonetheless.
The power elite are also in the business of creating illusions. They use their politicians and the mass media to try to create a perception of reality they would like us to see. The illusions they create are elaborate, complicated, well designed, well executed and likely expensive, but they are illusions nonetheless. The difference between the illusions the power elite create and those of Criss Angel is that Mr. Angel creates his illusions strictly for entertainment purposes, the power elite are creating theirs so that they can control mass consciousness and hence make it easier to control the population in general. The problem for them is that many people are beginning to realize exactly what's been happening.
One of the ways to create a good illusion is to get the audience to look over there while something is happening over here. Another is to keep things hidden and produce them when you want them seen. Still another way is to make the audience believe something isn't what it appears to be, or that something is what it doesn't appear to be. Or any combination of these things can help produce a good illusion. Of course, if the audience looks where the action is and detects the slight of hand, or if they see the hidden element before it is produced, or if they are not convinced that something is or is not something else, then the illusion is ruined.
There was a man in New Hampshire recently who came to a protest against the proposed health care legislation open carrying a gun. His name was Mr. William Kostric. He was also carrying a sign that read "It is time to water the tree of liberty." This protest was near where Mr. Barack Obama was having a town hall meeting. What's wrong with that? We have a God given right of self defense, don't we? The second amendment of our nation's constitution still applies, right? Holding a sign at a protest is legal, so no big deal, right? Open carrying in New Hampshire is legal, so no big deal, right? Wrong. The media jumped all over it. They made it a big deal.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billybookworm on Aug 24, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Death panels? Every insurance company has these, they are called actuaries and underwriters.
At least the Mafia has a code that discourages the killing of innocents.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Aug 24, 2009 5:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Problems:
1. Doctors have to pay high premiums for malpractice insurance and of course this is ultimately paid for by the patients.
2. Doctors often have to practice "defensive medicine" to protect themselves from possible frivolous law suits. The means doing unnecessary testing on patients so as to establish a baseline health profile, thus increasing costs.
Some Solutions:
Insurance companies should band together to share the cost of covering individuals with pre-existing conditions
More people will be able to afford health insurance if premiums are tax deductible.
Insurance companies charge employers 15 percent to 25 percent in overhead expenses for every prepaid health care dollar. The patient's $20 co-pay for a $100 service requires $115 to $125 in premiums even though the doctor receives only $100. So why not pay the $100 directly using pretax dollars? Flexible spending accounts, health reimbursement arrangements and health savings accounts are growing in popularity since they allow pretax payment of personal medical bills.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: assss on Aug 25, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
juicy couture charms
juicy couture jewelry
juicy couture charms
juicy couture charms
juicy couture jewelry
juicy jewelry
juicy charms
juicy charms
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Aug 26, 2009 12:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ElMikeo on Aug 26, 2009 9:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mike- Life Insurance
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lee123 on Aug 27, 2009 1:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ethrop on Aug 27, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtpatrick108 on Aug 27, 2009 5:38 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 2snak on Aug 29, 2009 6:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has to be some common sense rationing. But who wants anyone to decide that for them?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Sep 3, 2009 10:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Could Your Cell Phone End Up Killing You?
The Overuse of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed Is Killing Us
One of the Most Common Chemicals Used in Modern Life Is Now Being Seen as a Health Threat




