COMMENTS: 160
We've Been Trapped Inside a Bad Health Care System So Long, We Don't Even Know How Much We're Missing
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.
- How would your life be different if you never had to worry about getting, keeping, or affording health care again?
- What other choices might you have made?
- Where else would you be right now?
- How would it change your plans for the future?
Sometimes, when you're up to your chin in alligators, it's hard to focus on the fact that there's a big, broad, alligator-free world waiting somewhere out there, beyond the edge of the swamp.
In this case, it's hard for most Americans to even imagine that nobody in the rest of the developed world lives this way. We've been living inside the restrictions and making the trade-offs required to hang onto our all-important health care coverage for so long that we don't even realize that we're cutting those deals, or what we're giving up, or how thoroughly those choices have come to dominate and limit our lives.
If you're an American under 40, you can't remember a time that the health care system didn't work this way -- or that keeping coverage wasn't a dominant factor in making your life choices. If you're older than that, the memory of another, happier era beyond the swamp is dim, and fading fast.
This was one of the things that struck me hardest when I arrived in Canada five years ago. The swamp-blindness was so dark and deep that it took a while to adjust to a world without alligators. It's almost impossible to describe to folks back home how different life is when health insurance simply doesn't factor at all into how you choose to live your life. There's almost no language for it. Rather than even attempt it, I sometimes just ask my American friends and relatives to open up their imaginations, and answer the question for themselves:
I've seen people reduced to tears of rage and frustration by these questions. When you really stop and think about it -- pause for a few minutes to take it all in, past, present, and future -- it becomes clear that the full absurdity and the sheer enormity of the sacrifices we have to make for an almighty health care card are the greatest obstacle to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that most of us are burdened with today.
Polls say most Americans who have health care are satisfied with it. But nobody ever asks them if they're satisfied with what they've had to do to get it, keep it, or afford it.
What would you do differently? I watch my Canadian neighbors live their lives, and the world beyond the swamp comes into sharp and stunning focus.
My neighbors go to the doctor when they need to -- and often, when they don't. If they're just feeling funky for a day or two, they go. If the splinter is too big to handle with a needle, they go. Anything goes a little bit sideways -- they go.
By American standards, they're probably overusing the system. (My husband once asked an employee who was nursing a cough, "Have you seen a doctor about that?" The guy just looked at him, confused. Of course he'd seen a doctor. Up here, only an American would ask such a stupid question.)
But the upshot is that the small symptoms of really big things -- little lumps, creeping blood pressure, wounds that don't heal right, coughs that don't go away -- are caught and diagnosed early in a GP's office, instead of months or years down the road in a full-blown crisis at the ER, which is now the American way. And this is central to cost containment: getting emergent problems calmly headed off right away in a $30 office visit is a lot more cost-effective than having to deal with the full catastrophe later on in a $3,000 emergency-room drama scene. And it allows people to maintain their good health through the years, instead of delaying treatment until it's too late to recover it and permanent damage is done.
My neighbors heal, recover, and go on with their lives. The U.S. disability rate last year was 19.1 percent, and rising fast. In Canada, it's 14.3 percent -- and Statistics Canada believes that the only reason their stats are creeping up these days is that people who once hid their disabilities are now more willing to admit them.
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 26, 2009 12:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No policy positions? No Names? No Way !!!!
We need Single Payer HR 676 no doubt but signing on to an organization that doesn't have their policy positions stated sounds fishy to me ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The current system has robbed us of.....
Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Also my life, my retirement, and my marriage.
Posted by: sasquuatch55
» Single Payer Action is real and credible
Posted by: james108
» RE: Great Post ... But No Policy Positions ...
Posted by: james108
Comments are closed-
Posted by: victoriahokulani on Jun 26, 2009 1:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: Annarisse
» I disagree...
Posted by: CatDad
» You're right: there are no individual solutions
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: MarkinBoston
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: hagwind
» The higher tax would be offset by not having a deductible
Posted by: harpy
» Here's a new take on this...
Posted by: buffeliscious
» So if you break your leg, how is eating healthy going to fix that?
Posted by: harpy
» RE:Well luckly little you!...
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: radicalchic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: heid on Jun 26, 2009 3:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With due respect to those doctors whose first concern is their patients, too many are more concerned with money. The result is refusing to see patients without insurance. It's not taking the time to do research when a patient comes in with something not well understood. It's doing assembly-line surgeries - a very common practice now. It's pushing drugs that result in more money in their pockets, without regard to potential effects on patients. It's pushing unneeded tests.
Even this article doesn't see the depths of the problem. It assumes that everything the med system does is necessarily to the benefit of people, and that it's only the lack of medical care that's a disaster. Unfortunately, this isn't always true. People suffer from both not receiving and from receiving medical care.
Many of us believe that more harm than good is done by modern medicine. That doesn't detract from the good, but for those who've been harmed, the idea of it being necessarily for people's benefit is laughable.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another factor to consider.
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Another factor to consider.
Posted by: racetoinfinity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 26, 2009 3:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But for most of us (the insured) we have been both duped and swindled by greedy interests. Some of them should go to jail.
Time and $ have run out.
We will see long overdue US health care reform in 2009 and it will include a public health care option.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Jun 26, 2009 3:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Less money for retirement
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Less money for retirement
Posted by: anneliese-nyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jun 26, 2009 3:46 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
question... how does the canadian system pay for itself??? what is the overall tax rate for an average family today if it is from payroll deductions, or think I remember being told somewhere along the line it was paid for by an end use sales tax on most everything...
might seem silly to ask at this stage of the game, but just can't remember right now... someone jump in here please???
back to coffee...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: the canadian system...
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: the Canadian system...
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: the Canadian system...
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: the Canadian system...
Posted by: Annarisse
» Not Much Difference
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Not Much Difference
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: Not Much Difference
Posted by: donl51
» Here's an article about it at
Posted by: harpy
» How the canadian system pays for itself.
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annarisse on Jun 26, 2009 3:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm in Canada, so:
1) When I asked to see a specialist, it took a couple of weeks to get me an appointment - but once I did, I was booked for a simple surgery that works about 80% of the time within a couple of weeks.
2) Meanwhile, I was off sick from work, using my work-based benefits to take the time I needed to get my iron levels up higher.
3) When the low ferratin resulted in depression (a common but little-known side effect) I took up nearly an hour of a doctor's time explaining how overwhelmed I was, and getting help in the form of counseling while still working on the ferratin levels. No meds were pushed on me for the depression.
4) When the first surgery caused a complication that had me back in the emergency room a few months later, I was on the table for surgery within six hours. A few months later, the problem was permanently fixed with a much bigger surgery. (This is a surgery that is hard for a young woman to get in the States, because the doctors worry that a woman might change her mind about permanently giving up her fertility. Many women in their early thirties can't find a doctor who will do it. When I said I wanted it, my doctor switched from "options" to "explanations of the procedure" without blinking an eyelash - because I wouldn't be able to sue him if my only problem was that I changed my mind, anyway.)
5) Through all of this, my total expenditures have been only a few hundred dollars - for iron pills, for other supplies related to my illness, and for parking at the hospital. That's it. I have no remaining sick time, but I didn't have any unpaid days, I didn't lose my job, and there was not one single co-pay in sight.
6) My return to health is being monitored by my GP, with the help of a nutritionist, because my underlying condition is likely to lead to type II diabetes if I don't get on top of that now, and I'd like to hold that off as long as I can.
Meanwhile, I had a friend in the States going through a very similar medical story. It took her a year longer, two doctors who turned her down, losing her job and nearly her house, and a thousand dollars in co-pays. Now, her insurance won't pay for the nutritionist who could help her manage her condition so she doesn't get Type II diabetes.
So who got the better service? Yes, I had a couple of waits of a few weeks, and had to wait two months for my surgery - which gave me time to prepare to be off work and be really certain I wanted it. But all told, I got the care I needed. My American friend did not, and she paid more for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Maybe if american tax dollars...
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: Getting sick, then better, in Canada
Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Getting sick, then better, in Canada
Posted by: Annarisse
» I had to wait 3 months for a specialist here in the US
Posted by: harpy
» RE: Getting sick, then better, in Canada
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kegbot1 on Jun 26, 2009 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sara you lay out the case well and I have noticed the differences. When I visit Toronto and see where my friends work I am struck by the way the workplace is so much more relaxed than ours. People in Canada are generally treated like human beings on their job, not like serfs.
Speaking of small business, I've been running one for two years without health insurance. when it comes up I tell my customers (in this very red county) that one accident, one invasive procedure, one serious illness and the business they love so much is gone, gone, gone. Many of them, however, are imbued with the stupid Puritanism that had not poisoned Canada - they fervently believe if you can't afford health insurance, you probably don't deserve it.
Now I have health insurance thanks to Cleveland's domestic partnership program and the fact that my SO works for (shudder) JP Morgan/Chase which offers the benefits to one domestic partner. I had to move into Cleveland for it and away from my mother's house where I had been caring for her and her numerous maladies. If it weren't for Medicare she would have been dead years ago or locked in a nursing home. But you do what you have to do down here. I've told people when I didn't have insurance that if I had a heart attack, I'd rather die on the way to the hospital than spend the rest of my life trying to pay medical bills no honest man could pay.
But Sara, it's not going to happen. We now live in a country totally dominated by business interests and their bought and paid for Congress who could care less what we want. There's a lot of war material to spend money on to defend us from the latest bogeyman. In my youth it was the Godless Commies, now it's the Godless Islamists. Funny that. In the meantime a system that one would have expected to see in Dickensian Britain is now accepted as the standard for America.
And when you get down to the core of why the American people accept this it comes down to: the 'haves' have been scared by the industry and the cons to believe they will 'lose' what they have AND that medical care and their taxes (the ones not now spent on war) will go to the stereotypical 'welfare mothers' (read: minority) who don't 'deserve' it.
It's a sad, sad situation and I don't see any improvement in this culture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, kegbot1, I know, I know . . .
Posted by: hagwind
» I talk to everyone I can
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: I talk to everyone I can
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: I've heard the same thing...
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jun 26, 2009 4:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.health-care-reform.net/causedeath.htm
The situation has almost certainly got worse since then.
Whilst in the UK, the National Health Service has deteriotated considerably since it was started after WWII (when the UK was in a state of almost complete bankruptcy), the NHS is still functional.
Anyone in the UK can see a Doctor or go to Hospital and receive immediate treatment which is usually of a very high standard for FREE.
Of course the system isn't perfect, but it is there for everyone.
Similar care is available throughout much of Europe.
However, the UK system is being corrupted by US influence - particularly with Doctors vastly over-precribing drugs.
The major problem with health is caused by poor diet and lifestyle. Whilst drugs can mask symptoms - for example they can lower blood pressure and cholesterol, they cannot resolve the root cause of bad health. There is a great deal of evidence that long term use of an enormous range of drugs cause significant harm. The side effects then tend to be treated with other drugs. People think they are receiving good health care - when in reality their body is being poisoned for the benefit of Drug Company Profits.
Drugs are of course useful - particularly on a short term basis - and can save lives for certain specific diseases.
But the real life saver is not to get ill in the first place. That can be achieved by a healthy diverse diet using natural foods that have not been processed, together with taking at least a reasonable amount of exercise.
Stress is a natural and normal part of life, but the body is designed to overcome the symptoms of stress by vigorous exercise (fight or flight scenario). But the modern world results in stress build up, that tends not to be released by exercise - but masked by drugs or alcohol.
It is an exceedingly good idea, to not take any form of drugs or alcohol for several days a week - and instead go for a long cycle ride and enjoy the natural dopamine released by the body as a result of the vigourous exercise.
Sure you might fall off your bike and kill yourself - but on the other hand - the exercise might keep you alive and healthy for another 30-40 years.
RIP Michael Jackson. I suspect what really killed him was doing relatively nothing for over 10 years - and then doing far too much in a short space of time to prepare for a most Gruelling schedule of doing 50 shows in London at the O2 arena.
He should have ramped up very gradually. A 50 year old man - cannot suddenly become a young athlete again - if he has taken 10 years off.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health Care is the US is one of the Greatest Causes of Death
Posted by: dogdiva
» So it is Being Reported in The UK that Michael Jackson's Doctor Has Dun a Runner
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Health Care is the US is one of the Greatest Causes of Death
Posted by: sandy55
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grmartin on Jun 26, 2009 4:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Even then it costs less than half of the U.S.
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Canadian system is not cheap
Posted by: Steppin Razor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: matty848 on Jun 26, 2009 5:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-Matt
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What did I give up?
Posted by: red godowar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jun 26, 2009 5:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is way out of proportion.Dentists are the true ruling elite and the worst rip off artists of the century.Their cost structure is pre -medicare era.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BA
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: BA
Posted by: walldodger1969
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Freticat on Jun 26, 2009 6:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am on Medicare, but the annual deductible is higher than my monthly income. Typically, on my first doctor visit of the year, I get billed for a lump sum that is more than I can afford to pay (it's either that or forgo food, utilities and hope my landlord understands when I can't pay my full month's rent). Thus, I either put off seeing the doctor as long as possible or end up ducking collection calls for months on end (thank the gods for caller ID!).
Last year, a cat who had been part of my life for nineteen years got a serious infection at the same time I got quite sick. I could pay a vet bill or a doctor bill but not both. I chose to spend the money on my cat and weather my own illness without help. Here's what made the difference: my vet let me pay in installments that I could afford; my doctor's office, a large clinic attached to a local hospital, would not.
The cat died; I ended up not seeing my doctor for another six months, when my escalating complaints finally became too uncomfortable to ignore.
That's no way to live.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No More Doctor-Businessmen
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: No More Doctor-Businessmen
Posted by: Freticat
» RE: "no physician should be rich from medical practice"
Posted by: kettleblack
» Shzaam!
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» Simple answers are often wrong.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» the right simple answer is what we want
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: the right simple answer is what we want
Posted by: wtfo
» I agree - let's not punish the docs.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» The right simple answer is single payer
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Simple answers are often wrong.
Posted by: Annarisse
» Many Veterinarians are becoming extremely profit oriented
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Many Veterinarians are becoming extremely profit oriented
Posted by: maglindracia
» RE: Last Year I Had A Choice
Posted by: anneliese-nyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Jun 26, 2009 6:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plan A costs nothing monthly out of the SS check BUT when they are admitted to the hospital the cost up front is about $1,000.
Thr Government Plan for the elderly, Medicare is NOT FREE.
I see a lot of 3rd world people on TV that actually look healthier than our citizens. Our elected leaders are living in a fantasy world, and are DRUNK on taxpayer $$$ and the perks offered by corrupt lobbyist policies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: lderly on Medicare PAY Dearly with funds they may not have OR...
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: elderly on Medicare PAY Dearly with funds they may not have OR...
Posted by: picket
» Very simple: Listen
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Very simple: Listen
Posted by: picket
» We Agree!
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: lderly on Medicare PAY Dearly with funds they may not have OR...
Posted by: Annarisse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 26, 2009 6:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all of the bs talk about "free choice" and "competition" - please tell me what about a single payer option will not force the Industry to change their behavior toward those they continue to rip off with high premium payments, denial of care coverage, and double speak?!? You better believe that if Congress got treated the same as the "average American" with coverage - they would change their position quickly! Those obstructionist Congresspersons - need to feel the heat from their constituents whether you have insurance or not! Call, fax, email - tell them to get off their ever so cushioned butts and finally do what is right for the nation - not the corporations!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's sick ... that Congress gets Single Payer Health Care
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 26, 2009 6:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I finally got a job that provided health insurance, paying $180/mo for my premiums when I started. After the premiums doubled, my company could no longer afford to pay. They gave me a raise and said it was up to me to pay my own insurance from then on. I have no health issues and on no medications, my premiums went up to $400/mo, then $500/mo. within one year. They recently wanted an increase to $600/mo so I had to up double my deductible to keep my payments at $500. I am sure it will go up by next year. I haven't gotten a pay raise since Bush was selected president and there's no raise on the horizon in this economy.
My (first and only) new car, back in 2001 only cost $320/mo. If I add my homeowners insurance, flood insurance, windstorm insurance, auto insurance (including uninsured motorist insurance), THE BULK OF MY PAYCHECK GOES TO THE INSURANCE RACKET! All with deductibles and deniables! (And they always turn to the tax payers for bailouts during a crisis.)
I AM MAD AS HELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!
Sushi
"There are more important things in life than money...but they all cost money. "
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: $500/month and rising
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 26, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carrotwax on Jun 26, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course that's true. But it's also true that a family might pay $5000 more in taxes and save $10000 a year in other health care costs they would have otherwise paid. Or the employer would save that $10000, which could then be negotiated into having higher wages.
I'm an American also living in Canada, and it's all true. This last year I've had a serious illness, seen a whole bunch of specialists, had tests, and haven't paid. Doctors also love it because they get to focus on the actual medicine which is why they got into it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Taxes are a phony issue
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Well put Foon, we already
Posted by: marid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thekidde on Jun 26, 2009 7:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this a great country I fought for, or what. Fuck the bankers and Wall Streeters. Perhaps we'll meet in the street soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If it weren't for the costs of health care...
Posted by: Sushi
» VA charges?
Posted by: johnwinthrop
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AAWeeble3 on Jun 26, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Absolute Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Troll Alert. Do not click on link
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnnydajogger on Jun 26, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If it weren't for premiums...
Posted by: Sushi
» Odd.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: education
Posted by: lfish
» education starts when the instution starts to teach
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 26, 2009 7:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, would my employer really pay me another ~$7,000 if they weren't subsidizing my health care? Or would FEMACare care simply take that money from my employer AND me via a taxes, and then deliver me something that might hopefully approach the care I already enjoy?
A "public option" (great frame, by the way, reminiscent of "No Child Left Behind") would be fine, as long as it was paid for by the folks it covered. You know--if the public really did have an option as to both enrolling and paying for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Maybe yes, maybe no
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: "...the care you already enjoy"?
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tmgibs on Jun 26, 2009 7:45 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh well, as long as I get to go on an international vacation every year and manage my investments why should I worry about that. (I can always go to the US and pay for it since I always go on international vacations and have investments).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» WTF?
Posted by: Annarisse
» Translation
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» Elegant Summation of Conservative Attitude Toward Healthcare
Posted by: iolanthe
» RE: Disinformation and lies
Posted by: Bloomer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adorabelledearheart on Jun 26, 2009 8:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching this family have a medical crisis in their chief breadwinner without it becoming a financial disaster was enlightening and transformative. Folks, we don't have to live this way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sableskin on Jun 26, 2009 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in excellent health, with no dependents. I can only imagine what those add-on would be. I have colleagues who are either married, and use 1 spouse to cover the entire family, or colleauges who use one person to cover an entire extended family, including children. If the second scenario was ever caught, there would be dire consequences, but this is more common than one might think. I don't for a minute underestimate how lucky I am, and thank goodness I have never had any major medical emergencies. For a single person, I spend THROUGH THE ROOF to buy food of the best quality that I can (GOOD LUCK)and spend dearly to keep my pets in good health. As I get older, the body requires more (nature of the beast), and I will probably not leave Federal service to keep the health care. In the end, however, when I see my paycheck, and the amount of money that goes to healthcare ALONE, I can only be glad that I can afford it, because it certainly doesn't seem worth it. I would LOVE to be able to share it with someone who couldn't afford any, but without dependents or fraud, that cannot happen. Healthcare in thois country is but one wasted resource, but I am terrified to be without it.
I realize that this particular demographic may not seem worthy of sympathy, but when you ask what I’ve given up, I can tell you. I don’t have kids, and probably won’t because the idea of being single and trying to negotiate the health system with a healthy one or two is mindboggling. Its not just direct health care, it’s the childcare, the childhood injuries, my illnesses, their illnesses. Healthcare actually responds to overall well-being, and in the case of children that is everything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kettleblack on Jun 26, 2009 8:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The conservatives gotta love that!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Talk about a union buster!...uh, no
Posted by: CLaudLaw
» RE: Talk about a union buster!
Posted by: Annarisse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wtfo on Jun 26, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I simply cannot seem to get my mind around what changed over the last 20+ years but SOMETHING has changed drastically. In my childhood days, my parents never seemed to have to make the heart-rending decisions on whether to eat, pay the mortgage, pay the utility bills, etc. vs. pay for any healthcare issues for the family.
My parents were not rich by any stretch of the imagination. However, they somehow managed to raise us just fine and we were always taken care of whenever we became seriously sick, injured, or needed medical attention. I don't remember if my father always had health insurance provided by his employers but he changed jobs quite a bit and we always seemed to have affordable access to health care whenever we needed it.
What changed? Now, my mother is terrified about healthcare - and she is covered by Medicare. Myself and my children are paying a very large percentage of their income for health insurance if we can even find or hold it - and my children are very healthy and have never been hospitalized since being out on their own!
It seems to me that our entire nation is transfixed by a palpable fear about continued access to affordable healthcare. Concern over this issue is practically running our lives now and consuming ever greater percentages of everybody's incomes. All indications are that the problem will get much worse before it gets better - if that ever happens at all in my lifetime.
Unless we as a country finally decide to do something permanent about this problem, it will continue to grow and may eventually consume us. The arguments about how to pay for it are pretty much smoke screens because it should by now seem obvious that we have no other option than to FIND A WAY TO PAY FOR IT SOMEHOW! We have no alternative. It is not moral for a nation to ration something as necessary as healthcare based solely on ability to pay. If you do this you are essentially saying that "If you need somebody to treat you medically and you cannot pay for it upfront, then I guess you just should crawl off somewhere (preferably out of my sight) and die". My heart bleeds for you but, you see, I have to look out for MY health and the health of MY loved ones and "you are on your own"!
This sort of philosophy is not something a country should be proud of IMHO. But apparently, it is the current price of being American and part of "the great experiment in free-market capitalism". However, looking back again - I don't remember my parents agreeing to this philosophy...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Looking back...
Posted by: CLaudLaw
» RE: Looking back...
Posted by: wtfo
» You nailed it
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: You nailed it
Posted by: wtfo
» I would suggest another strategy
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 26, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 26, 2009 11:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If my cancer returns, I'm dead. No one will treat cancer without insurance. Period. And no one who has had cancer and then lost insurance can get coverage for cancer again.
The American people are giving up more than ever to keep this broken system. Their system has deemed me not "worthy" of big expenditures, not important enough to save if I get sick again. Well, guess what? I deem this fucked-up system too broken to warrant saving!
Single payer for ALL. It's the only humane way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Essentially, you've been 'triaged'
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: ssentially, you've been 'triaged'
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: You are not disposable
Posted by: paradigm2009
» RE: What have I given up?
Posted by: paradigm2009
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frankly1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The USA has government of/for/by the people, but not Canada
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jun 26, 2009 11:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FUCKING DOCTORS
"Police ‘searching for Jackson’s doctor’
Staff Reporter Published:Jun 26, 2009
LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles police were reported to be searching for Michael Jackson’s personal doctor to question him over allegations that the star received a potentially fatal dose of the painkiller Demerol before his death yesterday afternoon"
People are Going To Get ANGRY
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And Neil Young Is Singing Live at Glastonbury - Broadcast on BBC - THE NEEDLE AND THE DAMAGE DONE
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jun 26, 2009 12:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My premiums are only a little over $130 a month, but that doesn't include dental or eye glasses. I also have copays and have to pick up the tab for whatever the insurance company refuses to pay. When I count up all the little costs, it's a whole lot more than I'd pay in a tax increase for single payer. Even so, it's a bargain compared to most people's insurance. And I haven't had any major illnesses, either.
I have a friend who is dying of cancer. I went to visit him after he came home from Duke where he underwent an innovative treatment that did not help him. His wife related some of the hassles she encountered while dealing with the insurance companies, and I offered my opinion that we need single payer health insurance like every other industrialized country. My friend said he disagreed, that it would entail yet another layer of government bureaucracy. Because he is so frail (and in spite of the fact that he, in his better days would have loved a lively argument about this), I didn't say, "Oh, like the bureaucracy we have to wade through to send our kids to school, get firefighters to come to our homes, or call 911 for help." And I didn't say that at least we wouldn't, as he is doing, leave our spouses in debt - in spite of having insurance.
It's amazing how steeped in misinformation people are. Yes, I am sure that there are Canadians who have serious reservations about their system, and I did read the post by one of them here. Perhaps people in Canada do die from lack of care, but it's far fewer than it is here, and they don't die from exposure to the elements after going bankrupt and becoming homeless.
I know at least two people who have declared bankruptcy due to medical bills. I know some who had to get jobs working for someone else rather than maintain their own businesses because of medical insurance costs. I have co-workers who are in debt because of medical problems that were not completely covered by their insurance. I have family and friends who can't afford insurance and live from day to day worrying about what will happen if they get sick or hurt.
It's easy for people who are healthy to say all we need to do is eat well and get exercise and then we won't need insurance, as some posters to this article have done. But what about people - like at least two of my friends - who got rear-ended by another driver and wound up with serious injuries. Of course, these should have been taken care of with the auto insurance, but one of them was hit by an uninsured driver, and my friend was told he'd have to sue his own insurance company to get the payments from his uninsured motorists coverage.
Anyone out there who doesn't despise insurance companies? There may be some, but I don't know anyone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» its not misinformation, its brainwashing
Posted by: kegbot1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jun 26, 2009 1:20 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Working with the poor in third world areas I see healthy happy people who eat beans, rice, fresh fruits and teas. None of the hamburgers, huge pizzas, high corn syrup beverages. Even 'health foods' have labels that we need to read, since big corporations will show whole grains and dried fruits on the packaging and people assume the item is 'healthy'. But look closer and the item is loaded with fat and corn sweeteners. Another thing that bugs me is items that say 'less fat'. 'low fat', and people assume the item is healthier and that they can eat more. But read the label and its high in calories. And not at all healthy.
And what about issues like drug and alcohol. These demand huge amounts of money to treat. Yet, we see little being done to keep people from ever trying them. We live in a 'me' society where people demand they be allowed to be FREE. Yet when their freedom becomes an addiction they want someone else to bail them out. Same with people who refuse to be physically active, eat wise, get enough sleep and other preventative measures.
As for issues like broken bones etc. How many people have a walk in closet full of clothes that when added up to a value of 10k? How many people spend $5 a day at Starbucks? That's $150 per month that could be put toward an affordable health care policy for issues like broken bones. Personally I don't like or do fast food. But when I see people in cars lined up at McDonalds day after day, spending an average of $10 I figure that would be better spent on a healthcare plan. Not to mention eating junk means poor health. So its a double whammy.
Now I would like to know how do we afford a government healthcare for everyone whose lifestyle choices are causing the majority of problems? Unless you plug the leaks all we will have is a major gusher later on.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lifestyle changes bring down health costs
Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Lifestyle changes bring down health costs
Posted by: wtfo
» RE: Lifestyle changes bring down health costs
Posted by: paradigm2009
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 26, 2009 1:44 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 26, 2009 1:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grindermonkey on Jun 26, 2009 2:46 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep the blinds drawn.
He is the Antichrist, a shadow on the sun.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: liblady2008 on Jun 26, 2009 3:48 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not surprisingly none of that is going to happen amy time soon. Bill Maher summed up why last Friday in his "New Rules" segment. In a nutshell the people are moving left of center left while the democrats are now right of center (the new republicans) and the republicans are way, way right of that these days - and prone to blatant lying.
To get anything major done for the common good st this juncture will take massive civil protests and unrest. Until that happens we will find ourselves in an increasingly Orwellian world - and the only western country, as far as I can tell, where one can go bankrupt because they had the nerve to get cancer or have a stroke.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: deang on Jun 26, 2009 3:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if you go to France of Cuba or Nicaragua or Venezuela, residents can't even comprehend the US phenomenon of not taking vacation time at all in order to stay on your employer's good side, something common in the US.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daidactic on Jun 26, 2009 4:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it was sobering for me to read this article.
It comes down to a fundamental question - what is the point of the USA as a state?
It appears to be to make war and support the wealthy but until you understand that Americans should be able to run the state ( only joing!) You are stuck with state you are in. Free health care for all, as I can expect in the UK, requires that the state picks up the tab.
So what is the USA for? Why does it exist if it cannot prouide what you need?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health care and the USA
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Jun 26, 2009 5:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about that, and would rather fix the system by purging it of all democrats and republicans and other lying, elite fascists.
Either way, I'm sick of the feds taking something like 4x what the state gets, and doling out tiny pieces of it back with strings attached, all so they can use our taxes to force us to support mass murder, oppression and the slicing out the world for large multinational corporations.
I can't call anyone crazy for wanting out of that. I'd call some people crazy for being complacent with supporting it.
Even though single payer would save people money, I'm still for saving at least 300 Billion/year from the defense budget. I'm kinda thinking if we invade less countries and wage less psychological and covert insurgent campaigns domestically and abroad, our need for spending more than we have and as much as the rest of the world combined may diminish some.
Maybe we can take some money from the war on drugs and get some tax dollars instead of making criminals and convects of non-violent people who just want to chill.
Maybe we can save some money by not opening a whole new division of the FTC to track things bloggers say online. If it's anything like Obama's campaign "truth squads", they'll just use it as an excuse to stifle people from mentioning things he doesn't like but his people get a license to BS. Yeah, I don't want to pay more for that either.
Will that cover it? Oops, single payer would save money on essentials, and bring down the costs of voluntary services. Never mind.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: silver flute on Jun 26, 2009 6:58 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that once you passed the unbelievablly high hurdles of getting your Social Security Disability, and after the lawyers took 25% of your back SSDI payments, you could count on health care. If your health is that bad then you need medical care, right?
This isn't a choice any person I know would make, it's not like going on vacation or frittering your moeny away.....it's your luck of the draw to have a genetic illness, although we, as a Nation could change how toxic things are, if the Feds wanted to.
Well, that also means you have Medicare at an early age, and at first that was like the prime insurance because the Feds paid the bill. Not any more..... In fact, I have likened it to being in some type of "health care death camp" for disabled and elderly.
My story gets worse each year, and I am not even 60 yrs. old.....plus the Feds are telling me that this insurance is going broke and I'll be uninsurable, too.
I also get Medicaid as I am living on so little, and that pays for the premiums. Now, I get billed for part of those, pay co-pays for meds, pay for deductibles at the ER, can't find any doctor in my state to even take Medicare, and I can't get the doctors who are familiar with my illness AT ALL! So, I fly on donated air miles to Washington state from Alaska for a doctor, air ship my medicine that I need and pray I don't need to go to the ER while I am filing bankruptcy (having borrowed the money for that from my 81-yr. old parents)and filing paperwork to have the money I owe at the hospital written off. What?!?!?!?!
I have been put on a protocol of treatment that uses high, high doses of vitamins and minerals and other natural things that my body has used up or didn't have, for my illness, that is compounded by a registered pharmacy and prescribed by a specialist, but is not covered by Medicare part D because there is a law that forbids Medicare from paying for vitamins and mineral therapy....you see this isn't pharmaceuticals! This would include vitamins for scurvy and rickets, too! My treatment costs me over 75% of my disability income each month! Now, it seems to me that when I have to petition Congress to have my medicine paid for to get well, while I am fully insured, that we have more than one health care problem. They are named INSURANCE COMPANIES, BIG PHARMA AND EACH AND EVERY ONE OF OUR CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATES. I had hoped that Obama would use his power as Pres to get this fixed, but now I think I had better get my affairs in order.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: living on Medicare is sending me into bankrutpcy
Posted by: wtfo
» I'm sorry
Posted by: james108
» RE: living on Medicare is sending me into bankrutpcy
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robert56 on Jun 26, 2009 10:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You guys are being ripped off something awful.
I strongly suggest you investigate our system and agitate with you local politicians to try to get some sort of similar system in America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why are you Americans paying so much for health care?
Posted by: snax
» RE: Why are you Americans paying so much for health care?
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snax on Jun 27, 2009 8:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really want to go out on my own and start a business, but there is simply no way we could afford health insurance with my spouses pre-existing condition. The Republicans like to talk about protecting and fostering a free market, but by propping up these 7 mega-conglomerate health insurance companies, they are really hell bent on quashing entrepreneurs.
It's either raw greed, insanity, or flat out stupidity that keeps the Republicans towing the same tired line. And when it comes to the voters, I have a hard time believing it goes much beyond the last option.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JSquercia on Jun 27, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to love these guys they are calling their Group GOP Caucus for Fairness . That's RIGHT the same people who are afraid the FCC may reinstate the Fairness Doctrine are complaining about Fairness .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 1cclady on Jun 27, 2009 9:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Leakman on Jun 28, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: revjmike on Jun 29, 2009 8:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fortunately we do have some social insurance for disabled folk, so my wife, who had a stroke, is covered by Medicaid due to blindness and our VERY, VERY low income. (This from someone with a Masters Degree and a Bachelors in Medical Technology.
After reading what you've said it is even tempting to move to Canada. I can't, so I'll continue to work for health care reform.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jul 1, 2009 8:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about a list of the costs to a patient to have the inefficient fed gov-meant gumming up the works? We all know anything the gov-meant starts costs 3-5x what they always say to sell it to you socialist suckas.
Try making sense just once..oooo, you can't...liberals are Oz landers basing everything on feelings and others taxes...please don't pretend you have a clue...or that facts matter to you...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: At the end of the day...
Posted by: wtfo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JS99 on Jul 3, 2009 6:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in Ireland the healthcare system is straining to breaking at the moment but from my own personal experience I pay 800euro($1120) per year for Health Insurance for myself and my daughter. I recently had to go to hospital and have a colonoscopy and endoscopy performed. Total cost to me 250euro($350) including GP, Consultant and 6 week course of medicine. Total waiting time 2 weeks, after the initial GP visit had a consultant visit within 4 days and then procedure 1.5 weeks later.
The Irish system is far from perfect but I would not be able to afford to be sick if I lived in the USA and would probably end up being one of the 22000
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 26, 2009 12:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No policy positions? No Names? No Way !!!!
We need Single Payer HR 676 no doubt but signing on to an organization that doesn't have their policy positions stated sounds fishy to me ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The current system has robbed us of.....
Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Also my life, my retirement, and my marriage.
Posted by: sasquuatch55
» Single Payer Action is real and credible
Posted by: james108
» RE: Great Post ... But No Policy Positions ...
Posted by: james108
Comments are closed-
Posted by: victoriahokulani on Jun 26, 2009 1:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: Annarisse
» I disagree...
Posted by: CatDad
» You're right: there are no individual solutions
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: MarkinBoston
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: hagwind
» The higher tax would be offset by not having a deductible
Posted by: harpy
» Here's a new take on this...
Posted by: buffeliscious
» So if you break your leg, how is eating healthy going to fix that?
Posted by: harpy
» RE:Well luckly little you!...
Posted by: donl51
» RE: Health Insurance does not make you healthy or wealthy
Posted by: radicalchic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: heid on Jun 26, 2009 3:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With due respect to those doctors whose first concern is their patients, too many are more concerned with money. The result is refusing to see patients without insurance. It's not taking the time to do research when a patient comes in with something not well understood. It's doing assembly-line surgeries - a very common practice now. It's pushing drugs that result in more money in their pockets, without regard to potential effects on patients. It's pushing unneeded tests.
Even this article doesn't see the depths of the problem. It assumes that everything the med system does is necessarily to the benefit of people, and that it's only the lack of medical care that's a disaster. Unfortunately, this isn't always true. People suffer from both not receiving and from receiving medical care.
Many of us believe that more harm than good is done by modern medicine. That doesn't detract from the good, but for those who've been harmed, the idea of it being necessarily for people's benefit is laughable.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another factor to consider.
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Another factor to consider.
Posted by: racetoinfinity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 26, 2009 3:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But for most of us (the insured) we have been both duped and swindled by greedy interests. Some of them should go to jail.
Time and $ have run out.
We will see long overdue US health care reform in 2009 and it will include a public health care option.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Jun 26, 2009 3:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Less money for retirement
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: Less money for retirement
Posted by: anneliese-nyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jun 26, 2009 3:46 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
question... how does the canadian system pay for itself??? what is the overall tax rate for an average family today if it is from payroll deductions, or think I remember being told somewhere along the line it was paid for by an end use sales tax on most everything...
might seem silly to ask at this stage of the game, but just can't remember right now... someone jump in here please???
back to coffee...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: the canadian system...
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: the Canadian system...
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: the Canadian system...
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: the Canadian system...
Posted by: Annarisse
» Not Much Difference
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Not Much Difference
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: Not Much Difference
Posted by: donl51
» Here's an article about it at
Posted by: harpy
» How the canadian system pays for itself.
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annarisse on Jun 26, 2009 3:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm in Canada, so:
1) When I asked to see a specialist, it took a couple of weeks to get me an appointment - but once I did, I was booked for a simple surgery that works about 80% of the time within a couple of weeks.
2) Meanwhile, I was off sick from work, using my work-based benefits to take the time I needed to get my iron levels up higher.
3) When the low ferratin resulted in depression (a common but little-known side effect) I took up nearly an hour of a doctor's time explaining how overwhelmed I was, and getting help in the form of counseling while still working on the ferratin levels. No meds were pushed on me for the depression.
4) When the first surgery caused a complication that had me back in the emergency room a few months later, I was on the table for surgery within six hours. A few months later, the problem was permanently fixed with a much bigger surgery. (This is a surgery that is hard for a young woman to get in the States, because the doctors worry that a woman might change her mind about permanently giving up her fertility. Many women in their early thirties can't find a doctor who will do it. When I said I wanted it, my doctor switched from "options" to "explanations of the procedure" without blinking an eyelash - because I wouldn't be able to sue him if my only problem was that I changed my mind, anyway.)
5) Through all of this, my total expenditures have been only a few hundred dollars - for iron pills, for other supplies related to my illness, and for parking at the hospital. That's it. I have no remaining sick time, but I didn't have any unpaid days, I didn't lose my job, and there was not one single co-pay in sight.
6) My return to health is being monitored by my GP, with the help of a nutritionist, because my underlying condition is likely to lead to type II diabetes if I don't get on top of that now, and I'd like to hold that off as long as I can.
Meanwhile, I had a friend in the States going through a very similar medical story. It took her a year longer, two doctors who turned her down, losing her job and nearly her house, and a thousand dollars in co-pays. Now, her insurance won't pay for the nutritionist who could help her manage her condition so she doesn't get Type II diabetes.
So who got the better service? Yes, I had a couple of waits of a few weeks, and had to wait two months for my surgery - which gave me time to prepare to be off work and be really certain I wanted it. But all told, I got the care I needed. My American friend did not, and she paid more for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Maybe if american tax dollars...
Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: Getting sick, then better, in Canada
Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Getting sick, then better, in Canada
Posted by: Annarisse
» I had to wait 3 months for a specialist here in the US
Posted by: harpy
» RE: Getting sick, then better, in Canada
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kegbot1 on Jun 26, 2009 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sara you lay out the case well and I have noticed the differences. When I visit Toronto and see where my friends work I am struck by the way the workplace is so much more relaxed than ours. People in Canada are generally treated like human beings on their job, not like serfs.
Speaking of small business, I've been running one for two years without health insurance. when it comes up I tell my customers (in this very red county) that one accident, one invasive procedure, one serious illness and the business they love so much is gone, gone, gone. Many of them, however, are imbued with the stupid Puritanism that had not poisoned Canada - they fervently believe if you can't afford health insurance, you probably don't deserve it.
Now I have health insurance thanks to Cleveland's domestic partnership program and the fact that my SO works for (shudder) JP Morgan/Chase which offers the benefits to one domestic partner. I had to move into Cleveland for it and away from my mother's house where I had been caring for her and her numerous maladies. If it weren't for Medicare she would have been dead years ago or locked in a nursing home. But you do what you have to do down here. I've told people when I didn't have insurance that if I had a heart attack, I'd rather die on the way to the hospital than spend the rest of my life trying to pay medical bills no honest man could pay.
But Sara, it's not going to happen. We now live in a country totally dominated by business interests and their bought and paid for Congress who could care less what we want. There's a lot of war material to spend money on to defend us from the latest bogeyman. In my youth it was the Godless Commies, now it's the Godless Islamists. Funny that. In the meantime a system that one would have expected to see in Dickensian Britain is now accepted as the standard for America.
And when you get down to the core of why the American people accept this it comes down to: the 'haves' have been scared by the industry and the cons to believe they will 'lose' what they have AND that medical care and their taxes (the ones not now spent on war) will go to the stereotypical 'welfare mothers' (read: minority) who don't 'deserve' it.
It's a sad, sad situation and I don't see any improvement in this culture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, kegbot1, I know, I know . . .
Posted by: hagwind
» I talk to everyone I can
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: I talk to everyone I can
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: I've heard the same thing...
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jun 26, 2009 4:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.health-care-reform.net/causedeath.htm
The situation has almost certainly got worse since then.
Whilst in the UK, the National Health Service has deteriotated considerably since it was started after WWII (when the UK was in a state of almost complete bankruptcy), the NHS is still functional.
Anyone in the UK can see a Doctor or go to Hospital and receive immediate treatment which is usually of a very high standard for FREE.
Of course the system isn't perfect, but it is there for everyone.
Similar care is available throughout much of Europe.
However, the UK system is being corrupted by US influence - particularly with Doctors vastly over-precribing drugs.
The major problem with health is caused by poor diet and lifestyle. Whilst drugs can mask symptoms - for example they can lower blood pressure and cholesterol, they cannot resolve the root cause of bad health. There is a great deal of evidence that long term use of an enormous range of drugs cause significant harm. The side effects then tend to be treated with other drugs. People think they are receiving good health care - when in reality their body is being poisoned for the benefit of Drug Company Profits.
Drugs are of course useful - particularly on a short term basis - and can save lives for certain specific diseases.
But the real life saver is not to get ill in the first place. That can be achieved by a healthy diverse diet using natural foods that have not been processed, together with taking at least a reasonable amount of exercise.
Stress is a natural and normal part of life, but the body is designed to overcome the symptoms of stress by vigorous exercise (fight or flight scenario). But the modern world results in stress build up, that tends not to be released by exercise - but masked by drugs or alcohol.
It is an exceedingly good idea, to not take any form of drugs or alcohol for several days a week - and instead go for a long cycle ride and enjoy the natural dopamine released by the body as a result of the vigourous exercise.
Sure you might fall off your bike and kill yourself - but on the other hand - the exercise might keep you alive and healthy for another 30-40 years.
RIP Michael Jackson. I suspect what really killed him was doing relatively nothing for over 10 years - and then doing far too much in a short space of time to prepare for a most Gruelling schedule of doing 50 shows in London at the O2 arena.
He should have ramped up very gradually. A 50 year old man - cannot suddenly become a young athlete again - if he has taken 10 years off.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health Care is the US is one of the Greatest Causes of Death
Posted by: dogdiva
» So it is Being Reported in The UK that Michael Jackson's Doctor Has Dun a Runner
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Health Care is the US is one of the Greatest Causes of Death
Posted by: sandy55
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grmartin on Jun 26, 2009 4:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Even then it costs less than half of the U.S.
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Canadian system is not cheap
Posted by: Steppin Razor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: matty848 on Jun 26, 2009 5:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-Matt
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What did I give up?
Posted by: red godowar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Jun 26, 2009 5:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is way out of proportion.Dentists are the true ruling elite and the worst rip off artists of the century.Their cost structure is pre -medicare era.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BA
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: BA
Posted by: walldodger1969
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Freticat on Jun 26, 2009 6:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am on Medicare, but the annual deductible is higher than my monthly income. Typically, on my first doctor visit of the year, I get billed for a lump sum that is more than I can afford to pay (it's either that or forgo food, utilities and hope my landlord understands when I can't pay my full month's rent). Thus, I either put off seeing the doctor as long as possible or end up ducking collection calls for months on end (thank the gods for caller ID!).
Last year, a cat who had been part of my life for nineteen years got a serious infection at the same time I got quite sick. I could pay a vet bill or a doctor bill but not both. I chose to spend the money on my cat and weather my own illness without help. Here's what made the difference: my vet let me pay in installments that I could afford; my doctor's office, a large clinic attached to a local hospital, would not.
The cat died; I ended up not seeing my doctor for another six months, when my escalating complaints finally became too uncomfortable to ignore.
That's no way to live.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No More Doctor-Businessmen
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: No More Doctor-Businessmen
Posted by: Freticat
» RE: "no physician should be rich from medical practice"
Posted by: kettleblack
» Shzaam!
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» Simple answers are often wrong.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» the right simple answer is what we want
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: the right simple answer is what we want
Posted by: wtfo
» I agree - let's not punish the docs.
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» The right simple answer is single payer
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: Simple answers are often wrong.
Posted by: Annarisse
» Many Veterinarians are becoming extremely profit oriented
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Many Veterinarians are becoming extremely profit oriented
Posted by: maglindracia
» RE: Last Year I Had A Choice
Posted by: anneliese-nyc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Jun 26, 2009 6:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plan A costs nothing monthly out of the SS check BUT when they are admitted to the hospital the cost up front is about $1,000.
Thr Government Plan for the elderly, Medicare is NOT FREE.
I see a lot of 3rd world people on TV that actually look healthier than our citizens. Our elected leaders are living in a fantasy world, and are DRUNK on taxpayer $$$ and the perks offered by corrupt lobbyist policies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: lderly on Medicare PAY Dearly with funds they may not have OR...
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: elderly on Medicare PAY Dearly with funds they may not have OR...
Posted by: picket
» Very simple: Listen
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Very simple: Listen
Posted by: picket
» We Agree!
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: lderly on Medicare PAY Dearly with funds they may not have OR...
Posted by: Annarisse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 26, 2009 6:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all of the bs talk about "free choice" and "competition" - please tell me what about a single payer option will not force the Industry to change their behavior toward those they continue to rip off with high premium payments, denial of care coverage, and double speak?!? You better believe that if Congress got treated the same as the "average American" with coverage - they would change their position quickly! Those obstructionist Congresspersons - need to feel the heat from their constituents whether you have insurance or not! Call, fax, email - tell them to get off their ever so cushioned butts and finally do what is right for the nation - not the corporations!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's sick ... that Congress gets Single Payer Health Care
Posted by: kettleblack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 26, 2009 6:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I finally got a job that provided health insurance, paying $180/mo for my premiums when I started. After the premiums doubled, my company could no longer afford to pay. They gave me a raise and said it was up to me to pay my own insurance from then on. I have no health issues and on no medications, my premiums went up to $400/mo, then $500/mo. within one year. They recently wanted an increase to $600/mo so I had to up double my deductible to keep my payments at $500. I am sure it will go up by next year. I haven't gotten a pay raise since Bush was selected president and there's no raise on the horizon in this economy.
My (first and only) new car, back in 2001 only cost $320/mo. If I add my homeowners insurance, flood insurance, windstorm insurance, auto insurance (including uninsured motorist insurance), THE BULK OF MY PAYCHECK GOES TO THE INSURANCE RACKET! All with deductibles and deniables! (And they always turn to the tax payers for bailouts during a crisis.)
I AM MAD AS HELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!
Sushi
"There are more important things in life than money...but they all cost money. "
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: $500/month and rising
Posted by: rafaeltoral
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 26, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carrotwax on Jun 26, 2009 6:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course that's true. But it's also true that a family might pay $5000 more in taxes and save $10000 a year in other health care costs they would have otherwise paid. Or the employer would save that $10000, which could then be negotiated into having higher wages.
I'm an American also living in Canada, and it's all true. This last year I've had a serious illness, seen a whole bunch of specialists, had tests, and haven't paid. Doctors also love it because they get to focus on the actual medicine which is why they got into it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Taxes are a phony issue
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: Well put Foon, we already
Posted by: marid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thekidde on Jun 26, 2009 7:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this a great country I fought for, or what. Fuck the bankers and Wall Streeters. Perhaps we'll meet in the street soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If it weren't for the costs of health care...
Posted by: Sushi
» VA charges?
Posted by: johnwinthrop
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AAWeeble3 on Jun 26, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Absolute Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Troll Alert. Do not click on link
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnnydajogger on Jun 26, 2009 7:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If it weren't for premiums...
Posted by: Sushi
» Odd.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: education
Posted by: lfish
» education starts when the instution starts to teach
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 26, 2009 7:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, would my employer really pay me another ~$7,000 if they weren't subsidizing my health care? Or would FEMACare care simply take that money from my employer AND me via a taxes, and then deliver me something that might hopefully approach the care I already enjoy?
A "public option" (great frame, by the way, reminiscent of "No Child Left Behind") would be fine, as long as it was paid for by the folks it covered. You know--if the public really did have an option as to both enrolling and paying for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Maybe yes, maybe no
Posted by: FoonTheElder
» RE: "...the care you already enjoy"?
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tmgibs on Jun 26, 2009 7:45 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh well, as long as I get to go on an international vacation every year and manage my investments why should I worry about that. (I can always go to the US and pay for it since I always go on international vacations and have investments).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» WTF?
Posted by: Annarisse
» Translation
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» Elegant Summation of Conservative Attitude Toward Healthcare
Posted by: iolanthe
» RE: Disinformation and lies
Posted by: Bloomer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adorabelledearheart on Jun 26, 2009 8:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching this family have a medical crisis in their chief breadwinner without it becoming a financial disaster was enlightening and transformative. Folks, we don't have to live this way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sableskin on Jun 26, 2009 8:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in excellent health, with no dependents. I can only imagine what those add-on would be. I have colleagues who are either married, and use 1 spouse to cover the entire family, or colleauges who use one person to cover an entire extended family, including children. If the second scenario was ever caught, there would be dire consequences, but this is more common than one might think. I don't for a minute underestimate how lucky I am, and thank goodness I have never had any major medical emergencies. For a single person, I spend THROUGH THE ROOF to buy food of the best quality that I can (GOOD LUCK)and spend dearly to keep my pets in good health. As I get older, the body requires more (nature of the beast), and I will probably not leave Federal service to keep the health care. In the end, however, when I see my paycheck, and the amount of money that goes to healthcare ALONE, I can only be glad that I can afford it, because it certainly doesn't seem worth it. I would LOVE to be able to share it with someone who couldn't afford any, but without dependents or fraud, that cannot happen. Healthcare in thois country is but one wasted resource, but I am terrified to be without it.
I realize that this particular demographic may not seem worthy of sympathy, but when you ask what I’ve given up, I can tell you. I don’t have kids, and probably won’t because the idea of being single and trying to negotiate the health system with a healthy one or two is mindboggling. Its not just direct health care, it’s the childcare, the childhood injuries, my illnesses, their illnesses. Healthcare actually responds to overall well-being, and in the case of children that is everything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kettleblack on Jun 26, 2009 8:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The conservatives gotta love that!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Talk about a union buster!...uh, no
Posted by: CLaudLaw
» RE: Talk about a union buster!
Posted by: Annarisse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wtfo on Jun 26, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I simply cannot seem to get my mind around what changed over the last 20+ years but SOMETHING has changed drastically. In my childhood days, my parents never seemed to have to make the heart-rending decisions on whether to eat, pay the mortgage, pay the utility bills, etc. vs. pay for any healthcare issues for the family.
My parents were not rich by any stretch of the imagination. However, they somehow managed to raise us just fine and we were always taken care of whenever we became seriously sick, injured, or needed medical attention. I don't remember if my father always had health insurance provided by his employers but he changed jobs quite a bit and we always seemed to have affordable access to health care whenever we needed it.
What changed? Now, my mother is terrified about healthcare - and she is covered by Medicare. Myself and my children are paying a very large percentage of their income for health insurance if we can even find or hold it - and my children are very healthy and have never been hospitalized since being out on their own!
It seems to me that our entire nation is transfixed by a palpable fear about continued access to affordable healthcare. Concern over this issue is practically running our lives now and consuming ever greater percentages of everybody's incomes. All indications are that the problem will get much worse before it gets better - if that ever happens at all in my lifetime.
Unless we as a country finally decide to do something permanent about this problem, it will continue to grow and may eventually consume us. The arguments about how to pay for it are pretty much smoke screens because it should by now seem obvious that we have no other option than to FIND A WAY TO PAY FOR IT SOMEHOW! We have no alternative. It is not moral for a nation to ration something as necessary as healthcare based solely on ability to pay. If you do this you are essentially saying that "If you need somebody to treat you medically and you cannot pay for it upfront, then I guess you just should crawl off somewhere (preferably out of my sight) and die". My heart bleeds for you but, you see, I have to look out for MY health and the health of MY loved ones and "you are on your own"!
This sort of philosophy is not something a country should be proud of IMHO. But apparently, it is the current price of being American and part of "the great experiment in free-market capitalism". However, looking back again - I don't remember my parents agreeing to this philosophy...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Looking back...
Posted by: CLaudLaw
» RE: Looking back...
Posted by: wtfo
» You nailed it
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: You nailed it
Posted by: wtfo
» I would suggest another strategy
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 26, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 26, 2009 11:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If my cancer returns, I'm dead. No one will treat cancer without insurance. Period. And no one who has had cancer and then lost insurance can get coverage for cancer again.
The American people are giving up more than ever to keep this broken system. Their system has deemed me not "worthy" of big expenditures, not important enough to save if I get sick again. Well, guess what? I deem this fucked-up system too broken to warrant saving!
Single payer for ALL. It's the only humane way.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Essentially, you've been 'triaged'
Posted by: kegbot1
» RE: ssentially, you've been 'triaged'
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: You are not disposable
Posted by: paradigm2009
» RE: What have I given up?
Posted by: paradigm2009
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frankly1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The USA has government of/for/by the people, but not Canada
Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Jun 26, 2009 11:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FUCKING DOCTORS
"Police ‘searching for Jackson’s doctor’
Staff Reporter Published:Jun 26, 2009
LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles police were reported to be searching for Michael Jackson’s personal doctor to question him over allegations that the star received a potentially fatal dose of the painkiller Demerol before his death yesterday afternoon"
People are Going To Get ANGRY
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And Neil Young Is Singing Live at Glastonbury - Broadcast on BBC - THE NEEDLE AND THE DAMAGE DONE
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jun 26, 2009 12:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My premiums are only a little over $130 a month, but that doesn't include dental or eye glasses. I also have copays and have to pick up the tab for whatever the insurance company refuses to pay. When I count up all the little costs, it's a whole lot more than I'd pay in a tax increase for single payer. Even so, it's a bargain compared to most people's insurance. And I haven't had any major illnesses, either.
I have a friend who is dying of cancer. I went to visit him after he came home from Duke where he underwent an innovative treatment that did not help him. His wife related some of the hassles she encountered while dealing with the insurance companies, and I offered my opinion that we need single payer health insurance like every other industrialized country. My friend said he disagreed, that it would entail yet another layer of government bureaucracy. Because he is so frail (and in spite of the fact that he, in his better days would have loved a lively argument about this), I didn't say, "Oh, like the bureaucracy we have to wade through to send our kids to school, get firefighters to come to our homes, or call 911 for help." And I didn't say that at least we wouldn't, as he is doing, leave our spouses in debt - in spite of having insurance.
It's amazing how steeped in misinformation people are. Yes, I am sure that there are Canadians who have serious reservations about their system, and I did read the post by one of them here. Perhaps people in Canada do die from lack of care, but it's far fewer than it is here, and they don't die from exposure to the elements after going bankrupt and becoming homeless.
I know at least two people who have declared bankruptcy due to medical bills. I know some who had to get jobs working for someone else rather than maintain their own businesses because of medical insurance costs. I have co-workers who are in debt because of medical problems that were not completely covered by their insurance. I have family and friends who can't afford insurance and live from day to day worrying about what will happen if they get sick or hurt.
It's easy for people who are healthy to say all we need to do is eat well and get exercise and then we won't need insurance, as some posters to this article have done. But what about people - like at least two of my friends - who got rear-ended by another driver and wound up with serious injuries. Of course, these should have been taken care of with the auto insurance, but one of them was hit by an uninsured driver, and my friend was told he'd have to sue his own insurance company to get the payments from his uninsured motorists coverage.
Anyone out there who doesn't despise insurance companies? There may be some, but I don't know anyone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» its not misinformation, its brainwashing
Posted by: kegbot1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jun 26, 2009 1:20 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Working with the poor in third world areas I see healthy happy people who eat beans, rice, fresh fruits and teas. None of the hamburgers, huge pizzas, high corn syrup beverages. Even 'health foods' have labels that we need to read, since big corporations will show whole grains and dried fruits on the packaging and people assume the item is 'healthy'. But look closer and the item is loaded with fat and corn sweeteners. Another thing that bugs me is items that say 'less fat'. 'low fat', and people assume the item is healthier and that they can eat more. But read the label and its high in calories. And not at all healthy.
And what about issues like drug and alcohol. These demand huge amounts of money to treat. Yet, we see little being done to keep people from ever trying them. We live in a 'me' society where people demand they be allowed to be FREE. Yet when their freedom becomes an addiction they want someone else to bail them out. Same with people who refuse to be physically active, eat wise, get enough sleep and other preventative measures.
As for issues like broken bones etc. How many people have a walk in closet full of clothes that when added up to a value of 10k? How many people spend $5 a day at Starbucks? That's $150 per month that could be put toward an affordable health care policy for issues like broken bones. Personally I don't like or do fast food. But when I see people in cars lined up at McDonalds day after day, spending an average of $10 I figure that would be better spent on a healthcare plan. Not to mention eating junk means poor health. So its a double whammy.
Now I would like to know how do we afford a government healthcare for everyone whose lifestyle choices are causing the majority of problems? Unless you plug the leaks all we will have is a major gusher later on.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lifestyle changes bring down health costs
Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Lifestyle changes bring down health costs
Posted by: wtfo
» RE: Lifestyle changes bring down health costs
Posted by: paradigm2009
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 26, 2009 1:44 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jun 26, 2009 1:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grindermonkey on Jun 26, 2009 2:46 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep the blinds drawn.
He is the Antichrist, a shadow on the sun.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: liblady2008 on Jun 26, 2009 3:48 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not surprisingly none of that is going to happen amy time soon. Bill Maher summed up why last Friday in his "New Rules" segment. In a nutshell the people are moving left of center left while the democrats are now right of center (the new republicans) and the republicans are way, way right of that these days - and prone to blatant lying.
To get anything major done for the common good st this juncture will take massive civil protests and unrest. Until that happens we will find ourselves in an increasingly Orwellian world - and the only western country, as far as I can tell, where one can go bankrupt because they had the nerve to get cancer or have a stroke.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: deang on Jun 26, 2009 3:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if you go to France of Cuba or Nicaragua or Venezuela, residents can't even comprehend the US phenomenon of not taking vacation time at all in order to stay on your employer's good side, something common in the US.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daidactic on Jun 26, 2009 4:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it was sobering for me to read this article.
It comes down to a fundamental question - what is the point of the USA as a state?
It appears to be to make war and support the wealthy but until you understand that Americans should be able to run the state ( only joing!) You are stuck with state you are in. Free health care for all, as I can expect in the UK, requires that the state picks up the tab.
So what is the USA for? Why does it exist if it cannot prouide what you need?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Health care and the USA
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Jun 26, 2009 5:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about that, and would rather fix the system by purging it of all democrats and republicans and other lying, elite fascists.
Either way, I'm sick of the feds taking something like 4x what the state gets, and doling out tiny pieces of it back with strings attached, all so they can use our taxes to force us to support mass murder, oppression and the slicing out the world for large multinational corporations.
I can't call anyone crazy for wanting out of that. I'd call some people crazy for being complacent with supporting it.
Even though single payer would save people money, I'm still for saving at least 300 Billion/year from the defense budget. I'm kinda thinking if we invade less countries and wage less psychological and covert insurgent campaigns domestically and abroad, our need for spending more than we have and as much as the rest of the world combined may diminish some.
Maybe we can take some money from the war on drugs and get some tax dollars instead of making criminals and convects of non-violent people who just want to chill.
Maybe we can save some money by not opening a whole new division of the FTC to track things bloggers say online. If it's anything like Obama's campaign "truth squads", they'll just use it as an excuse to stifle people from mentioning things he doesn't like but his people get a license to BS. Yeah, I don't want to pay more for that either.
Will that cover it? Oops, single payer would save money on essentials, and bring down the costs of voluntary services. Never mind.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: silver flute on Jun 26, 2009 6:58 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that once you passed the unbelievablly high hurdles of getting your Social Security Disability, and after the lawyers took 25% of your back SSDI payments, you could count on health care. If your health is that bad then you need medical care, right?
This isn't a choice any person I know would make, it's not like going on vacation or frittering your moeny away.....it's your luck of the draw to have a genetic illness, although we, as a Nation could change how toxic things are, if the Feds wanted to.
Well, that also means you have Medicare at an early age, and at first that was like the prime insurance because the Feds paid the bill. Not any more..... In fact, I have likened it to being in some type of "health care death camp" for disabled and elderly.
My story gets worse each year, and I am not even 60 yrs. old.....plus the Feds are telling me that this insurance is going broke and I'll be uninsurable, too.
I also get Medicaid as I am living on so little, and that pays for the premiums. Now, I get billed for part of those, pay co-pays for meds, pay for deductibles at the ER, can't find any doctor in my state to even take Medicare, and I can't get the doctors who are familiar with my illness AT ALL! So, I fly on donated air miles to Washington state from Alaska for a doctor, air ship my medicine that I need and pray I don't need to go to the ER while I am filing bankruptcy (having borrowed the money for that from my 81-yr. old parents)and filing paperwork to have the money I owe at the hospital written off. What?!?!?!?!
I have been put on a protocol of treatment that uses high, high doses of vitamins and minerals and other natural things that my body has used up or didn't have, for my illness, that is compounded by a registered pharmacy and prescribed by a specialist, but is not covered by Medicare part D because there is a law that forbids Medicare from paying for vitamins and mineral therapy....you see this isn't pharmaceuticals! This would include vitamins for scurvy and rickets, too! My treatment costs me over 75% of my disability income each month! Now, it seems to me that when I have to petition Congress to have my medicine paid for to get well, while I am fully insured, that we have more than one health care problem. They are named INSURANCE COMPANIES, BIG PHARMA AND EACH AND EVERY ONE OF OUR CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATES. I had hoped that Obama would use his power as Pres to get this fixed, but now I think I had better get my affairs in order.....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: living on Medicare is sending me into bankrutpcy
Posted by: wtfo
» I'm sorry
Posted by: james108
» RE: living on Medicare is sending me into bankrutpcy
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robert56 on Jun 26, 2009 10:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You guys are being ripped off something awful.
I strongly suggest you investigate our system and agitate with you local politicians to try to get some sort of similar system in America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why are you Americans paying so much for health care?
Posted by: snax
» RE: Why are you Americans paying so much for health care?
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snax on Jun 27, 2009 8:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really want to go out on my own and start a business, but there is simply no way we could afford health insurance with my spouses pre-existing condition. The Republicans like to talk about protecting and fostering a free market, but by propping up these 7 mega-conglomerate health insurance companies, they are really hell bent on quashing entrepreneurs.
It's either raw greed, insanity, or flat out stupidity that keeps the Republicans towing the same tired line. And when it comes to the voters, I have a hard time believing it goes much beyond the last option.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JSquercia on Jun 27, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to love these guys they are calling their Group GOP Caucus for Fairness . That's RIGHT the same people who are afraid the FCC may reinstate the Fairness Doctrine are complaining about Fairness .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 1cclady on Jun 27, 2009 9:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Leakman on Jun 28, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: revjmike on Jun 29, 2009 8:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fortunately we do have some social insurance for disabled folk, so my wife, who had a stroke, is covered by Medicaid due to blindness and our VERY, VERY low income. (This from someone with a Masters Degree and a Bachelors in Medical Technology.
After reading what you've said it is even tempting to move to Canada. I can't, so I'll continue to work for health care reform.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jul 1, 2009 8:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about a list of the costs to a patient to have the inefficient fed gov-meant gumming up the works? We all know anything the gov-meant starts costs 3-5x what they always say to sell it to you socialist suckas.
Try making sense just once..oooo, you can't...liberals are Oz landers basing everything on feelings and others taxes...please don't pretend you have a clue...or that facts matter to you...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: At the end of the day...
Posted by: wtfo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JS99 on Jul 3, 2009 6:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in Ireland the healthcare system is straining to breaking at the moment but from my own personal experience I pay 800euro($1120) per year for Health Insurance for myself and my daughter. I recently had to go to hospital and have a colonoscopy and endoscopy performed. Total cost to me 250euro($350) including GP, Consultant and 6 week course of medicine. Total waiting time 2 weeks, after the initial GP visit had a consultant visit within 4 days and then procedure 1.5 weeks later.
The Irish system is far from perfect but I would not be able to afford to be sick if I lived in the USA and would probably end up being one of the 22000
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Could Your Cell Phone End Up Killing You?
The Overuse of Antibiotics in Livestock Feed Is Killing Us
One of the Most Common Chemicals Used in Modern Life Is Now Being Seen as a Health Threat




