PERSONAL HEALTH  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 13

Are Pesticides Causing Parkinson's Disease?

Scientists are closing in on an inescapable conclusion: Pesticides may be a cause of Parkinson's disease.
June 19, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Personal Health headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Pesticides seemed the most likely culprit. "Animal models have shown that specific pesticides can cause parkinsonian changes," Kamel says, "and we have mechanistic data also" -- that is, evidence of biological processes at the level of the interaction between brain cells and the chemicals in common pesticides -- that can explain how a cause-and-effect relationship might work. "To the degree we understand the neurological mechanisms that may be related to Parkinson's disease," Kamel says, "it seems that certain specific pesticides might play a role."

"Despite remaining uncertainties and data gaps," wrote the authors of the 2008 report by the Science and Environmental Health Network -- Jill Stein, Ted Schettler, Ben Rohrer, and Maria Valenti -- "the body of evidence linking pesticide exposure to Parkinson's disease fulfills generally accepted criteria for establishing causation." When combined with "extensive laboratory animal data" specifying the underlying biology of this relationship, they wrote, "collectively, this evidence supports the conclusion that pesticide exposures can cause Parkinson's disease in some people."

Like most other population studies, this one has no way of proving that, for any one individual, X definitely led to Y -- that Jackie Christensen's early-onset Parkinson's disease, for instance, was caused by her exposure to pesticides as a teenager. To Christensen, however, the causal connection is clear. Growing up in rural Minnesota, she spent summers working on local farms. In her early teens, this meant engaging in a practice known as "walking beans." A pickup truck would drop off a bunch of youngsters, including Christensen, at one end of a field, and they would walk the rows of soybeans, weeding as they went. Later, Christensen and her friends rode a "bean buggy," a rig attached to the front of a tractor from which they would spray the herbicide Roundup, sometimes dyed purple so they could see where it was landing, carefully aiming for the weeds and trying to avoid the beans. Often she was dressed in nothing more than a bathing suit and a baseball cap. "I had a great tan those summers," she wrote in the introduction to her book, The First Year: Parkinson's Disease; An Essential Guide for the Newly Diagnosed, "and I had no idea nor gave any thought whatsoever to what I might be exposing myself to, or what the effects might be. After the first day or two of spraying, I could no longer smell the odor of the herbicide. I do remember that when I would come home, my mother would immediately tell me to take a shower because I smelled like chemicals."

As a young adult, Christensen had a single massive chemical exposure, during a political demonstration that involved wading into the Mississippi River in St. Louis. Wastewater treatment runoff made the water as neon green as Mountain Dew. She says it's "anybody's guess" what was in the water, but since many of the industries in
St. Louis at the time discharged their wastes into the river, she says the brew probably included organophosphate pesticides, dry cleaning solvents, and other compounds. "After that action, within an hour I had a headache," she says, "and I was nauseated and felt fatigued and lousy for a week. I know now that those are common symptoms of acute pesticide poisoning. At the time I didn't think about what was causing it. I was 25 and thought I was bulletproof."

Since the British physician James Parkinson first described the "shaking palsy" in 1817, Parkinson's disease has been linked to a variety of possible environmental causes, both natural and artificial. It has been linked, too, to genetic factors, dating back to the beginning of the twentieth century, when early-onset Parkinson's was first found to run in a few scattered, unlucky families. Those who study the connection between Parkinson's and the environment suggest that it's probably the combined result of having a genetic predisposition to the disease and a dangerous exposure to some sort of neurotoxin. A favorite expression of people in this field is that "genetics loads the gun and environment pulls the trigger."

In the 1950s, scientists noticed that a large proportion of the Chamorro people, who live on the Pacific island of Guam, were gripped by a syndrome that rendered them stiff and immobile by middle age. It looked a lot like Parkinson's disease. What made the situation so fascinating (and so perplexing) was that in some patients the symptoms were closer to two other neurodegenerative diseases -- Alzheimer's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease). After decades of research, scientists discovered that the culprit was a local dietary staple: a rodent known as a fruit bat. The bat drank nectar from the cycad tree, from which it received a concentrated dose of a brain toxin, the amino acid beta-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA). When people ate the meat of the fruit bat, they ingested huge amounts of BMAA. The story was told in 2002, when the journal Neurology published an article about the fruit bats and their "biomagnification" of BMAA. The findings are still the subject of some debate, but they were consistent with the accumulating picture: that at least some environmental agents might account for at least some forms of parkinsonism.


Robin Marantz Henig is a contributing writer to the New York Times Magazine. She is the recipient of a 2009 Guggenheim Foundation fellowship, and is the author of eight books on science, including The Monk in the Garden (Houghton Mifflin), a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Personal Health headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: health, farming, pesticides


Comments are closed-

Mark Purdey, BSE,Madcows
Posted by: mtnprivy on Jun 19, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those of you who are interested in this subject should read about Mark Purdey, organophosphates, and mad cow disease (BSE).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't forget autism. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» The truth is out there. Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

a return to organic farming
Posted by: vasumurti on Jun 19, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to see a return to organic farming. In 1989, concern over the use of the pesticide Alar on apples caused many Americans to consider organic produce. We produce pesticides at a rate some 13,000 times faster than we did in the 1950s. Our environment is being flooded by pesticide compounds.

Poisons used to kill insects accumulate on crops, in the soil and in greater concentration in the tissues of living creatures higher on the food chain. The EPA's Pesticide Monitoring Journal reports that "Foods of animal origin (are) the major source of pesticide residues in the diet."

In his Pulitzer Prize nominated book, How to Survive in America the Poisoned, pesticide authority Lewis Regenstein writes: "Meat contains approximately 14 times more pesticides than do plant foods...Thus, by eating foods of animal origin, one ingests greatly concentrated amounts of hazardous chemicals."

A 1976 study by the EPA found the breast milk of mothers who consume animal products to be 50 to 100 times more contaminated by pesticide residues than the milk of vegetarian or vegan mothers.

Organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) are getting more attention today. These utilize natural insect controls, such as predatory insects, weather, crop rotation, pest-resistant varieties, soil tillage, and other environmentally safe practices.

A 1979 Department of Agriculture task force of scientists and economists came to "...positive conclusions on the importance of organic farming and its potential contributions to agriculture and society." Until the end of the Second World War, American farmers produced bountiful harvests without relying on pesticides. There is no reason why America cannot do so again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

whose life is it???
Posted by: maxsmart on Jun 19, 2009 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It could well be that all life on Earth, this tiny jewel in space, basking in the rays of our only begotten Sun, is related, interconnected, shares genetic characteristic!
And as such poisoning one tends toward poisoning everyone in a rather suicidal way!

Employing chemical warfare against life, even weeds we dislike, is an example of the futility of war to solve problems when there is so much collateral damage to the rest of life in general.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: whose life is it??? Posted by: sirios
» RE: whose life is it??? Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

And they call me a "health nut."
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 19, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I graduated high school 37 years ago, I have eaten as natural and organic a diet as possible; whole grains, pesticide/antibiotic/hormone-free, and have been berated for it. Meanwhile, at 55, I have no health issues, still fit my size 5 jeans, have virtually no wrinkles.

I continue to buy the majority of my groceries from organic sources and go out of my way to support the small farms. I eat no junk foods. I read ingredient labels and nutrition books.

On a side note, one of my friends has had 4 dogs (different breeds, different sources, different years) all come down with and die from lymphoma. She regularly let them romp on the lawn of a church that was regularly dosed with pesticides. Coincidence? She's since stopped letting her new dogs on the church grounds. None of them are sick.

Call me a nut. I like nuts!

Sushi
"How did you get so round from eating square meals?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It's not just pesticides...
Posted by: minmotstand on Jun 19, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heavy metals have been implicated by dozens of population-based studies, showing increased risks of Parkinson's disease associated with exposures to metals such as mercury, lead, manganese, aluminum, iron, copper, cadmium, and zinc.

Keep in mind, that the essential trace elements I've mentioned are in their toxic forms after release from industry - e.g. iron (III) and other divalent, trivalent metals.

Excessive intake of required metals such as iron can also become toxic, however.

Industry has been associated with Parkinson's disease in several studies.

Parkinson's disease has been reported as far back as 5,000 years, so pesticides can't be the only thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

So some of us
Posted by: osd on Jun 19, 2009 5:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are not surprised by all of this. Enviromental pollution is the same as taking a dump in your glass of water. So why would you do something like that? So why do we pollute the air, water and soil that grows our food. We need this to stay alive, so why do they pollute? Money/greed, why is it that everything always comes down to the seven deadly sins. These were well names, even if your not religous. The more some people get, the more they want. They seem to have lost sight that this Planet is heaven.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

allen
Posted by: pursah on Jun 20, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems only logical. Pesticides are neuro-toxins. They kill by poisoning the nerves of the bugs. People have nerves, too. Pesticides that build-up to critical mass will kill any being that has nerve cells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Obama and the Dems in charge now, the chemical companies will be forced to stop using disease causing chemicals on our foods. Oh, bullshit...who am I kidding?
Welders are also susceptible to Parkinson due to inorganic manganese.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Mark Purdey, BSE,Madcows
Posted by: mtnprivy on Jun 19, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those of you who are interested in this subject should read about Mark Purdey, organophosphates, and mad cow disease (BSE).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't forget autism. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» The truth is out there. Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

a return to organic farming
Posted by: vasumurti on Jun 19, 2009 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to see a return to organic farming. In 1989, concern over the use of the pesticide Alar on apples caused many Americans to consider organic produce. We produce pesticides at a rate some 13,000 times faster than we did in the 1950s. Our environment is being flooded by pesticide compounds.

Poisons used to kill insects accumulate on crops, in the soil and in greater concentration in the tissues of living creatures higher on the food chain. The EPA's Pesticide Monitoring Journal reports that "Foods of animal origin (are) the major source of pesticide residues in the diet."

In his Pulitzer Prize nominated book, How to Survive in America the Poisoned, pesticide authority Lewis Regenstein writes: "Meat contains approximately 14 times more pesticides than do plant foods...Thus, by eating foods of animal origin, one ingests greatly concentrated amounts of hazardous chemicals."

A 1976 study by the EPA found the breast milk of mothers who consume animal products to be 50 to 100 times more contaminated by pesticide residues than the milk of vegetarian or vegan mothers.

Organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) are getting more attention today. These utilize natural insect controls, such as predatory insects, weather, crop rotation, pest-resistant varieties, soil tillage, and other environmentally safe practices.

A 1979 Department of Agriculture task force of scientists and economists came to "...positive conclusions on the importance of organic farming and its potential contributions to agriculture and society." Until the end of the Second World War, American farmers produced bountiful harvests without relying on pesticides. There is no reason why America cannot do so again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

whose life is it???
Posted by: maxsmart on Jun 19, 2009 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It could well be that all life on Earth, this tiny jewel in space, basking in the rays of our only begotten Sun, is related, interconnected, shares genetic characteristic!
And as such poisoning one tends toward poisoning everyone in a rather suicidal way!

Employing chemical warfare against life, even weeds we dislike, is an example of the futility of war to solve problems when there is so much collateral damage to the rest of life in general.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: whose life is it??? Posted by: sirios
» RE: whose life is it??? Posted by: Bliss Doubt

Comments are closed-

And they call me a "health nut."
Posted by: Sushi on Jun 19, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I graduated high school 37 years ago, I have eaten as natural and organic a diet as possible; whole grains, pesticide/antibiotic/hormone-free, and have been berated for it. Meanwhile, at 55, I have no health issues, still fit my size 5 jeans, have virtually no wrinkles.

I continue to buy the majority of my groceries from organic sources and go out of my way to support the small farms. I eat no junk foods. I read ingredient labels and nutrition books.

On a side note, one of my friends has had 4 dogs (different breeds, different sources, different years) all come down with and die from lymphoma. She regularly let them romp on the lawn of a church that was regularly dosed with pesticides. Coincidence? She's since stopped letting her new dogs on the church grounds. None of them are sick.

Call me a nut. I like nuts!

Sushi
"How did you get so round from eating square meals?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It's not just pesticides...
Posted by: minmotstand on Jun 19, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heavy metals have been implicated by dozens of population-based studies, showing increased risks of Parkinson's disease associated with exposures to metals such as mercury, lead, manganese, aluminum, iron, copper, cadmium, and zinc.

Keep in mind, that the essential trace elements I've mentioned are in their toxic forms after release from industry - e.g. iron (III) and other divalent, trivalent metals.

Excessive intake of required metals such as iron can also become toxic, however.

Industry has been associated with Parkinson's disease in several studies.

Parkinson's disease has been reported as far back as 5,000 years, so pesticides can't be the only thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

So some of us
Posted by: osd on Jun 19, 2009 5:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are not surprised by all of this. Enviromental pollution is the same as taking a dump in your glass of water. So why would you do something like that? So why do we pollute the air, water and soil that grows our food. We need this to stay alive, so why do they pollute? Money/greed, why is it that everything always comes down to the seven deadly sins. These were well names, even if your not religous. The more some people get, the more they want. They seem to have lost sight that this Planet is heaven.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

allen
Posted by: pursah on Jun 20, 2009 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems only logical. Pesticides are neuro-toxins. They kill by poisoning the nerves of the bugs. People have nerves, too. Pesticides that build-up to critical mass will kill any being that has nerve cells.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

leftbank
Posted by: markw4786 on Jun 23, 2009 11:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Obama and the Dems in charge now, the chemical companies will be forced to stop using disease causing chemicals on our foods. Oh, bullshit...who am I kidding?
Welders are also susceptible to Parkinson due to inorganic manganese.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS